GLOBALIZATION : ITS IMPACT ON LABOUR IN INDIA

“Earth provides enough to satisfy every man’s need, but not every
man’s greed
- Mahatma Gandhi

GLOBALIZATION : ITS IMPACT ON LABOUR IN INDIA

- Dr P D Shenoy

The Contours of Globalization

Globalization is shaping a new system of international economic relations be it in the
fields of investment, production, trade, finance or technology. The canvas of
globalization, however, is very vast as it means different things to different people. The
wider view equals globalization with the notion of 􀂳Vasudhaiv Kutumbakam􀂴 (the
whole world is one family) and the narrower economic interpretation with increasing the
ratio of foreign trade and investment in a country’s output. On a philosophical plane,
India has been a votary of globalization since ages. It is reflected in hymns like 􀂵Aa no
bhadra rutavo yantu viswatah􀂶 (let noble thoughts come from all over the universe).

Manusmriti says: 􀂳Sarve bhavantu sukhinah, sarve santu niramayah, sarve bhadrani
pashyantu, maa kaschit dukhabhag bhavet􀂴. The Saints and seers in ancient India had
a global view of mankind in which all human beings could lead a happy life, nobody
practised deceit, everybody wished happiness for others, and nobody suffered hardship
(Krishna, 2002). Globalization, however, refers to a process of deepening economic
integration, increasing economic openness and growing economic interdependence
between countries in the world economy. This process is driven by the lure of profit, and
the threat of competition in the market.

The Second National Commission on Labour, while quoting the Human Development
Report of South Asia, 2001 has defined globalization as:

“The free movement of goods, services, people and information across national
boundaries. It creates and, in turn, is driven by an integrated global economy, which
influences both economic as well as social relations within and across countries. The
opening up of the economy increases competition internationally as well as externally,
leads to structural changes in the economy, alters consumer preferences, life styles and
demands of citizens” (NCL, 2002).

The definition of globalization with intellectual rigour notwithstanding globalization has

been viewed quite differently from the individual perspective. A few such opinions
recorded during the dialogue on Social Dimension of Globalization (ILO, 2004) provide
interesting insights :

“We were sleeping on the shore when a big wave came,” said a participant.
A participant in the Philippines said, “There is no point to a globalization that reduces
the prices of a child’s shoes but costs the father his job.”

A participant from Poland gave an analogy of a force which could be harnessed : “If
globalization is a river, we must build dams to generate power.”

In other words, globalization in its scope, content and application has become quite
controversial. According to Stiglitz (2002) globalization has the potential to enrich
everyone in the world, particularly the poor. But the way globalization has been
managed, including the international trade agreements that have played such a large
role in removing barriers, and the policies that have been imposed on the developing
countries in the process of globalization, need to be carefully and critically scanned.

Current Scenario

Globalization is a complex phenomenon that has had far-reaching effects. Not

surprisingly, therefore, the term “globalization” has acquired many emotive connotations
and become a hotly contested issue in current political discourse. At one extreme,
globalization is seen as an irresistible and benign force for delivering economic
prosperity to people throughout the world. At the other, it is blamed as a source of all
contemporary ills.

The social impact of globalization is not confined just to countries that have been
marginalized from the process or have been less successful in their attempts to
integrate themselves into the global economy. Even in the relatively successful
countries significant social costs are involved in the form of transitional adjustment
costs. China, for example, despite a sustained high GDP rate of growth, has faced the
problem of transitional unemployment that is likely to intensify with the stepping up of
the reform of State-owned enterprises. Similarly, as evidenced by the Asian financial
crisis, even countries with exemplary positive records of economic performance can
suffer heavy social costs.

The fallouts of growth have also been unevenly distributed across countries, among
both industrialized and developing countries. In terms of per capita income growth, only
16 developing countries grew at more than 3 per cent per annum between 1985 and
2000. In contrast, 55 developing countries grew at less than 2 per cent per annum, and
of these, 23 suffered negative growth. At the same time, the income gap between the
richest and poorest countries increased significantly.

This uneven pattern of growth is shaping a new global economic geography. The most
striking is the rapid economic growth in China over the last two decades, together with a
more gradual but significant improvement in the economic growth performance of India
and two countries which together account for more than one-third of the world’s
population.
Though some countries have benefited from globalization, in several countries there
has been a phenomenal reduction in the growth of employment opportunities. Many
workers in the organized sectors lost their jobs.

The official line from the former Prime Minster Atal Behari Vajpayee’s Economic
Advisory Council is unequivocal, arguing, “Globalization is an unavoidable process
which is taking place independent of us. It forces us to cope with it. There is no
room in a globalised world for an economy delinked from world trade and foreign
investment.” The Advisory Council candidly says, “The truth is that if we do not reform
rapidly, and position ourselves to compete, we will be marginalized. There is no divine
dispensation that gives India alone the power to survive and prosper as an isolationist
island in a globalized world.”

Under the new Prime Minister Mr. Manmohan Singh that conviction is undiminished.
Nonetheless, universal consensus on this view is far from apparent. As a Financial
Times columnist wrote in October 2004, “Globalization means many things to many
people, particularly in India, which is host to probably the widest range of anti-
globalization groups in the world.” ( JessicaEinhorn, Business Line – 4.3.2005)

In India economic reform process got accelerated after 1991. In 1991, the country’s
GDP growth rate had dipped to a snaillike 1.1 per cent. In the years of Rao’s Prime
Ministership, India has witnessed an average growth of 5.5%. Today, successive prime
ministers have started calling for 7-8 per cent growth. Other comparisons of the
situation in 1991 and 2004 are more dramatic.

In the early 90’s, inflation was at 17%. Now the Government is worried when it crosses
7%. Foreign Direct Investment then was $133 million; it annually measures about $4
billion today. Forex reserves were $1 billion then; today, they stand at $130 billion and
many experts perceive a crisis of abundance. The market capitalization of Indian
bourses has increased from Rs.1,103 billion to Rs. 15,560 billion; and exports from $18
million to $64 billion during the same period. (Business India – January 3-16, 2005).

The 1991 crisis forced the Indian political establishment to embrace reforms quite
simply because the status quo was not viable. While the first emphasis was to tackle the
macro-economic crisis, success in that arena also paved the way for reforms of
domestic industrial investment policy, foreign investment regulations, and foreign trade.

Since the dark days of 1991, India has come a long way. It has healthy foreign
exchange reserves (despite high levels of domestic debt), a booming software and
services export market, and a burgeoning knowledge economy. Clearly, India has
tremendous potential to benefit from globalization, but there is also consensus that the
challenges confronting Indian development are substantial, even daunting.

