ANNEX 5

Treatment methods and performance

A5.1 Treatment methods

A5.1.1 Chlorination
Chlorination can be achieved by using liquefied chlorine gas, sodium hypochlorite
solution or calcium hypochlorite granules and on-site chlorine generators. Lique-
fied chlorine gas is supplied in pressurized containers. The gas is withdrawn from the
cylinder and dosed into water by a chlorinator, which both controls and measures the
gas flow rate. Sodium hypochlorite solution is dosed using a positive-displacement
electric dosing pump or gravity feed system. Calcium hypochlorite has to be dissolved
in water, then mixed with the main supply. Chlorine, whether in the form of chlorine
gas from a cylinder, sodium hypochlorite or calcium hypochlorite, dissolves in water
to form hypochlorous acid (HOCl) and hypochlorite ion (OCl−).
Different techniques of chlorination can be used, including breakpoint chlorina-
tion, marginal chlorination and superchlorination/dechlorination. Breakpoint chlor-
ination is a method in which the chlorine dose is sufficient to rapidly oxidize all the
ammonia nitrogen in the water and to leave a suitable free residual chlorine available to
protect the water against reinfection from the point of chlorination to the point of use.
Superchlorination/dechlorination is the addition of a large dose of chlorine to effect
rapid disinfection and chemical reaction, followed by reduction of excess free chlorine
residual. Removing excess chlorine is important to prevent taste problems. It is used
mainly when the bacterial load is variable or the detention time in a tank is not enough.
Marginal chlorination is used where water supplies are of high quality and is the simple
dosing of chlorine to produce a desired level of free residual chlorine. The chlorine
demand in these supplies is very low, and a breakpoint might not even occur.
Chlorination is employed primarily for microbial disinfection. However, chlorine
also acts as an oxidant and can remove or assist in the removal or chemical conversion
of some chemicals—for example, decomposition of easily oxidized pesticides, such as
aldicarb; oxidation of dissolved species (e.g. manganese(II)) to form insoluble prod-
ucts that can be removed by subsequent filtration; and oxidation of dissolved species
to more easily removable forms (e.g. arsenite to arsenate).

485
 GUIDELINES FOR DRINKING-WATER QUALITY

A disadvantage of chlorine is its ability to react with natural organic matter to

produce trihalomethanes and other halogenated disinfection by-products. However,
by-product formation may be controlled by optimization of the treatment system.

A5.1.2 Ozonation
Ozone is a powerful oxidant and has many uses in water treatment, including oxidation
of organic chemicals. Ozone can be used as a primary disinfectant. Ozone gas (O3) is
formed by passing dry air or oxygen through a high-voltage electric field. The result-
ant ozone-enriched air is dosed directly into the water by means of porous diffusers
at the base of baffled contactor tanks. The contactor tanks, typically about 5 m deep,
provide 10–20 minutes of contact time. Dissolution of at least 80% of the applied
ozone should be possible, with the remainder contained in the off-gas, which is passed
through an ozone destructor and vented to the atmosphere.
The performance of ozonation relies on achieving the desired concentration after
a given contact period. For oxidation of organic chemicals, such as some oxidizable
pesticides, a residual of about 0.5 mg/l after a contact time of up to 20 minutes is
typically used. The doses required to achieve this vary with the type of water but are
typically in the range 2–5 mg/l. Higher doses are needed for untreated waters, because
of the ozone demand of the natural background organics.
Ozone reacts with natural organics to increase their biodegradability, measured
as assimilable organic carbon. To avoid undesirable bacterial growth in distribution,
ozonation is normally used with subsequent treatment, such as biological filtration
or granular activated carbon (GAC), to remove biodegradable organics, followed by a
chlorine residual, as ozone does not provide a disinfectant residual. Ozone is effective
for the degradation of a wide range of pesticides and other organic chemicals.

A5.1.3 Other disinfection processes

Other disinfection methods include chloramination, the use of chlorine dioxide and
UV radiation, as well as alternative disinfection techniques that may be used in small-
er-scale applications, such as for household water.
Chloramines (monochloramine, dichloramine and trichloramine, or nitrogen
trichloride) are produced by the reaction of aqueous chlorine with ammonia. Mono-
chloramine is the only useful chloramine disinfectant, and conditions employed for
chloramination are designed to produce only monochloramine. Monochloramine is
a less effective disinfectant than free chlorine, but it is persistent, and it is therefore an
attractive secondary disinfectant for the maintenance of a stable distribution system
residual.
Chlorine dioxide has been used in recent years because of concerns about disinfec-
tion by-product production associated with chlorine disinfection. Typically, chlorine
dioxide is generated immediately prior to application by the addition of chlorine gas
or an aqueous chlorine solution to aqueous sodium chlorite. Chlorine dioxide decom-
poses in water to form chlorite and chlorate.
UV radiation, emitted by a low-pressure or medium-pressure mercury arc lamp,
is biocidal between wavelengths of 180 and 320 nm. It can be used to inactivate proto-
zoa, bacteria, bacteriophage, yeast, viruses, fungi and algae. Turbidity can inhibit UV

