Estrus Synch Buffalo
Estrus Synch Buffalo
Estrus Synch Buffalo
Estrus synchronization protocols in swamp buffaloes have Markandeya and Bharkad, 2002) [7, 69] and animals return to
been recently reviewed (Yendraliza et al., 2015) [115]. In the estrus within 50-96 hr of administration. Thus, for
present review, the prospects, approaches and limitations of prostaglandins to be effective animals should be cyclic. The
estrus synchronization in river buffaloes are discussed. administration of PG causes luteolysis and this permits the
dominant follicle (DF) of the follicular growth wave to grow
Prospects and prerequisites to a stage that allows estrus and ovulation (Day and Geary,
The benefits of estrus synchronization in dairy cows have 2005) [33]. An obvious increase in the size of the DF (from
been analysed previously. It was reported that the use of 0.97 ± 0.07 cm to 1.4 ± 0.09 cm) was recorded in Egyptian
ovsynch reduced intervals to first AI, days open and/or culling buffaloes on Day 2 of PG injection, with concomitant
of cows for infertility (Tenhagen et al., 2004) [105]. The decrease in plasma progesterone and estrus in 3-4 days post
pregnancy rates can be increased further by accurate estrus injection (Noseir et al., 2014) [79]. The return to estrus would
detection methods to re-inseminate cows that spontaneously depend upon the status (Size and dominance) of dominant
return to estrus, concurrent with routine pregnancy diagnosis follicle and CL (at the time of PG administration). Most
and re-synchronization of non-pregnant cows (Galvao et al., buffaloes with a CL and a DF below 1.0 cm would respond to
2013) [42]. PG however, buffaloes with a CL and a DF above 1.0 cm
Estrus synchronization in buffaloes can address two distinct respond poorly (Brito et al., 2002) [16].
problems of breeding. First, estrus signs are less marked in Since buffaloes are known to have a preponderance of two
buffaloes (Roy and Prakash, 2009) [90] which can be wave cycle (63.3%) (Baruseli et al 2013) and a lower number
efficiently managed by estrus synchronization, followed by of follicles are recruited per follicular wave (Campanile et al
timed insemination without estrus detection (Baruselli et al., 2010; Baruselli et al., 2013) [10, 21, 19], the probability of
2013) [10] and second, anestrus postpartum buffaloes can be buffalo returning to estrus following PG administration is
effectively impregnated during the hot summer, which would lower compared to cows. Palpation of a CL in buffaloes
have otherwise continued to be non-pregnant during the non- appears difficult due to poor projection on the ovarian surface
breeding season, thus reducing days open and achieving (Sharifuddin and Jainudeen, 1983) [96]. However, estrus rates
yearly calving (Kumar et al., 2012) [63]. This has been shown after a single PG administration following palpation of a CL
in many studies (Malik et al., 2011b; Ghuman et al., 2014) or without palpation of CL in different studies (Table 1)
[112, 44]
. Using estrus synchronization, 50-75% pregnancy rate appear to be high. A smaller number of animals (>25) were
can be achieved during the first month of the breeding season utilized in most of these studies, conducted during the
without estrus detection (Crudeli and de La Sota, 2011; breeding season. Besides many variables like, day’s
Baruselli et al., 2013) [10, 31]. Additional pregnancies during postpartum (Usmani, 2001) [109], nutritional status (Hussein
non-breeding season would result in calvings during a time of and Abdel-Raheem, 2013) [52] and others that regulate effects
milk deficit improving overall profitability of buffalo farming. of prostaglandins, an important determinant appears to be the
Pregnancy rates are, however, dependent upon many factors season of administration. Administration of a single PG to
such as estrus detection, nutritional status, body condition buffalo heifers resulted in estrus rates of 60% during the low
score and postpartum interval. Low pregnancy rates during breeding season with poor subsequent conception rates (22.8 -
low breeding season result from high embryonic mortalities 25.6%) (Chohan et al., 1993) [27], whereas, during the
(Campanile et al., 2005; Russo et al., 2010) [19, 46]. Animals breeding season estrus rates were 86.6% and conception rates
should be in good body condition before initiating estrus varied from 47.8 to 53% (Table 1).