India remains handicapped by enormous infrastructure and institutional (labour and

capital) constraints. The question is not whether India has not begun to produce an
impressive record in growth, employment, and poverty reduction, but rather how to
overcome the obstacles impeding even faster progress, as the global economic system
becomes increasingly competitive.

According to the Report of the 2nd National Commission on Labour, the

perceived benefits of globalization are as follows:

Sustained economic growth, as measured by gross national product is the path to

human progress.
Free markets, with little or no intervention from government, generally result in the
most efficient and socially optimal allocation of resources.
Economic globalization, achieved by removing barriers to the free flow of goods and
money anywhere in the world, spins competition, increases economic efficiency, creates
jobs, lowers consumer prices, increases economic growth and is generally beneficial to
everyone.
Privatization, which shifts functions and assets from government to the private
sector, improves efficiency.
The primary responsibility of the government is to provide the infrastructure
necessary to advance commerce and enforce rule of law with respect to property rights
and contracts.

However, there is a growing realization that globalization is not an unmixed blessing. It

can at best be an outcome, not a prerequisite for successful growth strategy.

The following are among the several demerits or pitfalls of globalization:

The process of globalization seems to be driven by a few in a uni-polar world
whereby it is benefiting few and hurting many.
It is another form of imperialism.
It is leading to growing inequalities between the rich and the poor, both at the level
of individuals and among countries.
It is destroying jobs and local communities.
It is ruthless, root less, jobless, fruitless…(UNDP, 1996).

Changes in Labour market structure

Globalisation has resulted in global division of labour. The huge expansion in cross
border capital, trade technology and information flows have become a defining feature
of globalisation. The advent of WTO coupled with the lending policies of IMF and the
World Bank have resulted in globalisation and privatization. The poor worker in a
developing country may be working for long hours but his productivity is low as this
worker lacks access to technology and skills. Productivity has become a central issue.

Unemployment weakens the bargaining position of the workers and enables employers
to hire workers on terms and conditions of work they dictate.
Some of the emerging flexible labour categories are – casual and temporary
workers, consultants, agency workers, home workers, daily workers, part-time
workers and ‘badli’ workers.
Advent of libralisation, privatization and globalization

Policies of privatization and disinvestment are being pursued as part of economic

reforms in India. The objectives of disinvestment basically are:
To enhance budgetary receipts.
To minimize budgetary support towards loss making units.
To improve performance by bringing out changes in ownership and performance
To ensure long term viability and sustainable levels of employment in public sector
enterprises.
Broad based dispersal of shares, especially in the profit-making public sector
enterprises among investors (Venkata Ratnam & Naidu 2002, p. 19).

Three broad reasons why privatization is being pursued are greater economic
democracy through increased private initiatives in economic activities, achieving higher
levels of economic growth and employment, and reducing budgetary deficits. In other
words, privatization, basically, refers to removal of administrative controls and
regulations and transfer of public enterprises to private sector.

Whatever form it takes, social effects of privatization or restructuring will be as follows :

Initial overstaffing will lead to rationalization, retrenchment and displacement of labour

Informalisation of the economy
Stagnation of employment in organized sector
Growing casualization of labour

In dealing with the redundant workers, several options are available though not
all are equally attractive in solving the problem of unemployment. These are :

Voluntary retirement scheme (VRS)

Cash compensation or golden handshake
Retraining of workers
Redeployment
Counselling
Eventual Rehabilitation
Creation of unemployment benefit and social security.

Small Scale Industries

So far as India is concerned, the small scale industrial sector accounts for about 28
million units, 16 million employment and production of over 7500 items with export
share of about 34%. The New Economic Policy pursued since 1991 has brought this
sector face to face with competition through delicensing, reduction in customs and
excise duties. Several small scale units have withered away but those who have
adopted modern production practices like auto ancillary sectors have benefited
substantially.
Benefits of Globalisation

The global economy is undergoing a major change-shift towards knowledge-based

growth. India is preparing for and participating in the emerging knowledge-based
economy. The new economy and high-tech sectors are exhibiting openness,
competitiveness and knowledge intensity. Using its intellectual manpower India has
developed an expertise in producing generic drugs and has been able to increase its
exports in a highly competitive market.

The international capital market is providing increased opportunities to India to attract

FDI. India’s established credentials in IT and ITEs can be leveraged to develop a
competitive advantage in other fields such as different branches of engineering,
scientific research, bio-technology, medicine, pharmaceuticals, agriculture and
education. Further, textiles and garment industry will expand with the phasing down of
quantitative restrictions under Multi Fibre Agreement (MFA).

Internationalisation of Production Chains (Sub-contracting, outsourcing

arrangements)

India is emerging as a major hub in the pharmaceutical sector. There are global
alliances (as between GlaxoSmithKline and Ranbaxy Laboratories) and
acquisitions (like Ranbaxy buying RPG Aventis in France, Wockhardt acquiring
CP Pharmaceuticals in the UK and Zydus Cadilla buying Alpharma in France)
(Oberoi & Chhabra,1990).

There is emergence of a buoyant private sector with industries like Tatas, Ranbaxy,
Mahindra & Mahindra etc. becoming conglomerates. Such companies not only
assimilate foreign capital and know-how but also display the ability to withstand MNC
competition and becoming global players themselves.

India has produced global players in software like TCS, Wipro, Infosys, Iflex, Satyam,
HCL Tech and Mphasis. NRIs are also marching ahead; after its American acquisition of
Wilbur Ross’s International Steel Group, Lakshmi Mittal’s newly named Mittal Steel
Company straddles four continents and fourteen countries to become the largest steel
producer in the world with a 70 million tonne capacity. Even the public sector companies
in India are becoming multinational majors. ONGC, GAIL and Indian Oil have
investments in countries like Angola, Iran, Iraq, Libya, Myanmar, Russia, Sudan, Syria,
Vietnam, SriLanka and Mauritius.

India has been a beneficiary of sub-contracting and outsourcing arrangements, thereby

becoming an integral part of the global production chain. Outsourcing (the contracting
out of business functions previously performed inhouse), particularly, the increasing
trend of offshoring (the contracting out to foreign as opposed to domestic affiliates), has
prompted many to suggest that the phenomenon is leading to a re-allocation of jobs
from developed to developing economies (For example, according to a study, in the
ICT-using sector, 3.3 million jobs in America will move offshore by 2015.
Impact on Trade Union organizations and their role in Social Dialogue
Institutions

Verification of membership strength of Central Trade Union Organizations is conducted

by the Chief Labour Commissioner from time to time. BMS, INTUC, CITU, HMS and
AITUC have emerged as the biggest five. They control the workers in coal, mining, ports
and docks, railways, textiles, iron and steel, engineering and power sectors. The new
entrant is Self-Employed Women’s Organisation (SEWA) which is a registered trade
union and whose membership strength will be verified by the Chief Labour
Commissioner as per a court directive. Several CTUOs like NLO, HMKP have lost their
all India character.