486
 ANNEX 5. TREATMENT METHODS AND PERFORMANCE

disinfection. UV radiation can act as a catalyst in oxidation reactions when used in

conjunction with ozone or hydrogen peroxide.
Numerous possible disinfection techniques are being developed and are typically
used in smaller-scale applications, such as household point-of-use and point-of-entry
water treatment systems. Some of these, including bromine and iodine, show prom-
ise for expanded use. Bromine and iodine are halogens, like chlorine, and they are
well-known biocides. Iodine is commonly used for short-term applications, such as by
travellers in areas where water quality is questionable. Some forms of silver may have
applications as bacteriostats or possibly as slow-acting disinfectants for some micro-
organisms; however, there are not good peer-reviewed published data to quantify the
latter. It will be necessary to develop a more thorough analysis of the biocidal efficacy,
potential disinfection by-products and risks from long-term exposures and applica-
tion conditions for these lesser-used treatment chemicals to provide appropriate guid-
ance as to their potential for wider applications.

A5.1.4 Filtration
Particulate matter can be removed from raw waters by rapid gravity, horizontal, pres-
sure or slow sand filters. Slow sand filtration is essentially a biological process, whereas
the others are physical treatment processes.
Rapid gravity, horizontal and pressure filters can be used for filtration of raw
water, without pretreatment. Rapid gravity and pressure filters are commonly used
to filter water that has been pretreated by coagulation and sedimentation. An alterna-
tive process is direct filtration, in which coagulation is added to the water, which then
passes directly onto the filter where the precipitated floc (with contaminants) is re-
moved; the application of direct filtration is limited by the available storage within the
filter to accommodate solids.
Rapid gravity filters
Rapid gravity sand filters usually consist of open rectangular tanks (usually < 100 m2)
containing silica sand (size range 0.5–1.0 mm) to a depth of between 0.6 and 2.0 m.
The water flows downwards, and solids become concentrated in the upper layers of
the bed. The flow rate is generally in the range 4–20 m3/m2·h. Treated water is collected
via nozzles in the floor of the filter. The accumulated solids are removed periodically
by backwashing with treated water, sometimes preceded by scouring of the sand with
air. A dilute sludge that requires disposal is produced.
In addition to single-medium sand filters, dual-media or multimedia filters are
used. Such filters incorporate different materials, such that the structure is from coarse
to fine as the water passes through the filter. Materials of suitable density are used in
order to maintain the segregation of the different layers following backwashing. A
common example of a dual-media filter is the anthracite–sand filter, which typically
consists of a 0.2 m deep layer of 1.5 mm anthracite over a 0.6 m deep layer of silica
sand. Anthracite, sand and garnet can be used in multimedia filters. The advantage
of dual-media and multimedia filters is that there is more efficient use of the whole
bed depth for particle retention—the rate of headloss development can be half that of

487
 GUIDELINES FOR DRINKING-WATER QUALITY

single-medium filters, which can allow higher flow rates without increasing headloss
development.
Rapid gravity filters are most commonly used to remove floc from coagulated
waters (see section A5.1.6). They may also be used to reduce turbidity (including
adsorbed chemicals) and oxidized iron and manganese from raw waters.
Roughing filters
Roughing filters can be applied as pre-filters prior to other processes such as slow sand
filters. Roughing filters with coarse gravel or crushed stones as the filter medium can
successfully treat water of high turbidity (> 50 nephelometric turbidity units). The
main advantage of roughing filtration is that as the water passes through the filter,
particles are removed by both filtration and gravity settling. Horizontal filters can be
up to 10 m long and are operated at filtration rates of 0.3–1.0 m3/m2·h.
Pressure filters
Pressure filters are sometimes used where it is necessary to maintain head in order to
eliminate the need for pumping into supply. The filter bed is enclosed in a cylindrical
shell. Small pressure filters, capable of treating up to about 15 m3/h, can be manufac-
tured in glass-reinforced plastics. Larger pressure filters, up to 4 m in diameter, are
manufactured in specially coated steel. Operation and performance are generally as
described for the rapid gravity filter, and similar facilities are required for backwashing
and disposal of the dilute sludge.

Slow sand filters

Slow sand filters usually consist of tanks containing sand (effective size range 0.15–0.3
mm) to a depth of between 0.5 and 1.5 m. The raw water flows downwards, and tur-
bidity and microorganisms are removed primarily in the top few centimetres of the
sand. A biological layer, known as the “schmutzdecke”, develops on the surface of the
filter and can be effective in removing microorganisms. Treated water is collected in
underdrains or pipework at the bottom of the filter. The top few centimetres of sand
containing the accumulated solids are removed and replaced periodically. Slow sand
filters are operated at a water flow rate of between 0.1 and 0.3 m3/m2·h.
Slow sand filters are more suitable for low-turbidity water or water that has been
pre-filtered. They are used to remove algae and microorganisms, including protozoa,
and, if preceded by microstraining or coarse filtration, to reduce turbidity (including
adsorbed chemicals). Slow sand filtration is effective for the removal of some organics,
including certain pesticides and also ammonia.
Bank filtration
Bank filtration is a process that produces an influx of surface water through the ground-
water, via the bed and banks of the surface water body. This is commonly achieved
through abstraction from boreholes adjacent to the surface water source. It is a rela-
tively simple and low-cost means for removing particulates and microorganisms from
surface water by placing pumping wells in alluvial sediments of the river or stream
banks. The sediments act as both a filter and biofilter, trapping and reducing the con-
centrations of microorganisms and many organic pollutants. Bank filtration wells can

