Clinical Microbiology and Infection
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
Original article
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Objectives: Studies on treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in China are scarce. We
Received 30 March 2017 performed a study to investigate empiric antibiotic practices for patients hospitalized with CAP in China
Received in revised form and the risk factors for treatment failure.
18 September 2017
Methods: Data were collected from a national Chinese hospitalization database. Adult patients who were
Accepted 21 September 2017
Available online xxx
diagnosed with CAP between 1 October 2014 and 30 September 2015 were identified. We studied initial
empiric antibiotic regimens, microbiologic sampling, treatment failure, in-hospital mortality and length
Editor: Dr. M. Leeflang of hospital stay.
Results: We included 18 043 adult patients from 185 hospitals who met all the study inclusion criteria.
Keywords: The most common initial antibiotic regimen for CAP was monotherapy with a fluoroquinolone (14.8%,
Antibiotic therapy 2671/18 043). The most common initial antibiotic (used alone or in combination with other antibiotics)
Atypical pathogen covering was levofloxacin (15.7%, 4597/29 278 (this denominator represents the total number of initial antibi-
Community-acquired pneumonia otics)). The microbiologic sampling rate was 26.9% (4851/18 043). A total of 4050 (22.4%) of 18 043
Length of stay
patients experienced treatment failure. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that older age,
Treatment failure
male sex, coexisting lung cancer and use of regimens not covering atypical pathogens were risk factors
for treatment failure. In-hospital mortality was 2.1% (380/18 043). The median hospital length of stay was
11 days (interquartile range, 8e15 days).
Conclusions: Patients receiving Chinese guideline-adherent regimens had better outcomes, and atypical
pathogen active regimens were associated with a lower treatment failure rate and shorter length of
hospital stay. X.M. Nie, Clin Microbiol Infect 2017;▪:1
© 2017 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All
rights reserved.
Introduction developed its adult CAP guidelines in 2006 [3] and updated it in
2016 [4]. However, studies on treatment of CAP in China are scarce.
Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a common infectious Although most CAP patients are treated successfully in outpa-
disease worldwide. Many countries have devoted efforts to tient settings, about 25% require hospitalization in North America
improve the care of CAP patients, and some organizations and [5]. Even in hospitalized patients, initial antibiotics are almost al-
countries have developed CAP guidelines for adults [1,2]. China ways chosen empirically, as the causative pathogen is not known.
The 2016 Chinese CAP guidelines [4] recommend several regimens
as initial empiric antibiotics, depending on patient characteristics.
To our knowledge, there have been no studies on initial empiric
* Corresponding author. Y. Huang, Department of Respiratory and Critical Care, antibiotics for hospitalized CAP patients in China.
Changhai Hospital, the Second Military Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, The objective of our study was to examine antibiotic treat-
Shanghai, 200433, China. ment and microbiologic testing practices for hospitalized CAP
E-mail address: huangliur@163.com (Y. Huang).
y patients in China and identify areas which require greater
X.M. Nie, Y.S. Li and Z.W. Yang contributed equally to this article.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2017.09.014
1198-743X/© 2017 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Please cite this article in press as: Nie XM, et al., Initial empiric antibiotic therapy for community-acquired pneumonia in Chinese hospitals,
Clinical Microbiology and Infection (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2017.09.014
2 X.M. Nie et al. / Clinical Microbiology and Infection xxx (2017) 1e6
Methods
Please cite this article in press as: Nie XM, et al., Initial empiric antibiotic therapy for community-acquired pneumonia in Chinese hospitals,
Clinical Microbiology and Infection (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2017.09.014
X.M. Nie et al. / Clinical Microbiology and Infection xxx (2017) 1e6 3
Table 2
Three most common initial empiric antibiotic regimens for community-acquired pneumonia in China
Total Fluoroquinolone 14.8% (2671/18 043) Second-generation cephalosporin Cephalosporin/b-lactamase inhibitor 6.7% (1217/18 043)
10.6% (1909/18 043)
ICU Carbapenem 10.2% (229/2248) Cephalosporin/b-lactamase inhibitor Fluoroquinolone 7.0% (157/2248)
9.7% (218/2248)
Non-ICU Fluoroquinolone 15.9% (2514/15 795) Second-generation cephalosporin Third-generation cephalosporin 6.7% (1054/15 795)