Due to globalisation, contractualisation and casualisation and as a result of the entry of

several multi-nationals, the unions have been losing strength and power ever since the
reform process has begun. The public sector industries no longer can price their
products on cost plus basis. According to a directive issued by the Department of Public
Enterprises, the PSEs cannot depend on budgetary support for increasing the wages
and allowances of the workmen of their work.

The mandays lost due to strikes and lockouts are very high compared to most other
countries. Percentage of women members in trade unions that submit returns has
increased but the figure is not a satisfactory one as a substantial section of women
workers are engaged as ‘home workers’. Less than two per cent of the workers in
formal and informal sectors of India are covered by collective bargaining agreements.

New Actors and the Emerging Dynamics.

The industrial relations system comprises certain actors in a certain context. The actors
are a hierarchy of managers or of workers and trade unions. Then, there are
governmental agencies. In the post-liberalization, globalization era, consumers and
community have begun to assert themselves and take a significant role. When the rights
of consumers and community are affected, the rights of workers/unions and
managers/employers are taking a back seat.

The court rulings are borne by the realization that wider public good matters most in
preference to the narrow self interest of a minority. Workers and unions, in particular are
asked to assert their rights without impinging on the rights of others, particularly the
consumers and the community. Hence, the ban against bandhs and even restrictions
even on protests and dharnas.

Increasingly, trade unions are getting isolated and see a future for themselves and their
members only when they align themselves with the interests of the wider society.
Pro-labour Pro investor Policies:

World over, when the State assumed a welfare role and adopted pro-labour policies,
trade unions have grown in strength and power. When the State is neutral, trade union
movement gets stagnant. When the State adopts pro-investor policies, trade unions are
declining in power and influence, if not in number. In these circumstances, unless trade
unions forge broader and wider alliances with the society – consumers and community
and various civil society institutions, including non-governmental institutions – they find
their power base dwindling. (Venkata Ratnam 2005).

Declining trade union density

In the traditional strongholds of trade union membership – government and public

sector – the workforce is declining due to non-filling of vacancies and the introduction of
voluntary/early separation schemes. New employment opportunities are shrinking in
these sectors. In the private sector, particularly the service and the soft ware sectors,
the new, young and female workers are generally less eager to join the unions. Trade
unions are still to conceive and implement meaningful strategies to make unionism
relevant and appealing to these new and diverse workgroups.

It is mainly in the informal economy, thanks to the initiatives that the government is
willing to consider in the realm of social security benefits, that there is a prospect of rise
in trade union membership.

Here too, trade unions are finding an adversary in someone who is otherwise
considered an ally: the non-governmental organizations operating under the guise of or
as virtual trade unions.

The sickness, closure and non-viability of industries have forced the trade unions to re-
orient their role to ensure survival of the industry. The workers appear to be willing to
overlook their grievances as they are more concerned with retention of employment.
Hence, they are not reporting grievances to unions. The reduction in employment has
led to reduction in union membership making unions vulnerable. Issues such as survival
of industry, maintaining competitive edge and productivity dominate collective
bargaining. There appears to be a growing realization of the futility of a confrontationist
attitude in the unions.

The threat of privatization and withdrawal of budgetary support looming large over the
Ordnance Factories Board, with its nearly 40 factories manufacturing mainly defence
equipment and ammunition, adopted strategies such as diversification of production for
civilian market, marketing these products in domestic and international markets,
stopping all recruitments, cutting over-time payment bills and going for I.S.O.
certification. The federations/unions operating in Ordnance Factories have not opposed
these strategies. More and more stress is given on R&D. TISCO has completely
overhauled its production unit at Jamshedpur bringing in new technology. SAIL has
modernized its plants at Durgapur and Rourkela.
Worker militancy replaced by Employer Militancy?

Economic reforms introduced in India in 1991 signify India’s quest for global economic
integration. If during the decade 1981-90, India lost 402.1 million man-days due to
industrial conflict, in the subsequent decade, 1991-2000, the number has come down to
a half: 210 million. This does not mean that the industrial relations situation has
actually or substantially improved.

Workers are reluctant to go on strike because of fear of job insecurity, concern about
the futility of strikes and recognition of the imperative need to consider the survival of
enterprise as a prerequisite for job and income security.

Further, trade unions are hesitant in giving a call for a strike because it may lead to loss
of jobs or closure of the unit. What is even more striking is that over 60 per cent of the
man-days lost in the post-reform period was due to lockouts and less than 40 per cent
due to strikes. It must be added that quite a few lockouts may have been preceded by
strikes.

One measure of trade unions becoming more defensive than being on a more offensive
and collision course with employers is seen from the shift in their actions from strikes to
litigation. Also, instead of pressing for higher wages and improved benefits, trade unions
are pressing for maintenance of existing benefits and protection and claims over non-
payment of agreed wages and benefits.

Collective bargaining:

As discussed earlier and also in the Chapter III with the shift in level of coordination and
bargaining from national/sectoral to enterprise/plant level, trade unions’ bargaining
power is shrinking. Also, there is a gradual movement from parity to disparity. Since
1992 to date, over 100 of the 240 central public sector corporations did not have wage
revision because the government announced that companies have to mobilize
resources to pay for workers wages and that the government would no longer subsidize
wage increases. (Venkatarantam 2005).

Other methods of dispute resolution

The conciliators both at the central and at the State level have started appreciating the
impact of globalization on industrial relations and labour market institutions in the new
perspective and are very sympathetic to the needs of the employer who has to face
competition around the globe for their products. Accordingly, they have to make
changes in the product design which entail changes in the working conditions. The
workers have to retrain and improve their skills. Even, multi-skilling has become a
necessity.

Workers who cannot adapt themselves to these new demands have to be given the
option of going home through voluntary retirement schemes. Accordingly, the
conciliation machinery is not compelling the employers to retain the existing work force
under all circumstances. Interest disputes resolution through arbitration and wage
boards are moving into the museum of history. The presiding officers in the arena of
industrial adjudication have become more sympathetic to the needs of the
managements in the globalized world. The appropriate Governments are generally
permitting lay off, retrenchments and closures even though, they were adamantly,
declining the same in the 70s and 80s. Even the apex court has become very strict
about indiscipline and lethargy of the workers in the industry. Instances have been
quoted earlier in this study.

As regards the changes in the industrial relations machinery, it is felt that inspection of
establishments cannot be done away with. However, the process of inspection can be
used to create awareness and to educate the employers and workers with regard to
benefits of timely and genuine compliance. The role of inspector can also be modified
so that he acts as a facilitator helping employers in complying with the provisions of the
laws. Selective and purposeful inspections have to replace routine statistics oriented
inspections.

