Affid of Personal and Mail Service
Affid of Personal and Mail Service
Affid of Personal and Mail Service
1. I am Petitioner in the action and I have first-hand knowledge to make this affidavit because
2. In fact, I am the only one amongst people involved in underlying action with standing and
first-hand knowledge able lawfully sign non-hearsay, admissible by law affidavits without
intention to mislead the court or judge, harass opponent, and without creating perjury and/or fraud
on the court.
harassing, fraudulent and frivolous litigation instituted by Wells Fargo from 2009 using 3 different
foreclosure mills.
5. Because of that, I was unable to hire licensed process servers to serve all 9 respondents and
I resorted to my friend’s help as common law process servers.
6. In addition, this affidavit saves my time, energy and money by avoiding the hustle of
obtaining individual affidavits of service from each of my friends because they all are busy,
7. My first common law, non-commercial process server, Nelli Frid, resides in Brooklyn,
9. Nelli Frid took a day off from her work and on March 4, 2019, she and I arrived at Office of
Woods Oviatt Gilman LLP located in Rochester, New York.
10. At 1:52 PM, with me present, she served 4 copies of the within ARTICLE 78 VERIFIED
PETITION UNDER DURESS on Donald W. O'Brien, Jr., attorney for respondents Woods Oviatt
Gilman LLP, Brettanie L. Hart Saxton, Esq., David B. Wildermuth, Esq., and Michael Thomas
Jablonski, Esq.
Sex: male; Height: 5’10”; Weight: 185; Age: 60; Skin color: white; Hair color: grey
12. He told us that because Victoria E. Munian, Esq. is no longer working for the company, he
is not going to represent her in this action. Mr. O'Brien took only four copies of said petition. He
Due to terrorist’s threats, United States Postal Service does not permit service of process
using mail prescribed by CPLR 308(2) without sender’s name and return address, which, if
written on envelope, would indicate that communication concerns an action against a person
to be served.
13. On March 5, 2019, at about 7:30 PM Elena Nabiouline and I, after 2 prior unsuccessful
attempts to serve Shmuel Taub, Esq. by hand delivery, delivered a copy of ARTICLE 78
VERIFIED PETITION UNDER DURESS to him per CPLR 307(2) at his law office, located at
VERIFIED PETITION UNDER DURESS to him per CPLR 307(2) at his residence. I presume,
this residence is registered with the BAR as place of business and/or service of process on attorney
practicing in New York. The front door has about 2-3 inches hole for mail delivery “drop off”
when attorney’s office is closed. Said copy of petition was placed there behind the front door.
15. On March 7, 2019, a copy of ARTICLE 78 VERIFIED PETITION UNDER DURESS was
delivered to the office of attorney general. Its agent, per CPLR 306(e), admitted service by
female employee who is authorized individual to accept the service of process and at which office.
She told me that Wells Fargo waives designation of authorized person to accept service and instead
chooses that any officer of any branch may accept legal papers.
17. On March 7, 2019, a copy of said petition was delivered to Shenell Welch, Wels Fargo
personal banker, at 463 Broadway, New York, New York. She admitted service of process by
signing and dating a copy of the front page of said petition, Exhibit C.
18. On March 7, 2019, I contacted by phone headquarters of US Bank, NA and asked female
employee who is authorized individual to accept the service of process and at which office. She
told me that US Bank, NA waives designation of authorized person to accept service and instead
chooses to accept legal papers by certified mail at specially designated address written below:
US Bank, NA
800 Nicollet Mal
BC-MN-H21N
Minneapolis, MN 55402