Aston Martin: A Product Overview
Aston Martin: A Product Overview
Aston Martin: A Product Overview
A PRODUCT OVERVIEW
PART l
David Brown
and
Feltham Foundations
Bibliography
With thanks to
www.astonmartin.com
I have been working in the world of Aston Martin for the past 25 years. I
came upon the marque in my general course of business in the motor trade
and have become as enthusiastic as my customers about Aston Martin and
their products.
There is an aura about Aston Martin, a heritage far beyond simple statistics.
Winning at Le Mans, victory in the World Sportscar Championship, the
Zagatos and Royal patronage would be enough for any car manufacturer.
Aston Martin goes beyond that – every car has its character and every
owner, real pride in his or her car.
Any market place has pitfalls for the unwary and opportunities for the
unscrupulous. What I have tried to produce is an overview of Aston Martin
cars that can act as an introduction to the marque. It is my view, coloured
by my experiences and the use of my library of Aston Martin books as a
reference. Most of the Aston Martin photos are from my own archive and
I have been fortunate enough to enjoy handling each of these glorious cars.
This may represent your first foray into the world of Aston Martin; it may
supplement your own knowledge. Whatever your point of reference, I
hope this overview adds to your enjoyment.
Philip Jones
Byron International
Prologue
The Lagonda badge had a renaissance in the 1970’s with the 4 door V8 and then the
glamour of the William Towns’ V8. I have had the pleasure in becoming involved with
both ends of the Lagonda story – the great pre-war cars as well as the later cars. Here
is just a taste of some of those wonderful cars that helped in my understanding of the
passion for both marques.
Sutherland and Hill had built a prototype chassis and body in 1939, which became know as the
“Atom” saloon. Although not announced until 1946, by the end of 1944, the 2.0 litre, 4-cylinder
engine, designed by Claude Hill, was fitted in the wartime prototype “Atom”. In the winter of
1946, prior to buying the company, David Brown, visited the Aston Martin factory, then located
in Feltham, Middlesex. Driving the Atom may have influenced his decision, as he thought the
handling was superb, although the engine a little gutless. Thus arrived a most compelling era in
the history of Aston Martin. In his stewardship for nearly quarter of a century, the company
produced fine road and racing machines that would propel the Aston Martin marque into the
province of the all-time greats.
Announced in 1948 at the London Motors Show, Earls Court, the TWO-LITRE SPORTS did not
become known as the DB1 until after the DB2 had been introduced. In production from
September 1948 to May 1950, only 15 were built. Whilst the “Atom” in appearance is an
acquired taste, the chassis designed by Hill has since been considered to have set new standards
and been one of the best in the world at the time. However, David Brown envisaged the new
car as an open sports car, not a saloon. Without a roof, Hill, sought to strengthen the structure
by duplicating the main longitudinal members. The chassis was built out of square or rectangular
section steel tubes, 13 gauge for lower members, and 18 gauge for the superstructure. A
bulkhead was arranged in the scuttle position to act as a main cross member and the
superstructure was made wide enough for three abreast seating. The body panels were carried
on out-riggers. With a 9’ wheelbase, its rigid frame set new standards in road holding. The
suspension was considered a complete break through from the normal pre-war practice. The
trailing-link independent front suspension was an improved version of that fitted to the Atom
saloon. The 7” links were pivoted on substantial needle roller and ball bearings mounted in a
light alloy tubular chassis cross-member filled with oil. This was to lubricate the Marles steering
box’s bell crank and the suspension bearings. An anti roll bar was fitted, and coil springs that
locate at the top on a cast alloy upright. Lever arm hydraulic dampers from Armstrong, formed
an upper arm to the suspension parallelogram. With some similarities, for the rear suspension,
coil springs and an anti-roll bar were fitted in conjunction with trailing radius arms and a Panhard
rod to locate the live rear axle. Hill preferred coil springs as they are neater and needed less
maintenance than leaf springs. Also, coil springs countered brake reaction better. Armstrong
lever arm shock absorbers were fitted and for ultimate handling, hub level roll centres were
arranged at the rear and ground level at the front. Girling hydraulic twelve inch drum brakes
with a two leading shoe pattern are fitted.
Following discussions early in 1948 with the Receiver acting for the Lagonda Motor Co., David
Brown, purchased the goodwill, current assets, plant and the Lagonda name, for £52,500. David
Brown had already decided that the six cylinder engine designed by Claude Hill would prove to
expensive to produce from scratch and recognised the 100bhp on offer from the Lagonda cast
iron 2580cc six-cylinder units better satisfied his performance criteria and well suited David
Browns ambition ‘to make the worlds best sporting Grand Tourer’. The DB2 was on its way
and the 2-litre sports became better known as the DB1.