488
 ANNEX 5. TREATMENT METHODS AND PERFORMANCE

be either horizontal or vertical, depending upon the hydrogeological circumstances

and required production rate. Horizontal wells are often used where alluvial deposits
are shallow or where high pumping rates are required.
Bank filtration can remove particles, bacteria, viruses, parasites, heavy metals and
easily biodegradable compounds. Bank filtration attenuates concentration peaks, pro-
viding uniform quality of raw water feed to downstream treatment. The performance
of bank filtration can be highly dependent upon several factors, including soil and
geological conditions as well as the quality of the source water. Bank filters can be-
come clogged, resulting in pressure drops. Site-specific testing is needed to determine
whether the appropriate geology is present as well as the effectiveness and operational
parameters.

A5.1.5 Aeration
Aeration processes are designed to achieve removal of gases and volatile compounds
by air stripping. Transfer can usually be achieved using a simple cascade or diffusion
of air into water, without the need for elaborate equipment. Stripping of gases or vola-
tile compounds, however, may require a specialized plant that provides a high degree
of mass transfer from the liquid phase to the gas phase.
Cascade or step aerators are designed so that water flows in a thin film to achieve
efficient mass transfer. Cascade aeration may introduce a significant headloss; de-
sign requirements are between 1 and 3 m to provide a loading of 10–30 m3/m2·h.
Alternatively, compressed air can be diffused through a system of submerged perfor-
ated pipes. These types of aerator are used for oxidation and precipitation of iron and
manganese.
Air stripping can be used for removal of volatile organics (e.g. solvents), some
taste- and odour-causing compounds and radon. Aeration processes to achieve air
stripping need to be much more elaborate to provide the necessary contact between
the air and water. The most common technique is cascade aeration, usually in packed
towers in which water is allowed to flow in thin films over plastic media with air blown
counter-current. The required tower height and diameter are functions of the volatil-
ity and concentration of the compounds to be removed and the flow rate. Increas-
ing the dissolved oxygen content of a water can increase its corrosivity towards some
metallic materials used in distribution pipes and plumbing, and this should be taken
into account when considering aeration as a treatment process.

A5.1.6 Chemical coagulation

Chemical coagulation-based treatment is the most common approach for treatment
of surface waters and is almost always based on the following unit processes.
Chemical coagulants, usually salts of aluminium or iron, are dosed to the raw
water under controlled conditions to form a solid flocculent metal hydroxide. Typical
coagulant doses are 2–5 mg/l as aluminium or 4–10 mg/l as iron. The precipitated floc
removes suspended and dissolved contaminants by mechanisms of charge neutraliza-
tion, adsorption and entrapment. The efficiency of the coagulation process depends
on raw water quality, the coagulant or coagulant aids used and operational factors,
including mixing conditions, coagulation dose and pH. The floc is removed from the

489
 GUIDELINES FOR DRINKING-WATER QUALITY

treated water by subsequent solid–liquid separation processes such as sedimentation

or flotation and/or rapid or pressure gravity filtration.
Effective operation of the coagulation process depends on selection of the opti-
mum coagulant dose and also the pH value. The required dose and pH can be deter-
mined by using small-scale batch coagulation tests, often termed “jar tests”. Increasing
doses of coagulant are applied to raw water samples that are stirred and allowed to
settle. The optimum dose is selected as that which achieves adequate removal of col-
our and turbidity; the optimum pH can be selected in a similar manner. These tests
have to be conducted at a sufficient frequency to keep pace with changes in raw water
quality and hence coagulant demand.
Powdered activated carbon (PAC) may be dosed during coagulation to adsorb
organic chemicals, such as some hydrophobic pesticides. The PAC will be removed as
an integral fraction of the floc and disposed of with the waterworks sludge.
The floc may be removed by sedimentation to reduce the solids loading to the
subsequent rapid gravity filters. Sedimentation is most commonly achieved in hori-
zontal flow or floc blanket clarifiers. Alternatively, floc may be removed by dissolved
air flotation, in which solids are contacted with fine bubbles of air that attach to the
floc, causing them to float to the surface of the tank, where they are removed periodic-
ally as a layer of sludge. The treated water from either process is passed to rapid gravity
filters (see section A5.1.4), where remaining solids are removed. Filtered water may be
passed to a further stage of treatment, such as additional oxidation and filtration (for
removal of manganese), ozonation and/or GAC adsorption (for removal of pesticides
and other trace organics), prior to final disinfection before the treated water enters
the supply.
Coagulation is suitable for removal of particulates and bound microorganisms,
certain heavy metals and low-solubility organic chemicals, such as certain organo-
chlorine pesticides. For other organic chemicals, coagulation is generally ineffective,
except where the chemical is bound to humic material or adsorbed onto particulates.

