The Art of Guillotining Procreators: An Anti-Natalist Manifesto

By Theophile de Giraud
"Pregnant women will one day be stoned, instinct
Maternal proscribed, the sterility demanded. "
Cioran, The Bad Demiurge.

"Try to persuade people to refrain from procreating

Name of morality - great gods! What an outcry! "
Leon Tolstoy, The Sonata in Kreutzer.

"Millions of men die of hunger, injustice,

Obscurantism are everywhere; We arrest, we imprison, we
Deporting, torturing, spreading blood, spreading lies
Corrupter, illiteracy is maintained, ideas are stifled
Generous, the consciences are annihilated - during this time,
Our literary celebrities make literature comfortable,
That is to say, pure manure, prostituting itself to the public
The ways and means, in particular through this
Of decerebration that is our present television. Between people
Good company, we embroider on worn-out ideas - but
What matters today is hunger in the world, the
Non-culturization of the masses, the pollution of nature by
Chemical abuse, uncontrolled demography, threats of
The nuclear arsenal. The rest, madame, we do not care! "
Louis Calaferte, Law of the City.
Now is the time to bend the accusation against the real craftsmen of
All the misfortunes that hurt our miserable humanity day after day: the
Parents!

The philosophy has debated all the questions that have to be

Human, except for one: the ethical validity of the Procreation. No
To describe the merits, or to demonstrate the
criminal. Taboo Supreme! Absolute Scotomization. As if procreation
Was our ultimate idol, our caudal illusion, the armored sanctuary where the
Questioning seems to have no right to exercise! And yet, behind
This strange sacrality of fecundity, that of perversions the attentive observer
Could not he discover ...

This book will therefore have the ambition of filling a gap in history
Of the thought by proposing to the reader an anti-natalist argument which,
Of complete exhaustiveness, will at least draw the lines of
Force on which any future debate concerning the law or
Not to impose life on an uncreated person, who would not
Knew beforehand all the inexpugnable difficulties.
If no monograph had yet ventured to disassemble parts by
The unhealthy sophisticated edifice where the acclamators of
The birth, how many authors, on the other hand, at all times, on all
The continents, redoubled their prolixity in order to lose themselves in lamentations
Polymorphs on our painful condition! There is no longer any
Literature or philosophy, the vigorously pessimistic clamor and the
Stinging protests against being brought into the world.

Some quotations from the best minds are enough to convince:

Such is the fate which the gods have wrought for the unfortunate mortals:
Live in pain.
Homer, Iliad. Greece, 8th Century. AD

Better a hundred times not be born;

But if we must see the light,
The least harm is still to return
Where you come from, and the sooner the better!
 Sophocles, Oedipus at Colonus. Greece, Fifth Century. AD

Human life is nothing but suffering, and there is no truce in its

sentences.
Euripides, Hippolytus. Greece, Fifth Century. AD

The life of a man is accompanied as soon as the birth of worries of any

Species. Life is nothing but dust and filth.
Tchouang-Tseu, Work. China, IVth Century. AD

For who really knows the world, everything is suffering.

Patanjali, Yoga-Sutra. India, 2nd Century. AD

There is nothing so misleading, as perfidious as human life;

Nobody, great gods! Would not, if we did not receive it
Without our knowledge. If, then, the supreme felicity is not to be born, that which
Approach is, I imagine, disappearing as soon as possible and
Return quickly to the original nothingness.
Seneca, Consolation in Marcia. Rome, 1st century.

The living being is, when he is alive, immersed and immersed in the
pain ; And the situation in which there is no suffering is
More salutary than the situation in which they exist. Death is
Therefore more salutary to man than life.
Razi (Rhazes), The Spiritual Medicine. Arabia, Xe century.

Staying in the earthly prison causes me, alas, an infinity of

Evils! To live with me is so painful and so long that I invoke death.
François Pétrarque, Canzoniere. Italy, XIVth century.

Ha! Death, common port, men's comfort,

Come bury my sorrows, I pray you with hands joined!
Happy who never was.
Pierre of Ronsard, Sonnets. France, XVIth century.

Well-being is in heaven; But we are on earth,

Where all is but annoyance, worry, and grief.
William Shakespeare, Richard II. England, XVIth century.
I do not know by what adventure my mother gave me the day,
In this, however, Nature did play a nasty trick.
Francisco de Quevedo, Malchance. Spain, Seventeenth century.

Men must weep at their birth, and not at their death.

Montesquieu, Persian Letters. France, 18th century

Life is a burden to me, I desire death and I abhor existence.

Oh ! That I am never born!
J. W. von Goethe, Faust. Germany, 19th century

A certain detestable evening I had the misfortune to be born.

Lermontov, A Hero of our Time. Russia, Nineteenth century.

After the misfortune of being born, I know no greater than

That of giving birth to a man.
Chateaubriand, Memoires d'Outre-Tombe. France, 19th century.

Life is an evil.
Auguste Strindberg, Coram Populo. Sweden, 19th century

Peace is obtained in death. You have to die to get into the Peace.
Natsume Sôseki, I'm a Cat. Japan, 20th Century

The dream, the only dream is not to be born.

André Breton, The Immaculate Conception. France, 20th century

Needless to insist, we could multiply these guilty grievances

By tens of thousands. For a slightly more extensive sample, we suggest
The reader to go through Appendix I: he will discover how much the psyche
Collective is indignant to have been born only to swim incommensurably
More often under an ice pack of dissatisfaction than in a lagoon of
Completeness.

We see, the pleasure of living, litote, seems far from unanimous ...
What an illusion, then, to think that our parents give us
For our own good! They are only concerned about the enjoyment
Draw from our presence. In truth, we exist only to fill with ease
Those profiteers who have the unthinkable hypocrisy of pretending to be our
Benefactors, and push the inhuman base to claim gratitude from us,
Obedience and filial piety, not to mention the various presents supposed to decorate the
Incomprehensible Mother's and Father's Day!

One of the most adamantine spiritual monarchs of humanity, the Buddha,

We had nevertheless severely warned by proclaiming his famous "Sarvam
Duhkham: Everything is Suffering ", not only birth, sickness,
Old age and death, of course, but even happiness since
We will inevitably lose it and mourn the loss …

Answer without evasion: if there was a solution capable of abolishing the

Of all the evils which our disastrous humanity groaned, if it were possible,
A remedy simple, immensely inexpensive, immediately
Accessible, scrupulously inoffensive, of an absolute and definitive efficiency,

To put an end to all distress, tears, cry of pain,

Any pathology, any protest of ill-being, any despair, any
Cataclysm, to any anguish, to any misfortune, in short to any torture distressing
The human species, would you have the macabre unintelligence to disdain such a
Remedy, to despise such a miraculous panacea? No, that goes without saying.
Well, this solution exists, and the arcane is here: it consists of everything
In his holy, ovoid and Colombian simplicity, to stop
procreate …

Stop now to reproduce yourself like any tribe

Of arboricultural primates and in less than a century, all human suffering
Will have disappeared from the face of the earth!

Alas, a grimace twists your proboscide: you would like to keep

Existence, but without having to pay the tariff of its disadvantages. To our
Regret, we must announce that this is clashing in the
The incompatible: to live is, of all necessity, to suffer, since all happiness
Is bought only at the price of a hundred unpleasant efforts …

What! A palpitated solution that would cure all the afflictions

Of which humans complain incessantly and you hesitate to take it?
Such an inadmissibility identifies you as a sado-masochist: no
Only you indulge in that vain suffering we call
Existence, not only do you endorse, as the worst collaborators,
The presence of such suffering, but in addition, oh
Have the pretension to impose it on others, who do not claim it!
You want to exist, do you reproduce, but do you really deserve it?
Is it the nobility of soul that moves you or only the most egoism
Bituminous?

Needless to pretend: the child is a gift that parents make to themselves.

We will come back.
 Posture i
The Three Sorrows

A race of men was tested on the Earth

Who knew the future better than the past,
But they died after a year
Of the suffering caused by this knowledge.
- Samuel Butler, Erewhon. England, 19th century

For the legacy of existence to be confined to the celebrable, it would

Or something other than a parcel bomb, overflowing a priori from all disarray
Possible.

Now, Three Sorrows permeate apodictically, without any other escape

Illusory, the backbone of our earthly journey: the Pain of
Pain of Living and the Pain of Dying. Let us briefly review them,
Keeping in mind that only one of them should logically
The perpetual prison, if not the guillotine, to those who afflict their
Like unfortunates.

a. Pain of the Born

Inter faeces and urinam nascimur:

We are born between excrements and urine.

Apophthegma patristic.

Supreme symbol, we are all born in defilement and suffering, Suffering of our genitress, no
doubt, who can not complain of it because she Has chosen it, but above all in that inescapable,
that we, the victims, the Unhappy exiles of the Nothingness, experience when driven out of a
paradise Pelagic obscurity in which no contradiction had ever occurred to us, we We find
suddenly struggling, monstrously compressed, to the limit Poisoning, asphyxia and syncope,
with a very bad obstetric canal Designed by this incompetent handyman whom we call Mother
Nature.

Let us not downplay this dramatic episode of the coming-in-the-world: anyone Took the trouble
to read Otto Rank or Sandor Ferenczi knows that the birth Constitutes a real cataclysm, a major
trauma whose existence Is not enough to cure us. Brusque confrontation with a hostile world,
Radically different from anything we had known before,
Well: birth is our first wound.

In reality life always ends in a catastrophic way,

Even that it began with a disaster, birth.
- Sandor Ferenczi, Thalassa. Hungary, 20th century.

The primitive voluptuous state was interrupted, in a way

Undesirable, by the act of birth and the purpose of all life
To replace this lost paradise.

The feeling of primitive anguish that accompanies birth [...]

Manifests itself throughout life, until death.

[The birth is] a painful situation to excess.

- Otto Rank, The Trauma of Birth. Austria, 20th Century

Life can hardly start worse than by birth.

Would nature at once want to displease us and annoy us
Herself, that she would hardly have made the coming into the world more painful. A
Little more painful, it would have been to take the risk of giving up only
Corpses or cripples: more than one baby of the rest holds nowadays
Still the exquisite privilege of dying stifled or dislocated by the vagina of
A bad soul that gives birth, even though most newborn babies
To survive the process, but not without
Their corporeal state, of a deteriorated one who touches the repugnant, testifies to the
The unthinkable violence of the episode of genesis.

Plutarch had already foreseen that the coming-in-the-world was nothing of a moment
of relaxation. Let us listen to him in his treatise,
The Love of Fathers and Mothers for their Children:

"It is true that" Of all the animals that creep upon the earth,
In the air, man is the least happy. "[Homer's famous quotation,
In The Iliad. NdA]. But this truth is especially evident in the child who comes
To be born. Nothing is so feeble, so indigent, so devoid of everything, so dirty and so shapeless,
that The child who comes out of his mother's womb. Of all animate beings, he is the only one to
whom the Nature has not granted pure entry into life. He enters it with blood and
Less like a living being than a man who would come from massacre. "

Massacre: it is significant that the term reappears identically, tenneuf

Centuries later, in one of our most essential contemporary authors
(A thousand leagues away from disposable writers overflowing the media): Frédérick
Leboyer, an authentic obstetrical specialist, and a real practitioner
Experienced, who had the rare courage to describe the fall-in-the-world in any
His terrible brutality. Let us savor here his denunciation, of which it is useless
To point out that it raised a pretty scandal among the "visually impaired" people:

That, a birth? It is an assassination! And before such a

Suffering, these ecstatic parents! But it is not credible!
Birth is suffering. And not just childbirth.
Coming to the world is as painful as it was, there is not so much
For a long time, to be born. When he said "the birth is
Suffering ", the Buddha spoke not of the mother but of the child.
To be born, what a calamity!
Worse still is the burning of air in the lungs. […] This
Burn, yes, exceeds in horror all the others. In the child,
Everything rears, everything closes, spits out, everything seeks to repel
the enemy. And that's the cry! This first howl is a no! It's the
The shock of a being whom one assassinates, that one violates, it is an outraged refusal,
Passionate, against what, precisely, is life!
All the vertigo, all the anxieties bear the same signature: the
birth. [...] With all his strength the child struggles against. [...] The child Is no more than a block
of terror. [...] Lost in this hostile universe,
Incomprehensible, insane, he never ceases to suffocate with fear.
[...] He rejects his birth and the world.
Yes, here is the birth, the massacre of an innocent man, this torture,
Calvary.
Frédérick Leboyer, For a Birth without Violence. France, 20th century

Bigre: massacre, rape, assassination, calvary, terror, calamity, burning, torment!

What conclusion can be drawn from this, except that between a woman who
Have heard these kill echoes) and a hangman, there is no
The slightest difference, except that, strangely, the parturient is never
Dragged before the magistrates …
To see a recent child, his crumpled body (cyanosé, edematié, asphyxic
As the medical literature confesses ...), to contemplate his plowed face of
Shrieks, his look lacerated with anguish, his cheeks scratched with tears, who would doubt
That he had just been subjected to the equivalent of beatings by a
Horde of pithecanthropus? What sadism in parents to inflict
Full knowledge of the circumstances, such abuses, such
" Darling " !

To the hypocritical and idle souls who would allow themselves to tie a pout
Skeptical about the genuine torture inflicted on the child at birth,
The following:

The specialized works, without daring the heroic-speaking truth of a Leboyer,

The state of shock in which the newborn
Can only, in desperation, advise the Caesarean when
Fetal distress becomes extreme (include: when the agony that the baby
Crosses the shoot more and more towards the decease pure and simple); of the
The most serious, some have ventured to bring the sudden
Of the fetus from a protective aqueous medium to a hostile air environment
With what an astronaut stripped suddenly of his combination
Space! ; Finally, while such a dictionary of medicine compares
Hesitation the birth to a screw (sic) having to make a passage through the
The osteous basin of the parturient, other texts, one can not more official,
Jaundice is particularly prevalent in the survivor, and Bruises and hematomas due to extraction
and manipulation
Various types of injury, which are easy to understand since it seems
Nature has thought more of coitus by fashioning a vagina than by putting it into a mud-basin
Of a new being.
What! The little one would suffer little when coming into the world? He needs
Often tearing the sex of his genitrix to extirpate him and his skull still
Malleable, surrounded by a gigantic vise, would not be sacked with pain?
Worse: the obstetrician sometimes has to urgently use the forceps or extractor
To pull the "screw" to the sucker where it agonizes! What to say
The need for the resuscitation of these wretches on
Of the crusher! Would it not be ignored that some of them emerge only dead and head
Duly crushed to the cephalotribe? As for all those who escape
Vagina martyris auteur, they scream like gorets gorged, and one would come
To doubt that the episode of the coming-in-the-world is akin to the worst torments
Endurable!
Well no ! Not a midwife, ask them, who only recognizes
Birth is one of the most horrible things that can happen to a human being!
One would like, to eviscerate the ostriches euphemistic the atrocity of
Cite all the specialists of the gesine.
If not, let us delight in the confessions of a successful pediatrician
Suspect of "dramatizing the drama". One can not, by reading these lines of the famous
Doctor Spock, roaring with hilarity or going to the
Close to exterminate those who suffer
To a newborn:

The appearance of a baby at birth usually disappoints parents

Who have never seen it. [...] Her face is puffy and bumpy, and
Sometimes keeps the bluish marks of forceps or suckers.
Her head, distorted by the "molding" of childbirth, is
Asymmetrical: flat forehead, elongated skull, irregular lines. Of
In addition, some babies have a serum-blood lump, or
Subcutaneous haemorrhage, located on the head and
Weeks to disappear. Two or three days after birth,
The baby can make a small jaundice that lasts about one
week.
- Benjamin Spock, How to heal
And educate your child. United States, 20th
Century.

Clearly, a woman can not be blamed

Has just given birth, no more than castrate enough the barbarian who
Fertilized! By their conscious and deliberate couple, a helpless baby comes
To suffer the equivalent of a killing whose terrible memory will haunt
All the rest of his existence! How does Justice not sanction
An act of such sordid cruelty? How does it not at least
The father, the inseminator, the most superfluous of men, who became an accomplice
Of such infamy (what do I say: such a slaughter), if only for
"Non-assistance to very young person in danger"?
The abortions ignore their chance, for it is to reflection no creature
Which has not been the object of astounding violence on the part of its breeders. from
Our birth, here are our parents heavily indebted to us; Only one
Right to do so: to make every effort to compensate us
To have had to come into the world!

At the very moment when her mother extracted her out of her womb, she
Torturer of his own child! Knowing that there are no
Police than the ones used in the "genital
Baby who, in his more than defending body, goes through it, one would understand better
That the young lady and her lamentable fecundor receive a reprimand,
A postilion of disdain, the medal of ferocity, or even a severe fine
For "ill-treatment of a person for whom they were responsible"
And of which it was up to them to refrain from conceiving it, instead
The Pharisees congratulations and the bouquet of tulips
Protocolary incensing the sinister "heroes" of the day!

A child was horribly mistreated, a toddler has just suffered

Like a slug passed under the tire of a bicycle, a frail one
Marmouset comes to know one of the most terrible disasters of its
Existence, and here is the whole assembly occupied with rejoicing with the assent
Of judicial authorities: unfortunate baby, in what world have you come from
Make your painful entrance! As you can already see, here
Victims are always wrong and evildoers flourish
public.

All these premeditated carnations give birth

At least of a sheer truth:
From the outset,
Living is tantamount to suffering ...

b. Pain Relief

After suffering, you must suffer still.

Alfred de Musset, The Night of August. France, 19th century
Century.

Let us pass over the innumerable subsequent wounds, nameless anxieties,

Anger without remedy, which will inflict on us the necessary adaptive effort to
Our very unfriendly environment during our childhood: we do not
Not the physical pain (blows, diseases ...) nor the reasons for crying
Or psychic disorders more or less pronounced in juveniles,
Statistics.

And for many of us, even this privilege as a child soldier, or

That a child-prostitute, or a child-slave of the Third World envies us:
school. For many of us, the school was hardly less unpleasant than
jail ; Still the convicts, these perpetual vacationers, are
Less exempt from blockades and docimological estrapades ...
Invariably, throughout our youth, growing up is tantamount to suffering.

Every childhood is less a golden age than an interminable odyssey of bloody

Sobs and nauseating submission to the socio-parental requirements.
We would be wrong, once we reached adulthood, to believe us
Immune to the bad jokes of fate. The adultery
Unemployment, or worse: the stress of
Professional life, the hassle of family or sentimental life, worries
Financial difficulties, exasperating domestic chores, constraints
Disgust, lassitude, pathologies, disappointments and
Polymorphic tests to which no man ever escapes, whatever
His destiny, of glory or decadence.

Thus, to live one's adult life is to suffer again ...

Then, here is old age and its infinite procession of boredom, evils,
Of remorse, of monotony, of regret, of illness
(Definitely intuitive, what health these diseases!), Weaknesses, discomforts,
Of impotence, of more or less solitary grief, of bodily pain
(Still ...), mourning and especially anguish in the face of the octopus of death
Petrifying tentacles approach at very fast pace.
Alas, old age is always suffering …

This is the synopsis of all existence.

But perhaps these are only opinions, only points of view (for
Life also has its "good moments": it is besides the least
One can ask him, will criticize the captains of the long course, account
Considering the exorbitant price to which these fugitive "good times" are bought!),

But Beyond our subjective perceptions of life, which are revealed to us by the
- and these realities will not admit the dispute - that the
Structures, the mechanisms that determine our survival and
Distribution of joys and sorrows?
Do we know enough that it is possible to demonstrate that life
Of evils than property? That it is comfortable to establish that the conditions
A priori of appearance of the evil are more flexible than the conditions of appearance
Of good and that the wheels that govern existence have enough squeaking
To attest to the superiority of pessimism over natalist doctrines?
Let's see.

The Bionomic Decalogue,

Or the 10 Laws of Existence.

This brief argument will suffice to highlight the terrible asymmetry

Ontological reigning between certain suffering and enjoyment only
Possible!

1. We are born of Needs

Whose non-satisfaction engenders pain.
Food, shelter, adequate sleep, protection from
Innumerable enemies and predators, stay in a state of health
Decent, find a satisfying sexual partner (difficult this, very difficult):
So many heavy constraints on which we constantly flay ourselves.
Anyone who, alas, for the sake of tranquility, tries to evade these tedious
Native obligations falls right in the face of suffering …

2. To meet our needs,

Constant necessity of the Effort and the Struggle.
Now all Effort, in essence, is disagreeable since it is the antithesis of the
Rest, the Nonchaloir, the Idleness that we so much courtez.
Life without struggle, there is no struggle without displeasure. If we do not try to appease
Our needs, we suffer; If we fight to soften them, we
Still suffer. "No bread, no gain," so justly threatens the Anglo-Saxon proverb ...
Whoever is born therefore falls into the certainty of annoyance,
The ocean of difficulties to overcome, with no other hope than to be defeated by the ultimate
Difficulty: dying …

3. Misery abounds,
Happiness tends to escape.
It is incomparably easier to be unhappy, on this planet
Of incessant struggles, than to find happiness there. Doing nothing is enough for us
Suffering, while on the other hand, stubborn efforts are
Not always to guarantee us bliss! This law alone ruins, and
Definitively, any optimistic claim.

4. Pain is experiencing
More intensely than voluptuousness.
Compare orgasm with a rage of teeth or even with a simple
Indigestion or with a trivial cancer. Let us pass over the rapes,
Crashes, serious accidents and other extreme tortures always
Possible ...

5. The Temporality of Happiness is shorter

Than the Temporality of Woe.
Subjective time flows faster in jouissance than in suffering.
Nothing slows a clock better than the index fired by the flame of a lighter.
From a psychological point of view, therefore, the life of the happy man is always
Already shorter than that of the unhappy man: what more dismaying?

6. Pleasure only takes time

Voluptuous stimulation;
The pain lasts much longer
Than the event that causes it.
Well-being dissipates a few minutes after orgasm or feast (the
Hassles so quickly pick up ...) but a car or work accident,
If not a holiday, you sometimes torture your life ...
7. Health does not provide in itself
No positive enjoyment; The disease causes
On the contrary, a very perceptible disagreement.
Compare a healthy bone or stomach with a fractured bone or
Stomach covered with ulcers!

8. The essence of desire is dissatisfaction

And its realization has no other flavor
Than the Deception.
To desire is to suffer from a want; However, as soon as this gap is
While each object of conquered desire turns out to be inferior
To what we hoped for: nothing fills us permanently. Watch out for
Newlyweds six months after their wedding ...

9. Prolonged happiness leads

On to new sufferings:
Boredom and Anxiety to Lose
This hardly conquered bliss.
If, by a miracle, at the end of a legion of architectonic efforts, sometimes
We feel happy, it is enough that nothing happens within this
Happiness so that the torments of Lassitude come insidiously
To annihilate our illusion of well-being: disgust triumphs as well from love
That of a stay too prolonged on a islet considered paradisiacal ...
And even if, at the price of a thousand entertaining tricks, we would succeed
To keep us a time on the summits of fullness, the least
Interstice left free in our mental space will confront us with the sinister and
Agonizing certainty of having one day to fall from these eudemonic privileges. In the end, no
one can proclaim himself happy when he remembers that
The future, heavy with the lacerating laws of life, stands before him!

10. Anguish is the skeleton of all destiny.

Even if we could (but how could we
Since it was our first experience, the imprint, the model of all
The following?) To free ourselves from the archetypal anxiety inherited from our
Birth, how, keeping in mind the ever-increasing
Experiences and difficulties that have plagued our past.
To fear their resurgence, according to a modality perhaps even more atrocious,
In a more or less proximate future?
How to deal with all the potential aggressions that surround us
Not be afraid at any time that one of them reaches us and
What?

How can we finally silence the anguish associated with our most intimate project, the
Less uncertain: to suffer the death?

To exist is nothing but to wander into a forest of fears where the

Question is never whether Evil will reach us, but only
When and in what form it will make us its terrified prey. For our lives
Subconscious, all future is terror (as all past is error): that we
Survive the trials of fate or that we have to face that of death,
Every next day has the tint of anxiety for us and we do not begin
Never a day, if we question the confidential whirlwinds of our
Soul, without fearing what it reserves to us ... To live, it is certainly to suffer but
It is also constantly overcoming the anguish of suffering!
Conclusion:
 Suffering is consubstantial with Existence,
And the anguish of suffering the very texture
Of our Humanity!

These are the Ten Basic Laws that structure our

Experience of life: they curl, admit it, the sinister and obliterate
Any way exaggerated enthusiasm about the "happiness" of existing. Mostly,
They can only radically disqualify any vitalist impetus: how
Deny that the worst is always more within reach than the best? Depressing Irremediable and
inculpatory ontological asymmetry, we are always
Already more certain to moan than to enjoy ...

c. Dying Pain

Vulnerant omnes ultima necat.

All wound us and the last one kills us.
Epigraphs of the clocks of time in the past.

At last, standing before us like a wall of bloody fangs,

The moment of death; We will have to go through tortures
Physical and psychic agony (αγων α: struggle, anxiety) for
The right to leave this unfortunate existence in which
We had hardly asked to make our entry …

Not content with having inflicted on us the sorrow to come into the world, our
Parents, as genuine assassins, have the delicacy to inflict on us the
to leave.

And yet, given the pain of existing, we would often be tempted to

We exclaim: "Finally death! If she did not move forward with a
New distress batch. Alas, every death is terrible, if it were not so,
We would gladly put an end to our days, even before we could have
We reproduce …

We must, throughout our lives, bear the instinctive fear of

Lose, which is yet inevitable. What man
He feared the most, he must, of all necessity, undergo it!
To give birth to a being does not only force him to struggle
To ensure a (barely) tolerable destiny, it also obliges him to listen without
Remission the funereal background noise that whispers to him, hour after hour,
From the age of reason: "Thou also one day thou shalt die, and it shall be neither foolish nor
festive ! ".

In short, all his painful labors will only bring back to nothingness,
Of an odyssey of the most trying, a creature deconflicts, unspeakably
Disgusted to know always already promised to that even inexistence to which
Her cruel breeders have imbeciled her …

Whether swift or dragging, the death is full of inconveniences

(Fears, spasms, alarms, convulsions, it is said of agony ...): it does not
Inspires not an instinctive fear without reason; The body that dies is a
An organism that suffers, and suffers all the more because it struggles to survive.
Of the three main types of death: accident, sickness, old age,
Deserves our votes, which rejoices us? No. All of us are repugnant,
We are horrified.

