1 Cement Treated Bases - Abdo

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 62
At a glance
Powered by AI
The text discusses various cement-based pavement materials and their uses, benefits of cement-treated base, and examples of cement-treated base pavement projects.

The text mentions that soils, gravel, crushed stone, slag, recycled HMA, and recycled concrete can be treated with cement.

The text discusses benefits such as providing an economical pavement base, allowing for decreased base thickness compared to unbound aggregate base, maintaining structural properties under varying moisture conditions, inhibiting fatigue cracking and rutting of asphalt surfaces, and being a sustainable paving option.

Concrete Airport Pavement Workshop, Nov 4-5, 09

Cement-Stabilized
Cement Stabilized Base Courses
Fares Y. Abdo,, P.E.
Market Manager, Pavements
Portland Cement Association
Cement-Treated Base Courses
„ Fundamentals
„ Materials
„ Mix Design
„ Thickness Design
g
„ Construction
„ Case Studies
Cement-Based Pavement Materials
Roller-Compacted
Roller Compacted Pervious Conventional
Concrete Concrete Concrete

FAA
Econocrete
P-306
ent

FAA Soil-Cement
Cement Conte

C
Cement-Treated
tT t d Cement-
Base/Subbase Treated
Base
P-301 &
P-304 Flowable Fill
Full-Depth
Reclamation

Cement-Modified
Soil

Water Content
Definition
Cement-Treated Base – a intimate mixture of
native and/or manufactured aggregates with
measured amounts of portland cement (and
possibly other cementitious materials) and
water that hardens after compaction and curing
to form a strong durable paving material
What materials can be treated with cement?

„ Soils (sand, silt, clay)


„ Gravel
„ Shale
„ Crushed
C h d stone
t
„ Slag
„ Recycled HMA
„ Recycled concrete
Are all materials suitable for CTB?

Problem Soils
„Organic soils
„Acid soils
„Sulfate soils
„Uniform sands
Why Use CTB?
„ Economical pavement base
„ Decreased base thickness compared to
unbound aggregate base
„ Structural properties maintained under varying
moisture conditions
„ High stiffness inhibits fatigue cracking and
rutting of asphalt surface
„ Sustainable paving option
FAA Base/Subbase Approved
Materials
P
Purpose off Base/Subbase
B /S bb Courses
C
(FAA AC 150/5320-6E)
„ Flexible pavements Asphalt

„ Principal structural components Base


Subbase
„ Distribute the loads to the (Req. if CBR<20)
f
foundation
d ti Subgrade
Improved Performance in Rutting and Fatigue Cracking
P P

Cement-Treated Base
Unstabilized Granular Base
P
Purpose off Base/Subbase
B /S bb Courses
C
(FAA AC 150/5320-6E)
„ Flexible pavements Asphalt

„ Principal structural component Base


Subbase
„ Distribute the loads to the (Req. if CBR<20)
f
foundation
d ti Subgrade

„ Rigid pavements
Concrete
„ Provide uniform stable support
Subbase

Subgrade
Materials for Base Course
FAA AC 150/5320-6E Flexible Pavement Design
I
Item B
Base C
Course M G
Max. Gross LLoad,
d
lbs.
P-208
P 208 Aggregate Base 60 000
60,000
P-209 Crushed Aggregate Base 100,000
P-211 Lime Rock Base N/A
/
P-219 Recycled Concrete Aggregate Base 100,000
P-304 Cement Treated Base N/A
/
P-306 Econocrete Subbase N/A
P-401 Plant Mix Bituminous Pavements N/A
P-403 HMA Base N/A
Materials for Subbase Course
FAA AC 150/5320-6E Flexible Pavement Design
I
Item S bb
Subbase C
Course1 Frost Penetrating
F P i
Subbase
P-154
P 154 Subbase Course 9
P-210 Caliche Base Course 9
P-212 Shell Base Course 9
P-213 Sand Clay Base Course X
P-301 Soil Cement Base Course X

