Report PDF

Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
Mail:abedaengineering@gmail.com
DESIGN REPORT
PREPARED BY: ABEDA ENGINEERING
(The Name You Can Trust)
RESIDENTIAL BUILDING
ROAD NO#63 HOUSE NO-3/A GULSHAN-2
Address: house # 1 f#4th, sabder hossain road, priyanka city, uttara, dhaka-1230.
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
6-Storey residential building
Design Review Report
Executive Summary
1. Site Observation:
As built drawing of the building and test result of the construction materials used in
the building was not available., a detail survey was performed by us to construct the
as built drawing of the building. Confirmatory strength assessment materials of
concrete, steel and scanning for reinforcement were also carried out.
3. Results & Materials Evaluation:

Sl. Item with Description Evaluated Remarks
No. Strength
AS per ACI-562
01. Concrete Compressive Strength for 1884psi As per Sample
collection
Column, & Beam f’c
02. Concrete Compressive Strength for 2556 psi As per Sample

collection
Slab, f’c
03. Steel Yield Strength, fy, 60,000 psi As per Sample
collection
4.Conclusions & Recommendation:
i) Building is not safe to continue operation (under BNBC-2006).
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
2.2 Computer Analysis
The building was modeled in three-dimensions using the program ETABS ver. 17
Computer model was produced to analyze the structural capacity and strength of
individual members to carry the prescribed loads. The wind and earthquake load
was calculated using the ETABS software’s in built function. Wind load has been
assigned as user defined function as per BNBC 2006 in FEM model.
2.3 Load & Load Combinations
The following load and load combinations were used to analyze the structure.
A) Seismic Load:
As per BNBC -2006 (2.5.1), Base Shear V = ZICW/R
Where, Seismic Zone Co-efficient, Z = 0.15 for zone 2 for Dhaka.
Importance factor, I = 1.0, C=1.25.S/T (2/3) , S = 1.5, T =
Ct(hn)(3/4) where, Ct =0.073 in SI for RC moment resisting frame,
R = 5 for Ordinary moment resisting RC frame ,
W = The Total seismic dead load.
B) Wind Load:
As per BNBC -2006(2.4.4.1) exposure category for this building is Exposure
A.
Sustained wind pressure, (KN/m2) qz = CcCiCzVb2
Where Ci = importance factor = 1.0
Cc = Velocity to pressure conversion = 47.2x10-6
Cz = Height and exposure co-efficient
Vb = Basic wind speed = 195km/h for Building Located in Narayangonj
Design wind pressure = CgCpqz where, Cg = Gust co-efficient,
Table (6.2.11) Cpx & Cpy from Table 6.2.15 of BNBC-2006
C) Dead Load :
a) Self-weight of structural members

b) Floor finish = 25 psf
c) 5”(125mm) Partition wall(Brick) = 500lb/ft (if the wall height 10’-0”)
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
d) 10”(250mm) Partition wall(Brick) = 1000lb/ft (if the wall height 10’-0”)
D) Live Load:
a) residential = 42 psf
b) Lift Core = 100 psf
c) Stair Case & Landing = 84 psf
E) Load Combination:
R.C. structural member will be designed to have strength not less than that required to resist the
most unfavorable effect of the combination of the factored loads shown below.
For RCC
1. 1.4DL
2. 1.4DL+1.7LL
3. 0.9DL+1.3WL
4. 0.9DL+1.43EQ
5. 1.05DL+1.275WL
6. 1.05DL+1.4025EQ
7. 1.05DL+1.275LL+1.275WL
8. 1.05DL+1.275LL+1.4025EQ
Where DL = Dead load, LL = Live load, WL = Wind load, EQ-Earth Quake Load.
Lr=Roof Live load, Lf=Floor live load.
3.0 Structural Assessment, Analysis and Outcome
3.1 Modeling
The structure was modeled in three-dimensions using the program ETABS ver. 17.0
with all existing and assumed information with a live load of 2.0 kN/m2. The
structural members were checked against gravity loading and lateral loading
respectively. The analysis outcomes are described in following sections.
3.2 Analysis Outcome
A) Physical Observation:
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
i) Distress or crack were observed in slab and column structural members of

the building. Diagonal cracks were observed in the slab. That’s why
detail calculations about foundation is not included in this report.
B) ETAB Results:
i) Most of Columns PMM Ratio >1.0