A5.1.7 Activated carbon adsorption

Activated carbon is produced by the controlled thermalization of carbonaceous ma-
terial, normally wood, coal, coconut shells or peat. This activation produces a porous
material with a large surface area (500–1500 m2/g) and a high affinity for organic com-
pounds. It is normally used in either powdered (PAC) or granular (GAC) form. When
the adsorption capacity of the carbon is exhausted, it can be reactivated by burning off
the organics in a controlled manner. However, PAC (and some GAC) is normally used
only once before disposal. Different types of activated carbon have different affinities
for types of contaminants.
The choice between PAC and GAC will depend upon the relative cost-effective-
ness, frequency and dose required. PAC would generally be preferred in the case of
seasonal or intermittent contamination or where low dosage rates are required.
PAC is dosed as a slurry into the water and removed by subsequent treatment
processes, together with the waterworks sludge. Its use is therefore restricted to surface
water treatment works with existing filters. GAC in fixed-bed adsorbers is used much
more efficiently than PAC dosed into the water, and the effective carbon use per water

490
 ANNEX 5. TREATMENT METHODS AND PERFORMANCE

volume treated would be much lower than the dose of PAC required to achieve the
same removal.
GAC is used for taste and odour control. It is normally used in fixed beds, either
in purpose-built adsorbers for chemicals or in existing filter shells by replacement of
sand with GAC of a similar particle size. Although at most treatment works it would be
cheaper to convert existing filters rather than build separate adsorbers, use of existing
filters usually allows only short contact times, and they are not capable of facile reacti-
vation. It is therefore common practice to install additional GAC adsorbers (in some
cases preceded by ozonation) between the rapid gravity filters and final disinfection.
Most groundwater sources do not have existing filters, and separate adsorbers would
need to be installed.
The service life of a GAC bed is dependent on the capacity of the carbon used
and the contact time between the water and the carbon, the empty bed contact time,
controlled by the flow rate of the water. Empty bed contact times are usually in the
range 5–30 minutes. GACs vary considerably in their capacity for specific organic
compounds, which can have a significant effect upon their service life. A guide to
capacity can be obtained from published isotherm data. Carbon capacity is strongly
dependent on the water source and is greatly reduced by the presence of background
organic compounds. The properties of a chemical that influence its adsorption onto
activated carbon include the water solubility and octanol–water partition coefficient.
As a general rule, chemicals with low solubilities and high log octanol–water partition
coefficients are well adsorbed.
Activated carbon is used for the removal of pesticides and other organic chem-
icals, taste and odour compounds, cyanobacterial toxins and total organic carbon.

A5.1.8 Ion exchange

Ion exchange is a process in which ions of like charge are exchanged between the water
phase and the solid resin phase. Water softening is achieved by cation exchange. Water
is passed through a bed of cationic resin, and the calcium ions and magnesium ions in
the water are replaced by sodium ions. When the ion exchange resin is exhausted (i.e.
the sodium ions are depleted), it is regenerated using a solution of sodium chloride.
The process of “dealkalization” can also soften water. Water is passed through a bed
of weakly acidic resin, and the calcium and magnesium ions are replaced by hydrogen
ions. The hydrogen ions react with the carbonate and bicarbonate ions to produce car-
bon dioxide. The hardness of the water is thus reduced without any increase in sodium
levels. Anion exchange can be used to remove contaminants such as nitrate, fluoride,
arsenate and uranium (as the uranyl anion), which are exchanged for chloride. Several
appropriate resins are available for this purpose.
An ion exchange plant normally consists of two or more resin beds contained in
pressure shells with appropriate pumps, pipework and ancillary equipment for re-
generation. The pressure shells are typically up to 4 m in diameter, containing 0.6–1.5
m depth of resin.
Cation exchange can be used for removal of certain heavy metals. Potential ap-
plications of anionic resins, in addition to nitrate removal, are for removal of arsenic
and selenium species.

491
 GUIDELINES FOR DRINKING-WATER QUALITY

A5.1.9 Membrane processes

The membrane processes of most significance in water treatment are reverse osmosis,
ultrafiltration, microfiltration and nanofiltration. These processes have traditionally
been applied to the production of water for industrial or pharmaceutical applications,
but are now being applied to the treatment of drinking-water.

