Adm of Secondary Evidence
Adm of Secondary Evidence
Adm of Secondary Evidence
Cases
sanatam mohanty v. baidhar raut1
If the original document is lost, destroyed, detained by the opponent or the third person who
does not produced it or physically immovable, secondary is admissible
kishori lal goswami v rakhal das Banerjee 2If the copy of document is admitted in evidence in
the first court without any objection no objection can be allowed to be taken in appeal court
as to its admissibility t
section 63(2) of the evidence act recognizes copies made from original by mechanical process
which ensure the accuracy of the copy as one of the categories= of the secondary evidence ‘in
the instant case the trail court did not express any doubt as to the authenticity of Xerox copy of
the document placed by petitioner had already called upon DW- 1 to produce the original and
there was no response to that, thereby a circumstance provided for thee section 65(a) of the act
emerged enabling the court to receive the secondary evidence ‘( amangenti prameela v .p
venkatreddy, 2004 (3) Andh LT 218
1
, A 1986 Ori 66
2
( 1903) 3 Cal 155
Where the accuracy of the copy is not disputed as such, photocopy sought to be proved in
evidence would fall under category of secondary evidence ( amutha beelarmine corera v. Elis
villavarayer, 2007 6 MLJ 893 (MDU- MAD)