REPORT On Venture Capital
REPORT On Venture Capital
REPORT On Venture Capital
ON
“Study of Venture Capital
in India and its Aspects”
Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirement of MBA Degree of
Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak
Every study is incomplete without having a well plan and concrete exposure to the
student. Management studies are not exception. Scope of the project at this level is
very wide ranging. On the other hand it provide sound basis to adopt the theoretical
knowledge and on the other hand it gives an opportunities for exposure to real time
situation.
This study is an internal part of our MBA program and to do this project in a short
period was a heavy task.
Intention, dedication, concentration and hard work are very much essential to
complete any task. But still it needs a lot of support, guidance, assistance, co-
operation of people to make it successful.
I bear to imprint of my people who have given me, their precious ideas and times to
enable me to complete the research and the project report. I want to thanks them for
their continuous support in my research and writing efforts.
I would also like to acknowledge my parents and my batch mates for their guidance
and blessings
A number of technocrats are seeking to set up shop on their own and capitalize on
opportunities. In the highly dynamic economic climate that surrounds us today, few
‘traditional’ business models may survive. Countries across the globe are realizing
that it is not the conglomerates and the gigantic corporations that fuel economic
growth any more. The essence of any economy today is the small and medium
enterprises. For example, in the US, 50% of the exports are created by companies
with less than 20 employees and only 7% are created by companies with 500 or more
employees. This growing trend can be attributed to rapid advances in technology in
the last decade. Knowledge driven industries like InfoTech, health-care,
entertainment and services have become the cynosure of bourses worldwide. In these
sectors, it is innovation and technical capability that are big business-drivers. This is a
paradigm shift from the earlier physical production and ‘economies of scale’ model.
However, starting an enterprise is never easy. There are a number of parameters that
contribute to its success or downfall. Experience, integrity, prudence and a clear
understanding of the market are among the sought after qualities of a promoter.
However, there are other factors, which lie beyond the control of the entrepreneur.
Prominent among these is the timely infusion of funds. This is where the venture
capitalist comes in, with money, business sense and a lot more.
Jane Koloski Morris, editor of the well known industry publication, Venture
Economics, defines venture capital as 'providing seed, start-up and first stage
financing' and also 'funding the expansion of companies that have already
demonstrated their business potential but do not yet have access to the public
securities market or to credit oriented institutional funding sources.
Venture capital investing has grown from a small investment pool in the 1960s and
early 1970s to a mainstream asset class that is a viable and significant part of the
institutional and corporate investment portfolio. Recently, some investors have been
referring to venture investing and buyout investing as "private equity investing." This
term can be confusing because some in the investment industry use the term "private
equity" to refer only to buyout fund investing. In any case, an institutional investor
will allocate 2% to 3% of their institutional portfolio for investment in alternative
assets such as private equity or venture capital as part of their overall asset allocation.
Currently, over 50% of investments in venture capital/private equity comes from
institutional public and private pension funds, with the balance coming from
endowments, foundations, insurance companies, banks, individuals and other entities
who seek to diversify their portfolio with this investment class.
In truth, venture capital and private equity firms are pools of capital, typically
organized as a limited partnership that invests in companies that represent the
opportunity for a high rate of return within five to seven years. The venture capitalist
may look at several hundred investment opportunities before investing in only a few
selected companies with favorable investment opportunities. Far from being simply
passive financiers, venture capitalists foster growth in companies through their
involvement in the management, strategic marketing and planning of their investee
companies. They are entrepreneurs first and financiers second.
Even individuals may be venture capitalists. In the early days of venture capital
investment, in the 1950s and 1960s, individual investors were the archetypal venture
2. Potential for Capital Gain An above average rate of return of about 30 - 40% is
required by venture capitalists. The rate of return also depends upon the stage of the
business cycle where funds are being deployed. Earlier the stage, higher is the risk
and hence the return.
4. Owner's Financial Stake The financial resources owned & committed by the
entrepreneur/ owner in the business including the funds invested by family, friends
and relatives play a very important role in increasing the viability of the business. It is
an important avenue where the venture capitalist keeps an open eye.
