Chapter 4 - Differential Cost Analysis PDF
Chapter 4 - Differential Cost Analysis PDF
Chapter 4 - Differential Cost Analysis PDF
Payongayong
Y2007 edition
4.1
a CM lost for eliminating Wise P50,000 - P26,000 = 24,000.00
Cost avoided - the direct fixed costs 19,000.00
Net CM lost from Wise 5,000.00
Increase in CM from the increase in sales of Bud
(P70,000 - P32,000) x 20% = 7,600.00
Net increase CM by eliminating Wise 2,600.00
b Decision: Eliminate Wise because Total net income will increase by P2,600
4.3
1 Selling price 41.00
Less, Variable costs:
(P7 + P30 + P3 ) 40.00
Net increase in revenues 1.00
4.4
Special order price per unit 20.00
Variable cost to manufacture 16.00
Net (CM) income per unit 4.00
Accept the order
4.5
a Special order price per unit 40.00
Variable cost to manufacture 35.00
Net CM per unit 5.00
total number of units 5,000
Total CM 25,000.00
Less, Total shipping costs 2,000.00
Net increase in income 23,000.00
b Accept
4.6
a Variable cost of goods sold P980,000 x .80 / 25,000 = 31.36
Variable operating costs P170,000 x .70 / 25,000 = 4.76
Total variablecost per unit 36.12
Special order price 40.00
CM per unit 3.88
Total number of units 500
Total 1,940.00
Less, Shipping costs 800.00
Net increase in income 1,140.00
b accept
4.7
Total cost to make 88,000.00
Total cost to buy:
Purchase price 80,000.00
Fixed costs unavoided 12,000.00
Total 92,000.00
Less, opportunity cost (CM from other product) 5,000.00 87,000.00
Net advantage to buy 1,000.00
4.8
a Relevant cost Relevant cost
to make to buy
Direct materials 1.50
Direct labor 1.80
Variable overhead (1.80 x 30%) 0.54
Purchase price 4.00
3.84 4.00
Number of units 200,000 200,000
Total relevant costs 768,000.00 800,000.00
Net advantage to make 32,000.00
b make
4.9
Selling price if process further 25.00
Selling price if sell as is 21.00
Incremental selling price 4.00
Incremental cost of processing further
(P1.00 + P.25 + P1.00) 2.25
Net increase in income 1.75
Process further
4.12
a Sales of Division B 300,000.00
Less, Variable cost of Div B
COGS P200,000 x 80% = 160,000.00
S & A P120,000 x 20% = 24,000.00 184,000.00
Contribution margin 116,000.00
Less, Direct fixed costs avoided:
COGS 30,000.00
S&A 30,000.00 60,000.00
Net Direct CM of Div. B - positive 56,000.00
RETAIN Div B.
b Total income Total income
With Div B W/out Div B
Sales 700,000.00 400,000.00
Cost of goods sold 350,000.00 160,000.00
Gross Profit 350,000.00 240,000.00
Selling and Adm expense 320,000.00 266,000.00
Net income 30,000.00 (26,000.00)
Retain Div B, decrease in net income of P56,000 if eliminated.
4.13
Sales of Southern Division 300,000.00
Less, Variable cost of Div B
COGS P200,000 x 80% = 160,000.00
OE P120,000 x 70% = 84,000.00 244,000.00
Contribution margin 56,000.00
Less, Direct fixed costs avoided:
COGS FC = P200,000 x 20% = 40,000.00
S & A FC = P120,000 x 30% + 36,000.00
Total Fixed costs 76,000.00
Percentage of FC that can be eliminated 40% 30,400.00
Net Direct CM of Div. B - positive 25,600.00
RETAIN Southern Division.
Total income Total income
With Southern W/out Southern
Sales 1,300,000.00 1,000,000.00
Cost of goods sold 850,000.00 674,000.00
Gross Profit 450,000.00 326,000.00
Selling and Adm expense 220,000.00 121,600.00
Net income 230,000.00 204,400.00
Decrease in total net income 25,600.00
Decrease in total net income if Souther Division is eliminated. Retain the division
4.14 Product 22 Product 44
CM per unit 7.50 25.00
MH required to produce one unit 15 minutes 75 minutes
or .25 hour 1.25 hour
4.16
a Incremental cost to make + opportunity cost
P15 + P40 + P10 + (P50,000 / 4,000) = 77.50
4.17
a Sales 110,000 x P15 1,650,000.00
Variable cost 110,000 x P5.55 610,500.00
Contribution margin 1,039,500.00
Fixed costs P450,000 + P210,000 660,000.00
Operating income 379,500.00
4.18
1 Five years together
2 The loss on disposal of the old machine combines the lump-sum write-off (an irrelevant item) with the
disposal value ( a relevant item), P5,000 - P2,000 = P3,000 loss on disposal. Because of the
inclusion of an irrelevant iten, this amount does not affect the computation in requirement 1. It is
best to keep the lump-sum write off and the disposal value separate.