The first day of your birth leads you to die as

to live.
Every day go to death, the last one arrives.
- Michel de Montaigne, Essays. France, XVIth century

Imagine a number of men in the chains, and all

Condemned to death, some of whom were each day slaughtered
View of others, those who remain see their own condition in
That of their fellow-men, and, looking at each other with
Pain and hope, await in their turn. It is the image of
Condition of men.
- Blaise Pascal, Thoughts. France, 17th century

Our manufacturers have indeed condemned us to death and we should

To show them filial piety? But my brave Confucius, my adorable
Moses, my syrupy Civil Code, you are joking! The assassins deserve
The jail, how is it that our father and mother escape it if not because
That most of us nurture the sadistic desire to generate at their
tower ? A crime committed by all is no less a crime. Who dances with joy
Before the ordeal of dying? No one. We tremble in unison. We
We suspect unanimously the inexpressible pain that existence
Inflict one last time before finally releasing us from its hold …
In the proper sense, death is ringing the hour when my parents kill me! I die
Because I had to be born, I agonize because my parents have given birth to me
And have, with full conscientiousness, premeditated, kneaded with malevolence
Theomimetic, shaped agonizable, fungible, biodegradable, marcescent,
Nightmarishly deadly! Without dithering, I declare my parents
Homicides and the incarcerated as such! I pass by their fault,
I leave this life by suffering in spite of me an ultimate torment, by them Only imposed, and
abjectly symmetrical to the inaugural, since finally one
Dies as one is born: in panic-stricken anxiety and uneasiness
Any description!

To live is to die, and to die,

As much as to be born is to suffer ...
Just unbutton his eyelids:
The birth is suffering,
Life is suffering,
Death is suffering,
And therefore procreation a cruelty
Of first magnitude
Deserving of so many slaps
That there are bacteria in an rectum.

Decidedly, the Three Sorrows, that our parents deliberately

Bequeath and impose, seem to assert life rather as a burden than
As jubilation …

Review of this algological introductory chapter. The existence having no

Only extorted far more complaints from men than from celebrations
Unconditional, but above all proved permeable to the demonstration, by the
By means of a simple phenomenological analysis, of its transcendental harmfulness,
It is therefore hard to see what basis of cocorico-vitalist
Desire for Descent!

To be able to read in full awareness the rules of the penitentiary which

Metaphorizes all terrestrial destiny, which would really want to
His entrance? Surely not a thoughtful and clearly informed
What awaits him!

Posture ii
 Arguments (flasks)
In favor of the Procreation

Marrying for the purpose of having children,

That our name may not perish,
Or to have supports in old age,
Or to leave incontestable heirs,
It is the height of stupidity.
- Theophrastus, The Marriage. Greece, IVth
Century. AD

Thus, full of errors which it believes are legitimate,

His tranquil virtue preserves all his crimes.
- Nicolas Boileau, Satire X. France, 17th century

Before analyzing, according to the ferrule of La Rochefoucauld, the macerating defects

Under the pretended virtues of maternity, let us first take the time
To exterminate one by one the main arguments put forward by the partisans
Of childbirth. It will be seen that not one is faced with the double requirement of Reason and
The Ethics, in short before what constitutes the essential of the philosophy ...

a. Love

You will first pretend to be born of "love". Because you cook

Love you, you man, and you woman, it seems to you happy to crown
This love of a being that would advance like the synthesis of yourselves and
As the materialization of the feelings supposed to unite you.

Very good. But above all, are you sure of the love that unites you? Because
The statistics show that a very large number of
Marriages (one out of two) or unions (much more),
Base of love, lethal illusion, end in a divorce or a breakup!
As for marriages that do not unravel, they often rot more
That they do not persist ... Nothing is more absurd than to give birth supposedly
Love to then witness the slow dislocation of your couple through hatred,
Or lassitude ... The child that resulted from your "love" also ephemeral
That uncertain, on the other hand, will have the lasting certainty of suffering,
Since he was born.

Countless children are likely to see their parents

Separated within ten years of birth. How to argue
A feeling that it is not known whether or not it will continue to
Creature in a world where, for their part, the faithful Difficulties?

Moreover, even though, by exception, love between two beings

Would persevere long enough for the pangs of divorce to spare
Its fruit: is it sincerely loving her child to propel her into a
World where misery abounds while happiness presents an unfortunate one
Propensity to be delayed, if not to escape?

To love, it seems to me, is to desire all the possible good for the object
Of his Love. Now life is more akin to an evil than to a good:
This was sufficiently proved. In the unlikely where your personal experience
Would not have sufficed to break your worrying blindness as to the tragic
To exist, reread scrupulously Euripides, Cicero, Lucretius, Seneca,
Marc-Aurelius, Petrarch, Donne, Quevedo, Gracian, Milton, Pascal, Swift,
Voltaire, Hume, Chamfort, Chateaubriand, Bonaventura, Foscolo, Byron,
Schopenhauer, Leopardi, Lenau, Buchner, Kierkegaard, Lermontov, Leconte
Of the Isle, Turgenev, Baudelaire, Dostoevsky, Twain, Bierce, Lautreamont,
Strindberg, Maupassant, Panizza, Kafka, Jean Rostand, Artaud, Ghelderode,
Hedayat, Sartre, Beckett, Pavese, Ionesco, Cioran, Caraco, Sternberg or
Jaccard, in the coat of arms of myriads others (for the extent will always escape
To evoke all the thinkers that life despaired of itself), as well as
The whole of Christian, Buddhist, Gnostic, Platonic literature
Or brahmanic, to quote only ... An elementary chrestomat
Pessimism would still cover thousands of pages!

If one truly loves one's child,

There is no other option,
In view of the sufferings of which life is full,
Than to abstain from giving it birth!

b. The tasty Adventure of Living

The catalog of human lamentations immediately destroys the second

Argument of the candidates for parenthood: "the enjoyment that there would be in existence"
And therefore the benevolence which there would be in making exist a non-existent.
What enjoyment? Have we not established above that the existence of
Contains structurally more evils than goods?
Thus, to those who would try the argument, a hypocrisy yet
Hallucinating, life as "wonderful adventure deserving to be lived,
It remains easy to argue that even if such was the case, even if existence and
Suffering were not perfect synonyms, even if living, by madness,
Impossible, would lead to the supreme enjoyment, the one that does not exist
Lose nothing by not being there, since, obviously, in order to experience such a
Loss, you must already be part of the beings!

What does not exist does not know what it loses, it even ignores all that it gains
- a real fortune! - not to be. What does not exist does not
Regret, no remorse, no worry, no injury, no dilemma between "being or
Not to be ": its divine non-existence puts it at the shelter of all disappointment,
All want, every need, every temptation, sometimes to live, sometimes to
Die.

That to exist can charm the genomes of moles, we do not doubt,

But that the blind do not rely on the pretext, to offer their
Naveling the child they dream of, the privilege that there would be
That the non-existent remain perfectly sheltered from such a preoccupation!
Not your Pharisees, your children, you will not deprive them of anything
Nothing by letting them vegetate into nothingness, and this for an excellent reason:
It is because nothingness can not lack anything, can not complain of anything, or
Wear mourning for anything!

So devil your viscous "generosity": life is a gift

Poisoned, the non-tasting of which does not in any way affect the inetants.
Once and for all, not to be born is to escape all prejudices,
Including that of not being born, if birth could be something other than
Prejudice…

"But if life proves so detestable, will protest the captious, how is it

That most still choose to continue living rather than commit suicide
without delay ?
It is easy to exclude this objection if one remembers that man is
An animal which continues to obey much more its instinct than its reason. We
Live as we reproduce ourselves: by pure genetic conditioning.
Throughout the ages, there must have existed species very little inclined to act
Fertilization (see, to this day, the limiting case of
Pandas) than the bitter struggle for life. All of course, under the pressure of
Natural selection, have disappeared. Only the most fertile species
Terror of death proved sufficient to survive. The point is that the
Fear of death was one of the decisive genetic mutations in term
Of adaptive advantage. All primordial individuals lacking such a gene
Died before they even founded an embryo ...

Thus, although Reason has long taught the capable man

To think of the insoluble tragic of his destiny, our species, endowed as
All the others of the gene of the thanatophobia (or at least of the allegophobia,
Of the pain inherent in perishing), our species I said has still not taken
The party to die out. Does this prove that life is worth living or
Only the efficacy of such a gene, the despotism of the Instinct?
Needless to simulate: we all know that instinct dominates our
Psyche that the considerations of the highest spirituality have taken.
Anyone who denies such a well-established fact would have its place heated
Side of a literary character representative enough of average mankind:
I have named Tartuffe.

Living we dislike, but dying terrorizes us: we do not choose

Life, but not a less painful alternative. Grant to
The assurance that only nothingness awaits him beyond the grave and
Guarantee him a death without pain or anguish, you will multiply
The rate of suicide that humanity will soon enter
Sweet pantheon of extinct species …

As one of the reasons why we remain in the prison of

Life to which our moments of lucidity find so little charm,
Both the fear of divine punishment and the fear of being reborn,
Is born not a first time without fear that there may be a second!
Hell or reincarnation, a latent pessimism, inherited precisely from our
Experience of the real, our inextinguishable mistrust
Our determination to renew our stay among the evils we
We know rather than expose ourselves to others of whom we know nothing.
Hamlet Complex …

If we do not truciderons tonight, it is also in the hope

That tomorrow will compensate us for the penalties suffered yesterday. How many
We live only the way of the player each day a little more ruined and
Yet playing more and more in the hope of moping its losses,
to remake oneself " ? Utopia nevertheless: death will complete us completely
Before we have received one-tenth of the dividends that we
To pay this insolvent debtor who is the existence …

Anyone who engages in the dangerous game of life must admit that he
May accumulate losses on losses until the day on which the party
Totally lost.

To summarize, the reason for our hesitation in the face of extinction

Individual or collective group holds in this sad apophthegm: we live less by
Love of life only by terror of death; The trials of our destiny
Still seem preferable to the anxious pain that would
To escape from it.
Similarly, we do not reproduce ourselves by philosophy, or
Religious concern, or philanthropic benevolence, but only
By blind obedience to the Instinct. Aphids have only one
Weak argumentative consciousness: they multiply very well without recourse to
Hypocritical pretexts.

c. Prolonging humanity

Among these pretexts often invoked to justify that a miserable baby

To expose ourselves to our disarray, the idea of "perpetuating
The species ".

In order to counter this argument of such idealistic idealism,

Note that the human species did not exist a billion years ago
And no one complained about it ... Let us imagine now that our species
Disappears, and who will then remain to complain? The
The last of men? No, no, this one will also have disappeared; Then what voice
Human beings will groan on the evaporation of the most ferocious of all predators?
Who will regret that the branch of the primates, which has never ceased
To make war and kill each other ever since he (a little, oh so little)
Differentiated from other monkeys, suddenly ceased to exist? The animals that
We spend our time exploiting, abusing, torturing, imprisoning and
Genocider? Certainly not.
Moreover, according to all the current scientific evidence, the species
Human being is destined to extinction since the star that enlightens us
And warms us up has nothing eternal. Let us admit the scenario,
For the hour of pure fantasy, which would assume that man settled one day
Around another star, or even colonize the entire universe (for
That it has not been massacred by an alien civilization
Superior, superior in technique but equally malicious ...), how
Would this ubiquitous multiplication advance? How our destiny
Would be less absurd and ridiculous because we populate ten thousand lands
Instead of one? How is our metaphysical anguish diminished? In
What the hassles, the despair, the lassitude of the work alternating with the woods
Boredom, disappointed love, the fear of the morrow and all the others
Torments of the soul, less numerous?
Perpetuating the species, but for what purpose? Everything that is perpetuated in
Perpetuating the species, it is the opportunities to suffer and to complain
Individuals whose sum constitutes it! Species is only a concept; reality
These are legions of individuals who suffer …

After all, if the species wishes to perpetuate itself, let it manage without us.
The child does not have to become the instrument of our curiosity about the question
To know what the species will become; He has no more to take his place
Of a simple block in this wall of the lamentations that constitute the human kind
In order to fill those who fear its inevitable reduction in
Dust!

Big Chill or Big Crunch, absolute entropy or apocalyptic contraction

Of the universe: life has no future. Of necessity, evolution will cease and
Destruction will have the last word: why defer it?

Why to allow others to come and make this striking observation

Of failure? Scientifically, Death will be stronger than love, eternally
Superior to any ideal, to any project, to any edifice, to any civilization, to any
Biology; To pretend to the contrary is tantamount to feasting on the last toes of the
superstition.
In any case, the non-existent mocks whether the human race
Will or will not join, more or less early, the category, moreover enviable,
Of non-existence. The non-existent does not exist and does not complain
World…

"Ah, but sir, you must be aware that if humanity disappears we shall not
No more of Shakespeare, Tolstoy or Gandhi!
"Certainly, but we will not have either Hitler or Stalin or
Leopold II neither of Pol Pot nor of Pinochet or of Bush nor of exterminators
Native Americans or Australian Aborigines, or colonizers of Africa,
Nor of leaders of multinationals, nor especially of mephitic writers,
Always more numerous than the suaves.
Nine-tenths of humanity live without having read a traitorous
Shakespeare or Tolstoy, which considerably reduces the scope of your
And then, what would be your amazement if I told you that
The implicit work of most diamonds of thought was to make
Sufficiently aware of his miserable condition to
The party to gradually give up reproducing!

Listen to Shakespeare in Macbeth for example:

"Life is only a passing shadow, a poor actress

Who struts and torments during his hour of scene,
And then you can not hear. It's a fairy tale
Contested by an idiot, full of noise and fury,
Meaning nothing. "

Or in this edgy passage of his Henry IV:

"O God! That one can read the book of destiny,

And see the revolution of times,
[...] how random mock us,
And reversals fill the cup of change
Of various liquors! O, if it could be seen,
The happiest of young men,
Contemplating the course of his life,
What perils past, what troubles to come, -
Close the book, sit on it and die. "

You observe here some parenetic shaking in favor of the

Parturition? Not me.

You prefer Tolstoy in The Sonata in Kreutzer?

- What good is there?

- What's the point ? To live.
"But to live for what?" If no goal is pursued, if life
We have been given for itself, we have no reason to
live. If so, the Schopenhauers, the Hartmanns, and all the
Buddhists are perfectly right.
The human race must disappear? Does anyone
 No matter how he looks at the world, can doubt it? It is
As unmistakable as death. According to the doctrine of the Church,
The world will have an end, according to the teaching of science, this end
Is inevitable. What is it that is surprising that the teaching of
The same conclusions?
Children are a torment and nothing more.

Listen finally to Gandhi in All Men are Brothers:

I do not want to be born again.

Suffering is the law of men.

Or in his Letters to the Ashram:

A person whose activity is entirely devoted to the realization of

The Truth, which demands absolute disinterest, has no leisure to
Devoted to the selfish occupation of engendering children and directing
a house.

And conclude, rather fiercely:

The more their families are numerous and the more remote they are from love
Universal.

This is the speech of a great Soul.

If the genius is indeed the one who participates in the raising of the level of consciousness
Of mankind, there is no doubt that the sum of the genial thoughts
Will one day lead humanity to admit the primacy of
Being.

"To perpetuate the species" ... Of a grotesque! If our species

Resplendent with Virtues, if all his tragedies were not yet unfolded
On the background of Absurd …

Come, let the species disappear, who will be worse? Your

Hope? But whatever your hope, since it is bought at the price of blindness
Of which the leguminous plants, which are themselves so fertile, feel solidarity.
d. To leave something behind

Another argument often comes in the mouth of irresponsible

Which engender us. It is for them to "leave a trace". curious
Impulse.

Let us make the point immediately that from an ethological point of view,
Is similar to the attitude of many mammals
Abandoning a dejection on the ground to mark their presence or their
territory. The dog who urinates at the lamppost also leaves a trace; this
Unlike the baby, is entitled to the privilege of not having to
Endure the exhausting constraints of existence …

From a psychoanalytic angle, as we know, this desire to "leave a trace"

Is rooted in the behavior of the toddler who identifies his
Excrements to a gift and strives to make the very wise present at his
Mother.

Nothing very evolved or very mature in this desire to mark his

Temporal space while presenting to his contemporaries a "thing"
Fallen down a viscera ... There is definitely too much of this in this fantasy
Identity so that it can constitute a credible argument.
But trace for trace, if really it is important to leave one in order to
Not deny our instinct of mammals or betray our futile hope
Of immortality, it seems to me that a work of art, science, thought or
Philanthropy, is still a little better than a disaster
flesh. It is also useful and nobler to
others. For to leave a fleshly offspring, it is within reach
Of the first earthworm. Nothing is more amusing than to observe a
Cow calve, or a pig fertilizing his sow.

Thus, in reality, life is generated only by the inability to do better:

Engender spiritual …

" Leave a trace ". Very strange idea. There are so many mediocre beings,
And they want to leave a trace of their mediocrity! Save this
Gentlemen, we will do without your
memory. Unnoticed during your lifetime, you hope to be seen post-mortem?
You want to perpetuate your name? What is the point of your child imitating you and
Remains as anonymous as yourself?

Recognize the absurdity, even the burlesque, of this will of you

In order to "not fall into oblivion" since a few
Generations your great-grandchildren will not even know
Your name or the color of your hair, as to the luxuriance of your
Personality…

If you dread the ephemeral as well as the drama of our mortality (in
You have no qualms about registering the custodians
You get drunk ...), rather burn your anthroponym on an outcrop
Of granite: some petroglyphs happily cross the millennia. Or
Still have an elegant quatrain of your own carved on your tombstone,
The latter will still participate in the readable when your pitiful heirs
Have already been eaten by other worms.

e. The Religious Obligation: "God said that" (but also the

than)

Somewhat more seriously, others exhort the "metaphysical injunction"

To accredit their unhealthy caprice of descent. God would require us
That we perpetuate ourselves. What do you know about that? Would you be familiar with
Decrees of the divine? This God so little palpable, so little thirst-quenching,
That for all these decades we glossed while Questing in the most sincere energy of our thirsty
psyche, we Still not managed to put its existence in evidence! No evidence of
The reality of what we call God ... Not even a clue, just one
Which each religious system succeeds in making
Collide and contradict each other until fomenting wars in the name of
First principle doubtfully questionable!

I ask: How do you know that the divine would rejoice that we
Copulasions in order to lay? Have you read it in the Scriptures? Either, and
What deity do the Scriptures tell us? From an omnipotent and
Omniscient, is not it? Consider, then, that an omnipotent deity,
That is, who can do everything, including abolishing all pain, if only for the
Innocent, think that such a divinity, in view of the
Our planet crawls, can only be the Devil in person!
Yes, if God exists and is omnipotent, God is identical to the Demon.
We understand better then that he wants us to reproduce ourselves ...
Evil wants Evil, as parents want children.
Of necessity, the goodness of God is inversely proportional to his
power !

Our universe is revealed to be so lacking, that it would be the worst

To create creatures in the name of the One who inflicts so many evils on
His creatures.

Everything was created by God,

Therefore evil was created by God,
Therefore God is maleficent.

If God exists, let him manage without us: we do not have to

Making new prey, new slaves or new children
Of choir to enliven his celestial leisure. That it is satisfied with the 80 billion
Of creatures which mankind has already given him; 80 billion wolves-for man,
In the hands of the circle-of which-the-center-is-everywhere-and-the-circumferential-
Is not that sufficient?

Yes, that's quite enough.

We wear it every day in our fibers and in our

Soul: pain even advances as one of the safest constituents of the
Phenomenal world where the biontes struggle …

Since when, in a reasoning based on logic, a hypothesis

Would weigh the same weight as a certainty?

In doubt, it is better to abstain: this is the essence of the Principle of

Precaution, so much advocated nowadays where one never ceases to fantasize
On the zero risk …

In this regard, gentlemen of the Security Forces, we have the honor of

Announce: it is possible to escape from any risk, it is enough not to be born.
Smoking kills, life too.

By the way, let us remark that the founder of a religion

Who claims to know much about God, Christianity, has finally left
Very few carnal descendants ... Born of a virgin, Christ died virgin
And without children, not without asking us to make us eunuchs, of us
Castrate, in view of the Kingdom of Heaven! I do not perceive there a frightened call
To cuniculiform fecundity.

No incitement to reproduction in the Gospels, on the contrary, everything

The spirit of these is based on the eloquent concept of Imitatio Christi: follow the
Christ, to walk in his paradigmatic traces, to imitate our virtue on the
To mold our destiny on its stimulating redemptive example.

Well, dear Christian brothers, let us imitate Christ, invite mankind

To imitate it, to fall under its categorical imperative, and the
Fallen according to the sin of Eve will have disappeared, according to our wishes, in less
Of a century …

This radical hostility of Christ to progeny, not only

Gnostics had immediately identified him, but Kierkegaard himself
Will reaffirm its vigor. Here is what the Danish philosopher dared to
Pages of his Journal:

It goes without saying in the eyes of Christ that the Christian should not marry.
Reproduction of the species. Christianity wants to block it.
Put a child into the world! But the child is born in sin after
Have been conceived by offense, and this existence is a valley of tears.
No, the error is not that the priest is single ... a Christian
Must be. God wants [...] that man abandons this egoism that there is in
to give life. To save our species means: this species is lost, we do not
That it is a question of being saved on leaving the species, and consequently
We must start by blocking our species.
I thank God that no living being owes me existence.
A crime has brought me into the world, has brought me against the will
of God. The fault, which in one sense is not mine, though
To make me a criminal in the eyes of God is to give life.

Stunning concerto of baffes in major punch!

Obviously most of our so-called Christians have never read anything
This author, their intellectual comfort and even more their sexual satisfaction
Depended on it …

Notwithstanding, on the Century, St. Augustine, in his treatise La Virginité

Consecrated, had already launched this vigorous warning:
"It is no longer serving Christ to multiply the human race. "
(Which race at that time, however, did not include more than three
Hundreds of millions of individuals ...)

The same Father of the Church finally had these definitive and lacerating words
In his book On the Good of Marriage:

"I know some who whisper: '' And if everyone wanted

To abstain from marriage, how mankind will survive? ''
- If only they all wanted it! [...]: thus the City of God
Would realize more quickly, and the end of the world would be hastened. "

Here is a call without appeal: Salvation is Extinction!

Ah, if only they all wanted it, if only they wanted to
Christians, these nauseous Christians.

Salvation is Extinction. The various spiritualities of India do not

Hinduism, Jainism, or the rule of law.
Of Buddhism, their soteriological aim remains identical: to end the
Birth Cycle (Samsâra)!

To leave the phenomenal world, to free the soul from all terrestrial incarnation,
Escape from the pain of existing: these thinkers would be
Secretly anti-natalists? The least that can be said is that their contempt
Of the sensible world combined with their desire not to be reborn here below does not grow
Certainly not, from an exegetical point of view, to multiply the deliveries ...

Some examples :

Grace is to show the truth that delivers, grace is the cause of

The release of the cycle of births and deaths.
- Shiva Purana. India, circa IXth century.

The sages who have devoted themselves to the method of vigilance,

Who have renounced the fruit born of acts,
Those will be freed from the bond of rebirth And go to the place that knows no grief.
- Bhagavad Gita. India, circa I century BC. AD
Will go to the exact opposite of our world where according to the Mahabharata,
Let us recall it: "Only, indeed, pain exists; This is why we do not get
happiness. "

Let us conclude on these few excerpts from the Bardo-Tholol, the famous "Book
Tibetan of the Dead ", which chants as a leitmotiv the precept of" close
The doors of the matrix ":

Those who have not received the teaching of a Lama will fall into the
Precipices and abysses of the world of the cycle of existences where they
Eternally persecuted by abominable sufferings. Listening
Therefore my teaching. I showed you the instructions to close
The doors of the womb by conjuring attraction and aversion.
If you understand from the bottom of your heart that everything is
Lie, the door of the womb will close.
I no longer want this cycle of existences. My heart feared and
Refuses ceaselessly.

All religious literature of Indian influence abounds in such refusals

To be born again (therefore to be born); We could quote text after text, school
After school, but everything was said as early as the seventh
Century BC, in the famous
Chândogya Upanishad: "May I never return to the shining membrane,
Which devours without teeth - never return to the membrane. "

Knowing that this membrane, according to all the commentators,

Maternal breast, and more precisely the amnios or the placenta ... Curtain.
What are we waiting for to "lock the uterus"
In Nirvana is nothing else, etymologically, than to enjoy
Extinction …

In Judaism, everyone remembers Job's disgust with Job

Of his being-in-the-world:
Why did I not die when I came out of the womb,
Did I not perish immediately?
Why was there two knees to welcome me,
Two breasts for breastfeeding?
Now I would sleep in peace,
I would sleep with a restful sleep.
Why give unhappy the light,
 Life to those who have bitterness at heart,
Who aspire after death without her coming,
Search for him more than for a treasure?
They would rejoice in front of the funereal mound,
Exult to find the grave.
Man is born for pain.
Man, born of woman,
A short life, but torments to satiety.
- Book of Job. Israel, Fifth
Century. AD

These radical protests of the Just-crushed-Injustice against the day he

Have nothing isolated, they are happily redoubled by
Those of Jeremiah or Ecclesiastes:

Cursed be the day I was born!

The day my mother choked me, let him not be blessed!
Cursed be the man who told my father
This news: "A son, a boy was born to you! "
Why did I come out of the womb?
To see torment and pain.
- Jeremiah. Israel, VIth Century. AD

I hate life.
I congratulate the dead who are already dead rather than the living who are
Still alive. And happier than both is the one who does not live
Not yet, and see not the iniquity that is done under the sun.
Better is a name than fine oil, and the day of death than the day
Of birth.
- The Ecclesiastes (Qohelet). Israel, Third Century. AD

If I read well, all these recriminations of seers and prophets twinkle

A certain anti-natalist moire, at least do not express the most
Gratitude to the scoundrels who give rise to us ...
But above all, Judaism and Islam give us, in the
Most religions, a major argument for the pessimist: they
On the theme of the Fall. We live in a world that is not yet
Quite hell, but certainly not Paradise! The existence
Is a long exile, a place of atonement, a desperate search, never
The Messiah and the Promised Land ... Our ancestors committed
Monumental blunder, by tasting the fruit of the serpent, O fecundity, and we
Let us cease to suffer punishment! To live, a punishment? The Bible and the Qur'an
Do not say anything else ... Why invite non-existents to come share
Our fate as convicts?

Let us rather acquiesce in the lucidity of the sages of Zion:

"The counting of opinions was made within the Academy, and we observed
That the majority [of the rabbis] was of the opinion that it would have been
Better the man not having been created. "
Aggadah (Jewish legendary). Israel, circa V Century.

This pessimism as to our human condition conditions innumerable

Traditions since the Ages of Gold, Silver and Bronze still stand
Behind us and that we live in the Age of Iron, in the Kali-Yuga, eras
Of general degradation and ferocity where bliss and perfection are no longer
Than vain words, imbued with utopian memories or imbued with impatience
Messianic …

Whether it is the nostalgia of lost paradise or the expectation of a world

Best, the confession remains the same: our terrestrial stay we dissatisfied if
Violently that all religion is constituted as the hope both of
Immediate remedy for the distress of the day than for future consolation at all
Suffering that a trajectory of anthropic. Happy, humanity would
Invented neither gods nor other worlds …

(Parenthesis, it will be noted that the optimist is always constrained

To seek out of the real or out of the present its infamous "reasons" for hoping:

God, Future, Beyond, Progress, draw the eternal pockets of Elsewhere from where
The meliorist surreptitiously extracts the artificial rabbits from his joviality ...
It is true that if he were content to observe the observable, he would arrive
To the same conclusions as the pessimist: "Misfortune triumphs over everything and
Living is more painful than not living ". Hope is not a virtue
Phenomenalism: all vitalism corresponds either to fraud or to
Perspective error.)