THE ASTON MARTIN DB2
The reception for the car was amazing on both sides of the Atlantic with demand extraordinarily
strong. Performance had been the foundation of its development and, whilst rationed fuel
quality at the time meant a low compression ration of 6.5:1 on the standard car, a Vantage
engine option was quickly introduced with a compression ratio of 8.2:1 and delivering 125 bhp.
This focus on performance was mirrored in racing development with the appointment of John
Wyer as team manager, heralding another three car entry to Le Mans. In spite of public demand
for the DB2, three cars were taken off the production line and prepared for the 24 hour
challenge. One of the entries was unfortunately involved in a traffic accident en route to Le
Sarthe but its absence was made up for by VMF 64 and VMF 63 achieving 5th and 6th overall and
1st and 2nd in class respectively. The team competed successfully at Silverstone, Dundrod, in the
Mille Miglia and the Alpine Rally. However, whilst the team’s success continued with VMF 64
getting third overall in the 1951 Le Mans race, David Brown recognised that outright victory
would require something more than just taking cars from the production line. He recruited
Robert Eberan-Eberhorst, a former Auto Union designer to focus on a pure racer – a project
that realised the DB 3.
Road car development on the DB2 continued with the announcement, in late 1950, of a
Drophead. The first example inevitably went to David Brown and at least a further 101 were
built with five sold as just chassis that were bodied elsewhere – three of those Dropheads by
Graber.
A contemporary road test would enthuse current owners or potential investors alike – John
Bolster wrote for Autosport: “This should still be a young car when its contemporaries are
senile and decrepit.” He continued “This is an expensive car, and one would not expect it to be
otherwise. Nevertheless, having regard to current prices, I consider that for sheer intrinsic
value, this is one of the cheapest cars on the market.”
Aston Martin DB2
Chassis No: LML/50/X1
© BYRON INTERNATIONAL
The car was launched in both saloon and drophead form and whilst the drophead missed out on
the hatchback, it shared other design changes with the saloon. A new one-piece windscreen
changed the view from the inside and outside of the car while new bumpers with over riders
protected the bodywork. Safety was also the rationale behind the newly raised headlamps. At
launch, power came from the 2.6 litre twin overhead camshaft engine of the DB2 “Vantage”
tune delivering 125 bhp an additional 50 kilos in the weight negating any potential performance
advantage over the DB2 it replaced. In mid 1954, this engine was uprated to a 2.9 litre
(2922cc) format offering a power output of 140 bhp and a top speed of 120 mph. With Robert
Eberan-Eberhorst designing the DB3, the Race Team was not interested in the DB2/4 for circuit
racing but the Works Racing Department were commissioned to prepare 3 privately owned
examples for the 1955 Monte Carlo Rally. Fitment of the newly developed DB 3 cylinder heads
delivered an uprated 170 bhp and the honour of the marque was upheld when 3rd, 4th and 7th
place finishes delivered the Team Prize to Aston Martin.
Records show that at least 73 Dropheads were built in a two-year production run that saw
developments in vehicle production as well as changes in design. Chassis and engine production
was based in Yorkshire while body production moved to Mulliners in Birmingham. As a result,
Feltham moved to become a point of final assembly as well as the focus of some of the industrial
disputes. Whilst not proven, it is thought that one consequence of these new arrangements was
an early glitch in production leading to there being more engine/chassis than bodies – a number
of these were supplied as rolling chassis to other coachbuilders delivering some masterpieces of
automotive art. In 1954, Stanley Harold “Wacky” Arnolt, an American industrialist
commissioned Italian coachbuilder Bertone to produce a Spyder on a DB2/4 chassis. A total of
8 rolling chassis were delivered to Bertone who produced dropheads, fixed head coupes and
Spyders. Some of these wonderful developments of the Aston Martin DB2/4 survive today,
others, like chassis 810 a specially commissioned Disco Volante, based on the Alfa Romeo of the
same name, have been “lost”, something that will always enliven a market place with debates
over the provenance of “finds”.
Aston Martin now progressed in two ways – the Works Racing Department had advanced with
the DB3 concurrent with the development of the DB2 and the DB2/4 that Robert Eberan-
Eberhorst development continued with the DB2/4 Mark II.
