DESIGNERS’ GUIDES TO THE EUROCODES

DESIGNERS’ GUIDE TO EN 1994-2

EUROCODE 4: DESIGN OF STEEL AND
COMPOSITE STRUCTURES

PART 2: GENERAL RULES AND RULES FOR BRIDGES

Eurocode Designers’ Guide Series
Designers’ Guide to EN 1990. Eurocode: Basis of Structural Design. H. Gulvanessian, J.-A. Calgaro and
M. Holický. 0 7277 3011 8. Published 2002.

Designers’ Guide to EN 1994-1-1. Eurocode 4: Design of Composite Steel and Concrete Structures. Part 1.1:
General Rules and Rules for Buildings. R. P. Johnson and D. Anderson. 0 7277 3151 3. Published 2004.

Designers’ Guide to EN 1997-1. Eurocode 7: Geotechnical Design – General Rules. R. Frank, C. Bauduin,
R. Driscoll, M. Kavvadas, N. Krebs Ovesen, T. Orr and B. Schuppener. 0 7277 3154 8. Published 2004.

Designers’ Guide to EN 1993-1-1. Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures. General Rules and Rules for Buildings.
L. Gardner and D. Nethercot. 0 7277 3163 7. Published 2004.

Designers’ Guide to EN 1992-1-1 and EN 1992-1-2. Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures. General Rules
and Rules for Buildings and Structural Fire Design. A.W. Beeby and R. S. Narayanan. 0 7277 3105 X. Published
2005.

Designers’ Guide to EN 1998-1 and EN 1998-5. Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance.
General Rules, Seismic Actions, Design Rules for Buildings, Foundations and Retaining Structures. M. Fardis,
E. Carvalho, A. Elnashai, E. Faccioli, P. Pinto and A. Plumier. 0 7277 3348 6. Published 2005.

Designers’ Guide to EN 1995-1-1. Eurocode 5: Design of Timber Structures. Common Rules and for Rules and
Buildings. C. Mettem. 0 7277 3162 9. Forthcoming: 2007 (provisional).

Designers’ Guide to EN 1991-4. Eurocode 1: Actions on Structures. Wind Actions. N. Cook. 0 7277 3152 1.
Forthcoming: 2007 (provisional).

Designers’ Guide to EN 1996. Eurocode 6: Part 1.1: Design of Masonry Structures. J. Morton. 0 7277 3155 6.
Forthcoming: 2007 (provisional).

Designers’ Guide to EN 1991-1-2, 1992-1-2, 1993-1-2 and EN 1994-1-2. Eurocode 1: Actions on Structures.
Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures. Eurocode 4: Design of Composite Steel and Concrete Structures. Fire
Engineering (Actions on Steel and Composite Structures). Y. Wang, C. Bailey, T. Lennon and D. Moore.
0 7277 3157 2. Forthcoming: 2007 (provisional).

Designers’ Guide to EN 1992-2. Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures. Bridges. D. Smith and C. Hendy.
0 7277 3159 9. Forthcoming: 2007 (provisional).

Designers’ Guide to EN 1993-2. Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures. Bridges. C. Murphy and C. Hendy.
0 7277 3160 2. Forthcoming: 2007 (provisional).

Designers’ Guide to EN 1991-2, 1991-1-1, 1991-1-3 and 1991-1-5 to 1-7. Eurocode 1: Actions on Structures.
Traffic Loads and Other Actions on Bridges. J.-A. Calgaro, M. Tschumi, H. Gulvanessian and N. Shetty.
0 7277 3156 4. Forthcoming: 2007 (provisional).

Designers’ Guide to EN 1991-1-1, EN 1991-1-3 and 1991-1-5 to 1-7. Eurocode 1: Actions on Structures. General
Rules and Actions on Buildings (not Wind). H. Gulvanessian, J.-A. Calgaro, P. Formichi and G. Harding.
0 7277 3158 0. Forthcoming: 2007 (provisional).

www.eurocodes.co.uk
DESIGNERS’ GUIDES TO THE EUROCODES

DESIGNERS’ GUIDE TO EN 1994-2

EUROCODE 4: DESIGN OF STEEL AND
COMPOSITE STRUCTURES

PART 2: GENERAL RULES AND RULES

FOR BRIDGES

C. R. HENDY and R. P. JOHNSON

Published by Thomas Telford Publishing, Thomas Telford Ltd, 1 Heron Quay, London E14 4JD
URL: www.thomastelford.com

Distributors for Thomas Telford books are

USA: ASCE Press, 1801 Alexander Bell Drive, Reston, VA 20191-4400
Japan: Maruzen Co. Ltd, Book Department, 3–10 Nihonbashi 2-chome, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 103
Australia: DA Books and Journals, 648 Whitehorse Road, Mitcham 3132, Victoria

First published 2006

Eurocodes Expert

Structural Eurocodes offer the opportunity of harmonized design standards for the European
construction market and the rest of the world. To achieve this, the construction industry needs to
become acquainted with the Eurocodes so that the maximum advantage can be taken of these
opportunities

Eurocodes Expert is a new ICE and Thomas Telford initiative set up to assist in creating a greater
awareness of the impact and implementation of the Eurocodes within the UK construction industry

Eurocodes Expert provides a range of products and services to aid and support the transition to
Eurocodes. For comprehensive and useful information on the adoption of the Eurocodes and their
implementation process please visit our website or email eurocodes@thomastelford.com

A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library

ISBN: 0 7277 3161 0

# The authors and Thomas Telford Limited 2006

All rights, including translation, reserved. Except as permitted by the Copyright, Designs and Patents
Act 1988, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in
any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior
written permission of the Publishing Director, Thomas Telford Publishing, Thomas Telford Ltd,
1 Heron Quay, London E14 4JD.

This book is published on the understanding that the authors are solely responsible for the statements
made and opinions expressed in it and that its publication does not necessarily imply that such
statements and/or opinions are or reflect the views or opinions of the publishers. While every effort
has been made to ensure that the statements made and the opinions expressed in this publication
provide a safe and accurate guide, no liability or responsibility can be accepted in this respect by the
authors or publishers.

Typeset by Academic þ Technical, Bristol

Printed and bound in Great Britain by MPG Books, Bodmin
Preface

EN 1994, also known as Eurocode 4 or EC4, is one standard of the Eurocode suite and
describes the principles and requirements for safety, serviceability and durability of compo-
site steel and concrete structures. It is subdivided into three parts:
. Part 1.1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings
. Part 1.2: Structural Fire Design
. Part 2: General Rules and Rules for Bridges.
It is used in conjunction with EN 1990, Basis of Structural Design; EN 1991, Actions on
Structures; and the other design Eurocodes.

Aims and objectives of this guide

The principal aim of this book is to provide the user with guidance on the interpretation and
use of EN 1994-2 and to present worked examples. It covers topics that will be encountered
in typical steel and concrete composite bridge designs, and explains the relationship between
EN 1994-1-1, EN 1994-2 and the other Eurocodes. It refers extensively to EN 1992 (Design of
Concrete Structures) and EN 1993 (Design of Steel Structures), and includes the application
of their provisions in composite structures. Further guidance on these and other Eurocodes
will be found in other Guides in this series.1
7 This book also provides background
information and references to enable users of Eurocode 4 to understand the origin and
objectives of its provisions.
The need to use many Eurocode parts can initially make it a daunting task to locate
information in the sequence required for a real design. To assist with this process, flow
charts are provided for selected topics. They are not intended to give detailed procedural
information for a specific design.