synchronization. It is beneficial to examine animals by Results of estrus synchronization using PG in pre-pubertal
transrectal palpation and transrectal ultrasonography to buffalo heifers and postpartum anestrus buffaloes may be sub-
evaluate uterine and ovarian status (De Rensis and Lopez optimal (Honparkhe et al., 2008) [49]. None of the 12
Gatius, 2007) [34] before initiating estrus synchronization. postpartum acyclic buffaloes treated with PG responded to the
Buffaloes with a DF and a CL are good candidates for treatment. Eight of the 12 Murrah buffalo heifers (32 months
inclusion in the synchronization programs. Buffalo heifers age) managed at an organized farm responded well to the PG
should have attained around 60% of their adult body weight injections with estrus and ovulation within 48 h of PG
and a minimum of 50% of heifers should have normal estrous injection (Singh and Madan, 2000) [49] however, this might
cycles. Use of high fertility buffalo bulls and high fertility not be applicable to farmers buffaloes at similar age (due to
semen are also essential for attaining success with estrus diverse nutritional and managemental conditions) (Brito et al.,
synchronization. 2002; Misra et al., 2003) [16, 71]. Thus, the nutritional status
and ongoing follicular and luteal activity appears important
Approaches and limitations when selecting a diverse group of buffaloes comprising of
Similar to cattle, estrus synchronization approaches in the buffalo heifers and postpartum anestrus buffaloes. The intra-
buffalo have used prostaglandins, progestins and GnRH based vulvo-submucosal route of administration of PG has been
protocols in combination with other hormones such as suggested for estrus induction/synchronization in buffaloes
estradiol and hCG. The use of a particular approach would (Totewad et al., 2009; Lucy et al., 2010) [107, 64] to reduce the
depend upon many factors which should be considered prior cost but estrus synchronization with such a treatment was
to use of a particular product. suboptimal and delayed compared to the intramuscular use.
Administration of 2 PG 11-12 days apart is suggested for
Prostaglandins cyclic animals in well managed buffalo herds during the
Use of prostaglandins is one of the oldest approaches for breeding season with satisfactory conception rates (Table 1)
synchronization of estrus in buffaloes (De Rensis and Lopez- employing natural service or timed artificial insemination.
Gatius, 2007) [34]. The admsinistration of natural or synthetic
prostaglandins to the buffalo results in a marked decrease in Progestins
progesterone due to luetolysis (Chohan et al., 1992; Progestin treatments inhibit the maturation of DF due to
~ 55 ~
The Pharma Innovation Journal
suppression of both FSH and LH which promote the atresia of period is important for the expression of estrus as well as for
all follicles present on the ovary in cattle and buffaloes subsequent normal luteal function (Baruselli et al., 2007) [8].
(Baruselli et al., 2007; Suadsong, 2011) [8]. Once the DF A longer period of progesterone treatment (12-14 d) has been
undergoes atresia, its suppressive effects on other small suggested to mediate these effects (Bhat et al., 2015) [13].
follicles and FSH are removed which allows a new follicular However, a recent report depicted reduction in hypothalamo-
wave to begin with formation of a DF which attains ovulatory pituitary responsiveness to synchronization treatments
capacity following withdrawal of progesterone implant. The including PRID and ovsynch during increasing daylight
use of estradiol or GnRH on the day of implant insertion (Barile et al., 2015) [7].
significantly suppresses DF growth and enhances new wave Progestins have been used as oral supplements, daily
emergence (Suadsong, 2011; Bhat et al., 2015) [104, 13]. injections, auricular implants (norgestomet) and vaginal
Follicular waves emerged in Murrah buffaloes on days implants however, use of commercially available vaginal
4.22±0.12, 3.12±0.33 and 5.14±0.42 of treatment with implants (CIDR and PRID) has been most common. Use of
estradiol + CIDR, GnRH + CIDR or CIDR alone (Bhat et al., indigenously prepared methyl-acetoxy progesterone vaginal
2015) [13]. Similarly, in another study on Italian buffaloes sponges was reported in one study with estrus rates of 50-80%
treated with estradiol and progestagens, a new follicular wave and conception rates of 33% in acyclic and 50% in cyclic
occurred around the 4th day of treatment (Niasari-Naslagi et Nili-Ravi buffaloes (Kausar et al., 2013) [58] sponges.
