ANSELL - Gloves Standards
ANSELL - Gloves Standards
ANSELL - Gloves Standards
Contents
7 Standard EN374:2003
Gloves giving protection from chemicals and micro-organisms
9 Standard EN388:2003
Gloves giving protection from mechanical risks
10 Standard EN407:2004
Gloves giving protection from thermal hazards
11 Standard EN511:2006
Gloves giving protection from cold
11 Standard EN421:2010
Gloves giving protection from radioactive contamination and ionising radiation
Ansell supports the development and maintenance of the highest As a result, they have implemented a number of identical standards
hand protection standards to help improve the health and safety to those used in Europe.
at work for all workers.
For example, standard EN420 (AS/NZS 2161.2:1998) – Occupational
The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and Protective Gloves, General Requirements – defines requirements
Australian/New Zealand Standards (AS/NZS) help classify specific for all protective gloves (except electrical and medical gloves) for
product attributes and communicate the quality and protection glove construction, cleaning, comfort and efficiency, marking
levels of personal protection equipment. and information.
The standards are designed to assist managers in the provision While the majority of the Australian/New Zealand occupational
and maintenance of workplace safety levels. glove standards are identical to the European standards, there
are instances where the European standard has been revised,
The elimination of health and safety workplace hazards is but the Australian/New Zealand standard has not been changed.
mandated by government legislation. Where they cannot be
eliminated, employers are responsible for reducing hazards This is why, for example, the protection against cold standard
to a minimum as is reasonably practical. AS/NZS 2161.5:1998 is not the same as the European cold
standard EN511:2006.
Ansell is dedicated to supporting the highest available regulatory
standards. Many countries across the Asia-Pacific region have The requirements are similar but the two standards use different
adopted the established European Union (EN) standards for their testing methodologies.
own use.
EN protection standards
Making gloves that work as hard as you do is the code we live by.
Knowing the EN standards is essential as it tells you which Ansell
glove works best for which application. Use this guide to build your
knowledge bank of the EN standards we use at Ansell.
The figures are derived from specific tests for attributes such
as cut resistance.
0493
Note: The original PPE Directive 89/686/EEC has been amended by both the 93/95/EEC Directive and the CE marking Directives 93/68/EEC and 95/58/EEC.
Innocuousness
• The gloves themselves shouldn’t cause any harm to the user.
• pH of the glove should be between 3.5 and 9.5.
• Chromium (VI) content should be below detection (<3 ppm).
• Natural rubber gloves shall be tested on extractable proteins
as per EN455-3.
The marking should be legible throughout the life of the glove. 5 5.0
Where marking of the glove is not possible in view of the
characteristics of the glove, it should be mentioned on the *Pin that can be picked up with gloved hand three times/30 seconds (mm).
first packaging enclosure.
Sizing of gloves
Marking of the packaging immediately containing
the gloves Glove Fits Hand Minimum
• Name and address of the manufacturer or representative. size hand circumference/ length of the
size length (mm) glove (mm)
• Glove and size designation.
• CE mark. 6 6 152/160 220
• Usage info
7 7 178/171 230
- simple design: ‘for minimal risks only’ or
- intermediate design or complex design: relevant pictograms. 8 8 203/182 240
• When protection is limited to part of the hand, this shall be
9 9 229/192 250
mentioned (e.g. ‘palm protection style only’).
• Reference to where information can be obtained. 10 10 254/204 260
Instructions for use (to be supplied when the glove 11 11 279/215 270
is placed on the market)
• Name and address of the manufacturer or representative. A glove sizing chart has been provided overleaf.
• Glove designation.
All gloves with a cuff are colour coded for size
• Size range available. identification as below
• CE mark.
• Care and storage instruction.
Glove Glove Overedge Overedge colour
size size colour for Vantage® and
• Instructions and limitations of use. ProFood™
• A list of substances used in the glove which are known
6 XS Purple Brown
to cause allergies.
• A list of all substances in the glove shall be made available 7 S Red Green
upon request.
8 M Yellow White
• Name and address of notified body that certified the product.
9 L Brown Brown
10 XL Black Black
Scope
Performance Acceptable Inspection
This standard specifies the capability of gloves to protect the user
level quality level unit levels
against chemicals and/or micro-organisms.