Layout of this guide

EN 1994-2 has a foreword, nine sections, and an annex. This guide has an introduction which
corresponds to the foreword of EN 1994-2, Chapters 1 to 9 which correspond to Sections 1 to
9 of the Eurocode, and Chapter 10 which refers to Annexes A and B of EN 1994-1-1 and
covers Annex C of EN 1994-2. Commentary on Annexes A and B is given in the Guide by
Johnson and Anderson.5
The numbering and titles of the sections and second-level clauses in this guide also corre-
spond to those of the clauses of EN 1994-2. Some third-level clauses are also numbered (for
example, 1.1.2). This implies correspondence with the sub-clause in EN 1994-2 of the same
number. Their titles also correspond. There are extensive references to lower-level clause and
paragraph numbers. The first significant reference is in bold italic type (e.g. clause 1.1.1(2)).
DESIGNERS’ GUIDE TO EN 1994-2

These are in strict numerical sequence throughout the book, to help readers find comments
on particular provisions of the code. Some comments on clauses are necessarily out of
sequence, but use of the index should enable these to be found.
All cross-references in this guide to sections, clauses, sub-clauses, paragraphs, annexes,
figures, tables and expressions of EN 1994-2 are in italic type, and do not include
‘EN 1994-2’. Italic is also used where text from a clause in EN 1994-2 has been directly
reproduced.
Cross-references to, and quotations and expressions from, other Eurocodes are in roman
type. Clause references include the EN number; for example, ‘clause 3.1.4 of EN 1992-1-1’ (a
reference in clause 5.4.2.2(2)). All other quotations are in roman type. Expressions repeated
from EN 1994-2 retain their number. The authors’ expressions have numbers prefixed by D
(for Designers’ Guide); for example, equation (D6.1) in Chapter 6.
Abbreviated terms are sometimes used for parts of Eurocodes (e.g. EC4-1-1 for EN 1994-
1-18 ) and for limit states (e.g. ULS for ultimate limit state).

Acknowledgements
The first author would like to thank his wife, Wendy, and two boys, Peter Edwin Hendy and
Matthew Philip Hendy, for their patience and tolerance of his pleas to finish ‘just one more
paragraph’. He thanks his employer, Atkins, for providing both facilities and time for the
production of this guide, and the members of BSI B525/10 Working Group 2 who provided
comment on many of the Eurocode clauses.
The second author is deeply indebted to the other members of the project and editorial
teams for Eurocode 4 on which he has worked: David Anderson, Gerhard Hanswille,
Bernt Johansson, Basil Kolias, Jean-Paul Lebet, Henri Mathieu, Michel Mele, Joel Raoul,
Karl-Heinz Roik and Jan Stark; and also to the Liaison Engineers, National Technical
Contacts, and others who prepared national comments. He thanks the University of
Warwick for facilities provided for Eurocode work, and, especially, his wife Diana for her
unfailing support.

Chris Hendy
Roger Johnson

vi
Contents

Preface v
Aims and objectives of this guide v
Layout of this guide v
Acknowledgements vi

Introduction 1
Additional information specific to EN 1994-2 2

Chapter 1. General 3
1.1. Scope 3
1.1.1. Scope of Eurocode 4 3
1.1.2. Scope of Part 1.1 of Eurocode 4 3
1.1.3. Scope of Part 2 of Eurocode 4 4
1.2. Normative references 5
1.3. Assumptions 7
1.4. Distinction between principles and application rules 7
1.5. Definitions 8
1.5.1. General 8
1.5.2. Additional terms and definitions 8
1.6. Symbols 8

Chapter 2. Basis of design 11

2.1. Requirements 11
2.2. Principles of limit states design 12
2.3. Basic variables 12
2.4. Verification by the partial factor method 12
2.4.1. Design values 12
2.4.2. Combination of actions 15
2.4.3. Verification of static equilibrium (EQU) 15

Chapter 3. Materials 17
3.1. Concrete 17
3.2. Reinforcing steel for bridges 19
3.3. Structural steel for bridges 21
3.4. Connecting devices 22
3.4.1. General 22
3.4.2. Headed stud shear connectors 22
DESIGNERS’ GUIDE TO EN 1994-2

3.5. Prestressing steel and devices 23

3.6. Tension components in steel 23

Chapter 4. Durability 25
4.1. General 25
4.2. Corrosion protection at the steel–concrete interface in bridges 27

Chapter 5. Structural analysis 29

5.1. Structural modelling for analysis 29
5.1.1. Structural modelling and basic assumptions 29
5.1.2. Joint modelling 30
5.1.3. Ground–structure interaction 30
5.2. Structural stability 30
5.2.1. Effects of deformed geometry of the structure 31
5.2.2. Methods of analysis for bridges 33
5.3. Imperfections 34
5.3.1. Basis 34
5.3.2. Imperfections for bridges 35
5.4. Calculation of action effects 36
5.4.1. Methods of global analysis 36
Example 5.1: effective widths of concrete flange for shear lag 41
5.4.2. Linear elastic analysis 42
Example 5.2: modular ratios for long-term loading and for shrinkage 53
Example 5.3: primary effects of shrinkage 54
5.4.3. Non-linear global analysis for bridges 56
5.4.4. Combination of global and local action effects 56
5.5. Classification of cross-sections 57
Example 5.4: classification of composite beam section in hogging bending 60
Flow charts for global analysis 62

Chapter 6. Ultimate limit states 67

6.1. Beams 67
6.1.1. Beams in bridges – general 67
6.1.2. Effective width for verification of cross-sections 68
6.2. Resistances of cross-sections of beams 68
6.2.1. Bending resistance 69
Example 6.1: plastic resistance moment in sagging bending 72
Example 6.2: resistance to hogging bending at an internal support 73
Example 6.3: elastic bending resistance of a Class 4 cross-section 77
6.2.2. Resistance to vertical shear 79
Example 6.4: resistance of a Class 4 section to hogging bending and
vertical shear 85
Example 6.5: addition of axial compression to a Class 4 cross-section 86
6.3. Filler beam decks 89
6.3.1. Scope 89
6.3.2. General 90
6.3.3. Bending moments 90
6.3.4. Vertical shear 91
6.3.5. Resistance and stability of steel beams during execution 91
6.4. Lateral–torsional buckling of composite beams 91
6.4.1. General 91
6.4.2. Beams in bridges with uniform cross-sections in Class 1, 2
and 3 92

viii
 CONTENTS

6.4.3. General methods for buckling of members and frames 93

Example 6.6: bending and shear in a continuous composite beam 104
Example 6.7: stiffness and required resistance of cross-bracing 111
6.5. Transverse forces on webs 113
6.6. Shear connection 114
6.6.1. General 114
Example 6.8: shear resistance of a block connector with a hoop 116
6.6.2. Longitudinal shear force in beams for bridges 118
6.6.3. Headed stud connectors in solid slabs and concrete
encasement 121
6.6.4. Headed studs that cause splitting in the direction of the
slab thickness 123
6.6.5. Detailing of the shear connection and influence of
execution 124
6.6.6. Longitudinal shear in concrete slabs 127
Example 6.9: transverse reinforcement for longitudinal shear 130
Example 6.10: longitudinal shear checks 131
Example 6.11: influence of in-plane shear in a compressed flange on
bending resistances of a beam 134
6.7. Composite columns and composite compression members 136
6.7.1. General 136
6.7.2. General method of design 137
6.7.3. Simplified method of design 138
6.7.4. Shear connection and load introduction 144
6.7.5. Detailing provisions 145
Example 6.12: concrete-filled tube of circular cross-section 145
6.8. Fatigue 150
6.8.1. General 150
6.8.2. Partial factors for fatigue assessment of bridges 151
6.8.3. Fatigue strength 152
6.8.4. Internal forces and fatigue loadings 152
6.8.5. Stresses 153
6.8.6. Stress ranges 155
6.8.7. Fatigue assessment based on nominal stress ranges 156
Example 6.13: fatigue verification of studs and reinforcement 157
6.9. Tension members in composite bridges 161