High-pressure processes
If two solutions are separated by a semipermeable membrane (i.e. a membrane that
allows the passage of the solvent but not of the solute), the solvent will naturally pass
from the lower-concentration solution to the higher-concentration solution. This
process is known as osmosis. It is possible, however, to force the flow of solvent in the
opposite direction, from the higher to the lower concentration, by increasing the pres-
sure on the higher-concentration solution. The required pressure differential is known
as the osmotic pressure, and the process is known as reverse osmosis.
Reverse osmosis results in the production of a treated water stream and a rela-
tively concentrated waste stream. Typical operating pressures are in the range 15–50
bar, depending on the application. Reverse osmosis rejects monovalent ions and or-
ganics of molecular weight greater than about 50 daltons (membrane pore sizes are
less than 0.002 µm). The most common application of reverse osmosis is desalination
of brackish water and seawater.
Nanofiltration uses a membrane with properties between those of reverse osmosis
and ultrafiltration membranes; pore sizes are typically 0.001–0.01 µm. Nanofiltration
membranes allow monovalent ions such as sodium or potassium to pass but reject a
high proportion of divalent ions such as calcium and magnesium and some higher
molecular weight organics. Operating pressures are typically about 5 bar. Nanofiltra-
tion may be effective for the removal of colour-forming organic compounds.
Lower-pressure processes
Ultrafiltration is similar in principle to reverse osmosis, but the membranes have much
larger pore sizes (typically 0.002–0.03 µm) and operate at lower pressures. Ultrafiltra-
tion membranes reject organic molecules of molecular weight above about 800 dal-
tons and usually operate at pressures less than 5 bar.
Microfiltration is a direct extension of conventional filtration into the sub-
micrometre range. Microfiltration membranes have pore sizes typically in the range
0.01–12 µm and do not separate molecules but reject colloidal and suspended material
at operating pressures of 1–2 bar. Microfiltration is capable of sieving out particles
greater than 0.05 µm. It has been used for water treatment in combination with co-
agulation or PAC to remove particulates and some dissolved organic carbon prior to
reverse osmosis membranes and to improve permeate flux.

A5.1.10 Other treatment processes

Processes aimed at generating hydroxyl radicals are known collectively as advanced
oxidation processes and can be effective for the destruction of chemicals that are dif-
ficult to treat using other methods, such as ozone alone. Hydrogen peroxide with UV
is also a source of hydroxyl radicals. Chemicals can react either directly with molecular

492
 ANNEX 5. TREATMENT METHODS AND PERFORMANCE

ozone or with the hydroxyl radical (HO·), which is a product of the decomposition
of ozone in water and is an exceedingly powerful indiscriminate oxidant that reacts
readily with a wide range of organic chemicals. The formation of hydroxyl radicals
can be encouraged by using ozone at high pH. One advanced oxidation process using
ozone or UV plus hydrogen peroxide involves dosing hydrogen peroxide simultan-
eously with ozone at a rate of approximately 0.4 mg of hydrogen peroxide per litre per
milligram of ozone dosed per litre (the theoretical optimum ratio for hydroxyl radical
production) and bicarbonate.
Other treatment processes that can be used in certain applications include:
v precipitation softening (addition of lime, lime plus sodium carbonate or sodium
hydroxide to precipitate hardness at high pH);
v ion exchange softening;
v biological denitrification for removal of nitrate from surface waters;
v biological nitrification for removal of ammonia from surface waters;
v activated alumina (or other adsorbents) for specialized applications, such as
removal of fluoride and arsenic.

A5.2 Treatment performance for chemicals for which guideline

values have been established
Treatment performance for chemicals for which guideline values have been estab-
lished is given in Tables A5.1–A5.5.

A5.3 Corrosion of metals used in water treatment and distribution

A5.3.1 Brass
The main corrosion problem with brasses is dezincification, which is the selective dis-
solution of zinc from duplex brass, leaving behind copper as a porous mass of low
mechanical strength. Meringue dezincification, in which a voluminous corrosion
product of basic zinc carbonate forms on the brass surface, largely depends on the
ratio of chloride to alkalinity. Meringue dezincification can be controlled by main-
taining a low zinc to copper ratio (1:3 or lower) and by keeping pH below 8.3.
General dissolution of brass can also occur, releasing metals, including lead, into
the water. Impingement attack can occur under conditions of high water velocity with
waters that form poorly protective corrosion product layers and that contain large
amounts of dissolved or entrained air.

A5.3.2 Concrete and cement

Concrete is a composite material consisting of a cement binder in which an inert ag-
gregate is embedded. Cement is primarily a mixture of calcium silicates and alumin-
ates together with some free lime. Cement mortar, in which the aggregate is fine sand,
is used as a protective lining in iron and steel water pipes. In asbestos–cement pipe, the
aggregate is asbestos fibres, which are not of concern in drinking-water (see also asbes-
tos fact sheet in chapter 12). Cement is subject to deterioration on prolonged exposure
to aggressive water, due either to the dissolution of lime and other soluble compounds

493
 Table A5.1 Treatment performance for naturally occurring chemicals for which guideline values have been establisheda,b