The modern venture capital industry began taking shape in the post – World War II
years. It is often said that people decide to become entrepreneurs because they see
role models in other people who have become successful entrepreneurs. Much the
same thing can be said about venture capitalists. The earliest members of the
organized venture capital industry had several role models, including these three:
J.H. Whitney & Co also formed in 1946, one of whose early hits was Minute Maid
juice. Jock Whitney is considered one of the industry’s founders.
In the mid-1950s, the U.S. federal government wanted to speed the development of
advanced technologies. In 1957, the Federal Reserve System conducted a study that
concluded that a shortage of entrepreneurial financing was a chief obstacle to the
development of what it called "entrepreneurial businesses." As a response this a
number of Small Business Investment Companies (SBIC) were established to
"leverage" their private capital by borrowing from the federal government at below-
market interest rates. Soon commercial banks were allowed to form SBICs and within
four years, nearly 600 SBICs were in operation.
At the same time a number of venture capital firms were forming private partnerships
outside the SBIC format. These partnerships added to the venture capitalist’s toolkit,
by offering a degree of flexibility that SBICs lack. Within a decade, private venture
capital partnerships passed SBICs in total capital under management.
The 1960s saw a tremendous bull IPO market that allowed venture capital firms to
demonstrate their ability to create companies and produce huge investment returns.
For example, when Digital Equipment went public in 1968 it provided ARD with
101% annualized Return on Investment (ROI). The US$70,000 Digital invested to
start the company in 1959 had a market value of US$37mn. As a result, venture
capital became a hot market, particularly for wealthy individuals and families.
However, it was still considered too risky for institutional investors.
In the 1970s, though, venture capital suffered a double-whammy. First, a red-hot IPO
market brought over 1,000 venture-backed companies to market in 1968, the public
markets went into a seven-year slump. There were a lot of disappointed stock market
investors and a lot of disappointed venture capital investors too. Then in 1974, after
Congress legislation against the abuse of pension fund money, all high-risk
investment of these funds was halted. As a result of poor public market and the
pension fund legislation, venture capital fund raising hit rock bottom in 1975.
Well, things could only get better from there. Beginning in 1978, a series of
legislative and regulatory changes gradually improved the climate for venture
The late 1980s marked the transition of the primary source of venture capital funds
from wealthy individuals and families to endowment, pension and other institutional
funds. The surge in capital in the 1980s had predictable results. Returns on venture
capital investments plunged. Many investors went into the funds anticipating returns
of 30% or higher. That was probably an unrealistic expectation to begin with. The
consensus today is that private equity investments generally should give the investor
an internal rate of return something to the order of 15% to 25%, depending upon the
degree of risk the firm is taking.
However, by 1990, the average long-term return on venture capital funds fell below
8%, leading to yet another downturn in venture funding. Disappointed families and
institutions withdrew from venture investing in droves in the 1989-91 periods. The
economic recovery and the IPO boom of 1991-94 have gone a long way towards
reversing the trend in both private equity investment performance and partnership
commitments.
In 1998, the venture capital industry in the United States continued its seventh
straight year of growth. It raised US$25bn in committed capital for investments by
venture firms, who invested over US$16bn into domestic growth companies US firms
have traditionally been the biggest participants in venture deals, but non-US venture
investment is growing. In India, venture funding more than doubled from $420
million in 2002 to almost $1 billion in 2003. For the first half of 2004, venture capital
investment rose 32% from 2003.
Investment Philosophy
Project Report – Institute of Technology and Management, Gurgaon
Venture capitalists can be generalists, investing in various industry sectors, or various
geographic locations, or various stages of a company’s life. Alternatively, they may
be specialists in one or two industry sectors, or may seek to invest in only a localized
geographic area.
Not all venture capitalists invest in "start-ups." While venture firms will invest in
companies that are in their initial start-up modes, venture capitalists will also invest in
companies at various stages of the business life cycle. A venture capitalist may invest
before there is a real product or company organized (so called "seed investing"), or
may provide capital to start up a company in its first or second stages of development
known as "early stage investing." Also, the venture capitalist may provide needed
financing to help a company grow beyond a critical mass to become more successful
("expansion stage financing").
