Striving For Divine Union
Striving For Divine Union
Striving For Divine Union
Yet, despite these obvious flaws, the book does serve a valuable purpose,
providing us with fascinating glimpses into the little-known world of small
village-level communities that are generally ignored in ‘standard’ works on
Hindu-Muslim relations in India.
Yoginder Sikand
Bangalore, India
BookMuslim
Book
The
October
4
95 Review
Reviews
World Volume 95 October 2005
2005
611
T M W • V 95 • O 2005
One can classify the Sufi position on worldly affairs into two categories:
khalwah and jalwah. The former is defined as secluding oneself from the
world, whereas the latter is defined as active socialization with people and
participation in the various affairs of society. It is clear that Suhrawardi and his
followers preferred practicing the latter, without minimizing the importance of
worship and meditation in Islamic spirituality.
By focusing on Suhrawardi’s training in the traditional religious sciences,
the author prepares the reader for an analysis of his order’s process of
institutionalization and attitude toward politics. The author investigates the
Suhrawardi order within two regions. In the first chapter, he examines the
genesis of the Suhrawardi order in Baghdad and the founder’s relationship
with the ‘Abbasid Caliph al-Nasir (1180–1225); in the fourth chapter he
investigates its expansion to the Indian subcontinent, in particular in Ucch and
Multan. In the same chapter, the author speaks of the second important Shaykh
of this order, Shaykh Baha’ al-din Zakariyya (d. 1262).
In the first chapter, the author expounds Suhrawardi’s concept of political
obedience. “He defined the caliph as the ‘representative’ or ‘vicegerent’
(khalifa) of God on earth. According to him, humanity is incapable of
returning to God on its own without a temporal overseer. For this reason, God
chose a mediator, wasila, between Himself and human beings. It is the caliph
who is the representative of God and has the ultimate responsibility to bring
human beings from a corrupt way of living and back to Him” (p. 17). The
notion of obedience to the caliph was inherited by Suhrawardi’s successors
and became a fundamental component of the order. One can observe the
consequences of this concept in the Suhrawardi shayks’ close relations with
the rulers of their ages.
The book includes several examples of collaboration between the state
and Sufi orders. This alliance served the mutual interests of both sides. For
example, Caliph al-Nasir attempted to solidify his authority throughout society
by ensuring his control of Sufi and futuwwa groups. Once he attained Shaykh
Suhrawardi’s support, he was able to strengthen his authority on all levels.
Moreover, al-Nasir dispatched Suhrawardi as his representative to the Minor
Saljuk Empire in order to negotiate and settle the conflict that existed between
the two. In exchange for this open support, the Caliph established a large
khanaqah (Sufi lodge) in Baghdad and granted many endowments to Shaykh
Suhrawardi and his followers.
Following in his predecessor’s footsteps, Shaykh Baha’ al-din Zakariyya
also established congenial relations with the Turkish Sultan Iltutmish in Multan.
Thanks to the Turkish dynasty, the Suhrawardi order easily took root in the
Indian subcontinent. Nevertheless, the order did have to undergo some
modification so that it was able to orient itself to an environment and a people
612
B R
613
T M W • V 95 • O 2005
of which shows, for ‘Attar, the very close relationship between the Prophet and
the divine. Attar stated that he knew when ‘The radiance of the light of
manifestation became evident, the mim of Ahmad became invisible, that is
only God the One remained’.” (p. 93). This quotation shows clearly that the
Suhrawardi order shares common characteristics of the Prophet concept with
other Sufi orders.
Although the author has done a commendable scholarly job in writing this
book, he does occasionally takes partisan positions. The book now and then
assumes the character of an apology written by a disciple in defense of his
Shaykh. For instance, Huda accuses some personalities of being “shari“a
minded” just because they criticized Shaykh Suhrawardi or the Suhrawardi
order for a variety of reasons. In my opinion, these statements contradict the
general objective of the book, which is to prove that tasawwuf is based on the
Qur’an and the hadiths and thus is not alien from shari“ah. However, this by
no means diminishes the value of this important work.
Tahir Uluç
Fellow of Turkish Academy of Science
Selçuk University, Theology School
Turkey
614