Chlorination Coagulation Ion exchange Precipitation softening Activated alumina Activated carbon Ozonation Membranes
Arsenicc ++ +++ ++ +++ +++d
<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005
Fluoride ++ +++ +++
<1 <1
Selenium ++ +++ +++ +++
<0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Uranium ++ +++ ++ +++
<0.001 <0.001
a
Symbols are as follows:
++ Approximately 50% or more removal
+++ Approximately 80% or more removal
b
The table includes chemicals for which some treatment data are available. A blank entry in the table indicates either that the process is completely ineffective or that there are no data on

494
the effectiveness of the process. For the most effective processes, the table estimates the concentration of the chemical (in mg/l) that could be achievable in an ideal water.
c
Iron oxide–based and iron hydroxide–based media have been shown to be very effective for both arsenate and arsenite forms.
d
Reverse osmosis membranes are more effective for removal of arsenate than arsenite. However, arsenite is readily oxidized to arsenate by disinfectants (e.g. chlorine).
GUIDELINES FOR DRINKING-WATER QUALITY
 Table A5.2 Treatment performance for chemicals from industrial sources and human dwellings for which guideline values have been establisheda,b

UV
Air Ion Precipitation Activated Advanced Biological irradia-
stripping Coagulation exchange softening carbon Ozonation oxidation Membranes treatmentc tion
Cadmium +++ +++ +++ +++
<0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002
Mercury +++ +++ +++ +++
<0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
Benzene +++ +++ +++
<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 Yesd
Carbon tetrachloride +++ +++ +
<0.001 <0.001
1,2-Dichlorobenzene +++ +++ +++ Yesd
<0.01 <0.01 <0.01

495
1,4-Dichlorobenzene +++ +++ +++ Yesd
<0.01 <0.01 <0.01
1,2-Dichloroethane +++ +++ +
<0.01
1,2-Dichloroethene +++ +++ +++
<0.01 <0.01 <0.01
1,4-Dioxane + +++
ANNEX 5. TREATMENT METHODS AND PERFORMANCE

0.05
Edetic acid +++
<0.01
Ethylbenzene ++ + +++ +++ ++ + ++
<0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Hexachlorobutadiene +++ +
<0.001
 Table A5.2 (continued)

UV
Air Ion Precipitation Activated Advanced Biological irradia-
stripping Coagulation exchange softening carbon Ozonation oxidation Membranes treatmentc tion
Nitrilotriacetic acid ++ ++
N-Nitrosodimethylamine + ++ +
Pentachlorophenol +++ ++
<0.0004
Styrene +++ +++ ++ + +
<0.02 <0.002
Tetrachloroethene +++ +++ +
<0.001 <0.001
Toluene +++ +++ +++ +++e ++
<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

496
Trichloroethene +++ +++ +++ +++e
<0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02
Xylenes +++ +++ +++e ++
<0.005 <0.005 <0.005
a
Symbols are as follows:
+ Limited removal
GUIDELINES FOR DRINKING-WATER QUALITY

++ Approximately 50% or more removal

+++ Approximately 80% or more removal
b
The table includes only those chemicals for which some treatment data are available. A blank entry in the table indicates either that the process is completely ineffective or that there
are no data on the effectiveness of the process. For the most effective processes, where data are available, the table indicates the concentration of the chemical (in mg/l) that should be
achievable.
c
Biological treatment includes slow sand filtration and bank filtration.
d
Yes means known or likely to be effective, but performance was not quantified.
e
Might be effective, but other techniques would be more likely to be applied due to cost.
 Table A5.3 Treatment performance for chemicals from agricultural activities for which guideline values have been establisheda,b

Ion Activated Advanced Biological

Chlorination Air stripping Coagulation exchange carbon Ozonation oxidation Membranes treatmentc
Nitrate +++ +++ +++
<5 <5 <5
Nitrite +++ + +++
<0.1
Alachlor +++ ++ +++ +++
<0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Aldicarb +++ +++ +++
<0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Aldrin/dieldrin + +++ ++ +++
<0.000 02 <0.000 02 <0.000 02
Atrazine and its chloro-s- + +++ Yesd +++ +++ +++e

497
triazine metabolites <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
Carbofuran + +++ Yesd +++
<0.001 <0.001
Chlordane +++ ++ Yesd
<0.0001 <0.0001
Chlorotoluron +++ +++
<0.0001 <0.0001
ANNEX 5. TREATMENT METHODS AND PERFORMANCE

Cyanazine +++ + +++

<0.0001 <0.0001
2,4-D +++ +++ Yesd
<0.001 <0.001
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ++ +++
<0.001 <0.0001
 Table A5.3 (continued)

Ion Activated Advanced Biological

Chlorination Air stripping Coagulation exchange carbon Ozonation oxidation Membranes treatmentc
1,2-Dibromoethane +++ +++
<0.0001 <0.0001
1,2-Dichloropropane Yes +++ +
<0.001
Dimethoate +++ ++ ++
<0.001
Endrin + +++ Yesd
<0.0002
Hydroxyatrazine +++ Yesd
<0.001
Isoproturon ++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +

498
<0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
Lindane +++ ++ Yesd ++
<0.0001
MCPA +++ +++ Yesd
<0.0001 <0.0001
Mecoprop +++ +++ +++
GUIDELINES FOR DRINKING-WATER QUALITY

