Becoming-Human Part 2 Summary
Becoming-Human Part 2 Summary
Becoming-Human Part 2 Summary
One of the main players in the human evolutionary drama was Homo erectus - the focus of Part 2 This
segment also discusses, albeit briefly, a fossil hominid species called Homo floresiensis.
Homo erectus = slightly smaller brain slightly bigger jaw, but it's basically us at almost 2 mya.
first hominids to leave Africa: the first fire makers, the first hunters.
Capable of analyzing possible uses of tools and coming up with a technological solutions
Great Rift Valley, East Africa. For millions of years, this massive geological fault line running the length of
East Africa = a stage on which human evolution played out. It all started with the first apes to walk upright
on two legs, about 6,000,000 years ago. There were many different types, all variations on the same
theme: ape-like creatures with small brains. The fossil known as Lucy is the most famous example. just
three-foot, eight-inches tall, with a brain the size of a chimp's.
For millions of years, creatures like her roamed forests and grasslands of Africa. But then something
changed. About 2 mya, new creatures (early Homo) appeared with abilities never seen before. The
transition to Homo = one of most important transformations that occurred in human evolution. Arms got
thinner, legs got longer, brains got bigger. Was a huge evolutionary step from ape bodies to bodies like
ours.
Lake Turkana, Northern Kenya / 1984 = male Homo erectus skull, spine, ribs, arms and leg
five-feet, three-inches tall with a build close to ours
Nick-named Turkana Boy.
Skull ia bit more primitive than modern, lower forehead, much smaller brain capacity (about 800 –
1000 cubic centimeters vs .1350 for moderns).
Hips a little wider, arms a little longer, body shape just like ours. Had a more forward position of
the palms when they ran
5’3” tall
How old was he?
Growth plates on limbs unfused = know he's still growing.
Based on dental enamel, guess his age at 8 years old.
To be 8 and 5’3” implies that growth of Turkana Boy faster than moderns but slower than apes
As humans evolved from apes, childhood extended. But what advantage could be gained by having
helpless children around to feed and care for, who take so long to grow up?
The mystery of prolonged childhood is at the heart of human evolution. It may be related to brain size.
We humans have the biggest brains in the animal kingdom in relation to our body size. They are so big
that most of our brain growth has to happen outside the womb or our heads would never get through the
birth canal.
A long, slow childhood gives brains time to grow after birth, time to learn everything we need to function
in our complex societies. That's the advantage of prolonged childhood. What about Turkana Boy? His
brain = 900 cubic centimeters, smaller than ours but more than twice as large a chimp's. So was he on
the way to thinking and talking like us?
Turkana Boy’s endocast = Broca's area = involved with memory functions, executive functions, AND
very important role in motor aspects of speech. Broca's caps regions on Turkana Boy = fully modern in
terms of their appearance. It is good solid evidence for the...having the ability of symbolic
communication, in other words, language.
1
Never know if Turkana Boy could speak. But are other clues to his intelligence: stone tools he left behind.
Homo erectus made tools = hand axes = chipped extensively on both sides = very, very versatile tools
point enables one to do piercing tasks
heavy bit here can be used for cracking bone or chopping wood. It's a
Stone tools represented a momentous change
once have stone tools = all the foods in the world could open up to you = tremendous survival
advantage.
When making stone tools, H. erectus recognize flaws in raw material – understood properties of stone
SIGNIFICANCE: capable of thinking ahead and planning consequences of their actions.
How do we know if these crucial changes go back all the way Homo erectus? Especially since skin and
hair are rarely preserved in the fossil record
look at the louse = it’s been intimately connected with hair for a long time
Humans have one kind of louse on their heads and another in the pubic area: why?
when we had body hair all over our bodies, we had one type of lice.
But then we became hairless until
only had hair on our heads and in our pubic region, and so, therefore, you would have this sort of
hairless geographic barrier to contact between the two.
human pubic louse is very different from the human head louse. Somehow, in the past, it seems
to have come from gorillas.
How it is our ancestors got pubic lice from gorillas
scenario is that when we lost our body hair, the original human louse migrated to our heads,
leaving the pubic area temporarily unpopulated by lice.
When our ancestors had contact with gorillas, gorilla louse colonized pubic region.
Eventually it turned into the human pubic louse of today.
When did human pubic louse and the gorilla louse diverged = molecular clock
estimated date for divergence = about 3 mya
SIGNIFICANCE: long before Turkana Boy, maybe even around Lucy's time,
our ancestors had slowly begun to lose their body hair.
Turkana Boy was mostly hairless = may be what allowed him to actively hunt down game.
Most animals at a disadvantage in the midday sun because they overheat.
They can only cool down by panting.
when they run fast they can't pant.
2
That means they can only run in short sprints.
Hypothesis = sweating gave our ancestors the ability to hunt in a very unusual way
persistence hunting.
Society is in every corner of our lives. What's behind it? Why did we become so social? Could it have
something to do with another innovation, something unprecedented in our evolution: building fires and
cooking?
Earliest evidence our ancestors deliberately used fire for cooking dates to long after H. erectus.
But Homo erectus was probably using fire for a variety of purposes
protect themselves at night from wild animals
and maybe cooking - which makes food more soft and digestible
Which might explain why Homo erectus evolved smaller teeth and a much smaller gut.
3
Perhaps these social instincts developed with Homo erectus
Along with cooperative hunting, bigger brains, longer childhoods and the use of fire?
Perhaps H. erectus were intelligent social beings with an increasing capacity for cooperation.
May be this made possible another great achievement = the exodus from Africa.
For millions of years, our earliest ancestors stayed in African = but at some point started to leave
Fossils and tools found as far away as China (at 1.3 mya) and Indonesia (1.8 mya)
Dmanisi, Georgia (in the Caucasus mountains) = fossils found there are about 1.8 mya
site turned up a treasure trove of early Homo (erectus?) fossils.
transformed our understanding of who left Africa and when.
showed that the first humans to leave Africa were much more primitive than Turkana Boy.
At four and a half feet tall = smaller than Turkana Boy, with more ape-like shoulders and a simple
stone technology, have small brains
Scientists now accept that as soon as Homo (erectus?) appeared = started to leave Africa
Perhaps even before appearance of Homo erectus.
Everything about floresiensis is an enigma. Where did they come from and what were they?
Some = just a dwarfed population of modern people – suffered from some disease
Others = evolved from Homo erectus = "island dwarfism"
Still others = descended from more primitive ancestor?
Of course, our ancestors didn't know they were leaving Africa. They just followed the animals
Process probably very, very slow
imagine a group of Homo erectus moving their range a kilometer a year in one direction. And
doing that continually over a long enough period of time, you can get the distance from Africa to
Indonesia covered in say, 15,000 years.
By a million years ago our ancestors had populated Asia from the Caucasus to Indonesia.
And they were in Europe too, as a recent discovery in Spain has shown
Homo erectus longevity was astonishing. A few pockets of Homo erectus may have been still clinging on
in Asia just 50,000 years ago.