1. Materials acceptable for base course can also be used for subbase course
Materials for Sbbase Course
FAA AC 150/5320-6E Rigid Pavement Design
I
Item S bb
Subbase C
Course M G
Max. Gross LLoad,
d
lbs.
P-154 Subbase Course 100,000
,
P-208 Aggregate Base Course 100,000
P-209 Crushed Aggregate Base Course 100,000
P-211 Lime Rock Base Course 100,000
P-301 Soil Cement Base Course 100,000
P 304
P-304 Cement Treated Base Course N/A
P-306 Econocrete Subbase Course N/A
P-401 Plant Mix Bituminous Pavements N/A
P-403 HMA Base Course N/A
Engineering Properties of CTB
Property1
P FAA P-301
P 301 FAA P-304
P 304 PCA CTB
(Soil Cement) (CTB)
7-Day Compressive N/A2 Under PCC: 300 min.;
Strength, psi 500 min.; 1000 max. 800 max.
Under HMA:
750 min.; 1000 max.
Elastic Modulus, ksi 250 500 600-1000
Poisson’s Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.15

1. Refer to FAA AC 150/5320-6E for durability requirements


2. FAA recommendations for P-301 are based on wet-dry and freeze-thaw tests
and strength should increase with age
CTB Mix Design
Strive
St i for
f a Balance
B l Between
B t
Strength
g and Performance
Mixture Design-Step 1
„ Determine moisture-density relationship
„ Select expected median cement content
(e.g. 6% by estimated dry weight)
„ Perform standard or modified Proctor test
(ASTM D558 or ASTM D1557)
„ Construct moisture-density curve
„ Determine optimum moisture content and
maximum dry density
Moisture-Density Relationship
Mix Design-Step 2
„ Mold specimens for compressive strength testing
„ Select range of cement contents
(
(e.g. 4%
4%, 6% andd 8% b
by d
dry weight
i ht off material)
t i l)
„ Use percent OMC from Step 1 and Mold two
specimens per cement content (ASTM
D559/560 or ASTM D1632)
„ Perform compressive strength testing
(ASTM D1633)
„ Plot cement content versus compressive
strength
Strength Testing
Strength vs. Cement Content
1000
ngth, psi

900

800
7-dayy Compresssive Stren

700

600

500

400

300

200
3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Cement Content, %
Mix Design-Step 3
„ Determine moisture-density relationship of target
cement content
„ Perform standard or modified Proctor test
(ASTM D558 or ASTM D1557)
„ Construct moisture-density curve
„ Determine optimum moisture content and
maximum dry density
Durability Testing
„ Specimens containing various cementitious
contents molded per ASTM D558 and tested per:
„ ASTM D559; wet-dry cycles
„ ASTM D560; freeze
freeze-thaw
thaw cycles
„Select min. cement content that meets weight
loss limits set by agency having jurisdiction
Thickness Design
Thickness Design
■ FAA: FAARFIELD Computer Program
■ PCA Methods of Thickness Design
■ Experience
■ Mechanistic-Empirical
M h i ti E i i l M Methods
th d
■ AASHTO MEPDG (guide accepted)
■ PCA-Pave (near completion)
Thickness Design
■ Factors
■ Subgrade Strength
■ Pavement Design Period
■ T ffi
Traffic
■ Typical Thickness
■ Heavy traffic: 6 to 9 inches
■ Highways
g y and airport
p runways
y and
taxiways: 6 to 12 inches
Construction
Construction

■ Two methods
■ Plant Mix
■ Road Mix (in-place)
(in place)
Plant Mix: Puggmill
„ High production
„ Usually close or on-site
„ Mob/demob cost
Continuous Pugmill Mixing Chamber
Plant Mix: Central Concrete Batch Plant
■ Highly accurate
proportioning
■ Local availability
■ Smaller output
capacity
■ Longer mix times than
conventional concrete
■ Frequent cleaning
■ Dedicated production
Plant Mix: Dry Concrete Batch Plant
■ Highest local availability
■ Desirable method for the
smaller-sized jobs
■ 2-step process
■ Feed into transit mixers
■ Discharge into dumps
■ Low production
■ Frequent cleaning
■ Segregation
S i
Construction - Road Mix
■ In-situ or mixed in place materials
■ Wider variety of materials
■ Dryy or
o slurry
s u y cement
ce e t application
app cat o method
et od
Road Mix Method

1. Spread cement
2. Add water if necessary and mix
3. Compact
p
4. Grade
5
5. Cure
Portland Cement Addition

Dry spread

Slurry spread
Addition of Water

Gravity dump and mix

Via drum of mixer


Road Mixing

With water

Without water
Plant vs. Road Mix Considerations
„ Traffic loading/agency requirements
„ FAA P-304 spec includes plant mix only
„ Qualityy of in-situ materials
Q
„ Cost
„ Haul distances: material sources, p
plant, jjobsite
„ Design thickness (one or multiple lifts)
„ Sustainable considerations (Reduce, Reuse and Recycling)
Plant vs. Road Mix Considerations
„ Dust controls/location of project