The venture capitalist may invest in a company throughout the company’s life cycle
and therefore some funds focus on later stage investing by providing financing to help
the company grow to a critical mass to attract public financing through a stock
offering. Alternatively, the venture capitalist may help the company attract a merger
or acquisition with another company by providing liquidity and exit for the
company’s founders.
At the other end of the spectrum, some venture funds specialize in the acquisition,
turnaround or recapitalization of public and private companies that represent
favorable investment opportunities.
There are venture funds that will be broadly diversified and will invest in companies
in various industry sectors as diverse as semiconductors, software, retailing and
restaurants and others that may be specialists in only one technology.
While high technology investment makes up most of the venture investing in the
U.S., and the venture industry gets a lot of attention for its high technology
investments, venture capitalists also invest in companies such as construction,
industrial products, business services, etc. There are several firms that have
specialized in retail company investment and others that have a focus in investing
only in "socially responsible" start-up endeavors.
Since most of the ventures financed through this route are in new areas (worldwide
venture capital follows "hot industries" like InfoTech, electronics and biotechnology),
the probability of success is very low. All projects financed do not give a high return.
Some projects fail and some give moderate returns. The investment, however, is a
long-term risk capital as such projects normally take 3 to 7 years to generate
substantial returns. Venture capitalists offer "more than money" to the venture and
seek to add value to the investee unit by active participation in its management. They
monitor and evaluate the project on a continuous basis.
The venture capitalist is however not worried about failure of an investee company,
because the deal which succeeds, nets a very high return on his investments – high
enough to make up for the losses sustained in unsuccessful projects. The returns
generally come in the form of selling the stocks when they get listed on the stock
exchange or by a timely sale of his stake in the company to a strategic buyer. The idea
is to cash in on an increased appreciation of the share value of the company at the
time of disinvestment in the investee company. If the venture fails (more often than
not), the entire amount gets written off. Probably, that is one reason why venture
capitalists assess several projects and invest only in a handful after careful scrutiny of
the management and marketability of the project.
To conclude, a venture financier is one who funds a start up company, in most cases
promoted by a first generation technocrat promoter with equity. A venture capitalist is
not a lender, but an equity partner. He cannot survive on minimalism. He is driven by
maximization: wealth maximization. Venture capitalists are sources of expertise for
Length of investment:
Venture capitalists will help companies grow, but they eventually seek to exit the
investment in three to seven years. An early stage investment make take seven to ten
years to mature, while a later stage investment many only take a few years, so the
appetite for the investment life cycle must be congruent with the limited partnerships’
appetite for liquidity. The venture investment is neither a short term nor a liquid
investment, but an investment that must be made with careful diligence and expertise.
4. Second Stage In the Second Stage of Financing working capital is provided for
the expansion of the company in terms of growing accounts receivable and inventory.
Equity: All VCFs in India provide equity but generally their contribution does not
exceed 49 percent of the total equity capital. Thus, the effective control and majority
ownership of the firm remains with the entrepreneur. They buy shares of an enterprise
with an intention to ultimately sell them off to make capital gains.
Conditional Loan: It is repayable in the form of a royalty after the venture is able
to generate sales. No interest is paid on such loans. In India, VCFs charge royalty
ranging between 2 to 15 percent; actual rate depends on other factors of the venture
such as gestation period, cost-flow patterns, riskiness and other factors of the
enterprise.
They are only interested in ventures with high growth potential. Only ventures with
high growth potential are capable of providing the return that venture capitalists
expect, and structure their businesses to expect. Because many businesses cannot
create the growth required having an exit event within the required timeframe,
venture capital is not suitable for everyone.
Many venture capitalists try to mitigate this problem through diversification. They
invest in companies in different industries and different countries so that the
systematic risk of their total portfolio is reduced. Others concentrate their investments
in the industry that they are familiar with. In either case, they work on the assumption
that for every ten investments they make, two will be failures, two will be successful,
and six will be marginally successful. They expect that the two successes will pay for
the time given to, and risk exposure of the other eight. In good times, the funds that
do succeed may offer returns of 300 to 1000% to investors.
Most venture capital funds have a fixed life of ten years—this model was pioneered
by some of the most successful funds in Silicon Valley through the 1980s to invest in
technological trends broadly but only during their period of ascendance, to cut
exposure to management and marketing risks of any individual firm or its product.
