Ctakin@dicle - Edu.tr Yildirim@dicle - Edu.tr
Ctakin@dicle - Edu.tr Yildirim@dicle - Edu.tr
Ctakin@dicle - Edu.tr Yildirim@dicle - Edu.tr
ABSTRACT
For the sustainability of historical towns and traditional buildings those are no longer
feasible, an adaptive use must be given. This adaptive use must be convenient with socio-
economic and cultural structure of the historical site. The most popular way for the
maintenance of the historical site is tourism activity.
The case study held on for this reason is the historical town of Diyarbakır. The main civil
architecture examples inside the walls are the traditional houses which are relevant with
user requirements, desirability; habits of users connected with socio-economic and socio-
cultural values. Social experience, visions, believes, ethical principles are sourced from
nature and living styles have affected the traditional Diyarbakır housing architecture. The
reflections of culture and civilization with integration of environment and material in
physical space can be seen in traditional Diyarbakır houses. Climatic conditions and social
structure have played an important role in the forms of the interior and exterior spaces of
the traditional Diyarbakır houses. There are few examples of restored houses in the old
town. Some of them have become museum being due to the birth place of very popular
writers and poets in them. The large houses which oriented for the patriarchal family style
lost their function in the contemporary life style. Some of them can not be conserved as a
house as before because of being too large for a small family.
The aim of the study is to preserve those structures for a sustainable conservation and the
very convenient way to do it is using tourism. In order to give an adaptive use for these
structures the analysis of the existing structures has to be made and the requirements of the
tourism innovations have to be considered.
1.Introduction
The region of Suriçi of Diyarbakır which shows a medieval town style became a slum area
because of being a settlement for the marginal groups migrated from rural and being left by
the real owners. The historical town is far away to provide the contemporary comfort
conditions related with the user requirements. The high population pressure causes
deterioration in the traditional houses. For the sustainability and regional development, the
cultural heritage in the historical town must be preserved and transfer to the future. One of
the tools of the sustainability is the tourism.
The religious structures in the historical town can be preserved more easily because of the
belief. The traditional houses due to the civil architecture are going to be disappeared
because of the lost of using values. One of the activity which is going to help to make the
historical town as a charming center is a restricted tourism activity.
Although it is not known that when the historical city has established, the inner castle is
thought to be the first settlement due to A. Gabriel. In the south part of the inner castle
there was an amphitheater dated to VI century which does not exist now. Although the
domed basilica in the inner castle reflects the architecture of VI. Century, there is no any
evidence of its authentic architecture.
The most important structure defines the character of the historical city is the wall. The two
way axles reached today which connects to the four gates intersects at the center of the city
and forms the city plan of Hellenistic and Roman (Fig1). This city plan has changed in the
Byzantine and Islamic civilization times and reached to today as a two way axles.
Fig.1. Map of the historical city Diyarbakır Suriçi shows the city plan remaining from the
Hellenistic Era.
Near the intersection point of these ways, a square of religion, trade and education center
has formed as in all Ottoman cities. These structures are the Great Mosque, Hasan Pasha
Inn, the Madrasah of Mesudiye and Zinciriye.
The Great Mosque has been researched widely in Turkey because of including the
structural elements of antique Christian Era, assumed to be a church and with the thought
of being the remaining of a palace dated to 1. Century B.C. The closed plan of the mosque
repeats the plan of Damascus Emevi Mosque.
The arc profiles on the arcades of first floor are common in the traditions of Islam and
Christian structures. Zinciriye Madrasah is at the south west part of the Great Mosque and
also known as Sincariye Madrasah. The structure is due to the Great Mosque Complex and
assumed to be the structure of complementary of Mesudiye Madrasah. The arcades
surrounds the courtyard is due to the Syrian structure traditions. Mesudiye Madrasah has
recently restored. The two storey Hasan Pasha Inn which has spaces behind the arcades is
also in the opposite side of the Greta Mosque. The structure recently restored by Mr.
Yildirim, has three entrances, one of them from the west to the Gazi Street and the others
from the east and south to the Jewelers Bazaar. The simplicity is coming out in the
Ottoman Era Inn structures and the relations with outside is redoubled. The form of the Inn
is far away from a form of a castle and there are shops outside of it. The structure is used
for the trade activity also. It differs from the inn style of Seljuk inns with the parameters of
proportion and elevation architecture. The spaces get smaller for the benefit of human.
