0% found this document useful (0 votes)
222 views1 page

People V Lucero

The Supreme Court of the Philippines reviewed the conviction and damages awarded for the 1998 murder of a barangay kagawad by Rodriguez Lucero using a bolo. While affirming the conviction, the Court modified some of the damages awarded. It increased the civil indemnity from P50,000 to P75,000 and the exemplary damages from P25,000 to P30,000 in line with prevailing jurisprudence. It also replaced the P3,000 awarded for actual damages with P25,000 in temperate damages since all funeral expenses were not proven.

Uploaded by

AB
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
222 views1 page

People V Lucero

The Supreme Court of the Philippines reviewed the conviction and damages awarded for the 1998 murder of a barangay kagawad by Rodriguez Lucero using a bolo. While affirming the conviction, the Court modified some of the damages awarded. It increased the civil indemnity from P50,000 to P75,000 and the exemplary damages from P25,000 to P30,000 in line with prevailing jurisprudence. It also replaced the P3,000 awarded for actual damages with P25,000 in temperate damages since all funeral expenses were not proven.

Uploaded by

AB
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

PEOPLE v LUCERO

Del Castillo, J.
G.R. No. 179044. – December 6, 2010
FACTS
● Oct. 20, 1998: An Information was filed charging Lucero with the crime of murder
 Using a bolo, he hacked at the head of Aydaon, a Barangay Kagawad
 The resulting wound and injury caused the victim’s instantaneous death
● July 19, 2002: RTC found Lucero guilty of murder
 Ordered Lucero to pay the heirs of the victim the sum of P50,000.00 as civil indemnity and P10,000.00 as
exemplary damages
● Nov. 29, 2006: CA affirmed RTC ruling with modification
 Ordered Lucero to pay the heirs of the victim P50,000.00 as civil indemnity, P25,000.00 as exemplary
damages, P3,000.00 as actual damages and P50,000.00 as moral damages
ISSUES/HELD/RATIO:
1. W/N the award of damages was proper – NO
CIVIL INDEMNITY
● Pursuant to prevailing jurisprudence, the award of P50,000.00 as civil indemnity must be increased to
P75,000.00
 In cases of murder and homicide, civil indemnity of PhP75,000.00 and moral damages of PhP50,000.00
are awarded automatically
 Indeed, such awards are mandatory without need of allegation and proof other than the death of the
victim, owing to the fact of the commission of murder or homicide
EXEMPLARY DAMAGES
● Pursuant to prevailing jurisprudence, the award of PP25,000.00 as exemplary damages is likewise increased to
P30,000.00.
ACTUAL DAMAGES
● Court found that the CA awarded P3k representing the amount spent for the embalming as shown by the receipt
 However, the prosecution also presented a list of expenses such as those spent for the coffin, etc, which
were not duly covered by receipt
● People v Gidoc: Under Article 2224 of the Civil Code, temperate damages may be recovered, as it cannot be
denied that the heirs of the victims suffered pecuniary loss although the exact amount was not proved
 The award of P25,000.00 as temperate damages in murder cases is proper when no evidence of burial
and funeral expenses is presented in the trial court
● On the basis of this authority, the Court deleted the award of P3k as actual damages, and in lieu thereof, it
awarded to the heirs of the victim the amount of 25k as temperate damages
DISPOSITIVE PORTION
WHEREFORE, the appeal is DENIED. The November 29, 2006 Decision of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. CR-HC No.
00340 which affirmed with modifications the July 19, 2002 Decision of the Regional Trial Court of Bislig City, Surigao del
Sur, Branch 29, finding appellant Rodriguez Lucero y Paw-as guilty beyond reasonable doubt of the crime of murder, is
AFFIRMED with MODIFICATIONS that the awards of civil indemnity is increased to P75,000.00, exemplary damages is
increased to P30,000.00; the award of P3,000.00 as actual damages is deleted and in lieu thereof, appellant is ordered to
pay the heirs of the victim the amount of P25,000.00 as temperate damages.

You might also like