In such a fund, the investors have a fixed commitment to the fund that is "called
down" by the VCs over time as the fund makes its investments. In a typical venture
capital fund, the VCs receive an annual "management fee" equal to 2% of the
committed capital to the fund and 20% of the net profits of the fund. Because a fund
may run out of capital prior to the end of its life, larger VCs usually have several
overlapping funds at the same time—this lets the larger firm keep specialists in all
stage of the development of firms almost constantly engaged. Smaller firms tend to
thrive or fail with their initial industry contacts—by the time the fund cashes out, an
entirely new generation of technologies and people is ascending, whom they do not
know well, and so it is prudent to re-assess and shift industries or personnel rather
than attempt to simply invest more in the industry or people it already knows
risky idea, they provide funds (a) if one needs additional capital to expand his
existing business or one has a new & promising project to exploit (b) if one cannot
obtain a conventional loan the requirement terms would create a burden during the
It is the ambition of many talented people in India to set up their own venture if they
could get adequate & reliable support. Financial investment provides loans & equity.
But they do not provide management support, which is often needed by
entrepreneurs. But the venture capital industries provide such support along with
capital also. Venture capitalist acts a partner not a financier.
be for our course, as hobby, for passing our time, to find out genuine solution for any
problem or to draw out certain inferences out of the available data. The objectives of
my study are:
Objective No. 1
To Find out the venture capital investment
volume in India
Methods of Financing
Rs million
7,000.00 6,318.12
6,000.00
5,000.00
4,000.00
3,000.00 2,154.46
2,000.00
873.01 580.02
1,000.00 75.85
0.00
Convertible
Redeemable
Convertible
Shares
Instruments
Instruments
Equity
Preference
Shares
Other
Debt
Non
Interpretation This diagram shows the venture capital financing in equity share
and secondly they invest in redeemable preference shares to get higher returns.
Contributors of Funds
Interpretation This table shows the highest contribution of fund FII and secondly
AIFI to develop the Industry.
Rs million
4,500.00
3,813.00
4,000.00
3,338.99
3,500.00
3,000.00
2,500.00
1,825.77
2,000.00
1,500.00 963.2
1,000.00
500.00 59.5
0.00
Start-up Later stage Other early Seed stage Turnaround
stage financing
Interpretation This diagram shows the highest finance is received by the venture
in startup stage of any venture.
Industry Rs million
Industrial products, machinery 2,599.32
Computer Software 1,832
Consumer Related 1,412.74
Medical 623.8
Food, food processing 500.06
Other electronics 436.54
Tel & Data Communications 385.09
Biotechnology 376.46
Energy related 249.56
Computer Hardware 203.36
Miscellaneous 1,380.85
Total 10,000.46
Rs million
3,000.00 2,599.32
2,500.00
1,832
2,000.00
1,412.74 1,380.85
1,500.00
1,000.00 623.8 500.06
436.54 385.09 376.46
500.00 249.56 203.36
0.00
Medical
Energy related
Computer
Hardw are
Consumer
Communications
Biotechnology
products,
processing
electronics
Miscellaneous
Industrial
Computer
Softw are
Food, food
Related
Investment Rs million
Maharashtra 2,566
Tamil Nadu 1531
Andhra Pradesh 1372
Gujarat 1102
Karnataka 1046
West Bengal 312
Haryana 300
Delhi 294
Uttar Pradesh 283
Madhya Pradesh 231
Kerala 135
Goa 105
Rajasthan 87
Punjab 84
Orissa 35
Dadra & Nagar Haveli 32
Himachal Pradesh 28
Pondicherry 22
Bihar 16
Overseas 413
Total 9994
3,000 2,566
2,500
2,000
1531
1372
1,500 1102 1046
1,000
500 312 300 294
Venture capital funds are broadly of two kinds - generalists or specialists. It is critical
for the company to access the right type of fund, ie who can add value. This backing
is invaluable as focused/specialized funds open doors, assist in future rounds and help
in strategy. Hence, it is important to choose the right venture capitalist.