11.6% (1831/15 795)
Teaching hospital Fluoroquinolone 26.2% (303/1157) Penicillin/b-lactamase inhibitor Cephalosporin/b-lactamase 7.5% (87/1157)
8.6% (100/1157)
Nonteaching hospital Fluoroquinolone 14.0% (2368/16 886) Second-generation cephalosporin Cephalosporin/b-lactamase inhibitor 6.7% (1130/16 886)
11.2% (1884/16 886)
Table 3
Three most common initial empiric antibiotic drugs for community-acquired pneumonia in China
Total Levofloxacin 15.7% (4597/29 278) Moxifloxacin 11.5% (3355/29 278) Piperacillin/tazobactam 5.1% (1485/29 278)
ICU Moxifloxacin 13.3% (528/3972) Imipenem/cilastatin 10.0% (398/3972) Levofloxacin 7.7% (306/3972)
Non-ICU Levofloxacin 17.0% (4291/25 306) Moxifloxacin 11.2% (2827/25 306) Azithromycin 5.1% (1298/25 306)
Teaching hospital Moxifloxacin 24.8% (441/1775) Cefoperazone/sulbactam 8.3% (147/1775) Piperacillin/tazobactam 6.4% (114/1775)
Nonteaching hospital Levofloxacin 16.4% (4509/27 503) Moxifloxacin 10.6% (2914/27 503) Piperacillin/tazobactam 5.0% (1371/27 503)
patients (25.8%, 580/2248). In our series, 20.3% (3660/18 043) of covering atypical pathogens were independent predictors of
patients received a regimen covering atypical pathogens. treatment failure. There was an interaction between ICU admission
A total of 4851 (26.9%) of 18 043 patients had at least one within 24 hours and adherence to Chinese guidelines. We further
microbiologic sample collected (Table 4). The sample collection rate analysed the individual effects of these two factors. Among non-ICU
was higher in teaching hospitals (49.5%, 573/1157) than in patients, compliance with the Chinese guidelines was associated
nonteaching hospitals (25.3%, 4278/16 886) (p < 0.0001). ICU pa- with a lower rate of treatment failure (p < 0.0001). However,
tients also had a higher collection rate (37.2%, 837/2248) than non- among ICU patients, compliance with the Chinese guidelines did
ICU patients (25.4%, 4014/15 795) (p < 0.0001). not predict treatment success (p ¼ 0.0529). Some literature sug-
A total of 4050 (22.4%) of 18 043 patients experienced treatment gests that the ratio of outcome events to independent variables in
failure. Univariate analysis of treatment failure is shown in Table 5. logistic regression should be 10:1 or higher. In our analysis, this
Logistic regression was used to analyse factors associated with ratio was 4050:12, which means the sample size of the logistic
treatment failure (Table 6). After adjustment for confounders, older regression analysis was sufficient. The ability of a logistic regression
age, male sex, coexisting lung cancer and use of a regimen not model to separate patients with different outcomes is known as
Please cite this article in press as: Nie XM, et al., Initial empiric antibiotic therapy for community-acquired pneumonia in Chinese hospitals,
Clinical Microbiology and Infection (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2017.09.014
4 X.M. Nie et al. / Clinical Microbiology and Infection xxx (2017) 1e6
Table 4 Table 6
Microbiologic sampling Multivariable logistic regression for treatment failure
Table 5
Univariate analysis of factors associated with treatment failure 10 vs. 12 days) and 1-day (median, 10 vs. 11 days) shorter LOS,
respectively (p < 0.0001).
Factor Failure rate p
Please cite this article in press as: Nie XM, et al., Initial empiric antibiotic therapy for community-acquired pneumonia in Chinese hospitals,
Clinical Microbiology and Infection (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2017.09.014
X.M. Nie et al. / Clinical Microbiology and Infection xxx (2017) 1e6 5
prospective research also supports atypical pathogen coverage, the while in hospital. Nonetheless, we likely have misclassified the
Chinese guidelines may need to be changed to recommend atypical initial empiric antibiotic regimens of some patients. In this retro-
coverage for all patients. spective study, patients admitted with hospital-acquired pneu-
The importance of TFAD for CAP has been debated. Two retro- monia may not be totally excluded. Considering that empiric
spective studies demonstrated statistically significantly lower coverage for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
mortality among patients who received early antibiotic therapy and Pseudomonas spp. is recommended in the IDSA/ATS hospital-
[16,17]. One study suggested that antibiotics be used within 8 hours acquired pneumonia guidelines [26], the use of antibiotics active
[16], whereas the other suggested 4 hours [17]. However, pro- against MRSA and Pseudomonas spp. may be overestimated in our
spective trials have not demonstrated a survival benefit of receiving study. Unfortunately, given the inherent limitations of the study
antibiotics within 4 to 8 hours [18,19]. Early antibiotic administra- database, we cannot calculate the overestimation.
