Final Report - RTA
Final Report - RTA
Final Report - RTA
in service sector.
A Proposal submitted
By
To
Dr. Sania Usmani
In partial fulfilment of
The requirement for the
1.1 Background
organizations have proper HR department which not only control HRM but also
evaluating and studying daily operational activites and its related concerns in order to
management systems through which they can measure employee performance and make
more valued work with minimum workforce in order to have more profit and low cost for
an organization and also motivate skilled full workforce by introducing different types of
benefits i.e provident funds, EOBI, Social Security & Health and Group Life Insurance
etc. and HR also evaluate employees performance and if there are any employees in an
reward for them like issuance of employee of the month, employee of the year certificate
but due to lack of measuring tools majotiy of hardworking employees being neglected
which cause high turnover of employees within the particular organization. On the basis
management system and measure every individual employee performance with multiple
perspectives to make accurate results that would be helpful in making culture and office
environment more better and healthy for organizational growth (Azzone and Palermo,
2011).
modern world business couldn’t be operate effectively without well equipped technology
similarly HR work force can not be operated without advanced tools to measure
which is always focusing on employee related issues like medical, gratuity, performance
evaluations and leaves. Moreover, HR has to face generic issue which is concerned with
1. What financial and non-financial performance management system tools are used
1.4Significance of Study:
This study shows the importance of performance management systems tools which
Paul White (2015), demonstrates the human resource policies regarding employee appreciation
which can create motivated and dedicated workforce that leads organization towards success.
organization in order to develop recognition system for staff which increase producticity of
employees and if HR managers don’t consider all employees equally and compensate whole
workforce in the same way then chances of inequality may occur and can cause high turnovers.
Futhermore, author describes five different languages of appreciation for workplace in which
appreciation should be awarded in the way employees want to receive whether compensation
Michael Armstrong, Duncan Brown & Peter Reilly, (2011) explored that what is the reason
behind not to evaluate the usefulness of reward policies and practices in many organizations and
determines the process of those organizations which develops a model of evidence based
approached for reward management processes in organization, researcher stated in his research
that why evaluation of reward do and do not use in an organization, this study is all about
guidance which is provided to practioners that how they can measure reward policies and
practice’s effectiveness. This research demonstrate that there must be some kind of reward for
the employees when employee have proved themselves by fullfiling their targets specially in
sales department employees are given targets and company put a condition for the employees
that complete your target and get the suitable reward as as result of it so there should be evidence
between employees performance and external pressure that comes through environment.
each employee through identifying, determining and emerging performance with respect to
kind of micro HRM approach which consist of different types performance practices. However,
author demonstrates that PMS is inter related with multiple practices like reward management,
planning and monitoring that affects employees performance either positive or negative and this
appreciation towards their team members which motivates entire team for achieving
managers which tends to create dedication and motivational factor in order to attain higher
customers satisfaction and organization grows in purposive sense. Author also explores the
employee engagement programs that shows employees attitude towards organization culture and
employees during their training period and both managers and employees feels satisfied with
their job while getting valued for their contributions. This study of author has showed proper
mechanism to teach employers for proper communication way of appreciation to one another.
According to Cohanier (2014), qualitative research can tell us about the performance
management system with more better understanding of employees performance and organization
performance. Moreover, author focused on north american retailer where financial and non
financial performance measures are very crucial to measure because of its operations intensity
and it would be relevant for its shareholders to review performance of organization. However,
non financial performance measures have played significant role in developing study to evaluate
the employees performance towards their retail customers in terms of employee attitude towards
its customer, transaction time at cashier, customer complaints responsiveness and customer
purchasing frequency counts. Furthermore, conclusion of this paper suggests that these financial
and non financial PMS can be helpful to evaluate the organization as well as employee
Chapman and Kelliher (2011) describes the reward mix strategy in which relationship between
different level of rewards have been evaluated. One standard has led to development for rewards
mix program. Moreover, author determined both environmental and organizational factors such
as organization’s business and their HR strategy leads the reward system. Pay policies also
become part of reward strategy in terms of compensation against any particular activities that
leads organization to next level. Managers would consider many aspects while making policies
regarding reaward mix and decisions has to be made on basis of approved policies which
Commitment and reduce employee turnover. Authore Describe PMS facilitate newcomers
new hire affective, Performance Management system not only facilitate new hires but also
inspiration for newcomer long term achievement and career Growth. Furthermore Performance
Management system Demonstrate how to use multiple of HR practices which lead organization
outcomeslevels. PMS provide a open plateform for newcomers to enhance their capabilities and
interact openly.
Azzone and Palermo (2011), describes in this study of performance appraisal system of
organization and its reawards system that which factors should be considered in whole process.
Moreover, organizations have been faced very frequent change in its internal external
environment and managers have wanted to know the problem they have faced especially in
transforming the policies regarding appraisal and reward systems. Different approaches have
been used to evaluate this study in government scenario and adopted multiple theories to fix
issues.
3.1 Methodology
This particular report will be a qualitative study and exploratory methodolgy approach would be
used to analyze the financial and non financial performance management system which are being
specicifc study is about the service sector organizations like HR service providers, courier
services, hospitals, education and information technology sectors. Primary data collection
technique will be used in order to get appropriate answers with releavancy of this study.