Similarly, the conciliation officers need to be well aware of the new challenges posed by
globalization before the employers and employees and equip themselves with
necessary knowledge, attitude and skills to handle industrial disputes whose nature and
dimensions will be very different from industrial disputes hitherto handled.

To be successful, they have to avoid 5 ‘A’s and promote 3 ‘H’s:

A1 ….. Anger H1 ….. Honesty

A2 ….. Anxiety H2 ..... Health
A3 ….. Annoyance H3 ….. Helpfulness
A4 ….. Arrogance
A5 ….. Arguments

The process of globalisation has forced trade unions to be defensive and maintain a low
profile. Therefore, there is a need for the industrial relations machinery to be more
proactive and vigilant so that undercurrents of discontentment and grievances are
detected in time as unions may not report the grievance in changed environment.

Labour Market Flexibility

Even within the organized sector, an increasing number of jobs are approximating the
character of these in the unorganized sector as a result of the increasing labour market
flexibility in the wake of globalization. A comprehensive survey of about 1300 firms
scattered over 10 States and nine important manufacturing industry groups, shows that
between 1991 and 1998, employment increased at the rate 2.84 per cent per annum
(Deshpande et al, 2004). Non manual employment increased at 5 per cent per annum
whereas manual employment increased at 2.29 per cent. This increase is in total
employment was brought by increasing the share of non-permanent employees and
increase in manual employment by increasing the share of women workers.

Smaller firms grew faster than bigger firms. Firms, which increased sales, increased
manual employment as did those which employed contract workers. Employers who
increased fixed capital per worker reduced manual employment. Employers increased
employment but only of one or other category of non regular flexible workers.

It was found that as a whole over the 7 years of liberalization (between 1991 and 1998)
dualism in the labour market did increase. The share of permanent manual workers
declined from close to 68 per cent in 1991 to 64 per cent in 1998. Not only did the share
of non-permanent increase but the share of casual in non-permanent increased even
faster. It is the big firms that resorted to the greater use of non-permanent workers.
Holding all other factors constant, firms employing 50-99 workers and those employing
500 or more workers, increased the share of non-permanent workers significantly
between 1991 and 1998. Also, firms employing 500 workers or more increased the
share of temporary workers.

Casual employment did not show an association with size of employment. Women
workers were mostly employed in large firms. Firms employing 1000 workers or more
accounted for more than 75 per cent of all women workers. Firms, which employ a
higher share of non-permanent, also employ a higher share of women. Firms employing
50-99 workers and 500 and over report an increase in the share of female workers.

From the above, one should not hasten to conclude that there is no rigidity in the Indian
labour market. Irrespective of its impact on employment, a degree of excessive or
unwarranted protection to labour may lead to inflexibility in labour adjustment required
for restructuring of enterprises in the interest of competitive efficiency. In the wake of
liberalization, this problem has been brought center stage and there has been frequent
demand by the industry and foreign investors to have some kind of ‘exit’ policy – the
right of hiring and firing.

In this respect the provisions of the I.D. Act which lay down conditions and procedures
for retrenchment of workers have been widely criticized. It is contended that the
provisions are so restrictive that reduction in workforce or closures are extremely
difficult even if the employer is agreeable to pay the compensation as required under
the law. This is because under the law prior permission of the government is required to
retrench workers or effect closures in the case of enterprises employing more than 100
workers and such permissions in the past were generally not granted by the Central and
the State Governments.

Of late, the scenario has changed in the wake of globalisation. The Labour Ministry of
the Central Government and the Labour Departments of the State Governments are
regularly conducting the hearing of applications for lay-off, retrenchment and closure by
inviting representatives of the workers and employers. After following the principles of
natural justice, orders are issued on the basis of merits of each case taking due note of
the long-term viability and competitiveness of the enterprise. This has resulted in
granting permission in most of the cases where applications have been made to the
appropriate government. Accordingly, the existence of Chapter VB in the I.D. Act cannot
be blamed for all the ills faced by industrialists.

In spite of these obstacles, many enterprises were able to adjust their workforce by
rationalization and technological changes, but the process has been tardy.

Several routes have been found out – illegal closures by not paying electricity bills, etc.
All these have only added to the problem of labour – they are neither paid their wages
nor their due compensation. This has also resulted into significant industrial sickness as
well as the prevalence of redundancies leading to their loss of competitiveness.
Although, unions have generally resisted any legislative or executive move to make
closure and retrenchment easier, in recent years unions at the enterprise level have
generally been found to be accepting the inevitability of adjustments in the workforce in
the face of globalization and industrial restructuring. (Sharma – 2005).

Static Labour Policy but changed mindset of the judiciary, legislature and
the executive.

A remarkable feature of industrial relations in the wake of globalization is the gradual

withdrawal of the State in their traditional role of actively supporting the organized
labour. Though, Labour law reforms will be explained later in greater detail are not
taking place both the labour administration and adjudication machinery have been more
willing than before to entertain the concerns of industry. Some State governments –
notably Rajasthan, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, Gujarat and Uttar Pradesh, for
instance, - have taken the initiative to make small changes in labour laws and a major
effort to drastically simplify the returns to be submitted by employers and ease the
pressure of labour inspections.

Labour Law Reforms

In India we have a plethora of labour laws. There are certain overlapping provisions
also. Hence, there is an urgent need for rationalization, codification and simplification of
labour laws. The National Labour Law Association (NLLA) had conducted a study in
great detail and prepared a draft legislation in this context. However, the Labour Code
prepared by the NLLA could not be utilized for various reasons. As it may not be
possible to introduce major labour law reforms, it is envisaged that the government may
go in for piecemeal reforms in particular by amending certain provisions of I.D. Act and
C.L. (R&A) Act.

It is well accepted that survival of workers depends upon survival of industry. Therefore,
creation of conditions and environment conducive not only for survival but further growth
of industry is the need of the hour. In this context, the concern of employers that the
existing labour laws need a thorough and wholesale review with a view to rationalizing
and simplifying them by consolidating them and by amending certain provisions which
may be out of tune with present needs to be addressed in earnest.

At the same time, interests of workers also must be protected. In this context, Chapter
VB of I.D. Act, 1947 and Section 10 C.L.(R&A) Act need amendment. The requirement
of permission may be done away in a phased manner with improvement in social
security particularly by enhancing retrenchment compensation. Similarly, the ancillary
work may be taken out of the purview of Section 10 so that such work can be
outsourced.

Industrial Disputes Act:

Mr. Yashwant Sinha, the then Finance Minister in his budget speech (2001) stated that
the chapter VB would be amended to raise the existing limit from 100 workers to 1000
workers. The Chapter V-B of the I.D. Act regulates lay off, retrenchment and closure in
an industrial establishment which engages more than 100 workmen, and which is not of
a seasonal character. All factories, mines and plantations are covered under this
chapter. This resulted in criticism from several trade union quarters. The severest
criticism emanated from the founder President of BMS.

