Design of A 1 Composite Right/Left-Handed Transmission Line Y. Li, Q. Zhu, Y. Yan, and S. Xu
Design of A 1 Composite Right/Left-Handed Transmission Line Y. Li, Q. Zhu, Y. Yan, and S. Xu
Design of A 1 Composite Right/Left-Handed Transmission Line Y. Li, Q. Zhu, Y. Yan, and S. Xu
B. Zhou
Shanghai Spaceflight Electronic Technology Institute
Shanghai 201109, China
1. INTRODUCTION
2. THEORY
...... Input
1:1 1:N-2 1:N-1
power divider power divider Power divider
50Ω main microstrip line
Folded
microstrip line
Ls Cs Cs Ls
L0
Lp Cp Cg Cp Lp
C0
S-Parameters (dB)
0 180
-10 90
ϕ S21(deg)
-20 0
-30 -90
-40 -180
6 9 12 6 9 12
Frequency (GHz) Frequency (GHz)
1 √
γ = α + jβ = cosh−1 AD (3)
d
Here
1 2
A = D = − ωCp − 2ωLs −
ωLp ωCs
2
1 1
+ ωLs − 1 − ωCg +1
ωCs ωL0 − ωC
0
1 1
+ ωLs − 1 − ωCg (4)
ωCs ωL0 − ωC0
αd
βd
Impedance transformer
Output1 Z01
branch line
Z in1 V1
Zin2
Output2 Input
V2 50 Ω line
the input port of the feed network, the larger power dividing ratio is
needed. Generally, a 3-port divider with larger power dividing ratio
needs a branch line with higher characteristic impedance. If only
the quarter-wave transformers have been used to realize impedance
matching, the branch line will be too thin to fabricate. For example,
when dividing ratio N = 8, the width of the quarter-wave transformer
is about 0.1 mm and it is too narrow to be manufactured by thin
films technology. Combination of a quarter-wave transformer and an
exponential transformer [12] can tackle the difficulty. Fig. 7(a) is the
schematic of 3-port power dividers realized only by a quarter-wave
transformer for N ≤ 7, Fig. 7(b) is the schematic by combination of a
quarter-wave transformer and an exponential transformer for N > 7.
Port 2 Port2
50Ω line
50Ω line exponential
transformer
branch line
λ /4 transformer
branch line
λ /4 transformer
open-ended
open-ended
stub
stub
Port3 Port 1 Port 3 Port 1
50Ω main line 50Ω main line
<7
(a) N- (b) N > 7
4.7 mm
L1 L2
4.7mm
6.0 mm
0.78mm
L3
WS
(a) (b)
Frequency(GHz)
proposed CRLH TL unit
RH TL (d)
12.8mm meandering line structure
90
60
Phase(deg)
30
7.8mm
0
-30
-60
Port2~Port21 (output )
Port1 ( input)
(a) Layout
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
2 3
(b) Photograph
3. DESIGN EXAMPLE
-22
Simulated
-24 Measured
-26
S11(dB)
-28
-30
-32
8.8 9.0 9.2 9.4 9.6
Frequency(GHz)
4. RESULTS
Figure 10 shows the simulated and measured S11 of the series feed
network. Fig. 11(a) and (b) reveal that the ripples of the simulated
S2,1-S21,1 200
-1 0
150
100
Amplitude(dB)
-1 5
Phase(deg)
50
-2 0
0
-2 5 -50
-100
-3 0 S11
-150
-3 5 -200
8. 8 9.0 9 .2 9. 4 9.6 8.8 9.0 9.2 9.4 9.6
F requ enc y(G Hz) Frequency(GHz)
(a) (b)
-12 -12
-14 -14
Amplitude(dB)
Amplitude(dB)
(c)
150 150
100 100
50 50
Phase(deg)
Phase(deg)
0 0
S7,1
S2,1
-50 S3,1
-50 S8,1
S9,1
S4,1 S10,1
-100 S5,1 -100
S11,1
S6,1
-150 -150
8.8 9.0 9.2 9.4 9.6 8.8 9.0 9.2 9.4 9.6
Frequency(GHz) Frequency(GHz)
(d)
amplitude and phase distributions among all 20 output ports are less
than 2 dB and 10◦ , respectively. The measured performances are
shown in Fig. 11(c) and (d). Because of the symmetry, only the
performances of output ports2–11 are plotted for simplicity. The errors
in fabrication, especially in the fabrication of the CRLH TL unit, are
considered to be the cause of the discrepancy of the measured and
simulated results. Moreover, the precision of the metallized holes might
be a main cause of the ripple.
5. CONCLUSION
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
REFERENCES