03 Sumulong Vs COMELEC

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

03 Sumulong vs COMELEC

This is case wherein the decision of the COMELEC to choose which faction of a Political Party
should represent the minority in the Board of Elections is assailed. )

Facts:

 In the 1938 elections, the Popular Front Party supported the campaign of two candidates
from two legislative districts of the province of Pampanga. Both candidates had more
than 10 per centum of the total votes of each legislative districts.
 It appears, however, that said Popular Front Party was then a mere coalition of several
minority groups, thus divided into two: (1) Popular Front faction of Juan Sumulong and
that of (2) Pedro Abad Santos.
o These two factions now stand out as separate and independent minority parties
supporting different sets of candidacies for the forthcoming national elections.

 On September 15, 1941, the Commission on Elections granted to the Popular Front Party
of Abad Santos the right to propose the minority inspector in the second congressional
district of Pampanga.

 On September 26, 1941, the COMELEC modified its ruling of the 15th of September by
actually awarding the minority inspector to the Popular Front Party of Abad Santos. This
resolution is the subject of review in this petition for certiorari.

Issue: Whether the modification of the COMELEC ruling, giving the minority inspector to Popular
Front of Abad Santos is unjust

Held: NO.

Ruling:

It is now a well-settled rule that where the minimum number of votes required by law
(Commonwealth Act No. 657, sec. 5) was polled by a mere coalition or alliance of minority parties,
the right to minority representation in the board of elections inspectors to which such coalition is
entitled, cannot be claimed by any of the component parties which have thereafter separated.
(Sumulong vs. Commission on Elections, 40 Off. Gaz. [9th Sup.], No. 13, pp. 226, 230- 231; Vinzons
vs. Commission on Elections et al., G.R. No. 48596, October 1, 1941.)

In such situation, the Commission shall have the discretion to choose the minority inspector.
(Commonwealth Act No. 657, sec. 5; Vinzons vs. Commission on Elections et al., supra; Rimando
vs. Commission on Elections et al., G.R. No. 48603, October 1, 1941.)

The modification by the Commission of its ruling of September 15th awarding the minority inspector
to the Popular Front Party headed by Abad Santos is a legal exercise of the discretion vested in it
by law.

Dissenting Opinion: J. Ozaeta

Choosing the faction of Abad Santos is unfortunate. Why?


It is a notorious fact that the party headed by Mr. Pedro Abad Santos is the Communist
Party of the Philippines. Before said party joined the Pagkakaisa ng Bayan, which was organized
by Mr. Juan Sumulong, in December, 1936, it was known as the Socialist Party of Pampanga.
o After said party headed by Mr. Abad Santos has separated from the Pagkakaisa ng
Bayan or Popular Front, and has reverted to its former independent existence, the
Commission on Elections now permits it not only to parade as Popular Front — and not
as Communist Party — but also to have the second inspector to which it admittedly is
not entitled. I cannot bring myself to sanction that result.

You might also like