THE ASTON MARTIN DB3
Developed for competition, only 10 cars produced in total, of which only 8
survive
The chassis moved away from the square and rectangular tubes of the DB2 chassis and used
round tubing in chromium molybdenum steel. Created in ladder form, it gained beam strength
from the tubes themselves rather than having to use vertical girders. The wheelbase was six
inches (15cm) shorter than the DB2 but shared with its predecessor a pair of trailing arms for
the front suspension. It differs in choice of torsion bars as the springing medium rather than coil
springs, these were placed in the front tubular chassis member. Torsion bars were again the
spring medium of the rear suspension although the design for the rear was totally new in using
the De Dion principle with the final drive mounted on the chassis and part of the sprung weight.
With the wheel hubs welded to an axle beam to keep them parallel, axle control is by trailing
arms with a Panhard road for lateral location. The lower trailing arms were arranged to twist
with relative movement of the De Dion tube, thus delivering roll resistance. Steering
improvements came from the introduction of rack and pinion steering with the steering column
having a universal joint at the pinion end. The brake drums were light alloy with steel liners –
the rear drums being mounted inboard – and the braking was further enhanced with a split
system with separate master cylinders for front and rear and a simple adjustment for bias.
The body was a light structure using 18 gauge alloy panels that did not contribute to the overall
strength of the car. It was designed to be lifted off the chassis quickly – in about 20 minutes –
and for ease of access came away with the scuttle and wiring harness. The design called for a
clean airflow under the bonnet so the structure of the body is two part – an underpan as one
unit with the exhaust exiting under the driver’s door in a recess within the underpan. The body
then attached to the underpan using just 10 bolts.
The engine was the Vantage engine from the DB2 but with the twin SU carburettors replaced
with triple dual choke Webers increasing the power output to 140 bhp. An oil cooler was
added to the radiator and the sump redesigned by Elektron. With a 32 gallon fuel tank mounted
on the chassis, its stated weight in race trim was 18 cwt (914Kg) delivering a bhp per tonne
figure of 152, well above the 104 of the DB2. The DB3 made its debut in the Tourist Trophy in
September 1951 alongside two DB2’s but 1952 saw a better start with motorcycle ace, Geoff
Duke, coming third in his car racing debut at the BARC meeting at Goodwood in DB3/1. Of
four cars entered in the BRDC meeting at Silverstone and three came in second to fourth
behind Stirling Moss in a C type and that was enough for Aston Martin to claim the team prize.
After less successful outings at the Monaco Grand Prix and Le Mans, the season finished on a
high with victory at the Goodwood 9 hours in August.
Only belatedly did Aston Martin turn its attention to selling the car and in June of that year the
first adverts appeared in the motoring press. It announced that 25 units would be produced
although in the event, only ten were produced and only 5 of these found their way to private
buyers. The prices quoted at the time for the car were £3,700 inclusive of taxes compared with
£2,728 and £2,879 for the DB2 salon and drophead respectively. During the winter of 1952/53,
development and testing continued with the car setting a new outright sports car lap record at
Monza,. Nevertheless, Team Manager, Wyer, was disappointed to note that the dry weight of
the car with the 2.9 litre engine was now only 45 kg lighter than the previous year’s lightweight
DB2 and he was therefore receptive to suggestions of a redesign – a redesign that brought
about the DB3S
THE ASTON MARTIN DB3S
The final drive changed from a hypoid to a spiral bevel to stop an overheating problem and
improve the speed of ratio changes. Improvements to the 2.9 litre engine included new cam
shafts and inlet valves which accounted for a rise in power output of 22 bhp while brakes are
uprated and the balance adjustment is replaced by Girling automatic adjusters. The steering
gained another universal joint. The most instantly recognisable change for the DB3S over its
predecessor was the bodywork. Again the work of Frank Feeley, it was memorably elegant with
the cutaway behind the wheels. Far from being a styling whim, this was a significant
development in the car. With the DB3, there had been problems getting rid of the hot air from
the radiators and vents had been cut in the bodywork. Wind tunnel work at Vickers had
delivered the solution that was both effective and visually stunning. The development timetable
for the DB3S was such that the Aston Martin Race team had to start the 1953 season with the
old DB3.
The early season saw disappointments that continued on to the DB3S debut at Le Mans,
however, from those early disappointments, fortune smiled and the DB3S won every remaining
race that it was entered for in 1953. The British Empire Trophy on the Isle of Man, the BRDC
meeting at Silverstone, the Goodwood 9 hours and finally the Tourist Trophy at Dundrod. At
that year’s Motor Show in London, the DB3S took pride of place, although with no price tag and
that reflected the pressure on Wyer’s department which was responsible for all production
development and were heavily involved in the development of the new Lagonda V12. The
results suffered throughout 1954 – after a bad start at Argentina, a third place finish did not
compensate for one entry involved in a fatal crash and another retirement. Both cars entered
into the Mille Miglia crashed.