The Task Force on Employment Opportunities (Ahluwalia Committee) recommended

doing away completely with the permission clause in all establishments. The threshold
limit of 100 was introduced by the 1976 amendment to the ID Act. Prior to that, the limit
was 300 or more workers. The Second National Labour Commission has recognized
the need for providing flexibility to the employers in handling labour to promote
competitiveness and improve productivity in the context of globalization. The
Commission has taken care to provide a safety net cushion to the workers.

The Commission believes if the employer could decide the size of the employment at
the start of the business, why should he not do so during the conduct of the business.
Therefore, it has recommended the repeal of section 9A which relates to issue of notice
of change in the conditions of work.

The Commission has also favoured complete freedom to the employers to lay off or
retrench workers. Further, it has recommended restoration of the original threshold limit
of 300 or more workers relating to the need of the employers to get prior permission
from the appropriate Government for closure. However, the Commission has suggested
payment of all dues to the workers and higher compensation to the workers than
provided in the I.D. Act.

Just as an industrialist has a right to establishing a factory or start a mining or plantation

operation, equity demands that he should have freedom to close down the
establishment. In the era of globalization and severe competition in the manufacturing,
mining and plantation sectors (commodity sector), it is necessary to have an urgent re-
look into the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act relating to lay off, retrenchment
and closure. In several advanced countries, there is a clear-cut hire and fire policy.
Even in China there are not many restrictions in this regard. Time has come to review
the provisions in the I.D. Act relating to this subject. A simpler hire and fire policy can
attract more FDI in the manufacturing, plantation and mining sector.

It is well neigh impossible to raise the existing limit from 100 to 1000 workers as
announced by a former Finance Minister in his Budget speech. What is feasible is to
initiate a continuous social dialogue to convince the trade unions to increase this figure
initially to 200 though the Second National Labour Commission has given a clear-cut
rationale to increase the figure to 300. As the UPA Government is supported by Left
parties and Left trade unionists are opposed to any such move in view of the specific
provision in the National Common Minimum Programme relating to protection of the
rights of the workers, it is going to be a slow and arduous path leading to the desired
goal.

Section 9-A of the I.D. Act casts responsibility on the employer to give 21 days notice of
change to the workmen or to their union before effecting any change on any matter
specified in the Fourth Schedule attached to the Act. The Fourth Schedule relates to
conditions of service for which notice has to be given.

The two clauses which are considered out of tune in a globalised scenario cover
the following aspects:-

(a) Rationalisation, standardization or improvement of plant or technique which is likely

to lead to retrenchment of workmen;

(b) Any increase or reduction (other than casual) in the number of persons employed or
to be employed in any occupation or process or department or shift (not occasioned by
circumstances over which the employer has no control)

As globalization has resulted in increased competition, the manufacturing industry was

adversely affected resulting in diminishing rate of growth in this sector. The sector could
not face the competition given by the Chinese goods flooding the market at affordable
prices. It is reported that the rate of growth of manufacturing sector of China is almost
twice that of India. This certainly calls for introspection. The time has come to deal with
these two clauses of Fourth Schedule appended to the I.D. Act as rationalization,
technological upgradation and improved productivity are of an imminent necessity.

Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act, 1970:

The Second Labour Commission has recommended the use of contract labour for
conduct of non core activities and for sporadic and seasonal demands it should be
permissible even for core activities.

However, the 2nd NCL has taken care to look after the welfare of the workers and
accordingly, has recommended that the contract labour should be paid at the same rate
as the regular worker, following the principle of ‘equal pay for equal work’. In the event
of default by the contractor, the principal employer shall be held responsible. While, the
most trade unions are against relaxation of these provisions, the employers are not
happy with equating the wages of the regular workers with the contract workers.

Recommendations of the Group of Ministers on amendments to section 10

of the Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act.

The National Democratic Alliance (NDA) Government had set up a Group of Ministers
to look into the Labour Law reforms. This was headed by the then Deputy Chairman,
Planning Commission. The Group had almost finalised the recommendations to amend
Section 10 of the C.L.(R&A) Act to permit contract labour in the following operations or
processes namely:

(a) sweeping, cleaning, dusting and gardening;

(b) collection and disposal of garbage and waste;
(c) security, watch and ward;
(d) maintenance and repair of plant, machinery and equipments;
(e) house-keeping, laundry, canteen and courier;
(f) loading and unloading;
(g) information technology;
(h) support services in respect of an establishment relating to hospital, educational and
training institution, guest house, club and transport;
(i) export oriented units established in Special Economic Zones and units exporting
more than seventy five per cent or more of their production; and
(j) construction and maintenance of buildings, roads and bridges.

Globalization has led to liberalization, contractualisation, casualisation and creation of a

host of temporary jobs. The current structure of the C.L.(R&A) Act puts a severe
constraint on the employers in creating temporary and casual jobs. In advanced
countries, this is not the case. It is true that the contract workers must get all facilities
such as minimum wages, weekly off, safe working conditions, paid leave, maternity
leave and a social safety net.

Section 10 of the C.L.(R&A) Act reads as follows:-

“Prohibition of employment of contract labour: -

(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, the appropriate Government may,
after consultation with the Central Board or, as the case may be, a State Board, prohibit,
by notification in the Official Gazette, employment of contract labour in any process,
operation or other work in any establishment.

(2) Before issuing any notification under sub-section (1) in relation to an

establishment, the appropriate Government shall have regard to the conditions of
work and benefits provided for the contract labour in that establishment and other
relevant factors, such as –
 (a) whether the process, operation or other work is incidental to, or necessary for the
industry, trade, business, manufacture or occupation that is carried on in the
establishment;
(b) whether it is of perennial nature, that is to say, it is of sufficient duration having
regard to the nature of industry, trade, business, manufacture or occupation carried on
in that establishment;
(c) whether it is done ordinarily through regular workmen in that establishment or an
establishment similar thereto;
(d) whether it is sufficient to employ considerable number of wholetime workmen.

Explanation – If a question arises whether any process or operation or other work

is of perennial nature, the decision of the appropriate Government thereon shall
be final.”

The Central Government and State Governments have set up tripartite Advisory Boards
to advise the appropriate Government on these matters and during the last three
decades, these boards have met at regular intervals and have recommended abolition
of contract labour in several processes and operations in a large number of industrial
establishments. However, there is no provision in the Act to compel the employers to
regularize those workers who were earlier on contract.

