EP1828105B1
EP1828105B1
EP1828105B1
(19)
Note: Within nine months of the publication of the mention of the grant of the European patent in the European Patent
Bulletin, any person may give notice to the European Patent Office of opposition to that patent, in accordance with the
Implementing Regulations. Notice of opposition shall not be deemed to have been filed until the opposition fee has been
paid. (Art. 99(1) European Patent Convention).
Description
[0001] The present invention relates to an efficient process for the preparation of optically active R-(-)-N, α -Dimeth-
ylphenethylamine (Levmetamfetamine) or S-(+)- N, α - Dimethylphenethylamine (Methamphetamine) free of its optical
5 antipode from d-ephedrine or I-ephedrine respectively.
[0002] The invention relates to a novel process for the synthesis of levmetamfetamine or methamphetamine from d-
10 ephedrine or I-ephedrine. Levmetamfetamine and methamphetamine are the intermediates for the production of Sele-
giline hydrochloride and Benzaphetamine hydrochloride.
[0003] Many methods are known in the literature for making these molecules. The various methods of synthesis of
these compounds are categorized broadly in the following types:
15 - Chiral synthesis
- Racemic synthesis and separation by resolution
- From appropriate ephedrines via chlorination and catalytic hydrogenation
- From appropriate ephedrines via catalytic hydrogenation
- From appropriate ephedrine hydrochlorides via O-acylation and catalytic hydrogenation
20
1) a.) Chiral synthesis of 1-alkyl- 2-phenyl ethylamines via grignard reaction of 4-phenyl-1,3-oxazolidines and
subsequent hydrogenolysis yields levmetamfetamine (Tahkasahi Hiroshi et. al., Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1985,33
(11), 4662-70).
25 b) Other chiral synthesis is from chiral Oxazolidines (Henri Phillipe Husson et. al., Synthetic communications,
1987, 17(6), 669-676). Thus, successive dialkylation of 1,3-Oxazolidines afforded substituted N-cyano
methyl-1,3-Oxazolidine which was decyanated using NaBH4 in ethanol at room temperature and the chiral
appendage of this product was removed by hydrogenolysis giving methamphetamine in 56-62% yield. This
method though useful to prepare optically pure methamphetamine, is expensive and labor intensive.
30
2) In the synthesis of racemic methyl amphetamine, various methods were described in the prior art. Some of
them are:
b) The commercial use of the Wallach- Leucart reaction was explored in the synthesis of methyl amphet-
amines from phenyl acetone and ammonium formate and hydrolysis of the intermediate yielded ampheta-
mines. This was treated with formic acetic anhydride to form ()- N- formyl amphetamine which was reduced
40 by LAH to get racemic methyl amphetamine in 67 % yield (Cervinka, Otakar et. al., Collect. Czech. Chem.
Comm1968, 33 (11) 3551-7).
c) In the illegal synthesis of methyl amphetamines (Masano Isutsumi et.al., Science and Crime detection
(Japan), 1953, 6,50-2), phenyl acetic acid was treated with Pb (OAc)2 to get phenyl acetone . This was
45 reacted with MeNH2 and reduced to get racemic methyl amphetamine.
d) Racemic methyl amphetamine was prepared from acetaldehyde (Adolph C. J. Opfermann et.al.,Brit.
782,887) via grignard reaction with benzyl magnesium chloride in ether and the intermediate was treated
with methyl amine.
50
The racemic methyl amphetamine obtained via any of these processes is then resolved to get levmetamfetamine
and methamphetamine via resolution with optically active carboxylic acids through a lengthy and labour intensive
process with less over all yields.
55 Hence it is desirable to have the simple and economically viable process to get an optically pure form of these
methyl amphetamines.
3) In another procedure, heating the appropriate hydrochloride salts of ephedrine with thionyl chloride at reflux
2
EP 1 828 105 B1
temperature to get the appropriate 1-phenyl-1-chloro-2 methylamino propane hydrochloride, followed by catalytic
hydrogenation gave appropriate enantiomers of methyl amphetamines (Hajicek Josef et.al., Czech. CS 272,434).
Though the reaction gives appropriate methyl amphetamines, the reaction scheme is undesirable because of
the usage of hazardous and eco un-friendly thionyl chloride and expensive palladium based hydrogenating
5 catalysts.
4. a) In another procedure, appropriate hydrochloride salts of Ephedrine were converted directly to appropriate
methyl amphetamines by hydrogenating in glacial acetic acid using sulphuric acid and Pd wool (Karl Kindler et.
al., Ann., 1948, 560,215-21).
10
b) In another procedure, appropriate hydrochloride salts of Ephedrine were converted directly to appropriate
methyl amphetamines by hydrogenating in glacial acetic acid using hydrochloric acid and Pd at 90°C (Knoll
et.al., Ger. 968,545).
