DOES CHRIST OCCUPY DAVID’S

THRONE NOW?
FREDERIC R. HOWE
Professor of Systematic Theology, Emeritus
Dallas Theological Seminary
Dallas, TX

I. INTRODUCTION
The Lord Jesus told the church of the Laodiceans, “To him who
overcomes I will grant to sit with Me on My throne, as I also overcame
and sat down with my Father on His throne (Rev 3:21, italics added).
Clearly Jesus is currently seated on a throne.
A controversy exists among Dispensationalists today concerning the
throne on which Jesus is seated. Classic Dispensationalists say this is the
Father’s throne, and that Jesus’ seating on His own throne (“My throne,”
Rev 3:21) is yet future. The Davidic rule of the Son of God is not yet.
Progressive Dispensationalists (PDs), however, suggest that Jesus is
already seated on the Davidic throne. In fact, PDs say that Jesus is cur-
rently ruling as the Davidic King.
In this paper we will consider the claims of both positions.

II. A FUTURE-ONLY REALIZATION

The reality of the biblical promise of 2 Sam 7:14-16 is confirmed in
the announcement by the angel Gabriel to Mary, recorded in Luke 1:31-
33. In that affirmation, the angel assured Mary that Jesus would receive
the throne of David, and that He would rule. As the incarnate ministry of
Jesus Christ unfolded, the nearness of the kingdom was demonstrated,
and yet sadly so too was its rejection by Israel. Matthew 19:28 is a focal
passage, for it states: “And Jesus said to them, “Assuredly I say to you,
that in the regeneration, when the Son of Man sits on the throne of His
glory, you who have followed Me will also sit on the twelve thrones,
judging the twelve tribes of Israel.” The implication of this text seems
obvious; it will be in the regeneration (palingenesis, new world) that
Christ will sit on His glorious throne, and this does not refer in any sense

65
66 Journal of the Grace Evangelical Society Spring 2006

to a present occupancy by the Lord Jesus Christ of the Davidic throne.1

Possibly one of the most concise defenses of this “future only” realiza-
tion is found in H. C. Thiessen’s book Lectures in Systematic Theology:
Under the figure of the nobleman, Christ is represented as go-
ing “to a distant country to receive a kingdom for Himself”
(Luke 19:12). Just as Archaelaus, on the death of his father
Herod, had to go to Rome to have the kingdom confirmed to
him before he could actually rule as king, so Christ had to re-
turn to heaven to receive the kingdom from the Father (Dan.
7:13f.). The kingdom was pledged to him by the angel Gabriel
(Luke 1:32f.), but it must not be overlooked that the Word
says, “The Lord God will give Him the throne of His father
David.” For this purpose he went back to heaven. But as with
Archaelaus, Christ did not establish his throne in the far coun-
try, but he will return to the scene from which he departed,
and there set up his kingdom. Jesus is now seated, not upon
David’s throne, but upon his Father’s throne (Rev. 3:21). The
time will come when he shall sit upon his own throne (Matt.
19:28; 25:31). After he has thus come in glory, he will say to
those on his right hand, “Come you who are blessed of My Fa-
ther, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation
of the world” (Matt. 25:34).2
This analogy seems viable and realistic to this writer. Adherents of
the “future only” realization of the Davidic promise do not deny the
Lordship of Christ, and the fact that He is “the same, yesterday, today
and forever.” As Charles Ryrie succinctly states:
Though He never ceases to be King and, of course, is King to-
day as always, Christ is never designated as King of the
church (Acts 17:7 and 1 Timothy 1:17 are no exceptions, and
Revelation 15:3, “King of saints,” KJV, is “King of nations”
in the critical texts). Though Christ is a King today, He does
not rule as King. This awaits His second coming. Then the
Davidic kingdom will be realized (Matt. 25:31; Rev. 19:15,

