Reduction Papr of Ofdm Signals by Combing SLM With DCT Transform

REDUCTION PAPR OF OFDM SIGNALS BY COMBING SLM WITH DCT TRANSFORM
1.INTRODUCTION
Orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) has been recently

seen rising popularity in wireless applica-tions. For wireless
communications, an OFDM-based system can provide greater immunity
to multi-path fad-ing and reduce the complexity of equalizers. Now
OFDM have been included in digital audio/video broad-casting
(DAB/DVB) standard in Europe, and IEEE 802.11, IEEE 802.16
wireless broadband access systems, etc.
However, OFDM also has its shortcoming. The major drawback of

OFDM signal is its large peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR), which
causes poor power efficiency or serious performance degradation to
transmit power amplifier. To reduce the PAPR, many techniques have
been proposed. Such as clipping, partial transmit sequence (PTS) [1],
selected mapping (SLM) [2], interleaving, nonlinear companding
transforms, hadamard transforms [3] and other techniques etc [4,5].
These schemes can mainly be categorized into signal scrambling
techniques, such as PTS, and signal distortion techniques such as
clipping. Among those PAPR reduction methods, the simplest scheme is
to use the clipping process. However, using clipping processing causes
both in-band distortion and out-of-band distortion. The bit error rate of
system is degraded by using clipping. The SLM is relatively at-tractive
since it can obtain better PAPR by modifying the OFDM signal without
distortion. The main disadvantage of SLM is that its complexity is high.
Now many exten-sion schemes for reducing complexity of LSM have
been presented [6,7]. In this paper, an efficient reducing PAPR
technique based on joint SLM and DCT matrix transform is proposed.
The organization of this paper is as follow. Section 2 presents

OFDM signal model and formulates the prob-lem of PAPR. Section 3,
the reduction PAPR schemes based on combined DCT transform matrix
VIJAY RURAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE Page 1

and SLM technique are proposed. Numerical results are presented in

Section 4. Section 5 draws conclusions.
2. OFDM Signal and Problem Formulation
2.1. OFDM Signal Model and PAPR Problem
In this section, we review the basic of OFDM transmitter and the

PAPAR definition. Consider an OFDM consist-ing of N subcarriers. Let
a block of N symbol 𝑋 = {𝑋𝐾 , 𝐾 = 0,1,….,N-1}is formed with each
symbol modulating one of a set of subcarriers. {𝑓𝑘 , 𝐾 = 0,1, … . , 𝑁 − 1}
The N subcarriers are chosen to be or-thogonal, that is,𝑓𝑘 = 𝑘∆𝑓, where
∆𝑓 = 1/(𝑁𝑇) and T is the original symbol period. Therefore, the
complex baseband OFDM signal can be written as
1 𝑡
x(t)= ∑𝑁−1
𝐾=0 𝑋𝐾 𝑒
𝑗2𝜋𝑓𝑘
, 0 ≤ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑁𝑇 ………(1)
√𝑁
In general, the PAPR of OFDM signals x(t) is defined as the ratio period
between the maximum instanta-neous power and its average power
during an OFDM symbol
𝑚𝑎𝑥0≤𝑡≤𝑁𝑇 [|𝑋(𝑡 2 )|]

PAPR= 𝑁𝑇 … … … ….(2)
1/(𝑁𝑇) ∫0 |𝑋(𝑡 2 )|𝑑𝑡
Reducing themax |𝑥(𝑡)| is the principle goal of PAPR reduction

techniques. In practice, most systems deal with a discrete-time signal,
therefore, we have to sample the continuous-time signal x(t).
To better approximate the PAPR of continuous-time OFDM signals,
the OFDM signals samples are obtained by L times oversamping. By
sampling x(t) defined in Equation (1), at frequency 𝑓𝑠 = 𝐿/𝑇 wher L is

the oversampling factor, the discrete-time OFDM symbol can be written

as
𝑗2𝜋
1 𝐾𝑛
X(n)= ∑𝑁−1
𝐾=0 𝑋𝐾 𝑒 𝑁𝐿 , 0 ≤ 𝑛 ≤ 𝑁𝐿 − 1…….(3)
√𝑁
Equation (3) can be implemented by using a length (NL) IFFT operation.