al., 2007). The diameter of the largest follicle was reduced
from about 8mm (Day 0) to 5 mm around the day of wave Oral supplements
emergence. Also, the mean number of 4-5 mm follicles Oral administration of progestin melengestrol acetate (MGA;
increased from 1.58 (Day 0) to 5 around the day of wave 1-2 mg daily for 9-14 days) alone or combined with 500 µg
emergence (Bhat et al., 2015) [13]. IM estradiol 24-48 hrs before last MGA dose to buffalo
Progesterone based treatments in combination with estradiol, heifers has been reported in a few studies with estrus rates of
PG, GnRH or hCG and timed inseminations are considered 62.7-100% however, conception rates were only 35%
more useful during the non-breeding season in buffaloes due (Shanker et al 1996) [95]. Administration of low levels of oral
to poor responses of other estrus synchronization treatments progestin (MGA) in the absence of a corpus luteum can result
such as PG and ovsynch during this time (Carvalho et al., in the formation of persistent follicles in cattle (Smith et al.,
2013b; Vecchio et al., 2013) [22, 111]. Pre-pubertal buffalo 2011) [102] however; similar occurrence could not be recorded
heifers have low blood progesterone concentrations (Ahmed in trials involving small number of buffaloes.
et al., 2010) [10], which peak around puberty (Haldar and
Prakash, 2006) [47], thus progesterone treatments should be Progesterone injections
more suited to anestrus buffalo heifers for estrus Progesterone injections can be used as an alternative to oral
synchronization. This was shown in a small trial (n=6) on feeding of progestagens, however these injections have to be
PRID treated anestrus buffalo heifers, all of which exhibited administered on a daily basis for 5-8 days which limits their
estrus after PRID removal (Singh et al., 2009) [49] and similar practical applicability. The daily administration of
results were shown for anestrus buffaloes treated with progesterone injections (250 mg IM) for 5 days followed by
progesterone implants in combination with other hormones 500 IU eCG or 5 mg estradiol on day 6 to postpartum
(Carvalho et al., 2013a; Vikash et al., 2014) [23, 112]. A short buffaloes resulted in estrus rates of 40-59% and conception
period of elevated progesterone concentration during anestrus rates of 45.5% (Thakur, 1989; Kumar et al., 2010) [62, 106].
Ear implants buffaloes (>15), estrus rates were high and conception rates
Norgestomet is a synthetic progestagen ear implant that is were similar across regimens utilizing norgestomet in
administered subcutaneously and kept in place for 8-10 days, combination with eCG and PG or norgestomet alone (Table
followed by its removal. An estradiol valerate capsule and/ or 2). A larger trial on 100 anestrus buffaloes however, yielded
estradiol valerate (5 mg IM) is administered simultaneously to 75% estrus rates (Yadav et al., 1994) [114] only, and in another
synchronize estrus. Buffaloes show estrus within 24-48 hr of trial on 96 buffaloes the conception rates were41.4% (Phadnis
withdrawal of the auricular implant. Estrus rates in buffalo et al., 1994) [14]. However, another study on Murrah buffaloes
heifers were high (70-100%) in trials utilizing a smaller evidenced norgestomet to be ineffective in inducing cyclicity
number of animals (n=10) (Patel et al., 2003; Kumar and in postpartum anestrus buffaloes (Garg et al., 1999) [43].
Mandape, 2004) [61, 81]. Similarly, in experiments on adult
~ 56 ~
The Pharma Innovation Journal
Table 2: Estrus and conception rates in adult buffaloes administered norgestomet ear implants alone or with combination with eCG and PG
Estrus rates (%) Conception rates (%) References
Norgestomet (8-10 days) + 5 mg E2 60-100 30-70 Phadnis et al. (1994) [14]; Chattry et al. (1999); Patel et al. (2003) [81]
Norgestomet + 500 IU eCG 86-97.6 44.6-66.7 Luthra et al. (1994) [65]; Malik et al. (2011a) [113]
Norgestomet + PG (9 days) 100 45-66.7 Utage et al. (2010) [110]; Chaudhary et al. (2015) [25]
Timed insemination in 119 buffaloes 64-68 hr after of progestagen treatments in buffalo heifers. A trial in
withdrawal of norgestomet ear implants and administration of Venezuela buffalo heifers treated with PRID + E2 + PG
PG+ eCG before withdrawal during summer resulted in showed no conception in treated buffalo heifers (Noguera et
conception rates of 49.6% (Carvalho et al., 2013a) [24] and al., 2013) [78]. Anestrus buffaloes evidence a poor response,
similar conception rates were recorded in other trials on timed especially during the summer season when the implants are
insemination in adult buffaloes following estrus used alone (Sekerden et al 2005; Murugavel et al., 2009) [73].