1
Editor’s note: Another implication is that when Jesus rules, so will the
apostles. If Jesus is ruling today from the throne of David, then the apostles are
sitting on twelve thrones ruling over the twelve tribes of Israel.
2
Henry C. Thiessen, Lectures in Systematic Theology, rev. Vernon D. Do-
erksen (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1979), 363-64.
 Does Christ Occupy David’s Throne Now? 67

20). Then the Priest will sit on His throne, bringing to this
earth the long-awaited Golden Age (Ps. 110).3

III. PRESENT AND FUTURE REALIZATIONS: PROGRESSIVE

DISPENSATIONALISTS
In recent years, some PDs have articulated exactly the opposite con-
clusion. PDs suggest that the Davidic covenant promise of rulership has
already been fulfilled, and that Christ’s present session in heaven in-
volves His occupancy of the Davidic throne. There will also be a future
reign on the earth in the millennial kingdom when the political aspects of
the Davidic covenant will be fulfilled. Darrell Bock presented specific
reasons why this position is advocated. A concise summary of this posi-
tion is found as follows:
We need to note that the New Testament does indicate that the
political aspects of Jesus’ Davidic kingship will be fulfilled in
the future. But earlier dispensationalists tended to miss the fact
that in biblical theology, the Davidic nature of Christ’s
present activity guarantees the fulfillment of all of the Davidic
promise in the future, including the national and political di-
mensions of that promise.4
A key to this position is the thought that Christ’s present session in
heaven is seen in the specific light of the promise to David. These basic
reasons are offered as to the Davidic nature of Christ’s present activity.
First, Acts 1:3 is cited. Bock reasons that the disciples were expect-
ing the restoration of the kingdom of Israel (Acts 1:6), and that kingdom
was the Davidic kingdom. Jesus did not deny the validity of their inquiry,
but affirmed that His rule is within the Father’s control.
Second, several passages are cited in support of the concept that
Christ’s present activity in heaven is within the sphere of the Davidic
covenant. These are Matthew 24; Acts 3:21; Rom 11:26; Heb 2:5; and
2 Tim 4:1.

3
Charles C. Ryrie, Basic Theology (Wheaton, IL: Victor Books, 1986),
259.
4
Craig Blaising and Darrell L. Bock, Progressive Dispensationalism
(Wheaton, IL: Victor Books, 1993), 180.
68 Journal of the Grace Evangelical Society Spring 2006

Third, it is affirmed that Christ’s present session in heaven is a Da-

vidic blessing. And this is what the NT declares to have been granted to
Jesus, Son of David.5
A line of evidence is given also for this position from Matt 28:18.
Bock explains that those who object to the Davidic rule in heaven now as
fulfillment of the Davidic covenant fail
…to understand the divine human unity of Christ’s person, as
well as how that unity fulfills the converging prophecies of di-
vine messianic rule in the eschatological kingdom of
God…Added to this is the fact that His humanity is not ge-
neric; He is a descendant of David who has been anointed, en-
throned, and given “all authority in heaven and on earth”
(Matt. 28:18). When he acts, He acts as the divine and Davidic
King.6

IV. EVALUATION OF BOTH VIEWS

In the opinion of this writer, the biblical evidence points clearly in
the direction of the first view, namely, that the Davidic throne promises
will be fulfilled in the future, and that Christ’s present session in heaven
does not represent rulership on the Davidic throne. A central passage that
can be of help in this evaluation is found in Rom 1:3-4. The text states:
“concerning His Son Jesus Christ our Lord, who was born of the seed of
David according to the flesh, and declared to be the Son of God with
power according to the Spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the
dead.”
Notice closely that in the contrast between the two realms, the hu-
man nature of the Theanthropic person of the Lord Jesus Christ is from
the line or seed of David. However, His human nature is a true human
nature, and indeed it is generic as well as Davidic (in contradistinction
from Bock’s statement that Christ’s humanity is not generic). The term
“generic” simply means or describes an entity that relates to a whole
group or class. The Lukan genealogy demonstrates our Lord’s descent all
the way back to Adam, the generic head of the human race. Historic or-
thodox Christology has articulated the miracle and mystery of the God-
man, and orthodox theologians have defended the truth that Christ’s

