JournalNX - Social Networking System
JournalNX - Social Networking System
JournalNX - Social Networking System
106 | P a g e
Proceedings of International Conference on Advances in Computer Technology and Management (ICACTM)
In Association with Novateur Publications IJRPET-ISSN No: 2454-7875
ISBN No. 978-81-921768-9- 5
February, 23rd and 24th, 2018
III. SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE To recognize the unique feature of the face, the system
Existing System: recognizes the basic pixels and creates the base feature
Most of the friend suggestions mechanism relies of the face. Further a similar possible image of the face is
on pre-existing user relationships to pick friend created using this base feature and the image is classified
candidates like friend of friend. under various folders. The image data previously stored
Facebook relies on a social link analysis among is compared and the contents from the image are
those who already share common friends i.e. detected and conclusions are made and conversation is
mutual friend and recommends symmetrical done accordingly.
users as potential friends. The rules to group Eigen face algorithm has been used to implement face
people together include: recognition. If the face is recognized, user is greeted by
Habits or life style his name. New users are registered by taking a snapshot
Attitudes of their face and storing it for further interactions.
Tastes Human and robot interact with the help of speech
Moral standards recognition and
Economic level; and People they already know. language processing. Human responses from all the
Disadvantages Of Existing System chats are stored and the database keeps growing with
Existing social networking services recommend every interaction. Sentences are processed to find out its
friends to users based on their social graphs, object and a dictionary made in MySQL is used to store
which may not be the most appropriate to all the words and its related part of speech, example: eat-
reflect a user’s preferences on friend selection in verb, chair-noun, beautiful-adjective, etc. Since the
real life database grows with every interaction, the robot’s
Proposed System accuracy and aptness increases with it.
A web services for social networks, which The AI perceived human speech in real time. A speech
recommends friends to users based on their life recognition software (Dragon naturally speaking from
styles instead of social graphs. nuance, LLC) was first applied to convert speech into
We model a user’s daily life as life documents, text. Next, a 10-second temporal window was used to
from which his/her life styles are extracted by define a local context. Spoken utterances within a
using the Latent Dirichlet Allocation algorithm. context were then compared to spot frequent words that
Similarity metric to measure the similarity of life were further processed in two specific ways. First,
styles between users, and calculate users’ frequent words were selected as candidate words for
Advantages Of Proposed System object names and would be linked with visual input to
Recommendeds potential friends to users if they compute word-object associations. Second, frequent
share similar life styles. words were added to a word list that the AI maintained
The feedback mechanism allows us to measure to keep track of those words that the robot heard before.
the satisfaction of users, by providing a user In speech production, the AI would selectively produce
interface that allows the user to rate the friend those words. In a way, this mechanism made the AI like a
list copycat – repeating what it just heard most frequently in
the recent past. For example, if a human teacher
happened to say “hello” to the AI in multiple times, the AI
would say “hello” back to the human teacher. Thus, the
AI learning system was transparent and straightforward
purely driven by statistical regularities in the data
without complicated inference. The goal was to show
how better data from interaction may lead to better
statistical learning.
107 | P a g e
Proceedings of International Conference on Advances in Computer Technology and Management (ICACTM)
In Association with Novateur Publications IJRPET-ISSN No: 2454-7875
ISBN No. 978-81-921768-9- 5
February, 23rd and 24th, 2018
the future work can be four-fold. First, we would like to 4) L. Bian and H. Holtzman.Online friend
evaluate our system on large-scale field experiments. recommendation through personality matching and
Second, we intend to implement the life style extraction collaborative filtering. Proc. of UBICOMM, pages
using LDA and the iterative matrix-vector multiplication 230-235, 2011.
method in user impact ranking incrementally, so that 5) C. M. Bishop. Pattern recognition and machine
Friendbook would be scalable to large-scale systems. learning.Springer New York, 2006.
Third, the similarity threshold used for the friend- 6) Eunjoon Cho, Seth A. Myers, and Jure Leskovec.
matching graph is fixed in our current prototype of Friendship and mobility:user movement in
Friendbook. It would be interesting to explore the location-based social networks. In Proceedingsof
adaption of the threshold for each edge and see whether the 17th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on
it can better represent the similarity relationship on the KnowledgeDiscovery and Data Mining, San Diego,
friend-matching graph. At last, we plan to incorporate CA, USA, August 21-24, 2011,pages 1082–1090,
more sensors on the mobile phones into the system and 2011.
also utilize the information from wearable equipments 7) Jeffrey Fekete. Making the Big Game: Tales of an
(e.g., Fitbit, iwatch, Google glass, Nike+, and Galaxy Gear) Accidental Spectator.page 142, 2013.
to discover more interesting and meaningful life styles. 8) Xiang Ji. Social data integration and analytics for
health intelligence.In VLDB PhD Workshop, 2014.
REFERENCES 9) V. Levenshtein. Binary Codes Capable of Correcting
1) G. R. Arce. Nonlinear Signal Processing: A Statistical Deletions, Insertions, and Reversals. Soviet Physics-
Approach. John Wiley & Sons, 2005. Doklady, 10(8):707–710, 1966.
2) B. Bahmani, A. Chowdhury, and A. Goel.Fast 10) Xingjie Liu, Qi He, YuanyuanTian, Wang-Chien Lee,
incremental and personalized pagerank. Proc. of John McPherson, andJiawei Han. Event-based social
VLDB Endowment, volume 4, pages 173-184, 2010. networks: linking the online and offline social
3) J. Biagioni, T. Gerlich, T. Merrifield, and J. worlds. In The 18th ACM SIGKDD International
Eriksson.EasyTracker: Automatic Transit Tracking, Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data
Mapping, and Arrival Time Prediction Using Mining, KDD ’12, Beijing, China, August 12-16,
Smartphones. Proc. of SenSys, pages 68-81, 2011. 2012, pages 1032–1040, 2012.
108 | P a g e