tion does not appear to shorten the time to clinical improvement or In conclusion, in this novel study of initial empiric antibiotic
improve clinical outcomes [20,21]. On the basis of these prospec- therapy and patient outcomes of CAP in China, monotherapy with a
tive trials, the IDSA/ATS and Chinese guidelines do not recommend fluoroquinolone was the most commonly used initial antibiotic
a specific time window for delivery of the first antibiotic dose. Our regimen, and levofloxacin was the most commonly used initial
study, which demonstrated no association between antibiotic antibiotic. The finding that patients receiving regimens adherent to
timing and patient outcomes, provides support for this recom- the Chinese guidelines had a lower treatment failure rate in non-
mendation in Chinese patients. ICU patients, lower mortality and shorter LOS supports the need
Monotherapy with a fluoroquinolone was the most commonly to disseminate the 2016 Chinese guidelines. Atypical pathogen
used initial regimen overall, and monotherapy with a carbapenem active regimens were associated with lower treatment failure rate
was the most commonly used regimen in ICU CAP patients in our and shorter LOS, so future guidelines may emphasize the impor-
study (Table 2). Imipenem/cilastatin was the most commonly used tance of atypical pathogen active regimens. Further prospective
carbapenem (Table 3). Several epidemiologic surveys of CAP con- research is needed to study other aspects of antibiotic usage for CAP
ducted in Chinese adults have shown that Pseudomonas aeruginosa in China.
is infrequently isolated [22e24]. On the basis of these surveys, the
2016 Chinese CAP guidelines recommended ertapenem, as a rela- Transparency declaration
tively narrow-spectrum carbapenem, be used in empiric therapy
for some ICU patients [4]. Frequent empiric use of wide-spectrum This work was supported by the National Natural Science
carbapenems such as imipenem/cilastatin in CAP is problematic, Foundation of China (81370135) and the National Key Research and
as such a practice likely increases the prevalence of antibiotic- Development Plan of China (2017YFC1309704). All authors report
resistant bacteria [25]. no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.
Our study has some limitations. Like all observational studies,
our results might be subject to unmeasured biases. Furthermore, a
Appendix 1
change of initial antibiotic therapy more than 72 hours after the
start of antibiotics was one of our definitions of treatment failure.
Description of database
By this definition, we include de-escalation to a narrower-spectrum
intravenous antibiotic, thereby potentially overestimating the
This database includes all of the hospitals belonging to the
treatment failure rate. On the basis of our knowledge of clinical
Chinese People's Liberation Army, and all of these hospitals are
practice in China, we believe that this is uncommon. To investigate
open to the public. All the data from these hospitals were collected
this, we further looked at LOS and mortality of patients with
by the database automatically. There are 192 hospitals included.
changes in antibiotics, and found that both were worse than in
These hospitals are from grade 1 to 3 by Chinese grading system
patients without changes. Results are shown in Supplementary
(grade 1 hospitals are community hospitals, and grade 3 hospitals
Appendix 3. Also, we did a repeat analysis in which we redefined
are large general hospitals), and all of them agreed to share their
treatment failure as transfer of patient to the ICU or death more
data. The purpose of this database is to monitor the appropriate-
than 72 hours after the first antibiotic dose, and we found similar
ness of drug use, including antibiotics. The database is not open to
results with respect to relationship with atypical pathogen
the public yet.
coverage and guideline adherence (Supplementary Appendix 3).