In May 1956, Aston Martin announced a new body style, a fixed head coupe with a fastback tail –
said to be initially laid down by David Brown himself, it had a detachable roof panel that fitted in
the luggage space behind the seats. It was the end of the line for the DB3S – racing continued in
1956 but development was focussed on the future and the DBR1, a race car that would never
be offered to the public.
THE ASTON MARTIN DB2/4 Mark II
On the show stand at launch, joining the saloon and drophead models was a fixed head coupe –
the product of a special brief to Mulliners, the fixed head was designed to reflect the shape of
the drop head’s hood and was finished in a contrasting colour to the main body. Early in 1956,
Aston Martin began an association with a new Italian coachbuilder that would have long term
design impact on the marque. Initially Touring built a limited run of three Spyder designs using
the company’s patented “Superleggera” system of lightweight support for alloy body panels.
Originally intended as export market products, the three Spyders were used extensively in
marketing activities – at the Paris and London Motor Shows and even as a competition prize in
the Daily Mail. The Suez crisis at this time and its impact of petrol rationing undoubtedly had a
significant impact of sales – only 199 were sold in the two years of its life. While the car was
losing ground in performance to some of its rivals, John Bolster summarised his test for
Autosport by calling the DB2/4 Mark II “ a very sporting car that you can drive in a dinner
jacket.” Then in 1957 Aston Martin announced a price cut on the DB2/4 Mark II – at the time,
they stated that the right hand drive sales had been adversely affected by the petrol crisis and
this was an effort to bring sales in line with left hand drive models. Perhaps it was solid decision
making by John Wyer, formerly the Race Manager and now General Manager of the Automotive
Division, perhaps it was to clear the decks for the launch of the DB Mark III that was launched
at Geneva and in the United States in March of that year.
THE ASTON MARTIN DB Mark III
The power impact on these changes was the production of 162 bhp at 5500 rpm while adding
twin exhausts pushed this up further to 178 bhp. To counter this performance increase, Alfin
rear drums were supplemented by front disc brakes, (an option on the first 100 cars). A
sporting orientation came with a key styling change, the introduction of the radiator grille of the
DB3S – destined to influence the look of Aston Martins for many years to come. The chrome
strip above the windscreen disappeared, the bonnet lowered to accommodate the new grille
and opening rear quarter lights aided ventilation.
The famous “refrigerator” door handles that had been in place sine the DB2 were replaced and,
as another pointer to the future, the instrument panel changed with the dials clustered around
the steering column. By the time the car was launched in London, the pricing turned out to be
exactly that of the pre-price drop DB2/4 Mark II’s, the disc brakes had become a standard
fitment and the option of a Laycock overdrive unit was introduced.
This optional extra proved to be heaven sent for the sales department. Bolting onto the back of
the gearbox and only operating in top gear, this option helped Aston Martin sell their entire
1958 allocation of stock by the end of the Show. During 1958 further engine modifications
were derived from the ongoing race programme in addition to the standard DBA engine with its
optional twin exhausts, the new DBB series was announced with triple Weber carburettors and
a higher compression ratio and modified camshafts. In conjunction with the twin exhausts that
were standard on the DBB, the option added just £70 to the cost of the car and increased the
power to 195 bhp. However, only round 10 cars had the DBB engine and another
configuration, the DBD with SU carburettors with 180 bhp was fitted to a total of 47 cars.
Late in 1958, the Aston Martin DB4 was announced and the public focus began to swing away
from the DB Mark III but not before more modifications could be added. First came a Baldwin
hydraulic booster in the braking system to counter a long term media criticism of pedal
pressures for braking.
Then early in 1959 came an introduction that perhaps signalled a major change in the market
place as the new Borg Warner automatic transmission marked a final transition of the DB2 from
a circuit bred racer to a luxury express and, notwithstanding the public awareness of the
forthcoming DB4, production continued to July 1959. That production reflected a demand that
continued because of the car’s competitiveness in the market place. In a road test, Roy
Salvadori concluded that “the gradual elimination of small faults over the years has resulted in a
sports car that fulfils its purpose to perfection. This had been reflected in sales of the Mark III,
which totalled 551 units from launch.
1959Aston Martin DB2/4 Drophead Mk lll
Chassis No: AM300/3/1808
© BYRON INTERNATIONAL
1958 Aston Martin DB2/4 Mk lll
Chassis No: AM300/3/1769
© BYRON INTERNATIONAL