Let. For their part, Orphism, Pythagorism, Platonism and Neoplatonism

Ceaselessly consider the body as a tomb or
An expiatory prison beyond which the soul languishes to escape, indicating
So that the incarnation that our parents inflict on us merits
Really no particular praise …

Finally, in a most explicit way, Gnostic, Manichaean,

Bogomils and cathars will consider our universe as the work of the Devil
And that it will be possible to put an end to the suffering from which it
By refusing to reproduce!

One can only bow to the Gnostic logic: if, as

Saint John and Saint Paul say twice, the Devil is the Prince of
World, it would be criminal to shape him new subjects.

Obviously, procreating is ultimately less perpetuating the species than

Evil in all its forms.

It is superfluous to insist: if a metaphysico-religious injunction

A, it seems rather to go in the direction of Refus de Procreer than in that of
Of hyperbolic fecundity! It is therefore hard to see how it would be argued
Seriously of God to endorse trivial uterine itching.

But if childhood by "love" does not hold the road (we do not
The suffering certain a being that one loves authentically), if want
"Prolong the species" is the last absurd (it is in any case promised
To extinction), if parturition under "metaphysical pretext" contradicts
The teaching of the greatest sages, what remains in the quiver of the
Natalists to justify their perpetual obsession? More
Admit it, and what remains is so nauseating that we will not dwell on it
hardly.

f. Child-chrematistic

Political discourse thus dares to boast economic reproduction:

Children should be manufactured in order to guarantee the financing of pensions
In the coming decades, in order to rejuvenate the declining
Avoid a dangerous reversal of the age pyramid, or
To support industrial growth (since the so-called expanding demographics
Of course, a larger market), and so on.

So many emetic speeches that are regularly

Dominant media.

This is the theme of the child-plutodote, dispenser of wealth:

It goes without saying that this argument of fertility as a source of prosperity
Contradicts the minimum requirements of Ethics, since it is based on
Reification and instrumentalisation of the Other, that is to say on the principle itself
Of slavery ... We ask an individual to be born in order to help us
Solving our economic problems: what pestilence, what sordidity!
It is sometimes regretted that there are so few politicians slapped in
public.

g. Child-Soldier

Other tabs will make of the reproduction a patriotic act! The

The nation is numerous, the more powerful it is; It would be wrong to believe
That such repugnant fertility attitudes are a thing of the past:
Constant exhortations to the large family still resonate in the
Senile and fetid mouth of those who serve as popes to "Christendom", attesting
That religious war is gained above all on the ground of the uterus ... What would
The Vatican without fresh flocks to feed its coffers, strengthen its
Power and ensure its global expansion? Instrumentation + Reification
Of the individual = Slavery, we said ... What a difference between a child
Who is born to increase the ranks of Christendom and a simple child soldier?
None: both are forcibly enlisted to fight
Vain all evil figures proliferating within our valley of tears.

h. Nature

You will hardly have refuted all these hideous pretexts that will serve you
Worst, the most specious and the most unwelcome, of all the "arguments" in favor of
Of motherhood: that of Nature! It is "natural" to generate, and therefore,
As if it were self-evident, legitimate to surrender.

Alas, nature is barbarism, the state of war of all against all, as

Hobbes pointed out. Nature means Aggression and Cruelty put to service
Of the survival instinct of each individual. Living on the unique mode of
"Eat-before-to-be-eaten," Nature knows only one Law,
That of the jungle, that of the strongest, the most violent or the most cunning,
Able to establish his narcissistic domination over the other living.
To those who will invoke Nature, the instinctual impulse, for
Justify their offspring whim, we will point out that theft,
Murder and rape also correspond to instinctual instincts and
This does not endorse them in the eyes of the ethical requirement ...

Nothing is more natural for Nature than to surrender

All the atrocities!

Should violence and murder be congratulated because they are part of the
Nature ? No, is not it? Hence, why should we bow,
Without further analysis, before the reproductive instinct under cover
of nature ?

Everything in nature is nothing but robbery and assassination.

- Remy de Gourmont, Physics of Love.

Nature is atrocious in reality!

- Théodore Monod (as part of an interview).

Life, game of massacre.

- Jean Rostand, Thoughts of a Biologist.

In nature, war is omnipresent.

- Konrad Lorenz, The Aggression. A Natural History of Evil.

Nature's argument is precisely that of Sade,

Nazis, and ultimately of all those who believe that Darwinism (as
Legitimate triumph of the most fierce) remains the final word of ethics and
Of human wisdom. Acquiescence à la Nature means acquiescing to all
Our impulses, even if they were atrociously detrimental to others.
To absolve a rapist under the pretext that he has responded to the call of Nature?
So why do we congratulate our parents for following the
Nature ? Violors and procreators do not inflict intolerable torments
To their victims?

Nature, our mother at all, never speaks of us but ourselves;

Nothing is selfish like his voice.

Cruelty [...] is the first feeling that the

Nature.
 Cruelty is in nature; We are all born with a dose of
Cruelty that only education alters.
- Sade, Philosophy in the Boudoir.

Forget Nature, man, by chance, has become a being of Culture;

Its law should no longer be that of instinct but rather that of
Ethics.

The "argument" of Nature lying convivially massacred, let us pass to

following.

i. Envy

If you are looking to know the ultimate mobile of coming to the day of
New victims, ask the future parents about the reason for their
Parenthood: they will answer you most naively of the world that they make
Child because they want it! At least they do not lie,
They sell the wick: they feel a desire for a child, they find
That "cute", "charming", "moving", "funny", "nice"
"Sympathetic", "motivating" and that's all! They generate to satisfy
A thirst, a pruritus, a concupiscence! The child, we said at the outset,
Nothing but a gift that parents make to themselves. The question Remains to know if the desire
to inflict suffering on his Or not compatible with ethics: we shall devote a chapter to it.

One procreates then sometimes from necessity, sometimes from pleasure. The first
Sadism, and the second of sadism, whatever
Or the occurrence, one never procreates except by absolute egoism! The child is
Never conceived as an end but always as a means, is
Proceeds from a pure machiavellism!
 Posture iii
Mobiles and Real Mechanisms
Of Procreation

The children are there to prevent

The parents to be bored.
- Ivan Turgenev, The Journal of a
Man of too much. Russia, Nineteenth
century.

The concepts of excrement, child and penis

Split badly and exchange easily between them.
When the child enters the scene, sexual investigations
Recognize it as excrement and invest it
Of a powerful anal erotic interest.
- Sigmund Freud, The Sexual Life. Austria, 20th Century

Mothers who are neither oppressive

Nor selfish are as rare as a Mozart!
- Elisabeth Badinter, Interview
(In Le Soir, 28 May 2003). France, XXIe century.

Now let us take a closer look at the actual springs that

Incite to bequeath the curse of existing to the innocent resting for the hour
In the most peaceful of vacuities. O Nothingness, no cry ever crossed
Empire: what poet will say your genius, what mystic will celebrate your immortal
Imperfectibility?

Let us pass on this access of lyricism, and return to our pigs.

a. Bestialisme

As we have already mentioned, the desire for a child is rooted essentially

In DNA: we are programmed, in the strong sense, in the computer sense,
To mate and make creatures to take over
When life has finished killing us. From the insect to the engineer, by the way
By the cloporte, the mygale, the python, the cuttlefish, the gendarme, the housewife
And the aardvark, copulates and seeks to reproduce. Our children are not
As well as the fruit of our bestiality, our delirious servitude, strictly
Robotics, facing the prescriptions of instinct. We only procreate because
That we remain animals unable to meet the requirements
Superiors of our humanity! Engendering is in effect submitting as
The last of the automata to the humiliating imperatives of nature, to his ferocity
Confraternity, its blind barbarity, its morbid cruelty. Rats also make
Babies, but the rats have no choice: a man grows to ape
Rats? Come now, our parents, these mundane breeders, are no better
Than livestock farming our farms.

b. Sadism

Despite our blatant denials, we know

Child suffers, that to live means to expose oneself to innumerable diseases,
Injuries, worries, trials, disappointments and prejudices. And yet, we
Choose to bring to light such a creature condemned to suffer the whole
Bouquet of these inesquivable sufferings. But if we order him to
It is only in order to give us pleasure, to us
spawners. What exactly is sadism? Nothing else
Derive pleasure from the suffering we inflict on our fellows!
The conclusion is obvious: parents are sadists in their own right; Do not
Do not forgive: they know very well what they are doing!

c. Narcissism

Sigmund Freud, in La Vie Sexuelle, had already blatantly unmasked our

Executioners, when he wrote that:

Parenting love, so moving, and, in its depth, so puerile, is not

Nothing but the narcissism of the resuscitated parents who, although
Transformed into object love, infallibly reveals its first nature.

It is evident that if the breeders did not love themselves over

All, they would easily abstain from making fetuses. We have it
Seen, they force us to come to suffer here below in order to find their happiness there,
At least they hope. As Lichtenberg put it so well:
Love neither his father, nor his mother, nor his wife, nor his children, but the sensations
Pleasant to us. "

Through their offspring, the rejectors adore only themselves,

Care that to satisfy their desires, only to transmit their genes, that to ensure,
Lamentable illusion, their survival, than to recognize their painted
Figure of their baby. Engendrer is nothing but worship
Possessive pronoun that flatter us, worship môque, veneration of oneself:
Pure navel.

How long will we tolerate the abject autolatry of these

Individuals who care for the well-being of their umbilicus by condem-
Innocent to suffer all the ambient misfortunes?
If it were otherwise, if the most scandalous narcissism did not
Not the genetic steps, if really any generosity motivated
Our odious parents, the candidates for adoption would be incredibly
Many millions of children waiting, at this very hour, to be
Adopted! But talk about adoption to baby lovers, you will see a
Greasy pout of "yes-but-not-for-me" drawing themselves on their greedy facies of
To possess an entire prey emanating from their entrails. Orphans? The
Baby of another? Come on, call the scientists
Help me to defeat my infertility! (For Nature does not always do well
things…)

Definitely loving only themselves, what respect do our

Parents? The care they give us is only intended to maintain
Good condition the object of their self-centered enjoyment ... If they were concerned
Sincerity of their children's happiness, it seems clear that they would have
Abstentions from bringing them into the world.
d. Selfishness - Egocentrism
Possessiveness - Avarice - Anality

This way of taking as reference only his own inclinations and

To protect one's interests to the detriment of those of another indicates
The most vile egoism taints the parental enthusiasm,
We know enough about what odious possessiveness it leads almost
Systematically, even if it were to spoil the very existence of
Of the child ... The influence of "parental love"
Suicidal tendencies of adolescents. For many, death is the last
Escape from family tentacles.

It goes without saying that this proverbial possessiveness of the parents is similar
To the vice of avarice, thus testifying to the sinister anality which
Command to the desire to make of a baby its intimate property.

Always in the continuation of the "narcissistic nebula" which summarizes

All the parental psychology, the obstinacy of the procreators
To ignore the arguments against their unclear project reveals
What egocentrism characterizes them: taking themselves for the center of all
Psychically annihilating anything that does not serve their
Contentment, how would the childbearers care so much about their children
Than the virtues of philosophical discourse? Self-referential affectivity makes
Deaf, it is notorious.

Needless to try to make them hear Reason, entrenched in their

The most visceral pulses, the hungry wombs have no ear. The parents
Want, and their unthinking egotism convinces them a priori of the merits of
Their will. The begetters engender, they never think. " I want " :
That is their whole philosophy …

e. Infantilism

Impermeable to altruism, narcissistically imbued with themselves, captives

Of their most primary impulses, incapable of repressing their sadism
Innocent, true impotents of sublimation, the pedoplasts are decidedly
Shows a disagreeable infantilism; Their maturity leaving more than desire,
This trait of their hateful personality was emphasized by the unconscious
Language itself. Thus, does the term "baby" derive directly from Latin
Pupa which means nothing but the doll!
Literally, the child is the doll of his parents! Their toy ... The victim
Impotent of this pitiful process of ludification has only to pass from hands
Gesticulating chirps and the abyssal abyss of
Those who have entered a maternity ward in the way they once entered
In a toy shop: jaws full of greed.

It has long been believed that the girl who plays with the doll imitates her mother,
It is not the case: the mother, on the contrary, uses her adult body
To satisfy his childish psyche with a toy of flesh! You
Thus, most naturally, most foolishly in the world, from 6 to 66 years. We
Would never err, nor risk a lawsuit in defamation, treating a
Young childish genitress. it plays…

As for the father, he finds in his offspring much better than the soldier of lead
Of his own childhood: he has a living creature entirely subject to
His orders of eternal little corporal frustrated.
Watch these two fools frolic with their toddler: it enjoys, it
Enjoy the privilege of finally being able to entertain with the articulated mannequin
Ideal of which their juvenility dreamed. A true one: who weeps, struggles, shouts and suffers!
Orgasm!

All the young children already play "papa-maman" ... If a

Other evidence of distressing parental infantilism, see at what age a girl
Pronounces the fatal sentence: "Mo zooci ze want zun enfant! Ze will marry me
And there will be three! ". A woman feels like a child long before she
Language or the age of reason: what a pity that neither language nor
In general, nothing against this diabolical envy.

Becoming a parent, making a baby, it is not at all flourishing

Its potential as an adult, on the contrary it offers a resounding proof of its
Mental retardation, his immaturity, his incompetence
Tragic face to the real questions of the sphinx in which ferments the destiny.
At baptism, just offer lollipops to the young parents: they
Will find theirs.

f. Mimicry

This child-toy, its torturers also shape it for the sake of folding
The socio-cultural paradigm in force; Fearful of pouring into a wave
Marginality and to wipe public discrediting or rejection, couples
Align themselves with the ambient fertility. Cultural conditioning strengthens here
The deoxyribo-nucleic conditioning: Africa or Islam valorize the
Family, so every African or Muslim will demand for himself
a big family ; Europe sees a fairly positive
Two children, so every European will endeavor to found a family of two
Children, etc. Radically childish, as we have just seen, the father
Monkey its societal environment: the way in which we used to go
Mechanically in the church, we still give birth today simply because
That all children …

Like the wearing of the tie, this symbolic accessory by which our
Society is so successful in keeping the individual on a leash, procreation is part of
This adaptive reflex which gives rise to the most scatological conformism.
Too cowardly to resist social pressures, to face reproach
Of incivility, or to dare some form of isolation in what he
Aristocratic, many become parents without the slightest
Conviction but with the tranquility of soul of those who to the questioning question
"Well, that's for when the first one?" "May evade any risk of
Reprobation by launching "For soon, for soon, it is on the march". How many
Noble yet to retort: "For ever, my lords, the cruelty to me
Lacking "...

But in sum, should we marvel at the gregariousness of those who

Share with the cattle the instinct of reproduction?

In addition to this concern for compliance with the standard,

Of mimetic desire, to speak like René Girard, of the desire to desire this
That the neighbor wants so as not to allow him to possess what you yourself
Would not possess …

g. Jealousy

We enter here into what might be called Rachel's complex,

Thus in Genesis 30, 1: Rachel, seeing that she herself did not give children
To Jacob, became jealous of her sister, and she said to Jacob, "Have me also
Children or I die! ".

Jealousy, yes many become parents by pathological jealousy

Friends or other family members, if not to their own
Fathers and mothers; This is not only a problem for adolescent girls
Sometimes triggers a true epidemic of births during their
Explains to himself alone a whole facet of the desire of child; Some of them
The most afflicted of a serious inferiority complex, take the lead and
Hurry towards motherhood in order to create jealousy in their entourage!
This perversity (one sees to what objectal rank is reduced the baby ...)
Sometimes confine itself to dementia and turn into a real competition.
Will make the greatest number of unhappy, a morbid emulation where the victims
End up being counted by dozens fallen from the bowels of a single couple
Of maniacs! In my opinion, all these ranges, rivalry for rivalry,
But not the scope of a work of art. Liberi aut libri, it is mocking
since antiquity…

h. Pride

Notwithstanding their petty constitutionality, the providers ooze

Irresistibly of pride at the idea of having succeeded in insignificant prowess
To infuse life into a fragile piece of flesh, and thereby prove their
Ridiculous fertility, very inferior to that of cockroaches.

Secretly, they are intoxicated by imitating the divinity in its function

Every father is easily taken for God-the-Father and every mother
For Mother Earth; The Niobe complex, the myth of which
Tells how this fatal laying boar boasts of having more than
Descendants that Leto, the artemis and Artemis. The sanction of a
Such megalomania was not long in coming: the Spirit of Light, O symbol,
Massacred the thirteen offspring of the immodest sow while she was living
Metamorphosed into a limpid metaphor of his heart: a rock.

It goes without saying that the climax of parental pride is attained

In the pregnant woman whose smile is wasted and imbecile always crowns
The proverbial ventripotence. If only the pregnant could suspect that her
At first glance, only a pustule swollen with excrement
Corrupt, it would probably find it less prone to walk everywhere
The pocket where germinates the hydra of all our pains. If there is
Obscenity deserves to be sighted and stifled under an avalanche of
Tissues, it is indeed that of this funeral egg molded in the most pornographic
obesity. On the contrary, observe how wildly intoxicated
Presumption, a future torturer - a next deliverer will I want
To be dodlined by underlining the least of its reliefs in the certainty that
These bovine prominences make her the queen of the day ... Certainly Hathor-Isis Wore cow
horns, but all the same.

The pride of the father, notwithstanding, he was very sorry that he could not fly
Such a hypogaster and jealous of the privileges of gestation, proves
Part of an essentially testicular order, the baby playing the role of
Witness the proper functioning of its spermatothèque and clamant
Obviation to all the onlookers he had the chance to introduce at least once
Her wretch lives between the legs of a willing woman ...

In the perfidious unconscious of the father, his offspring is

Prolonging his erectile faculties, and he is constantly surprised at the
Rise up to heaven like a trophy conquered in the Olympiads of copulation.
The real bulls have more modesty: they are satisfied with
Continue to graze when a calf is born to them.

In short, the toddler is to his parents what the flag is to a nation: a

Vain emblem of sovereignty; The child appears most often only
To allow his parents to appear ...

i. Exhibitionism

No pride, indeed, who does not like to parade; And God knows if the parents
Foolish to strut with their unbearable progeny, invading to
Every opportunity all possible public places (parks, museums, theaters,
Hospitals, cemeteries, unemployment boards, etc.) by pushing
Bust, those caricatures of the coffin that are the prams or
Swinging their prey under the noses of passers-by in a kind of eloquent
Shopping basket from which emerges a nasty wailing head, to the delight of
Manufacturers who benefit from this, at little cost, from a siren
Attention-grabbing and stimulating for our murderous impulses
Repressed.

Transporting their victim everywhere, to the well-known phallic valency,

The imposing under each of our steps, the breeders are thus of a stone
Two bumps: they expose themselves in their proliferating bliss, flooding without
Scruples the atmosphere of their pestilential happiness, and enjoy the privilege
To be able to torture their fellow men with impunity by giving them
Ears of inexhaustible shouts of shouts of which one is astonished all the same that they
Did not shock our ethical sense earlier. For all the same, what
Accusation, what a charge, that this torrent of howls from
The throat of a creature obviously very unhappy to have to do The apprenticeship of the
innumerable, the scorching constraints which
Our world as hostile as it is unforgiving!

j. Despotism

If the defects of pride and ostentation afflict especially mothers, it is

An ignominy of which the fathers rejoice chiefly: the drunkenness of reigning!
The more a male suffers frustrations (think of all the poor fornicators,
To all the professional or emotional failures, to these innumerable
Phallophores whose mediocrity is such that they can not even
Mask), the more he will rejoice in the birth of a child that his very weakness
Designates as the ideal scapegoat. Every genitor feasts clandestinely
To exercise almost unlimited authority over the terrorized creature
He calls his child.

Punish to satiety, distribute orders, vomit prohibitions, inflict

Constraints and homework, shouting at will, hitting even cheeks, thighs and
Buttocks at the slightest disobedience, occasionally rebuffing by simple fad, power
Punishment at every (inevitable) academic or existential failure: this is one of the motives
Of the male desire for a child, finally the dwarf will be able to reign over a
Dwarf smaller than him! What father can claim to escape the pleasures of
Despotism? How ecstatic it is to be able to move on her progeny all the
Bullying that was made the object of being a child or not later than
Morning when a superior got angry about the poverty of your work and you
Gronda paternally …

Any child, in one way or another, becomes the pain-bearer of his or her
Parents, their domestic disorientation, sharing with the dog the sad function
Unconditional obedience to the whims of those who compensate themselves for
Their own humiliations over even more easily humiliating martyrs.
We are procreated because we are in search of a feeling of omnipotence
Which we have been lacking since we became
The world would fulfill almost none of our desires. We generate in hope
Of being able to reign as a tyrant over a creature who can only submit to
Our demands, since it depends entirely on our care, even bad!

Thus, on analysis, the family proves to be the archetype of all

The fascisms. The latter, moreover, have, indeed, never ceased
Of prolific family cells (ô slips) and to sing
Pretended "virtues" of patriarchy! Hymns taken up by the mafia, great
Amateur of traditional parental values …

Freud, to describe this attitude of exploitation-vampirisation of others,

Even went so far as to speak of cannibalism. The noun seems hardly to us
Spice.

Our parents have for us the tenderness of the rider for his mount. Little
What we will endure, we must be born to fill these
Two impotents! Young people, read again the adventures of Spartacus …

l. Pedophilia

Often it is not until the erotic impulses of his masters that

The child is not called to satisfy. A lot is being done today on
Pedophiles alien to the victim's family, it is a mistake: they are
Ten to fifteen times fewer than pedophiles who
Their own descendants ... In the case of pedophilia, if it is a category
Of the population that must be kept strictly in check, it is the parents themselves
!

All studies and reliable statistics, including

Of the US Department of Social Affairs, show that
Less than one child in ten is sexually assaulted by a member
Of his apparently trustworthy family before the age of
eighteen years.
The majority of sexual crimes committed against children are
Perpetrated by members of the family.
- Susan Forward, Toxic Parents. United States, 20th century.

Other official figures even mention one in eight children falling

Victim of the incoercible lubricities of his kinship!

Families, I hate you, exclaimed a visionary: how could he

chock ? What is shocking to me, on the other hand, is that you can
Feelings of sympathy for these nests of vipers, which are
Of family environments.

Those threatened to invade skepticism about the nature intimately

Pedophilia of parental feelings about their toys, that they
Seriously to this: if it was necessary to establish on the whole surface of the globe the Incest and
punish its transgression in the most dramatic and
The most dissuasive that is, it is precisely because the temptation of incest
Bubbles volcanically at the very heart of parental psychology!
It is only a necessary corollary of their visceral egocentrism,
A direct consequence of their primordial narcissism: the child appears
Parents as a mere appendix of themselves, of which they
Feel free to use as they wish if salutary laws did not come from
Even discourage them!

It is no exaggeration to speak of systematic eroticization of the child

Part of her parents: see how these perverts overwhelm her with kisses and
Caresses, embrace, touch and manipulate him constantly; require
Frequent cuddles, kisses, and accolades; Wear it according to their own
Seduction fantasies, thus prostituting it to the eyes of those
To make envious; Agree on his person all the pleasures of the bath in
Meticulously washing her cock, anus and buttocks before massaging
His whole body by drying it (and what about kisses reiterated on his feet,
On its posterior, even on its adorable little genitals or
Native languages that often slip with verve on the entire body of
Baby: "tenderness and witness of love" will be exculpated; No: pulses
Incestuous poorly suppressed and partial erotic satisfaction); See also
How they engage in voyeurism by photographing their nudity,
Scatology by changing its layers (thus reviving their own pleasures
Infantiles related to play with feces), to sadism by administering spanking
Or fetishism by keeping bottles, bibs as well as first
Clothing and footwear; Observe finally the numerous touches, tickling
And tumbling to which they engage on their offspring under the pretext of games
Innocent but who have nothing to envy the erotic preliminaries,
etc. Finally, we will refrain from insisting on the complacency of certain
Genitals to the enjoyments of breastfeeding, breasts sucked by holy suckers,
And, in the same way, to pass over in silence the innumerable mothers
Who masturbate their son "to help him fall asleep", or take him in their
Bed to console him, or bathe naked with him, or even try to
Adolescence to keep her away from other women by preventing her from
His way and to go out in places of seduction conducive to his emancipation
Sentimental ... As for the fathers, without dwelling on the infinity of those who make
Love to their wives by thinking of the "flesh of their flesh", there is no
The more the bruises or the cruelties or even the rapes that the boldest
Of them practice on their daughter "so adored" …

Thus, a true pedophilia, latent or proven, characterizes all

No one escapes the temptation of incest, even if
Some people manage to live it only in symbolic form, for example in
Making sure that they have control over all the fundamental existential choices of
Their chicks, mainly as regards the election of their partner
Lover…

Let us go further, because the fact is well-documented: some pedophiles

Become parents only to have at their disposal a baby, a toy
Sexual, which does not risk to file a complaint!

Born of a sexual act, the child is always already invested with desires
Sexual relations; Some future parents even find, by their own
Direct sexual excitement at the idea of mating, "making love" in the
Purpose of "making a baby". Once born, they will welcome him
Often between their nuptial sheets, o for many years, both
Exciting child …

If there were other proofs of the pedophilic relationship than the unconscious
Parenting with the very young children, it would be enough to
"Baby" is commonly used to designate a partner
Possible or already conquered. Similarly, in French, "My Baby" addresses
As much to the lover as to the child, these two "cherished", these two "treasures" ...
Such lapses of the collective language confess to the sufficiency of the unhealthy
Ambiguity of Desire (Eros) whose child is the target.

Let us remember this unquestionable statistic: the next time you

Will contemplate a group of twenty children in a playground,
Remember that at least two of them have been, are or will be abused
Sexually by a member of their family, usually their father or
Father-in-law, but almost always with the tacit complicity of their mother!

Let us remain optimistic: the eighteen other children are

Only beaten or mistreated psychically, sometimes unloved, sometimes
Too much loved (psychological incest, love castrateur, possessivity ...) by
Parents who were incompetent because they had not
Training specific to parenting, as if the subtle art of educating, loving
And respect a toddler was innate whereas it is not until the act of
Walk or copulate that we did not have to learn ...

Hardly in truth if one child out of a hundred comes out of his childhood. Celuilà,
Paradox, will undoubtedly disdain to give birth, while all the others
Will wound their wounds by giving birth, in order to reproduce
On their offspring all the material or spiritual abuse of which they
Were themselves victims: an infernal cycle. Samsara.

m. Various perversions

Clearly, as our cryptographic work progresses, the

Supposed virtues of motherhood evaporate and curdle like milk
To reveal in ultimate analysis only a putrescent mass grave of vices
Altogether, tending to pour into the uncountable. We will try
However, by way of greeting in this respect that we must close,
Evoke laconically.