synchronization with norgestomet in combination with eCG, It has thus been suggested to administer 1-2 mg estradiol and
PG and GnRH (Baruselli et al., 2007; Diaz et al., 1994) [8, 39] PG along with the CIDR/PRID (Caesar et al., 2011; Carvalho
et al 2013a) [22]. The combined use of estradiol and
Vaginal progesterone implants progestagen vaginal implant at the beginning of the regime
Two commercially available progesterone vaginal implants induces a new follicular wave due to atresia of all follicles
(CIDR and PRID) developed for cattle have been widely used present (Baruseli et al., 2007).
in buffaloes. The implants are applied for 8-10 days (Ghuman Alternatively, PG plus eCG or GnRH or both (eCG and
et al., 2009; Murugavel et al., 2009) [45, 73]. Estrus and GnRH) at withdrawal of implant have been suggested during
ovulation occur within 48-96 hrs after withdrawal of off season use (Caeser et al 2011; Frares et al 2013) [41]. The
progestagen implant in treated buffaloes (Bhosrekar et al., administration of eCG at the time of withdrawal of
1994) [82]. progestagen implants significantly increased the size of the
In experiments utilizing lesser number (n=20) of buffaloes the DF rapidly before ovulation (12 mm) from Day 9 to Day 12
estrus response to progesterone vaginal implants was depicted (Malik et al., 2011a) [113] and the estrus and ovulation rates
to be high (Table 3) however, the estrus response was lower (Caesar et al., 2011). The ovulation rate can further be
in trials using a higher number of buffaloes (<50). The estrus increased by the administration of GnRH two days after the
response and subsequent conception rates are dependent upon administration of eCG and PG (Carvalho et al 2013c) [23].
the reproductive status, days postpartum, ovarian follicular Timed insemination at 60-72 h after withdrawal of
status, season of the year and the simultaneous administration CIDR/PRID, and repeated at 24 h, has been suggested
of eCG, PG and GnRH (De Rensis and Lopez-Gatius, 2007) (Carvalho et al 2013a) [24]. Experiments using GnRH
[34]
. The mean diameter of the largest follicle was significantly (administered 2 days after implant withdrawal and eCG
smaller in nulliparous Italian buffalo heifers compared to administration at withdrawal) suggest fixed time insemination
mixed parity buffaloes during the first 4 days after PRID 24 hr after the GnRH administration (Carvalho et al 2013b)
removal (Presicce et al., 2004) [83], suggesting lower response [22]
during the non-breeding season.
Table 3: Estrus rates and conception rates in buffaloes administered CIDR/PRID intravaginal progesterone implants in different studies
No of animals Physiological state of buffalo Estrus rates (%) Conception rates (%) References
De Santis et al. (2003) [36]; Naseer et al. (2011) [74];
>20 Acyclic/sub estrus 80-100 56-80
Yotov et al. (2012) [116]; Kajaysri et al. (2015) [55]
21-50 Anestrus 83-100 50-80 Singh et al. (1988) [44]; Singh, (2003) [45]
21-50 Postpartum 71.4-100 46- 85.7 Sathiamoorthy et al. (2007) [93]; Caesar et al. (2011)
NBS-32.5-82 BS-54- 25.3 Rao and Rao, (1983); Bhoserkar et al. (1994);
>50 Anestrus
93 40.7 Ghuman et al. (2009) [45]
>50 Postpartum/ Acyclic - 36.0 Neglia et al., 2003 [76]
36.5-46.4 Carvalho et al. (2013a) [23]; Noguera et al. (2013) [78];
>50 Lactating/ Acyclic -
Urdaneta et al. (2013) [108]
GnRH based Protocols follicle present at the time of administration of first GnRH
Approaches utilizing administration of GnRH alone, followed may regress or persist throughout to ovulate subsequently
by PG to postpartum buffaloes have not become popular, (Day and Geary, 2005) [33]. The success of this protocol
although they can stimulate estrus and ovulation (Khasatiya et depends on the presence of a DF at the time of first GnRH
al., 2005) [59]. Pursley et al. (1995) [85] were the first to (De Rensis and Lopez-Gatius, 2007) [34] and this can be
demonstrate that the administration of GnRH, followed by determined by ultrasound examination of the ovaries (De
administration of PG 7 days later results in more precise Rensis et al., 2005) [35]. In a study on Mediterranean buffaloes
control of ovarian follicle growth and estrus and the ovulation the largest follicle present at the time of first GnRH