On the basis of these findings, we believe changes in antibiotics
were mainly related to treatment failure. Appendix 2
Our study only included parenteral antibiotics. To our knowl-
edge, most patients in China receive only parenteral antibiotics
Appendix Table 1
The three most common initial empiric antibiotic regimens for CAP in different regions of China (following digitals are the percentages of each regimen, and numerators and
denominators are in the brackets)
Regions 1 2 3
nd
Northeast 2 -generation Cephalosporin Fluoroquinolone 20.1% (668/3329) Cephalosporin/beta-lactamase inhibitor
22.5% (749/3329) 12.7% (422/3329)
North China region Fluoroquinolone 16.0% (741/4627) Cephalosporin/beta-lactamase inhibitor 2nd-generation Cephalosporin 6.1% (282/4627)
6.2% (286/4627)
nd
East China region 2 -generation Cephalosporin Fluoroquinolone 8.1% (360/4425) 3rd-generation Cephalosporin 5.7% (252/4425)
8.7% (384/4425)
Central and South Fluoroquinolone 10.4% (249/2385) 3rd-generation Cephalosporin 10.4% (249/2385) 2nd-generation Cephalosporin 7.1% (169/2385)
China region
Northwest region Fluoroquinolone 15.3% (325/2131) 3rd-generation Cephalosporin 14.9% (317/2131) 2nd-generation Cephalosporin 12.9% (275/2131)
Southwest region Fluoroquinolone 28.6% (328/1146) Penicillin/beta-lactamase inhibitor 9.0% (103/1146) 3rd-generation Cephalosporin 5.1% (59/1146)
Please cite this article in press as: Nie XM, et al., Initial empiric antibiotic therapy for community-acquired pneumonia in Chinese hospitals,
Clinical Microbiology and Infection (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2017.09.014
6 X.M. Nie et al. / Clinical Microbiology and Infection xxx (2017) 1e6
Appendix Table 2
The three most common initial empiric antibiotic drugs for CAP in different regions of China (following digitals are the percentages of each drug, and numerators and de-
nominators are in the brackets)
Regions 1 2 3
Northeast Moxifloxacin 15.2% (681/4476) Cefminox 9.7% (435/4476) Cefoperazone-tazobactam 9.7% (432/4476)
North China region Moxifloxacin 16.3% (1298/7965) Levofloxacin 12.1% (961/7965) Piperacillin-tazobactam 8.5% (681/7965)
East China region Levofloxacin 21.7% (1779/8215) Penicillin 7.9% (650/8215) Moxifloxacin 7.0% (578/8215)
Central and South China region Levofloxacin 20.0% (793/3965) Cephazolin 7.3% (289/3965) Cefmenoxime 6.9% (275/3965)
Northwest region Levofloxacin 15.8% (465/2941) Moxifloxacin 7.4% (217/2941) Piperacillin- sulbactam 7.2% (211/2941)
Southwest region Moxifloxacin 21.2% (364/1716) Levofloxacin 10.8% (186/1716) Azithromycin 7.5% (129/1716)
Appendix 3 [7] Arancibia F, Ewig S, Martinez JA, Ruiz M, Bauer T, Marcos MA, et al. Antimi-
crobial treatment failures in patients with community-acquired pneumonia:
causes and prognostic implications. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;162:
Appendix Table 3 154e60.
Hospital length of stay in patients with and without a change in antibiotics after 72 [8] Mene ndez R, Torres A, Zalacaín R, Aspa J, Martín Villasclaras JJ, Borderías L,
hours et al. Risk factors of treatment failure in community acquired pneumonia:
implications for disease outcome. Thorax 2004;59:960e5.
Median interquartile P [9] Genne D, Sommer R, Kaiser L, Saaïdia A, Pasche A, Unger PF, et al. Analysis of
(days) range (days) factors that contribute to treatment failure in patients with community-
acquired pneumonia. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2006;25:159e66.
With changs in antibiotics 16 12, 24 <0.0001 [10] Hoogewerf M, Oosterheert JJ, Hak E, Hoepelman IM, Bonten MJ. Prognostic
Without change in antibiotics 10 8, 13 factors for early clinical failure in patients with severe community-acquired
pneumonia. Clin Microbiol Infect 2006;12:1097e104.
[11] Roson B, Carratala
J, Fernandez-Sabe N, Tubau F, Manresa F, Gudiol F. Causes
and factors associated with early failure in hospitalized patients with
community-acquired pneumonia. Arch Intern Med 2004;164:502e8.
Appendix Table 4 [12] Bruns AH, Oosterheert JJ, Hustinx WN, Gaillard CA, Hak E, Hoepelman AI. Time
Mortality in patients with and without a change in antibiotics after 72 hours for first antibiotic dose is not predictive for the early clinical failure of
moderate-severe community-acquired pneumonia. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect
Mortality P
Dis 2009;28:913e9.
With change in antibiotics 6.4% (248/3845) <0.0001 [13] Aliberti S, Amir A, Peyrani P, Mirsaeidi M, Allen M, Moffett BK, et al. Incidence,
Without changes in antibiotics 0.93% (132/14198) etiology, timing, and risk factors for clinical failure in hospitalized patients
with community-acquired pneumonia. Chest 2008;134:955e62.
[14] Zhou QT, He B, Zhu H. Potential for cost-savings in the care of hospitalized
low-risk community-acquired pneumonia patients in China. Value Health
2009;12:40e6.
