Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 15 views

    Charpy Data

    Uploaded by

    Van Tinh Phan
    This document compares the absorbed energy of 1020 steel and 2024-T6 aluminum at different test conditions and temperatures. 1020 steel absorbed more energy than 2024-T6 aluminum at test conditions of 350°F, 68°F and 32°F, absorbing 43, 40 and 33 foot-pounds of energy respectively compared to 11, 10 and 10 foot-pounds for aluminum. At -346°F, aluminum absorbed slightly more energy (9 foot-pounds) than steel (1 foot-pound). A line graph shows absorbed energy generally increasing with temperature for both materials.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Charpy Data

    Uploaded by

    Van Tinh Phan
    15 views2 pages
    This document compares the absorbed energy of 1020 steel and 2024-T6 aluminum at different test conditions and temperatures. 1020 steel absorbed more energy than 2024-T6 aluminum at test conditions of 350°F, 68°F and 32°F, absorbing 43, 40 and 33 foot-pounds of energy respectively compared to 11, 10 and 10 foot-pounds for aluminum. At -346°F, aluminum absorbed slightly more energy (9 foot-pounds) than steel (1 foot-pound). A line graph shows absorbed energy generally increasing with temperature for both materials.

    Original Description:

    data

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document compares the absorbed energy of 1020 steel and 2024-T6 aluminum at different test conditions and temperatures. 1020 steel absorbed more energy than 2024-T6 aluminum at test conditions of 350°F, 68°F and 32°F, absorbing 43, 40 and 33 foot-pounds of energy respectively compared to 11, 10 and 10 foot-pounds for aluminum. At -346°F, aluminum absorbed slightly more energy (9 foot-pounds) than steel (1 foot-pound). A line graph shows absorbed energy generally increasing with temperature for both materials.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    15 views2 pages

    Charpy Data

    Uploaded by

    Van Tinh Phan
    This document compares the absorbed energy of 1020 steel and 2024-T6 aluminum at different test conditions and temperatures. 1020 steel absorbed more energy than 2024-T6 aluminum at test conditions of 350°F, 68°F and 32°F, absorbing 43, 40 and 33 foot-pounds of energy respectively compared to 11, 10 and 10 foot-pounds for aluminum. At -346°F, aluminum absorbed slightly more energy (9 foot-pounds) than steel (1 foot-pound). A line graph shows absorbed energy generally increasing with temperature for both materials.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 2

    1020 Steel 2024-T6 Aluminum

    Test Cond.Absorbed Energy Test Cond.Absorbed Energy


    350 43 350 11
    68 40 68 10
    32 33 32 10 50
    -346 1 -346 9
    45

    40

    35

    Absorbed Energy [f-lb]


    30

    25

    20

    15

    10

    0
    -400 -300 -200 -100

    Tempe
    50

    45

    40

    35

    30

    25
    1020 Steel
    20 2024-T6 Al umi num

    15

    10

    0
    -400 -300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300 400

    Temperature [°F]

    You might also like