15 c) In another procedure, 1-ephedrine was reacted with Phosphorous oxychloride to give 1-2 -Chloro-3,4-
dimethyl -5-phenyl-1,3,2-oxaazaphospholidine-2-oxide . Hydrolysis of this yielded 1-ephedrine Phosphate,
which was catalytically hydrogenated to form the methamphetamine (A.Larizza et. al., J. Med. Chem.,1966,
9, 966 -67).
20 d) One of the illegal manufactures of methyl amphetamines is from appropriate ephedrines via reduction
with hydroiodic acid and red phosphorous (Skinner, Harry F et. al., Forensic Sci. Int. 1990, 48 (2),123-34).
This method has disadvantages which includes hydroiodic acid is toxic and strong irritant and contact must
be minimised. Red phosphorous is a flammable and explosive solid and must be handled with care. So
another route was desirable which could overcome these problems.
25
5) Recent process (Robert Fredrick Rosewell et. al , US 6,399,828) for the preparation of Methyl amphetamine
involves O-acylation of the appropriate hydrochloride salts of ephedrine to hydrochloride salts of O-Acetyl
ephedrine and subsequent hydrogenolysis provides methyl amphetamines. Thus methamphetamine was ob-
tained from either 1R, 2S-(-) ephedrine or 1S,2S-(+)-pseudoephedrine via O-acylation and hydrogenolysis
30 process. Though this process produces required methyl amphetamines, it is an expensive process because of
the cost of the hydrogenating catalyst, which is Palladium on carbon (Pd/C).
[0004] Thus, there was a long felt need for a process which is eco-friendly, cost effective and less labor intensive. The
process of the present invention was investigated on these lines and found to be good in all respects. Using the present
35 invention levmetamfetamine and methamphetamine were prepared in high overall yields from d-ephedrine and 1-ephe-
drine respectively in an efficient, cost effective and industrially safe manner as will be evident from the accompanying
detailed description.
3
EP 1 828 105 B1
[0010] The present invention relates to a process for asymmetric synthesis of R-(-)-N, α - Dimethylphenethylamine
(Levmetamfetamine) of formula I
5
10
15
from d-ephedrine precursor or S-(+)-N, α - Dimethylphenethylamine (Methamphetamine) enantiomer of formula II,
20
25
30 from 1-ephedrine precursor, which are free from their optical antipode comprising:
35
40
45 or Formula IV
50
55
with an acylating agent to make a reaction mixture containing a N- acylated ephedrine of formula V
4
EP 1 828 105 B1
10
or Formula VI,
15
20
25
30 b) deoxygenation of N-acylated ephedrines ( formula V or VI) to make the compound of the formula VII
35
40
45
or Formula VIII
50
55
5
EP 1 828 105 B1
10
Detailed description:
[0011] After considerable investigation of the prior art and various modifications thereof, it was concluded that a new
20 approach was required for development of cost effective process for the preparation of R-(-)-N, α -Dimethylphenethyl-
amine (Levmetamfetamine) or S-(+)-N, a - Dimethylphenethylamine (Methamphetamine). Further, the literature proce-
dures for making amphetamines and methamphetamines report the retention of configuration at the carbon bearing
amino group (.Noggle, Deruiter, and Clarke, J. Chrom. Sci., 1987, 25, 38-42); Allen and Kiser, J. Forensic Sciences.,
1987 , 32,(4) ,953-962). Therefore d,1 ephedrine is expected to give d,1-methyl amphetamines , d-ephedrine is expected
25 to give levmetamfetamine and 1-ephedrine is expected to give methamphetamine respectively. Thus, the obvious choice
of starting materials were d-ephedrine or 1-ephedrine since they have the right stereochemistry at C-2 carbon atom of
the molecule. These compounds are further advantageous in that they are easily available commercially.
[0012] The process of the present invention comprises (a) amide formation and (b) removal of the benzylic hydroxyl
group by refluxing with Raney Nickel catalyst and (c) subsequent hydrolysis of the amide group. When this process is
30 applied to the production of levmetamfetamine and methamphetamine, the process has several advantages over current
production methods, which are:
55
6
EP 1 828 105 B1
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
[0016] In step A, the starting material d-ephedrine of formula III or 1-ephedrine of formula IV are converted into their
7
EP 1 828 105 B1
corresponding amides of formula V or formula VI, wherein R may be hydrogen, methyl or phenyl group using an appro-
priate reagent. When R is hydrogen, the appropriate reagent is ethyl formate. When R is methyl group, the appropriate
reagent is acetic anhydride and when R is phenyl group, the appropriate reagent is benzoyl chloride. In the most preferred
embodiment of the invention, R corresponds to hydrogen atom wherein the appropriate reagent used is ethyl formate.