The current thinking is that this provision is not in tune with the requirement of the Indian
industry facing severe competition in a globalized world. Most employers feel that
Section 10 should be repealed, whereas most trade unions are opposed to such a
move. The via media could be what has been recommended by the Group of Ministers
(GOM) constituted by the NDA Government, a reference to which has been made
earlier in this chapter. In the current scenario, trade unions apprehend loss of jobs.
Section 10 of the Act could be amended to incorporate the provisions suggested by the
GOM. It can facilitate more efficient functioning of the industries.

In the fast changing scenario, new types of industries are coming up, certain old
industries are getting closed. There was bird flu which hit China and South East Asia
and there was a sudden spurt of demand for the Indian goods. The industrialists cannot
be expected to engage permanent workers to meet such contingencies. It is found that
only specialized workforce can handle certain items of work which do not require
permanent workmen. Multi-storied structures have to be cleaned at regular intervals by
specialized agencies. Similarly, security, gardening, housekeeping – these are all
activities which can easily be outsourced without endangering the job security of core
group of workers.

When the Western world is outsourcing several of its activities to India, why should
there be a hindrance for the Indian industrialists to outsource some of their activities
without burdening themselves with a permanent workforce for peripheral activities?
Hence, there is an urgent need to amend Section 10 of the C.L.(R&A) Act to promote
contract labour in 10 sets of activities enumerated above. A flexible contract based
labour market framework for manufacturing would attract more domestic investment. It
will also attract more FDI. The FDI would also bring with it access to cutting edge
technology and it will also be critical for the next phase of globalisation.

The C.L.(R&A) Act, 1970 applies to (a) to every establishment in which 20

or more workmen are employed on any date of the preceding 12 months as
contract labour and (b) to every contractor who employs or who employ on any
date of the preceding 12 months 20 or more workmen. The Act does not ban
temporary employment. In the era of globalization, temporary jobs have become
the new buzz word in the corporate world. Temporary employment is fast
emerging as the first choice for many individuals and companies.

It is estimated that in another three years, around 14 million Indians will

opt for temporary jobs. World-wide temporary staffing is a $200 billion industry.
While the multi national companies were the early converts, other corporates too
are jumping on the bandwagon. Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) has emerged
as the largest player with 44,000 temporary hands.

Labour Laws (Exemption from Furnishing Returns and Maintaining

Registers by Certain Establishments) Act, 1988

In a globalised scenario, it is necessary to improve the competitiveness of

small-scale industries and to simplify their functioning vis-à-vis, the requirement
of various labour laws. This Act provides for the exemption to employers, in
relation to establishments employing a small number of persons from furnishing
returns and maintaining registers under certain labour laws.

Small establishments will be required to maintain only three master registers and will be
required to submit only one core return in lieu of the existing returns prescribed under
the various labour laws. Similarly, very small establishments would be allowed to
combine the three master registers into a single register. Further, they would be
required to submit only one annual core return in lieu of the existing returns prescribed
under the various labour laws.Formats of the registers and returns have been
prescribed in the Act itself.

However, in view of the special requirements of social security legislation such as

recovery of contribution from employers and employees their accountability,
reimbursement etc. no exemption has been given in relation to social security
legislation. The enactments from which exemption is sought to be given have been
mentioned in the schedule to the Act.

Repeal of Chapter VB may not result in a panacea for all the ailments faced by Indian
industry. Here a need has arisen to distinguish between labour reforms and labour law
reforms. More than labour law reforms, there is a need for labour reforms and
management reforms. A lot of time is wasted by the workers by late coming, early
going, extended lunch and tea intervals, sleeping during night shifts etc. This can be
avoided. Similarly, workers need to accept retraining and redeployment with equanimity.
Managements need to view workers as human beings with a humane approach and
improve facilities for the health, safety and well-being of workers on the shop floor. They
should take up schemes to provide social safety net for those workers who have been
rationalized, retrenched and displaced. Suggestion schemes and incentive schemes to
improve production and productivity and increased inter se competition between the
groups of workers to excel need to be introduced.

Impact on Industrial Relations including in the newly emerging Services

Sector

Most of the trade unions have opposed the policy of globalization, economic reforms,
privatization and disinvestments. They attempted to demonstrate unity in such
opposition and organized nation-wide strikes and bandhs. The marked feature of post
globalization is that the unions in the private sector hesitate to go on strike. The public
sector undertakings viz. Coal India, Singareni Collieries Ltd., Indian Airlines, Air India,
ports and docks, banking and insurance sector, telecom, power sector continued to be
plagued by industrial unrest.

After the great railway strike of 1974 which paralysed the railways functioning
throughout India for nearly a month, it has been generally quiet on the railway front. The
well established Permanent Negotiating Machinery is functioning more or less smoothly.
Hence, there have been only a few local instances of unrest since the opening up of the
economy. Similarly, after the historic strike of textile workers in Maharashtra in 1982
which resulted in loss of employment of more than 75,000 workers, the textile workers
are generally hesitant to go on strike, barring a few exceptions viz. the prolonged strike
of Delhi textile workers in 1986.

Workers of Coal India Ltd. have participated in several agitational programmes even
after the advent of globalization. It appears there is no impact of globalization on the
trade unions operating in Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. The workmen of public
sector airlines industry have gone on sporadic strikes from time to time even after the
opening up of the economy.

The trade unions operating on ports and docks have agitated on several
occasions on the issue of Productivity Linked Bonus. They have demanded this
bonus on all ports basis which is not a rational one. The staff of public sector
banks have been opposing privatization and have also been agitating for revision
of their salary. The staff had to concede for all-round computerization and also
flexible deployment policy. The insurance sector workers have been agitating for
revision of their salary from time to time.

Power sector reforms have resulted in unbundling and privatization of power sector
companies resulting in acceleration of agitational programmes by the unions. Despite
the disturbances in the public sector, the telecom industry is rapidly moving towards 250
million customers with the highly versatile phones and tariffs matched with the world
class technology. The Indian telecom industry is moving forward in a revolutionary
mode. The private sector has not been affected by any visible industrial relation
problems.

Information Technology Sector

The profile of the professionals in the Indian Software Labour Market in

terms of their social background, gender and marital status across the sampled
firms is illustrative of the rather elitist nature of the industry. Though, the software
industry creates a significant potential for employment, given the magnitude of
unemployment in India amidst a shrinking public and private sector, the IT
industry will not have the capacity to absorb the growing supply of labour force
entering the labour market. The requirements of learning and adapting equally
bring about a high degree of insecurity for the professionals.

Business Process Outsourcing

Nearly 75% of US and European multi-national companies now use

outsourcing or shared services to support their financial functions. The findings
are based on interviews with CFOs and MDs of 127Europe-based and 151 USbased
companies. The trend of MNCs wanting to increase their outsourcing
offers tremendous opportunity for the service providers with facilities in India, as
they are cost effective and bring value to clients. The BPO industry in India in
2004 had recorded a growth of 50% over 2003.