The standard parameters used by venture capitalists are very similar to any
investment decision. The only difference being exit. If one buys a listed security, one
can exit at a price but with an unlisted security, exit becomes difficult. The key
factors which they look for in
The Management
Most businesses are people driven, with success or failure depending on the
performance of the team. It is important to distinguish the entrepreneur from the
professional management team. The value of the idea, the vision, putting the team
together, getting the funding in place is amongst others, some key aspects of the role
of the entrepreneur. Venture capitalists will insist on a professional team coming in,
including a CEO to execute the idea. One-man armies are passe. Integrity and
commitment are attributes sought for. The venture capitalist can provide the strategic
vision, but the team executes it. As a famous Silicon Valley saying goes "Success is
execution, strategy is a dream".
The Idea
The idea and its potential for commercialization are critical. Venture funds look for a
scalable model, at a country or a regional level. Otherwise the entire game would be
reduced to a manpower or machine multiplication exercise. For example, it is very
easy for Hindustan Lever to double sales of Liril - a soap without incremental capex,
Valuation
All investment decisions are sensitive to this. An old stock market saying "Every
stock is a buy at a price and vice versa". Most deals fail because of valuation
expectation mismatch. In India, while calculating returns, venture capital funds will
take into account issues like rupee depreciation, political instability, which adds to the
risk premia, thus suppressing valuations. Linked to valuation is the stake, which the
fund takes. In India, entrepreneurs are still uncomfortable with the venture capital
"taking control" in a seed stage project.
Exit
Without exit, gains cannot be booked. Exit may be in the form of a strategic sale
or/and IPO. Taxation issues come up at the time. Any fund would discuss all exit
options before closing a deal. Sometimes, the fund insists on a buy back clause to
ensure an exit.
Portfolio Balancing
Most venture funds try and achieve portfolio balancing as they invest in different
stages of the company life cycle. For example, a venture capital has invested in a
portfolio of companies predominantly at seed stage; they will focus on expansion
stage projects for future investments to balance the investment portfolio. This would
enable them to have a phased exit. In summary, venture capital funds go through a
certain due diligence to finalize the deal. This includes evaluation of the management
team, strategy, execution and commercialization plans. This is supplemented by legal
and accounting due diligence, typically carried out by an external agency. In India,
the entire process takes about 6 months. Entrepreneurs are advised to keep that in
mind before looking to raise funds. The actual cash inflow might get delayed because
of regulatory issues. It is interesting to note that in USA, at times angels write checks
across the table.
The Indian banking system has shown remarkable growth over the last two decades.
The rapid growth and increasing complexity of the financial markets, especially the
capital market have brought about measures for further development and
improvement in the working of these markets. Banks and development financial
institutions led by ICICI, IDBI and IFCI were providers of term loans for funding
projects. The options were limited to conventional businesses, i.e. manufacturing
centric. Services sector was ignored because of the "collateral" issue.
Equity was raised from the capital markets using the IPO route. The bull markets of
the 90s, fuelled by Harshad Mehta and the FIIs, ensured that (ad) venture capital was
easily available. Manufacturing companies exploited this to the full.
The services sector was ignored, like software, media, etc. Lack of understanding of
these sectors was also responsible for the same. If we look back to 1991 or even 1992,
the situation as regards financial outlay available to Indian software companies was
poor. Most software companies found it extremely difficult to source seed capital,
working capital or even venture capital.
RESEARCH DESIGN:
Acc. to Kerlinger, “Research design is the plan structure & strategy of
investigation conceived so as to obtain answers to research questions and to control
variance.
Acc. to Green and Tull, “A research design is the specification of methods
and procedures for acquiring the information needed. It is the overall operational
pattern or framework of the project that stipulates what information is to be collected
from which sources by what procedures.
Its found that research design is purely and simply the framework for a study that
guides the collection and analysis of required data.
Research design is broadly classified into
Exploratory research design
Descriptive research design
Casual research design
This research is a Exploratory research. The major purpose of this research is
description of state of affairs as it exists at present.