5 [0017] In step B, the corresponding amides of formula V or formula VI are deoxygenated using Raney Nickel as reagent
in refluxing toluene to obtain the corresponding deoxygenated amides of formula VII or VIII wherein R may be as defined
above.
[0018] In step C, the deoxygenated amides of formula VII or VIII are hydrolysed by refluxing in 1:1 aq. HCl to the
corresponding title compounds of the formula I (Levmetamphetamine) or formula II (Methamphetamine) in surprisingly
10 good yields.
[0019] The present invention thus provides an efficient process for stereoselective preparation of optically active
R-(-)-N, α -Dimethylphenethylamine (Levmetamfetamine) or S-(+)-N, α Dimethylphenethylamine (Methamphetamine)
from d-ephedrine or 1-ephedrine respectively, free from its optical antipode.
[0020] An important feature of the present invention is the deoxygenation of N-acyl ephedrine by means of an easily
15 accessible and inexpensive Raney Nickel catalyst. The first step (step A) in the reaction scheme is amide formation of
ephedrine. N-Formyl ephedrines of Formula V(a) or VI(a)( when R is hydrogen) were prepared by known process from
appropriate ephedrine and ethyl formate (Dieter Enders et. al., Liebigs Ann / Recueil, 1997, 1101-1113).
20
25
30
[0021] However these compounds can be prepared by methyl formate also. The temperature of reaction is between
50°C and 60°C, preferably between 55°C and 60°C. The reaction is carried out by mixing appropriate ephedrine and
ethyl formate and carefully heating the reaction mixture to 55°C-60°C and the product was isolated by distilling off the
35 excess reagent and ethanol.
[0022] N-Acetyl ephedrines [Formula V (b) and Formula VI (b)] is prepared from appropriate ephedrine and acetic
anhydride in chloroform.
40
45
50
[0023] N-Benzoyl ephedrines [Formula V (c) and Formula VI (c)] is prepared from appropriate ephedrine and benzoyl
chloride in an organic solvent using aq. sodium hydroxide at 20°C temperature.
55
8
EP 1 828 105 B1
10
15 [0024] The organic solvent for this purpose may be any suitable solvent known to a person skilled in the art. The
solvent may be preferably selected from dichloromethane or chloroform.
[0025] The second step (step B), which is a key reaction in the reaction scheme is benzylic secondary alcohol deox-
ygenation of the above ephedrine amides. The reaction is carried out by mixing appropriate ephedrine amides (N-formyl,
N-acetyl, or N-benzoyl) and Raney Nickel catalyst in a suitable organic solvent and slowly heating the reaction mixture
20 to reflux temperature to obtain compounds of Formula VII(a), VII(b) or VII(c) or VIII(a), VIII(b) or VIII(c).
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
9
EP 1 828 105 B1
[0026] The organic solvent for this reaction may preferably be selected from toluene or benzene. Most preferably the
solvent is toluene. The ratio of the ephedrine amide and Raney Nickel catalyst is crucial for this reaction. The ratio of
ephedrine amide and Raney Nickel catalyst could be any thing between one gram to six ml. (settled catalyst in water)
and one gram to two ml. Preferably the ratio is one gram to two ml. There is no appreciable deoxygenation of ephedrine
5 amides below this range.
[0027] The temperature of reaction mixture for the deoxygenation is maintained between 70°C and 85° C. The optimum
temperature is in between 80°C and 85°C. The product is recovered by filtering the catalyst and solvent evaporation.
This crude product is reasonably pure enough to carry out hydrolysis without further purification and it contains mainly
deoxygenated ephedrine amide. For all practical purpose N- acyl-ephedrine compounds were deoxygenated in high
10 yield and these examples are described in the following section.
[0028] The third step (step C) in the scheme is hydrolysis of desoxy ephedrine amides. This step was carried out by
mixing the appropriate desoxy ephedrine amide and 1:1 aq. HCl in the ratio of 1 gm to 5 ml. and then heating to reflux
temperatures. The optimum temperature for this reaction is in between 103°C and 108°C
[0029] The reaction mixture is extracted with a non-polar organic solvent (preferably toluene) to remove non basic
15 impurities and the the aqueous layer was basified with aqueous sodium hydroxide. The product was taken into solvent
and isolated the product by solvent removal. The solvent used for this extraction may preferably selected from a group
comprising of benzene, toluene, methylene dichloride, diethyl ether and diisopropyl ether or mixtures thereof
[0030] The details of the invention, its objects and advantages are explained hereunder in greater detail in relation to
non-limiting exemplary illustrations. The examples are merely illustrative and do not limit the teaching of this invention
20 and it would be obvious that various modifications or changes in the procedural steps by those skilled in the art without
departing from the scope of the invention and shall be consequently encompassed with in the ambit and spirit of this
approach and scope thereof.
