Chess Base Magazine 165
Chess Base Magazine 165
Chess Base Magazine 165
The best female chessplayer in the against the top players. Now Yifan Hou has
world is Chinese gained the decisive Elo points in Gibraltar (see
also p. 10) to overtake Judit Polgar’s place as the
At the Chess Olympiad 2014 Judit Polgar an-
best woman player in the world (2686 compared
nounced her retirement from professional
chess. Born in 1976, the youngest of the three
Polgar sisters, she was the first woman to sur-
pass the 2600 Elo barrier as a 17 year-old. In
2003 she was already rated over 2700 Elo and
was the only woman playing alongside the male
elite of super grandmasters. For a long time
there was no-one anywhere near Judit Polgar
in the women’s world ranking list. The best fe-
male player, seemingly forever, was playing in
her own world – in the male world. It did not
look like any woman would again reach such
heights. However, Yifan Hou seems to be tread- Yifan Hou: best female player in the world
ing in Polgar’s footsteps. Naturally, after having
to 2675). Gibraltar 2012 also witnessed the only
encounter between these two exceptional wom-
en players. In the diagram the Chinese player
first collected material with 24.¤xe6! and won
the game in convincing fashion.
Yifan Hou’s success has not come by chance,
but as the result of long-term planning and
work in China. The Chinese women now oc-
cupy first place in the FIDE ranking list for
countries, which is based on the average of
the best ten players; and the men have also
reached second place behind Russia. And yet
the Chinese have hardly any active tournament
players. Number 100 in the Chinese ranking
list has only just 2200 Elo (as a comparison: in
two children Judit Polgar was not as active or
Germany it is 2440). But China has six players
as successful as at her peak and so the Chinese
above 2700, Germany only one.
player, born in 1994, was able to come ever
nearer to her on the world ranking list. At the Chess Olympiad 2014 the Chinese wom-
en were only just beaten by the Russians. But in
Unlike Polgar, Yifan Hou also plays in women’s
the men’s event the Chinese team surprisingly
tournaments, which is not necessarily con-
won the gold medal – for the first time in the
ducive to a rapid gain in Elo points. But as
history of this tournament, but certainly not for
women’s world champion, she also receives
the last time.
invitations to top level men’s tournaments and
there she has proved that she can hold her own Your André Schulz
(WORLD)MASTERLY:
CARLSEN VICTORIOUS IN WIJK ...
The classic Wijk aan Zee somehow remains a
special tournament. Perhaps because it is in
Wijk that the starting pistol is fired for the new
chess year. At the same time the Dutch organ-
isers regularly manage to bring together a field
of first rate players, who all play committed
and creative chess. And last but not least, the
unusual length of the tournament, 13 rounds
in all, allows unexpected twists and turns
throughout the days of the tournament. Take
for example the case of the world champion Magnus Carlsen: at one point 6 out of 6!, but still
who later subdivided his Wijk 2015 into three not content
phases: By the third round, after two draws
ier-Lagrave and Wesley So with wins. In the
and a defeat at the hands of Anand’s second
tiebreak system in use, had the world champion
Wojtaszek – an unsuccessful start. Next came
been defeated Vachier-Lagrave would have tak-
a run of six victories. But after that he was, just
en first place. But then in the endgame Carlsen
as at the start, not very successful – “pretty
avoided his second defeat at the hands of the
forgettable games” – remarked Carlsen in the
Croatian (after Tromsö 2014) and secured the
press conference.
required half point. There were also remark-
Before the final round the world champion was able performances from the youngest players in
in the lead, half a point ahead of Giri. And the the field: Giri and So once more distinguished
excitement grew even further. Against Saric, themselves and moved further into the Top-Ten
Carlsen was badly placed with White whilst at in the world rating list. On the DVD So, Ding
the same time Anish Giri had drawn level on Liren and Vachier-Lagrave have annotated their
points with Carlsen with a draw, as had Vach- best games for you.
gibraltar: an american
Eröffnung
storms the fortress
to concede his first draw to his closest rival,
David Howell. In the absence of his compatriots
Short and Adams, who in previous years had
regularly battled it out for tournament victory
in Gibraltar, fellow Englishman Howell was
there and having a good tournament.
After 9 out of 10 rounds Howell lay only half a
point behind the American. However, in the
final round he could not achieve a winning ad-
vantage against Yifan Hou and in the end could
actually feel satisfied with his draw. This was
Almost a one-man-show: Hikaru Nakamura had a to the joy of Nakamura, for whom a draw with
majestic start to finish victory in Gibraltar White was then sufficient for outright first place
in the tournament.
The “Tradewise Gibraltar Chess Festival” has
become one of the regular greats in world class
chess. This year there were even eight grand-
masters with an Elo rating superior to 2700
present, as well as women’s world champion
Yifan Hou and title defender Cheparinov.
