Kinetic Properties of β-glucosidase/ Cellobiase from Aspergillus Niger
Kinetic Properties of β-glucosidase/ Cellobiase from Aspergillus Niger
Kinetic Properties of β-glucosidase/ Cellobiase from Aspergillus Niger
Ethan G. Parker
glucohydrolase, EC 3.2.1.21) have been determined. The Michaelis constants (Km) for
competitive inhibitor with inhibitor constants (Ki) of 1.7 mM when 4NPG is the substrate and 1
= 8 μM; 4NPG as substrate) while D-fructose exhibits little inhibition. Cellulose hydrolysis is
best fit in these conditions, which can be attributed to the activity of the β-D-glucosidase in this
residues in beta-D-glycosides and oligosaccharides, with release of glucose. These enzymes are
powerful tools for degradation of plant cell walls by pathogens and other organisms consuming
plant biomass. Cellulases break down the cellulose molecule into monosaccharides ("simple
polymers comprise three to ten monosaccharides. They are linked together mostly by O-
and the other). Cellulase is used for commercial food processing in coffee and performs
hydrolysis of cellulose during drying of beans. Furthermore, cellulases are widely used in textile
3
industry and in laundry detergents, have been used in the pulp and paper industry for various
purposes, and are even used for pharmaceutical applications. Cellulase is used in the
fermentation of biomass into biofuels, although this process is relatively experimental at present,
Cellulase is also used as a treatment for phytobezoars (a type of bezoar, or trapped mass in the
gastrointestinal system, that consists of components of indigestible plant material, such as fibres,
skins and seeds), a form of cellulose bezoar (a small stony concretion that may form in the
stomachs of certain animals, especially ruminants, and which was once used as an antidote for
various ailments) found in the human stomach. The purpose for this lab was to determine how
factors such as pH, temperature, substrate concentration, and inhibitors affect the reaction rate of
the enzyme, and what conditions are most suitable for it.
For the preliminary activity, first calibrate the spectrophotometer using a blank cuvette with 500
µL water and 500 µL of stop solution. Then, perform the general assay twice. To perform the
general assay, start by adding 500 µL of stop solution to a small cuvette. Add 0.45 mL of
microcentrifuge tube. Start a timer when the enzyme is added. Cap and gently mix the tubes.
After ten minutes, transfer o.5 mL from the microcentrifuge tube to the cuvette. Read the
Repeat the general assay using 0.45 mL of pH buffers 3 through 7 instead of the resuspension
buffer.
Temperature Studies
Use a similar procedure to test the effect of increasing temperature. Use the same amounts of
chemicals as in the general assay. Place the resuspension buffer and substrate solution in one
microfuge tube, and the enzyme in another microfuge tube. Incubate the tubes in a water bath at
the desired temperature for 5 minutes. Add the enzyme to the other microfuge tube, and start a
Use the same procedure as the general assay. Except add resuspension buffer and then add
substrate and water. Run trials from 0mL of substrate to 0.15mL of substrate, and add water to
Redo the increasing substrate activity with and without the inhibitor (30mM glucose). Choose a
few points from the increasing substrate studies to use. For the ones with inhibitors, add 50µL of
every gram of mushroom. Grind into a slurry. Scoop the slurry into a microcentrifuge tube.
Centrifuge it for about 2 minutes. Remove 1 mL of the supernatant and put it into a clean small
5
test tube. Add 3 mL of resuspension buffer to the supernatant, Mix gently. Use this suspension
RESULTS
a molecule that is made up of long chains of glucose in plant walls and is used as a way to
produce food by many fungi. Therefore it provokes the interest to many the conditions that best
suit the enzyme’s reaction rate of establishing a free reducing end. Such factors are pH,
The graph Figure 1 you will see on the next page is the General Assay that was used to
complete the other test. The purpose of the general assay that was completed first is to have a
general sense of how each of the studies was completed. When adding the 500 µL of stop
solution to a cuvette is to create a blank sample that is used to calibrate the spectrophotometer.
By doing this we are able to measure the amount of absorbance of light that the enzyme has
when performing later experiments. Another reason that we complete a general assay is to assure
that our R2 value is at a minimum of .95 to assure that our measurements are accurate and will
FIG. 1. General Assay Studies using 450 µL of the Resuspension Buffer, 105 µL of Substrate Solution, and 400 µL of the β-glucosidase Enzyme
Solution, and run through a spectrophotometer set a 410nm. Tested three times.