Researchers are about to use purposive sampling technique to get accurate results for proper
interpretation of results.
As this study is about performance management systems of employees and organizations and
primary data collection technique will be used to gather siginificant data thorugh qualitative
procedures. For this particular case we will prepare a well designed questionnaire consisted of
multiple open ended questions which cause effective output or results pertain to our study.
This case will help us to describe the performance management systems to assess the overall
position of organization. For this purpose, data collection will be done through managers,
supervisors, and line managers of human resource departments of service sector organizations.
All the data collection will be done through interviews individualy with help of questionnaire
which consists of open ended questionaaire that covers overall information realted to this
particular case. (Saunders, Lewis, Thornhill, 2012). In this case , we will conduct structured
3.5 Participants
In this study of performance management systems, questionnaire has been designed to collect
data thourgh interviews and interviews will be conducted by mnultiple managers, line mangers
an supervisors of human resource department of service sector organizations. All participants are
from service sector organizations including schools, hospitals, human resource service providers
discussed performance management systems with them also talked about their financial and non-
financial performance management systems which are being used in their organization. In
following transcription of the interviews we used “Just the gist” and “conversation” and
having feedback from line managers / Supervisors regarding the performance of those employees
who are working under their supervision, feedback is taken on quarterly basis as well as, there is
a reward system for best performers in each units / department. Moreover he also informed that
Manager one of the service company said that “Company’s growth is totally depend on the
performance of employees and it is the task of department heads that how they can get best result
from employees by giving them plans and procedures to achieve desired objectives that benefits
not only the organization but also improve employees personal and professional growth and
there should be a motivation for the employees for their good work by appreciating or by
organization invest on them and get maximum profit by the help of their talented work.
Yeah…In our org. we’ve these types of system so far an..bt not necessary we are following all
procedures. Infact, our superviors made some policies regarding performance management
systems….in order to evaluate performance of their teams an…eventually they also evaluate
organization performance as well. Yes, mostly we use non financial systems bcz it is more
Being HR manager , I would like to explain regarding FPMS, in which we have overall growth
factor of organization which consist of profitability, asset turnovers, debt payoffs and revenue
generation for each quarter and these all are enough to evaluate org performance and NFPMS
has some crucks that shows how good your team mates work and do they awarded by org
according to their performance. As we have seen recently in our org. like employees should get
subsidize food or penny less which cause in increase of their productivity as a result of economic
support by org.
Interview 6 - Hospital
Yes, I am HR and Admin director who works for betterment of nation and serving this nation
from several years. I know what is good and bad for our patients and our employees. As our staff
is highly motivated and we don’t have to measure their performance but hmmmm…somehow we
can measure lower staff performance bcz their attitude and behavior towards our patients –
customers makes our hospital progress. Moreover, FPMS doesn’t have any relation with
Interview 7 - Hospital
Definitely, we have both systems for measuring performance of our employees which makes our
organization a better place to serve our country in a better way. Moreover, our staff is highly
qualified & motivated to serve the nation and our HR team conducts several workshops and
training seminars to enhance productivity and expertise of employees. Similarly, when our staff
performs good enough then financial stability of firm always grow significantly.
In order to make clients happy, we have pool of candidates for multiple positions and we supply
workforce to our client according to their need, our timely delivery to our client make us more
and more successful, for this we have qualified workforce that not only works for our clients in
efficient way but also gives us growth opportunity in terms of revenues. We have multiple
Taste makes perfection in our quality and all this comes from our workforce and for this we have
multiple ways to make and measure performances of them. In order to enhance this factor we
have strategies like motivation, reward management, appraisals based on performance, bonuses
Conclusion
According to interviews conducted in service sector industry of Pakistan which includes multiple
services provider like HR service providers, Schools, hospitals, restaurants, event management
services and others. In every organization there is an HR department where HR concerns with
the performance of organizations for which they evaluate employee performance because when
employees performs it reflects organization’s performance as well and both are integrated with
each other. Every company have different rewards systems to enhance their employees
Armstrong, M., Brown, D., & Reilly, P. (2011). Increasing the effectiveness of reward
Azzone, G., & Palermo, T. (2011). Adopting performance appraisal and reward systems: A qualitative
24(1), 90-111.
Cohanier, B. (2014). What qualitative research can tell us about performance management systems.
Chapman, J., &Kelliher, C. (2011). Influences on reward mix determination: reward consultants'
Saks, A., & A. Gruman, J. (2014). Making organizations more effective through organizational
White, P. (2015). Authentic appreciation creates a winning workforce: Focus on the individual and watch
the transformation take place. Human Resource Management International Digest, 23(1), 25-27.
White, P. (2016). Appreciation at Work training and the Motivating by Appreciation Inventory:
organization?
5. What is your opinion about financial and non financial performance management system
of an organization?
6. Describe in your words some financial and non financial performance measures which
8. What are the factors which should be part of NFPM in your organization.
9. What are the factors which should be part of FPM in your organization.
10. Which is better Financial performance management system or non financial performance
management system?
Thank You!