<0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001

Methoxychlor ++ +++ +++ Yesd
<0.0001 <0.0001
Metalochlor +++ ++ Yesd ++
<0.0001
Simazine +++ ++ +++ +++
<0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
 Table A5.3 (continued)

Ion Activated Advanced Biological

Chlorination Air stripping Coagulation exchange carbon Ozonation oxidation Membranes treatmentc
2,4,5-T +++ Yesd
<0.001
Terbuthylazine + +++ ++
<0.0001
Trifluralin +++ +++f
<0.0001 <0.0001
a
Symbols are as follows:
+ Limited removal
++ Approximately 50% or more removal
+++ Approximately 80% or more removal
b
The table includes only those chemicals for which some treatment data are available. A blank entry in the table indicates either that the process is completely ineffective or that there are
no data on the effectiveness of the process. For the most effective processes, the table indicates the concentration of the chemical (in mg/l) that should be achievable.
c
Biological treatment includes slow sand filtration, bank filtration and biological denitrification (for nitrate removal).

499
d
Yes means known or likely to be effective, but performance was not quantified.
e
For bank filtration; slow sand filtration is not effective.
f
Might be effective, but other techniques would be more likely to be applied due to cost.
ANNEX 5. TREATMENT METHODS AND PERFORMANCE
 Table A5.4 Treatment performance for pesticides used in water for public health for which guideline values have been establisheda,b

Chlorination Coagulation Activated carbon Ozonation Advanced oxidation Membranes

DDT and metabolites + +++ + +++c +++c

<0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
a
Symbols are as follows:
+ Limited removal
+++ Approximately 80% or more removal
b
For the most effective processes, the table indicates the concentration of the chemical (in mg/l) that should be achievable.
c
Might be effective, but other techniques would be more likely to be applied due to cost.

Table A5.5 Treatment performance for cyanobacterial cells and cyanotoxins for which guideline values have been establisheda,b,c

Chlorination Coagulation Activated carbon Ozonation Advanced oxidation Membranes Biological treatmentd

Cyanobacterial cells +++ +++

500
Cyanotoxins +++ +++ +++ +++ +++
a
Chlorination or ozonation may release cyanotoxins.
b
+++ = 80% or more removal.
c
The table includes only those chemicals for which some treatment data are available. A blank entry in the table indicates either that the process is completely ineffective or that
there are no data on the effectiveness of the process.
d
Biological treatment includes slow sand filtration and bank filtration.
GUIDELINES FOR DRINKING-WATER QUALITY
 ANNEX 5. TREATMENT METHODS AND PERFORMANCE

or to chemical attack by aggressive ions such as chloride or sulfate, and this may result
in structural failure. Newly installed cement materials will leach lime, with consequent
increases in pH, alkalinity and hardness. Cement contains a variety of metals that
can be leached into the water. Aggressiveness to cement is related to the “aggressivity
index”, which has been used specifically to assess the potential for the dissolution of
concrete. A pH of 8.5 or higher may be necessary to control cement corrosion.

A5.3.3 Copper
The corrosion of copper pipework and hot water cylinders can cause blue water, blue
or green staining of bathroom fittings and, occasionally, taste problems. Copper tub-
ing may be subject to general corrosion, impingement attack and pitting corrosion.
General corrosion is most often associated with soft, acidic waters; waters with
pH below 6.5 and hardness of less than 60 mg of calcium carbonate per litre are very
aggressive to copper. Copper, like lead, can enter water by dissolution of the corrosion
product, basic copper carbonate. The solubility is mainly a function of pH and total
inorganic carbon. Solubility decreases with increase in pH, but increases with increase
in concentrations of carbonate species. Raising the pH to between 8 and 8.5 is the
usual procedure to overcome these difficulties.
Impingement attack is the result of excessive flow velocities and is aggravated in
soft water at high temperature and low pH.
The pitting of copper is commonly associated with hard groundwaters having a
carbon dioxide concentration above 5 mg/l and high dissolved oxygen. Phosphates
have been used to suppress copper corrosion in those cases. Surface waters with
organic colour may also be associated with pitting corrosion. Copper pipes can fail by
pitting corrosion, which involves highly localized attacks leading to perforations with
negligible loss of metal. Two main types of attack are recognized. Type I pitting affects
cold water systems (below 40 °C) and is associated, particularly, with hard borehole
waters and the presence of a carbon film in the bore of the pipe, derived from the
manufacturing process. Tubes that have had the carbon removed by cleaning are im-
mune from Type I pitting. Type II pitting occurs in hot water systems (above 60 °C)
and is associated with soft waters. A high proportion of general and pitting corrosion
problems are associated with new pipe in which a protective oxide layer has not yet
formed. Calcium carbonate precipitation indices such as Langelier and Ryznar are not
good predictors of corrosion for copper systems.