Columns:
Several are RCC Columns are found structural cracks and oxidation .
Floor Beam:
No structural or dangerous cracks or significant deflection were

detected. Beam are adequate under vertical load.
Slab:
Floor slabs are found to be adequate. Cantilever slab we found crack and most
oxidation.
Assigned loads in FEM model as-per BNBC-2006:
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
Fig: Live Load on Slab (42 psf)
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
Fig: Floor finish on Slab (25 psf)
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
PMM Ratio as-per BNBC-2006
Grid: 1
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
Grid: 2
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
Grid: 3
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
Grid: 4
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
Grid: 5
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
Grid: 6
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
Grid: 7
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
Grid: 8
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
Grid: 9
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
Grid: 10
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
Grid: 11
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
Grid: 12
Maximum column PMM >1.0, so this structure not adequate as-per BNBC-2006
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
Assigned loads in FEM model Consider minimum live load:
Fig: Live Load on Slab (20 psf)
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
PMM Ratio as-per SERVICE LOAD.(live load=20psf)
Grid: 1
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
Grid: 2
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
Grid: 3
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
Grid: 4
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
Grid: 5
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
Grid: 6
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
Grid: 7
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
Grid: 8
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
Grid: 9
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
Grid: 10
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
Grid: 11
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
Grid: 12
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
Most of the column PMM <1.0, only ONE column PMM >1 , and three column
show OVER STRESS , PROVIDED hand calculation. Structure as-per service
load
(LIVE LOAD=20psf)
GRID = (12-B) & (12-F)
Column Type=C1
PU=0.8*0.7*100(0.85*1.884+0.0192(60-0.85*1.884)) =152.5 kip
FEM value=105.3 kip
Pu>105.3
OK
GRID = (2-B)
Column Type=C4
PU=0.8*0.7*150(0.85*1.884+0.0192(60-0.85*1.884)) =228.7 kip
FEM value=294.4 kip
Pu<294.4
NOT OK
GRID = (7-G )
Column Type=C4
PU=0.8*0.7*150(0.85*1.884+0.0192(60-0.85*1.884)) =228.7 kip

FEM value=149.8 kip
Pu>149.8
OK
COMMENT: ONE COLUMN FAIL UNDER SERVICE LOAD.
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
PMM Ratio as-per SERVICE LOAD.(live load=42psf)
Grid: 1
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
Grid: 2
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
Grid: 3
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
Grid: 4
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
Grid: 5
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
Grid: 6
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
Grid: 7
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
Grid: 8
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
Grid: 9
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
Grid: 10
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
Grid: 11
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
Grid: 12
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
Most of the column PMM <1.0, SEVEN column PMM >1, and FOUR column
show OVER STRESS , PROVIDED hand calculation. Structure as-per service
load
(LIVE LOAD=42psf)
GRID = (12-B) & (12-F)
Column Type=C1
PU=0.8*0.7*100(0.85*1.884+0.0192(60-0.85*1.884)) =152.5 kip
FEM value=117.5 kip
Pu>117.5
OK
GRID = (2-B) & (2-F)
Column Type=C4
PU=0.8*0.7*150(0.85*1.884+0.0192(60-0.85*1.884)) =228.7 kip
FEM value=332 kip
Pu<332
NOT OK
GRID = (3-G)
Column Type=C4
PU=0.8*0.7*150(0.85*1.884+0.0192(60-0.85*1.884)) =228.7 kip
FEM value=202.92 kip

Pu>202.92
OK
GRID = (4-B)
Column Type=C4
PU=0.8*0.7*150(0.85*1.884+0.0192(60-0.85*1.884)) =228.7 kip

FEM value=208.73 kip
Pu>208.73
OK
GRID = (7-G)
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
Column Type=C4
PU=0.8*0.7*150(0.85*1.884+0.0192(60-0.85*1.884)) =228.7 kip
FEM value=164.5 kip
Pu>164.5 kip
OK
GRID = (8-F) & (8-B)
Column Type=C3
PU=0.8*0.7*200(0.85*1.884+0.024(60-0.85*1.884)) =336.33 kip
FEM value=356.8 kip
Pu<356.8 kip
NOT OK
GRID = (11-F) & (11-B)
Column Type=C1
PU=0.8*0.7*100(0.85*1.884+0.0192(60-0.85*1.884)) =152.5 kip
FEM value=142.6 kip
Pu>142.6
OK
COMMENT: FOUR COLUMN FAIL UNDER SERVICE LOAD.
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
Displacement check:
Fig: displacement EQX=1.92 inch
Fig: displacement EQY=2.13 inch
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
Fig: displacement WX=1.29 inch
Fig: displacement WY=3.22 inch
T = Ct(hn)(3/4
=0.073*(60/3.28)0.75=0.646sec
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
According to UBC 97
∆ <= 0.0025h for T <0 .7 second
∆ <= 0.0020h for T ≥0 .7 second
∆=(60*12)/400=2.5 inch
Allowable displacement =1.8 inch
Maximum displacement WY=3.22 inch <1.8inch
STRUCTURE IS NOT OK FOR DISPLACEMENT
RECOMMENDATION:
1. MOST OF THE COLUMN PMM ratio >1.0 ACCORDING TO BNBC-2006.
2. ONLY ONE COLUMN PMM ratio >1.0 ACCORDING TO SERVICE LOAD (LL=20psf).
3. FOUR COLUMN PMM ratio >1.0 ACCORDING TO SERVICE LOAD (LL=42psf).
4. STRUCTURAL DISPLACEMENT IS GRATHER THAN ALLOWABLE LIMIT.
5. FOUNDATION ARE NOT CHECK AS PER FIELD CONDITION.
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
ATTACH TEST REPORT:
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776
Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776

