Tep Nutrition Group - Claims On Food Packages

Nutrition Claims on Food Packages
-All of the other things we see- colors, images, words, are ways of capturing our attention and making the product look
enticing to consumers.
-Ask questions:
Q: What is confusing to you about food marketing?
Q: What are some examples of nutrition claims you see or hear about regarding certain foods?
Q: Why are products marketed with these claims?
Q: What do companies hope to get from us as consumers?
-Today we’re going to run through some of examples of these health claims, some of which are regulated by the FDA,
some are not.
-FDA is the regulating food agency, with a goal of being truthful but not misleading.
- Show pictures of what packaged food products would look like without advertisements
• “Good source fiber” vs. “great source”

o Yes, these claims are regulated
o good source= product must contain 10% of the DV or 2.5 g fiber per serving.
o Great source or high fiber= 20% DV fiber or 5g per serving. In Europe, these claims are slightly different.
• “Whole grain” or “whole wheat”

o Yes, these claims are regulated
o 10g whole grain per serving or ½ oz of whole grains/ brown rice per serving.
o Can also use claims relating whole grains with reduced risk of coronary heart disease and certain
cancers on products label (ie. cheerios)
o “Cereal grains that consist of the intact, ground, cracked, or flaked caryopsis, whose principal anatomical
components – the starchy endosperm, germ and bran – are present in the same relative proportions as
they exist in the intact caryopsis”
o Whole grain= examples are: amaranth, barley, buckwheat, bulgar, corn (including popcorn), millet,
quinoa, rice, rye, oats, sorghum, teff, triticale, wheat and wild rice
o Whole wheat is not soybeans, chickpeas, oilseeds and roots, corn flour or corn meal, pearled barley.
• “Superfood”
o No, this claim is not regulated, anybody can use it
o Food with supposed health benefits as a result of some part of its nutritional analysis or its overall
nutrient density
o Not commonly used by experts (dietitians or nutrition scientists)
• “Anti-inflammatory”
o not regulated
• “All-natural”
o Not regulated
o no definition of the term, so you can label anything you want with “natural.”
o Current products labeled as natural include frozen chicken nuggets, cereals, artificial sweeteners
• “reduced fat” or “Low-fat” or “Fat-free”
o Reduced fat= 25% less fat than the original version
o reduced refers to the amount of fat that has been removed from the original product. So “30% less fat”
would be a reduced fat food product.
o Low fat= contains ≤ to 3 g fat per serving and 30% less of the total calories per serving from fat.
o There can only be 3g fat per 100g of a main dish
o Fat free= 0.5 g fat or less per serving and must not have a fat-based ingredient like oil
**talk about the difference between a serving size and a portion size (sometimes the serving size is not
reflective of what a normal portion would be)**
**nutrition labels can be a percentage above or below what the label actually says**
• “Healthy” or “Healthful” and “Health Promoting”

o must meet five criteria, four of them are maximum allowed levels of fat, saturated fat, sodium and
cholesterol. The fifth criteria require that a serving of the food has at least 10% of the DV of one or more
desirable nutrients (vit A, vit C, calcium, iron, dietary fiber and protein).
o The workaround is that replacement words can be used that are not regulated including “wholesome”
and “nutritious”.
• “Premium”
o when referring to meat it doesn’t mean anything, it is not regulated
o The FDA does have grades of meat that include terms like prime, choice, select, standard and good.
• “Enriched”
o Replaces nutrients lost during food processing
o White bread and white rice require enrichment in the United States
• “Fortified”
o Adding micronutrients to food (vitamins or trace elements)
o Examples are milk fortified with vitamin D, orange juice fortified with calcium, grain products fortified
with folic acid
• “Gluten Free”
o Can also be labeled “no gluten” or “free of gluten”
o <20 ppm of gluten which is the lowest that can be reliably detected using scientific analysis
o Labeling started in 2013
Q: As a consumer, how do these advertisements affect you?
Q: How do you respond to these labels that are put on foods? How can you re-frame these labels?
Q: How can you prepare for grocery shopping trips?
• Take a supportive friend or family member

• Use Instacart
• Make a list beforehand
• Find a store with a smaller selection
• Choose foods based on authentic taste preference
• Choose foods based on price per ounce, not brand name
Q: What contributes to this type of food labeling?

• Diet culture
• Individual beliefs about food

Tep Nutrition Group - Claims On Food Packages

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Tep Nutrition Group - Claims On Food Packages

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Tep Nutrition Group - Claims On Food Packages

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Nutrition Claims on Food Packages

Q: What is confusing to you about food marketing?

Q: Why are products marketed with these claims?

Q: What do companies hope to get from us as consumers?

• “Good source fiber” vs. “great source”

• “Whole grain” or “whole wheat”

• “Healthy” or “Healthful” and “Health Promoting”

Q: As a consumer, how do these advertisements affect you?

Q: How can you prepare for grocery shopping trips?

• Take a supportive friend or family member

Q: What contributes to this type of food labeling?

You might also like