7
Based of the General Assay, our technique is something that needs to be improved as
pH Studies:
The optimal pH of an enzyme is the pH where the conditions best suit it, however can be
different for different areas of the organism. By changing the preferred pH that a certain enzyme
likes you could do one of three things. Optimal pH is determined by the activity that the enzyme
performs while still accounting for stability where one is a part of the enzyme, and one is the
enzyme as a whole. By changing the pH you could denature the protein in a way that it can not
work properly. Another possible outcome is that by with the wrong pH you will change or affect
the charge of the molecule’s hydrophilic groups. The third possible outcome is that by with the
wrong pH you change the conformation of the enzyme to a point where the Cellobiase is no
longer able to recognize or bind to the substrate. In Figure 2 you will note that we used four
different pHs (3,4,5,6,7) in comparison to their absorbance as a way to measure their activity and
stability.
8
9
According to Figure 2 our enzyme has an optimal pH of approximately 4.47 based on the
line that was given. With the pHs that were more acidic to this it is possible that they did one of
the three things that was mentioned earlier with the effects of pH on an enzyme. The same goes
for the pHs that we tested that were more basic. According to what we found online, the average
optimal pH for our specific enzyme is approximately at a 4.7pH. To calculate the where our
optimal pH was we used the equation y= -0.1349x^2+1.2052x-1.2667. A question that we are yet
to solve is what setting is this a optimal pH and if we tested it in other organisms like fungi, what
would it be then?
Temperature Studies:
similar way to the pH as it can change the activity of the enzyme along with the stability. It may
also change the conformation of the enzyme with the addition or subtraction if energy; though it
may be in a different conformation state, it might still be active before it is completely denatured.
In order to do this we made several different types of water baths, and followed through with the
general assay.*
10
11
With online resources we were able to determine that the optimal temperature for our
*Note that the graph is a straight line and at the end is still increasing. The reason for this is that
our group had difficulty at keeping the water bath that the enzyme was in at a specific
temperature, and did not yield results for temperatures higher than 49°C. Theoretically, figure
three should increase to the 50 and then after that begin to level off as we have denatured or
changed the conformation too much. Other questions that occur are what we might have done
The goal of the increasing substrate study is to determine the maximum velocity that the
enzyme can work at without becoming overwhelmed. The way that our group completed this
experiment was by increasing the concentration of the substrate. The substrate that was used in
all of these cases was p-Nitorphenyl glucopyranosidase. We were able to determine the general
concentration levels of these because as you increased the concentration, when adding it to the
stop solution, it would become a yellow color. The deeper the color, the higher amount of the
product that you made. Figures 4, and 5 below shows the results that we got for this part of the
procedure.
12
13
14
Inhibitor Studies:
The reason for completing this experiment is to determine if a source that we choose to
determining the rate at which the enzyme binds to the substrate, and through the translation
process becomes the enzyme and the product. This can commonly be shown in a the formula
E+S→ 𝐸𝑆 → 𝐸𝑃 → 𝐸 + 𝑃.
Both the results and the Lineweaver Burk graph are below in Figures 6 and 7.
15
16
17
For this study we isolated cellobiase from portobello mushrooms and repeated our increasing
substrate study using the enzyme retrieved from the mushroom. This was to determine the
differences between the pure enzyme and the one from an alternative source . As can be seen in
Figures 8 and 9.
18
19
The action of the enzyme peaked at a lower substrate concentration than the pure enzyme. The
enzyme from an alternative source peaked in its activity at approximately 0.13 mM concentration
of substrate.
DISCUSSION
Through our studies we were able to determine many of the factors that impact the reaction rate
of the enzyme cellobiase. We found the optimum pH of cellobiase as well as the optimum
temperature and substrate concentration. Our study showed 4.7 to be the optimal pH for
cellobiase. Unfortunately, due to many errors in our methods, we were not able to determine
accurate values for the optimal temperature and substrate concentration. By finding these we
were able to determine the effects on the enzyme if requirements were not met, and how it was
affected. With the inhibitors studies we were able to conclude that glucose was a competitive
Due to many issues with our methods, we got very inaccurate and incomplete data for some of
the studies. Our temperature study did not include a aide enough range of temperatures, and our
data for the inhibitor study was bizarre. Our increasing substrate study did not test quite enough
values of substrate concentration. Ideally, in the future, we would be able to repeat many of these
studies with more time. If we had more time to complete the studies, we could be more careful
and more accurate in our studies. We would like to test a more complete range of values for all
of these studies.
20
RESOURCES
Peneva, Petrana. A Study of the Enzyme Beta-glucosidase. Ithaca, NY: n.p., 1937. Print.
Hu, A.s.l., R. Epstein, H.o. Halvorson, and R.m. Bock. "Yeast β-glucosidase:
Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 91.2 (1960): 210-18. Web. 29 Apr. 2016.