1.1 Polymers: 1.1.1 Thermoplastics, Thermosets and Elastomers
1.1 Polymers: 1.1.1 Thermoplastics, Thermosets and Elastomers
1.1 Polymers: 1.1.1 Thermoplastics, Thermosets and Elastomers
1.1 POLYMERS
Polymers are high molecular weight organic substances that have
usually been synthesized from low molecular weight compounds
through the process of polymerization, using addition reaction or
condensation reaction.
In addition polymerization, the reaction is initiated by a free radical
which is usually formed due to the decomposition of a relatively
unstable component in the reacting species. In this reaction, repeating
units add one at a time to the radical chain, and reasonably high
molecular weight polymers can be formed in a short time by this
polymerization.
In condensation polymerization, the reaction takes place between
two polyfunctional molecules to produce one larger polyfunctional
molecule with the possible elimination of a small molecule such as
water. Long reaction times are essential for forming high molecular
weight polymers by this step reaction.
An elementary introduction to polymers is given here and those
wishing to gain more knowledge about the physics, chemistry and
engineering aspects of polymers should consult some of the standard
references [1-13] on the subject.
Polymers formed through the polymerization processes discussed
above can be classified in a number of different ways based on
certain chosen characteristics for comparison.
1.2 FILLERS
The term 'filler' in the present context is used for describing those
inert, solid materials which are physically dispersed in the polymer
matrix, without significantly affecting the molecular structure of the
polymer. Further, the term is restricted to those materials which are
in the form of discrete particles or of fibers not exceeding a few
inches in length. Continuous filaments or fabrics either woven or
nonwoven are not included in this category of fillers discussed
Table 1.2 Examples of rigid and flexible fillers
Filler type
Rigid Flexible
Aluminum oxide Asbestos fiber
Barium carbonate Cotton flock
Calcium carbonate Cotton !inters
Calcium hydroxide Jute fiber
Calcium silicate Kevlar fiber
Clay Nylon fiber
Glass fiber Polyester fiber
Magnesium hydroxide Sisal
Metal fiber
Mica
Talc
Wollastonite
herein. Readers wishing to know more about fillers may refer to the
excellent handbook on the subject [25].
Filler categorization can be done in a number of different ways as
shown in Tables 1.2-1.4. In the following, a brief discussion is given
under a variety of headings based on certain chosen characteristics
for comparison.
produced are not exactly spherical when viewed under the scanning
electron microscope. Thus, the terms spherical or ellipsoidal can be
viewed as those referring to nearly spherical or nearly ellipsoidal
fillers.
When the physical form of the filler is two-dimensional, the fillers
may be available as flakes (larger size plates) or platelets (smaller size
plates). Thus, mica particles exist as flakes whereas clay particles exist
as platelets.
In the one-dimensional form, filler may be available in the thicker
variety as a fiber or thinner (acicular-needle-shaped) variety as a
whisker. Fillers available as fibers are glass, nylon, polyester, carbon
and so on. Wollastonite stands out as a good example of an acicular
filler.
5. Thermal stability
6. Chemical resistivity
7. Abrasiveness or wear
8. Toxicity
9. Recyclability
Undoubtedly the idea of adding the fillers is to achieve reduction
in cost. However, there are some special type of fillers which are
used purely on a functional basis with an accepted trade-off in the
cost reduction, for example, some fiber glass reinforcements for
polyesters, barium ferrite as a magnetizable filler, metallic powders
for electrical and thermal conductivity improvement. In fact all these
specialty fillers are more expensive than general purpose fillers and
in some cases even more expensive than the polymer which they fill.
In any case, the cost-effectiveness of the filler ought to be determined.
The objective should be to compare the full cost of the completed
product with and without the filler.
The first step involves obtaining the raw material costs which must
be converted from cost per pound to cost per volume. This is because
cost per pound of the filler is meaningless unless adjusted for specific
gravity differences. The volume of the polymer that is displaced by
the filler becomes the main consideration. A three-step calculation
method [41] can be used to get the polymer saved and thus to
determine the cost-effectiveness of filled systems. If the filled polymer
system is compounded in-house, then that cost has to be included.
Similarly, added labour cost or savings due to the use of filled polymer
systems must be considered. Often it is found that a minimum of 30
volume percent of low-cost filler is required to get a cost benefit
when switching from unfilled polymer to filled polymer system.
When selecting a filler, it is important to bear in mind that for
adequate stress transfer, wettability and good adhesion between the
filler and the polymer is essential. Physical properties like, for example,
the density should be low so that the filler stays in suspension or at
worst is able to be resuspended with minimum mixing. Thermal
stability and chemical resistivity are also very important so that the
filler does not change characteristics during the preparation of the filled
polymer system. Fibrous materials and non-symmetrical fillers are more
abrasive than others and could cause increased wear to the processing
equipment. Hence care has to be taken when selecting such fillers as
they may not turn out to be cost-effective due to excessive damage to
the equipment. Also the effect of fillers on polymer flow characteristics,
namely, the rheology must be carefully assessed as that determines its
processibility and hence is a very important parameter.