21, Rue D'artois, F-75008 PARIS: CIGRE 2006
21, Rue D'artois, F-75008 PARIS: CIGRE 2006
21, Rue D'artois, F-75008 PARIS: CIGRE 2006
http : //www.cigre.org
SUMMARY
The paper illustrates the strategies and techniques adopted in some cases in Italy to overcome, by the
utilization of HV XLPE cable (unshielded or shielded), the difficulties arising whenever an existing or
planned HV or EHV line crosses densely populated areas under heavy restrictions on the magnetic
field. In particular, the paper initially reviews the possible methods to reduce the magnetic field
produced by underground cable lines, considering both the solutions based on acting on the laying
parameters (interaxial distance among the phases; laying depth; laying geometry, etc.) and those based
on the adoption of special apparatuses external to the cable, such as grids of insulated conductors
(passive or active shielding), and shields made of metallic materials. With regard to these latter
solutions, in addition to the analysis of their shielding efficiency, the possible technical problems
linked to losses, thermal properties etc. are also discussed. Particular attention is then paid to new
developments in the use of ferromagnetic shields and to the description of the main features of the
most significant installations.
Authors’ experience shows, in particular, that the choice of the best mitigation strategy depends, first
of all, on whether the intervention must be carried out on an existing cable system already in operation
or on a new link still to be laid down. Indeed, in the first case it is essential to operate avoiding any
risk of damaging the cables and possibly keeping the excavation works to a minimum in order to limit
the impact of the works on the daily life of the citizens.
Secondly, the method to be adopted should be chosen on the basis of a careful cost-benefit analysis in
order to properly balance the shielding efficiency needed to achieve the required field reduction and
the cost, feasibility and reliability of the available technologies.
In the light of such considerations, the application of shields of open shape and made of high
conductivity materials can be considered the most convenient solution for interventions on existing
cables already in operation. By contrast, for new installations, laying the cables in a trefoil
arrangement, instead of the conventional flat configuration, represents the technical option that may
conveniently solve many practical situations. However, in case it would be necessary to obtain a very
drastic reduction of the magnetic field, the best solution seems to be that of enclosing the cables inside
a close shield made of ferromagnetic material.
KEYWORDS
Cables, Magnetic fields, Power distribution, Power transmission, Shielding.