In the Turkish house the rooms are the spaces responds the multiple functions. In each
room, the activities of sleeping, eating and seating are realized. In the first floor, some of
the rooms extend to the street with a console called Cardak. The winter side has generally
one storey and oriented to the south. There is not any fire place in the room. The only
fireplace is located in kitchen and the winter house is near the kitchen. The flooring of
winter house is brick dust mortar (horasan).
Figure 2. The Section Elevation of Cahit Sıtkı Tarancı Museum Poet, M.Yildirim
Figure 3. A view from the Cahit Sıtkı Tarancı House
Figure 5. The Section Elevation of the Figure 6. A view from the house in Kursunlu
house in Kurşunlu Cami Street. (M.yildirim) Street
Generally the openings of winter rooms are oriented to south and seasonal parts of houses
are oriented to west and east. The most preferred place for use is Iwan (Eyvan) that is
surrounded by seasonal parts and opened to courtyard with a big arch or arches. It is
constructed 2 or 3 sectional arcades (figure 7,8). It can be also located in first floor and it is
the most preferred place of household especially in summer. The other characteristic of
eyvan is a semi open transition element between courtyard and spaces.
The proposed new functions can be such as production and sale of handcraft and souvenir,
rehabilitation centers for children, youth center, those are suitable for housing usage as
well. While some adaptive uses have given, some issues must be taken into consideration:
• gaining these 100-150 years buildings which lose partly their function world
tourism and world cultural heritage, by giving new functions to them
• conservation of these buildings providing new usage,
• conservation of historical environment,
• by distinguishing different functional groups according to necessities considering
location and size of the buildings in the historical town by means of building
determination work
• economical evaluation
• The necessity of giving new function to buildings those do not meet the need due to
changing social environment
6.Conclusions
The fundamental principle in conservation of traditional buildings is to provide the usage
continuity. This usage continuity can be provided by compensating contemporary user
requirements within existing traditional buildings. Some additions and finishing will be
obligatory as a result of evaluation of user requirements of today in buildings. The
buildings must be arranged for providing possibility of reuse. The analysis of requirements
of region must be taken into consideration while these arrangements have done. On the
other hand, it must be remembered that tourism factor has a positive and negative effects
(figure 9) on citizens and buildings as well. Although the positive impacts on economy and
culture, positive and negative impacts can be seen in socio-economic, sustainability of
buildings and social structure so these negative and positive effects must be optimized as
well.
Positive
Positive Economic
Socio/Economic
Negative Impact
Impact
Socio/Economic
Impact
CULTURAL
TOURISM
Positive/Negative
Social
Impact
The reuse of the buildings by relevant techniques can not be applied only in building scale
also in historical town scale. The other structures that have already lost their original uses
and no longer feasible in the medieval town are the hamams, the inns and old bazaar where
the hand crafts production are made must be preserved. For example, by means of
production of some touristic handcrafts and selling them inside, restaurants or hostels in
those traditional houses in order to get the authentic atmosphere.
REFERENCES
Balcar. M. and D. Pearce, 1996, Tourism and The Wet Coast of New Zealand, Tourism
Management 17:214.
Bob McKeicher, Hilary du Cross, 2002. Cultural Tourism: The Partnership Between
Tourism and Cultural Heritage Management, The Haworth Hospitality Press, New York.
Deepak Chhabra, 2003, Annals of Tourism Research, Vol :30No :3 pp.702-719
Gabriel, Albert. 1940. Voyages Archeologiques dans La Turquie Orientale. Paris.
Ramsay, W.M. 1962. The Historical Geography of Asia Minor. Amsterdam: Hakkert-
Publisher.
Tuncer, Orhan, Cezmi. 1999. Diyarbakır Evleri. Ankara: Diyarbakır Büyükşehir
Belediyesi Yayınları.
Ulusoy, Zuhal, 1994, “Kentsel Korumanın Fiziksel ve Toplumsal Boyutları”, 2nd
Colloqium Of Urban Conservation Renewal and Implementation, İstanbul, Mimar Sinan
Üniversitesi.
Richards, G.1996 Production and Consumption of European Cultural Tourism. Annals of
Tourism Research 23:261–283
Urry, J.1990 The Tourist Gaze. London: Sage.Weiler, B., and C. Hall eds. 1992 Special
Interest Tourism. London: Belhaven.
Boissevain, J.1996 Introduction. In Coping with Tourists, J. Boissevain, ed., pp. 1–26.
Oxford: Berghahn Books.