[0031] In the following experiments the analytical instruments used for qualitative analysis includes Gas liquid chro-
matography, Infrared spectrometer and Polarimeter and thin layer chromatography. d- and 1-Ephedrine bases are
25 commercially available and were used to illustrate in the reactions useful in the process.
Step B: Preparation of N-Formyl desoxy ephedrine (VIIa) from N-Formyl Ephedrine (Va)
[0033] In a three necked 2 Lit. round bottom flask equipped with thermo controller, stirrer and condenser was charged
40 with Raney Nickel catalyst (slurry weight 345 geams; slurry volume 190 ml.) and 100 grams (0.51 mole) of N-Formyl
ephedrine and distlled toluene (0.8 lit.). The reaction mixture was heated on a water bath to reflux under stirring for
fifteen hours. Cooled the reaction mixture to 60°C and filtered the catalyst and washed the catalyst with toluene (500
ml) twice. The combined toluene layers were washed with water and dried over sodium sulphate and concentrated under
vacuum which afforded N formyl desoxyephedrine as a pale yellow to white clear viscous liquid toluene (73 grams, 80%
45 yield).
[0034] In a three necked 500 ml. round bottom flask equipped with thermo controller, stirrer and condenser was
50 charged with N-formyl desoxy ephedrine (50 grams, 0.28 mole) and 1:1 aq. HCl (250 ml). The reaction mixture was
refluxed (reaction temperature 104 - 105°C) while stirring for 10 hours. Cooled the reaction mass to 40°C and extracted
with toluene to remove neutral impurities. Aqueous layer was basified with aq. Sodium hydroxide and extracted with
diisopropyl ether (2 X 250 ml). The organic layers were washed with water and dried over sodium sulphate. Solvent was
removed by distillation under vacuum, which afforded levmetamfetamine as a pale yellow to white clear liquid. (38 grams,
55 90 % yield), Specific optical rotation.: -17.4° (2% solution in 1.2N HCl); purity: (GLC: 98.5%)
10
EP 1 828 105 B1
5 [0035] In a three-necked 500 ml round bottom flask equipped with thermo controller, stirrer and condenser was charged
with 200 grams (1.2 mole) of 1-ephedrine and ethyl formate 160 grams (2.16 mole). The reaction mixture was warmed
with a water bath to 55-60°C under stirring and maintained at this temperature for eight hours. Distilled off the excess
reagent and formed ethanol. N-Formyl derivative was obtained as pale yellow to white viscous liquid (220 grams), Specific
optical rotation: +22.90° (2% solution in methanol), purity: (GLC): 99.90%
10
Step B : Preparation of N-Formyl desoxy ephedrine (VIIIa) from N-Formyl Ephedrine (VIa)
[0036] In a three necked 1lit. round bottom flask equipped with thermo controller, stirrer and condenser was charged
with Raney Nickel catalyst (slurry weight 180 grams; slurry volume 98 ml.) and 50 grams (0.26mole) of N-Formyl ephedrine
15 and distilled toluene (0.2 lit.). The reaction mixture was heated on a water bath to reflux (reaction temperature 84°C)
under stirring for fifteen hours. Cooled the reaction mixture to 60°C and filtered the catalyst and washed the catalyst
with toluene (200 ml) twice. The combined toluene layers were washed with water and dried over sodium sulphate and
concentrated under vacuum which afforded N-formyl desoxyephedrine as a pale yellow to white clear viscous liquid (36
grams, 80% yield).
20
Step C: Preparation of methamphetamine (II) from N-Formyl desoxy ephedrine (VIIIa)
[0037] In a three necked 500 ml. round bottom flask equipped with thermo controller, stirrer and condenser was
charged with N-formyl desoxy ephedrine (35 grams, 0.197 mole) and 1:1 aq. HCl (175 ml). The reaction mixture was
25 refluxed (reaction temperature 104-105°C) while stirring for 10 hours. Cooled the reaction mass to 40°C and extracted
with toluene to remove neutral impurities. Aqueous layer was basified with aq. Sodium hydroxide and extracted with
diisopropyl ether (2 X 100 ml). The organic layers were washed with water and dried over sodium sulphate. Solvent was
removed by distillation under vacuum, which afforded methamphetamine as a pale yellow to white clear liquid. (23 grams,
78 % yield), Specific optical rotation.: + 17.3° (2% solution in 1.2N HCl) ; purity: (GLC): 98.2%].