A5.3.4 Iron
Iron (either cast or ductile) is frequently used in water distribution systems, and its
corrosion is of concern. While structural failure as a result of iron corrosion is rare,
water quality problems (e.g. “red water”) can arise as a result of excessive corrosion of
iron pipes. The corrosion of iron is a complex process that involves the oxidation of
the metal, normally by dissolved oxygen, ultimately to form a precipitate of iron(III).
This leads to the formation of tubercules on the pipe surface. The major water qual-
ity factors that determine whether the precipitate forms a protective scale are pH and
alkalinity. The concentrations of calcium, chloride and sulfate also influence iron cor-
rosion. Successful control of iron corrosion has been achieved by adjusting the pH to

501
 GUIDELINES FOR DRINKING-WATER QUALITY

the range 6.8–7.3, hardness and alkalinity to at least 40 mg/l (as calcium carbonate),
oversaturation with calcium carbonate of 4–10 mg/l and a ratio of alkalinity to chlor-
ide plus sulfate of at least 5 (when both are expressed as calcium carbonate).
Silicates and polyphosphates are often described as “corrosion inhibitors”, but
there is no guarantee that they will inhibit corrosion in water distribution systems.
However, they can complex dissolved iron (in the iron(II) state) and prevent its pre-
cipitation as visibly obvious red “rust”. These compounds may act by masking the ef-
fects of corrosion rather than by preventing it. Orthophosphate is a possible corrosion
inhibitor and, like polyphosphates, is used to prevent “red water”.

A5.3.5 Lead
Lead corrosion (plumbosolvency) is of particular concern. Lead piping is still com-
mon in old houses in some countries, lead solders have been used widely for jointing
copper tubing and brass fittings can contain substantial amounts of lead. Galvanized
iron pipe plumbing can accumulate incoming lead and release it at a later time as
particulates. The solubility of lead is governed by the formation of lead carbonates as
pipe deposits. Wherever practicable, lead pipework should be replaced. Lead can also
leach from lead-based solders and brass and bronze fittings.
The solubility of corrosion-related lead salts increases markedly as the pH in-
creases above or decreases below 8.3 because of the substantial decrease in the equi-
librium carbonate concentration. Thus, plumbosolvency tends to be at a maximum
in waters with a low pH and low alkalinity, and a useful interim control procedure,
pending pipe replacement, is to increase the pH to 8.0–8.5 after chlorination prior to
distribution. Orthophosphate and other phosphates are effective in suppressing dis-
solution of lead.
Lead concentrations increase with increasing standing time of water in lead pipe.
Flushing the pipework before drawing water for consumption can be used as an in-
terim measure to reduce exposure to lead. Showering, bathing and flushing the toilet
can be used to flush out the system.
Lead can corrode more rapidly when it is coupled to copper. The rate of such gal-
vanic corrosion is faster than that of simple oxidative corrosion, and lead concentra-
tions are not limited by the solubility of the corrosion products. The rate of galvanic
corrosion is affected principally by chloride concentration. Galvanic corrosion is less
easily controlled but can be reduced by dosing zinc in conjunction with orthophos-
phate and by adjustment of pH.
Treatment to reduce plumbosolvency usually involves pH adjustment. When
the water is very soft (calcium carbonate concentration less than 50 mg/l), the opti-
mum pH is about 8.0–8.5. Alternatively, dosing with orthophosphoric acid or sodium
orthophosphate might be more effective, particularly when plumbosolvency occurs
in non-acidic waters. Calcium carbonate precipitation indices such as Langelier and
Ryznar are not considered to be necessarily good predictors of corrosion for lead.

A5.3.6 Nickel
Nickel in water may arise due to the leaching of nickel from new nickel/chromium-
plated taps. Low concentrations may also arise from stainless steel pipes and fittings.

502
 ANNEX 5. TREATMENT METHODS AND PERFORMANCE

Nickel leaching falls off over time. An increase of pH to control corrosion of other
materials should also reduce leaching of nickel.

A5.3.7 Zinc
Galvanized pipes will release zinc (from the galvanizing layer) and can also leach cad-
mium and lead. Corrosion can be a particular problem where galvanized steel or iron
piping is connected to dissimilar materials, such as brass, in taps and fittings.
The solubility of zinc in water is a function of pH and total inorganic carbon
concentrations; the solubility of basic zinc carbonate decreases with increase in pH
and concentrations of carbonate species. For low-alkalinity waters, an increase of pH
to 8.5 should be sufficient to control the dissolution of zinc.
With galvanized iron, the zinc layer initially protects the steel by corroding prefer-
entially. In the long term, a protective deposit of basic zinc carbonate forms; however,
galvanized pipe is also prone to uncontrolled deposition and clogging. Recent findings
have shown that lead can accumulate on galvanized pipe particulates and become
resuspended by physical disruption, such as water hammer. Protective deposits do
not form in soft waters where the alkalinity is less than 50 mg/l as calcium carbonate
or waters containing high carbon dioxide concentrations (> 25 mg/l), and galvanized
steel is unsuitable for these waters. Electrolytic corrosion can occur where galvanized
steel or iron pipes or fittings are connected with copper tube or brass fittings.

503