The Mabalacat Sugar Co. took out a loan secured by a mortgage on its land and buildings, including machinery. It later bought additional machinery to increase capacity. BH Berkenkotter loaned money for the new machinery. The court held that [1] the original mortgage included future improvements and the new machinery, as they were essential to operating the sugar mill; [2] installing machinery permanently converted it to real property; and [3] an agreement not to further encumber the machinery did not change its character as part of the permanent structures.
The Mabalacat Sugar Co. took out a loan secured by a mortgage on its land and buildings, including machinery. It later bought additional machinery to increase capacity. BH Berkenkotter loaned money for the new machinery. The court held that [1] the original mortgage included future improvements and the new machinery, as they were essential to operating the sugar mill; [2] installing machinery permanently converted it to real property; and [3] an agreement not to further encumber the machinery did not change its character as part of the permanent structures.
The Mabalacat Sugar Co. took out a loan secured by a mortgage on its land and buildings, including machinery. It later bought additional machinery to increase capacity. BH Berkenkotter loaned money for the new machinery. The court held that [1] the original mortgage included future improvements and the new machinery, as they were essential to operating the sugar mill; [2] installing machinery permanently converted it to real property; and [3] an agreement not to further encumber the machinery did not change its character as part of the permanent structures.
The Mabalacat Sugar Co. took out a loan secured by a mortgage on its land and buildings, including machinery. It later bought additional machinery to increase capacity. BH Berkenkotter loaned money for the new machinery. The court held that [1] the original mortgage included future improvements and the new machinery, as they were essential to operating the sugar mill; [2] installing machinery permanently converted it to real property; and [3] an agreement not to further encumber the machinery did not change its character as part of the permanent structures.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1
B.H. Berkenkotter v. Cu Unjieng 61 Phil.
663
Facts:
Mabalacat Sugar Co., Inc., owner of the sugar central in Mabalacat,
Pampanga, obtained from Cu Unjieng e Hijos, a loan secured by a first mortgage constituted on two parcels and land "with all its buildings, improvements, sugar-cane mill, steel railway, telephone line, apparatus, utensils and whatever forms part or is necessary complement of said sugar- cane mill, steel railway, telephone line, now existing or that may in the future exist is said lots." Shortly after said mortgage had been constituted, the Mabalacat Sugar Co., Inc., bought additional machinery and equipment to increase the capacity
B.A. Green, its president, proposed to B.H. Berkenkotter, to advance the
necessary amount for the purchase of said machinery and equipment, promising to reimburse him as soon as he could obtain an additional loan from the Cu Unjieng e Hijos. B.A. Green applied to Cu Unjieng e Hijos for an additional loan of P75,000 offering as security the additional machinery and equipment acquired.
BH Berkenkotter claims the machinery and equipment was not
permanent in character, and that it would become security in case B.A. Green fails to obtain an additional loan from Cu Unjieng e Hijos. That B.A. Green bound himself not to mortgage nor encumber them to anybody.
Issue: Are the additional machines also included in the first mortgage?
Held:
Yes. The mortgage of a parcel of land generally includes all future
improvements that may be found on said parcel. These improvements include real properties, like the additional machines and sugar mill purchased. Said additional machinery are real properties because they are essential and principal elements of the sugar central. Without them, the sugar central would be unable to carry out its industrial purpose.
If the installation of the machinery and equipment in question in the
central of the Mabalacat Sugar Co., Inc., in lieu of the other of less capacity existing therein, for its sugar industry, converted them into real property by reason of their purpose, it cannot be said that their incorporation therewith was not permanent in character. Inasmuch as the central is permanent in character, the necessary machinery and equipment installed for carrying on the sugar industry for which it has been established must necessarily be permanent.
Moreover, that BA Green bound himself to BH Berkenkotter to hold them
as security for the payment of the latter's credit, and to refrain from mortgaging or otherwise encumbering them does not alter the permanent character of the said machinery and equipment with the central. The sale of the machinery and equipment does not vest BH Berkenkotter with ownership of said machinery and equipment but simply with the right of redemption.