0% found this document useful (0 votes)
167 views7 pages

Edphilosophy

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 7

Rhys Barnes–Yu

MUS 2440 Larson


January 30, 2019
Philosophy Statement

I believe that every child should have the opportunity to be able to participate in a

multicultural, multi-faceted approach to music education which should strive to develop them

musically and extra-musically through the use of analog and digital technology, classical

western and non-western repertoire, and participatory activities outside of the traditional

ensemble which increase their creativity, musical knowledge, and cultural awareness.

Furthermore, I believe that the autonomy of children matters and that children learn best

when given a say in curriculum and classroom rules. Lastly, I believe that children learn most

effectively when learning mimics play.

In my opinion, there are [3] main components to a maximally effective learning

environment: (1) An effective learning partnership between teacher and student. (2)

Curricular, classroom management, and disciplinary systems which consider factors such as

students’ home life and learning/behavioral disabilities. (3) An environment which fosters

creativity, autonomy, and participation; is a safe place where mistakes and failures are

opportunities to learn and grow; and is connected to technology and the world outside of

school.

A Learning Partnership

An effective learning partnership between teacher and student hinges on the concept

of mutual respect. Students should respect teachers, but teachers should also respect students.

Respect is to be given freely and should not have to be earned. In addition, both student and

teacher should be learning from each other. While students obviously receive knowledge,

1
wisdom, and instruction from teachers, we also can empower our students as teachers and can

learn quite a few things from our students if we keep our minds open every day. Teachers

should strive to have a close relationship with students, respect them, know them well, care

genuinely about them, and value their opinions.

Social Consciousness

Classroom management and discipline should consider students’ home life and other

extracurricular factors such as learning/behavioral disabilities and social/societal factors. One

cannot claim that they can simply not see these things (i.e. claim one is “[insert demographic

here]-blind”), and that they treat all students the same. We are all affected by the system

which is in itself, biased. We as teachers are called to recognise and address biases in the

system as well as other factors which can affect student behaviour. For example, students

may act out due to lack of food at home. For a student like that, having snacks handy can be a

useful classroom management technique. Another student may have ADHD. For that student,

allowing the student to doodle, fidget, or play soft music in class may be beneficial.

On the disciplinary side, some students may need alternate punishments. For example,

a student with ADHD may not be able to sit isolated to reset themselves in the same way

another student may be able to, or a student with chronic pain may not be able to write lines.

In addition, when considering the topic of bullying, social and societal factors must be taken

into account. Oftentimes zero-tolerance bullying policies are unfairly weighted against

minority students especially students who are LGBT+. Bullying and discipline related to

bullying must be able to address the root of the issue and not simply the acts of violence

themselves.

I also believe that the curriculum should be socially conscious or at least socially and

culturally aware. Making curricula which are ableist, sexist, or otherwise accidentally or

2
purposefully discriminatory is unacceptable. In the age of the internet, professional

development courses, and fellow minority colleagues, educators have no excuse to be

actively ignorant or unwilling to adapt to the modern world. It is our duty to be “PC” if being

“PC” makes our students feel more comfortable in our classrooms.

This is especially important in the music classroom. Certain instruments should not be

considered as inherently masculine and feminine, and neither should certain voice parts.

There are transgender students as well as countertenor, contraltos, boy sopranos, and more

which will exist in every school system. The names of choirs, vocal parts, and dress codes

should reflect this. For example, concert dress code should be gender neutral and allow for

the use of religious headwear. In addition, choirs can be named things such as “camerata

choir,” “trebles choir,” “TTBB choir,” “swing choir,” or “madrigal choir” versus things such

as “women’s chorus” or “men’s choir”.

The curriculum should also consider the fact that outside factors have an influence on

their students’ performance in the classroom. Teachers should take this into account when

teaching and writing curriculum instead of ignoring it. Teachers who ignore this send their

students the message that they do not care about them as people or about their lives outside of

school. Students learn best when not overly stressed about choosing between their personal

situation and their schoolwork. Oftentimes students in difficult situations in both home and

school fall into destructive cycles in which both aspects of their lives suffer. I believe that by

being understanding and compassionate, and seeing my kids as being worthy of respect and

autonomy, I can help to break these self-destructive cycles.

In addition, steps should be taken to enhance the cultural awareness of students in

music programs. “Nonwestern” music should not be a one-time class taught only at the

collegiate level; it should be fully integrated into the curriculum from Kindergarten through

Post-Bac. “Nonwestern” music history may be officially taught at the same time as

3
“Western” music history, but children can begin learning these styles of music as early as

Kindergarten. Lots of “nonwestern” music is taught aurally, which makes it excellent for

children to learn through rote, and teaching “nonwestern” music alongside “western” music

can give kids a head-start on learning things such as polyrhythms and alternate tunings.