is assured by a second injection of GnRH 2 days after the PG. administration regressed in 46.6% of nulliparous and 78.5%
This has led to a wider use of GnRH in estrus synchronization of pluriparous animals (Presicce et al., 2005) [85]. In another
protocols in cattle and such a protocol is popularly known as study on postpartum anestrus Murrah buffaloes, all animals
ovsynch protocol. By far the ovsynch protocol is the most (n=15) ovulated one largest follicle in response to first GnRH
widely used regime in buffaloes. This ovulation treatment (Malik et al., 2011b) [112]. The ovulation of the
synchronization protocol employs the IM administration of largest follicle at the time of first GnRH administration is
GnRH, PG and GnRH on days 0, 7 and 9. probably dependent on the size of the dominant follicle (De
The administration of GnRH promotes ovulation of a DF and Rensis et al., 2005) [35]. When the size of the largest follicle
this initiates a new wave of follicular growth. The largest was >8mm at the time of first GnRH injection, 87.5% of
~ 57 ~
The Pharma Innovation Journal
heifers and 100% of adult buffaloes ovulated (Derar et al., The ovulation rate to first GnRH appears important and can
2012) [112]. The ovulation of the DF is also dependent on the be used as a preliminary screening of buffaloes to be
stage of the DF. inseminated, reducing timed insemination costs (Neglia et al.,
In buffaloes, Day 6 and Day 10 of the estrous cycle are 2013) [76], as pregnancy rates were significantly higher (81%)
considered the growth phase and regression phase of the first in buffaloes that ovulated after first GnRH injection compared
wave DF and the proportion of buffaloes that ovulate in to 22.3% in those that did not ovulate with first GnRH
response to GnRH during the growth and regression phase treatment (Neglia et al., 2013) [76]. The ovsynch protocol has
was 75.0 and 16.67%, respectively (Dharani et al., 2010) [38]. been used in buffaloes in a large number of countries with
Similarly, Campanile et al. (2008) [20] recorded ovulation in estrus rates varying from 41.6 to 91.9% and conception rates
62% of the buffaloes when GnRH was administered on Day 5 from 11.11 to 68.8% (Table 4). Similar pregnancy rates were
of the estrous cycle. Moreover, the DF of the first anovulatory recorded in studies using a combination of CIDR and ovsynch
wave reached the maximum size earlier and remained in static or norgestomet and ovsynch (Table 4). Although the DF at
phase for a greater number of days, indicating an early loss of first GnRH did not ovulate or regress in 50% of buffaloes
LH receptors in buffaloes compared to cows (Sateshkumar et treated with CIDR in combination with ovsynch treatment,
al., 2011) [87]. The ovulation of a DF initiates a new follicular yet the addition of a progestagen implant at the time of first
wave and formation of a new DF.A new follicular wave GnRH injection improved conception rates in acyclic
started one day after the first GnRH dose in Egyptian postpartum buffaloes (Ali et al., 2008; Alyas et al., 2013) [6].
buffaloes and this wave resulted in the development of a new Estrus synchronization in buffalo heifers using ovsynch has
DF with a diameter of 1.03+0.07 cm on day 7 after treatment yielded lower conception rates (18.8-40%) compared to those
(Day of PG administration) (Noseir et al., 2014) [79]. In in adult buffaloes (Irikura et al., 2003; Presicce et al., 2005)
[85, 53]
another study, the interval from first GnRH administration to . Many previous reports (Baruselli et al., 2002; Warriach
the onset of new follicular wave was 48 to 54 h and a new DF et al., 2008; Jabeen et al., 2013) [9, 113, 54] have shown that
developed from this wave (Ali et al., 2008). The estrus rates and conception rates in buffaloes with the
administration of PG 7 days later causes luteolysis and the ovsynch protocols are higher during the breeding season
new DF or the continually growing unovulated DF reaches (Estrus rates 87.5% versus 36.3% and conception rates 40%
the ovulatory size and the animal evidences estrus. The versus 11.1%) (Warriach et al., 2008; Jabeen et al., 2013) [113,
54]
second GnRH treatment ensures ovulation of the ovulatory .
follicle.