Tuscaloosa, AL Palo Verde, AZ


Spreading/Placing
Grading/Compaction
Compaction
■ High density is critical
for strength and
durability
■ Steel-drum
■ Rubber-tire roller
■ Sheepsfoot roller
Curing
■ Required for surface durability and normal strength
g
gain
■ Needed to retain moisture
■ Three methods:
▪ Moist Cure
▪ Concrete Curing Compound
▪ Asphalt Emulsion
Moist Cure

■ Continuous
operation
■P
Preventt excessive
i
drying
Concrete Curing Compound

■ White-pigmented
concrete curing
compounds
■ Provide adequate
coverage
■ May form a bond
breaker
Bituminous Curing Compound

■E
Excellent
ll t
moisture barrier
■G
Goodd for
f asphalt
h lt
cap
Applications
Where are stabilized materials used?
„ L volume
Low l roadways
r d
„ Residential streets
„ State routes
„ Interstate highways
„ Airport runways and taxiways
„ Parking lots
„ Industrial storage facilities
„ Port facilities
„ Truck terminals
In other words…
„ Commercial sites
any pavement structure!
Residential Streets

Bells Crossing, Mooresville, NC, 2008


Example: County Road Value-
V l
Original Engineered
■ Upgrade 2-lane to 4-lane route Design Option
■ Value-Engineered
Value Engineered Option Asphalt Int. & Asphalt Int. &
■ $900,000 savings on Surface Surface
238,000 SY ($3.78/SY)
■ Faster construction ((5 months 3.5” Asphalt Base
Crushed
C
Cement-t
savings) 8” Stone Base
Treated Base
■ Less mined and processed
materials
8”
8 Crushed
Stone Base
Subgrade

Subgrade

SC County Road 5
Parking Areas
Design/Bid As Sustainable Contributions
Section Constructed ■ Reduced
export/import/fuel use
Asphalt
4”
4 6” 8” RCC
6”-8” ■ Less mined and
processed materials
Crushed
6”
6 Soil-Cement ■ Reduced excavation
12” Stone Base ■ Faster construction
Base
■ Cooler pavement
Subgrade
■ Used in-situ
in situ materials
Subgrade ■ Less damage to area
roads

BMW, SC, 2009


Washington Dulles
Airport
p Runwayy 4,, 2008

18” PCC w/
dowelled transverse
j i t att 20 ft
joints

6” CTB, 6% cement

12” Cement-
Stabilized Subgrade,
5% cement
Washington Dulles
Airport
p Runwayy 4

■ Runway 4 completed in 2008


■ Runway 12 was completed in
2004
FedEx Hub at Alliance
Airport Fort Worth, TX,
1997
Taxiway & Ramp

Truck Terminal &


14” PCC C t i
Container St
Storage
g

10” JRCP
9” CTB

9” Cement-Treated 6” Cement-Treated
Subgrade Subgrade
FedEx Hub at Alliance Airport Fort Worth, TX

■ 50-yr design life


■ C
Completed
l t d in
i 1997
■ 330,000 yd2
■ Cement-treated subgrade
■ 7 % cement, 250 psi,
reduced PI from 38 to less
than 12
■ Cement –treated
treated base
■ 750 psi at 28 days
DFW SE Perimeter
Taxiway,
y, 2008
■ First perimeter taxiway in U.S.
■ Built for safety and reduce
congestion delays

18” CRCP
18

12” CTB

12” Lime-Treated
Subgrade
DFW SE Perimeter
Taxiway
■ Completed in 2008
■ 225,000 yd2
■ Data will be analyzed before
building the remaining 3 loops
McGhee Tyson Airport
Knoxville, TN, 2008
■ Completed in 2008
■ 9,000 yd2
■ CTB per FAA PP-304
304

16” PCC

6” CTB, 5% (C+FA)

8” Lime-Treated
Subgrade
Charlotte-Douglas
Airport, 2008
■ Completed in 2008
■ 256,000 yd2
■ CTB per FAA PP-304
304
Dover AFB, Delaware,
2008
■ Old concrete and asphalt
crushed and recycled
■ 50% recycledl d and
d 50% iin-situ
i
soil; sandy clays and clear
sand
■ CTB 1212” thick
■ 42 to 80 lb/SY depending on
the in-situ and recycled
materials
■ 300,000 SY
■ 58 days
M Information
More I f ti

www.cement.org/pavements
fabdo@cement.org

You might also like