Report PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Report PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Report PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Mobile: +88-01723165130, +880‐1515294776

6-Storey residential building

Design Review Report

3. Results & Materials Evaluation:

02. Concrete Compressive Strength for 2556 psi As per Sample

4.Conclusions & Recommendation:

i) Building is not safe to continue operation (under BNBC-2006).

2.2 Computer Analysis

2.3 Load & Load Combinations

a) Self-weight of structural members

d) 10”(250mm) Partition wall(Brick) = 1000lb/ft (if the wall height 10’-0”)

3.0 Structural Assessment, Analysis and Outcome

3.2 Analysis Outcome

i) Distress or crack were observed in slab and column structural members of

i) Most of Columns PMM Ratio >1.0

No structural or dangerous cracks or significant deflection were

Assigned loads in FEM model as-per BNBC-2006:

Fig: Live Load on Slab (42 psf)

Fig: Floor finish on Slab (25 psf)

PMM Ratio as-per BNBC-2006

Assigned loads in FEM model Consider minimum live load:

Fig: Live Load on Slab (20 psf)

PMM Ratio as-per SERVICE LOAD.(live load=20psf)

PU=0.8*0.7*100(0.85*1.884+0.0192(60-0.85*1.884)) =152.5 kip

FEM value=105.3 kip

PU=0.8*0.7*150(0.85*1.884+0.0192(60-0.85*1.884)) =228.7 kip

FEM value=294.4 kip

PU=0.8*0.7*150(0.85*1.884+0.0192(60-0.85*1.884)) =228.7 kip

COMMENT: ONE COLUMN FAIL UNDER SERVICE LOAD.

PMM Ratio as-per SERVICE LOAD.(live load=42psf)

PU=0.8*0.7*100(0.85*1.884+0.0192(60-0.85*1.884)) =152.5 kip

FEM value=117.5 kip

GRID = (2-B) & (2-F)

PU=0.8*0.7*150(0.85*1.884+0.0192(60-0.85*1.884)) =228.7 kip

FEM value=332 kip

PU=0.8*0.7*150(0.85*1.884+0.0192(60-0.85*1.884)) =228.7 kip

FEM value=202.92 kip

PU=0.8*0.7*150(0.85*1.884+0.0192(60-0.85*1.884)) =228.7 kip

FEM value=164.5 kip

GRID = (8-F) & (8-B)

PU=0.8*0.7*200(0.85*1.884+0.024(60-0.85*1.884)) =336.33 kip

FEM value=356.8 kip

GRID = (11-F) & (11-B)

PU=0.8*0.7*100(0.85*1.884+0.0192(60-0.85*1.884)) =152.5 kip

FEM value=142.6 kip

COMMENT: FOUR COLUMN FAIL UNDER SERVICE LOAD.

Fig: displacement EQX=1.92 inch

Fig: displacement EQY=2.13 inch

Fig: displacement WX=1.29 inch

Fig: displacement WY=3.22 inch

∆ <= 0.0025h for T <0 .7 second

∆ <= 0.0020h for T ≥0 .7 second

ATTACH TEST REPORT:

You might also like

PU=0.80.7100(0.851.884+0.0192(60-0.851.884)) =152.5 kip

PU=0.80.7150(0.851.884+0.0192(60-0.851.884)) =228.7 kip

PU=0.80.7150(0.851.884+0.0192(60-0.851.884)) =228.7 kip

PU=0.80.7100(0.851.884+0.0192(60-0.851.884)) =152.5 kip

PU=0.80.7150(0.851.884+0.0192(60-0.851.884)) =228.7 kip

PU=0.80.7150(0.851.884+0.0192(60-0.851.884)) =228.7 kip

PU=0.80.7150(0.851.884+0.0192(60-0.851.884)) =228.7 kip

PU=0.80.7200(0.851.884+0.024(60-0.851.884)) =336.33 kip

PU=0.80.7100(0.851.884+0.0192(60-0.851.884)) =152.5 kip