If it is desired so compulsively, it is to the truth because the child advances

With multiple drug efficiencies. This child-drug is
A true existential pharmacy on which the
The mediocrity and the weak are found; it is sometimes discovered as anxiolytic,
Remedy against the exhausting anguish of existing, or against that of the terrifying
Solitude, sometimes as an anabolic one since it fulfills the imperative function
On-semantics by conferring a sense, a finality, all temporary and
Immanent that they prove, to the destiny of those who engender it, their
Enabling them to find, at a low cost, a dynamic
To remove from them, at least for a time, the tenacious temptation of suicide;
For many the child thus serves as a paradoxical anti-depressant, euphoric
Capable of artificially masking their metaphysical distresses,
But it also proves to be a survival kit for days of lapse ("stick of
Old age "as is so scandalously admitted) or dressing
Its manufacturers affix to their frustrations, even crutch, if not prosthesis,
As when asked to fulfill the role of existential substitute,
The child having for "mission" to succeed where his disastrous parents
Have failed: having a descendant will allow the poor to taste
The luxury of living by proxy and savoring through it such and such success
Long fantasized …
Also within the framework of this compensation mechanism, the most petty
By the desire to find themselves at the center of attention, to
Little interest, to attract easy praise, and even, faced with this puny creature
Depend entirely on them, to feel at last indispensable, they the
Derisory, they majestically insignificant!

Maternity is not only a means of recovery or repair

Of failures, since, as a cement of the couple, the child also serves
A tool of appropriation of each spouse by the other, pledge of fidelity but
Especially possession, most often in the sense of enslavement of
The woman by the male: the child is therefore the object and the stake of power, if not of
As many divorces demonstrate ... It is still instrumental
Of identity research and a factor of socialization at low cost, signing,
In conformity with the societal pressures that demand it, belonging
To the human group of those who, for their misfortune but for their own
Prosperity, give it life.

Often the child assumes the function of a consolation batch:

How many unmarried women do not make a baby for the sole purpose of forgetting
Their amorous shipwrecks; For lack of a lover, pedophilia oblige, a child
The same thing ... Likewise, how many men do they not seek
To undo their missed childhood by inviting an uncreated at the bedside
Of their internal reconstruction? These will also be among the most
Ardent to intrench himself behind the child-hiding-place, the child-shield, formidable
Pretext to undertake no exceptional undertaking, to shirk
Superior, artistic or philanthropic, to flow in the most comfortable
Mediocrity, to "cuddle" their cowardice with the shelter of
Blows destined for the adventurer or the hallucinated rebel! Noble child,
If you knew how much you protect your own father even more
Do not protect you! The pram is only the bulwark of the cowards. Twenty years
To be able to oppose the solicitations of ethics: "Justice and
Revolution is very good, but I have mouths to feed, I, the unworthy,
The resignation, the superfluous, as Nietzsche stigmatized! Yes,
The true heroes are nulliparous.

In addition, psychoanalysis has shown that many young girls

Infant only for the sake of phallic compensation, offered through the
Toddler the coveted penis of the Father, or even by virile protest
Against their own family environment: the child is then conceived as
Weapon of revolt against our parents and opportunity to flee away from the middle
Stifling family. Paradox as frequent as it is distressing: to found a family
To get rid of his …

If some breed in hopes of escaping parental tyranny

And to assert in passing their own individuality, it happens on the other hand that
The laying shepherds (which one crosses with disgust in the public gardens
Among other birds of the same seed) yield, rather little heroically
Must be admitted, to the pressure of parents now wishing to become grandparents
And recapture a new toy, a new drug, a new
Object of sadistic domination, a new puppet to manipulate
Having grown too large, having even become unusable since
Access to his autonomy, in theory at least ... Children, you are beautiful and
The universal toy: your only rival is the dog, curled
Preference.

Among the perversities structuring the envy of a baby, we can not

More to mention the role of curiosity: what does it do
To have a child? To carry it in its intestines, to give it birth, to
Feeding, washing, educating, supporting, or even wearing
Mourning? So here is the child-experience, travel destination for
Tourists of existence, it distracts them and especially allows them to "discover-experience-
other-conditions du-potential inherent to their being-there-In-the-fully-human-to-their-
coextensive humanity
"To dwell like the Sorbobonnicoles who will soon be exonangling the philosophy and
Make industrializable. Some practice childbirth like others
Vivisection: morbid scoptophilia. These are of course the most
Predisposed to neglect the child as soon as the surprise …

Synthetically, in addition to obvious genetic programming,

Three fundamental psychic processes command our greed
Reproductive: we move on our offspring all our unresolved tensions,
Always already moving it into a domestic outlet or an affective dump;
We project upon it our own abysses, our own demons, our own
Infantile complexes, the macabre dance of our repressed fantasies; and finally
We assign to it its major function - compensation - which is to fill
The very indigence that constitutes us, to camouflage our failures, to cauterize
Our feeling of inferiority, of assuming all that we ourselves could not,
And can never assume, in short, to deploy in the future in order to
We save the trouble of having to take our own ontological flight …
To conclude, let us simply keep in mind that the Real Child is always sacrificed
To the Imaginary Child and that its only reason for existence is to become a slave to
Two destinies which have failed to fulfill themselves in their asceity.

In all cases, regardless of the fallacious motive invoked for

Throw it on earth, we see a reification doubled by an instrumentalization
Of the Child: it is always thought of as a means whose sole purpose is to
To bring satisfaction to those who desire to come into the world!

In looking at it, no child exists for its own

Are merely appendices of desiderata, chimeras, expectations and
Parental pruritus. There is no legitimate child, there is only one scapegoat
Burdened with the magma of our burdens. Everyone is born only to become
Sense, the scapegoat of his parents. According to the law of selfishness
If the child did not soothe our wounds, we would not
In clutter!

Posture IV
But then how can it be
That we loved such monsters,
our parents ?

Relations between parents and children are, in nine out of ten cases,
A source of misery for both parties and, in 99 cases out of a hundred,
A source of misery for at least one of the parts.
- Bertrand Russell, The Conquest of Happiness.
England, twentieth century.

Do we really have a choice? Born in a hostile world,

To which we are radically unable to respond, where
Can we hope to find lodging, food, protection as well as a semblance
Of affection, hypocritical and egocentric, if not in the other
Parenting? For many of us, our parents were only a pisaler
: It is true that we did not choose them but it is even safer
That we shall discover no less disastrous asylum than they will wish
Well offer us. The street, the orphanage have something even more
A family home: we will therefore remain with the
All our evils since fleeing them would in all likelihood
The worst. Rather a toy than waste, intuitively guesses the child ...

Is it necessary to quote again the aphorism of Lichtenberg?

"You do not love your father, your mother, your wife, your children,
But the pleasant sensations they cause us. "

Enchanting on this maxim which explains in a very satisfactory way

The apparent paradox of the tenderness we feel for our torturers,
Freud speaks about love by shoring: the child "loves" creatures
Who put themselves at the service of his self-preservation urges, bringing him
Food, care and protection (against the aggressiveness of the real, against other
Adults or other polymorphic pervers ...), consoling him of his distress and
Guaranteeing the satisfaction of its vital as well as psycho-affective needs.
In short, we love our breeders as we love their home or an ice cream
With raspberry.

The child, inevitably needing them, does not cherish his parents
All his profits: his radical egoism has nothing to envy
Of its fashioners, except that it has as its foundation justice!
From our early childhood, a positive association
Between the notion of "parents" and that of "well-being": the love we
Testimony to our parents is actually much more of the conditioned reflex,
Of a Pavlovian salivation, than of an authentic sentiment!

This is for the material motive, of immediate interest, which encourages us to

"Love" our parents, but there is deeper and the ethology here is of a
Great help: it forces us to the most vigorous suspicion with regard to our
Filial feelings by offering us the theory of the imprint.

It is known that the latter describes the automatic and lasting attachment
From an animal baby to the first creature (or even to the first object with
Movement ...) that it meets when leaving the egg or the one that will have loaded
Of its diet. A lamb will thus take affection -
Will persist until adulthood! - for the person who has bottle-fed him,
While ducklings will consider as their mother any
Animated trinket discovered at birth (colored balloon, mobile box, duck
Mechanical, ethologist ...).
It is no different for the human species: the baby attaches
Stupidly to what he finds when leaving the vagina (usually a mother, more
Or poor) and to the organism that takes the trouble to feed it (a
Wolf or a monkey, examples attested, sometimes suffice).
Programmed to grab the first lifebuoy coming,
The child does not like, it is fixed: it likes the owner of the breast that sucks
Like the lamprey the fish it devours.

The theory of impregnation thus teaches us: the human animal

Possesses, in the form of genetic instructions, an innate coding,
Patterns of psycho-affective attachment to any creature that
Provide vital first aid and ensure its survival; Quickly
Libidinal patterns will cause almost irreversible attachment to imago
Maternity regardless of the intrinsic qualities or merit of the
Mother.

Our "love" for our parents thus proceeds infinitely less than one
Choice, gratitude, only a ferocious determinism, a mere drive
Adaptive! We do not like our germinators, we are
Impregnated, like a fabric of an ink stain …

As if that were not enough, our spawners are engaging our juvenile soul
Of wax to a true conditioning work: during all our childhood
And until adolescence, the slightest motion of aggressiveness on our part
Against our father or mother (irritation, blow, insult, refusal to obey), we
Receive a terrifying commendation or exemplary punishment. "Is it
That we speak in this tone to his parents? "We have all heard this warning,
But who among us, who feared so much the omnipotence of these brutes,
We depended, dared to retort "Yes, whenever they deserve it! "? It was
The slap assured, for one as for the other …

Permanently threatened with physical and psychic sanctions (deprivations,

Punishments), if one takes the pulse of his unconscious, one discovers
The child likes his parents less than he feels, the
Force being more than its disadvantage …

In addition, if at least one talent is to be recognized for our

That they are masters in the art of blackmail and seduction by
Constrained: "Be wise, if not! ; Come come and kiss Mom; It's not good
Not to love his parents; If you are wicked, you know what is waiting for you! ; If you are not
Not nice, you will not have gifts; Well, you do not give a kiss to
dad ? ": So many formulas run-in well able to abolish, repressing them
Under the pressure of guilt, animosity and resentment
That our young people often see being born with regard to those who spend their
Life to overwhelm us with orders and prohibitions to mold us on their own
Personality deficient ....

Despite the fantasies of devouring and destroying that we experience

All against our accursed progenitors, such tenacious fantasies
Universal and so well emphasized by psychoanalysis, all our
Embryos of revolt were systematically suppressed in the uterus. We
Literally trained to respect our designers: not only these
Used all possible means of coercion that their Despotism to bring us to submission, deference
and a sham Affection, but, through school constraint, society itself went so far as to
Inculcate the duty of proving our tenderness by making them
Or by purchasing them some present menu, pledge of allegiance, for each
Of their festivals!

Bathed in the cult of parenting introduced by the parents themselves,

Is it any wonder that with Confucius we should make filial piety a virtue
The public? The Muslim child becomes a Muslim, the Jewish child becomes
Jew, the Buddhist child becomes Buddhist, the child of the capitalist becomes
Capitalist, the child of parents becomes parentalist: what a wonder, what
Surprise…

In addition, we are forced to practice all the more

The irrational idealization of our parents that they were almost our only
Reference in our first decisive years. These pseudo-magicians who
Succeed in accomplishing under our impressionable eyes everything that fails
Our puerile childishness are none other than our procreators, how
How could we, even adults, contemplate them from above? We respect
Our parents because they seemed to be endowed with divine powers and
Mysterious talents to our child soul as ignorant as impotent …

Let's face it, our feelings for our manufacturers have something
Obtuse, fallacious, and mechanical. Were we born progeny of
Neighbor, we would love the neighbor and not the others without hearts
Chance has imposed us as sires. We blindly cherish those
In the arms of which nature catapults us; But we still love them
Less on the basis of their real merits than on the fourfold imperative of
The Stamping, the Footprint, the Conditioning and the Idealisation …

In this regard, it should be noted that the difficulties

Encounters all forms of anti-natalism to make their way to the debate
Of the original solidification of all psyches.
Around the parent figures. The human soul is constructed in interrelation if
Her parents that she can not bring them into
In peril its very foundations! Yes, we are a priori condemned to
Respect, if not our parents (it is still so harmful that nothing
Can hinder their legitimate hatred), at least the notion of
parenting. Daring to contest its value presupposes that it has succeeded in posing its
Look above the human, too human. Doubt that in our century
Always cruelly dominated by the barbarism with planetary vocation, much
Prove capable of such a leap towards theoretical transcendence.

As Jung himself admitted, following a cohort of thinkers:

"Humanity in its most important part is still, psychologically
Speaking, to a state of childhood ". Let's bet that as soon as grown up,
Authentically lucid and spiritual, it will observe with a different eye the idol
Hideous of her ultimate dogmatic fetishism: Reproduction.

This chapter hopes to have contributed to clarify the superficial paradox between
Dissatisfaction (its universality was established above) which should
In all logic we push to hate those whose navelist malice
Banishes us from the serenity of nothingness and affection, nevertheless always
Ambiguous, that we seem to bear.

In truth, know it, in its depths, even if they have the illusion of being
(An illusion which, moreover, fills their own narcissistic desire wonderfully),
The child does not like his parents: he dreads them, exploits them and manipulates them
Its maximum profit to ensure its welfare, but ultimately does not
Another passion than himself; He simply appreciates those in his
Interest to appreciate, for example the people he receives cuddles, treats,
Gifts, confectionery, security, money, etc. It is true that most often
These people happen to be his own parents, but why should we be surprised
Since it is indeed in order to pouponner and to appropriate it
That they have begotten him!

But above all, even if cunning remains the strength of the weak, any offspring
Is attached to its parents only because it has no alternative:
Impossible to get rid of the diktat of impregnation, imagine it run away
Twelve months in order to seek out the competent adoptive parents he deserves?

Who has never heard of the phenomenon, conceptualized under the name
Stockholm Syndrome, where the victim falls in love with her
Executioner? Such a thing is possible only because it finds in
The latter the very image of those who have engendered it. A child to survive
Has no other resource than to convert to masochism: without
To escape, he must love the sadists who have inflicted on him the existence and find, willingly
His pleasure in everything they do to him …

Anyone who sees his parents as they are would hurry to pass them
The throat over the saber.
 Posture v
Incompatibility
Between Ethics and Procreation

The hero for enlightenment does not harm any being.

- The Teaching of Akshayamati. India, circa Ist century.

Had it not been because of the inclination to evil,

No man would have procured children.
- Genesis Rabba. Israel, Fifth century.

What distinguishes false morality from sound morality:

The first seeks only to remedy the evil,
While the second ensures that the causes
Do not exist.
- Emmanuel Kant, Observations. Germany, Eighteenth century.

An earlier section locked the demonstration: the parents, far away

To be the paragons of all virtue appear rather like the minions of
All the vices. Nothing justifies our fall in this sad world except to come
To satisfy the whims, to reduce frustrations and to satisfy emotional needs
Of those who make us fall.

And if procreation is the subject of so much praise, of an ecumenical

Dithyramb, as formerly war and slavery, it was only because
That the ocean of unfulfilled and irresponsible
All want to enjoy in their turn the satisfaction of becoming
Procurators: we never condemn a crime that we have the firm intention
To commit yourself …

It remains to be seen whether such satisfaction, that of becoming parents,

Proves to be legitimate from a philosophical point of view, if it is aligned
Acceptable ethical criteria, or on the contrary is contrary to any
synderesis …

Let us first specify our notion of ethics: we will call

Ethics the search for a universalizable rule of conduct based on reason
Philosophy, in order to distinguish it clearly from Morality which does not reflect
That the arbitrary and consensual development of the values of a given
A time, habit and doxa (as a lack of thinking
Collective law) making here more law than the reflection carried out according to the
Disinfectants of wisdom ... La Morale varies according to the morals and
Humors, ethics strives to attain to the objectifiable. An attitude may
Ethical while being immoral, or, on the contrary, moral
Revealing itself to analysis totally antinomic to ethics.

From a historical point of view, and for the subject we are concerned with,
From the start, that the vast majority of thinkers, latently or manifestly,
Tends to agree on this point: the object aimed at by Ethics that identifies with Good
(Or Virtue), no man will be declared in conformity with the concept of
Well (or virtue) if his conduct towards other men consists in their
Inflicting, against their will, various torments, whatever their nature.

If we were to characterize the ethical injunction in what it has

Universal and timeless, one would then be led to state it in this way:

Accomplish all that enchants and fertilizes you

As long as your fellow does not suffer! "

Or according to Chamfort's formulation:

"Enjoy and enjoy without hurting yourself or anyone. "

Or again according to Schopenhauer's:

"
Neminem laede: Do no harm to anyone! "

"Do whatever you like without harming others! ": This is the only ethical maxim
Which is always and everywhere, humanly and pragmatically, valid.

Despite the well-known epistemological limitations (Kant, Wittgenstein,

Popper) that prevent us from conferring to any value the character of
The absolute truth of the transcendent veracity, the operative relevance of this
Of the "Non-Nuire-à-notre-Prochain" could be the subject of a
Convincing demonstration: it would suffice to insist on the imperative of reciprocity
For a behavioral option to be found everywhere and always valid
In the anthropogenic field of action. Knowing that we are always
The Other of the Other, that is to say, to paraphrase Rimbaud, that the Other is a
I, whoever granted himself the right to torture his fellow-man,
Even the right to his fellow man to supplicate him in turn ... Nevertheless,
This discussion on the possibility of founding a rule of conduct
Beyond the scope of this paper, and we
Later.

For our present purpose, let us simply remember that all our civilization,
And not only ours, has methodically built itself upon this precept
As simple as effective the refusal to harm others. This is the
Decalogue mosaic, the heart of evangelical morality, the essence of the concept
Of Ahimsa (absolute non-violence) to which both
Hinduism that the Buddhists and the Jains, it is finally the nucleus of the thought
Confucian under the species of Jen, the Beneficence which commands not
To cause no evil and to "love all men like oneself", as we
There invited the Chinese master six centuries before Christ ... We see, this Principle
Of Non-Nuisance has a fairly wide historical-geographical spread.

Gandhi, Martin Luther King, the promoters of Human Rights,

Anti-slavery, opponents of the death penalty, racism,
Colonialism, militants of the feminist cause, homosexual, socialist,
Pacifist, environmentalist, alterglobalist, etc., in clear all the
Supporters of humanist struggle are supported, explicitly or
Minimal ethical invariant that requires us to abstain from
Our fellow-men against our will, that we preserve them from our
Natural tendencies to aggression and predation, that we
Subordinate it to the realization of our whims or to the satisfaction of our
Needs, that we abdicate the desire to reify it and to
Our profit!

Do not make your fellow suffer: impeccable Wisdom, who therefore

Venture to disapprove it?

But here we have seen that existence and suffering

Tend to identify themselves: this is the irrefutable conclusion to which the superb
Majority of the thinkers, but in addition this clear equation can make
The object of a strict and convincing demonstration (according to the geometric order
Teasing Spinoza), as outlined in Chapter 1.

Structurally, we have established,

More suffering than enjoyment and pain is consubstantial
To the effort to live!
(I see drops of sweat germinate on the forehead of the broodstock, let's continue ...)

From these two theorems:

1. Ethics = not inflicting harm on your neighbor.

2. Be born = be exposed to all prejudices.

We can distill two premises by virtue of which, o nectar, the

Syllogism follows:

● To make others suffer is incompatible with the Ethics.

● But to live means to suffer.
● So giving life is inconsistent with ethics.

CQFD: engendrer fits in with the ethical values

Around which not only the main
Civilizations but especially modern humanism itself!

The challenge then becomes: do we have to give up Ethics or

Procreation?

Let us note it attentively: if we renounce the ethical injunction

Universal as we have identified it, we come to justify the
Nazism and all systems of totalitarian oppression! If it is legitimate
To make another suffer against his will, if virtue belongs to the strongest, then the
Shoah and the extermination of the Amerindians were legitimate and virtuous ...

Do you feel ready to bear the consequences of this antimalal?

Prudence, for if you assert to me that it is permissible to dispose of another as good
Seems to us, you will become the first target of my bellicose ferocity!

Whoever will maintain that it is lawful to torment our fellow man

As long as we find our enjoyment there, I will take it at my word and
He will sink a bottle shard into the gums before introducing him
A hammer in the anus, again, especially if he dies, be it there
To give him a lesson too magnanimous. An Ethics is in short
Never be valid if the person who advocates it as a subject is rather
Become the object.

We fully understand, we can not repudiate the Ethics in

As long as Respect-total-of-the-figure-of-the-other without immediately reopening the doors
Of barbarism and re-initiate the war of all against all. Either ethics
And the totality of its constraints, namely the natural instinct and the totality of its
Atrocities! Either ethics or rape, spoliation and murder at will. I
Pressen that you opt for ethics. You sadden my jackhammer,
But comfort my reasoning.

The issue was clarified: should we renounce Ethics or

Procreation?

We wisely chose not to give up Ethics. Thus, Unless it were to demonstrate, what would come
under the supernatural exploit, that the Life is like a part of pleasure from which suffering is
excluded, we do not Can only renounce the Procreation, under penalty of legitimizing all the
other Acts of barbarism!
- Is it good to make others suffer?
"Certainly not!
"Then why would it be good to have children?"
Birth is suffering,
Death is suffering
And the interval between birth and death
Teeming with inevitable sufferings.

In conclusion, for there to be compatibility between Ethics and

Procreation, it would be necessary that the life which is conferred on a being who has
Obviously not claimed is not a poisoned gift; Because everything
Likewise: what does it mean to live, if not the certainty of suffering much in
The hope of enjoying a little?
 Posture vi
The Right to File Complaint
Against his Parents

Red hair. Give it as an exergue:

"The father and the mother owe everything to the child.
The child owes them nothing. "
- Jules Renard, Journal. France, 19th century

How many children do they know how they can use

Legally ask the law, faced with absurd parents
Or abusing their rights and strength into bad masters?
- Françoise Dolto, The Difficulty of Living. France, 20th century

We have just constructed a somewhat contrary syllogism,

As a reminder :
To make others suffer is incompatible with the Ethics.
But to live means to suffer.
So giving life is inconsistent with ethics.

Of course, I already hear thumping the trumpets of the protest.

Be able to attack this syllogism on its major, some will attack
His minor, oh, the scoundrels, and will try, very sterilely, to support
That life is full of so much ecstasy that it deserves to be traveled, and therefore
To be imposed on a non-existent who would not lose anything to ignore it at
Never doubtful delights.

Is. Let us grant them the "right", notwithstanding the radical indemonstrability
Of the benefits to be born rather than not to be born, to anchor a
Non existent in existence. They are there the bet, oh how perilous, that life
Is a good and the child will be happy to receive the gift. Donation
Including, as it should, the anguish of the death and the agony which precedes it.
No matter, they will retort: everything has its price and live is worth to suffer
So abundant here are the compensations.

Good. Such was their opinion (doxa), and a baby resulted from it. This
The last one begins to grow and gradually discovers that the enchanted world
That its promoters promised to him is found
Disillusionment, and that the expected compensation
Their rarity and their effectiveness. The child does not
A taste for diseases which afflict him with a certain obstinacy, or for
The injuries consequent to his learning of his limits in the face of the hardness
Of the real, nor for the obligation to attend the school bagne during twelve
At twenty, nor for the chronic blackmail between the docile acceptance of
School (its tedious duties, its harassing lessons, the conflicts with the
The anguish of the examinations, the nauseous rage of failure) or the
Risk of poverty, crime and an even more sinister prison,
Etc.

As for the prospect of having to endure for some forty years

The yoke of the trade which makes it possible to "earn" her life, she rejoices
Sting of the scorpion or the bite of the piranha.

In short, endowed with a certain intellectual power and noting that the
Time devoted here below to orgasm is infinitely inferior to the time devoted
To chores and to the exasperating labor, the ex-non-existent regrets more and more
More must have existed and feel more life every day, not as
A caress, but as a most painful prejudice. The doll's doll
Lautréamont said that he had "received life
Like a wound "and, as he likes, is struggling as he can" defend at
Suicide to cure the scar ", unless the terror of death does not
Palpitates at home less intense than the spasms of disgust he experiences
Facing the raft of destiny unfolding before him, as far as the confines of the future,
His putrefied planks, and that he finally sided with the party, embraced each
Year by legions of teenagers, of the suicidal attempt, more or less
Successful, more or less recurrent …

But it is not only suicide to cast the shame on the missed bet
Of parents: there is also anorexia, delinquency, runaway, vandalism,
Drug abuse, violence and all forms of exemplary revolt ...
Of symbolic methods used by the beings-of-force to scream
Not to the existence they have been given!

Prejudice? This word reminds me of something …

Philosophically, everything is allowed, except to prejudice my next. "

So that was it!

Obviously, the spawners missed their bet:
Ignore the teachings of the philateth which, from Lucretius to Schopenhauer,
Had exposed them according to the mathematical firmness of reason how much life
A torture rather than a beatitude, they listened only to
The bestial voice of their desire-need of child and here this child protests
Against the punishment which he did not want!

But who says damage suffered, also says right to seek redress for
The prejudice suffered …

It is therefore a matter of enacting without delay a law authorizing the children,

Considering themselves prejudiced by the fact of having been born, to lodge a complaint
against their executioners: I named those who forced them to be born …

He is going, let us take full conscience, of the solidity of the ethical

Fully structure our civilization! Or we grant the right
The child to bring before the courts the persons responsible for his distress
To the crucifying requirements of all destiny, or we have only to
Open penitentiaries and free criminals who, let us note in passing,
Have yielded to the sirens of evil only by inability to adapt to
Unbearable obligations of the existence that their inept generators
Have selfishly inflicted …

It is not up to parents to decide whether life is worth it or not

To be lived, this judgment of value belongs exclusively to the child!

Once the latter, the sole arbiter of his happiness or not to exist,
Considers to have been seriously abused at birth, it is not clear why
Denied what is granted to all victims of maltreatment.
Legal capacity to incriminate its torturers …

If you give yourself the anti-philosophical right to put a child

In the world, you can only give this child the right
Philosophy of filing a complaint against its parents!

We can not resist the temptation to quote Article 3 of the

"International Convention on the Rights of the Child" developed by UNICEF
In 1989 and ratified by almost all the States of the planet (with the exception of
Of the USA, as it should ...):
"In all decisions affecting children, [...]
Of the child must be a primary consideration. "

Clearly, if the best interests of the child are to be taken into account
In all the decisions which concern him, it is therefore a question of not giving him
life ! Nothing more opposed to his well-being than to have to be born …

The first articles of any Charter to protect the interests of

The Child should therefore look like this:

1. The first right of the child is not to be born.

2. The second right of the child is to be able to call before the

Courts, if he deemed it necessary, those who seriously
His first right.

