Striving For Divine Union

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

B R

Yet, despite these obvious flaws, the book does serve a valuable purpose,
providing us with fascinating glimpses into the little-known world of small
village-level communities that are generally ignored in ‘standard’ works on
Hindu-Muslim relations in India.

Yoginder Sikand
Bangalore, India
BookMuslim
Book
The
October
4
95 Review
Reviews
World Volume 95 October 2005
2005

Striving for Divine Union: Spiritual


Exercises for Suhrawardi Sufis
By Qamar-ul Huda
London and New York: Routledge Curzon Taylor & Francis Group, 2003

This book is a spiritual and intellectual biography of thirteenth century


Sufi thinker Abu Hafs ‘Umar al-Suhrawardi (1145 –1236) (henceforth referred
to as Suhrawardi). Author Qamar-ul Huda argues that Sufism is an indivisible
part of traditional Islamic sciences and that the contemporary polarization
between ulama and Sufism did not exist in early Islam. Contemporary studies
in this field have more or less contributed to and promoted the idea that
tasawwuf is no more than “popular religion,” based mostly on superstition and
unorthodox religious notions. The author endeavors to dispel these
misunderstandings by reinforcing the notion that Sufi lifestyle and knowledge
have been, for the most part, derived from the Qur’an and the Prophet’s life,
which together make up the principles and rules that regulate both Muslim
individual and social life.
The author also aims to prove that Sufis possess a strong social
consciousness and do not, as often believed, merely withdraw from active
social life. This has been true throughout Islamic history, since Sufis have
contributed a great deal to human and ethical improvement. The author
maintains that numerous Sufi shaykhs have taken active roles in politics and
administration for the purpose of elevating the welfare of Muslim communities.
This argument is, for the most part, true, since Sufis have also contributed to
the improvement of academic and educational life of the Muslim world. To
support his thesis, the author presents many examples from Sufi literature and
focuses on the life and thought of Suhrawardi, famous author of the Sufi
classic, ‘Awarifu”l-Ma“arif.

611
T M W • V 95 • O 2005

One can classify the Sufi position on worldly affairs into two categories:
khalwah and jalwah. The former is defined as secluding oneself from the
world, whereas the latter is defined as active socialization with people and
participation in the various affairs of society. It is clear that Suhrawardi and his
followers preferred practicing the latter, without minimizing the importance of
worship and meditation in Islamic spirituality.
By focusing on Suhrawardi’s training in the traditional religious sciences,
the author prepares the reader for an analysis of his order’s process of
institutionalization and attitude toward politics. The author investigates the
Suhrawardi order within two regions. In the first chapter, he examines the
genesis of the Suhrawardi order in Baghdad and the founder’s relationship
with the ‘Abbasid Caliph al-Nasir (1180–1225); in the fourth chapter he
investigates its expansion to the Indian subcontinent, in particular in Ucch and
Multan. In the same chapter, the author speaks of the second important Shaykh
of this order, Shaykh Baha’ al-din Zakariyya (d. 1262).
In the first chapter, the author expounds Suhrawardi’s concept of political
obedience. “He defined the caliph as the ‘representative’ or ‘vicegerent’
(khalifa) of God on earth. According to him, humanity is incapable of
returning to God on its own without a temporal overseer. For this reason, God
chose a mediator, wasila, between Himself and human beings. It is the caliph
who is the representative of God and has the ultimate responsibility to bring
human beings from a corrupt way of living and back to Him” (p. 17). The
notion of obedience to the caliph was inherited by Suhrawardi’s successors
and became a fundamental component of the order. One can observe the
consequences of this concept in the Suhrawardi shayks’ close relations with
the rulers of their ages.
The book includes several examples of collaboration between the state
and Sufi orders. This alliance served the mutual interests of both sides. For
example, Caliph al-Nasir attempted to solidify his authority throughout society
by ensuring his control of Sufi and futuwwa groups. Once he attained Shaykh
Suhrawardi’s support, he was able to strengthen his authority on all levels.
Moreover, al-Nasir dispatched Suhrawardi as his representative to the Minor
Saljuk Empire in order to negotiate and settle the conflict that existed between
the two. In exchange for this open support, the Caliph established a large
khanaqah (Sufi lodge) in Baghdad and granted many endowments to Shaykh
Suhrawardi and his followers.
Following in his predecessor’s footsteps, Shaykh Baha’ al-din Zakariyya
also established congenial relations with the Turkish Sultan Iltutmish in Multan.
Thanks to the Turkish dynasty, the Suhrawardi order easily took root in the
Indian subcontinent. Nevertheless, the order did have to undergo some
modification so that it was able to orient itself to an environment and a people