The new input vector X is ex-tended from original X by using the so-
called zero-padding scheme, i.e., by inserting (L-1)N ze-ros in the
middle of X. The PAPR computed form the L-times oversampled time
domain OFDM signal sam-ples can be defined as
𝑚𝑎𝑥0≤𝑡≤𝑁𝐿−1 [|𝑋(𝑛)2 |]
PAPR[x(n)]=101𝑔 ………(4)
𝐸[|𝑋(𝑛)2 |]
However, the PAPR does not increase significantly after L=4 . In order
to avoid aliasing the out-of-band distortion into the data bearing tones
and in order to ac-curately describe the PAPR an oversampling factor
L≥ 4 is required.
We can evaluate the performance of PAPR using the cumulative

distribution of PAPR of OFDM signal. The cumulative distribution
function (CDF) is one of the most regularly used parameters, which is
used to meas-ure the efficiency of and PAPR technique. The CDF of the
amplitude of a signal sample is given by
F(Z)=1-exp(2)………….(5)

However, the complementary CDF (CCDF) is used instead of CDF, which

helps us to measure the probabil-ity that the PAPR of a certain data
block exceeds the given threshold. The CCDF of the PAPR of the data
block is desired is our case to compare outputs of various reduction
techniques. This is given by
P(PAPR> 2) = 1 − 𝑃(𝑃𝐴𝑃𝑅 > 2)
=1-(𝐹 (𝑍))𝑁 =1-(1-exp(−𝑧))𝑁 ………(6)

2.2. Selected Mapping (SLM)
The SLM technique was first described by Bauml et al. [3]. In

the SLM, the input data sequences are multiplied by each of the
phase sequences to generate alternative input symbol sequences.
Each of these alternative input data sequences is made the IFFT
operation, and then the one with the lowest PAPR is selected for
transmission. Figure 1 shows the block of the SLM technique. X
is the OFDM data block,Bu is the phase vectors and Xu is the
modified data vectors in the frequency domain. So the time
domain signal
𝐾=𝑁−1
1
𝑥𝑢(𝑡) = ∑ 𝑋𝐾 𝐵𝑢 , 𝑒 𝑗2𝜋𝑘∆𝑓𝑡 , 0 ≤ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑁𝑇 … . . (7)
√𝑁 𝐾=0
where u=1, 2,…,Uand N is length of X, also the number of sub-

carriers. N
Among the modified data blocks, the one with the lowest PAPR
is selected for transmission. The amount of PAPR reduction for
SLM depends on the number of phase sequences U and the
design of the phase sequences.

2.3. DCT Transform
The Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) is a Fourier-like

transform, which was first proposed by Ahmed et al. (1974) [8].
The idea to use the DCT transform is to re-duce the
autocorrelation of the input sequence to reduce the peak to
average power problem and it requires no side information to be
transmitted to the receiver. In the section, we briefly review
DCT transform.
The formal definition of the DCT of one-dimensional of length N
is given by the following formula
𝜋(2𝑛+1)𝑘
𝑋𝐶 (𝐾 ) = 𝛼 (𝐾 ) ∑𝑁−1
𝑛=0 𝑥 (𝑛) cos[ ]……..(8)
2𝑁
For K=0 … N-1

Similarly,the invers transformation is defined as
𝜋(2𝑛+1)𝑘
X(n)=∝ (𝑘) ∑𝑁−1
𝑢=0 𝛼 (𝑘 ) 𝑋𝐶 𝐶𝑂𝑆[ ] …… (9)
2𝑁
For n=0 …. N-1

For both equation( ) and( )𝛼(𝑢) is defind as
1
𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑘=0
√𝑁
𝛼 (𝑢) = { 2 …..(10)
𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑘≠0
√𝑁
The equation ( ) is expressed in matrix below

𝑋𝐶 = 𝐶𝑁 𝑋 ……(11)
Where 𝑋𝑐 and X are both vector with NX1, and CN is a DCT
transform matrix with N×N. The row (or column) of the DCT
matrix 𝐶𝑁 are orthogonal matrix vectors. Then we can use this
property of the DCT ma-trix and reduce the peak power of
OFDM signals.