4.19
1 The only relevant item is the P300 to be received for the calendars. Profit will be P300 higher if the
the offer is accepted than if it is rejected.
2 The P800 is called a sunk cost, that will not be affected by the decision.
2 On some occassions, qualitative factors may be used as the deciding factor rather than the
quantitative factor, especially if the difference in amount is insignificant. A small company may not
be reliable with respect to the assurance of supply or delivery. Sometimes, the company may be
willing to invest in order to have control over the supply of the components. The division manager
may have made the right decision for the wrong reason. He incorrectly ignored avoidable fixed costs,
leading to a mistaken belief that making the components was less costly by P.45 per unit or
P45,000 in total. The P50,000 avoidable fixed costs makes the puchase option less costly by P5,000
If the manager's decision is to make the component, it should be because forgoing profits of P5,000
has a long-run qualitative benefit of more than P5,000, not because the bid is greater than the
variable cost.
4.22
1 Revenues with united airlines personnel (P50 x 50) 2,500.00
Revenues without united airlines personnel (P100 x 50) 5,000.00
The opportunity cost here is the revenue of P5,000, because in its strict sense, the variable
cost of servicing the room is identical.
3 Let X = % of occupancy
Then P90X = P50
X = P50 / P90 = 55.56%
Or using the indifference point. To be indifferent, Sheraton would have to generate the same rent
2 Nonquantitative factors that could influence management in its decision to manufacture matching
capes and handbags include:
accuracy of forecasted increase in dress sales
accuracy of forecasted product mix
company image from dress manufacturer only to a more extensive supplier of women's apparel
competition from other manufacturers of women's apparel
whether there is adequate capacity (labor, facilities, storage, etc.)
4.25
1 The salesman's analysis is faulty because it includes depreciation on the old equipment, which is
irrelevant. Moreover, both the total and unit costs are based on an annual volume of 40,000 units,
which may not necessarily be accurate.
4.26
B-1 B-2
CM per unit 10.00 12.00
Hours required per unit 2 hours 3 hours
CM per hour 5.00 4.00
Ranking first second
Market limit 150 units 100 units
Units produced 150 units 50 units
hours used 300 hours 150 hours
4.27
Direct CM lost from Gifts
Sales 50,000.00
Less direct costs:
COGS 40,000.00
Selling Exp at 15% 7,500.00 47,500.00
Decrease in Net income 2,500.00
4.28
CM lost 8,000 x P6 48,000.00
Avoidable Fixed costs 50,000.00
Increase in Net income (2,000.00)
Cost avoided is greater than CM earned therefore, increase in net income.