30
Example 3: Preparation of levmetamfetamine:
35 [0038] In a three-necked 1000 ml round bottom flask equipped with thermo controller, stirrer and condenser was
charged with 100 grams (0.606 mole) of d-ephedrine and acetic anhydride 185.5 grams (1.818 mole). The reaction
mixture was warmed with a water bath to 65-70°C under stirring and maintained at this temperature for two hours. Added
250 ml water. Extracted the N-acetyl derivative with toluene(3x150 ml). The combined organic layer was concentrated
to get N-acetyl derivative (113 grams,MP:85-88°C).
40
Step B: Preparation of N-Acetyl desoxy ephedrine (VIIb) from N-Acetyl Ephedrine (Vb)
[0039] In a three necked 2 Lit. round bottom flask equipped with thermo controller, stirrer and condenser was charged
with Raney Nickel catalyst (slurry weight 345 grams; slurry volume 190 ml.) and 100 grams (0.483 mole) of N-acetyl
45 ephedrine in distlled toluene (0.8 lit.). The reaction mixture was heated on a water bath to reflux under stirring for fifteen
hours. Cooled the reaction mixture to 60°C and filtered the catalyst and washed the catalyst with toluene (500 ml) twice.
The combined toluene layer was washed with water and dried over sodium sulphate and concentrated under vacuum
which afforded N Acetyl desoxyephedrine as a pale yellow to white clear viscous liquid (64 grams, 69.41 % yield).
[0040] In a three necked 500 ml. round bottom flask equipped with thermo controller, stirrer and condenser was
charged with N-acetyl desoxy ephedrine (50 grams, 0.261 mole) and 1:1 aq. HCl (250 ml). The reaction mixture was
refluxed (reaction temperature 104 - 105°C) while stirring for 12 hours. Cooled the reaction mass to 40°C and extracted
55 with toluene to remove neutral impurities. Aqueous layer was basified with aq. Sodium hydroxide and extracted with
diisopropyl ether (2 X 200 ml). The organic layers were pooled and washed with water and dried over sodium sulphate.
Solvent was removed by distillation under vacuum, which afforded levmetamfetamine as a pale yellow to white clear
liquid. (35 grams, 89.7% yield), Specific optical rotation.: -17.6° (2% solution in 1.2N HCl); purity : (GLC: 98.9%)
11
EP 1 828 105 B1
5 [0041] In a three-necked 1000 ml round bottom flask equipped with thermo controller, stirrer and condenser was
charged with 100 grams (0.606 mole) of 1-ephedrine and acetic anhydride 185.5 grams (1.818 mole). The reaction
mixture was warmed with a water bath to 65-70°C under stirring and maintained at this temperature for two hours. Added
250 ml water. Extracted the N-acetyl derivative with toluene(3x150 ml). The combined organic layer was concentrated
to get N-acetyl derivative (110 grams, MP: 86-87°C)
10
Step B : Preparation of N-Acetyl desoxy ephedrine (VIIIb) from N-Acetyl Ephedrine (VIb)
[0042] In a three necked 2 Lit. round bottom flask equipped with thermo controller, stirrer and condenser was charged
with Raney Nickel catalyst (slurry weight 345 grams; slurry volume 190 ml.) and 100 grams (0.483 mole) of N-acetyl
15 ephedrine(VIb) in distlled toluene (0.8 lit.). The reaction mixture was heated on a water bath to reflux under stirring for
fifteen hours. Cooled the reaction mixture to 60°C and filtered the catalyst and washed the catalyst with toluene (500
ml) twice. The combined toluene layer was washed with water and dried over sodium sulphate and concentrated under
vacuum which afforded N Acetyl desoxyephedrine as a pale yellow to white clear viscous liquid (66 grams, 71.70% yield).
[0043] In a three necked 500 ml. round bottom flask equipped with thermo controller, stirrer and condenser was
charged with N-acetyl desoxy ephedrine (50 grams, 0.261 mole) and 1:1 aq. HCl (250 ml). The reaction mixture was
refluxed (reaction temperature 104 - 105°C) while stirring for 12 hours. Cooled the reaction mass to 40°C and extracted
25 with toluene to remove neutral impurities. Aqueous layer was basified with aq. Sodium hydroxide and extracted with
diisopropyl ether (2 X 200 ml). The organic layers were pooled and washed with water and dried over sodium sulphate.
