Imam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal Life Amp Madhhab PDF
Imam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal Life Amp Madhhab PDF
Imam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal Life Amp Madhhab PDF
Childhood
He was a distinguished child known for his piety, cleanliness and
asceticism. Once, his uncle sent him with several documents containing
information about some people to the Caliph's office. Ahmad took
those papers and did not see his uncle for a long time. When his uncle
eventually met him, he asked him about the documents and discovered
that Ahmad – who was then a boy – did not deliver them. When asked
why, Ahmad replied: "I wouldn’t hand in those reports, and I have
thrown them in the sea!" To this, his uncle replied: "This little boy fears
Allah so much! What then of us?" Thus, Ahmad refused to act as an
informant, even on behalf of his uncle, due to the fear of Allah that had
been instilled in his heart from such a young age.
The great affectopm and regard between the two Imams is clearly
reflected in the resemblance between the Shafi’i and Hanbali schools of
jurisprudence.
Imam Ahmad did not suffice himself with seeking knowledge, but he
also adorned it with actions, by making Jihad, performing the guard duty
at Islamic frontiers (Ribat) and making Hajj five times in his life, twice
on foot.
1) Divine text (Nass) from the Quran and the Sunnah was the first point
of reference for all scholars of jurisprudence, and in this, Ahmad was
not an exception. Whenever he noticed a divine textual evidence for an
issue, he never referred to other sources, opinions of the Companions,
scholars or resorted to analogical deduction (Qiyas).
Ahmad’s doctrine
As demonstrated previously, Imam Ahmad became the leading authority
on the Orthodox doctrine of Islam, which represented the first three
blessed generations of Islam, untainted with foreign dogmas. Ahmad’s
doctrinal influence can be measured by the fact that, out of the four
traditional schools, the Hanbali school alone maintained its own
theological view, unlike the Hanafi school which adopted the Maturidi
doctrine, or the Shafi’i and Maliki schools that adopted the Ash’ari
doctrine. The secret for this was the depth and length at which Ahmad
spoke in matters of theology, due to the prevailing unorthodoxy in his
age, headed by the Mu’tazilites. Due to this it is noted that there have
been, in comparison to other schools, very few Hanbalis who inclined
towards unorthodox views, for the copious volume of narrations from
Imam Ahmad dealing with specific issues of doctrine made it extremely
difficult for his followers to adhere to any other, yet still remain faithful
followers.
Imam Ahmad’s doctrine could be summarised as follows:
3) He believed that Allah Speaks with letters and sound, for he believed
every word and letter of the Quran to be the word of Allah, contrary to
the Kullabites, who, in their opposition to the Mu’tazilites, affirmed
eternal Speech for Allah, yet still agreed with them in that they believed
that the Quran, which is composed of letters, was created.
4) He believed that Allah literally Hears and Sees; that He has two
Hands with which He created Adam; that Allah has a Face
5) He believed that Allah literally Rose over the Throne after Creating
the heavens and the Earth in six days.
6) He believed that Allah is High above and distinct from His creation
7) He believed that Allah is all Knowing, All Wise, All Power and All
Able, and that Allah has His own Will, He Does what He likes out of
His Wisdom. Whatever Allah has Written and Decreed upon His
creation, must come to pass. Nothing leaves His knowledge, or happens
without His Permission or Will.
10) He held that the sinners amongst the Muslims are under the threat
of Allah's punishment; that if He wishes He may Punish them or
Forgive them; Contrary to the Khawarij. He would not declare a Muslim
to be a disbeliever (Kafir) on account of his sins, nor would he exclude
actions from Iman unlike the Murjia. Once he was asked about those
who declare their belief in the five pillars of Islam, yet refuse to perform
them; he said, in reply, they are disbelievers (Kuffar).
11) He believed in the miracles that occurred at the hands of the Awliya
(pious Muslims) as a favour from Allah.
12) He believed that Abu Bakr is the best of the Companions, followed
by Umar, then the six companions chosen by the latter as Ashab al-Shura
(members of Shura council): Uthman, Ali, al-Zubair, Talha, ‘Abd al-
Rahman b. ‘Awf and Sa’d b. Abi Waqqas; followed by the fighters of
Badr from the Emigrants (Muhajirin) and then the Helpers (Ansar).