In any case, we can hope that such legal provisions

Strongly encourage parents to acquire maturity and
Sufficient skills to provide a child with the ultimate in happiness
He deserves!

It can be assumed that few children would make use of such a right,
The scope of which would ultimately be more symbolic than practical,
That future breeders will know that if they do not
Resides in their means to guarantee their offspring a pleasant existence
Satisfactory, the latter will have the legal means to claim
accounts !

Vote such a law and you will suddenly see the parents multiply
Responsible, loving, dedicated, qualified, attentive and tolerant, while
Will evaporate just as quickly the countless scoundrels who treat their
Offspring like toys or jumpers!

The scandal of the woman-object has been strongly denounced, with pertinence,
But why nobody denounces with even more force the
Scandal of child-object?

At present, all the specialists admit it, the waste is enormous:

It is by hundreds of millions that the children are violated, beaten, beaten,
Neglected, oppressed, hungry, exploited, ill-educated, unloved, despised and
Desperation or permanent existential disability, even tortured
Dead by their own parents! Yes, sometimes even tortured to death, as
Every day the newspapers attest! What do you plan to do, herds of
Pharisees, to remedy such a silent holocaust? Subsidizing without
Restriction the birth rate? Fools. Jocrisses. Slavers.

Do you think that the nascent generations will remain for a long time
The figures revealing to them day after day the magnitude of the
Misery of the world?

Reassure us of some lugubrious statistics by keeping

That a third of the world's population is under the age of 15, or that
To say otherwise, that more than 2 billion human beings are children:
§ 1.2 billion people "live" (the verb seems dared) with less than 1 dollar
Per day, and another 1.6 billion with less than 2 dollars! This gives us
A number terrorizing children plunged into the most abysmal poverty: more
Of a billion obviously!

§ Consequence of this misery crushing half of humanity: 1 billion

Of people living in slums, slums or buildings
Insalubrious, which, as it should be, an enormous proportion of juvenile souls,
Since the most destitute are also the most fertile …

§ Another consequence: As you read these lines, 40 million

People suffer from acute hunger, 800 million others are struck by
Chronic under-nourishment while another 2 billion suffer
Malnutrition. In total, there are as many as 9 to 15 million people,
According to the vintages, who die of hunger or the consequences of hunger
Every year! 15 million: the equivalent of a World War ...

§ As for children alone, 170 million of them suffer from under-nourishment

And 3.4 million die annually!

§ Over the same period, more than 11 million children under five
Years of preventable diseases, ie due to a lack of vaccines,
Care and appropriate medication ...

§ Malaria, which permanently infects a hundred million

Of individuals, is responsible, each year, for the death of nearly two million
of them.
§ Every year, tuberculosis martensed 60 million people and
Generates no less than 2 million deaths.

§ Hepatitis C affects 170 million people, 20% of whom,

34 million individuals, will develop cirrhosis or cancer of the
liver.

§ His sister, hepatitis B, afflicts 350 million other victims,

Chronically infected, similarly threatened with destruction of the liver.
Decidedly, tinkering with deadly viruses and supplicating bacteria seems
The favorite hobby of God ...

§ Diarrheal diseases exterminate 2.2 million people

Human creatures, including a majority of children, between two New Years! Not
Enough to deflow a bottle of champagne ...

§ 200 million people suffer from schistosomiasis, a serious disease

parasitic.

§ Trachoma has already caused the blindness of 6 million people and threatens
Of eye damage 500 million humans!

§ There are 10 million new cases of cancer per year. Your child
Will have more than one chance in four to contract one: thank you for it.

§ Since its emergence, AIDS has decimated some 30 million people

(Of which more than 4 million had not reached their fifteenth year ...)
While 40 million more are currently infected, including several
Million children!

§ As the epidemic worsens, 15 million children

Are already orphaned by their father and / or mother through HIV.
They will be 25 million by 2010 ... Do you plan to moderate the
Disaster?

§ Among these children affected by AIDS, some have even had the privilege of
To be born with the virus or to contract it via the poisonous milk of their
Inconsistent genitourist ... Each year, 600 000 babies are infected with
This way: palsambleu, how good it is to receive life!
§ Nevertheless, ideas of suicide haunt at one time or another a
Teenagers out of three, and one in ten ends up taking action! Who would dare
Still pretend that existence is a part of pleasure?

§ All psychologists will confirm this: the aggressiveness testifies to a

pain. Luckily for the optimist, our globe has quite a
Aggressive people. Statistics unavailable.

§ At least 20 million individuals are subject to one form or another

Of slavery in the strict sense of the term: a painful forced labor for
Remunerative remuneration.

§ "A total of 1,200,000 children worldwide are sold for work or

Prostitute ", proclaims a campaign organized by UNICEF in 2003 against
Trafficking in children ...

§ 200 million Earthlings relish the misfortune of being diabetic; they will be
Probably 330 million in 2025. Well-known consequences: accidents
Cardio-vascular, stroke, retinal, kidney or
Nerves ... Annual ransom: 4 million deaths. President's comments
Of the International Diabetes Federation: "All the figures show that
We are heading towards one of the biggest disasters the world has
Never known ". Will your child be a witness or an actor?

§ Our globe has tens of millions of drug addicts, including

More than 22 million heroin addicts and cocaine addicts.
30 million people abusing amphetamines. As for alcoholics,
Who could establish the number? Observers speak of 2 to 5% of
The adult human population, that is to say 80 to 200 million people,
Excessively haunted by alcohol ... Add to it the ingesters of tobacco,
Haschisch, LSD, opium, morphine, mescaline, antidepressants,
Of barbiturates and other benzodiazepines, it is immediately in abundance
Hundreds of millions of pharmaco-dependent
Family! If life was so charming, one might suppose that one should be impregnated
Less psychotropic to make it livable ...

§ More than one in 100 people is schizophrenic, ie about 90 million

Of people in the world!
§ Altogether, on our happy planet, 450 million people are suffering
Neuropsychiatric disorders.

§ Better: 25% of individuals are condemned to develop, on one or

The other period of their exalting destiny, psychological
behavioral. It should be noted that the family environment plays a
Major in the appearance of these psychopathologies ...

§ So no less than 10% of children suffer, one day or another,

Mental illnesses severe enough to require specific treatment!
Adequate therapy that barely 20% of them actually receive ...

§ According to the UN, because of the various wars, only between 1980 and 1995,
Millions of children have died, five million have become disabled
(Blessed are the anti-personnel mines, machine guns and shells that our
Taxes are used to finance), one million have become
Orphans of father and mother, twelve million finally suffered a trauma
Psychological.

§ All 365 nycthémères, the death of 5 million children is linked

To unhealthy environments. Knowing that pollution is constantly
increase ...

§ As a child, 130 million women have been tortured

In the form of genital mutilation (excision of the clitoris, removal of the lips,
Infibulation, etc.). Among boys, it is by hundreds of millions that
Count the victims of circumcision and other sexual abuse as a pretext
religious.

§ It is estimated that between fifty and one hundred million children live
in the street. Yes, without a roof worthy of the name, these legions of children grow,
Work and turn off in the street! Sometimes from the age of four! Delivered to
Delinquency, begging, drug addiction, petty degrading trades,
Prostitution before being slaughtered by a rival
"Death squads" set up by adults concerned about their comfort
Inside ... Why not adopt or sponsor these damned of the earth? Of
Obviously their generators do not have the means to provide for their
The most basic requirements ...

§ As proof: 250 million children under the age of 14 are

Mostly to meet the needs of their
Irresponsible family! Deprived of any decent education, one can guess what future
Radiant opens before their pink fronts.

§ Nevertheless, their fate seems enviable compared to that of the 300,000 children
Forced and forced to serve as soldiers (or to put it more precisely:
Like cannon fodder) in conflicts of which they do not cure. At eight, ten or
Twelve years of age, climbing to the front machine-gun at the shoulder: a world so hideous
Deserves to be offered new babies?

§ Yes, hideous: at this time, several million children are sexually

Exploited or forced into prostitution, some of which are sold to
Traffickers and pornographers by their own parents! Genuine toys
Many of them have died as a result of the repeated rape and
Respectable adults, others are sinking into drugs, others
Receive a sip of HIV as a tip ...

Millefoutredieu,
Beside what Childhood endures throughout the world,
The Shoah almost looks like
To suburban crime!

An Indian myth tells that the head of Avalokiteshvara, endowed with omniscience,
Exploded with pain when he saw from the heavens the vastness of misery
Of men: how to better metaphor the unsustainable nature of
Destinies inflicted on creatures?
The ultimate consequence of this universal distress: every minute,
Two human creatures disgusted with life imposed on them are offered the
Suicide Relief, while every three seconds, somewhere on the
Our planet of torture, an individual courageously tries to end
His days.

In other words, during the half hour of an average coitus, about sixty
Of human beings have killed themselves and more than half a thousand sought
To get rid of their corporality! This is what makes your sexual
Little more tasty.

In suicide, it goes without saying, despite the law of silence surrounding their
Act (do not depress the families that devil), that even the tender ones
Children are not absent from this eloquent application to the Nether …
At the meditation of the above quantified facts, this burden of suffering
That the younger generations bear or are witnessing,
Better this sentence of Arthur Janov in his famous Primal Cry:

Whatever the situation of a man in life, his system

Of defenses is either crude or very elaborate, if one scratches a little under the
Surface, we find a bruised child.

Yes, it is time to be able to incriminate those who plunge us into

The disaster of existence: to procreate, is this not to inflict death and torment? In
Would the spawners deserve less sanctions than homicides or
The torturers?

Otherwise, because the magistrates themselves, and lawyers, and lawyers, and
The politicians, and the pseudo-moralists, wish to offer themselves the "joys that are dispensed
The birth of a child "and enjoy for many years the stimulus
Presence of this one ... Pedophiles?

Young people with red sex of insurrection,

do not hesitate :
If the chore of existence displeases you,
Rather than commit suicide,
Lodge an appeal
Against your parents!

Posture vii
Surpollupopulation

Humanity is actually taken to the throat

By increasing its membership.
- Albert Jacquard, The Demographic Explosion.
France, 20th century

I wonder if we can refuse to inherit the Earth.

"I believe that once it is born, it is too late."
- Bill Watterson, Calvin & Hobbes (volume XI).
 United States, 20th century.

There would be ample reasons to sue the

Procreation is no longer merely a crime against the child, but
Is also a crime against humanity!

Indeed, today we know that two elephantine threats are crushing

Of all their weight the XXIst
Century: this is the Overpopulation and
Its immediate corollary: Pollution, here understood as destruction
Of the biotope, whether it is contamination or the eradication of pure and
this one.

These two perils, Pollution and Overpopulation, in the last analysis

Constitute only one so much that we can evoke them under the term
Of Surpollupopulation, pollution being only the direct consequence of
Of the excess of population! Thesis which is easily illustrated: 10 million
People living according to Western material abundance criteria
Could pollute almost at will without ever putting our globe in peril;
On the other hand, 100 billion people are satisfied with the
Would still lead to ecological bankruptcy!

The concept of Surpollupopulation focuses on

Incontestable phenomenon: the real ecological problem is in no way
Pollution, but the number of people who pollute! Insists too little
On this biomathematical truth; And for good reason: the so-called "right" to
Reproduction seems an untouchable subject …

And yet, the specialists now admit it unanimously, the planet

Is slowly dying under the weight of widespread pollution
Which human beings carry to him.

At the current rate of destruction of the environment, within

Century, it may be that the very possibility of life, at least of a complex life
As expressed in the human person, has disappeared. More an expert
Which does not advance to prognosticate a series of major cataclysms in a
More distant future if our species does not drastically reduce the
Pressure which it causes, by its only number, on the biosphere.

Yes: by its only number.

Even a Third World resident, whose lifestyle does not
Yet not to put, as in the West, a deleterious Leviathan industrial
In its service, represents an immediate threat to the health of the globe; this
Inhabitant of the frugal exigencies knows no less incompressible
Food and energy requirements that require it to be practiced, among others
Prejudices, deforestation always more voracious in order to satisfy them.

Everywhere on Earth, more and more trees are being annihilated

To provide firewood or construction, as well as to
Allow an increase in grazing or release new arable land
Whose biological richness is practically nil, only the cultivated plant having
Principle of the city …

When it is also known that the ultimate aspirations of most

Of the Third World countries, their accession to the WTO is sufficient evidence,
To align themselves with the standard of living in the West, it is easy to guess
What catastrophe is looming in the coming decades!

It should be noted that already China and India, whose inhabitants represent
More than a third of the total human population, are engaged in
The process of industrialization and conversion to capitalism in full swing ...

Thus, not only, and all psychosociologists know, the Occidental

Will not backtrack, will not abandon its rage to produce
To accumulate material goods, but a growing mass of nations,
Confessed for the time being, and significantly, in the process of "development"
Legions of "clients" whose bulimia will soon
Engulf the remaining natural spaces and to
Ultimate planetary resources.

Every year already, all causes combined, on a global scale, is

Nearly 1% of the capital in soil that is lost irreversibly.
Every year already, thousands of animals and plants
Disappear under anthropogenic pressure!
Every year already, millions of hectares
Collapse to meet the needs of human populations …

To take the right measure of the apocalypse that incubates, one would have to
The acceleration of desertification due to overgrazing
To the cultivation of easily erodible surfaces (overpollupopulation
Always: the more you want to feed people, the more you have to overexploit the ultimate
Available land, until exhausted); Thus it is found
That from now on, from year to year, the area of land newly
Conquered (to the detriment of forest vegetation ...) for exploitation
Agricultural land remains lower than that of the permanently lost arable land!

In the same way, the worrying pollution of soils and aquifers

Resulting from intensive farming as well as massive contamination
Rivers and oceans by domestic and industrial effluents; the
Dangerous drying up of global phreatic reserves; inexorable
Accumulation of toxic waste (nuclear or chemical)
Unexploitable portions of the ecumene; The obstinate extension
Megacities and concrete surfaces; The dramatic ravages caused to
Rare areas that the chainsaw saves by acid rain or
Fires (both accidental and criminal); The need, under penalty of
Immediate famine, increased use of fertilizers and pesticides
(Which annually poison millions of people and sterilize
Whole ecosystems); The constant increase in the atmospheric
Methane, the main cause of the greenhouse effect after carbon dioxide,
Methane mainly released from rice fields and intestines of livestock
Ceases to be present in order to provide for the trophic needs
Of the human mammal; Impoverishment of fish stocks
Overfishing (catches already capped, it is useless to wait for oceans
They feed more people ...), etc. Litany of perils in gesine.

We send the impatient to discover in detail the most

Imminent to specialized ecological works: they are edifying! It would be
To prescribe the reading to all adolescents as well as to all the parents
Potential.

We see, this brief enumeration of terrifying processes already in progress

- and all proceeding directly, from the Surpollupopulation - would justify to it
Alone, from to-day, without losing an extra minute,
By coercion if necessary, human fecundity!

All the copiously synapsed brains exhaust themselves to the clamor: the earth
Is supersaturated with human beings.
Our humanity [...] is threatened not only by the
Hydrogen, but even more so by the avalanche
 Of the population.
The living and habitable space of mankind is being reduced more and more
And, for many peoples, the optimum has been surpassed since
long time. The danger of disasters increases proportionately
To the density of the growing populations.
C.G. Jung, A Modern Myth. Switzerland, 20th
century.

[The Swiss psychoanalyst made these remarks in the late 1950s when
The Earth had barely 3 billion inhabitants.

The demographic explosion transforms man into a

And prepares future wars.

Tensions and frustrations caused by uncontrolled demographics

The "absolute" wars of the future ... Too many in
A bag of flour, the weevils devour each other.

No solution is viable until the

The question of demography.
- Marguerite Yourcenar, The Open Eyes.
France, 20th century

Antinatal practices are inescapable.

Countries with a high birth rate are also the poorest. Poverty,
Ignorance and prolificity are in solidarity.
Prevention of births, a matter of primary importance,

Presents strange contrasts. Vital for humanity, [...] it is not

Not studied with the attention it deserves.

The human species finds itself before an exuberance that it has an interest
To be limited.
- Alfred Sauvy, Prevention of Births.
France, 20th century
 The amount of freshwater and arable land available per inhabitant
Fall to levels that resource experts consider
Unanimously as dangerous.

The human population has reached the tolerance threshold of the Earth
Around 1978. In 2000, it was 1.4 times this threshold.
- Edward Wilson, The Future of Life. United States, XXI
century.

Is it possible to hold more unambiguous speeches?

Can they be more credible than when they emanate from one of the most
Powerful geniuses of the twentieth century, one of the most brilliant women
Of all time, a demographer among the most seasoned, or a
Of the most famous living biologists, having devoted half a century to the study
Of nature?

Know, your child will be by its very presence a major pollutant of

The environment: every individual produced in our societies
About 2 kgs of household waste per day, which leads us to a total
Of 50 tons over an average life of 70 years. To domestic waste,
Agricultural and industrial wastes, which multiply by
At least four the debris produced by a Westerner. Yes: every child
That you bring into the world, it is a minimum of 200 tons of waste
You are engendering and overwhelming our planet
Moribund!

Impossible in the face of the tragedy that is looming not to evoke the
Prophetic thrusts launched by Bergson, as early as 1932, in The Two Sources of Morality
And of Religion:

Could we not ... in countries where the population abounds,

To impose more or less heavy taxes on the child in excess?

Not only can we, but we must! An imposing tax on

Procreation seems the most immediately effective way to curb this
An impulse more diabolical than ever: in view of the superlative egoism of parents
And their sickly blindness, it would be illusory to hope that a simple appeal
Reason and benevolence could dissuade them from offering themselves the baby-trinket of
which They dream and continue to overpopulate our planet quietly
dying. Ethics, the concern for the Other, we have stressed
Are hardly their strongest …

However, the urgency of action is growing ever more glaring. According to

The rise of the oceans as well as the increase in the
Flooding caused by global warming, which
Attributable to the Surpollupopulation which we have refused for more than a century
Will lead to large population displacements,
Can doubt that they will unfold peacefully! Needless to recall
That the human animal has very little sense of welcoming foreigners migrating
And even less that of the division of its territory: one knows from experience
How the Palestinians reacted to the much-needed creation of
The State of Israel …

Where, for example, the tens of millions of inhabitants would be relocated

Of the Bangladesh Delta, which is known to be one of the first
Submerged lands? In India ? Sorry: the Indian subcontinent is already
More than overpollupled …

It is all the more possible to imagine the magnitude of these migrations

When it is recalled that the coastal strips are among the
Heavily populated areas of the planet and that
Ice would melt, the sea level would rise by about 70
Meters ... The "Netherlands" has not finished investing in dikes.

As for the innumerable low-lying islands enamelling the oceans,

There is no doubt that they will all be under water - as well as their
If they were to fail to find a courtesy land of welcome - by the
Half or the end of the current century.

It should also be noted that the climate change

The first effects are already felt, whether it will multiply storms on the one hand,
Cyclones, floods and exceptional tides, will
Desertification of gigantic territories subjected to unprecedented droughts,
Which will also give rise to disturbing migratory flows …

In the same vein, the amplification of the hole in

The ozone layer, this shield that protects us less and less well from
Cosmic radiations, renders it as unbreakable as it is unworkable
Certain latitudes such as those of South Australia, New Zealand,
Patagonia, Scandinavia, Iceland, Alaska,
Siberia and Canada, and forced their residents to leave
These areas became hostile. It is in any case certain that the
Number of malignant melanomas (unnecessary to insist on the lethality of these cancers
Of the skin) will be increasing since the ozone layer is already thinner by 6%
By decade (and since the late 1970s) over so many countries
Populated than Europe or the United States: yes, "our" territories themselves
Will be less and less conducive to sedentarization!

Finally, the galloping need to build dams of Pharaonic scale

To ensure the supply of water and energy to humanity
In addition to the destruction of arable land,
Imposed population exodus: it has been estimated that since the
In 1950, no less than 60 million people were forced to leave their homes.
Lands to be submerged by the construction of dams. And this
Movement will only increase, as the current draft
Chinese water reservoir on the Yangtze River: the Three Gorges Dam
- after drowning an area equal to almost twice Belgium and
Tens of cities - will create a lake, larger than the Baikal, of six
Hundreds of kilometers in length and will require the deportation of more than one
Million people!

In short, O pincers,
Humanity continues to grow
While the areas
Arable, exploitable or habitable
Do not stop decreasing!

Better yet, prospectivists certify that within twenty

Years of clashes for drinking water will break out as
It exploded for oil.

As of now, more than one billion people have no water

And 5 million die annually due to the poor quality of the liquid
They consume, yes 5 million, half of them children! And this number
Will double by 2025 …

Irrespective of the scarcity of water and the enormous famines

Overcrowding will lead to inevitable wars.
At any time, and the most serious demographers have been able to support the
That one of the primary functions of an armed conflict was to regulate
Population in order to bring them back to proportions compatible with the
Territory.

It is, moreover, surprising that no observer or philosopher

To point out that one of the essential roots of the eternal
Israeli-Palestinian belligerencies was demographic. When
Two fertility peoples live on a land of small extent while refusing to
To control their fertility, the bloody confrontation is inescapable; Peace
Between Israel and Palestine without a bilateral renunciation of the
population growth ! Another truth that the newspapers refrain
Carefully to pass on, for fear of shocking the readership …

Let us therefore give the floor to Henri Bergson, still in Les deux Sources
Of Morality and of Religion:

What is certain is that Europe is overpopulated, that the world

Will be soon, and that if we do not "rationalize" the production of
The man himself as one begins to do for his work,
We will have war. Nowhere is it safe to rely on
To instinct. Ancient mythology had understood this when she
Associated the goddess of love with the god of fighting. Let Venus,
It will bring you Mars. You will not avoid regulation.

Remember, this text was published in 1932 ... More than 70 years ago
That we despise these wise recommendations. Needless to reproach the
Philosophers their uselessness if every time they think usefully,
Behaves as if they had not thought of anything!

In total, throughout the 20th century

Century, the best minds will have ceased
To alert the crowds to the threat posed by population
Reasoned, or controlled by an interventionist policy. For their own
Damnation, the crowds did not want to know: they wanted children …

Let. We are already already more than 6 billion on our

world ; And we will be, if by then ethics does not take precedence over the indecent
Desire for a child, 10 or 12 billion people in 2050. However,
By the superlative majority of experts, 12 billion
The extreme maximum that our planet can tolerate (which does not mean
In the luxuriance), while the same experts
Only one billion people, already living
Western standards of comfort, far exceed the
Natural regeneration of the biotope: this means that we exhaust
Resources infinitely faster than they are renewed
The non-renewable resources ...) and that at the current rate this
Billion consumers will have transformed into a more
Closer to the planet in ecological wasteland!

If we wish to translate these data in sharp terms, they mean

Neither more nor less than we are already too! Too much.

If proof were needed, it is this: of the current six billion of earthlings,

Half of which, as we have seen, is living in the most sordid poverty (
As little pressure as possible on the biosphere), the largest
Part of the other half has still not found his satiated wealth,
And yet our planet is already wasting away at an exponential rate! And one
Would make us believe that it can tolerate 12 billion creatures
Human resources? Yes, 12 billion unfortunates squeezing their belts, converts
Force to vegetarianism, resigned to an existence of compressed urbanites and
Depriving of any excess of vital expansiveness: destiny of cattle parque.

I would prefer to know the land populated by a maximum of one hundred

Millions of individuals to whom no abundance would fail, nor food
Material or spiritual food (forests deceased or requisitioned for
Essential, will nations come to limit the number of books
Allowed by person?), Neither free to explore nor vast and extensive virgins
Lonely meditation, nor the joy of contemplating the prodigality of
Fauna and flora, nor even the right to orgiastic squanderings, for it is not
Good that man be shrunk to imperative accounting glaciers ... Live
As the demographers invite us to make room for
Five, six or seven billion new wretches, also condemned to
Diet, is it really a prospect for the future?

Certainly: a hundred million human creatures

Libertarian opulence that ten billion miserable calculators
Always busy to measure the space and the dose of pips to snack! he
Time to begin to prefer a living humanity in the
Quality for all to a humanity exhausting in the race to the single quantity
Of its workforce. Why multiply the number of needy? Would we
More unhappy if we were 60 times less numerous? Will we be more
Happy when we will be 2 times more teeming? Before thinking of
Increase their number, first ensure the happiness of all humans!

In any case, with the aim of "saving the planet" (sic), speaking, as
One is content to do it today, in a rhetoric so vain
Hypothetical, to "change our consumer habits" (which we
In any case, by no means) will in no way alter the fundamental
Of the problem: the unstoppable increase in population pressure on
the environment.

It would be idle to try to determine how many billions of individuals,

And according to what lifestyle (technician or traditional), the Earth can endure
Without wasting too much, it is enough to remember that the Earth is a finite space and that
This title it can not accommodate an infinite number of human creatures! Gold,
The more we wait to impose on the whole planet the policy of the child
Unique, only able to tangibly decrease the population, the
Will have to frustrate a large number of couples from their simian instinct
To reproduce.
One day, therefore, we will have to limit births if we
Claim to survive. Why do not you start right away?
Planet already protests furiously and that no one, neither the West nor the Third World,
Seems to want to renounce its inadequate, predatory relationship to
its environment ?

Will we have to wait until we have transformed the Earth into an ecological desert
To subordinate the reproductive drive to the ethical imperative?

Albert Jacquard himself did not stop hammering him during the 90s,
Thus in his Little Philosophy for the Use of Non-Philosophers:

To find a balance, the only possibility is to limit the

Fertility, which implies a fundamental change in our
Attitude towards procreation. Procreer was once a duty;
It is now a limited right.

The question remains as to who is going to impose the

This "right" is constantly more questionable …

No politician for the moment has the courage to hold a hostile speech
Fertility: and for good reason, it would be dangerously opposing the selfishness of
As for the "beautiful souls", they never dare to use the
Terms of coercion or legal constraint, nor economic sanctions
To check the matrices, fearing no doubt to tarnish their angelic image
Philanthropists and at the same time slimming their complacency
Mattress of readers. One day, however, it will be necessary to leave logorrhea
Sweetener to switch to efficient acts.

How is it that no one draws conclusions from these

The current Dalai Lama, Tenzin Gyatzo:

We must be clear, without hypocrisy, without bias. It is necessary

Six billion inhabitants is too much. Morally, it is a
Serious mistake, because of the aggravated distortion between rich and
poor countries. And, practically, it's dramatic.

At the root of all our dangers, of all threats that we

Let's talk, before the money, I put overpopulation.
"So you're in control of births?"
- Absolutely. It must be made known and promoted [...]
As soon as possible.

It is therefore necessary to educate the populations of the Third World. Because they
Do not know anything, I see here around me. And it must be done
Energetically, without sentimental reluctance. It is a necessity
Immediate, an emergency. You have to tell them, with all that
Supposes misunderstandings: you are wrong, your growth
Demographics far too strong leads you to more
Terrible yet.