Secondary data is the data which is already collected by someone and complied for
different purposes which are used in research for this study. It includes:-
Internet
Magazine
Journal
Newspaper
The Indian Venture Capital Industry has followed the classical model of venture
capital finance. The early stage financing which includes seeds, startup & early stage
investment was always the major part of the total investment. Whenever venture
capitalists invest in venture certain basic preference play a crucial role in investment
decision. Two such considerations are location preferences and ownership
preferences. Seed stage finance is provided to new companies for the use in product
development & initial marketing company may be in the process of setting up the
business or may be in the business for short period but have not reach the stage of
commercialization.
The industry should concentrate more an early stage business opportunities instead of
later stage. It is the experience world over and especially in the United states of
America that the early stage opportunities have generated exceptional for the
industry. It is recommended that the venture capitalists should retain their basic
feature that taking retain their basic feature that is taking high risk. The present
situation may compel venture capitalists to opt for less risky opportunities but it is
against the sprit of venture capitalism. The established fact is big gains are possible in
high risk projects.
There has been a plethora of literature on venture capital finance, which is helping the
practitioners’ viz., venture capital finance companies and fund manage for better
understanding the role of venture capital in economic development. There are number
of studies on the venture capital and activities of venture capitalists in developed
countries.
Whenever Indian policy makers have to encourage any industry. The usual practice is
to grant that the industry tax breaks for a limited period. This definitely acts as a
positive incentive for that industry. However, what is required is a through
understanding of the industry requirement framing and implementation of aggregative
strategy for its development. VC funds are not even registered with SEBI in spite of
all the benefit available. VC industry is one, which will today prepare a base for a
strong tomorrow. What is need for the development of VC industry is not only tax
breaks but simpler procedures legislation for simplified exit form investment, more
transparency and legal backing to participate in business amongst other things.
Robbies, et. al. (1997) highlights the monitoring policies of funded units by venture
capitalists and studies the performance targets, monitoring information, and
monitoring actions through a questionnaire-based survey. The survey was
administered to 108 British Venture Capital Association members and total of 77
responses were gathered in the study. The findings related to performance targets and
other monitoring issues were considerable addition to the literature in the subject.
The issues concerning board of directors' role in venture backed companies
are widely debated topics in academic research. The findings of the study by Fried et.
al. (1998) emphasize that the board of directors are a more involved in the venture-
backed firms than boards where members do not have large ownership at stake. The
study provides an empirical evidence of variation in the boards' involvement and
shows its relevance in performance management of funded units.
1. Deal origination
2. Screening
3. Due diligence Evaluation
4. Deal structuring
5. Post-investment activity
6. Exit
Screening:
VCFs, before going for an in-depth analysis, carry out initial screening of all projects
on the basis of some broad criteria. For example, the screening process may limit
projects to areas in which the venture capitalist is familiar in terms of technology, or
product, or market scope. The size of investment, geographical location and stage of
financing could also be used as the broad screening criteria.
Due Diligence:
Due diligence is the industry jargon for all the activities that are associated with
evaluating an investment proposal. The venture capitalists evaluate the quality of
entrepreneur before appraising the characteristics of the product, market or
technology. Most venture capitalists ask for a business plan to make an assessment of
the possible risk and return on the venture. Business plan contains detailed
information about the proposed venture. The evaluation of ventures by VCFs in India
includes;
VCFs in India also make the risk analysis of the proposed projects which includes:
Product risk, Market risk, Technological risk and Entrepreneurial risk. The final
decision is taken in terms of the expected risk-return trade-off as shown in Figure.
Instrument Issues
Loan Clean vs secured
Interest bearing vs non interest bearing
convertible vs one with features (warrants)
1st Charge, 2nd Charge,
loan vs loan stock
Maturity
Preference shares redeemable (conditions under Company Act)
participating
par value
nominal shares
Warrants exercise price, expiry period
Common shares new or vendor shares
par value
partially-paid shares
In India, straight equity and convertibles are popular and commonly used. Nowadays,
warrants are issued as a tool to bring down pricing.