3. Proposed Schemes
The main idea of the proposed scheme is to use a com-bination

of two appropriate methods. One is the DCT matrix transform
technique and the other is the SLM technique. The technique is
similar to the scheme pro-posed in literature [6]. The transmitter
block is showed in Figure 1. We call this scheme is scheme 1.
In the trans-mit end, the data stream is firstly transformed by
DCT matrix, then the transformed data is processed by the SLM
unit. If data block passed by DCT matrix before IFFT, the
autocorrelation coefficients of IFFT input is reduced, then the
PAPR of OFDM signal could be re-duced.
In this paper, we use DCT matrix after SLM to further reduce
the PAPR of signal. We call this scheme as scheme 2. In his
fashion, the autocorrelation of the signal, which has been
processed by SLM, is reduced by DCT matrix transform. The
PAPR of fine output signal is fur-ther reduced. The block of
transmitter is showed in Fig-ure 2

4. Simulation Results
In this section, computer simulations are used to evaluate the

peak-to-average ratio reduction capability with pro-posed
scheme. The channel is modeled an additive while Gaussian
noise (AWGN). In simulation, an OFDM sys-tem is considered
with subcarrier N=64 and QPSK modulation. In SLM unit, U
different random phase se-quences are used.
The results of original SLM are given in Figure 3. We can see
that the reduction effect is improved with the increasing of sub-
block number U.
The results of proposed schemes 1 are given in Figure 4 and
Figure 5 is the results of proposed scheme 2. From these
figures, we see that our proposed scheme 1 and scheme 2 for
QPSK have better performance than origi-nal SLM (Figure
3).When U = 2 and CCDF = 10-3, the proposed scheme 1 may
reduces PAPR about 1.8 dB and the proposed scheme 2 may
reduces about 1.2db

Compared Figure 4 and Figure 5, we can see that the

performances of proposed scheme 2 is better than the proposed
scheme 1 when the increasing of sub-block number U > 4. At U
= 16, the proposed scheme 2 may reduce about 1 dB compared
with the proposed scheme 1.
5. Conclusion
In this paper, techniques for PAPR reduction of OFDM signals

have been proposed. These techniques combine the SLM
technique and DCT transform. The scheme 1 is composed of
DCT matrix transform followed by conven-tional SLM, while
DCT transform is used before con-ventional SLM processing
unit in proposed scheme 2. The PAPR reduction performances
are evaluated by computer simulation. Simulation results state
that the PAPR reduction performance is greatly improved com-
pared to conventional SLM. When sub-block number U = 2 and
CCDF = 10-3, the proposed scheme 1 may re-duces PAPR about
1.8 dB and the proposed scheme 2 may reduces about 1.2 dB.

6. Acknowledgement
The author would like to thank the reviewer for their detailed
and useful suggestions that have helped the presentation of this
paper.

7. References
 R. W. Bauml, R. F. Fischer and J. B. Huber, “Reducing the

Peak-to-Average Power Ration of Multicarrier Modu-lation
by Selected Mapping,” Electronics Letters, Vol. 32, No. 22,
1996, pp. 2050-2057.
 S. H. Muller and J. B. Huber, “OFDM with Reduced Peak

to Average Power Ratio by Optimum Combination of
Partial Transmit Sequences,” IEEE Electronics Letters,
Vol. 33, No. 5, 1997, pp. 368-369.
 M. Park, J. Heeyong, J. Cho, N. Cho, D. Hong and C.