(Excerpts from The Force of Buddhism.)

Long before these flawless sentences, Albert Einstein himself

Had warned: the demographic bomb equals in dangerousness the bomb
Atomic! Alas, this matrix bomb, the first imbecile to come
Decide to activate the detonator: an ejaculation is enough …

It is regrettable that no State concerned about the peace of nations

Want to take the trouble to curb the proliferation of this Weapon of Destruction
Massive of a new type: Maternity!
Yet the 2002 report of the United Nations Population Fund
(UNFPA) recognizes the absolute need to reduce fertility in the
Third World, at least if it is desired to allow it to take off economically
And avoid, on the other hand, socio-political conflicts attributable to
Demographics.

But how to act? Nothing more distilled. If we really want to

To bring about the necessary birth control project, the first
Obviously to eliminate the
(This sort of incomprehensible premium for crime); the second,
As already suggested by Bergson, to levy a very heavy tax on each
New baby; The third to stigmatize all the fertility reflexes by
Through active propaganda in favor of sterility; The fourth of
Prohibit any form of medically assisted procreation (the most insane
Of all medical gestures); The fifth, and most importantly, to
To launch a policy of education and systematic awareness-raising
Younger generations: the taste for nulliparity can be taught in the same way
That of non-violence and respect for others.

A child becomes what one does: why not imagine a

Indoctrination to the refusal to procreate as intense and hammering as the
To the family or capitalist values of which we pervert
Today, without shame, the malleable brain of youth?

Every culture manipulates its heirs in the sense that benefits it, why
Not resign ourselves to manipulating ours in the direction of a Better? Certainly,
"Manipulate" is, after "procreate", one of the most abject verbs of the language
French, but do we still have time to choose our means?

We have indicated that if we allow the free will of the greatest

Number, the doxa, this eternal fellator of instinct, will always win
And nothing will come to block the destruction of the globe by countless
Small pregnant globes …

It is not too late, however, to teach young people to philosophize

Without mask or conjuring. Adolescence, all its wealth resides there,
Often prefers the truths that disturb the blindness that reassures ...
Inertia being a vice of adults, it is not impossible that the anti-natalism
Become the theme of crystallization of the adolescent revolt of tomorrow!

In any case, it goes without saying that it is for the West to take
The initiative of these steps and to set an example for the Third World:
Holders of all legal, educational, financial and other
Contraceptives, we must initiate the process of contraction
Demographic!

"Yes, but sir, if the birth rate settles, who will phynanate our pensions?"
Question the Ubu fathers by massaging their green candle.
- I remind you: the child is not a banknote! It does not have to be born
To quilt the decubitus of your lapse: finance your own future or
Well resign yourself, navels, to the idea that you are mortal.

So let us not be afraid of the birth rate: we have a

Gigantic debt to the Third World that, unscrupulously and
Centuries, we plundered, plundered and enslaved both physical
Than economical, as in our own days; It is time to help relieve
Its misery by favoring immigration to our lands of superabundance. Born
Fear no labor shortages if no more children are born
Billions of people knock on our doorstep, including
A titanic number of orphans to adopt! Do you feel reassured,
Tartuffes?

To convey this chapter to its estuary, let us retain the elements

The following:

1. It is unthinkable to tackle Pollution without first fighting against

Overcrowding.

2. Surpollupopulation doing, every child that is born is a bit of land

who dies !

3. Consequently, and in a succulent paradox, the fertilists work

Now to destroy life in the name of life itself! We knew they were idiots, but
At this point…

4. In short, the 21st Century will be anti-natalist or will not be: the hour of glory of
Malthus has resolutely sounded.
5. Bergson, as early as the 1930s, had given us the key to the struggle against
"You will not avoid regulation. "Since we do not
Will not we avoid it, why do we procrastinate more?

Finally, let us point out to our friends the admirable green activists
Champions of ethics, than on a planet whose health is
The irrationality of its inhabitants, an ecologist who breeds is a
Ecologist doubtful …

As a reminder, the famous Commandant Cousteau advocated, with a view to

Saving the Earth, an optimal number of 800 million human beings:
Seven times less than now! At work the IUDs! Around the
Vasectomies!

The panic measures now seem to be

The American environmentalist Edward Wilson already cited, the situation is
Not only dramatic, it is desperate to the extent that, as he
Stresses so well, humanity finds itself engaged in a bottleneck of overpopulation
And uncontrolled consumption; Hence this formidable confession in its enlightenment
The Future of Life: "Too many people consume too much land and
And the resources contained in that space "and to blame without restraint
"Our reproducing madness" (sic), before warning, in an interview given in
August 2002 to the newspaper Le Soir, that we are now facing
To a global environmental crisis that will transform the
World from which our unfortunate descendants will inherit "a place where life
Will be much more difficult "than today! Even more difficult ? Bugger.

In short, it becomes clear that the state of radical decay of the planet
And the many cataclysms announced that will result in all
Decades invalidate the intention of giving life to
New human being, both collectively and individually:

We do not people any more

A planet already overpolluted!

One does not give birth to a child

Which has all the chances
To witness the apocalypse!
 An Agathogenesis

Parents, more often than not,

Have more need of education than children.
- Søren Kierkegaard, Journal.
Denmark, 19th century

What child is crying

On his parents would have motive?
- Friedrich Nietzsche, Thus spoke Zarathustra.
Germany, 19th century

Sail of Isis raised, the procreation appeared to us, in its prodigious

Horror, as the refuge of the most miasmatic human vices; But
We are more likely to delude ourselves on those who condemn us to
Live, it is possible that, immediately, by ricochet, a new mission is incumbent on us:
Teach the multitudes to procreate according to the Wisdom and not according to the Instinct!

The ideal would of course be that philosophy wins the verb and
That all with joy refrain from bequeathing the infection to exist to recalcitrants
heirs. The collective psyche, alas, has not yet reached the nodal point of
Lucidity and ethical demand for this abstinence to be imposed without
Of animal reticence.

Anti-natalism has in its possession the best syllogisms in its quiver,

The human species remains infinitely more sensitive to programming
Genetics from our simian ancestors to the teachings of reason
Apollonian. Without a doubt, the so-called Sapiens Homo primate will continue
To reproduce until a nuclear war or a concatenation
Ecological collapse succeed where wisdom had to bow: to him in
The choice of the extinction which he prefers; Especially since if he does not kill himself,
It will be the laws of cosmology that will take care of it …

Unfortunately, our species could survive an atomic disaster or

While the self-destruction of the Universe is still
Several billion years before us, which nevertheless gives
Criminals to shape a significant number of new
Victims ... Can we not, however,
their fate ? It seems as if, and so will the finality of Agathogenism.

To distinguish well from eugenics to such pernicious connotations,

Agathogenism can very simply be defined as a search for the
"Procreation according to the Good" as well as conditions guaranteeing the child the
Higher probability of falling into the hands of acceptable parents,
The realistic expression of Bettelheim.

Unlike eugenics, Agathogenism does not select genes,

He carves and decans souls in order to make them as fit as possible
The hard task of engendering children and initiating them with the
Authentic Love with multiple challenges of existence.

All you have to do is open the newspapers or browse the

The extent and gravity of parental incompetence: children
Beaten, raped, neglected, tyrannized, ill-educated, ill-loved, abused or
Traumatized by their breeders seem infinitely more numerous
Than children fully fulfilled within their family.

We have already mentioned this, even in our famous western countries

Over-attentive to the well-being of juvenile creatures, one in ten
At least one sexual abuse during his childhood, his own parents by being
In the superlative majority of cases direct officials ....

Every year, in France alone, according to the most reliable estimates,

100,000 children are subjected to various forms of abuse, sometimes
More than 700 of them die directly, while many others
Will respond later to this indelible aggression sometimes by attempting to commit suicide,
Sometimes developing mental disorders, asocial behaviors or behaviors
Violent (including sometimes with their offspring of consolation) …

In the case of the United States, experts even put forward the figure
Emetics of 1700 000 children abused or neglected by their progenitors!
The Holocaust !

In millions of households of all social, economic and

Every day, a terrible crime is committed: violence
To children.
Susan Forward, Toxic Parents. United States, 20th century.
Myriads of children around the world have to deal with
Alcoholics, or addicts, or maladjusted, or mentally deficient,
Or delinquent, or incestuous, or neurotic, or depressed, or frustrated, or
Suicidal, or struggling in the most sinister indigence, or ignorant, or
Boring, or complexed, or suffering from serious pathologies, or simply
Crapulous, etc.

Who could account for the more or less immature breeders?

Despite himself, a child must be satisfied with a single-parent family;

Another was "given birth under X" (from birth, abandoned
Solitary pain to live!); Such was inoculated the smiling AIDS virus by
His mother was distractedly HIV-positive; Such was born of unknown father; Such is
A mother, or even a grandmother, a carrier; The consequences of the
Had a female genitourist who was addicted to smoking during her pregnancy; This will be the
Of a kidnapping by one or other of his parents; Such feels terrified by a father
Despotic or castrating mother; Experience of another type
Of psychological violence (possessiveness, omnipresence, suramour, incest
Symbolic ...); Parents who do not care about their academic performance and
His existential worries; Another was born only to meet the needs
Economic or emotional affairs of his or her family; Such was born unwanted (a crown!);
Such is found forced to overwork and deprived of childhood by the multiple activities
Extra-curricular activities that his parents have imposed on him "to secure his future" (
To disfigure its present); Such is waiting for its designer to come out of prison; Such a
For a 15-year-old adolescent girl more or less illiterate; Such sees
His father beating his mother or mother deceive his father; Such is torn apart
Between divorced or perpetually quarreling procreators, and so on.

Who could account for children more or less unhappy?

In short, if children suffer,

It is first because their own parents make them suffer!

To the phosphorescence of these findings, one can not tolerate any

Prophylactic measure is taken by the public authorities in order to prevent
That so many disasters strike so many child victims of so dismal
Façonnateurs.

Today, bottomless scandal, the most imbecile as the most toxic

Of individuals enjoys the absolute right to make a new creature! Worst :
Societal values, in their defensive apology of the family jail, the
Encourage and condition it without nuances!

While all psychoanalysts, pediatricians and psycho-pedagogues admit

That it is no more difficult task, more complex, and above all more essential,
That of raising a child, the last of the morons can be tried, without having
Followed by the least training, to found a tribe …

Hence our suspicion: if humanity goes so badly,

It is primarily because we leave anyone
Reproduce no matter how!

Even more paradoxical, young people are denied the right to vote
Pretext that they do not have the maturity required to elect such a puppet
Another, but full licenses are granted to girls of 13 or 15 years of age.
Pregnant and give birth to as many toys and ass
Instead of pushing them vigorously, in the name of the best interests of the child
Designed wrongly, right in the abortion room! Some kids, even if they
Academic failure and obviate existential existence, have the right to give rise to
But not to vote in favor of a particular policy. I will
Ask for the most wisdom: tick a box in the voting booth or
Nourish a child's mind and brain with all the subtle
His happiness, current and future, depends?

Let us grant, from fifteen years, the right to vote to adolescents, their idealism
Can only positively influence the crucial political orientations,
But let us not allow their lack of experience of the real world
To become a father, before time, of children who above all need
Experienced tutors, that is to say, having pushed as far as possible
Learning of the bionomic structures, and having fully
Masters of both their spiritual potential and their destiny

This skepticism in relation to the so-called "right" (philodoxic,

Philosophical) to give life must extend well beyond adolescents:
It seems less and less evident that everyone can enjoy unconditional
Of such a privilege.

To believe, as one does implicitly, that the parental instinct is sufficient,

Rest assuming that nature always does things right, these are
Criminally derisive attitudes. The sow sometimes devours its piglets by
Instinct ... and the various facts abound in "anecdotes" of fathers and mothers
Ignominiously unworthy, instinctive or not!

We hammer him: if humanity goes so badly,

It is primarily because we leave anyone
Reproduce no matter how!
Hence our surging sulteration:

How is it that there

Fertility?

And yet what a profusion, in our societies, of permits in all

Such as driving, hunting, fishing, weapons,
Construction, work, residence, travel (passport), burial, etc.
Without forgetting the always useful permits to practice a profession: the
Ubiquitous diplomas!

Everyone will consider it salutary, even indispensable, that a doctor or

Engineer or a solicitor or nurse or theologian
Does not obtain a license to practice without first demonstrating
Skills, but everybody feels natural that the first nabot
Self-proclaimed as an education specialist by simply putting a child
in the world ! He is not an educational specialist? But then how
Will he educate his child?

In the same vein, how can we justify

Certificate of "Good Life and Morals" (however ridiculous) to candidates
Parenting when it is required to enter many occupations
(Administration, police, magistrates ...)?

Personally, this contradiction reverses me. Is it a sector of life

Humanity where it is more important to deal with irreproachable people
Than in the creation of a new creature?

At the dawn of the nineteenth century century, Charles Fourier was already offended by the evil
Parental Disabilities:

The father is almost always incapable, either by imperfection in art

 To educate, either by inability to hatch and to satisfy the
Natural inclinations of the child.

The father is often so ill-educated that he only gives the child

Vicious impulses.

The child is more often depraved than cultivated, when his

Is entrusted to fathers, mostly incapable.
(Excerpts from Towards Freedom in Love: Selected texts.)

If Fourier rightly doubted paternal abilities, it was the know-how

As early as 1792, one of the most remarkable
Women's movement, Mary Wollstonecraft, in her
Defense of the Rights of Women:

The woman, in any situation slave of the prejudices, rarely exercises

An enlightened maternal love, for either she neglects her children, or she
Spoils them by an indulgent indulgence. In addition, the love of certain
For their children is, as I have already pointed out, often
Very bestial: for it stifles every spark of humanity.

And the twentieth Century, by the voice of this undoubted expert in psychology
Infant as D. W. Winnicott, to show himself, in L'Enfant et le Monde
Exterior, even more accusatory:

I would like to give a simple but accurate description,

One of the aspects of delinquency: its link with a lack of
family life. This could be useful for those who wish to
Understand the roots of the problem of delinquency.

Even the tocsin sound in 1995 when an FBI study confirms that 74%
Murderers have been victims of physical or psychological abuse within
Even their family!

Lost lyrics and statistics, even chanted by all

Criminologists: roots identified or not, we continue to
Offenders rather than charging their resigning parents, while
That no one is thinking of preventing these dramatic "family
Establishing a true Propedeutic to the Procreation!
Educators are nevertheless obliged to attend school
Years before they can start teaching, their
Task summarizes in its mass to transmit intellectual contents
To young souls; But which otherwise the parents themselves must have
Competence, wisdom and virtue of pedagogues, guides of children -
Wishes etymology - through the maze of life?

Who must have the highest aptitude: the teacher or the

Broodstock?

Knowing that most of the psychological difficulties that disrupt

Plethora of so-called adults find their source in childhood and
This childhood can escape the trauma only on condition
To live in a healthy family environment, it will be
Can no longer ignore the absolute need for
Methodical to parenting …

This is where Agathogenism comes in, with the three pillars

Should be as follows:

1. Compulsory education
To parenting

This training should ideally span four years of

Intensive courses: educational psychologists or
Child psychiatrists; However, it is not acceptable for individuals to become
Parents without a baggage equivalent to that of a specialist in the
Child psychology.

It is to parents that the most essential part of the education of

Children, it is therefore up to parents to be the best educated of all in education
Children! That it is not yet a truism indicates how long the
Before it reaches the shores of a humanity not only
Accomplished, but even: transmuted.

- What! ? But sir, no one will enter the professional life before
The age of 26, 27 or 28 if you add another 4-year cycle
Today!
- So much the better, the unemployment will diminish: the idlers of the moment will take the
Place of busy students to try to obtain a degree in Agathogenism.
But I grant you a concession: in default of an ideal curriculum of 4 years, a
Energetic training of a single year (and who dare to pretend it is impossible?)
Would already greatly reduce the trauma suffered by the child as a result of the
The failure of its parents!
- But who will finance these studies?"
- Parentalizables of course (any caprice possessing its price) as well as
Politicians who will finally understand that it costs less to
The company to invest in Childhood than in the repressive-security apparatus,
Penitentiaries and psychiatric asylums where victims often end up
Of parental incompetence.
- But what will those who have insufficient intellectual quotient do?"
- And what do today those whose quotient intellectual prohibits them
Access to profitable occupations? They will devote themselves to something else:
More than enough contemplated imbecility to reproduce. Do you think that the child
Wins to be born in a nest of idiots?
- You're shocking me.
- I hope so; it is the characteristic of the reformers." However, the most shocking
That nothing was done to ensure that the child would benefit
Of the best possible parents!
A child can not improvise.
It prepares itself, it requires a whole learning, a technical assimilation
And theoretical skills, a genuine know-how coupled with a
Real knowledge-lover that no one enjoys by the grace of the Holy Spirit ... Let's shoot
the results.

Nero was certainly Nero, but the one he had for his mother was called
Agrippina …

There is much to be said about the disastrous childhood of many heads of state
History in the monstrosity of their acts Their unbridled philanthropy ... or even the infernal
youth of the killers In series, bandits, great sadists, perverts and other psychopaths
So decried. It can never be said enough that Hitler and Stalin were children
Abused!

Another example: the "abominable" Dutroux, a scapegoat of our own

Had to undergo an "extremely violent" father as well as a mother
Abusive; Consequences: Dutroux's brother committed suicide, while Marc
Dutroux avenged himself for his part of his infantile distress lived in a
"Detestable family climate" (sic) by becoming enemy public number one ...
Who could be convinced that such progenitors are not for nothing
In the death of Julie and Melissa?

On the other hand, that Dutroux could have become without a father himself
Several children left a pantois: a "Permission to Procreate" would not allow
Not prevent such aberrations?

Is it necessary to recall the unbelief of specialists when faced with the supposed skills
Parents:

How many parents are fetishists of their children, how many are
Pedophiles or make their slaves their generations, how many
Or leave them without, without power, without knowing, without
Communication, without joy, while others imprison them in
A gilded prison, stifle them by their overprotection.
- Françoise Dolto, The Cause of the Children. France, 20th century

Parents must train the child according to himself and not

According to their own needs.

What parents see in their child is their own needs

And the hope of satisfying them. The child is not considered
For what it is.
- Arthur Janov, The Primal Cry. United States, 20th century.

Can we ignore any longer, in front of the daily carnage of

Psyches in flower, anger and the radical demand of certain visionaries:

The proliferation of children who are not guaranteed care

Of love and sensitive intelligence is a crime against
humanity.
- Raoul Vaneigem, Declaration of Rights
Of the human being. Belgium, XXI century.

No doubt: it is totally criminal to give birth without having

Of superior abilities!

The child has his language, his symbolic, his criteria, his needs, his landmarks,
Its adaptive rhythm, its evolutionary procedures, its personal fragilities: on
Do not engender without literacy and wisdom the grammar of a
Nascent soul! It is at least to know how to listen to it and not to impose it
Our latent fantasies. Alas, to use a famous formula: love
not enough…

The dream: an Academy of the Art of Engendering …

Perhaps we ignore the educational need because

Awakens in us the embarrassing memory that we are still
Children, on some side, and that we need to be
educated.
C.G. Jung, Problems of the modern Soul. Switzerland, 20th century.

2. Psychoanalysis
Of candidates for childbirth

It will be possible without inconveniences to take place during the school cycle mentioned
above. The undertaking of such a work of elucidating oneself would avoid
Reporter on his progeny his own complexes or unresolved traumas.
Too many children carry the consequences of the tormented soul of their
Broodstock; No one is freed from his unconscious before he has explored it
The abyss! Independently of the expected catharsis and the sapience
Relational implications, it is important that psychoanalysis succeed
To make future parents aware of the phenomena,
Always deleterious, of Projection and Displacement, which are
Root of most family conflicts and failures.

Let's listen again Janov and Dolto:

The main reason why children become neurotic

Is, in my opinion, the fact that their parents are too
They lead against their own unsatisfied child needs.
A woman can conceive a child in order to be able to
Pampering like a baby - which she actually experienced the need
all his life. As long as it is at the center of attention, it
Is relatively happy. But after childbirth, she
To sink into a deep depression. The pregnancy served its
And had nothing to do with the arrival in the world of a new
To be human.
 Whether it is through acerbic criticism or firm advice,
Parents try to use a defenseless child to satisfy their
Own frustrated needs.
- Arthur Janov, The Primal Cry. United States, 20th century.

We now know that madness is often induced in children

By his parents, who are apparently healthy.

Families sadise their children to save themselves from their

Suffering.

The genesis of neuroses dates back to the history of parents and sometimes
Grand parents.
- Françoise Dolto, The Cause of the Children. France, 20th century

Irreconcilable parents who take their childhood victim on their

Own children …

When will we decide to break this circle frankensteinequementment

"Father-nie-cieux"? How long will we have to resign ourselves to the
Most parents play the role of pathogens for their children?

Needless to remind that in general the bad parents are those who had
To undergo bad parents: we will never limit to this diabolical cycle
Without directing all the parents to a psychoanalysis allowing them to
Emancipate themselves from their hidden demons!

By the way, such a dive into the mysteries of his own psyche
The harmony and stability of couples and
Children of the drama of divorce or the distressing parental disputes.

- Yes, but I do not believe in psychoanalysis.

- You know, even today some people are struggling to believe that the sun
Turns around the earth ... Freud and Jung were incontestably to the soul
What Copernicus was to the understanding of celestial mechanics. You do not
Do not believe in psychoanalysis? But perhaps you believe in the purity of your
Desire of child …
We can not admit that the works of Freud, Jung, Winnicott,
Bettelheim, Janov, David Cooper, Melanie Klein and Françoise Dolto
These must be regarded as mere
Capacity for practical applications; According to the Socratic injunction of "Know thyself
You ", we begin to clarify the main mechanisms of the soul
And understand more and more what parental attitude prejudices
The child or on the contrary opens it to the best of himself and of the world. It would be
Not use such a science and refuse to apply it
Now to the indispensable Education of Parents!

3. Prohibit all procreation

Before the age of 30

No marriage before 30 years: it was already the advice of Hesiod in Les

Works and Days as well as Plato in his Laws …

How indeed tolerate that bejaunes, the pupils of all cognition

A little deepened of the challenges and difficulties of existence, arrogate themselves
The prerogative to throw a new being into this existential jungle where they
Hardly stammered? What do we know about life at twenty? Worse: what is known about
Self or the Human at that age?

One of the priority aims of Agathogenism is to give the child

Mature and responsible parents, not heads-in-the-air who know nothing about
Or the suffering of a human trajectory. At twenty, the spirit
Hardly emerges from his cocoon, at twenty-two he moves cautiously away from the
Family nest, at twenty-five it is only extirpated from the illusions of love and
Ambition, at thirty it can be assumed that he received enough slaps and
Camouflages as well as endured enough of destinal cramps to start
To doubt the benevolence of Fortune, according to the Stoic diasyrism.

We can not imagine creatures in the state of chrysalises, very feebly

In life, both emotionally and professionally, are embarking on
The perilous adventure of raising a child and enrolling him in the
The labyrinth of Becoming. Without going into the rigors of existentialism, we
Believe that before being, one must have somewhat existed ...

The child is entitled to parents not only art experts to educate

But also experienced in art to overcome hassles, disappointments, trials and Fractures of all
kinds, an experience which obviously does not conquer
Than on the battlefield of life.

One does not become head of state or cardinal at twenty, by what ineptitude
Would become a spiritual master of a child of twenty-two? When I meet
Of parents under the age of thirty, I still feel the desire to offer them
A teat, if not a bellow when they confess that I never opened a
Book of child psychology.

- But, sir, at thirty, a woman risks becoming a mother of a

Malformed!
- You've probably heard about prenatal diagnosis and techniques
Abortifacients? In addition, if concern for the genetic integrity of the embryo
Is concerned at this point, why do you not forbid all maternity beyond
Of thirty years? Shortly before menopause, there are still many women,
Publicly congratulated, to give birth to an unfortunate, doubtless
Exposed to become orphan quickly, but in perfect health …

As for me, I like a malformed and aborted embryo better than a soul
Parenting that could lead to abortion of the child's destiny!

To forbear any childbirth before having passed his thirties,

In addition to a higher maturity and a much more consistent life experience,
The following undeniable advantages: increased reflection time on the
His "desire for a child" (who, therefore, only to meditate according to their
The inherent disadvantages of taking care of a child
Would not waive?); Marital equilibrium, knowing that the hunt for
Sexual partners is more characteristic of adolescence than adulthood; a
In general, the appeasement of passions for the benefit of reason; Finally, and
If one is patient until 36 years for example (as well as Aristotle
Recommended in its Policy), professional stability and
Increased material resources.

As many major profits that the child would surely benefit,

And we are inclined to think that the ideal age for childbearing is rather
Between 30 and 40 years that between 15 and 25 ...
- But, monsieur, pity, all these measures have something extremely
Dissuasive!
"That is the least we ask of them." To re-read them, moreover, these
Sufficiently utopian for us to be able to that they will one day become reality.
Also boring or binding
Would appear, it is sufficient to note that there is no
An argument against them so that they eventually eradicate inertia.
After immersing it against its will in the uncomfortable pot of
Existence, the spawners have no rights over their offspring, only one
Infinity of duties! Of which the least turns out to become virtuosos science
psycho …

The challenge is extreme because if parents do not become capable of giving

The best of themselves to the child, the child will never be able to
In turn give the best of itself to mankind, while the latter
Will continue miserably its march towards the Absurd on the paths of
War of all against all "and the universal devouring …

The humanity of tomorrow is being prepared in families:

Should we entrust the fate of humanity to the incapable?

Childhood stands as both the last and the first combat

Of a Humanism which would have ended with the half-measures in which the
Hypocritical catechism of the well-being and their desire not to
Not give up their privileges, which all rely on one form or another
Exploitation of Others. From the instrumentalisation of the child to capitalism,
No solution of continuity: it is always a matter of drawing pleasure from suffering
the other. The entrepreneur is only a collective incarnation of the father
Sadistic father, and the sadistic father himself was most often a child
That the family nucleus should be the model of every construction
Clearly explains many of the horrors of which each individual is guilty
Civilization!

Clearly, Humanism will be renewed in Childhood or

Well, invaded by its own ethical contradictions, will slowly
In its lack of revolutionary audacity. If we wish to give ourselves
A last chance to stop all cycles of reproduction of violence
(As reification-alienation of man by man), we must
Urgent refocus reflection on the figure of the Child. What is the use of
Of Lévinas, to appeal to the perfect respect of the Other if we are not
Not even able to respect authentically those we
World? The problem of procreation ultimately results from all the
It is, to say the least, astounding that there is so little debate about its
As well as the conditions of its relevance ...
Parent Education is undoubtedly one of the major challenges
Century: we can not understand why no one seems to
Pressed to put it in a legally binding framework. The belief in miracles
Would she have taken refuge in faith in the infused science of procreators?