Chapter 7. Serviceability limit states 163

7.1. General 163
7.2. Stresses 164
7.3. Deformations in bridges 166
7.3.1. Deflections 166
7.3.2. Vibrations 166
7.4. Cracking of concrete 167
7.4.1. General 167
7.4.2. Minimum reinforcement 168
7.4.3. Control of cracking due to direct loading 169
7.5. Filler beam decks 173
Example 7.1: checks on serviceability stresses, and control of
cracking 173

Chapter 8. Precast concrete slabs in composite bridges 179

8.1. General 179
8.2. Actions 180

ix
DESIGNERS’ GUIDE TO EN 1994-2

8.3. Design, analysis and detailing of the bridge slab 180

8.4. Interface between steel beam and concrete slab 181

Chapter 9. Composite plates in bridges 183

9.1. General 183
9.2. Design for local effects 183
9.3. Design for global effects 184
9.4. Design of shear connectors 185
Example 9.1: design of shear connection for global effects at the
serviceability limit state 187

Chapter 10. Annex C (informative). Headed studs that cause splitting forces in
the direction of the slab thickness 189
C.1. Design resistance and detailing 190
C.2. Fatigue strength 191
Applicability of Annex C 191
Example 10.1: design of lying studs 192

References 195

Index 201

x
References

European Standards listed as EN . . . are being published in each Member State of the Comité
Européen de Normalisation (CEN) by its National Standards organisation between 2002
and 2007. In the UK, publication is by the British Standards Institution, London, as BS
EN . . . .
The Eurocodes, EN 1990 to EN 1999, are accompanied by National Annexes. These
annexes for the UK are expected to be completed by the end of 2007.

1. Gulvanessian, H., Calgaro, J.-A. and Holický, M. (2002) Designers’ Guide to EN 1990.
Eurocode: Basis of Structural Design. Thomas Telford, London.
2. Calgaro, J.-A., Tschumi, M., Gulvanessian, H. and Shetty, N. Designers’ Guide to EN
1991-1-1, 1991-1-3, 1991-1-5 to 1-7 and 1991-2, Eurocode 1: Actions on Structures.
(Traffic loads and other actions on bridges). Thomas Telford, London (in preparation).
3. Smith, D. and Hendy, C. R. Designers’ Guide to EN 1992-2. Eurocode 2: Design of
Concrete Structures. Part 2: Bridges. Thomas Telford, London (in preparation).
4. Murphy, C. J. M. and Hendy, C. R. Designers’ Guide to EN 1993-2. Eurocode 3:
Design of Steel Structures. Part 2: Bridges. Thomas Telford, London (to be published,
2007).
5. Johnson, R. P. and Anderson, D. (2004) Designers’ Guide to EN 1994-1-1. Eurocode 4:
Design of Composite Steel and Concrete Structures. Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules
for Buildings. Thomas Telford, London.
6. Beeby, A. W. and Narayanan, R. S. (2005) Designers’ Guide to EN 1992. Eurocode 2,
Design of Concrete Structures. Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings.
Thomas Telford, London.
7. Gardner, L. and Nethercot, D. (2005) Designers’ Guide to EN 1993. Eurocode 3,
Design of Steel Structures. Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings. Thomas
Telford, London.
8. British Standards Institution. Design of Composite Steel and Concrete Structures. Part
1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings. BSI, London, EN 1994.
9. British Standards Institution. Design of Composite Steel and Concrete Structures. Part
2: General Rules and Rules for Bridges. BSI, London, EN 1994.
10. The European Commission (2002) Guidance Paper L (Concerning the Construction
Products Directive ÿ 89/106/EEC). Application and Use of Eurocodes. EC, Brussels.
11. British Standards Institution. Steel, Concrete and Composite Bridges. (In many Parts.)
BSI, London, BS 5400.
12. Hanswille, G. (2006) The new German design code for composite bridges. In: Leon,
R. T. and Lange, J. (eds), Composite Construction in Steel and Concrete V. American
Society of Civil Engineers, New York, pp. 13ÿ24.
13. British Standards Institution. Eurocode: Basis of Structural Design. (Including
Annexes for Buildings, Bridges, etc.). BSI, London, EN 1990.
DESIGNERS’ GUIDE TO EN 1994-2

14. British Standards Institution. Actions on Structures. BSI, London, EN 1991. (In many
Parts.) See also Refs 26, 30, 53 and 103.
15. British Standards Institution. Design of Concrete Structures. BSI, London, EN 1992.
(In several Parts.) See also Ref. 27.
16. British Standards Institution. Design of Steel Structures. BSI, London, EN 1993. (In
many Parts.) See also Refs 19, 28, 38, 41, and 42.
17. British Standards Institution. Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance. BSI,
London, EN 1998. (In several Parts.)
18. Niehaus, H. and Jerling, W. (2006) The Nelson Mandela bridge as an example of the
use of composite materials in bridge construction in South Africa. In: Leon, R. T. and
Lange, J. (eds), Composite Construction in Steel and Concrete V. American Society of
Civil Engineers, New York, pp. 487ÿ500.
19. British Standards Institution. Design of Steel Structures. Part 1-8: Design of Joints.
BSI, London, EN 1993.
20. British Standards Institution (1994) Design of Composite Steel and Concrete
Structures. Part 1-1, General Rules and Rules for Buildings. BSI, London, BS DD
ENV 1994.
21. Hosain, M. U. and Pashan, A. (2006) Channel shear connectors in composite
beams: push-out tests. In: Leon, R. T. and Lange, J. (eds), Composite
Construction in Steel and Concrete V. American Society of Civil Engineers, New
York, pp. 501ÿ510.
22. Veljkovic, M. and Johansson, B. (2006) Residual static resistance of welded stud shear
connectors. In: Leon, R. T. and Lange, J. (eds), Composite Construction in Steel and
Concrete V. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, pp. 524ÿ533.
23. Andrä, H.-P. (1990) Economical shear connection with high fatigue strength. Pro-
ceedings of a Symposium on Mixed Structures, including New Materials, Brussels.
IABSE, Zurich. Reports 60, 167ÿ172.
24. Marecek, J., Samec, J. and Studnicka, J. (2005) Perfobond shear connector behaviour.
In: Hoffmeister, B. and Hechler, O. (eds), Eurosteel 2005, vol. B. Druck und
Verlagshaus Mainz, Aachen, pp. 4.3-1 to 4.3-8.
25. Hauke, B. (2005) Shear connectors for composite members of high strength
materials. In: Hoffmeister, B. and Hechler, O. (eds), Eurosteel 2005, vol. B. Druck
und Verlagshaus Mainz, Aachen, pp. 4.2-57 to 4.2-64.
26. British Standards Institution. Actions on Structures. Part 2: Traffic Loads on Bridges.
BSI, London, EN 1991.
27. British Standards Institution. Design of Concrete Structures. Part 2: Bridges. BSI,
London, EN 1992.
28. British Standards Institution. Design of Steel Structures. Part 2: Bridges. BSI,
London, EN 1993.
29. International Organisation for Standardization (1997) Basis of Design for Structures ÿ
Notation ÿ General Symbols. ISO, Geneva, ISO 3898.
30. British Standards Institution. Actions on Structures. Part 1-6: Actions during
Execution. BSI, London, EN 1991.
31. The European Commission (1989) Construction Products Directive 89/106/EEC,
OJEC No. L40 of 11 February. EC, Brussels.
32. British Standards Institution. Geotechnical Design. BSI, London, EN 1997. (In several
Parts.)
33. Anderson, D., Aribert, J.-M., Bode, H. and Kronenburger, H. J. (2000) Design
rotation capacity of composite joints. Structural Engineer, 78, No. 6, 25ÿ29.
34. Working Commission 2 (2005) Use and application of high-performance steels for
steel structures. Structural Engineering Documents 8, IABSE, Zurich.
35. Morino, S. (2002) Recent developments on concrete-filled steel tube members in
Japan. In: Hajjar, J. F., Hosain, M., Easterling, W. S. and Shahrooz, B. M. (eds),
Composite Construction in Steel and Concrete IV. American Society of Civil Engineers,
New York, pp. 644ÿ655.