[15] Mills GD, Oehley MR, Arrol B. Effectiveness of beta lactam antibiotics
Appendix Table 5
compared with antibiotics active against atypical pathogens in non-severe
Percentage of patients with treatment failure, redefining treatment failure to include
community acquired pneumonia: meta-analysis. BMJ 2005;330:456.
only patients who died or were transferred to ICU after 72 hours and univariate
[16] Meehan TP, Fine MJ, Krumholz HM, Scinto JD, Galusha DH, Mockalis JT, et al.
analysis of associated factors Quality of care, process, and outcomes in elderly patients with pneumonia.
JAMA 1997;278:2080e4.
Antibiotics active against atypical pathogens 0.0004
[17] Houck PM, Bratzler DW, Nsa W, Ma A, Bartlett JG. Timing of antibiotic
No 3.7% (534/14383)
administration and outcomes for Medicare patients hospitalized with
Yes 2.5% (92/3660)
community-acquired pneumonia. Arch Intern Med 2004;164:637e44.
Chinese guideline adherence in Non-ICU patients 0.0128 [18] Benenson R, Magalski A, Cavanaugh S, Williams E. Effects of a pneumonia
Not adherent 2.7% (197/7381) clinical pathway on time to antibiotic treatment, length of stay, and mortality.
Adherent 2.1% (174/8414) Acad Emerg Med 1999;6:1243e8.
Chinese guideline adherence in ICU patients 0.1009 [19] Marrie TJ, Wu L. Factors influencing in-hospital mortality in community-
Not adherent 12.0% (200/1668) acquired pneumonia: a prospective study of patients not initially admitted
Adherent 9.5% (55/580) to the ICU. Chest 2005;127:1260e70.
[20] Silber SH, Garrett C, Singh R, Sweeney A, Rosenberg C, Parachiv D, et al. Early
administration of antibiotics does not shorten time to clinical stability in
References patients with moderate-to-severe community-acquired pneumonia. Chest
2003;124:1798e804.
[1] Lim WS, Baudouin SV, George RC, Hill AT, Jamieson C, Le Jeune I, et al. BTS [21] Wachter RM, Flanders SA, Fee C, Pronovost PJ. Public reporting of antibiotic
guidelines for the management of community acquired pneumonia in adults: timing in patients with pneumonia: lessons from a flawed performance
update, 2009. Thorax 2009;64(Suppl. 3):iii1e55. measure. Ann Intern Med 2008;149:29e32.
[2] Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A, Bartlett JG, Campbell GD, Dean NC, [22] Tao LL, Hu BJ, He LX, Wei L, Xie HM, Wang BQ, et al. Etiology and antimicrobial
et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society resistance of community-acquired pneumonia in adult patients in China. Chin
consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia Med J (Engl) 2012;125:2967e72.
in adults. Clin Infect Dis 2007;44(Suppl. 2):S27e72. [23] Bao Z, Yuan X, Wang L, Sun Y, Dong X. The incidence and etiology of
[3] Diagnosis and treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. Chin J Tuberc community-acquired pneumonia in fever outpatients. Exp Biol Med (May-
Respir Dis 2006;29:651e5. wood) 2012;237:1256e61.
[4] Cao B, Huang Y, She DY, Cheng QJ, Fan H, Tian XL, et al. Diagnosis and treat- [24] Liu YN, Chen MJ, Zhao TM, Wang H, Wang R, Liu QF, et al. A multicentre study
ment of community-acquired pneumonia in adults: 2016 clinical practice on the pathogenic agents in 665 adult patients with community-acquired
guidelines by the Chinese Thoracic Society, Chinese Medical Association. Chin pneumonia in cities of China. Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi 2006;29:3e8.
J Tuberc Respir Dis 2016;39:253e9. Available in English at: Clin Respir J. In [25] Bassetti M, Righi E. Multidrug-resistant bacteria: what is the threat? Hematol
press. Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2013;2013:428e32.
[5] File TM, Marrie TJ. Burden of community-acquired pneumonia in North [26] Guidelines for the management of adults with hospital-acquired, ventilator-
American adults. Postgrad Med 2010;122:130e41. associated, and healthcare-associated pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med
[6] Oster G, Berger A, Edelsberg J, Weber DJ. Initial treatment failure in non-ICU 2005;171:388e416.
community-acquired pneumonia: risk factors and association with length of
stay, total hospital charges, and mortality. J Med Econ 2013;16:809e19.
Please cite this article in press as: Nie XM, et al., Initial empiric antibiotic therapy for community-acquired pneumonia in Chinese hospitals,
Clinical Microbiology and Infection (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2017.09.014