Kang, “PAPR Reduction in OFDM Transmission Using
Hadamard Transform,” IEEE International Conference on
Communications, Vol. 1, June 2000, pp. 430-433.
 T. Jiang and Y. Wu, “An Overview: Peak-to-Average

Power Ratio Reduction Techniques for OFDM Signals,”
IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, Vol. 54, No. 2, June
2008, pp. 257-268.
 S. H. Han and J. H. Lee, “An Overview of Peak-to-Average

Power Ratio Reduction Techniques for Multicarrier
Transmission,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communi-
cations, Vol. 12, No. 2, April 2005, pp. 56-65.
 Zolghadrasli and M. H. Ghamat, “An Overview of PAPR

Reduction Techniques for Multicarrier Transmis-sion and
Propose of New Techniques for PAPR Reduction,” Iranian
Journal of Electrical and Computer Engi-neering, Vol. 7,

No. 2, Summer-Fall 2008, pp. 115-120.
 N. V. Irukulapati, V. K. Chaka and A. Jain, “SLM Based

PAPR Reduction of OFDM Signal Using New Phase Se-
quence,” Electronics Letters, Vol. 45, No. 24, 2009, pp.
1231-1232.
 N. T. Ahmed, Natarajan and K. R. Rao, “Discrete Consine

Transform,” IEEE Transactions on Computer, Vol. 23,
1974, pp. 90-93

Reduction Papr of Ofdm Signals by Combing SLM With DCT Transform

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Reduction Papr of Ofdm Signals by Combing SLM With DCT Transform

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Reduction Papr of Ofdm Signals by Combing SLM With DCT Transform

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

REDUCTION PAPR OF OFDM SIGNALS BY COMBING SLM WITH DCT TRANSFORM

Orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) has been recently

However, OFDM also has its shortcoming. The major drawback of

The organization of this paper is as follow. Section 2 presents

VIJAY RURAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE Page 1

and SLM technique are proposed. Numerical results are presented in

2. OFDM Signal and Problem Formulation

2.1. OFDM Signal Model and PAPR Problem

In this section, we review the basic of OFDM transmitter and the

𝑚𝑎𝑥0≤𝑡≤𝑁𝑇 [|𝑋(𝑡 2 )|]

Reducing themax |𝑥(𝑡)| is the principle goal of PAPR reduction

VIJAY RURAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE Page 2

the oversampling factor, the discrete-time OFDM symbol can be written

Equation (3) can be implemented by using a length (NL) IFFT operation.

We can evaluate the performance of PAPR using the cumulative

VIJAY RURAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE Page 3

However, the complementary CDF (CCDF) is used instead of CDF, which

P(PAPR> 2) = 1 − 𝑃(𝑃𝐴𝑃𝑅 > 2)

=1-(𝐹 (𝑍))𝑁 =1-(1-exp(−𝑧))𝑁 ………(6)

VIJAY RURAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE Page 4

2.2. Selected Mapping (SLM)

The SLM technique was first described by Bauml et al. [3]. In

where u=1, 2,…,Uand N is length of X, also the number of sub-

VIJAY RURAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE Page 5

2.3. DCT Transform

The Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) is a Fourier-like

For K=0 … N-1

For n=0 …. N-1

The equation ( ) is expressed in matrix below

VIJAY RURAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE Page 6

VIJAY RURAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE Page 7

The main idea of the proposed scheme is to use a com-bination

VIJAY RURAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE Page 8

In this section, computer simulations are used to evaluate the

VIJAY RURAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE Page 9

Compared Figure 4 and Figure 5, we can see that the

In this paper, techniques for PAPR reduction of OFDM signals

VIJAY RURAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE Page 10

VIJAY RURAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE Page 11

 R. W. Bauml, R. F. Fischer and J. B. Huber, “Reducing the

 S. H. Muller and J. B. Huber, “OFDM with Reduced Peak

 M. Park, J. Heeyong, J. Cho, N. Cho, D. Hong and C.

 T. Jiang and Y. Wu, “An Overview: Peak-to-Average

 S. H. Han and J. H. Lee, “An Overview of Peak-to-Average

 Zolghadrasli and M. H. Ghamat, “An Overview of PAPR

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engi-neering, Vol. 7,

 N. V. Irukulapati, V. K. Chaka and A. Jain, “SLM Based

 N. T. Ahmed, Natarajan and K. R. Rao, “Discrete Consine

VIJAY RURAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE Page 13

You might also like