Using The Developmental Assessment of Young Children (DAYC) : Jefferson Digital Commons
Using The Developmental Assessment of Young Children (DAYC) : Jefferson Digital Commons
Using The Developmental Assessment of Young Children (DAYC) : Jefferson Digital Commons
5-1-2006
Recommended Citation
Muhlenhaupt, Mary, "Using the Developmental Assessment of Young Children (DAYC)" (2006).
Department of Occupational Therapy Faculty Papers. Paper 3.
https://jdc.jefferson.edu/otfp/3
This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Jefferson Digital Commons. The Jefferson Digital Commons is a service of Thomas
Jefferson University's Center for Teaching and Learning (CTL). The Commons is a showcase for Jefferson books and journals, peer-reviewed scholarly
publications, unique historical collections from the University archives, and teaching tools. The Jefferson Digital Commons allows researchers and
interested readers anywhere in the world to learn about and keep up to date with Jefferson scholarship. This article has been accepted for inclusion in
Department of Occupational Therapy Faculty Papers by an authorized administrator of the Jefferson Digital Commons. For more information, please
contact: JeffersonDigitalCommons@jefferson.edu.
Using the Developmental Assessment
Self-Study Module
Revised
July 2006
This module is designed for those who use the Developmental Assessment of
Young Children (DAYC) as part of early intervention.
To complete the activities in this module, you will need a copy of the five DAYC
subtests, the Profile/Examiner Summary Sheet, and the DAYC Examiner’s Manual.
Learning Objectives
• discuss the use of the DAYC in the Philadelphia Early Intervention system.
• calculate a child’s chronological age in order to establish the start point for
administering the DAYC.
• find the basal and ceiling in order to calculate DAYC raw scores.
• Cognition
• Communication
• Social-Emotional
• Physical Development
• Adaptive Behavior
It is designed for children from birth through 5 years and 11 months of age. The five
subtests relate to the areas of development that are evaluated for early intervention
eligibility and children’s developmental performance in accordance with the Individuals
with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA).
Philadelphia Early Intervention is divided into two systems: MRS (birth -3) and Elwyn
(3-5). In order to provide consistency in determining eligibility across the city and
across age levels, and to provide a smoother transition between the two systems when
children turn three, MRS and Elwyn established a policy that both systems would use
the Developmental Assessment for Young Children (Voress and Maddox, 1998).
Children entering the system before 2.6 years of age have an initial evaluation
performed using the Infant Toddler Developmental Assessment (Provence, Erikson,
Vater & Palmeri, 1995). Children 2.6 years and older receive an initial evaluation using
the DAYC. All annual evaluations use the DAYC.
No specific testing materials are used with the DAYC. Since children often exhibit
different behaviors during a formal evaluation, the DAYC is designed to be completed
through observation in the child’s natural setting. This provides a more accurate
assessment of the child’s skills. If certain skills are not observed, primary caregivers
can be interviewed to gain the information. A variety of materials in the child’s natural
environment are helpful as the DAYC is administered (see listing on next page).
Important reminders:
♦ If you know that the child’s environment does not contain items that
you will need, then it is necessary to bring them with you. The key is
to keep the feel of the setting as informal as possible.
♦ Do not go item by item through the test. You should have a sense of what
you are looking for by studying the items beforehand. Incorporate opportunities
for the child to demonstrate skills that you need to observe into your play
with the child, observations and caregiver interview.
♦ For those skills that require the examiner to work directly with the child,
join the child’s play and introduce items or games that fit into the child’s
natural play activity.
Toys Books__________
The first step in administering the DAYC is to establish the child’s chronological age.
The child’s date of birth is subtracted from the date of testing in order to determine his
or her chronological age. The resulting chronological age is used to establish the starting
point on each subtest.
Example:
Year Month Day
Date of Testing 2004 6 5 12 + 30 =42
Date of Birth 2002 2 29
Chronological Age 2 3 13
When the day of the child’s testing (in this example, 12) is smaller than the day of the
child’s birth (in this example, 29), then you subtract one month and add 30 days to the
testing date before you calculate chronological age. This child is 27 months old.
Example:
Year Month Day
Date of Testing 2004 3 2 + 12 = 14 11
Date of Birth 2002 8 3
Chronological Age 1 6 8
If the month of the child’s birth (in this example, 8) is larger than the month of
testing (in this example, 2), then you subtract one year and add 12 months to the testing
date before you calculate chronological age. This child is 18 months old.
There will be times when you have to borrow from both the year and the month of the
testing date before you calculate chronological age. This child is 31 months old.
Practice Opportunity
Answers to Worksheet A:
1) 17 months
2) 21 months
3) 10 months
4) 32 months
Open up one of the subtests. Before the first scoring item you will see Start Age:
Birth. As you look through the list of items you will also find Start Age: 12 months,
Start Age: 24 months, Start Age: 36 months, and Start Age 48 months. Select the
start age that is closest to, but not older than, the child’s chronological age. The item
listed immediately following this “Start Age” is where you will begin the assessment.
As an example, for a 22 month old child, the DAYC subtest administration begins at
Start Age: 12 months.
The score is given based on skills demonstrated during play. It’s important to try to
score DAYC items based on observation of the child’s play and minimize the need to
ask parents if the child is able to perform specific skills. When a child performs the
skill, place a 1 next to the item. When the skill is not observed during play, ask the
parent if the child can accomplish the performance. When the parent reports that the
child performs the skill, record a 1; when parent reports the child doesn’t perform the
skill, place a 0 next to the item.