The BPO industry is booming and a lot of companies will try outsourcing to
Indian firms. Some potential areas they would consider include low-end
customer care business. Besides, financial services, insurance, airline,
hospitality, IT, automobile and publishing would also attract attention of going
forward. There is tremendous potential in the knowledge process outsourcing
space. Unlike in BPO where the focus is on executing standardized routine
processes, KPO involves processes that demand advanced information search,
analytical, interpretation and technical skills as well as some judgment and
decision making. The workers have long working hours. Youngsters are burning
both ends of the candle. It has become a virtual rat race. They face a lot of
stress and even psychological problems.

BPO is an emerging IT enabled service sector which functions in

unionless environment. The workers in BPOs are given fancy designations such
as executives, officers etc. and are made to believe that they are not workers
employed in other sectors. The workers in some BPOs are provided with some
mechanism designed to create avenues to air their grievances but with least
damage to the firm and through creation of empowering situations such as
consultative committee, group etc.
Tourism and Retail Sector

The tourism sector is looking up with the launching of heritage-tourism,

eco-tourism, health-tourism, adventure-tourism and Buddhist circuit-tourism in
“Incredible India”. There are indications that medical tourism is likely to make a
headway in the days to come. In view of the existence of large number of
hospitals in the private sector which can offer super specialty treatment at
reasonable cost and with almost no waiting period, it is attracting an international
spectrum of patients.

The retail sector is a fast emerging growth sector. This can be seen in the
major metropolitan cities and its suburbs and also in the major cities with the
establishment of huge malls which provide almost everything under one roof. In
the retail sector, the employers are trying very hard to retain workers. However,
attrition rate at the front-end is manageable and not alarming now. Official
estimates put the industry attrition level between 30% and 40%. There is also an
element of poaching by rival outfits. Hence, many big retail stores are recruiting
10% more than required staff at the front-end level.

Wage Setting Mechanism

Less than 2% of the workforce in India is covered by collective bargaining

agreements as compared to 15% in USA, 18% in Mexico, 80% in Australia, 15%
in China, 20% in Japan, 3% in Malaysia and 27% in Thailand and 90% in France,
Italy, Finland and Belgium (Global Report, 2004). Despite this low percentage,
collective bargaining is a preferred method of resolving interest disputes. This is
especially so because arbitration and wage boards are losing importance.
Industrial adjudication is time consuming and can be utilized only as a means of
last resort. Minimum Wages Act functions as the single most important
legislation in this field and this calls for continued vigorous implementation in a
mission mode by the enforcement machinery both at the Centre and at the State
level.

Informal Economy

The problems faced by the workers in the informal economy are

multifarious. These can be resolved by a slew of measures:

(i) Organizing the unorganized sector workers

(ii) expansion of the central and State level welfare schemes
(iii) drafting of a comprehensive Bill on unorganized sector workers’
welfare
(iv) resolution of the problems of informal sector enterprises
(v) skill development and
(vi) employment generation.
The solution to the problem of the informal sector in rural areas lies in the
extension of the two-fold strategy as suggested by Sheila Bhalla (1997). On the
production side, the rate of growth of farm output must be pushed continuously,
while on the labour supply side, the existing agricultural workers must be
absorbed increasingly in non-farm jobs.

(i) Organizing the unorganized sector workers

In Kerala and West Bengal, an appreciable degree of unionization of
workers in the informal sector has taken place. Despite several efforts in this
direction, much headway could not be made so far in other States except in
Gujarat where a large number of women workers have been organized by
SEWA. In the earlier chapter, the success story of the SEWA model has been
explained in great detail. Whether this model can be replicated through out the
length and breadth of the country is an important issue, which needs
consideration.

Self employed women workers are there all over India. But the need of
the hour is an adequate number of selfless and courageous women leaders.
With the empowerment of women in rural and urban areas through the
constitutional amendment of Articles 73 and 74 providing for compulsory
reservation of 33 1/3% seats in the local bodies, and also through an increase in
the awareness and literacy level of women workers in an atmosphere of liberal
democracy, it appears that this model can be replicated in the near future.

(ii) Expansion of the Welfare Schemes

At present, the hospitals and dispensaries run by the Employees State

Insurance Corporation (ESIC) are utilized to the extent of 50% to 60% of their
capacity. Some of the hospitals and dispensaries run by the Welfare
Organisation of the Central Government have become defunct. It is possible to
extend the ESIC medical facilities available to the beedi, mica, iron ore,
manganese ore, dolomite and cinema workers who are presently covered by the
welfare schemes by transfer of funds by the Welfare Organisation to the ESIC to
meet the pro-rata expenditure incurred. This will result in a synergy between
these two organizations and the workers will be the ultimate beneficiaries.

The implementation of the Building & Other Construction Workers Act

leaves much to be desired. If this is implemented in a mission mode, the cess
collected could be effectively utilized to provide the social security benefits to this
big chunk of workers which is in the informal sector. The Welfare Fund
Organisation can increase its activities with the same infrastructure to cover
handloom workers and salt workers – both are identifiable groups. Cess can be
imposed on handloom cloth sold and similarly cess can be imposed on the sale
of industrial salt – both on ad valorem basis. The accrued money could be
fruitfully utilized to provide housing, education and medical benefits to these workers.
As has been elucidated earlier, Kerala State has covered several
categories of workers under the State level welfare schemes. Other States can
also follow suit after studying the Kerala model. It is necessary for the new
States to avoid the pitfalls and build on the strengths of the Kerala model
because especially as in some of the welfare funds, the administration cost is
very high whereas in some others it is marginal.

(iii) Drafting of a comprehensive Bill on Unorganized Sector Workers’ Welfare

In an earlier chapter, efforts made to draft a Bill on unorganized sector

workers’ has been mentioned. As this Bill did not find support from the trade
unions and employers, the Government decided to introduce an Unorganized
Sector Workers Welfare Scheme in 50 districts only on a pilot basis. The
following steps are required to make the scheme acceptable to the social
partners and beneficial to the workers concerned:

(a) Beneficiary oriented study based on a random sampling method

has to be conducted in different parts of the country by an
independent agency to give a proper feedback to the decision
making authority to enable it to structure the scheme properly,
and make it viable.
(b) The draft scheme has to be extensively discussed with the
(i) Trade union organizations
(ii) NGOs
(iii) Employers’ Organisations
(iv) Academicians
(v) Political parties and also
(vi) State Governments and also
(vii) Actuaries
Based on the above, a comprehensive scheme has to be prepared and
implemented. After gaining some experience, a comprehensive Bill should be
introduced in the Parliament.

