Plato Paper
Plato Paper
Plato Paper
PH104 - Group 9
Plato’s dialogues are full of questers for excellence. Seeing their eagerness such as those
of the disciples of the sophists, Socrates cannot help but ask the more fundamental
question: what is excellence in the first place? Socrates does not imply in this question
that people do not search excellence since he believes they already do so without the
need of his urging. He is simply asking them to ‘take care’ because in their relentless
pursuit, the ambitious may not be careful enough to discriminate what is real excellence
from what is not. In the name of excellence, they may obsess with the pursuit of it, and
forget altogether the question of what excellence really is in the first place. This is what
There are many answers to the question of what excellence consists of. In Plato’s time,
cardinal virtues such courage and self-restraint are what consists ‘arete’, Meno answered
that excellence consists of ‘acquiring gold and silver’ or ‘ruling others’. These answers
can almost be expected back then since these questers were not after spending their
lives doing altruistic work but rather on desiring to live well. But according to Socrates,
caring for one’s state of soul is more important in the quest for excellence than ambition
and wealth. Socrates thinks that knowledge and wisdom provide everything one needs to
live well and he shows this because he thinks that all external things such as wealth, or
even virtues such as courage, can only be considered ‘good’ in the first place if one has
SORIA, Kent Emmanuel || TAN, Candice || TRANGIA, Mark Jerome
PH104 - Group 9
wisdom. One must be able to use them properly or they cannot be considered good.
But the question arises whether wisdom alone is sufficient for happiness even in the
absence of external goods. Stoicism, which flourished during hard times, affirmed this
idea greatly. One must remember that the question of what real excellence is was
addressed by Socrates to those who agreed that ‘arete’ meant enjoying privileges such
as good health. In Plato’s Republic, there is the example of Glaucon, the good person
who nevertheless experienced great suffering. This launched the question on whether the
‘person on the rack’ can thus be happy. In Apology, Socrates demonstrates that wisdom
secures people from ill fortune. Since they are inter-connected, possessing wisdom
inherently implied possessing external goods too. In Republic, Socrates says the just
person on the rack is better than the unjust rich person though he does not claim that all
just persons are happy even without external goods. Similar readings of other works of
Plato prove to be inconclusive in answering the question by just analyzing Plato’s writings.
Since this question is left as a philosophical debate for future generations, we as a group
agree with Plato that wisdom is necessary for other virtues and external goods to be
considered as ‘good’ or ‘beneficial’ in the first place. However, we also feel that since
wisdom is the necessary condition for external goods such as comfort to be beneficial,
once we have wisdom, external goods such as health can then become factors that
be happy ‘living on a rack’, but it may be very hard to do so for most people.