4.31
Special order selling price 1000 x P17 17,000.00
Less, relevant cost of special order
Variable cost 1000 x P12 12,000.00
Selling & Adm. Cost 1000 x P2 2,000.00
14,000.00
Increase in net income 3,000.00
4.32
bings bangs bongs
CM per unit 5.00 8.00 11.00
hours required per unit 6 minutes 10 minutes 15 minutes
CM per hour 50.00 46.00 44.00
Ranking first second third
Market limit 800 units 800 units 800 units
Units to be produced/best comb. 800 units 720 units -
hours used 80 hours 120 hours none
4.33
a shut down costs
Reduced fixed costs P30,000 x 4 months 120,000.00
additional cost during shut down period 25,000.00
Restarting costs 20,000.00
165,000.00
4.34
a shut down costs
Reduced fixed costs 60% x P200,000 x 6 months 720,000.00
additional cost during shut down period 100,000.00
Restarting costs 50,000.00
870,000.00
4.35
Incremental selling price if to accept the order (15,000 x P11) 165,000.00
Incremental variable costs:
Variable manufacturing costs at P9 per unit (15,000 x P9) 135,000.00
Additional packaging and shipping costs 3,800.00
Total 138,800.00
Net incremental profit from the special order 26,200.00
4.36
Product 1 Product 2 Product 3
CM per unit 5.00 8.00 11.00
Hours required per unit ( in minutes) 6 10 15
Units produced per hour (60 min. / time required) 10 6 4
CM per hour 50.00 48.00 44.00
Ranking 1st 2nd 3rd
4.37
Total cost to make the part:
Materials 1.50
Direct labor 2.00
Variable overhead 0.50
4.00
Total cost to buy 5.00
Net advantage to make on a per unit basis (1.00)
DECISION: Make the part
4.38
Retailers Wholesalers
Number of customers called per week 60 35
Average order per customer, at their respective prices 180 400
4.39
1 Sales 10,000 x 12 x P12 1,440,000.00
Less, Expenses:
Direct materials 3.90
Direct labor 0.60
Overhead 1.70
Selling 4.10
total units of 10,000 x 12 x P10.30 10.30 1,236,000.00
Operating income or 10,000 x 12 x (12-10.30) 204,000.00
4.40
1 Cost saved by purchasing boxes of tubes:
Material, 20% x P3.00 0.60
Labor, 10% x P3.50 0.35
Overhead, 10% x P.50 * 0.05
Total cost to make 1.00
total cost to buy 1.05
* Total overhead P1.50 per box, allocated overhead P1.00 per box (100,000 / 100,000)
Variable overhead P.50 per box.
The company should make the tubes.
2 The company would not pay more than P1.00 each because that is the cost to make the
product internally.
Making the tubes saves variable costs of P.05 per box. If sales exceed P10,000 / P.05 = 200,000
at 200,000 boxes, it is cheaper to make the tubes.
4 The company needs 125,000 boxes. The cost to buy 125,000 boxes is P131,250. The cost to make
100,000 and buy 25,000 is:
Cost ot make 100,000 boxes at P1.00 100,000.00
Cost of buying 25,000 boxes at P1.05 26,250.00
Total 126,250.00
Therefore, the company should the latter action, which saves P5,000
5 There are many nonquantifiable factors, such as: Quality of the tubes, reliability of delivery to meet
production schedules; the financial stability of the supplier; development of an alternate source of
supply; alternate uses of tube manufacturing capacity; long-run character and size of the market.
4.41
1 Total profit expected
volume Profit per unit total profit
Back bag 8,000 50.00 400,000.00
Body bag 3,000 120.00 360,000.00
School bag 4,000 60.00 240,000.00
1,000,000.00
4.42
5 As per total there will be an incremental income of P40 if the only option is to sell all as is
or to process further all products; therefore, process all.
b Assume that only 45 maximum hours are available to produce the most profitable product:
Hours available 45
Units produced ( 8 units per hour) 360
Total CM from sale of Product Z at P2.00 per unit 720.00
Total DCM lost from not producing Product X (P200 - P80) (120.00)
Total CM from Product Z 600.00
Present Total CM from Product Z 400.00
Net incremental CM from the decision to produce only Product Z 200.00
4.43 The P8 million is already gone. It is irrelevant for decision purposes. The relevant comparison is
whether to invest P4 million in the division or to invest it elsewhere.
sell division hold the division
Investment required P4 million P4 million
Income generated ? P500,000 yearly*
* this assumes that the division has truly "turned around" and will now make a net profit of P500,000
per year for the foreseeable future. The P4 million is relevant because Elgin is forgoing the opportunity
to invest it elsewhere for some return. If projects of comparable risk can be expected to generate
more than P500,000 yearly, the division should be sold.
4.44
Without With
1 discount discount
Revenues, 75 at P.12 9.00
Revenues:
72 at P.12 8.64
6 at P.072 0.43
9.00 9.07
Note that a minor (4%) gain in passengers will be beneficial. Note, too, that airlines have negligible
variable costs of adding a few passengers in otherwise empty seat.
2 Let X = number of passengers who switch
Revenue with discount = Revenue without discount
50(.60)(P.12) = X(P.12)
P3.60 = P.12X
X = P3.60 / P.12 = 30 passengers
To Check: Without With
discount discount
Revenues, 75 at P.12 9.00
Revenues:
(75 - 30) at P.12 5.40
50 at P.072 3.60
9.00 9.00
Therefore, if at least 21 of the 50 discount passengers are "new", that is, they would not have flown
without the discount, there is more revenue with the discount plan.