(iv) Resolution of the problems of informal sector enterprises

The United Progressive Alliance Government had committed in its

Common Minimum Programme to set up a National Commission on Enterprises
in the Unorganized/Informal Sector. Accordingly, the Government has set up on
20th September, 2004, the National Commission on Enterprises in the
Unorganized/Informal Sector as an advisory body and a watchdog for the
informal sector.
The Commission will recommend measures considered necessary for
bringing about improvement in the productivity of these enterprises, generating
large scale employment opportunities on a sustainable basis, particularly in the
rural areas, enhancing the competitiveness of the sector in the emerging global
environment, linking of the sector with the institutional frame work in areas such
as credit, raw materials, infrastructure, technology upgradation and the marketing
and formulation of suitable arrangements for skill development.

“While addressing the Governors of the States, the Prime Minister,

Manmohan Singh remarked, “There is a need to make our growth process more
inclusive; to ensure that the marginalized and weaker sections benefit from
income growth; and to ensure that social infrastructure, particularly in health and
education improved.” (The Hindu, 16.06.2005)

Employment

Today there are 550 million people who work, but still live on less than US
$1 a day. These “working poor” represent 20 per cent of total world employment.
In spite of the record levels of global unemployment, the reality for most of the
world’s poor is that they must work – often for long hours, in poor working
conditions and without basic rights and representation – in jobs that are not
productive enough to enable them to lift themselves and their families out of
poverty. While it is clear that employment is central to poverty reduction, it is
“decent and productive” employment that matters, not employment alone.

This employment challenge has taken center stage in the globalcommunity, most
recently in the Report of the World Commission on the Social Dimension of
Globalization, which drew attention to the need to make decent and productive
employment a central objective of macro-economic and social policies as a key
endeavour to promote fairer globalization. Also, the centrality of decent employment
reaching the United Nations’ Millennium Development Goals, particularly in having the
share of those in extreme poverty in the total population by 2015, is widely accepted
and becoming more and more integrated as a component of national policy.

The World Employment Report shows that bridging the “global productivity
divide”, particularly in parts of the economy where the majority of people work –
such as in agriculture, small-scale enterprises or the urban informal economy – is
essential for fighting poverty and stimulating growth in both output and “decent
and productive” employment. Decent work has many components; the
fundamentally economic one of an income adequate enough to escape from
poverty must ultimately come from growth – growth in output, growth in
productivity, and growth in jobs. (World Employment Report – 2004-05).

Slower Growth of Employment: A Major Limiting Factor

India’s growing labour surplus has been a keenly debated aspect of the
country’s development dilemmas. Various committees appointed by the
Government of India have investigated the key issues relating to the growth of
employment and unemployment.
Food for Work Programme

The Food Corporation of India (FCI) procures rice and wheat on a

massive scale during the harvest season. Whatever quantity comes to the
mandies (whole-sale markets) is procured provided these grains conform to fair
average quality at the support price fixed by the Government on an annual basis.
Accordingly, the granaries of FCI are overflowing. Equitable distribution of food
grains between different districts of the country does not take place due to lack of
purchasing power, especially amongst the rural people in the poorest pockets. In
September, 2004, the Prime Minister launched the Food for Work Progamme in
Andhra Pradesh. The programme covers 150 poor districts of the country
wherein part of the wages for those workers who are engaged in asset creation
would be paid in the form of food. Therefore, the Food For Work Programme is a
boon to the unemployed as well as working poor in these districts. This is a first
step towards the National Employment Guarantee Programme.

National Employment Guarantee Programme

The first pledge of the Common Minimum Programme (CMP) reads: “The
UPA government will immediately enact a National Employment Guarantee Act.
This will provide a legal guarantee for at least 100 days of employment to begin
with on asset-creating public works programmes every year at minimum wages
for at least one able-bodied person in every rural, urban poor and lower middleclass
household”.

ILO Chief backs job guarantee programme

Endorsing the Common Minimum Programme’s proposal for a National

Employment Guarantee Programme, the Director-General of International Labour
Organization, Juan Somavia, said in an interview to ‘The Hindu􀂶 that India has
the potential to achieve “a real breakthrough internationally” with its promise of
“more inclusive” growth. Mr. Somavia said that the point of departure for any
discussion on poverty and growth had to be “the fact that global policies today
are not producing employment.”

Calling for a change in the way the success of economic policy is

measured, he said: “Today, growth is the main thing but growth is not sufficient
because as the example of India and other parts of the world shows, you have
jobless growth. So why not change the criterion of success to job creation and
basic social protection?” Once this baseline is laid out, a country should
organize its policies to serve this goal. “Of course you want growth, sound
macro-management and low inflation for providing employment. But we need the
policies to converge towards the goal of employment.”

Asked about the proposed Employment Guarantee Act, Mr. Somavia said
this approach has enormous potential. The CMP, he said, reflected the general
aspirations of the Indian people. On the controversy surrounding the cost of
implementing the employment guarantee scheme, the ILO director general
acknowledged that implementation would not be easy. “But unless you set
objectives, like the CMP does, things won’t happen.”

National Employment Guarantee Bill

The Finance Minister in his budget speech (2004) has also announced
that the Government would introduce bring a National Employment Bill to provide
for a legal guarantee for at least 100 days of employment in asset creating/works
programmes every year at minimum wages for at least one able-bodied adult
person in every rural/urban poor and lower middle class household who
volunteers himself/herself to do any kind of unskilled manual work in rural/urban
areas in the country. This Bill titled “The National Rural Employment Guarantee
Bill, 2004” (Bill 106 of 2004) has since been introduced in the Lok Sabha by the
Minister for Rural Development on 21.12.2004. It has been referred to the
Standing Committee of the Parliament.

As the Bill suffers from severe lacunae, it has to be transformed to meet

the desired objective of generation of adequate employment opportunities and
also to lift the workers above the poverty line by providing them decent work.

Accordingly –
(a) the workers have to be paid as per the Minimum Wages Act for
doing four categories of work – unskilled, skilled, semi-skilled and
highly skilled. There is no escape from this because the Supreme
Court has held that any industry which does not pay minimum
wages has no right to exist. Any asset creating work under NMEP
comes under the definition of industry under the I.D. Act. Further,
compliance with the provisions of the M.W. Act ensures decent work.
(b) Artificial restriction on the number of workers from a family has to
be done away with as only those who are in dire need would come for work.
(c) At least 100 days of work per year has to be provided.
(d) No distinction should be made between able bodied persons and
others as has been rightly advised by the National Human Rights
Commission
(e) Advance plan of action is to be prepared to identify and list out
productive asset creating works by involving institutions of local
self-government
(f) A synergy has to be built in between government departments,
NGOs and local Panchayats and lastly
(g) Urban areas have to be included.