Table 4: Estrus rates and conception rates in buffaloes with ovsynch treatments in different reports
Estrus Rates (%) Conception Rates (%) Reference
Berber et al. (2001) [11]; Francillo et al. (2005) [40]; Ali and Fahmy, (2007) [37]; Sathiamoorthy
Ovsynch 46.3-91.9% 28.0 - 66.6
et al. (2007) [93]; Ravikumar et al. (2009) [88]; Derar et al. (2012) [112]; Hoque et al. (2014) [50]
Ovsynch + CIDR 58.3-86 18.18 – 63.6 Campanile et al. (2005) [19]; Ravikumar et al. (2008) [87]; Kalwar et al. (2015) [56]
Norgestomet +
- 71.4 Malik et al. (2010) [111]
Ovsynch
PG + Ovsynch - 36.4 Hoque et al. (2014) [50]
[18]
Camelo et al. (2002) ; Karen and Darwish, (2010) [57]; Akhtar et al. (2013) [2]; Neglia et al.
Ovsynch + TAI - 18 - 59
(2013) [76]
CIDR + Ovsynch +
100 66.67 Alyas et al. (2013) [6]
TAI
~ 59 ~
The Pharma Innovation Journal
~ 60 ~
The Pharma Innovation Journal
67. Malik RK, Singh P, Sharma RK, Singh I, Phulia SK et al. studies on oestrus synchronization in cows and buffaloes.
Efficacy of norgestomet ear implant for estrus induction Indian J Anim Sci. 1994; 64:1151-1154.
on postpartum anestrus Murrah buffaloes (Bubalus 83. Presicce GA, Senatore EM, Bella A, Parmeggiani A.
bubalis). Indian J Anim Sci. 2011a; 81:687-690. Ovarian follicular dynamics and hormonal profiles in
68. Malik RK, Singh P, Singh LJ, Sharma RK, Phulia SK et heifer and mixed-parity Mediterranean Italian buffaloes
al. Ovarian respose and fertility of ovsynch-treated (Bubalus bubalis) following an estrus synchronization
postpartum anestrus Murrah buffaloes. Buffalo Bull. protocol. Theriogenology. 2004; 61:1343-1355.
2011b; 30:272-276. 84. Presicce GA, Senatore EM, De Santis G, Bella A.
69. Markandeya NM, Bharkad GP. Effect of cloprostenol on Follicle turnover and pregnancy rates following estrus
conception rate during spring in suboestrus murrah synchronization protocols in Mediterranean Italian
buffaloes. Indian Vet J. 2002; 79:1205-1206. buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis). Reprod Domest Anim.
70. Mirmahmoudi R, Souri H, Prakash BS. Endocrine 2005; 40:443-447.
changes, timing of ovulation, ovarian follicular growth 85. Pursley JR, Mee MO, Wiltbank MC. Synchronization of
and efficacy of a novel protocol (Estra-double-synch) for ovulation in dairy cows using PGF2 alpha and GnRH.
synchronization of ovulation and timed artificial Theriogenology. 1995; 44:915-923.
insemination in Murrah buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis). 86. Rao AR, Rao CC. Synchronization of oestrus and fertility
Theriogenology. 2014; 81:237-242. in buffaloes with a progesterone releasing intravaginal
71. Misra AK, Kasiraj R, Rao MM, Reddy NSR, Pant HC. device. Vet Rec. 1983; 113:623-624.
Estrus response following PGF2α and superovulation 87. Ravikumar K, Asokan SA. Ovarian status, serum
treatments and its relationship with fertilization and progesterone level and conception rate in ovsynch treated
viable embryo production in water buffalo. Indian J Anim buffaloes. Indian Vet J. 2008; 85:388-392.
Sci. 2003; 73:245-248. 88. Ravikumar K, Asokan SA, Veerapandian C. Inclusion of
72. Mohan K, Sarkar M, Prakash BS. Efficiency of heat CIDR in ovsynch protocol to improve fertility in
synch protocol in estrus synchronization, ovulation and postpartum subestrus buffaloes. Indian J Anim Reprod.
conception in dairy buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis). Asian 2009; 30:29-31.
Austr J Anim Sci. 2009; 22:774-780. 89. Ribeiro HFL, Vale WG, Sousa J, Silva AOA. The
73. Murugavel K Antoine D Raju MS, López-Gatius F. The luteolytic effect of small doses of prostaglandin for
effect of addition of equine chorionic gonadotropin to a oestrus synchronization and fertility in buffaloes. Book-
progesterone-based estrous synchronization protocol in Proceedings of the 4th SIPAR follow-up seminar on
buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) under tropical conditions. animal reproduction and biotechnology for Latin
Theriogenology. 2009; 71:1120-1126. America, Belem-Para-Brazil. 1998; 2:70-75.