English A20: 1.c4 e5 2.g3 ¤f6 3.¥g2 h6 It does not achieve much for White to copy
this waiting strategy with, e.g., 4.a3. Black then
replies 4...c6 and in the Keres Variation (3...c6)
h6 reveals itself to be more useful than a3. Two
other developing moves are more logical.
A) After 4.¤c3 ¥b4 we can see a quirk of 3...h6
(instead of 3...¤c6) – 5.¤d5 ¤xd5 6.cxd5
mainly simplification
Georgios Souleidis presents a new opening weapon
Double Fianchetto A50: 1.d4 ¤f6 2.c4 g6 been played many times at an earlier moment
3.¤f3 ¥g7 4.g3 b6 5.¥g2 ¥b7 6.0-0 0-0 and the position after 7.¤c3 has arisen in a dif-
ferent way. But the number of games is no guar-
antee of quality in this case, since after 7...¤e4
8.¤xe4 ¥xe4 Black immediately simplifies the
position and equalises effortlessly, as, e.g., in the
game Radjabov-Kramnik, Istanbul 2012, where
9.¥e3 c5 followed (9...d6 is also very playable
according to Souleidis, though 9...d5 is risky).
The ambitious alternative 7...e6 is, on the other
hand, risky. After 8.d5 exd5 9.cxd5 ¦e8 10.¦e1
things do not look so good for Black.
B) 7.d5 is considered more critical by our au-
thor, but the move immediately offers Black two
good continuations:
a) 7...¤e4 8.£c2 f5! and e.g. 9.¤bd2 ¤d6!, but
The diagram can arise after various move or- Caruanas 9.¦d1 is largely unexplored and per-
ders, but in general Black should not play ...b6 haps slightly better for White.
till ¤f3 and g3 have been played but not yet
b) 7...¤a6 is preferred by Tiviakov, after 8.¤c3
¥g2. Sergei Tiviakov has been a pioneer of this
¤c5 White has a choice between
plan amongst the top players, but nowadays
you will also find games by Carlsen, Kramnik
and Grischuk. Georgios Souleidis has done a
lot of work on this opening weapon which has
so far received only miserly treatment. As well
as a few side lines with 7.b3, 7.¦e1 or 7.£c2 the
author analyses above all two continuations.
A) 7.¤c3 is not only the most frequently played
move in our starting position, but the number of
games is almost double because ¤c3 has already
only as a surprise
Robert Ris suggests an actually impossible move
Sicilian B35: 1.e4 c5 2.¤f3 ¤c6 3.d4 cxd4 ¤a5 that White has to decide how things are to
4.¤xd4 g6 5.¤c3 ¥g7 6.¥e3 ¤f6 7.¥c4 0-0 continue. The games which have been played so
8.¥b3 d5!? far by consistently surprised players with White
do not supply much information.
A) 10.¤de2 hangs on to the pawn. Ris then
suggests 10...a6, Black develops with ...b5,
...¥b7, getting the pawn back quickly is not his
aim.
B) 10.0-0 is in the strictest sense similar, after
10...¤xb3 11.¤xb3 the knight has again disap-
peared from d4 and Black can easily continue
11...b6. The pressure against the §d5 and in the
two semi-open files gives sufficient compensa-
tion.
C) 10.£f3! seems to be the only real test for the
validity of 8...d5. Then 10...¥g4 11.£g3 should
Getting in the advance ...d5 in the Accelerated be followed by 11...¤xb3 12.axb3
Dragon is more of a pipe dream. Is it realistic
to think that this actually impossible move can
simply be played right from the basic position?
In his article Robert Ris also deals with alterna-
tives, but it is clear that it is not till after 9.exd5
disturbingly forced
Gergö Havasi gives insights into an important Tarrasch Variation
French C08: 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.¤d2 c5 4.exd5 hand, there is nothing wrong with 5...¥d7,
exd5 5.¥b5+ ¤c6 6.£e2+ ¥e7 7.dxc5 ¤f6 even today it is still preferred by many top
8.¤b3 0-0 players. In the diagram above left White has
the choice.
A) 9.¥e3 is intending queenside castling, but
Marin does not like the delay in development.
After 9...a6 10.¥a4 (10.¥xc6?! bxc6 followed by
...a5) 10...¤e4 11.0-0-0 ¤b4 Black can quickly
stage an attack which should at least give him a
level game.
B) 9.¤f3 is played less often but is preferred
by Marin. After 9...¦e8 10.¥e3 (10.0-0 ¥xc5
makes it too easy for Black) 10...a6 White has a
decision to take:
a) 11.¥xc6 bxc6 12.0-0 a5 and then ...a4 tends
to be to Black’s advantage.