Once the ceiling is established, go back and find the basal. Three consecutive
items, each with a score of 1 represent the basal. If you go back to the starting
point of the subtest and still do not have a basal, then you need to work
backwards and score the items listed for the previous age range until three
consecutive items are scored with 1’s, or until you’ve scored all of the subtest’s
remaining items.
Item # Score
For example:
20 1
Administration started
1. Note the item number at the end of the basal (the third consecutive item that
was scored with 1 point). This item number is the start of the raw score
computation.
2. The points scored after the basal and through to the end of the ceiling are
totaled. Note: Any 1’s that follow the ceiling range are NOT counted.
3. Add these two numbers and you have the child’s raw score.
For example:
basal
were scored with a 1). The 2 1
ceiling range is items 4-8
(3 of these 5 items were 3 1
scored with a 0). 4 0
5 1
3 is the start of the raw
ceiling
score computation. Two 6 1
points were scored on items 7 0
beyond the basal and 8 0
through to the end of the
ceiling (1 point for each, 9
items #5 and #6). These two
numbers are added (3+2),
making the child’s raw
score = 5.
Learning Activity
Study the examples on the next two pages to get a clearer picture of
how basals and ceilings are established and how raw scores are
calculated.
For example:
Item # Score
This child’s ceiling is items 20 1
#33-37. There are several
21 1
series of three consecutive
items in which one point was 22 1
scored (items 20-22, 21-23, 23 1
22-24, 26-28, 27-29, 28-30,
24 1
29-31 and 30-32). The basal
that’s closest to the ceiling is 25 0
used to compute raw score 26 1
points. 27 1
Item # Score
1 1 Scoring procedures are the same when the
basal
ceiling
12 0
Practice Opportunity
Example A:
(Note: the basal did not occur between the starting point
and the ceiling. The evaluator needed to work backwards
through the previous group of items to find the basal.)
Example B.:
Example C:
1. When the number date of a child’s birth is greater than the testing date,
subtract one month from the date of testing and add 30 days, then compute the
chronological age.
2. When the number of the child’s birth month is greater than the number of the
test month, subtract one year from the date of testing and add 12 months, then
compute the chronological age.
3. To find the entry point for items to be administered, convert the chronological
age into months and select the next youngest start age on the Score Sheet.
6. There can be several basals and ceilings. Always pick the basal and the ceiling
that are closest together when computing the raw score. Basals and ceilings
can also overlap.
7. When computing raw score points, use the item # at the end of the basal (the
third item that was given 1 point) as your starting score, even if there are 0’s
recorded in items before the basal.
8. Once the basal establishes the starting score, only the 1’s are counted until
you get through the ceiling range.
9. Stop adding the raw score points once you get through the ceiling,
even if there are 1’s after the ceiling.
10. Be sure that you are using the correct conversion table for the subtest you are
scoring.
Using this table, you can identify if there Chronological 25% delay
are any developmental areas in which a Age
child demonstrates a 25% delay.
1 month
2 months 1 month
3 months 2 months
For example:
4 months 3 months
A 24 month old child who 5 months 3 months
achieves an age equivalent of 6 months 4 months
18 months or younger in a 7 months 5 months
particular developmental area
demonstrates a 25% or more 8 months 6 months
delay in that area of development. 9 months 7 months
10 months 8 months
A 24 month old who achieves
an age equivalent of 19 months
11 months 8 months
or greater demonstrates less than 12 months 9 months
a 25% delay. 15 months 11 months
18 months 14 months
21 months 16 months
24 months 18 months
27 months 21 months
30 months 23 months
33 months 25 months
36 months 27 months
Learning Activity
The DAYC was administered on May 5, 2006 for Donovan who was
born on 4/25/04. Use the sample Profile/Examiner Summary Sheet and
the 5 subtests included on pages 22-30 of this module:
Donovan is 24 months old, with at least a 25% delay in all areas as measured by the DAYC.
John can use at least five words, While communicating with his family, John is able
indicates ‘yes’ and ‘no’ in to point to what he wants and is able to name some
response to questions, and of his favorite objects. John is beginning to point
produces some 2-word phrases. to some body parts—his nose and eyes. He enjoys
He is not able to point to 6 body reading books and pointing to some objects on the
parts or point to 15 pictures of page. His family is working on remembering to
common objects. name things for him and encouraging him to repeat
them, throughout the day, when he is making
choices, and when he is making requests. His
favorite phrases are ‘bye-bye,’ ‘me go,’ and ‘uh-
oh.’ He needs more everyday practice to become
quicker with his responses.
Age at Evaluation:
Results:
Types of Assessment:
Name/Role:
Agency:
Age at Evaluation:
Results:
Types of Assessment:
Instrument:
Name/Role:
Agency:
34
Child’s Present Abilities, Strengths and Unique Needs
Social or Emotional Development (Engaging others and interacting in the environment)
Date of Evaluation:
Age at Evaluation:
Results:
Types of Assessment:
Name/Role:
Agency:
Age at Evaluation:
Results:
Types of Assessment:
Instrument:
Name/Role:
Agency:
35
Child’s Present Abilities, Strengths and Unique Needs
Adaptive Development (Self-help skills such as feeding, dressing, etc)
Date of Evaluation:
Age at Evaluation:
Results:
Types of Assessment:
Name/Role:
Agency:
36
6 References
Provence, S., Erikson, J., Vater, S., & Palmeri, S. (1995). Infant Toddler
Developmental Assessment, Chicago, Il: The Riverside Publishing Company.
http://jeffline.tju.edu/cfsrp/tlc/self-assignments.html