Solvent was removed by distillation under vacuum, which afforded methamphetamine as a pale yellow to white clear
liquid. (34 grams, 87.17% yield), Specific optical rotation.: +17.8° (2% solution in 1.2N HCl); purity: (GLC: 99%)
[0044] In a three-necked 1000 ml round bottom flask equipped with thermo controller, stirrer and condenser was
35 charged with 100 grams (0.606mole) of d-ephedrine in chloroform (175 ml). Added benzoyl chloride (91.99 grams) and
20% sodium hydroxide solution ( 134 ml) simultaneously at room temperature. The reaction mass was stirred further 90
minutes at room temperature. Seperated the organic layer and aq. layer .Extracted the aq. layer with another 175 ml of
chloroform. The organic layers were pooled and washed with water and concentrated. The residue was recrystallised
in benzene/pet. ether which gave the product (128 grams, 78.45%)
40
Step B: Preparation of N-Benzoyl desoxy ephedrine (VIIc) from N-Benzoyl Ephedrine (Vc)
[0045] In a three necked 2 Lit. round bottom flask equipped with thermo controller, stirrer and condenser was charged
with Raney Nickel catalyst (slurry weight 350 grams; slurry volume 193 ml.) and 100 grams (0.37 mole) of N-benzoyl
45 ephedrine and distlled toluene (1 lit.). The reaction mixture was heated on a water bath to reflux under stirring for fourteen
hours. Cooled the reaction mixture to 60°C and filtered the catalyst and washed the catalyst with toluene (500 ml) twice.
The combined toluene layers were washed with water and dried over sodium sulphate and concentrated under vacuum
which afforded N Benzoyll desoxyephedrine as a pale yellow to white clear viscous liquid toluene (65.4 grams, 69.57%
yield).
50
Step C: Preparation of levmetamfetamine (I) from N-Benzoyl desoxy ephedrine (VIIc)
[0046] In a three necked 500 ml. round bottom flask equipped with thermo controller, stirrer and condenser was
charged with N-benzoyl desoxy ephedrine (50 grams, 0.1976 mole) and 1:1 aq. HCl (250 ml). The reaction mixture was
55 refluxed (reaction temperature 104 - 105°C) while stirring for 13 hours. Cooled the reaction mass to 60°C and extracted
with chloroform to remove neutral impurities. Aqueous layer was basified with aq. Sodium hydroxide and extracted with
diisopropyl ether (2 X 200 ml). The organic layers were pooled and washed with water and dried over sodium sulphate.
Solvent was removed by distillation under vacuum, which afforded levmetamfetamine as a pale yellow to white clear
12
EP 1 828 105 B1
liquid. (20.8 grams, 71 % yield), Specific optical rotation.: -17.2° (2% solution in 1.2N HCl); purity : (GLC: 99%)
[0047] In a three-necked 1000 ml round bottom flask equipped with thermo controller, stirrer and condenser was
charged with 100 grams (0.606mole) of 1-ephedrine in chloroform (175 ml). Added benzoyl chloride (91.99 grams) and
20% sodium hydroxide solution ( 134 ml) simultaneously at room temperature. The reaction mass was stirred further 90
10 minutes at room temperature. Seperated the organic layer and aq. layer .Extracted the aq. layer with another 175 ml of
chloroform. The organic layers were pooled and washed with water and concentrated. The residue was recrystallised
in benzene/pet. ether which gave the product (126.5 grams, 78.% yield)
Step B : Preparation of N-Benzoyl desoxy ephedrine (VIIIc) from N-Benzoyl Ephedrine (VIc)
15
[0048] In a three necked 2 Lit. round bottom flask equipped with thermo controller, stirrer and condenser was charged
with Raney Nickel catalyst (slurry weight 348 grams; slurry volume 193 ml.) and 100 grams (0.37 mole) of N-benzoyl
ephedrine and distlled toluene (1 lit.). The reaction mixture was heated on a water bath to reflux under stirring for fourteen
hours. Cooled the reaction mixture to 60°C and filtered the catalyst and washed the catalyst with toluene (500 ml) twice.
20 The combined toluene layers were washed with water and dried over sodium sulphate and concentrated under vacuum
which afforded N Benzoyl desoxyephedrine as a pale yellow to white clear viscous liquid (65.grams, 69.5% yield).
25 [0049] In a three necked 500 ml. round bottom flask equipped with thermo controller, stirrer and condenser was
charged with N-benzoyl desoxy ephedrine (50 grams, 0.1976 mole) and 1:1 aq. HCl (250 ml). The reaction mixture was
refluxed (reaction temperature 104 - 105°C) while stirring for 13 hours. Cooled the reaction mass to 60°C and extracted
with chloroform to remove neutral impurities. Aqueous layer was basified with aq. Sodium hydroxide and extracted with
diisopropyl ether (2 X 200 ml). The organic layers were pooled and washed with water and dried over sodium sulphate.
30 Solvent was removed by distillation under vacuum, which afforded methamphetamine as a pale yellow to white clear
liquid. (21.0 grams, 71 % yield), Specific optical rotation.: +17.4° (2% solution in 1.2N HCl); purity : (GLC: 98.99%)
Claims
35
1. A process for asymmetric synthesis of R-(-)-N, α -Dimethylphenethylamine (Levmetamfetamine) of formula I
40
45
55
13
EP 1 828 105 B1
10
with an acylating agent to make a reaction mixture containing a N- acylated ephedrine derivative of formula V
15
20
25
35
40
50
55
characterized in that the deoxygenation reaction in step (b) is carried out in presence of raney nickel catalyst.