196
 REFERENCES

36. Hegger, J. and Döinghaus, P. (2002) High performance steel and high performance
concrete in composite structures. In: Hajjar, J. F., Hosain, M., Easterling, W. S.
and Shahrooz, B. M. (eds), Composite Construction in Steel and Concrete IV.
American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, pp. 891ÿ902.
37. Hoffmeister, B., Sedlacek, G., Müller, C. and Kühn, B. (2002) High strength materials
in composite structures. In: Hajjar, J. F., Hosain, M., Easterling, W. S. and Shahrooz,
B. M. (eds), Composite Construction in Steel and Concrete IV. American Society of
Civil Engineers, New York, pp. 903ÿ914.
38. British Standards Institution. Design of Steel Structures. Part 1-3: Cold Formed Thin
Gauge Members and Sheeting. BSI, London, EN 1993.
39. Sedlacek, G. and Trumpf, H. (2006) Composite design for small and medium spans.
In: Leon, R. T. and Lange, J. (eds), Composite Construction in Steel and Concrete V.
American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, pp. 105ÿ113.
40. British Standards Institution. (1998) Welding ÿ Studs and Ceramic Ferrules for Arc
Stud Welding. BSI, London, EN 13918.
41. British Standards Institution. Design of Steel Structures. Part 1-5: Plated Structural
Elements. BSI, London, EN 1993.
42. British Standards Institution. Design of Steel Structures. Part 1-9: Fatigue Strength of
Steel Structures. BSI, London, EN 1993.
43. Trahair, N. S., Bradford, M. A. and Nethercot, D. A. (2001) The Behaviour and
Design of Steel Structures to BS 5950, 3rd edn. Spon, London.
44. Johnson, R. P. and Cafolla, J. (1977) Stiffness and strength of lateral restraints to
compressed flanges. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 42, No. 2, 73ÿ93.
45. Johnson, R. P. and Chen, S. (1991) Local buckling and moment redistribution in
Class 2 composite beams. Structural Engineering International, 1, No. 4, 27ÿ34.
46. Johnson, R. P. and Fan, C. K. R. (1988) Strength of continuous beams designed to
Eurocode 4. Proceedings of IABSE, Periodica 2/88, P-125/88, May, pp. 33ÿ44.
47. Johnson, R. P. and Huang, D. J. (1995) Composite bridge beams of mixed-class
cross-section. Structural Engineering International, 5, No. 2, 96ÿ101.
48. British Standards Institution (1990) Code of Practice for Design of Simple and Con-
tinuous Composite Beams. BSI, London, BS 5950-3-1.
49. Haensel, J. (1975) Effects of Creep and Shrinkage in Composite Construction. Institute
for Structural Engineering, Ruhr-Universität, Bochum, Report 75-12.
50. Johnson, R. P. and Hanswille, G. (1998) Analyses for creep of continuous steel and
composite bridge beams, according to EC4:Part 2. Structural Engineer, 76, No. 15,
294ÿ298.
51. Johnson, R. P. (1987) Shrinkage-induced curvature in cracked concrete flanges of
composite beams. Structural Engineer, 65B, Dec., 72ÿ77.
52. Guezouli, S. and Aribert, J.-M. (2006) Numerical investigation of moment redistribu-
tion in continuous beams of composite bridges. In: Leon, R. T. and Lange, J. (eds),
Composite Construction in Steel and Concrete V. American Society of Civil Engineers,
New York, pp. 47ÿ56.
53. British Standards Institution. Actions on Structures. Part 1-5: Thermal Actions. BSI,
London, EN 1991.
54. British Standards Institution (1997) Design of Composite Structures of Steel and
Concrete. Part 2: Bridges. BSI, London, BS DD ENV 1994.
55. Johnson, R. P. (2003) Cracking in concrete tension flanges of composite T-beams ÿ
tests and Eurocode 4. Structural Engineer, 81, No. 4, Feb., 29ÿ34.
56. Johnson, R. P. (2003) Analyses of a composite bowstring truss with tension stiffening.
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Bridge Engineering, 156, June,
63ÿ70.
57. Way, J. A. and Biddle, A. R. (1998) Integral Steel Bridges: Design of a Multi-span
Bridge ÿ Worked Example. Steel Construction Institute, Ascot, Publication 180.
58. Lawson, R. M. (1987) Design for Openings in the Webs of Composite Beams. Steel
Construction Institute, Ascot, Publication 068.

197
DESIGNERS’ GUIDE TO EN 1994-2

59. Lawson, R. M., Chung, K. F. and Price, A. M. (1992) Tests on composite beams with
large web openings. Structural Engineer, 70, Jan., 1ÿ7.
60. Johnson, R. P. and Huang, D. J. (1994) Calibration of safety factors M for composite
steel and concrete beams in bending. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers,
Structures and Buildings, 104, May, 193ÿ203.
61. Johnson, R. P. and Huang, D. J. (1997) Statistical calibration of safety factors for
encased composite columns. In: Buckner, C. D. and Sharooz, B. M. (eds), Composite
Construction in Steel and Concrete III, American Society of Civil Engineers, New
York, pp. 380ÿ391.
62. British Standards Institution (1997) Structural Use of Concrete. Part 1: Code of
Practice for Design and Construction. BSI, London, BS 8110.
63. Stark, J. W. B. (1984) Rectangular Stress Block for Concrete. Technical paper S16,
June. Drafting Committee for Eurocode 4 (unpublished).
64. Johnson, R. P. and Anderson, D. (1993) Designers’ Handbook to Eurocode 4. Thomas
Telford, London. [This handbook is for ENV 1994-1-1.]
65. Lääne, A. and Lebet, J.-P. (2005) Available rotation capacity of composite bridge
plate girders with negative moment and shear. Journal of Constructional Steelwork
Research, 61, 305ÿ327.
66. Johnson, R. P. and Willmington, R. T. (1972) Vertical shear in continuous composite
beams. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 53, Sept., 189ÿ205.
67. Allison, R. W., Johnson, R. P. and May, I. M. (1982) Tension-field action in
composite plate girders. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Part 2,
Research and Theory, 73, June, 255ÿ276.
68. Veljkovic, M. and Johansson, B. (2001) Design for buckling of plates due to direct
stress. In: Mäkeläinen, P., Kesti, J., Jutila, A. and Kaitila, O. (eds) Proceedings of
the 9th Nordic Steel Conference, Helsinki, 721ÿ729.
69. Lebet, J.-P. and Lääne, A. (2005) Comparison of shear resistance models with slender
composite beam test results. In: Hoffmeister, B. and Hechler, O. (eds), Eurosteel 2005,
vol. B. Druck und Verlagshaus Mainz, Aachen, pp. 4.3-33 to 4.3-40.
70. Ehmann, J. and Kuhlmann, U. (2006) Shear resistance of concrete bridge decks in
tension. In: Leon, R. T. and Lange, J. (eds), Composite Construction in Steel and
Concrete V. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, pp. 67ÿ76.
71. Johnson, R. P. and Fan, C. K. R. (1991) Distortional lateral buckling of continuous
composite beams. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Part 2, 91, Mar.,
131ÿ161.
72. Johnson, R. P. and Molenstra, N. (1990) Strength and stiffness of shear connections
for discrete U-frame action in composite plate girders. Structural Engineer, 68, Oct.,
386ÿ392.
73. Trahair, N. S. (1993) Flexural Torsional Buckling of Structures. E & FN Spon, London.
74. Johnson, R. P. and Buckby, R. J. (1986) Composite Structures of Steel and Concrete,
Vol. 2, Bridges, 2nd edn. Collins, London.
75. Johnson, R. P. and Molenstra, N. (1991) Partial shear connection in composite beams
for buildings. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Part 2, Research and
Theory, 91, 679ÿ704.
76. Johnson, R. P. and Oehlers, D. J. (1981) Analysis and design for longitudinal shear in
composite T-beams. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Part 2, Research
and Theory, 71, Dec., 989ÿ1021.
77. Menzies, J. B. (1971) CP 117 and shear connectors in steelÿconcrete composite beams.
Structural Engineer, 49, March, 137ÿ153.
78. Johnson, R. P. and Ivanov, R. I. (2001) Local effects of concentrated longitudinal
shear in composite bridge beams. Structural Engineer, 79, No. 5, 19ÿ23.
79. Oehlers, D. J. and Johnson, R. P. (1987) The strength of stud shear connections in
composite beams. Structural Engineer, 65B, June, 44ÿ48.
80. Roik, K., Hanswille, G. and Cunze-O. Lanna, A. (1989) Eurocode 4, Clause 6.3.2:
Stud Connectors. University of Bochum, Report EC4/8/88, March.