We have just outlined the protocol aimed at "engendering" parents

Quality: it rests on a tripod which it seems delicate to remove
The least member, but, in an agathogenic perspective always,
Other measures would undoubtedly remain without influence on the dexterity
Of future spawners.

For example, it would be time to propose systematically,

High school students, dissertations on the question of the merits of procreation
And to discuss profusely, as early as secondary school, the theme
No one, it may be supposed, will dare to call it adventitious or ridiculous.

Similarly, it is not possible to postpone further the opening of a public debate

On the ethical legitimacy of childbirth, such as there had been, formerly or in the past,
Concerning the abolition of slavery (outrage and acceptance), suffrage
Universal (outrage and acceptance), contraception (outrage and acceptance),
Abortion (uproar and acceptance), euthanasia (tolerance and acceptance),
Homosexual marriage (outrage and acceptance) or the decriminalization of
Cannabis (tollé then acceptance) …

The next bioethics controversy will concern the very legitimacy of

To give life or to get caught up in its own ridiculousness: the problematic
Cloning seems insignificant when compared to the foundations
Axiological processes of procreation.

To summarize this chapter: Whereas it is intolerable that the last of the

Asses, the supreme of the brutes and the most angular of the sadists have the right
To generate at will, we grasp the legislator so that he concocted
As a matter of urgency, a decree prohibiting access to parental
Not having reported the most perfect aptitudes for such a function! He's going there
Not only the well-being of children but, in turn, of humanity
whole.

How parents raise their child

 Influences its future enormously.
- Bruno Bettelheim, To Be Acceptable Parents.
United States, 20th century.

You will certainly be happy, ladies the ogresses and gentlemen the vampires,
To have your child. But do you really believe that your child
Will be happy to have you as parents? This should be the only stone
Of touch of your desire …

We have just suggested some ways to alleviate the evil

Parental: they will certainly irritate, but you yourself, inevitable zo
Do you propose as a pharmacopoeia to the "Mal-Procreer", to the "Cacogenism"
The cost of which we make every day, up to and including
The glaring inadequacy of social structures to the real needs of individuals?

Do not look elsewhere

The source of anthropic chaos:
No occupation requires more skills
That the trade of parents and it is for that one
The least!

Is maltreatment anything that,

By action or omission,
Harm the development of a child.
- Pierre Lassus, Childhood sacrificed. From Maltreatment
Children and the few efforts to combat it. France, 20th century
 Posture xi
Métatocie

Perpetuation by generation is common to beasts;

But memory, merit, and noble works are peculiar to men:
And surely a man will find that the noblest works
And foundations have proceeded from men without children.
- Lord Francis Bacon, Essays.
England, 17th century

Agathogenism (literally: childbirth according to

Goodness, goodness), as a doctrine advocating a procreation resting
On ethics and wisdom (rather than on caprice, ignorance, imperialism,
Hormonalism and reproductive immaturity) remains a
Transition: if the learning of "well-procreating" is the aim
Practice of our discourse, its least utopian dimension, we can not
To forget that from a strictly theoretical and philosophical point of view, nothing
Replaces the absolute agenism, the radical non-procreative, this will
Redemption which arises as the fruit of a reinvestment of the psyche by
The spiritual powers to the detriment of the instinctual forces, and
On the transmutation of the desire for reproduction into a desire for salvation,
Infallible consequence is none other than the extinction of all human pain,
According to the emblematic aim of Buddhist thought.

Thus, in line with this soteriological aspiration, the term

Of agathogenism lends itself to two possible readings: one can certainly
To understand as the doctrine of the "Good-Engender" but also, and above all,
As an incentive to the "Generation of Good" instead of a creature
Blood and algae.
This is the theme of spiritual procreation dear to so many doctrines
Of which Plato, in his Banquet, already praised the
Mouth of a woman, prophetess moreover, "the very wise Diotimus," who,
After having evoked "what is appropriate for the soul to give birth: wisdom and others
Virtues ", did not shrink from this assertion:

"There is no one who likes to see such children

according to the flesh, when he considers Homer, Hesiod, and
Other great poets, whom he envies to have left behind them offspring
Immortals who assure them a glory and a memory too
immortal. "

Before finding, sarcastically enough:

"For having produced many brilliant and

Virtues of all kinds: many temples were consecrated to them
Of these spiritual children; Nobody got it for children
From a woman. "

It is indeed this process of procreation according to the Spirit that subsumes the term
Of Metatology: to the letter, "To give birth beyond" (implying: the impulse
Primary reproductive health).

The paradigm of this begetting of essence, it may be said, is metaphysical

We are delivered in the famous myth of Zeus giving "birth"
To Athena, the latter springing miraculously, adult and already all battleship
Wisdom, the head of the king of the gods, as to initiate us to the idea that the
True fertility is that of the soul and not that of the crotch …
As a proof, Athena will remain obstinately virgin and will have no other
Descent that the Arts themselves of which it will be constituted as protector
Archetypal, sharing this function with the Muses, they too
Traditionally chaste and nulliparous .... Born virginally, Athena, pure
Incarnation of the Intellect Redeemer, will retain his virginity for the
Logos: this is not without anticipating certain Christian mythème …

It is not indifferent to note that the Acropolis (metaphor

Of Olympus and therefore of the supreme divine presence), this "heavenly city"
Who watched over all the destinies of the Greek capital, consisted
The majority of temples devoted to Virginity in the respective species
Athena and Artemis.

In other words, being born, living and dying under the aegis of the Parthenon (the
Virginal) where transcendent wisdom stood up, the spiritual ideal for
An Athenian of the classical era was none other than the Metatocy itself!
If, at least, the tutelary deity of Athens designated at each
Citizen an exemplum to imitate, which we can not doubt since
Identification with the electoral divinity is one of the major motions of the
Religious sentiment …

From the outset, Athena's favorite, philosophy was placed under the auspices of the
Psychically fertile virginity, thus affirming the superiority of sublimation
Instincts on their conventional and mammiferous acceptance. Word
Of order which will not remain simply theoretical since many princes
"Lovers of wisdom" will make it imperative not to fashion any posterity
Of malodorous meat.

Without courting exhaustiveness, here is a transhistoric sample of

These heroes of the nulliparity of which can boast the most insecure
Of the noetic disciplines: Thales, Heraclitus, Democritus, Plato, Diogenes,
Pyrrhon, Epicurus, Epictetus, Plotinus, Avicenna, Thomas Aquinas, Eckhart,
Duns Scot, Erasme, Giordano Bruno, Francis Bacon, Pascal, Spinoza, Locke,
Malebranche, Leibniz, Voltaire, Hume, Kant, Bentham, Count, J. S. Mill,
Kierkegaard, Spencer, Nietzsche, Teilhard de Chardin, Wittgenstein, Adorno,
Sartre, Hannah Arendt, Simone de Beauvoir, Simone Weil, Foucault and, well
Cioran ... None of these indestructible children will have children other than
spiritual. We can guess, if we had to rely on the philosophers to populate
The planet, it would soon be rid of the odious predator-oppressor
Human.

As for the thinkers of geniuses who have become generators of mourners,

Unloading, let us admit that it was not easy, in the Contraceptive trampling in the random, not
to have Babies…

Thus we should consider Schopenhauer as nulliparous since

The natural child which is known to him, and which resulted from an unfortunate coitus
With his maidservant, was in no way desired or recognized by the Emperor
Of the Unborn. One can not doubt that this kind of macabre accident
Compelled more than one philosopher to comb his hair in spite of himself with the infamous
bonnet
Of reproducer ...

Who will tell us how many great men had the misfortune to
Become fathers without having only touched upon volition?

Besides, as mitigating circumstances, these

More fecal, which in ancient times obliged every Greek or Roman citizen to
If not a new soldier, at least a new corps in the service of
The collectivity, raising in passing the indignation of a Tertullian:

This burden of children and the laws

To have, because no sage would ever have spontaneously desired
children.
- Tertullian, Exhortation to Chastity. Rome, IIIe century.

We can not say better ...

Trained by single or nulliparous thinkers, centered on primacy
Of Reason, traversed by an infinite mistrust of the phenomena
Instinctual or organic, haunted by the suspicion that the body is the executioner
Of the spirit, thirsting for transcendence and lovingly turned towards the sky
Intelligible realities, in the endless quest for a peaceful solution
To the problem of Evil, the whole history of philosophy is indeed
Decoding as a Himalayan exhortation to the sliding of the Child
Charnel (Sarcopède) towards the Spiritual Child (Psychopédie): each work
Philosophical, consciously or not, devalues the works of the generation
Placing both the intellectual performance and the search for truthfulness
In the forefront of the human condition and development
Authenticity of the individual.

Lover of logical ties, father of theories and conceptions of the world,

As a creator of words seeking remedy for evils, the philosopher tends to
Disinterestedness of the marmots and the mediocrity of the soft flesh, considering that
Which even the most fetid of jackals or cockroaches shows itself capable:
"Do little", a rather bad framework, in the end, with the idea that
The entelechy proper to mankind: to do great things!

One of his friends exhorted her to have children. "Be not afraid,
He said, as progeny, I leave behind victories
Olympic. "
- Diogenes the Cynic. Greece, IVth Century. J.-C

Less an allusive, the disciple of Antisthenes could have proclaimed: triumphs

philosophical …

A few hundred years later, an athlete of Stoicism will

Theme:

By God! Those who introduce two or three children in their place

Unpleasant snoring do they render more services to men
Than those who [philosophize]?
Did the Thebans benefit more from so many people who
Left a posterity than Epaminondas who had no children? And
Has not Homer contributed more to the social good than Priam with the
Fifty plagues he has engendered?
The composition of a work will prohibit a man from marrying
And to have children, without it being believed for all that that he renounced
For nothing to paternity.
- Epictetus, Interviews. Greece, IIe century.

Let the mystics, the sages, the religious masters, the great
Artists or turbulent ones, although rotten, rejects of Athena that are
The philosophers, the obsession is revealed everywhere and always identical: transmute
Our desire for earthly children in search of a higher reign of the Spirit. We
Recognizes without difficulty, in this metatagic tension, the very program of
Alchymy (no gratuity in the election of this ancient spelling: it aims
To restore its primary meaning to this "science of all sciences" by too much
To metamorphose the lead of the chthonian drive into gold
Apollinian realization.

It therefore seems that a way opens, already well marked, to the future amateurs
Parenting (that, in any case, the need to stem the
Overpollupopulation will suffice to frustrate their envy more than ever illegitimate):
Transform, like the most brilliant souls of humanity, the immanent and
Futile "will" that their genes have to perpetuate themselves into a real will
Conscious and personal to leave behind "Olympic victories"
Rather than this vulgar pittance for maggots that will always remain a
Sarcopède.

These "Olympic victories", these virtuous psychopedists, do not necessarily

For names books, works of art or scientific works; each

Among us, even the least gifted for the labors of the intellect or
Aesthetics, can give birth to the soul rather than to sex.

As soon as the desire of an animal posterity was repressed,

Philanthropic, ethical, environmentalist, all fight against the
Squabble of injustice and oppression, any will to remedy the
Deficiencies of the real, belong to the Metatocy.

As soon as the envy of a trivial posterity was decapitated, every work of the heart in
Favor of creatures subjected by their very existence to the suffering
Belongs to the Metatocy.

As soon as the envy of a bestial posterity was calcined, every obstinate step towards
Wisdom, excellence, self-improvement is a matter of metatology.

As soon as the desire for an intestinal posterity is crushed, all energy invested in
Revolt and in the reaffirmation of humanist or creative values
Of Metatology.
In short, as soon as the desire for genital posterity was exterminated, every work, every
Struggle, all action, whether based on love or intelligence,
To a "well-being-in-the-world" that is beneficial to all
Of Metatology.

The metatocious faculty, this "know-to-be-beyond-bestial", is the

Sine qua non of altruism: we do not become capable of attention
To the Other than by transcending the hereditary impulses which, in the state of nature,
We only wish to the satisfaction of our own appetites.

This effort of transmutation animated all the thought of Schopenhauer:

Work of Art or Compassion rather than a work of breeding, we
He taught; Mobilize the gigantic instinctual energies (of which
In every creature prisoner of the will to live is reduced to guaranteeing
The unnecessary survival of the species ... at the well-known price of the perpetuation of
Punishment of all its representatives) and convert them into psychic energies
Which can be used to improve the lot of individuals who are already in distress.
Not only the forces, but also the colossal time we would spend
To our vain descent, let us devote them to the already alive!

Such is the true birth of childhood: that which is

The Spirit (as a conjunction of feeling and thought) to the detriment
Obedience to the grotesque, and oh so defective, DNA molecule
Which constitutes us, for our great dam …

There is therefore no doubt that if humanity

Of a salvation, a tearing away from its circular destined for torments, it does not
Will only reach it by a metatagic-type approach,
Of spiritual creation rather than carnal procreation.

This is the reason why Athena, a true prefigurator of Christ,

Had for epithet Σωτε ρα: the Savior! How better than by such a
The message that Salvation proceeds directly from the
Virginity, understood in ultimate analysis less as renunciation
To the sensuality, to the firmamentelles erotic jubilations, that as
That formal refusal to beget!

The neo-Platonist Proclus will not be mistaken who stung all along
Hymns and Prayers to invoke sometimes the Muses, sometimes the chaste goddess of
Sapience (in the attributions of which also entered, very significantly,
Justice, Health, Victory and Peace) so that they remove it from the Procreation
(Γενεσ ουργ α) and protect it from the perils of Birth (γενε λ )! Thus Proclus
Will push his desire for freedom from the terrestrial world until he celebrates the
"Hatchet" of Athena which "by cutting at the root the bestial heads of Hecate slept the
Generation of suffering ", thus translating, one can no longer martially, the victory
Final of the beneficent Nullipare on the Triple Archaic Mother Goddess …

If there was any further proof that the Soteriological Virginity

Was much more at the heart of Greek spirituality than dared
Confess to thinkers especially concerned to project in paganism
Their fertility fantasies crumpled by the severe exigencies of Christianity,
Let us consider for a moment the figure of Hestia: so few myths
This Olympian is perhaps because it embodies the quintessence,
In its mysterious indecency and above all in its neanting propensities,
The religious effort.

Eternal virgin by her own will, Hestia was enthroned in the center as well
Of the human foci and of the residence of the Olympians, and this in the form,
So magnificently hostile to all corporality, of the Fire, symbolization which
Consecrated a presence in each temple, dedicated at one time to
God, sometimes to another, but always inhabited by this axial exhortation to the
Virginity-Nulliparity: Hestia.

Sacred flame was declared this goddess, that is, spiritual fervor, that is,
Ie transmutation of its genetic rust in clear devotion to
Spheres: in short, a pure prototype of the Platonic Diotima, which
Was worthy of God, since it encouraged us, we
Seen, to leave the babies soon outdated for the benefit of works unalterable ...

It is known that the Romans will identify this remarkable divine

Vesta whose sacredness was not less, which was worth the punishment of death
By inhumation (or how to return to earth what sins by the earth) to
Priestesses trying to evade their paradigmatic chastity-sterility.
How should we interpret this rigid centrality of the goddesses
Virgins and nullipares in the system of ancient religious thought? As
An apology for hysterical and unbridled maternity? Or as a
Index of the unavowable equation Spirituality = Nulliparity? At each of
judge. But without doubt Pan was dead before the speech of
Christ…
The ethnopsychanalyst Georges Devereux, in his essay entitled Femme et
Myth, confessed to experiencing certain difficulties in understanding the profound reason
Of the universal veneration of Virginity: he was astonished and offended at the
Once "the tiny membrane of the hymen has been culturally over-invested
And over-elaborated to the point of becoming the nucleus of a collective delirium pure and
simple "
And could not help but consider the "obsession with virginity" as a
"Derailment".

The motive of such a Parthenolatry seems to us translucent and

Superior rationality: that it asserts itself in the person of Maat in the
Egyptians, in that of Athena or in that of Christ, if Virginia
Mystical and salvific virtues, it is because it reveals itself in its
Essence, radical disdain of all fertility other than spiritual!

Virginity is Extinction; And Extinction is Salvation ... How

Would it not be possible for the collective unconscious to make Virginia
Supreme value?

(It goes without saying that, in mythical or philosophical language,

"Virgin" does not mean "without sex" but "without
Children ". Artemis wants to be "virgin", which does not prevent him from indulging
Eroticism with the nymphs that accompany it ... The only
Soteriologically unsustainable defloration is the one that has
The ultimate depracement of the fetus that is born to the maltreat-
Violated his nervousness. Thus any sexual enjoyment between consenting adults
Is she spiritually pure, except that of begetting! )

In a very eloquent way, a structural division of the different

Mythologies secreted by humanity would easily
Universal valuation of the Light-Intelligence-Wisdom-Chastity sequence
A devaluation of the antithetical sequence Darkness-Animality-Malévolence-Fecundity.
But this manifesto is not the place of such a demonstration;
Will be the subject of one of our later works.

We will not fail to mention various figures of the

Virginity-Nulliparity "enigmatically" associated with mental functions
Superiors: Maât, Seshat, the pythies, the sibyls, Artemis, Minerva, Diana,
Egeria, Cassandra, Daphne (virginity made laurel ...), Britomartis, Astrée,
Diké (Justice wants to be a virgin ...), Helia, Constantina, the Valkyries, the
Gallisenae Celtic, the Daënâ Virtue of the Zoroastrians, the Houris of paradise
Muslims, the virgins of the Sun in the Incas, the Babylonian Naditus (these
Immaculate ones devoted to Shamash, also deity of the Sapiential Light),
Elijah, Elisha, Jeremiah, Judith, Maryam, Aisha, Nizham, as well as the copy
Kuan-yin who will remind us that until the Far East Goodness
Transcendent willingly incarnates in a creature refusing fiercely
To marry and to dive into the disasters of the world of innocent babies ...

For the time being, let us remember that Metatocie

Recapitulates itself into a fundamental equation:

Desire for Children =/= Creativity

Or to state it in a more severe form:

Become geniuses
Rather than spawners!

Imperative that the Ancients translated

By the saying which Nietzsche made famous:

Aut Liberi aut Libri:

Or Children or Books.

Thus it was that Orpheus, the paragon of the poet and the mystic, had no
Child but a luxuriance of talents. Let's bet he made the right choice
Between docility in the simian and tropism towards the superman …

As long as Nietzsche, always so readily wielded by the

Theorists of the "all-in-drive" even though he considered that "one
Philosopher married has its place in the comedy "(as for the thinker pouponnant ...),
Leave it to him to close this chapter by listening to him expressing his
Own intuition of agathogenism:
 "You are young and wish child and marriage.
But I ask you: are you someone
Who wants to have a child?
Are you the victor, the ruler of himself,
The master of the senses, the lord of your virtues?
So I ask you.
Or is that which speaks in your desire the beast or the need?
Or loneliness? Or self dissatisfaction? "
- Friedrich Nietzsche, Thus spoke Zarathustra.
Germany, 19th century
.
It goes without saying that worthy heir of Orpheus, Diotima and Athena, and
In spite of the savage Dionysism with which it was desired to deprive him, this master of
suspicion Metatociac conversion, since, having been
Refused to engender the slightest sarcopède, humanity owes it all the same
A thriving line of deliciously bibliomorphic children ...

Posture x
Salvation by Feminism
 The important thing for women,
Is to participate as much as possible
To all useful causes.
- Marguerite Yourcenar,
Open eyes. France, 20th century

If we start with the thousand-fold theorem that a woman does not desire
To fill a gap, (in Greek, the radical υστερ- designates
Times the matrix and indigence ...), only courting motherhood to compensate
Frustrations of all origins and fill the emptiness that in it digs the harsh
Monotony of life, it seems clear that the more opportunities will be
Women to flourish in all areas of life,
The women will resort to the subterfuge of childbirth to dress
His understandable dissatisfactions.

What is certain is that feminism will play a crucial role in the struggle
Against fertility. All demographers recognize that women are
Never so fertile as in the most phallocate societies (Africa, Islam,
Judaism ...) where women are often reduced to their reproductive function
And deprived of any other destiny than that of a surrogate mother, docile nurse
Of the offspring of the male, of which we have seen that he willingly used his
(Testis) (small witnesses) of his derisive virility.

Feminists have shrewdly suspected that the child was

Excellence the tool of oppression of woman by the masculine tyrannical:
Countless men want to become fathers only in order to
Masters of the woman they will fertilize, thus ensuring the enjoyment of a
Sexual object become dependent on their wages and protection. Since
The dawn of time, it is always because of the child that the woman becomes the
Possession of man!

The myth of the maternal woman was made by the

Because every man, in his disarray before the inexhaustible tasks
That it imposes its being-in-the-world, wants to live forever in the arms of a
A genitor who is succorable, inclined, if possible, to ancillary devotion;
On the other hand because every male knows that there is no
A woman than to give her a large number of offspring, the
Thus depriving any existential or economic autonomy.
From this point of view, the real stake of the emancipation of the feminine seems
Less its relation to man than its own relation to the child fantasized.
The wife is also rid of the child; Abandoned to the
Procreation, she essentially breastfeeds her servitude ...

Thus it is no more serious error, from a feminist perspective, than

Continue to claim that women do not fully realize their femininity
Than in maternity, which in reality only reproduces the discourse
Machist and serve the best interests of the male oppressor.

Simone de Beauvoir understood that in The Second Sex, after

Scrupulously lacerated the chimera of maternal goodness and underlined
How few women have the talent to raise or love their
Children, advanced these considerations:

There is no maternal "instinct": the word does not apply in any

To the human species. [...] It is not even true that the child is
For the woman a privileged achievement. [...] Whether the child is
The supreme end of the woman, this is a statement that has just
The value of an advertising slogan.

Thus this exemplary feminist, a true Athena of the future (libertine intellectuel-nullipare),
"She congratulated herself every day for not having
Had children ".

We can only congratulate him in concert because not only the

Family is indeed the root of any social structure benefiting the male
To the detriment of women, but also because it is precisely because of
Identification with the archetype of fertility that the woman undergoes
Outrages that we know. Paradox? It deserves development.

At the risk of overriding the theme that governs us, we would be happy
To bring our stone to the building of the City of the Ladies imagined, and strong
Judiciously placed under the patronage of a virgin, by Christine de Pisan.
The latter was already terrified at the endemicity of the execution of the woman
In most human literary or religious productions. that
To think in effect of the acerbity of the following sentences, multiplied to infinity,
In all latitudes?
It is from [Pandora] that the race, the accursed
Women, a terrible scourge set in the midst of mortal men.
Zeus, for the great misfortune of mortal men, created women
Whose nature is prone to evil.
Hesiod, Theogony. Greece, VII Century. AD

Misfortune is not sent from heaven,

It comes from women.
Che-King (Book of Odes). China, VIth Century. AD

We must beware of women. For one who is wise, it is

A thousand who are mad or wicked. The woman is fierce and cunning as the
brigand. She rarely tells the truth.
Buddha, Tripitaka. India, VIth Century. AD

Nature has made us women,

Without any aptitude for the good,
But for evil, very learned workers.
Euripides, Medea. Greece, Fifth Century. AD

I find the woman more bitter than death,

Because it is a trap.
The Ecclesiastes (Qohelet). Israel, Third Century. AD

It is through woman that sin began

And it is because of her that we all die.
The Ecclesiastic (Ben Sira). Israel, 2nd Century. J.-C

Longing, anger, perversity, evil nature, and

Misconduct, this is what the Creator gave in sharing
Women's.
Laws of Manu. India, circa I century BC. AD

"Mithra hates women! "

Formula which in antiquity summarized the prohibition
Made women participate in the Mithraic Mysteries.
There is honey in the language of women;
In their hearts there is nothing but poison.
Pancatantra. India, circa IIe century.

You give birth in pain and anguish, woman, [...] And you
Ignores that Eve, is it you? [...] You're the devil's door.
Tertullian, The Toilet of Women. Rome, IIIe century.

The woman compels us to commit even in spite of ourselves a thousand

sins.
John Chrysostom, Virginity. Greece, IVth century.

As soon as Eve was born, Satan came into the world with her.
Midrash Rabbi on Genesis. Israel, Fifth century.

Hell is mostly populated by women.

Hadith (word attributed to Mohammed). Arabia, VIIth century.

The whole woman is an evil.

This is attributed to Imam Ali. Arabia, VIIth century.

We must guard each woman as a poisonous snake

Or the Horned Devil.
Albert the Great, On the Animals. Germany, Thirteenth century.

"The faults I have committed have caused me to be born in a body

female. "
Shôsan, Ninin-Bikuni. Japan, Seventeenth century

This sickening potpourri is at least sufficient to convince oneself that abhorrence

Of the feminine impregnates the five great contemporary religions of the humanity:
From Judaism to Buddhism through Islam, Christianity and
Hinduism.

Whoever would have the curiosity to measure the stupefying extent of the grievances
Against the "daughters of Eve" will plunge profitably into
Books such as Cette Mâle Assurance by Benoîte Groult or the Dictionnaire
Misogyne by Agnès Michaux, illuminating inventories of malaise and hostility
Experienced by the human psyche in front of a creature endowed with a uterus.

Let us think again of the countless negative female figures, the most
Often correlated with maternity, emerging in the thundering majority
Of mythological discourses: Lilith, Eve, Jezebel, Pandora, Echidna, Circe,
Lamia, Striges, Harpies, Medusa, Coatlicue, Tlazolteotl, Ixchel, Toci,
Cihuacoatl, Pulowi, Tuonetar, Louhi, Loviatar, Syöjätär, Rati, Sedna, Kharina,
Nambi, Baba Yaga, Lamashtu, Tiamat, Ereshkigal, Ishtar, Kunapipi, Hin-
Kahausibware, Mâyâ, Kâlî, Sekhmet, Mebd, Morrigan, Mélusine, Hel,
Si-wang-mou, Izanami, Sophia-Prounikos, and finally the abominable Druj, for
We will stick to this tiny diachronic and intercontinental sample ...

Finally, let us consider the customary association, in most cultures,

Between the Mother Goddess and the noxious or despicable animals: snakes, dragons,
Scorpions, spiders, crocodiles, octopuses, hippos, cows, sows, bears,
Wolves, lions, wild beasts, fierce beasts or hairy predators, claws, viscous and
Poisonous of all obedience?

There is no dispute, it seems that femininity-maternity inspires very little

Sympathy to the symbolic function of the collective unconscious.
Here the heart muscle of the problem is unraveled: why
Religions try to convince us that the misfortune has entered the
The world because of a woman's fault, otherwise because it is
Woman we make our entrance into the misfortunes of the world?

It is useless to deplore the "misogynic constant" in the writings

Human beings: it imposes itself as an undeniable fact, as an invariant
Anthropological, if it is desired to defuse it definitively,
To elucidate the focal significance without merely ascribing it to stupidity or
To the wickedness of the male, as little objectivable as the so-called vices
Women ".