14
EP 1 828 105 B1
formula II,
10
20
25
with an acylating agent to make a reaction mixture containing a N- acylated ephedrine of formula VI,
30
35
40
50
55
15
EP 1 828 105 B1
c) effecting acid hydrolysis of Formula VIII to obtain the compound of formula II,
10
15 characterized in that the deoxygenation reaction in step (b) is carried out in presence of raney nickel catalyst.
3. A process as claimed in claim 1 or 2 wherein, the acylating agent is selected from ethyl formate, methyl formate,
acetic anhydride and benzoyl chloride.
5. A process as claimed anyone of the preceding claims, wherein the solvent used for deoxygenation is selected from
toluene or benzene.
25 6. A process as claimed in claim 5, wherein the solvent used for deoxygenation is toluene.
7. A process as claimed in anyone of the preceding claims, wherein the temperature used for deoxygenation reaction
is the refluxing temperature of the solvent used.
30 8. A process as claimed in claim 7, wherein the temperature used for the deoxygenation reaction is between 70°C to
85°C.
9. A process as claimed in claim 8, wherein the temperature used for the deoxygenation reaction is between 80°C to
85°C.
35
10. A process as claimed in anyone of the preceding claims, characterized in that the ratio of N-acyl ephedrine (gm)
to Raney nickel catalyst (settled volume,ml.) for deoxygenation reaction is 1 gm of substrate per 6 ml of catalyst.
11. A process as claimed in claim 14, wherein the ratio of N-acyl ephedrine (gm) to Raney nickel catalyst (settled volume,
40 ml.) for deoxygenation reaction is 1 gm of substrate per 2 ml of catalyst.
12. A process as claimed in claim 1, 2 or 3, characterized in that the acid hydrolysis is carried out using aqueous
hydrochloric acid.
45
Patentansprüche
50
55
16
EP 1 828 105 B1
aus d-Ephedrin-Vorläufer, das von seinem optischen Antipoden frei ist, umfassend:
10
15 mit einem Acylierungsmittel zu einem Reaktionsgemisch um, das ein N-acyliertes Ephedrinderivat der Formel
V enthält,
20
25
35
40
50
55
17
EP 1 828 105 B1
10
aus 1-Ephedrinvorläufer, der von seinem optischen Antipoden frei ist, umfassend:
15
a) man setzt 1-Ephedrinbase der Formel IV
20
25
mit einem Acylierungsmittel zu einer Reaktionsmischung, die N-acyliertes Ephedrin der Formel VI enthält, um,
30
35
40
50
55
18
EP 1 828 105 B1
10
15 3. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1 oder 2, wobei das Acylierungsmittel aus Ethylformiat, Methylformiat, Essigsäureanhydrid
oder Benzoylchlorid ausgewählt ist.
20 5. Verfahren nach einem der vorstehenden Ansprüche, wobei das für die Deoxydierung verwendete Lösungsmittel
aus Toluol oder Benzol ausgewählt ist.
6. Verfahren nach Anspruch 5, wobei das für die Deoxydierung verwendete Lösungsmittel Toluol ist.
25 7. Verfahren nach einem der vorstehenden Ansprüche, wobei die für die Deoxydierungsreaktion verwendete Tempe-
ratur die Rückflusstemperatur des verwendeten Lösungsmittels ist.
8. Verfahren nach Anspruch 7, wobei die für die Deoxydierungsreaktion verwendete Temperatur zwischen 70°C und
85°C liegt.
30
9. Verfahren nach Anspruch 8, wobei die für die Deoxydierungsreaktion verwendete Temperatur zwischen 80°C und
85°C liegt.
10. Verfahren nach einem der vorstehenden Ansprüche, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass das Verhältnis von N-Acy-
35 lephedrin (g) zu Raney-Nickel-Katalysator (abgesetztes Volumen, ml) für die Deoxydierungsreaktion 1 g Substanz
auf 6 ml Katalysator ist.
11. Verfahren nach Anspruch 14, wobei das Verhältnis von N-Acylephedrin (g) zu Raney-Nickel-Katalysator (abgesetz-
tes Volumen, ml) für die Deoxydierungsreaktion 1 g Substrat pro 2 ml Katalysator ist.
40
12. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, 2 oder 3, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Hydrolyse unter Verwendung von
wässriger Salzsäure durchgeführt wird.
