Initial Coin Offerings Report PWC Crypto Valley June 2018
Initial Coin Offerings Report PWC Crypto Valley June 2018
Initial Coin Offerings Report PWC Crypto Valley June 2018
A strategic perspective
As predicted in our Q4 2017 report, the phenomenon of Initial ICO regulation continues to emerge around the globe: many
Coin Offerings (ICOs) has seen a small dip since Dec 2017, but jurisdictions have issued their respective guidelines and crypto-
is rapidly gaining traction again: regulation. By now, three models are emerging:
• In the first 5 months of 2018, a total of 537 ICO’s with a • the US (securities-driven)
volume of USD 13.7 bn have been closed successfully
– which is more than all pre-2018 ICOs combined • Europe (balanced)
• Since November 2017 several large scale ICOs have • Asia (binary)
entered the Top 15, dwarfing previous records from 2017
– with Telegram (USD 1.7 bn) and EOS (USD 4.1 bn), the Strategically, ICOs continue to crowd out traditional VC
first true ICO Unicorns have appeared funding, especially in technology and Blockchain-related
startups. Hybrid models (combining classic VC/PE funding
The US, Switzerland and Singapore remain key global ICO and ICO) are increasingly establishing themselves as a valid
hubs, however, over the past months, the UK and HK gained funding alternative
significant ground
Feb-16
Mar-16
Apr-16
May-16
Jun-16
Jul-16
Aug-16
Sep-16
Oct-16
Nov-16
Dec-16
Jan-17
Feb-17
Mar-17
Apr-17
May-17
Jun-17
Jul-17
Aug-17
Sep-17
Oct-17
Nov-17
Dec-17
Jan-18
Feb-18
Mar-18
Apr-18
May-18
Jun-18
1) Calculations based on currency exchange rates on end date of ICO. As Ether and Bitcoin exchange rates are highly volatile, actual and current market capitalization of the
companies today may differ significantly from figures shown in the table. ICO funding amount until 29.05.2018 considered.
Source: PwC Strategy& analysis
1) Calculations based on currency exchange rates on end date of ICO. As Ether and Bitcoin exchange rates are highly volatile, actual and current market capitalization of the
companies today may differ significantly from figures shown in the table. ICO funding amount until 29.05.2018 considered.
Petro, the acclaimed USD 5bn ICO by the Maduro government of Venezuela was not considered, as the political opposition claims that the funds did not reach Venezuela
2) EOS conducted a two-phased ICO. In the 1st phase (5 days in June 2017), USD 185 mn were raised. The second phase lasted 350 days, ending in June 2018.
Source: PwC Strategy& analysis
1′158
• Around a third of all announced ICO projects close successfully • The majority of top funded ICO projects are on track and the
product is further being developed – only few have no product yet
• Many projects are delayed and loose momentum during ICO
preparation processes – reasons can reach from legal struggles to • Some companies that launched ICOs struggle with major
problems within the ICO project team difficulties such as legal or governance issues
• ICOs for which no funding amount is available are believed to be • ICO projects with smaller scale funding then the top 20 have a
cancelled – however, it can’t be excluded that those project higher tendency to get off track or even dissolve – reasons can be
continued away from public attention manifold (e.g. legal, team, technical, product, etc.)
Overall positive attitude, but market Overall positive attitude Overall positive attitude
still awaits more clarity on towards cryptocurrencies towards cryptocurrencies
protectionary regulations
All tokens treated as securities Tokens treated as assets Tokens treated as assets
as per current communications
Not exhaustive
Gibraltar
Tokens classified as
commercial products
Sponsor regime: individual
to supervise token sale Malta
Government implementing
Blockchain law
Companies from oversea
moving to ‘Blockchain island’
Favorable regulation
Wary/existing regulation For more details please see:
Relative funding amount per round Relative funding amount per round Relative funding amount per round
Funding Receive initial funding after business plan, Receive initial funding after business plan, Receive funding based on whitepaper,
rationale prototype and team validation prototype and team validation – ICO funding founder team and idea – additional ‘ICO’
to grow business further & raise more funds only if necessary (rare)
Pros & + Investors cautiously validate ideas before + Founders get “smart money” as well as + Founders get crowd support
cons committing funds crowd support (first customers) + Founders are free to innovate
+ Founders cautious with spending money + VCs validate seriousness of business, ‒ Governance risks if no framework
‒ Founders often focused on next funding crowd validates idea & market potential ‒ Transparency risks on use of proceeds
round (hinders innovation) + Founders are free to innovate and product development
‒ Potential conflicts between shareholders
and token holders
Initial
Investors
Business Venture Business Venture Tech- BC/ crypto- Tech- BC/ crypto-
Angels capitalists Angels capitalists savvy community savvy community
• Structured fundraising rounds with caps of funding increase • Interactive protocol to solve certainty of participation and
transparency and need-based funding of projects certainty of valuation problem by specifying desired purchase
quantity at each valuation via smart contract techniques
• Combination with VC funding to diversify funding sources and
validate project with professional investors (e.g. offering pre- • Lock-up period for tokens requires investors to weigh
sales to VCs) benefits/ risks of investment decision more carefully
• “Less promotion is better promotion”: avoidance of over- • Transparent communication while and after ICO (e.g. what
promoting ICO aggressively as it dilutes credibility of project; happens with tokens and potential legal issues)
more focus on pre-sale phase with targeted investors
• Careful evaluation and selection of jurisdiction, where company/ • Staggered release of funds to development team including voting
foundation to issue tokens should be set up mechanisms ensures appropriate use of funds and increases
accountability for efficient allocation of resources
• Stronger focus on governance and legal entity set-up
• More focus on cybersecurity pre- and post-ICO
• Pre-registering requirement for investors combined with KYC/
AML investor identification limits max. purchase by investor • Increasingly, traditional businesses and start-ups are looking at
solving distribution problem (e.g. Sybil attacks) without need for ICOs (as a pure form of crowdfunding/-lending)
uncapped ICO
• More focus on building communities of interest & thriving
ecosystems vs. pure tech development
Strategy Project Management Issuing Entity Tax Personal Tax Accounting Advisory