In the previous issue we saw that after 6.¤gf3 b) 11.¥a4 ¤e4 and then the capture on c5.
Black has no problem playing 6...£e7+ or 6... c) 11.¥d3 looks the most natural:
cxd4. This time White gives a check on the
e-file. Of course Black should not now play
6...£e7 again – White still has his knight on g1
and would recapture on e2 with it.
But previously Mihail Marin looked into the
somewhat speculative question, why in his
WCh match in Merano in 1981 Kortschnoj
did not go for 5...¤c6; since the position after
6.¤gf3 ¥d6 had served him well seven years
previously in his first match against Karpov
– all six games ended in draws. The only ob-
jective reason could be 6.£e2+. On the other
Slav D11: 1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.¤f3 ¤f6 4.e3 ¥g4 plan, Russian grandmaster Alexander Riazant-
5.h3 ¥h5 6.g4 ¥g6 7.¤e5 sev has played in this way four times and has,
e.g., defeated Sergey Karjakin, though that was
in blitz chess.
The actual starting position only arises after 7...
e6 8.¤d2 ¤bd7 9.¤xg6 hxg6 10.¥g2. Now
there is no real need to fear 10...dxc4 11.¤xc4
¥b4+, both van Wely’s 12.¢e2 and also the
natural 12.¥d2 should according to Kuzmin
give slightly better play.
Since White would like to play g5, f4 taking
control of the black squares, 10...g5 is the usual
move; after 11.0-0 ¥d6 12.¦e1
Avoid exchanges
Evgeny Postny examines a topical Ragosin variation
Queen’s Gambit D38: 1.d4 ¤f6 2.c4 e6 3.¤f3 remains level. After 13...¤c6 14.¦fd1 we note
d5 4.¤c3 ¥b4 5.¥g5 h6 6.¥xf6 £xf6 7.e3 0-0 several games as White by the Hungarian GM
8.¦c1 dxc4 9.¥xc4 c5 10.0-0 cxd4
Catalan (Semi-Slav) E04: 1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.¤f3 however it is used more rarely nowadays; Stohl
¤f6 4.¤c3 e6 5.g3 considers that after 8.e4 White has an advan-
tage. 7...a6 is the modern move. Things con-
tinue in gambit style with 8.0-0 ¥b7 9.b3! cxb3
10.axb3 as in Kramnik-Giri, Doha 2014 (see
CBM 164). The result of that game is known,
but it is certainly too soon to write off the black
side; Stohl suggests some improvements for it.
However, Anish Giri drew his own conclusions
from the defeat: in Wijk aan Zee he played the
variation with the white pieces.
B) 6...¤bd7 is more flexible and gives White
the opportunity to play 7.a4, after which the
§c4 is easier to win. However the move wastes
time and weakens the b4-square.
But 7.0-0 ¥e7 8.e4 0-0 9.¥f4 continues in the
The starting point for Igor Stohl’s article is the
true spirit of the variation:
Semi-Slav with 5.g3. But most lines lead to
lines of the Catalan. Just like in the latter’s origi-
nal version Black can take on c4 (immediately
or on the next move) or keep the game very
closed.
Here we shall skip the closed part – the author
explains quite convincingly that White obtains
(if not an advantage) at least a comfortable
game. After 5...dxc4 6.¥g2 a decision needs to
be taken.
A) 6...b5 is obvious and after 7.¤e5 Black again
has the choice: 7...¤d5 is the most played move,
Bogo-Indian E11: 1.d4 ¤f6 2.c4 e6 3.¤f3 develop his ¥f1: after, for example, 9.¥d3 h6
¥b4+ 4.¤bd2 b6 5.a3 ¥xd2+ 6.¥xd2 ¥b7 10.¥h4 g5 11.¥g3 h5 12.h4 g4 Black wins the
7.¥g5 d6 8.e3 ¤bd7 §g2 and although White possesses compensa-
tion for it, and though this line has been played
by several strong players (Gelfand, Wojtaszek),
it is not the choice of our author.
Krasenkow continues with the solid 9.£c2.
If Black now completely refrains from a plan
with ...h6 and ...g5, he is probably simply
somewhat worse as White still has the bishop
pair. 9...h6 is therefore logical. But after
10.¥h4 Black may not push forward too soon
– 10...g5 11.¥g3 ¤e4 is met with 12.¥d3!, e.g.
12...f5 13.d5!
The correct way is first of all 10...£e7, which
is followed by 11.¦d1. Now the right time for
11...g5 12.¥g3 ¤e4 has arrived.
In the second part of his repertoire with
4.¤bd2 against the Bogo-Indian Michal
Krasenkow turns to the 4...b6 main variation.
In the diagram White has no good way to
You will find the solutions on page 21 or in detail in the tactics column on the DVD
You will find the solutions on page 21 or in detail in the endgame column on the DVD