45 Revendications
50
55
19
EP 1 828 105 B1
10
avec un agent d’acylation pour donner un mélange réactionnel contenant un dérivé de N-éphédrine acylée de
formule V
15
20
25
où R peut être choisi parmi un atome d’hydrogène, un groupe méthyle ou un groupe phényle ;
b) la désoxygénation des N-éphédrines acylées de formule V pour donner un produit de formule VII
30
35
45
50
caractérisé en ce que la réaction de désoxygénation de l’étape (b) est réalisée en présence d’un catalyseur de
nickel de Raney.
20
EP 1 828 105 B1
15
20
avec un agent d’acylation pour donner un mélange réactionnel contenant un dérivé de N-éphédrine acylée de
25 formule VI
30
35
où R peut être choisi parmi un atome d’hydrogène, un groupe méthyle ou un groupe phényle ;
b) la désoxygénation des N-éphédrines acylées de formule VI pour donner un produit de formule VIII
40
45
50
où R peut être tel que défini ci-dessus dans l’étape (a) ;
c) la réalisation d’une hydrolyse acide du composé de formule VIII pour obtenir le composé de formule II
55
21
EP 1 828 105 B1
10
caractérisé en ce que la réaction de désoxygénation de l’étape (b) est réalisée en présence d’un catalyseur de
nickel de Raney.
3. Procédé selon la revendication 1 ou 2, dans lequel l’agent acylation est choisi parmi le formate d’éthyle, le formate
15 de méthyle, l’anhydride acétique et le chlorure de benzoyle.
4. Procédé selon la revendication 3, dans lequel l’agent d’acylation est le formate d’éthyle.
5. Procédé selon l’une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel le solvant utilisé pour la désoxygé-
20 nation est choisi parmi le toluène ou le benzène.
6. Procédé selon la revendication 5, dans lequel le solvant utilisé pour la désoxygénation est le toluène.
7. Procédé selon l’une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel la température utilisée pour la réaction
25 de désoxygénation est la température de reflux du solvant utilisé.
8. Procédé selon la revendication 7, dans lequel la température utilisée pour la réaction de désoxygénation est comprise
dans la plage allant de 70°C à 85°C.
30 9. Procédé selon la revendication 8, dans lequel la température utilisée pour la réaction de désoxygénation est comprise
dans la plage allant de 80°C à 85 °C.
10. Procédé selon l’une quelconque des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que le rapport de N-acyl-
éphédrine (g) au catalyseur de nickel de Raney (volume au repos, ml), pour la réaction de désoxygénation est de
35 1 g de substrat pour 6 ml de catalyseur.
11. Procédé selon la revendication 10, dans lequel le rapport de N-acyl-éphédrine (g) au catalyseur de nickel de Raney
(volume au repos, ml), pour la réaction de désoxygénation est de 1 g de substrat pour 2 ml de catalyseur.
40 12. Procédé selon la revendication 1, 2 ou 3, caractérisé en ce que l’hydrolyse acide est réalisée en utilisant une
solution aqueuse d’acide chlorhydrique.
45
50
55
22
EP 1 828 105 B1
This list of references cited by the applicant is for the reader’s convenience only. It does not form part of the European
patent document. Even though great care has been taken in compiling the references, errors or omissions cannot be
excluded and the EPO disclaims all liability in this regard.
• TAHKASAHI HIROSHI. Chem. Pharm. Bull., 1985, • KNOLL. Ger., vol. 968, 545 [0003]
vol. 33 (11), 4662-70 [0003] • A.LARIZZA. J. Med. Chem., 1966, vol. 9, 966-67
• HENRI PHILLIPE HUSSON. Synthetic communica- [0003]
tions, 1987, vol. 17 (6), 669-676 [0003] • SKINNER, HARRY F. Forensic Sci. Int., 1990, vol.
• SKINNER, HARRY P. Forensic Sci. Int., 1993, vol. 48 (2), 123-34 [0003]
60 (3), 155-62 [0003] • DERUITER ; CLARKE. J. Chrom. Sci., 1987, vol. 25,
• CERVINKA, OTAKAR. Collect. Czech. Chem. 38-42 [0011]
Comm, 1968, vol. 33 (11), 3551-7 [0003] • ALLEN ; KISER. J. Forensic Sciences, 1987, vol. 32
• MASANO ISUTSUMI. Science and Crime detection (4), 953-962 [0011]
(Japan, 1953, vol. 6, 50-2 [0003] • J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 1967, vol. 89, 4233 [0014]
• ADOLPH C. J. OPFERMANN. Brit., vol. 782, 887 • Tet. Lett., 1994, vol. 35, 5611 [0014]
[0003] • J. Org.Chem., 1988, vol. 53, 432, 3158 [0014]
• HAJICEK JOSEF. Czech. CS, vol. 272, 434 [0003] • DIETER ENDERS. Liebigs Ann / Recueil, 1997,
• KARL KINDLER. Ann., 1948, vol. 560, 215-21 1101-1113 [0020]
[0003]
23