612
B R

different from those in Baghdad; in the Indian subcontinent, there coexisted a


number of different religious groups. Another change to the order was that the
Persian language was replaced by Arabic in Sufi rituals and personal prayers.
Although the author discusses the ‘Abbasid caliphate in detail, he does not
fully elaborate its context in the Turkish dynasty. The author would have
served his readers well by discussing Turkish contributions to Islam in this
same time period.
It is important to analyze the consequences of the complex relationship
between the Suhrawardi order and the caliph in Baghdad and Sultan Iltutmish
in Multan. First of all, Shaykh Suhrawardi inspired a whole Sufi tradition that
encouraged Sufi orders to support the state for financial and economic gain.
This enabled rulers to intervene in affairs of the order to the extent that the
caliph appointed the postnishin position, i.e., supervision of khanaqah.
Furthermore, visitors or travelers were required to obtain permission from the
caliph to enter or reside in the khanaqah. Consequently, the Suhrawardi order
lost some esteem in the eyes of larger society.
Religiously, the celebrated Hanbalite theologian Ibn al-Jawzi (1126 –1200)
criticized Shaykh Suhrawardi’s teachings, which al-Jawzi felt were intended to
spread heresy in Islamic intellectual circles. Furthermore, the Chistiyyah order,
an influential Sufi brotherhood in Multan, objected to the practices of the
Suhrawardi order. In the first instance, it may be assumed that as a traditional
scholar, Ibn al-Jawzi was not pleased with the fact that the Caliph respected
Shaykh Suhrawardi more than he did traditional scholars and jurists. As for
objections of the Chishtiyya order, it should be noted that there has always
been some rivalry among the various Sufi orders; there are a myriad of
examples of these rivalries in hagiographic works.
In discussing rituals of the Suhrawardi order, the author focuses on adab,
the proper etiquette that regulates Suhrawardi Sufi’s daily life, including prayer,
fasting, the recitation of Qur’anic verses, vigil, and dhikr, remembrance of
God. When he discusses the concept of adab in the Suhrawardi order, Huda
often refers to Shaykh Suhrawardi’s famous book Awarifu”l-Ma“arif, which has
been widely adopted as a guidebook by members of various other Sufi orders
along with the Suhrawardis.
Adepts of the Suhrawardi order are devoted to keeping the sacred
identities alive within their inward lives. Moreover, they, like other Sufis,
attribute several symbolic meanings to the various names of Prophet
Muhammad. The author says, “One example of hadith al-qudsi and poetry is
when Farid al-din ‘Attar (d. 1220) alludes to a famous report with the name
Ahmad. The hadith al-qudsi states Ana Ahmad bila mim, ‘I am Ahmad
without the mim,’ that is Ahad, ‘One.’ ‘Attar repeats this verse several times to
illustrate that ‘Muhammad is One’ and ‘Ahmad is the messenger of Ahad,’ all

613
T M W • V 95 • O 2005

of which shows, for ‘Attar, the very close relationship between the Prophet and
the divine. Attar stated that he knew when ‘The radiance of the light of
manifestation became evident, the mim of Ahmad became invisible, that is
only God the One remained’.” (p. 93). This quotation shows clearly that the
Suhrawardi order shares common characteristics of the Prophet concept with
other Sufi orders.
Although the author has done a commendable scholarly job in writing this
book, he does occasionally takes partisan positions. The book now and then
assumes the character of an apology written by a disciple in defense of his
Shaykh. For instance, Huda accuses some personalities of being “shari“a
minded” just because they criticized Shaykh Suhrawardi or the Suhrawardi
order for a variety of reasons. In my opinion, these statements contradict the
general objective of the book, which is to prove that tasawwuf is based on the
Qur’an and the hadiths and thus is not alien from shari“ah. However, this by
no means diminishes the value of this important work.

Tahir Uluç
Fellow of Turkish Academy of Science
Selçuk University, Theology School
Turkey

614

You might also like