A variation that was first used by PACT and TDICI was "royalty on sales". Under
this, the company was given a conditional loan. If the project was successful, the
company had to pay a % age of sales as royalty and if it failed then the amount was
written off. In structuring a deal, it is important to listen to what the entrepreneur
wants, but the venture capital comes up with his own solution. Even for the proposed
investment amount, the venture capital decides whether or not the amount requested,
is appropriate and consistent with the risk level of the investment. The risks should be
Exit:
Venture capitalists generally want to cash-out their gains in five to ten years after the
initial investment. They play a positive role in directing the company towards
particular exit routes. A venture may exit in one of the following ways:
1. Initial Public Offerings (IPO’s)
2. Acquisition by another company
3. Purchase of the venture capitalist's shares by the promoter,
4. Purchase of the venture capitalist's share by an outsider
Till early 90s, under the license raj regime, only commodity centric businesses
thrived in a deficit situation. To fund a cement plant, venture capital is not needed.
What was needed was ability to get a license and then get the project funded by the
banks and DFIs. In most cases, the promoters were well-established industrial houses,
with no apparent need for funds. Most of these entities were capable of raising funds
from conventional sources, including term loans from institutions and equity markets.
Scalability
The Indian software segment has recorded an impressive growth over the last few
years and earns large revenues from its export earnings, yet our share in the global
market is less than 1 per cent. Within the software industry, the value chain ranges
from body shopping at the bottom to strategic consulting at the top. Higher value
addition and profitability as well as significant market presence take place at the
higher end of the value chain. If the industry has to grow further and survive the flux
it would only be through innovation. For any venture idea to succeed there should be
a product that has a growing market with a scalable business model. The IT industry
(which is most suited for venture funding because of its "ideas" nature) in India till
Mindsets
Venture capital as an activity was virtually non-existent in India. Most venture capital
companies want to provide capital on a secured debt basis, to established businesses
with profitable operating histories. Most of the venture capital units were offshoots of
financial institutions and banks and the lending mindset continued. True venture
capital is capital that is used to help launch products and ideas of tomorrow. Abroad,
this problem is solved by the presence of `angel investors’. They are typically wealthy
individuals who not only provide venture finance but also help entrepreneurs to shape
their business and make their venture successful.
There is a multiplicity of regulators like SEBI and RBI. Domestic venture funds are
set up under the Indian Trusts Act of 1882 as per SEBI guidelines, while offshore
funds routed through Mauritius follow RBI guidelines. Abroad, such funds are made
under the Limited Partnership Act, which brings advantages in terms of taxation. The
government must allow pension funds and insurance companies to invest in venture
capitals as in USA where corporate contributions to venture funds are large.
The exit routes available to the venture capitalists were restricted to the IPO route.
Before deregulation, pricing was dependent on the erstwhile CCI regulations. In
general, all issues were under priced. Even now SEBI guidelines make it difficult for
pricing issues for an easy exit. Given the failure of the OTCEI and the revised
guidelines, small companies could not hope for a BSE/ NSE listing. Given the dull
market for mergers and acquisitions, strategic sale was also not available.
Valuation
The recent phenomenon is valuation mismatches. Thanks to the software boom, most
promoters have sky high valuation expectations. Given this, it is difficult for deals to
reach financial closure as promoters do not agree to a valuation. This coupled with
the fancy for software stocks in the bourses means that most companies are preponing
their IPO’s. Consequently, the number and quality of deals available to the venture
funds gets reduced
[Source Pandey, I. M., Venture Capital – The Indian Express VIth Edition (2006)]
In a recent survey it has been shown that the VC investments in India's I.T. - Software
and services sector (including dot com companies)- have grown from US $ 150 million
in 1998 to over US$ 1200 million in 2008. The credit can be given to setting up of a
National Venture Capital Fund for the Software and I.T. Industry (NFSIT) in association
with various financial institutions of Small Industries and Development Bank of India
(SIDBI). The facts reveal that VC disbursements as on September 30, 2002 made by
NFSIT totaled Rs 254.36 mn.
Source www.evaluesevrve.com
A number of people in India feel that financial institution are not only
conservatives but they also have a bias for foreign technology & they do not trust
on the abilities of entrepreneurs.
www.indiainfoline.com
www.vcapital.com
www.investopedia.com
www.vcinstitute.com
Accede Partners
Austin Ventures
Atlas Venture
Battery Ventures
Benchmark Capital
Fidelity Ventures
Health Cap
Hummer Wimbled
Sequoia Capital
Trelys