Level 3 <0.65 G1
Definitions
Penetration Level 2 <1.5 G1
Permeation
The rubber and plastic films in gloves do not always act as barriers
to liquids. Sometimes they can act as sponges, soaking up the
liquids and holding them against the skin. It is therefore necessary
to measure breakthrough times, or the time taken for the hazardous
liquid to come in contact with the skin.
Requirements
• The minimum liquid-proof section of the glove shall be at least
equal to the minimum length of the gloves specified in EN420.
• Penetration: A glove shall not leak when tested with an air and
water leak test, and shall be tested and inspected in compliance
with the acceptable quality level.
Warning: The chemical data information does not necessarily reflect the actual duration in the workplace.
The ‘chemical resistant’ glove pictogram must be accompanied by a minimum three digit code. This code refers to the code
letters of the chemicals (from a list of 12 standard defined chemicals), for which a breakthrough time of at least 30 minutes
has been obtained.
Permeation
Each chemical tested is classified in terms of breakthrough time (performance level 0 to 6).
Measured Protection
breakthrough time index
The ‘low chemical resistant’ or ‘waterproof’ glove pictogram is to be used for those gloves that do not achieve a breakthrough
time of at least 30 minutes against at least three chemicals from the defined list, but which comply with the penetration test.
The ‘micro-organism’ pictogram is to be used when the glove conforms to at least a performance level 2 for the penetration test.
Scope
This standard applies to all kinds of protective gloves in respect of physical and mechanical aggressions caused by abrasion, blade cut,
puncture and tearing.
abcd
a. Abrasion resistance
Based on the number of cycles required to abrade through the sample glove.
c. Tear resistance
Based on the amount of force required to tear the sample.
d. Puncture resistance
Based on the amount of force required to pierce the sample with a standard-sized point.
0 1 2 3 4 5
a. Abrasion resistance (cycles) <100 100 500 2,000 8,000
b. Blade cut resistance (factor) <1.2 1.2 2.5 5.0 10.0 20.0
These performance levels must be prominently displayed alongside the pictogram on the gloves and on the packaging which immediately
contains the gloves.
Scope
This standard specifies thermal performance for protective gloves against heat and/or fire.
Gloves must achieve at least performance level 1 for abrasion and tear.
Scope
This standard applies to any gloves to protect the hands against convective and contact cold down to -50 °C.
C. Penetration by water (0 or 1)
0 = water penetration.
1 = no water penetration.
All gloves must achieve at least performance level 1 for abrasion and tear.
Standard EN421:2010
Gloves giving protection from radioactive contamination and ionising radiation
Relevant Australian standard: AS/NZS 2161.8:2002
Scope
This standard applies to gloves to protect from ionising radiation and radioactive contamination.
• To protect from radioactive contamination, the glove has to be liquid proof and needs to pass the penetration test defined in EN374.
• For gloves used in containment enclosures, the glove shall pass in addition a specific air pressure leak test.
• Materials may be modelled by their behaviour to ozone cracking. This test is optional and can be used as an aid to selecting gloves.
• To protect from ionising radiation, the glove has to contain a certain amount of lead or equivalent metal, quoted as lead
equivalence. This lead equivalence must be marked on each glove.
www.ansellguardian.com
Assessment Standardisation
SKU Management – reduce
waste and eliminate unnecessary
SKUs. Prevention Injury Prevention – reduce
SKU
the risk and cost of employee
injuries.
PRODUCTIVITY
PERFORMANCE
TRAINING
Advance Performance –
matching the appropriate PPE
Productivity – improve output
to the task and the right service
and eliminate waste.
to the customer. Training – educate employees in
proper selection, usage and disposal
of PPE products.
Key benefits
Increased employee safety Productivity
Reduced hand injuries and injury costs: Maximised glove performance for each application:
• Reduced waste.
Reduced overall cost of ownership
Global solutions applied to multiple workstations Scope and capability
and sites, from one country to another:
Standardised procedures and best practices:
• Optimise use of correct products.
•R
educed and simplified order management
• Implement controls. and inventory.
Email: protection@ap.ansell.com
Website: www.ansell.com.au www.ansellasiapacific.com
MKTOCC542V1
Ansell ® and ™ are trademarks owned by Ansell Limited or one of its affiliates. © 2011 Ansell Limited. All rights reserved.