198
 REFERENCES

81. Stark, J. W. B. and van Hove, B. W. E. M. (1991) Statistical Analysis of Pushout Tests
on Stud Connectors in Composite Steel and Concrete Structures. TNO Building and
Construction Research, Delft, Report BI-91-163, Sept.
82. Kuhlmann, U. and Breuninger, U. (2002) Behaviour of horizontally lying studs with
longitudinal shear force. In: Hajjar, J. F., Hosain, M., Easterling, W. S. and Shahrooz,
B. M. (eds), Composite Construction in Steel and Concrete IV. American Society of
Civil Engineers, New York, pp. 438ÿ449.
83. Bridge, R. Q., Ernst, S., Patrick, M. and Wheeler, A. T. (2006) The behaviour and
design of haunches in composite beams and their reinforcement. In: Leon, R. T.
and Lange, J. (eds), Composite Construction in Steel and Concrete V. American
Society of Civil Engineers, New York, pp. 282ÿ292.
84. Johnson, R. P. and Oehlers, D. J. (1982) Design for longitudinal shear in composite
L-beams. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Part 2, Research and
Theory, 73, March, 147ÿ170.
85. Johnson, R. P. (2004) Composite Structures of Steel and Concrete, 3rd edn. Blackwell,
Oxford.
86. Bulson, P. S. (1970) The Stability of Flat Plates. Chatto & Windus, London.
87. Roik, K. and Bergmann, R. (1990) Design methods for composite columns with
unsymmetrical cross-sections. Journal of Constructional Steelwork Research, 15,
153ÿ168.
88. Wheeler, A. T. and Bridge, R. Q. (2002) Thin-walled steel tubes filled with high
strength concrete in bending. In: Hajjar, J. F., Hosain, M., Easterling, W. S. and
Shahrooz, B. M. (eds), Composite Construction in Steel and Concrete IV. American
Society of Civil Engineers, New York, pp. 584ÿ595.
89. Kilpatrick, A. and Rangan, V. (1999) Tests on high-strength concrete-filled tubular
steel columns. ACI Structural Journal, Mar.ÿApr., Title No. 96-S29, 268ÿ274. Amer-
ican Concrete Institute, Detroit.
90. May, I. M. and Johnson, R. P. (1978) Inelastic analysis of biaxially restrained
columns. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Part 2, Research and
Theory, 65, June, 323ÿ337.
91. Roik, K. and Bergmann, R. (1992) Composite columns. In: Dowling, P. J., Harding,
J. L. and Bjorhovde, R. (eds), Constructional Steel Design ÿ an International Guide.
Elsevier, London and New York, pp. 443ÿ469.
92. Bergmann, R. and Hanswille, G. (2006) New design method for composite columns
including high strength steel. In: Leon, R. T. and Lange, J. (eds), Composite Con-
struction in Steel and Concrete V. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York,
pp. 381ÿ389.
93. Chen, W. F. and Lui, E. M. (1991) Stability Design of Steel Frames. CRC Press, Boca
Raton, Florida.
94. Bondale, D. S. and Clark, P. J. (1967) Composite construction in the Almondsbury
interchange. Proceedings of a Conference on Structural Steelwork, British Construc-
tional Steelwork Association, London, pp. 91ÿ100.
95. Virdi, K. S. and Dowling, P. J. (1980) Bond strength in concrete-filled tubes. Proceed-
ings of IABSE, Periodica 3/80, P-33/80, Aug., 125ÿ139.
96. Kerensky, O. A. and Dallard, N. J. (1968) The four-level interchange between M4 and
M5 motorways at Almondsbury. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 40,
295ÿ321.
97. Johnson, R. P. (2000) Resistance of stud shear connectors to fatigue. Journal of
Constructional Steel Research, 56, 101ÿ116.
98. Oehlers, D. J. and Bradford, M. (1995) Composite Steel and Concrete Structural
Members ÿ Fundamental Behaviour. Elsevier Science, Oxford.
99. Gomez Navarro, M. (2002) Influence of concrete cracking on the serviceability limit
state design of steel-reinforced concrete composite bridges: tests and models. In:
J. Martinez Calzon (ed.), Composite Bridges ÿ Proceedings of the 3rd International
Meeting, Spanish Society of Civil Engineers, Madrid, pp. 261ÿ278.

199
DESIGNERS’ GUIDE TO EN 1994-2

100. Pucher, A. (1977) Influence Surfaces of Elastic Plates. Springer-Verlag Wien, New
York.
101. Kuhlmann, U. (1997) Design, calculation and details of tied-arch bridges in composite
constructions. In: Buckner, C. D. and Sharooz, B. M. (eds), Composite Construction in
Steel and Concrete III, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, pp. 359ÿ369.
102. Monnickendam, A. (2003) The design, construction and performance of Newark
Dyke railway bridge. Proceedings of a Symposium on Structures for High-speed
Railway Transportation, Antwerp. IABSE, Zurich. Reports, 87, 42ÿ43.
103. British Standards Institution. Actions on Structures. Part 1-4: General Actions ÿ Wind
actions. BSI, London, EN 1991.
104. Randl, E. and Johnson, R. P. (1982) Widths of initial cracks in concrete tension
flanges of composite beams. Proceedings of IABSE, Periodica 4/82, P-54/82, Nov.,
69ÿ80.
105. Johnson, R. P. and Allison, R. W. (1983) Cracking in concrete tension flanges of
composite T-beams. Structural Engineer, 61B, Mar., 9ÿ16.
106. Roik, K., Hanswille, G. and Cunze-O. Lanna, A. (1989) Report on Eurocode 4, Clause
5.3, Cracking of Concrete. University of Bochum, Report EC4/4/88.
107. Johnson, R. P. (2003) Cracking in concrete flanges of composite T-beams ÿ tests and
Eurocode 4. Structural Engineer, 81, No. 4, 29ÿ34.
108. Schmitt, V., Seidl, G. and Hever, M. (2005) Composite bridges with VFT-WIB
construction method. In: Hoffmeister, B. and Hechler, O. (eds), Eurosteel 2005,
vol. B. Druck und Verlagshaus Mainz, Aachen, pp. 4.6-79 to 4.6-83.
109. Yandzio, E. and Iles, D. C. (2004) Precast Concrete Decks for Composite Highway
Bridges. Steel Construction Institute, Ascot, Publication 316.
110. Calzon, J. M. (2005). Practice in present-day steel and composite structures. In:
Hoffmeister, B. and Hechler, O. (eds), Eurosteel 2005, vol. A. Druck und Verlagshaus
Mainz, Aachen, pp. 0-11 to 0-18.
111. Doeinghaus, P., Dudek, M. and Sprinke, P. (2004) Innovative hybrid double-
composite bridge with prestressing. In: Pre-Conference Proceedings, Composite
Construction in Steel and Concrete V, United Engineering Foundation, New York,
Session E4, paper 1.
112. Department of Transport (now Highways Agency) DoT (1987) Use of BS 5400:Part
5:1979. London, Departmental Standard BD 16/82.
113. Moffat, K. R. and Dowling, P. J. (1978) The longitudinal bending behaviour of
composite box girder bridges having incomplete interaction. Structural Engineer,
56B, No. 3, 53ÿ60.
114. Kuhlmann, U. and Kürschner, K. (2001) Behavior of lying shear studs in reinforced
concrete slabs. In: Eligehausen, R. (ed.), Connections between Steel and Concrete.
RILEM Publications S.A.R.L., Bagneux, France, pp. 1076ÿ1085.
115. Kuhlmann, U. and Kürschner, K. (2006) Structural behavior of horizontally lying
shear studs. In: Leon, R. T. and Lange, J. (eds), Composite Construction in Steel
and Concrete V. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, pp. 534ÿ543.