5
Ibid., 184.
6
Ibid., 185-86.
 Does Christ Occupy David’s Throne Now? 69

human nature is genuine, an essential human nature, inherited from

Adam, yet without sin in view of the miraculous conception and virgin
birth.
The point of bringing this matter up at this juncture is immediately
seen in the contrast between “the seed of David according to the flesh,”
and “declared to be the Son of God with power according to the Spirit of
holiness.” If ever there was a place to insert or to assume the concept that
Christ was granted the throne of David at the ascension, it surely could
have been here. Yet, the text itself shows that He is not declared Son of
David, but Son of God with power. To be sure, this is an argument from
silence. However, in this writer’s opinion, it is highly significant that as
seated at the right hand of the Majesty on High, the term “Son of God” is
the central and key term. John Murray captured the importance of this
text as follows:
Thus, when we come back to the expression “according to the
Spirit of holiness,” our inference is that it refers to that stage
of pneumatic endowment upon which Jesus entered through
his resurrection. The text, furthermore, expressly relates “Son
of God with power according to the Spirit of holiness” with
“the resurrection from the dead” and the appointment can be
none other than that which came to be by the resurrection. The
thought of verse 4 would then be that the lordship in which he
was instated by the resurrection is one all-pervasively condi-
tioned by pneumatic powers. The relative weakness of his pre-
resurrection state, reflected on in verse 3, is contrasted with
the triumphant power exhibited in his post-resurrection lord-
ship. What is contrasted is not a phase in which Jesus is not
the Son of God and another in which he is. He is the incarnate
Son of God in both states, humiliation and exaltation, and to
regard him as the Son of God in both states belongs to the es-
sence of Paul’s gospel as the gospel of god. But the pre-
resurrection and post-resurrection states are compared and
contrasted, and the contrast hinges on the investiture with
power by which the latter is characterized.7
The present session of the Lord Jesus Christ is seen in the dignity of
His presence at the right hand of the Father, waiting for the culmination
of events in time-space history leading to His enthronement in fulfillment

7
John Murray, The Epistle to the Romans (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans Pub-
lishing Co., 1959-65), 1:12.
70 Journal of the Grace Evangelical Society Spring 2006

of the Davidic Covenant in the Father’s designated time. This does not in
the least take away from Christ’s authority, power, and sovereignty now.
The future fulfillment of the Davidic promise of kingly rule comes to
full fruition in the Millennium. This is vividly described in Jer 23:5: “Be-
hold, the days are coming,” says the Lord, “That I will raise to David a
Branch of righteousness; A King shall reign and prosper, and execute
judgment and righteousness in the earth.”

V. CONCLUSION
The Lord Jesus is currently seated at the right hand of the Father on a
throne. In this writer’s opinion, He is seated as the Son of God ascended
and glorified. He now awaits the triumph of His being seated on David’s
throne in the millennial kingdom. The Lord is in no sense sitting on the
throne of David today. He is not currently ruling as the promised Davidic
King.
It is profitable to ponder the significance of 2 Pet 3:13-14 in the light
of future events. After stating truth about the coming day of God accom-
panied by events which are believed to be even following the Millen-
nium (the destruction of the present earth), Peter urges believers with
these words: “Therefore, beloved, looking forward to these things, be
diligent to be found by Him in peace, without spot and blameless.” This
strong appeal to believers right now in the present church age is made,
even in the light of events that, prophetically speaking, are in the distant
future, even past the Millennium. The entire eschatological sweep forms
a fitting basis for a holy life even at the present time. This vantage point
puts discussions about the kingdom into a balanced and proper frame-
work. It makes an urgent appeal to participants in discussions about these
issues to keep balance, and to engage in the discussions with Christian
courtesy and mutual respect, even amongst the differing viewpoint hold-
ers’ concepts, thus fulfilling Rom 12:10: “Be kindly affectionate to one
another with brotherly love, in honor giving preference to one another.”