While we adults see these things as complex, children are a blank slate. All music is new to

them. If taught alongside the more “traditional” curriculum, it can become just as natural as

“western” music is to us “classically” trained musicians.

Learning Environment

The learning environment of the classroom itself should be a safe space in which

students may express themselves creatively, make mistakes, participate actively, fail safely,

succeed, find their strengths and weaknesses, be their bests selves, and above all: learn.

I am a firm supporter of participatory culture in the classroom facilitated by active

discussions, technology, Orff techniques, and Kodaly hand signs/sign language. Using

technology, sign language (esp. A-G + major/minor), and Kodaly hand signs (Do-Ti) in the

classroom can help increase participation among students who are less outgoing, nonverbal,

or otherwise reluctant to talk. Music is often seen as a “universal language” and at the very

least should be something that can be shared with everyone. For example, students who are

HoH or deaf may be able to connect with percussion instruments or other instruments which

they can feel, or students who are nonverbal may be able to give better answers by using

anonymous clicker questions, KahootTM, or the option to sign words or notes instead of

speaking them. I believe that active discussion is an important part of the learning

environment and allowing students to discuss things in their own ways helps us to discover

4
viewpoints may otherwise not be shared. All aspects1 of classes should have visual, aural, and

tactile components to connect with the different learning styles of each student.

In addition, the use of technology can increase participation by allowing us as

musicians to tap into the digital realm. Students may interact with music digitally using

Spotify©, Soundcloud©, Tiktok©, and other sites and apps. Curriculum should reflect the

digital age and should allow students freedom to choose to interact with music in this way.

The use of technology also allows teachers to have more ways to assess students other than

through traditional pen-and-paper test taking or playing/singing tests. This allows otherwise

smart students who have issues with pen-and-paper tests to still be able to show that they are

learning, and in addition teaches students real-world skills such as remixing or DJ’ing that

they can use in the music industry. In addition, the creation of transformative works is a good

exercise in creativity and allows students to connect with curriculum in a way that is more

personal and meaningful.

From another standpoint, teaching things such as music coding through languages

such as Supercollider and MSP and learning how to build musical machines through

inventions such MakeyMakey and RaspberryPi allows musicians to further bridge the gap

between the Arts and STEM and helps us find even more ways to connect with different

types of kids.

Finally, while learning, students should be allowed to make mistakes and fail.

Mistakes and failures happen, and it is our duty to let them happen in a safe and productive

manner. Humans learn through trial and error, and kids have everything to learn. We need to

let our kids make mistakes and yes, sometimes fail, but we need to show them that failure is

not the end and that it can be an avenue for learning. I believe that tests should be able to be

1
As many aspects as possible

5
retaken, projects should be able to be redone, and mistakes should be able to be corrected.

We need to show students failures should be learned from instead of dwelt upon. In addition,

many students come from homes in which failures are handled in an unhealthy manner. We

need to model how to deal with failure. We need to help students not be upset by failed

grades and angry parents, but instead teach them to learn from those failures, retake the test,

and grow. Class should not be about the letter on the report card. Class should be about

personal growth. We as teachers should allow our students to get creative, take risks, fail

productively, and learn enthusiastically.

In conclusion, it is our duty as teachers to provide a modern learning environment

which supports multiple learning styles, encourages participation, and is socially conscious.

We as teachers should make a learning environment in which everyone is comfortable

through the use of non-offensive terminologies, assistive technologies, socially conscious

bullying policies, multiple teaching styles and punishments, and a willingness to learn from

students.

6
Works Cited

Beinborn, J., Faulkner, A., Keeble, S., Rockwell, J., & Wright, R. (n.d.). Introduction to Orff:

Presented by the Heart of Illinois Orff Chapter. IMEC 2019.

Dziuk, S. (2018). We Are What We Wear Inclusion and Diversity in Concert Attire.

Teaching Music, 26-28.

Erwin, J. H., Edwards, K., Kerchner, J., & Knight, J. (2003). Prelude to music education.

Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Nix, M. (n.d.). Working Towards Inclusivity: Gender, Music Education, and the LGBTQ

Experience. IMEC 2019.

Tobias, Evan S. (2013) Toward Convergence: Adapting Music Education to Contemporary

Society and Participatory Culture. Music Educators Journal, 99(4), 29-36.

You might also like