200
Index

Notes: references to ‘beams’ and to ‘columns’ are to composite members; cross-references to EN 1992
and EN 1993 are too numerous to be indexed

action effect see actions, effects of of frames 29

actions 6, 8 rigid-plastic 8
accidental 56 second-order 8, 31ÿ4, 38, 64ÿ5, 94, 140ÿ1
arrangement of 62ÿ4 uncracked 50ÿ1
combinations of 3, 6, 11, 15, 31, 62ÿ4 see also cracking of concrete; loading, elastic
characteristic 46 critical
for serviceability 164ÿ6, 171 analysis, local 183ÿ4
frequent 48, 64, 153 analysis, rigorous 39
infrequent 164 Annex, National see National Annex
quasi-permanent 48 annexes, informative 2, 4ÿ5, 191ÿ2
effects of 8 application rules 7
de-composition of 51ÿ2 arches see bridges, tied-arch
envelopes of 63 assumptions in Eurocodes 7
global with local axes 8ÿ9
and fatigue 156, 161
and serviceability 165, 174ÿ5, 177ÿ8 beams
at failure 56ÿ7, 72 axial force in 81, 83ÿ4, 86ÿ9, 105, 111,
in composite plates 184ÿ5 161ÿ2
independent 136ÿ7 bending resistance of 67ÿ84
local 161, 165, 183ÿ4 hogging 73ÿ4, 77ÿ9, 83
primary 12, 48, 168 sagging 72ÿ3, 83
secondary 12, 48 cantilever 68, 125
second-order 31, 33ÿ4, 103, 107, 141ÿ2, Class of 12, 57ÿ60
149, 185 concrete-encased 4, 52, 59, 68, 89
indirect 12, 44, 60, 138, 170ÿ1 concrete flange of 13, 71, 109
permanent 15ÿ16 cross-sections of 67ÿ89
temperature 48, 120 Class 1 or 2 118ÿ20
see also fatigue load models; forces, and axial force 83
concentrated; loading and filler beams 53
analysis, elastic, of cross-sections see beams; and global analysis 36
columns; etc. and indirect actions 44ÿ5
analysis, global 8, 29ÿ66 and reinforcement 20
cracked 50ÿ1 and resistance to bending 69
elastic 30, 36ÿ7, 40, 42ÿ53 and serviceability 163, 170
elasto-plastic 137 and vertical shear 80
finite-element 31, 34, 39, 93, 111 Class 3 37, 108
first-order 31ÿ3, 38 Class 3 and 4 20, 80ÿ2, 103, 163
grillage 52ÿ3 Class 4 77ÿ9, 85ÿ9, 94, 97, 107
non-linear 8, 36, 56, 72, 138, 185 classification of 29, 37, 57ÿ61, 71, 82
of filler-beam decks 52ÿ3 elastic analysis of 58ÿ9, 69, 75ÿ7
DESIGNERS’ GUIDE TO EN 1994-2

beams – cross-sections of (continued ) lateral-torsional 31, 34, 45, 67, 76ÿ7, 90ÿ104,
plastic analysis of 36 111, 138
sudden change in 120ÿ1, 186 local 37ÿ8, 57ÿ9, 76, 127, 137
curved in plan 4, 68ÿ9, 89 see also beams, Class of
curved in elevation 69, 114 of plates 29, 37ÿ8, 184ÿ5
flexural stiffness of 46 of webs in shear 68, 80, 82
haunched 102, 117, 122, 126ÿ7, 189 see also bending moments, elastic critical;
of non-uniform section 4 filler beams
shear connection for see shear connection
shear resistance of 67, 79ÿ83 cables 4, 23
see also analysis; buckling; cantilevers; camber 166
cracking of concrete; deflections; filler cement, hydration of 175ÿ6
beams; flange, effective width of; see also cracking of concrete
imperfections; interaction; shear . . . ; CEN (Comité Européen Normalisation) 1ÿ2
slabs, concrete; vibration; webs Class of section see beams, cross-sections of
bearings 11, 15, 62, 64, 141, 145 class, structural 26ÿ7
bedding see slabs, precast concrete Codes of Practice, see British Standards;
bending, bi-axial 71 EN . . .
bending moments columns 64ÿ6, 136ÿ50, 164
accumulation of 12 analysis of 29, 140ÿ3
and axial force 59, 68, 102ÿ3 axially loaded 144
elastic critical 93 bending resistance of 71
in columns 142ÿ3 bi-axial bending in 140, 143, 146
redistribution of 18, 37, 53 concrete-encased 4, 138, 145
bolts, holes for 68 concrete-filled 4, 144ÿ50
bolts, stiffness of 30, 37ÿ8 cross-sections of
bond see shear connection interaction diagram for 138ÿ9
box girders 82 non-symmetrical 33, 47, 136
distortion of 68ÿ9 design methods for 31, 137ÿ43
shear connection for 116, 118 effective stiffness of 33, 137, 140, 149
torsion in 45ÿ6, 72 moment-shear interaction in 139, 148
see also composite plates out-of-plumb 65ÿ6
bracing, lateral 35ÿ6, 69, 91, 111ÿ3, 115 second-order effects in 138
and buckling 97 shear in 139, 145
and slip of bolts 38ÿ9 squash load of 138, 140, 147
stiffness of 96ÿ9, 102ÿ4 steel contribution ratio for 136, 140, 147
breadth of flange, effective see flange, effective transverse loading on 143
width of see also buckling; bending moments; cracking
Bridge Code (BS 5400) 1, 39, 56, 59, 70, 89, of concrete; creep of concrete; length,
104 effective; imperfections; loading, elastic
bridges critical; load introduction;
cable-supported 4, 23, 40 reinforcement; shear connection;
durability of see corrosion; durability slenderness, relative; stresses, residual
for pedestrians 151 composite action, double 4, 183, 189
integral 31, 33, 36, 68, 72, 105, 115 composite bridges, see bridges; Bridge Code
railway 151 composite plates 4, 183ÿ8
strengthening of 114 compression members 136ÿ50
tied-arch 35, 161ÿ2, 189 see also columns
U-frame 30 concrete
see also box girders; filler beams compaction of 124ÿ5
British Standards lightweight-aggregate 17, 19, 22, 136, 152
BS 5400, see Bridge Code over-strength of 47, 50, 118ÿ9
BS 5950 39, 59 partial factors for 13ÿ14
BS 8110 70 precast 27ÿ8, 62
buckling properties of 17ÿ19
distortional lateral 35, 91, 105ÿ7 spalling of 4
flange-induced 68, 114 strength classes for 17ÿ18, 26
flexural 77, 89, 184ÿ5 strength of 13, 17ÿ18, 70
in columns 34, 136, 140ÿ2 stress block for 18, 70ÿ1, 138
lateral 95 thermal expansion of 22