The Trial
Imam Ahmad is remembered as a legendary figure in the Islamic history
for his uncompromising stance and for withstanding immense pressure
during the trial of ‘the creation of the Quran’. The Caliph at the time,
Ma’mun, subjected the scholars to severe persecution, at the behest of
the Mu’tazilite theologians who attributed themselves to Imam Abu
Hanifa in jurisprudence. The Mu'tazilites were a heretical Muslim sect,
who sanctified their intelligence above the revelation and espoused the
belief that, even though, the Quran is the speech of Allah, He created
that speech as a distinct entity and called it ‘the Quran’. This was in
opposition to the orthodox belief that Allah spoke every word of the
Quran, and indeed: ‘Allah spoke to Moses directly’, as Allah states in the
Quran.
Nearly all the scholars of Baghdad from the jurists and the traditionists
were tested, and all of them acknowledged the doctrine of the created
Quran, with the exception of the two; Ahmad b. Hanbal and
Muhammad b. Nuh. This greatly pained and angered Imam Ahmad,
such that he boycotted some of the great traditionists for their
acknowledgement, and often refused to narrate from them. Amongst
those boycotted were a close companion and a colleague of Imam
Ahmad, Yahya b. Ma’in, about whom, it is said that Imam Ahmad
[Type text] Page 7
Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal: Life & Madhhab
refused to speak to him until he died and composed the following lines
of poetry censuring his acknowledgement of heresy:
Ya ibn al-madini al-ladhi 'uridat lahu
Finally, Ahmad b. Hanbal and Muhammad b. Nuh were also put to the
test on the order of al-Ma’mun, but they refused to acknowledge the
creation of the Quran. Consequently, they were despatched in irons to
be dealt with by al-Ma’mun himself. On the way, Imam Ahmad
supplicated to Allah to prevent him from meeting al-Ma’mun. His prayer
was answered in the sudden death of al-Ma’mun due to which they were
both sent back. Muhammad b. Nuh passed away on their return journey,
and there was none to prepare his funeral, pray over, and bury him,
except Imam Ahmad.
He remained imprisoned in Baghdad until al-Mu’tasim assumed power.
Al-Mu’tasim, unlike al-Ma’mun, was a destitute to knowledge.
Nevertheless, he continued the Mu’tazilite inquisition as explicitly
requested by al-Ma’mun in his will. His rule was perhaps the most brutal
towards Sunni scholars in general, and Imam Ahmad in particular who
intransigently continued to resist all attempts by the authorities to force
him to acknowledge the creation of the Quran. The frustrated Caliph
finally ordered Ahmad to be flogged in public, which resulted in Ahmad
falling unconscious. Imam Ahmad was released shortly afterwards, when
al-Mu’tasim feared that the commotion caused in Baghdad due to
mistreatment of Ahmad may reach an uncontrollable pitch.
After al-Mu’tasim’s death, al-Wathiq took over the office of Khilafa, and
ordered his loyal Mu’tazili judge in Egypt, Ibn Abi al-Layth to press hard
with the inquisition. This caused many to flee from Egypt, while the
prisons became full of jurists and traditionists who resisted the
government demands. In Baghdad, however, the general public had
become enraged over the policies of the government, which made it
difficult for al-Wathiq to pursue the inquisition with the same vigour. He
therefore, instead of re-imprisoning Imam Ahmad, resolved on
banishing him from Baghdad, saying: “Do not live with me on this
earth!”, and henceforth, Ahmad b. Hanbal went into hiding.
Once during his illness, an old man entered upon Imam Ahmad and
reminded him of his account before Allah, to which Imam Ahmad
began to weep profusely. On another occasion, a man who partook in
the beatings inflicted on Imam Ahmad, came to Salih b. Ahmad, the son
of the Imam, and begged him to seek permission from his father to
allow him to enter, for he felt the guilt of his involvement in the
suffering of the Imam. When he was finally given permission, he entered
upon the Imam and wept, begging for his forgiveness. Imam Ahmad
forgave him on the condition that he would never repeat his actions.
The man left the Imam, and all those present, in tears.
shroud prepared by his female servant. Moreover, his sons took care not
to use water from their homes to wash Imam Ahmad as he had refused
to utilise any of their resources, for accepting the offerings of the ruler.