74. Naseer Z, Ahmad E, Singh J, Ahmad N. Fertility 90. Roy KS, Prakash BS. Plasma progesterone, estradiol 17
following CIDR based synchronization regimens in beta and total estrogen profiles in relation to estrous
anoestrous Nili-Ravi buffaloes. Reprod Domest Anim. behavior during induced ovulation in Murrah buffalo
2011; 46:814-817. heifers. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 2009; 93:486-495.
75. Neglia G, Gasparrini B, Cimmino R, Zullo G, Albero G, 91. Russo M, Vecchio D, Neglia G, Pacelli C, Prandi A et al.
et al. Response of the first GnRH and pregnancy outcome Corpus luteum function and pregnancy outcome in
in buffaloes underwent ovsynch and fixed timed artificial buffaloes during the transition period from breeding to
insemination. Buffalo Bull. 2013; 32:483. non-breeding season. Reprod Domest Anim. 2010;
76. Neglia G, Gasparrini B, Palo R di, Rosa C de, Zicarelli L, 45:988-991.
et al. Comparison of pregnancy rates with two estrus 92. Sateshkumar S, Palanisamy A, Rangasamy S, Kathiresan
synchronization protocols in Italian Mediterranean D, Kumanan K. Comparative analysis of follicular and
Buffalo cows. Theriogenology. 2003; 60:125-133. luteal dynamics in estrous cycle of buffaloes and
77. Niasari-Naslagi A, Rastegarina A, Howareshi P, Sarhaddi crossbred cattle. Buffalo Bull. 2011; 30:148-151.
F, Kordnejad C et al. Effect of steroids on ovarian 93. Sathiamoorthy T, Parthasarathy R, Kathirchelvan M.
follicular growth in river buffalo. Italian J Anim Sci. Efficacy of PGF2α, CIDR and ovsynch treatment on
2007; 6:597-599. estrus induction and fertility in postpartum buffaloes-A
78. Noguera SEG, Vale WG, Ribeiro HFL, Rolim Filho ST, field study. Indian J Anim Reprod. 2007; 28:8-11.
Reis AN et al. Fixed-time artificial insemination in cows 94. Şekerden O, Köroğlu M, Saban E. Possibilities of early
and buffaloes using an intravaginal releasing pregnancy diagnosis by blood and milk progesterone test
progesterone insert. Livestock Res Rural Dev. 2013; post insemination in Anatolian buffalo cows of Hatay
25(10):171. Province.Tarim Bilimleri Dergisi. 2005; 11:34-39.
79. Noseir WMB, El-Bawab IE, Hassan WR, Fadel MS. 95. Shanker U, Singh MP, Upadhyay MP, Pant HC.
Ovarian follicular dynamics in buffaloes during different Treatment of true anoestrus in bovine with progesterone
estrus synchronization protocols. Vet Sci. Dev. 2014; and oestrogen. Indian J Anim Reprod. 1996; 17:1-5.
4:25-29. 96. Sharifuddin W, Jainudeen MR. The accuracy of rectal
80. Pant HC, Singh GD. Application of prostaglandin F2 α diagnosis of corporalutea in water buffaloes (Bubalus
(PGF2 α) in the treatment of Sub-oestrus in buffaloes. bubalis). Anim Reprod Sci. 1983; 6:185-189.
Indian J Anim Reprod. 1991; 12:55-57. 97. Singh J, Ghuman SPS, Honparkhe M, Singh N.
81. Patel DM, Sarvaiya NP, Patel AV, Parmar AP, Dugwekar Investigation on dominant follicle development, estrus
YG. Induction of estrus and hormonal profile in buffalo response, ovulation time and fertility in PRID treated
treated with norgestomet ear implant. Indian J Anim anestrus buffalo heifers. Indian J Anim Sci. 2009;
Reprod. 2003; 24:67-68. 79:773-777.
82. Phandis YP, Bhosrekar MR, Mangurkar BR. On farm 98. Singh, Madan ML. Effects of PGF2 alpha and GnRH
~ 61 ~
The Pharma Innovation Journal
~ 62 ~