202
 INDEX

see also cracking of concrete; creep of durability 25ÿ8, 179

concrete; elasticity, modulus of;
prestress; shrinkage of concrete; slabs effective length see length, effective
connecting devices 20ÿ1 effective width see beams; flanges; slabs,
connections, see joints composite
connector modulus, see shear connectors, effect of action see actions, effects of
stiffness of eigenvalue see loading, elastic critical
construction 3, 47ÿ8, 103ÿ4, 164, 166 elasticity, modulus of
loads 6, 12 for concrete 18, 33, 140
methods of 12, 180 for shear 45
propped 121, 171 EN 1090 7, 185
unpropped 12, 76, 91ÿ3, 121 EN 10025 60, 72, 146
see also erection of steelwork EN 13670 5, 7, 180
Construction Products Directive 14 EN 13918 23, 122
contraflexure, points of 32, 35 EN 1990 v, 2, 6, 14ÿ15, 25, 29, 48, 56, 164
corrosion 25, 27 EN 1991 v, 2, 6, 12, 48, 151, 166
at steel-concrete interface 27ÿ8, 127, 181 EN 1992 v, 2, 5
of reinforcement 25ÿ7 EN 1993 v, 2, 6
cover 25ÿ7, 89ÿ90, 138, 145 EN 1994-1-1 v, 2
cracking of concrete 46, 152ÿ4, 167ÿ73 EN 1994-2 v, 2
and global analysis 29, 32, 36, 46ÿ7, 50, EN 1998 3, 7
52ÿ3 ENV 1994-1-1 5, 137
and longitudinal shear 47, 118 environmental class see exposure class
control of 163, 173 equilibrium, static 15ÿ16
load-induced 169ÿ70, 175 erection of steelwork 7, 39
restraint-induced 168ÿ9, 175ÿ7 European Standard see EN . . .
early thermal 167ÿ8, 172ÿ3, 175ÿ6 examples
in columns 47, 140, 141, 145 bending and vertical shear 104ÿ11
creep coefficient 19, 42ÿ3, 53ÿ4, 140 block connector with hoop 116ÿ8
creep multiplier 42ÿ3 composite beam, continuous 60ÿ2, 104ÿ11
creep of concrete 12, 17, 19, 32, 42ÿ5, 53 composite column 136, 145ÿ50
in columns 45, 140, 147 concrete-filled tube 145ÿ50
secondary effects of 44 control of crack width 175ÿ7
see also modular ratio; elasticity, modulus of cross bracing 111ÿ3
cross-sections see beams, cross-sections of; distortional lateral buckling 105ÿ8
columns, cross-sections of effective width 41ÿ2
curves, buckling resistance 34 elastic resistance to bending 77ÿ9
fatigue 157ÿ61
damage, cumulative 153, 155ÿ6 in-plane shear in a concrete flange 130ÿ1
see also factors, damage equivalent longitudinal shear 131ÿ4
damping factor 166ÿ7 lying studs 192ÿ4
definitions 8 modular ratios 53ÿ4
deflections see deformations plastic resistance to bending 72ÿ3
deformations 166 resistance to bending and shear 85ÿ6, 104ÿ11
limits to 163 with axial compression 86ÿ9, 107ÿ8
deformation, imposed 12, 44, 49, 90 serviceability stresses 173ÿ5, 177ÿ8
design, basis of 11ÿ16 shear connection for box girder 187ÿ8
design, methods of see beams; columns; slabs; etc. shrinkage effects 54ÿ6
design, mixed-class 36ÿ7 transverse reinforcement 130ÿ1
Designers’ guides v, 2 execution see construction
to EN 1990 14 exposure classes 26ÿ7, 164ÿ5, 167, 175
to EN 1993ÿ2 35, 58, 68ÿ9, 72, 77, 79, 82, 95,
104, 113, 114, 118 factors, combination 6, 48ÿ9, 56ÿ7
to EN 1994-1-1 60, 73, 93, 136 factors, damage equivalent 156, 161
diaphragms 115ÿ6 factors, partial see partial factors
dimensions 14 factors, reduction 92ÿ3, 95
dispersion, angle of 113, 120 fatigue 15ÿ16, 137, 150ÿ61
distortion of cross sections 68, 72, 82, 184 analysis for 37
ductility see reinforcement, fracture of; load models for 150, 153, 157ÿ61
structural steels of joints 30

203
DESIGNERS’ GUIDE TO EN 1994-2

fatigue (continued ) limit states

of reinforcement 19ÿ20, 154ÿ5, 159ÿ61 serviceability 6, 37, 56, 163ÿ78
of shear connectors 47, 150, 155ÿ6, 183, 191 STR (structural failure) 67
of structural steel 27, 90, 127, 150ÿ1, 154, ultimate 56, 67ÿ162
157 loading 12
partial factors for 14, 151ÿ2 arrangement of 31
filler beams 29, 52ÿ3, 60, 89ÿ91, 166, 173 construction 12
finite-element methods 68, 93ÿ4, 104, 115 elastic critical 31ÿ3
see also analysis, global for beams 97ÿ102
fire, resistance to 25, 163 for columns 140, 147ÿ8
flanges for composite plates 185
concrete see beams; slabs wheel 56ÿ7, 84, 165, 183, 185
effective width of 39ÿ41, 68, 111 see also actions
plastic bending resistance of 82 load introduction
steel 104, 186 in columns 136, 144ÿ5, 149ÿ50
flow charts v in tension members 161ÿ2
for classification of sections 57 lying studs see studs, lying
for compression members 141
for control of cracking 171ÿ2 materials, properties of 17ÿ23
for global analysis 46, 62ÿ6 see also concrete; steel; etc.
for lateral buckling 96 mesh, welded see reinforcement, welded
forces, concentrated 114, 120ÿ1 mesh
forces, internal 137 modular ratio 42ÿ3, 53ÿ4
formwork, permanent 62, 179ÿ81 modulus of elasticity see elasticity, modulus
formwork, re-usable 76 of
foundations 7, 16 moment of area, torsional second 46
fracture toughness 12 moments see bending moments; torsion
frame, inverted-U 35, 93, 95ÿ8, 101, 106,
109ÿ11 nationally determined parameter 1ÿ2, 62, 84,
frames, composite 8, 35, 64ÿ6, 141 91
braced 47 National Annexes 1, 3, 11, 56
see also analysis, global; buckling; and actions 48, 56, 153, 158ÿ9, 164, 169
imperfections and analysis, global 56, 58
and beams 38
geometrical data 15 and columns 138
see also imperfections and combination factors 48
girders see beams; box girders and materials 13, 20, 22, 59, 61, 70, 146
ground-structure interaction 30 and partial factors 116, 151
see also bridges, integral and resistances 95, 124, 128, 156ÿ7
and serviceability 27, 164, 166ÿ7, 173ÿ5
haunches see beams, haunched and shear connectors 125, 166
Highways Agency 1 national choice 2
hole-in-web method 58, 59ÿ60, 73, 80 national standards 1
NDPs 1ÿ2
impact factor 160 normative rules 2ÿ3
imperfections 7, 14, 29, 31ÿ2, 33ÿ6 notation see symbols
and lateral buckling 91 notes, in Eurocodes 1, 12
in columns 65, 138, 141, 143
in plates 185 partial factors 2, 3, 9ÿ16
interaction, partial and full 69 for fatigue 14, 151ÿ2, 156
ISO standards 5, 8 F , for actions 6, 15, 19, 45, 51, 55
italic type, use of vÿvi M , for materials and resistances 13ÿ15, 92,
165, 192
jacking, see prestress plastic theory see analysis, global, rigid-plastic;
joints 22, 30 beams, cross-sections of, Class 1 and 2
between precast slabs 181 plate girders see beams
stiffness of 38 plates, buckling of see buckling
plates, composite 41, 72, 126, 164, 183ÿ8
length, effective 34, 64, 136, 143 plates, orthotropic 52
see also slenderness, relative Poisson’s ratio 46, 144