After preparing his funeral, his sons prayed over him, along with around
200 members of the ruling family, while the streets were teeming with
both men and women, awaiting the funeral procession. Imam Ahmad’s
funeral was then brought out and the multitudes continued to pray over
him in the desert, before and after his burial at his grave.
During the trial of Imam Ahmad, he would often say: “Say to the
heretics, the decisive factor between us and you is the day of funerals”;
meaning, the adherents to the orthodox doctrine always have a good
end, for they earn the love of Allah, as well as the affection of the
multitudes, and their death has a great impact on people’s lives. This is
exactly what took place in this instance, for it is estimated that about 1
300 000 people attended his funeral. One of the scholars said in relation
to this that such a massive attendance at a funeral has never been
equalled in the history of the Arabs, neither in the pre-Islamic era
(Jahiliyah) nor in Islam. The masses were engulfed in the genuine popular
emotion, while the scene of his grave became overwhelmed by such
sentiments that the graveyard had to be guarded by the civil authorities.
In the Islamic history, Ahmad’s funeral is noted as the day when the
Mu’tazilite doctrine was brought to a decisive and a humiliating end,
whilst the Sunni Islam and the Prophetic guidance were the order of the
day. Ahmad’s death had proven the ineffectiveness of the Caliph’s role
in defining Islam, and further unquestionably acknowledged that it were
the scholars, rather than the Caliphs, who were the true ‘inheritors of the
Prophets’. Ahmad’s funeral was marked by the multitudes flocking, and
openly cursing al-Karabisi and al-Marrisi, the chief heretics. This became
a frequent practise amongst the subsequent Hanbali funerals throughout
Islamic history, where the masses would rally behind prominent Hanbali
funerals proclaiming: This day is for Sunnis and Hanbalis! Not Jahmis,
Mu’tazilis or Ash’aris!
This collection was then summarised into a short treatise on the Fiqh of
Imam Ahmad by the Baghdadi-Hanbali jurist al-Khiraqi, which became
known as Mukhtasar al-Khiraqi. This treatise was the first Fiqh manual
ever written in the Madhab, and its first ever commentary was also
written by its very author, thus, making al-Khiraqi the first author of a
Fiqh manual in the Madhab, the first one to write a commentary on a
manual, and indeed the first Hanbali to comment on his own manual.
Al-Majd Ibn Taymiyah, who was the grandfather of the famous Hanbali
theologian and jurist, Taqi al-Din Ibn Taymiyah, was considered to be
one of the great authorities in the school, along with Ibn Qudama, such
that if the two Sheikhs agreed upon an issue, it would be considered the
reliable opinion (mu’tamad) in the school. Al-Majd Ibn Taymiyah
authored his famous and reliable Fiqh manual called al-Muharrar fi al-
Fiqh.
authors. The most famous of those commentaries are Kashaf al-Qina’ ‘An
Matn al-Iqna’, which is a commentary on al-Iqna’, and Sharh Muntaha al-
Iradat, both by al-Buhuti.
Abul-Wafa ‘Ali ibn ‘Aqil (d. 488) – One of the most intelligent
jurists the Hanbalis ever had within their ranks. He was, in his
youth, influenced by the Mu’tazlites and showed admiration for al-
Hallaj (a pantheist who pretended to be a Muslim), but soon
repented and wrote various rebuttals against the Mu’tazlites and
the Ash’arites. Ibn al-Jawzi relates that Ibn ‘Aqil once said: I say
with utmost certainty that the Companions died having no knowledge of the
atoms (Jawhar) or accidents (‘Aradh). Hence, if you feel that you should be
like them, then be! But, if you think that the way of the Doctors of Kalam is
better than the way of Abu Bakr and ‘Umar, then how evil is what you
think! He left behind many works, amongst them voluminous al-
Funun, of which only a small portion is found today.
‘Abdul-Qadir al-Jailani (d. 561) A Hanbali theologian, great
preacher and, perhaps the most influential Sufi figure who
founded the Qadiriyah way (Tariqa). Although, his life is regarded as
a chain of miracles, so much has been claimed about his
‘sainthood’ by his passionate Sufi followers that very little of his
acceptance. His fame also earned him many envious enemies who
continued to conspire against him, until he was imprisoned in the
citadel of Damascus and died therein. His funeral was attended by
a mammoth number of inhabitants of Damascus, while the funeral
prayer in absentia was prayed over him throughout the Islamic
world. He is remembered for his invaluable contributions, not only
to the Hanbali school of jurisprudence and theology, but also to
the rich Islamic heritage. He also produced many students of high
calibre. Names such as Ibn al-Qayyim, al-Dhahabi and Ibn Kathir
are but some of his virtues.
Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziya (d. 751) – The closest companion and a
student of Ibn Taymiyah who shared with him the moments of
ease and hardship, until the latter’s death in the citadel. His works
in various Islamic sciences earned him much acceptance and fame.
Some of his important works include Zaad al-Ma’ad in Seerah and
Fiqh, I’lam al-Muwaqqi’in in Usul al-Fiqh, and al-Kafiyah fil-Intisar lil-
Firqat al-Najiyah, an ode rhyming in the letter Nun on Hanbali
theology, which is taught and studied in Hanbali schools until
today.
Ahmad ibn ‘Abdil-Hadi (d. 744) – A devout and close student of
Ibn Taymiyah and an expert traditionist. He wrote at length the
legendary accounts of his beloved teacher Ibn Taymiyah. He is
also the author of al-Sarim al-Munki fi al-Radd ‘Ala al-Subki, a
violent rebuttal of al-Subki’s attempt to justify taking long journeys
for the visitation of the Prophet’s grave. Unfortunately, he died
before completing this book at the age of forty.
Najm al-Din al-Tufi (d. 716) – The author of several important
works, such as the summarisation of Rawdat al-Nadhir by Ibn
Qudama, also known as al-Bulbul, widely taught until today. In
spite of being a Hanbali in Fiqh, he would often refer to himself as
an Ash’arite and extreme Shi’ite. He was chastised in public and
imprisoned several times for his unorthodox views. Although, his
repentance is reported; however, Ibn Rajab doubted the sincerity
of his repentance.
Shams al-Din b. Muflih (d. 763) – One of the leading authorities
in Hanbali Law who received his tutelage amongst several
prominent Hanbali figures, including Ibn Taymiyah. He gave
particular attention to the juristic preferences of Ibn Taymiyah,
The secret behind the spread of any particular Madhab, or lack thereof,
has mainly been the authorities, responsible for bestowing the Islamic
courts to one faction, at the expense of the other. In a land where courts
were dominated by a particular Madhab, a student qualifying in a
different Madhab had no future, and consequently, was forced to
migrate, or embrace the native Madhab, or conspire with fellow
Madhabists to seize the courts for themselves, by any means necessary.
This was one of the main reasons behind Hanafi-Shafi’i rivalry in the
Islamic history, which at times led to violent clashes.
A scant reading of the Islamic history illustrates that the Hanbalis are
known for having an outstanding character, fearlessness and eagerness
for enjoining the good and forbidding the evil, with Imam Ahmad
setting the precedence by remaining steadfast during the inquisition.
After the demise of Imam Ahmad, the Hanbalis grew stronger in
Baghdad, and as Ibn ‘Asakir notes, they would patrol the streets, during
which, if they noticed a man with an unrelated woman, they would
report him to the police; or if they noticed a musical instrument or a
bottle of alcohol, they would smash it. Al-Khiraqi, who was the first
Hanbali scholar to write a Fiqh manual, died after being severely beaten
while attempting to combat evils in Damascus. Ibn Taymiyah would
likewise patrol the streets with his students, during which, if they noticed
anyone playing chess they disrupt the game; or if they saw utensils of
alcohol or musical instruments, they would smash them. Ibn Taymiyah
was also greatly admired for his fearless encounter with the ruthless
Mongolian invader of Damascus, Qazan; as he is also remembered for
his frequent imprisonment for in defence of the orthodox doctrine.
Conclusion
If a hundred-and-fifty pages by al-Dhahabi, or over seven-hundred
pages by Ibn al-Jawzi could not encompass all the details in the life of
such a magnificent figure in our history, as that of Imam Ahmad b.
Hanbal al-Shaibani, then how can one claim to do justice in this brief
twenty page introduction. The unavoidable omission of detail in such a
piece, should not be considered as a disservice to the Madhab.
The enthusiastic reader with a keen interest to inquire more about Imam
Ahmad is recommended to read the most comprehensive biography of
[Type text] Page 26
Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal: Life & Madhhab
We ask Allah to accept this effort and forgive our shortcomings, for to
err is only human.