204
 INDEX

prestress 4, 8 see also fatigue; load introduction;

by jacking at supports 4, 8, 12, 49 reinforcement, in beams, transverse;
by tendons 49, 77, 155, 167 shear connectors; slip, longitudinal
transverse 4 shear connectors 115, 156
principles 4, 7, 12 and splitting see studs, lying
propping see construction, methods of angle 5, 115
provisions, general 2 bi-axial loading of 185, 188
push tests see shear connectors, tests on block with hoop 5, 114, 116ÿ7
channel 5
quality, control of 26 ductility of 114
fatigue strength of 151, 191
redistribution see bending moments; shear, flexibility of see stiffness of
longitudinal force limits for 151, 165ÿ6
references, normative 5ÿ7 in young concrete 166
reference standards 3, 5ÿ7 partial factors for 14
regulatory bodies 12 perforated plate 22
reinforcement 9, 19ÿ21, 22 spacing of 59, 91, 119, 124ÿ5, 162, 180, 184ÿ5,
and lying studs 190ÿ1 187ÿ8
ductility of 20, 59, 71 stiffness of 18, 69, 164, 186ÿ7
fracture of 21ÿ2, 59 tension in 115
in beams tests on 5, 189
for crack control 167ÿ73 types of 5, 22
for shrinkage 19 see also studs, welded
minimum area of 59, 168ÿ9, 176ÿ7 shear flow 116, 118
transverse 115, 124, 127ÿ30 shear lag see width, effective
in columns 138, 145ÿ6 shear, longitudinal 47, 68, 114, 118ÿ21, 127ÿ30
in composite plates 186 see also columns, shear in; composite plates;
in compression 70 shear connection; shear flow
in filler-beam decks 90 shear, punching 84, 184
in haunches see beams, haunched shear ratio 100
yielding of 39 shear, vertical 29
welded mesh (fabric) 19ÿ21, 59, 71 and bending moment 80ÿ3, 87
see also cover; fatigue and lying studs 191, 193
resistances 14 in deck slabs 84, 184
see also beams, bending resistance of; etc. in filler-beam decks 91
restraints, lateral see bracing, lateral see also buckling
rotation capacity 12, 22, 58 shrinkage of concrete 19, 53
see also joints and cracking 169ÿ70, 174ÿ5
autogenous 19, 55, 144, 147
safety factors see partial factors effects of 35, 45, 165ÿ6, 172
scope of EN 1994-2 4ÿ5, 36, 136, 138 in tension members 50
section modulus 8 modified by creep 43ÿ4, 54ÿ6
sections see beams; columns; etc. primary 12, 54ÿ6, 76, 120, 133ÿ4
separation 8, 115, 124 secondary 12, 134
serviceability see limit states see also cracking of concrete
settlement 12, 30 situations, design 165
shakedown 153ÿ4 skew 89
shear see columns, shear in; shear, longitudinal; slabs, concrete 53
shear, vertical; etc. reinforcement in 125
shear connection 2, 8, 68, 114ÿ35 splitting in 115, 123ÿ4, 189ÿ93
and execution 124ÿ5 see also plates, composite
and U-frame action 93, 111 slabs, precast concrete 115, 125ÿ7, 179ÿ81
by adhesives 23, 114 slenderness, relative
by bond or friction 23, 114, 136, 144, 149ÿ50, for beams 92, 94, 97, 101ÿ2
190 for columns 136, 140, 147ÿ8
design of 82, 155 slip capacity 114
detailing of 124ÿ7, 180, 189ÿ93 slip, longitudinal 8, 38ÿ9, 69, 166
for box girders 185ÿ8 in columns 138, 144
full or partial 69 in composite plates 184, 186ÿ7
in columns 144ÿ5, 149ÿ50 software for EN 1994 32ÿ3, 75, 94

205
DESIGNERS’ GUIDE TO EN 1994-2

splices 38, 118 subscripts 8ÿ9

squash load see columns, squash load of superposition, principle of 31
stability see equilibrium, static support, lateral see bracing, lateral
standards see British Standards; EN . . . sway 142
standards, harmonised 14 symbols 8ÿ9, 13ÿ14, 20
steel see reinforcing steel; structural steel;
yielding of steel temperature, effects of 48ÿ9, 53, 153
steel contribution ratio see columns temporary structures 11
steelwork, protection of see durability tendons see prestress
stiffeners, longitudinal 59, 82, 185 tension field 79ÿ80
stiffeners, transverse web 35, 68ÿ9, 93, 97, 116 tension members 23, 49ÿ52, 161ÿ2
stiffness, effective, of reinforcement 51 tension stiffening
stiffness, flexural see beams; columns; etc. and cracking 47, 169ÿ70
stiffness, torsional 45ÿ6 and longitudinal shear 118ÿ9, 162
strength of a material 13ÿ14 and stresses 154ÿ5, 160, 165, 173ÿ5
characteristic 13, 15 and tension members 50ÿ1
see also resistance testing see shear connectors
stress block for concrete 13 tolerances 14, 49, 180ÿ1
stresses torsion 45ÿ6, 68, 72, 91, 163, 184
accumulation of 12, 81, 84, 86 traffic, road, type of 160
bearing 144 truss analogy 128
design, at serviceability limit state 164ÿ6 trusses, members in 49, 136ÿ7, 140
in concrete 26, 165, 177ÿ8 and buckling 95
in reinforcement 165 and effective widths 41
in steel 165, 177 tubes, steel see columns, concrete-filled
equivalent, in steel 72, 185
excessive 164 U-frame see frame, inverted-U
fatigue 150ÿ1 units 189
mid-plane, in steel 76ÿ7 uplift see separation
residual, in steel 31, 34ÿ5, 141
shrinkage see shrinkage of concrete variables, basic 12
temperature see temperature, effects of vibration 163, 166ÿ7
stress range, damage equivalent 155ÿ7
stress resultant see actions, effects of warping, resistance to 72, 118, 163, 184
structural steels 20ÿ2 webs
partial factors for 9, 14ÿ15 breathing of 166
thermal expansion of 22 effective area of 37ÿ8
strut, pin-ended 32 holes in 68, 90
studs, lying 115, 123ÿ4, 189ÿ93 transverse forces on 113ÿ4
studs, welded 3, 22ÿ3, 121ÿ3 see also hole-in-web method; shear,
detailing of 127, 189ÿ93 vertical
ductility of 120 web stiffeners see stiffeners, transverse web
length after welding 122 width, effective 29, 183ÿ4
resistance of 121ÿ2, 189, 191 see also beams; flanges, effective width of
tension in 123 worked examples see examples
weld collar of 23, 115, 122ÿ3
see also fatigue; shear connection, detailing yielding of steel 37
of; shear connectors

206