If we ask why femininity did at all times

The object of such a virulent universal disregard, we find
Decidedly other answer than this: all born of a woman's body
And detesting all - subliminally to the very least - having seen the light of day, we
Can only abominate those who carry within their entrails the matrix of
All our sorrows!
By a phenomenon of amalgam well known to psychoanalysts
(Condensation-displacement), misogyny, of which so many women have
Themselves made guilty, is in fact only a roundabout form and
Pervert of anti-natalism, or more precisely: all Misogyny is
Last instance that Metaphobia camouflaged! Metaphobia, that is to say:
Hatred of the Mother ... We denounce all women for not daring to hate
Consciously our own parent, for not even daring to confess to us
Our inner heart that we would have preferred not to have undergone the trauma
Of birth, according to the decisive expression of Otto Rank! This is the
The ultimate key to any misogyny: we relate without hesitation our rancor
To have been born on all those whose uterine organ is capable of
To have us born ...
It is important to understand that it is only by dissociating
Radically maternity and femininity that we can hope to finish one
Day with the scourge of phallocracy, and that it is above all in this energetic
Work of disconfusion, of semiotic disintrication, that resides the main stake
Of feminism to come: as long as women make motherhood affirmation
Of its identity or will claim it as the very essence of its destiny,
It can only expose itself to the disdain of wounded creatures for having had to live,
If not to despise itself unconsciously. At the risk of generating some
Grimaces on the faces of maternalists, we felt it was important to
This analysis to meditation: even if it were to be rejected, it would
Succeed in explaining the reasons for misogyny and why its character
Universal…

To put an end to gynophobia as a

That repressed expression of our ontophobia, so that the ages dissipate
Darkness of the procreative femininity and which finally produces the eon of the woman
Creativity, it is now a question of over-valuing, even of heroism, the
Children, to give him a nimbus, honors and benefits equal to those
Which the mother of a large family enjoyed under the dictatorship of the males.

With a view to supporting this strategy, it is necessary not only to

Absolute freedom of contraception and abortion,
Contraception and infertility through financial incentives: one could go
Up to imagine a nest egg whose value would increase over the years
Passed in the firm refusal to procreate!

In reverse of these political strangers who in this year 2003 come

To grant to French breeders a "birth grant of 800 euros
"With the stated purpose of stimulating fertility conducive to financing
Future of pensions (refer to posture II for a denunciation in good standing
Of this excremental reification-monetization of the Child) as well as in
The inadmissible purpose of keeping the woman at home, far from the world of
Thought and action that the masculine obviously continues to want to
Reserve, it must be said: the woman has better things to do in her best years than
To raise children whose humanity is already too
Less need. It must be said: the woman has better to make of her formidable
Potential to suffocate them under a coulis of diapers. It is necessary
The woman is wrong to dissolve her talents in the futility of the bottles. he
The "real" woman is the artist or philanthropist woman and not the
A populating woman. We must magnify the poetesses and denigrate the lactating women.
It must be said: women must now enjoy the most favorable conditions
To the creation of the masterpieces whose societal phallism of the past was aimed at
banish. It must be said: if a man wants children he can manage for the
In the home, the woman having given enough by incubating them during
A novena of the moons and giving birth to them in a heart-wrenching
agony. It must be said: a woman is all the more beautiful because she has genius,
And all the more insignificant as it has an abundant nest. You have to say :
The woman is not responsible for the uterus she carries while bleeding and is
Not obliged to use it to satisfy the spermatic fantasies
Of his companion nor to satisfy the societal needs in labor power
Or war. It must be said: the child is a prison for the female soul, and one
Sufficiency for its virtualities, the constant care it requires
More often his genitor of vocations more noble, more exalting, and especially
More meritorious. It must be said: since time immemorial, it is too much
Often because of the burden of the child that the woman misses
Of his higher faculties. We must dare to say: the woman who procreates
Accomplishes nothing but his animality and does not deserve more praise
A cat that offers her breasts or a monkey attentive to her cubs.
We must dare to say: the greatness of woman lies in her heart and in her
Intellect, in no way in its placenta. We must dare to shout: to the devil
Shrinking, inethics, unsightly, criminal, superfluous
Amniotic delusions! One must dare to proclaim that the height of machismo is
To celebrate the "touching" maternal woman, and that the supreme
Phallocrate is to praise the "tender instinct" of the young girls
Whose hymen they perforate and suck the nipples; You must dare to break
And grind the frimousse to these ithyphallic baboons who claim that
For "holy vocation" to perpetuate the horde, while
Their tartuffoid penis to embrace it. We must constantly remind ourselves that the Feast
Of the Mothers was instituted by right-wing and right-wing purulences.
It must be said and reiterated that nothing ever
Nazism and Fascism! We must dare to lyrically say: symbolic figures
Like Athena, Maat, Seshat, Kuan-yin and the Muses are the true future
Of the woman, define its real magnitude: opulent in Soul, superabundant
In Knowledge, bold in Logos, munificent in Talents, prodigal in Truths,
Sensuality complicit, generous in civilizing virtues, ethical and
Redemption, but haughtily barren of the belly, not wishing in any
Compromise with the monstrous fecundity of Gaia or with the humiliation
Delivery, suckling or rump removal ... You have to dare
That which delights us, which exalts us, which forces our respect,
They are hardly the breeders, it is the women who engage in
Art, science, literature, politics, religion,
Culture, academic life, medicine,
Humanitarian, in the paths of justice, in ecological militancy,
In spirituality, in philosophical activity or in the maquis of
The transmutative revolt, in short, in all the areas where the human being finds
To transcend itself and to deploy its noetic and chivalrous qualities. he
Mother's Day as Father's Day and replace them with the
Feast of Creators and Creators, by the Feast of Heroines and Heroes
Humanists, through the Festival of Women and Men of High Compassion and
Aristocratic generosity, for there is no doubt that

It is not to the number of his children

That we judge the human but only
To the number of his works and his benefits.

In order to achieve such a Copernican revolution in our

Women, in order to stop implicitly reducing it to its
And nursing, exposing it to our underground hatred of
Creatures born and dissatisfied with being born, it is a question of allowing the woman,
All over the world, to escape from the role in which the phallophorus
Endeavors to confine it, that is to say, it is a question of allowing it access,
Unconditionally and without delay, to the treasures of education, to schooling
Extended for as long as it considers it necessary to ensure
Destined to be otherwise enriching than that of trainer of toddlers, and,
Consequently, give him the opportunity to embark on a career
Rewarding, comforting and psychologically remunerative!

There are three essential elements here:

1. All studies analyzing the fluctuations in the fertility rate
Population shows that it is never as low as in
Individuals with extensive intellectual and cultural training:
For short, the academics show themselves infinitely less populators
Than the illiterate! As if there was an immediate and objectifiable relationship
Between intellectual softness and fertility as well as between superior discernment
And contempt for childbirth (which for our part we have never
doubt)…

2. Observers also note that the rich, paradoxically,

Fashioned less juvenile prey than the indigent: "Nothing
The beggars ", already deplored Diderot ... And for good reason, the child rises, in
The very essence of the desire that molds it, as a remedy for all the frustrations,
Including pecuniary claims. The child consoles everything, and above all poverty.
It is therefore a question of reducing the need for consolation in the maximum number of
individuals! And thus to distribute wealth in favor of the human category which
Is most often private: the woman!

3. Finally, other statistics, no less eloquent, reveal that where

The woman enjoys maximum freedom as well as a certain ease
The economic freedom won by this unbounded freedom, it chooses
To have little or no children, preferring in
Quality with Quantity (first movement towards Agathogenism), and above all
Opting for other paths of development than that of banal puerivome.

It is within this framework that we begin this chapter by asserting

That feminism is called upon to play a crucial role in the fight against
Fertility: this seems obvious if one accepts that the main horses
Of the feminist current are precisely the right to the best
Schooling, a motivating work life and free will
In any existential sphere.

There can therefore be no doubt that urgent

Feminist struggles throughout the world and to actively support all
Initiatives by which women intend to reappropriate their destiny;
Activism all the more necessary because it would be very wrong to believe
Triumph of feminism: more than three quarters of
Planet, woman remains the sexual, reproductive and domestic object of the male;
In most developing countries, the girl child, through a
Deliberate social aberration, is systematically less educated than
The boy and has, so to speak, no other future than that imposed on him,
Know, singer, over and over again, the heartbreaking maternal pattern …

In the West itself, not only is wage equality between men and women
Women is still far from being acquired, but the gossips are still
Who engage on paths which the masculine wishes to reserve for themselves; by
Moreover, the erotic license of emancipated women continues to be
Of jealous reproaches, while congratulations persist to rain
Much more on the docile mother of the family than on the nulliferous amazon! We
If the battle seems to have been won on the legal and axiological level,
Is hardly the same in terms of mentality.

As a recap: knowing that a frustrated woman is a woman

Who will seek in the child a cure for his frustrations, knowing that
Woman who has intellectual tools and finds to flourish psychically
Outside the home is a woman who gives birth little or not at all, knowing
That a woman who can freely choose the number of pregnancies opts for
More often for a very small number of children to whom it is possible
To ensure quality training and existence, anti-natalism does not
Feminists when they struggle with the
Energetically against any form of domination of the masculine over the feminine
And militate for the inalienable right to contraception, abortion,
Saphism, celibacy, libertinism, erotic completeness, free choice
Of a career, as well as the refusal to give birth to a new being if they
To a higher destiny than that of an incubator
To bring out a chick that is quite unsightly!

In the same way, the most feminist feminists will be complemented by repeated ovations
Progressives who do not deprive themselves of proclaiming that a woman is never
As a woman as she is to achieve fullness without recourse to
Trivial faux-fleeing of motherhood!

Feminist heroines had understood this very often

Proof of the most etiolated fertility; Thus Virginia Woolf drew up
Already this observation:

"It is significant that, of the four great novelists, - Jane

 Austen, Emily Brontë, Charlotte Brontë, George Eliot - none
Had children, and two remained unmarried. "

Is it an insipid, a tenebrous mother of a belly of infants who

Veneration or a woman of heliacal
Superlative human magnitude? Let us rather believe that our fervor is
On immortal gleams such as Hildegarde de Bingen, Joan of Arc,
Vittoria Colonna, Therese d'Avila, Louise Labé, Gaspara Stampa, Aphra
Behn, Ann Radcliffe, Jane Austen, Caroline von Günderode, Annette von
Droste-Hülshoff, Emily Brontë, Florence Nightingale, Louise Michel, Emily
Dickinson, Christina Rossetti, Selma Lagerlöf, Lou Andreas-Salomé, Edith
Wharton, Camille Claudel, Gertrude Stein, Renée Vivien, Virginia Woolf,
Nelly Sachs, Ivy Compton-Burnett, Dora Carrington, Dorothy Parker,
Anaïs Nin, Marguerite Yourcenar, Hannah Arendt, Frida Kahlo, Simone
Beauvoir, Simone Weil, Etty Hillesum, Patricia Highsmith, Diane Fossey,
Kate Millett, Valérie Valère and the dazzling Sarah Kane: all
Nulliparous but all so marvelously fertile in art, clairvoyance,
Insurrection, verb, benevolence or cerebral!

There is no doubt that a birth was never a source of glory;

The obstetric "exploit" remains within the range of the most flabby mole. We guess
That the woman to come, if offered the full choice, will have more
A taste for spiritual conquests as well as placental easements …

Pretending that women perform their femininity only in maternity

Sounds as stupid as to maintain that man does not apotheosis his manhood
In intravaginal ejaculation. In these processes, both
Accomplish nothing but their bestiality and prove but one thing:
Their lamentable submission to the laws of instinct. The woman does not
Femininity in childbirth, nor does a man express his masculinity in
Continuous flow, as in a species of perpetual gravity,
sperm. In the end, nothing is less feminine, since nothing is more
Female, than to reduce to the rank of mare by making use of her uterus; of
That nothing is less masculine, since nothing is more male than
To the rank of grotesque stallion by using his penis to make
Of malodorous foals. Only metabiological, spiritual and
Intellectual, make us humanly remarkable, and those alone
Confer upon the woman the aura of estimability which she rightly claims.

Let us therefore cease to enclose the most peaceful half of humanity

In the straitjacket of the maternal cliche of which she no longer wants to!

As an illustration of this thesis, we refer the reader to

Appendix II, containing some oracles of genuine women
Prophetic in their disdain for maternity.

We shall only retain here this scintillating apology for abortion:

In our overcrowded societies, and where, for the majority of

Humanity, misery and ignorance prevail, I believe
To stop a life in its beginnings than to allow it to develop in
Conditions.
- Marguerite Yourcenar, The Open Eyes.
France, 20th century

To take into account such voices that would dare to doubt that depopulation
Will pass first and foremost through feminism? The more a woman gains autonomy,
The more his dissatisfactions regress; More regressed its dissatisfactions, more
Its matrix compensation needs. Salvation lies in
The free flowering of the feminine in all the gratifying fields of
The existence ... or does not reside anywhere.

Free, defrauded, accomplished, sailing to the superior strata of the human,

The woman will no longer see any interest in plunging a new being into the brambles
Of becoming.

- But life is not so painful as that," a young girl suddenly protested.

Sickness of child.
- But then the life of a housewife, under the tutelage of a male, among the
Entertaining domestic chores, is also not so painful as that, he replies
The factitious philalèthe ...

This mischievousness sparkles richer implications than it seems. Indeed,

Childhood will be part of the logical continuation of Feminism: the point
Ethical support (ie, the full rejection of harm to others)
Allowed women to begin to free themselves from the despotic desires of the
Male is identical to the one that will free the non-existent from the chore to come to
World to satisfy the dictatorial whims of his parents!

The Convention on the Rights of the Child is emerging as a gigantic

Not in that direction and few years will pass before the spirits
The most enlightened admit that the primary right of every child is to
To be born, knowing that his birth has no other function than
To satisfy needs that do not concern him!

In short: either we make sure that the liberation of the Child is born
In the wake of that of the Woman, or we must resign ourselves to this
That only the arbitrary morality of the strongest (the male, the parents, the moloch
Social) structures human relations …

To Feminism will succeed Enfantisme:

The fall of a bastille
Calls for the abolition of other bastilles.

Posture xi
In Praise of Adoption

And there are people, many people who, in a society incapable of

To give to all her children the bread and the happiness which she owes them,
Increase the number of unfortunate
By increasing the number of human beings.
 - Octave Mirbeau, "Depopulation"
In Le Journal, December 23, 1900. France, Twentieth century.

No better than the famous Thales of Miletus, one of the Seven Sages, often
Considered to be the very first father of Western philosophy,
Can introduce us to this chapter; Let's listen to what Diogenes reveals
Laërce:

He remained a bachelor, but adopted his sister's son. When we

Asked him why he did not have children, he replied:
"Precisely for the love of children."

Yes: do not give birth for love of children!

From the dawn of Wisdom, the tone, the bellow rather, is thus given: the
Cruelty teaches to make creatures; The kindness to adopt! More than one
Slap: a regular edging.

Do not give birth for love …

Epictetus, in good boxer, will assimilate this lesson, he who will not take wife
Towards the end of her life so that she could help him to educate the orphan he had just
collect. It is understood that the integral philosopher does not generate: he saves.

Once again, Athena offers itself in a paradigm of this attitude

Soteriological: let us revisit the founding myth.

Hephaestus, in pure symbol of the primary male, impatient of descent,

Had wanted to violate the goddess of the Sapience, forgetting without doubt how much
Was already very aware of the techniques of self-defense that would not disavow
Not a modern feminist, and had failed. The liquor, however, of the butor
(Obviously suffering from premature ejaculation, such as
Of fools who promulgate fathers to forget that they are bad lovers)
Reached the thigh of the protector of the philosophers, whose disgust propelled,
With a backhand, sperm on the Earth. The hideous Gaia asked for it
Not so much to give a new proof of its neurotic fertility:
This attempt of rape was born the unfortunate Erichthonios, son of a residue of
Stupor and irresponsible clay, as evidenced by its significant
Tail of reptile. We know the continuation, the heroine with the big heart will take in
The "sans-parents" and will respect him as if he had been his own son if
Although the latter will become king of Athens, whose population will build him
A temple adjoining, on the Acropolis, that of his adoptive mother: Athena …

It may not be too early, after several millennia of digestion, to

Begin to question the meaning of this myth
Of Erichthonios by Athena ": the nyctalope Wisdom would enjoin us from
To first provide our care to the children sown by the blind Instinct rather
Than to yield to the barbarity of making more and more?

Let's confess the answer to a Russian mystagogue:

Instead of contracting marriage in order to procreate childish lives,

Would be much simpler to support and save these millions of
Childish lives that perish around us for want of food.
A Christian could not contract marriage without the consciousness of a
Fall and a sin only in the event that he would see and know that life
Of all existing children is insured.
- Léon Tolstoï, Postface for "La Sonate
In Kreutzer ". Russia, Twentieth century.

How can one conceal his approval of such statements?

The blow this time, fiercely, on the proboscide of the populators

Vaticanophiles: according to Tolstoy, it is not at all Christian to procreate; the
Christianity consists in alleviating the misery of the already-living,
To waste the best part of his energy to weigh down the land of living
supererogatory. In fact, Christ tended more to look after the children
Sick than to throw a handful of more in the mouth of the Prince of
World…

Unanimously, it seems, the highest spirituality throws us this word

Irrefutable:

Therefore,
You will fulfill your "childish desire"
And relieve distress
Instead of engendering a new one!

- But this child will not be the flesh of my flesh, protest a vague umbilicus
Ubumorph!
- So that was it!" Pestilentiel confession: the child is for you only one way
To satisfy your philotic whims, that a well of blood
Demonic, your alienating, sado-narcissism. Foin, Yahoos, of your deplorable
"I": if you have for genuine design, according to your proclamations also
Grandiloquent, to procure the "happiness of living" at a
Young creature, loved for herself, and not to remedy (far from us this
Suspicion) to your mock frustrations, you will be satisfied with the
Joys of adoption! Prove to us, gentlemen,
Gentlemen of the pullulators, that your desire exceeds the circumference of
Your navel and we will probably begin to contemplate you a little
Less guillotined.

To believe you "like children", but then what are you waiting for
To fly to the aid of those who already exist, and who suffer from it? The mass
Of orphans immediately adopted amounts to millions! The plethora
Of children in distress amounts to tens of millions! The multitude of children
In suffering amounts to hundreds of millions! The Children's Galaxy
Dramatically poor surpasses the billion! And you would have the nerve to
Not opt for adoption?

Whether you choose to procreate rather than adopt us demonstrates

Better than any syllogism how much you really love only children
Which squirt from your miserable crotch. The others are indifferent to you
Flies, and it's like flies that they die with your Adipose indifference. Foul progenitors, you would
never know enough about you
Crush the face in the manure of your guilt! It is absolute: you
Knowingly multiply suffering instead of contributing to the
Simple gesture that consoles. Structurally, the SS did nothing
Worst.

You are all the more inexcusable because there is a substitute

From the most convenient to physical adoption: Sponsorship. Know that it
"Happiness of life" can be offered to a child without
Or even assume the presence at your side ... How? All
Simply by donating to a child of the Third or Fourth World, by the
Reliable charities, a certain amount of money,
For example, that you would have cost your own carpet: that is, between
250 and 500 euros per month ... Or by the regular payment of an obol
To organizations that promote the child, its rights, its respect,
Of his blossoming, if not of his recovery when he was ripped off, more or
Less in time, the claws of his parental executioners ...

We do not doubt that this type of "distance adoption" will satisfy

Your wonderful need to confer the joy of existing to a juvenile soul ...
Is not this an infallible test to measure the generosity
The aspirants to parenthood? Nevertheless, when it is known that millions
Of orphans are only waiting for the love of which so many procreative
Listen, overflow, how to explain that the orphanages, too,
Overflowing? Why then, if parenthood proclaims itself less narcissistic
Altruistic and ultimately aims only at the sacred good of the Child, so little
Parents opt for adoption? An altruism which does not renounce to inflict
Existence hardly deserves the name of altruism.

Prove to us, natalists, your philanthropy, prove us, pupils,

Your faculties of compassion: in adoption crystallizes the extreme point of
Benevolence and giving. In fact, by procreating rather than adopting, you
Lose credibility: the misery of others leaves you with ice, only you
Import your own enjoyment, only you worry about satiating on the child
Your fantasies, only moves you, maniacs of the Property, the falling toy
Of your greedy bowels …

A sudden astonishment amazes us: the existence, for the candidates

Adoption, of a very formal "Procedure of Accreditation". Yes, the legislator
Requires that they submit to a series of interviews, with assistants
Social workers and psychologists, whose objective is to "ensure that those
Who want to adopt offer family, educational and psychological abilities
Necessary for the reception of a child already born "(Florence Lafond, L'Adoption.
France, 1999)!

Notwithstanding the relevance of such a measure, it reveals, in

Our societies, an obvious misology, a refusal of reasoning confining
Pathological: the competences and motivations of individuals,
Obviously magnanimous, who come to the rescue of a child already
Plunged into hell to exist but the most malicious cretins holds the
Absolute right to plunge into this hell as many non-existent as he wishes,
Without providing any justification either for its competences or for its
Motivations! Absurd, let us roar, absurd to the point of being obscene.

This Procedure of Accreditation also imposes on the applicants a salutary time

Reflection about the nature of their desire, a distance from
To their founding envy: is reality not likely to disappoint their dreams?
Will the adopted child be compatible with his representation? What are
The stakes involved in caring for a child? Will we have the skills
Required to undertake such a project?

So many refinements, meditations and demystifications that one

Never imposes on baby makers! Consequence of this incomprehensible
Laxity: ribambelles of incompetent parents and the series of children
To be adopted by adoptive parents.
Tested the abilities! Cretinissime, let us roar, cretinissime to the point of
Be vomiting.

It goes without saying that our project of agathogenism claims solemnly

Such an "Accreditation Procedure" be extended to all adoptive parents
Or biological! If the "license to adopt" does not shock anyone, how
Is the mere concept of "procreative license" offensive to all
World?

Eternal misrepresentation of essentialists: to believe that Instinct will do.

The case of Auschwitz perhaps, that of the children surely not: the "facts
Various "prove it day after day, brimade after brimade, tear after
Tear, in any season.

Other elements related to this theme attract our suspicious

Attention: for example, the minimum age required to enjoy the right to Adoption.
In France, this temporal criterion is fixed at 28 years for singles or couples
Married for less than two years. If it is forbidden to adopt
Reached the reasonable maturity of the 28 years, it stands in the unbelievable
Procreation be authorized at any age, from 12 or 13 years if such a
The whim of amateurs of toys! Dazzling observation: according to the legislation,
Engender requires much less experience, discernment and
Sagacity to adopt ... Who do they mock? Why do we impose less
Of constraints to the criminal than to the beautiful soul? Nausea.

Another indication of how little interest the child has

That he was opposed to that of his biological family: the protocol in force for
Adoption obliges a child over thirteen (twelve in Belgium) to
Give personal consent to the taking of care by adoptive parents; in
All logic it would be advisable to question each publisher about his desire to
The pact that binds him in spite of himself to his diabolical parents by the
blood. Are we quite sure that no child, o fugues, wishes to leave
As soon as possible, the familiar family shackles where misfortune wanted him to be born? We
Did not consult him before throwing him on the ground, it would be necessary to consult him as
soon as possible on his will to remain with his wretched "burghers"!

- Are you happy with your parents?

- No.
- Console yourself: we will remove you from their hold and look for a family
Adoptive qualified!

The possibility of such a simple exchange of words would divide the

Psychoneuroses and attempted suicide in adolescents …

The desire for a child, however strong it may be, does not confer a right to the child.
[...] The only right is that of the child to live in the family
That will best meet its needs.
- Florence Lafond, L'Adoption. France, 20th century

Diamondback. Let us draw the conclusions! Limits and requirements

Governing Adoption prefigure those that will govern the procreation tomorrow:
It is felt at work, in the primacy accorded to the best interests of the Child,
Agathogenism that our societies will not be able to
Still refuse to take into account.

Be that as it may, nothing is more noble than

To adopt a child in distress or nothing more vile than to
An unhappy one more.

In Posture VII on Surpollupopulation we said:

Before thinking of increasing their numbers,
First of all to ensure the happiness of all humans!
Do you approve of me? So why do you give birth?

Do not ask me why I did not marry.

Abstained from pity for the children I might have had.
- Arthur Schopenhauer, Interview with Challemel-Lacour.
Germany, 19th century

Athena adopting Erichthonios:

 Paradigm of only acceptable parenting ...

Posture xii
Caudal Considerations

a. Strike of the Procreation.

Instead of letting us approach, we would shirk.

They would soon have concluded peace, believe me!
- Aristophanes, Lysistrata. Greece, Fifth Century. AD

The perpetuation of a global system based on precariousness

And injustice. Women, will we be in solidarity?
We have the power not to repeat what we did
Generations of Women: Rebuilding
A world half destroyed to see it destroy again,
Rebuilding children to be killed or kill.
- Gisèle Halimi (presented and coordinated by), The Joint Program
Women. France, 20th century
.
It is scandalized that the alterglobalists, yet so
Ethics and so eager to act revolutionarily, do not have
The idea of a Worldwide Procreation Strike: what is the
Weapon yet! The most powerful political weapon imaginable,
More stunning than money or violence, since it would be here
The very essence of politics, the human person, who would evade
instrumentalization. How can politicians and financiers be bent if not
By depriving them of their very substance: voters and exploiters?

This is the ultimate rebellion: to refuse to give children to a

Which will turn them into fuel for its own benefit! Matrix ... You
Will not manufacture new workers, new workers for a
Wage of misery; You will no longer give the States new citizens whose
Taxes will be used to finance missiles and oppressions; You, the heroes of
Refusal, you will begin by refusing your offspring to endure a world
Which you yourself no longer tolerate. Where injustice extends its hegemony, there is no
Has no place for a crib!

Stop procreating. Here is the supreme rebellion: one can no longer

Peaceful, we can no longer be more effective, we can not be more intransigent, we
Can be more convincing. But will you have the courage of such a rebellion? Or
Will you accept to offer new prey to triumphant capitalism?
But our children will help change the world, you will exculpate.
Hypocrites! Well, no, this filthy world, it must change before
Bequeath it to your posterity: for millennia the pretext of
Tomorrows that chirp, there is no longer time to wait, it is no longer decent
To place the task of your descendants in the hands of your descendants, and
You alone! Or you succeed in shaping the planetary society to the image
Of your hopes of Equity, Fraternity and Solidarity, or you
Refrain from throwing new alive people into a world that you
Hideous and unbearable title!

Here comes the time to show you consistently with yourself and
With your ideals: your children will neither be the tools of your revolt nor the
Multinationals: they will be born in a free, fair and inclusive world.
Pacified by your own struggle, or else will not be born!

Discontented from all continents, it is urgent to meditate

The following suggestion: in order to check the tyranny of the
Production, boycott reproduction! Trade unionists, do not practice
More work disruption, further push your subversion: practice
"At the end" the termination of pregnancy! So launch the watchword of a
General strike of the Procreation until the multinationals and their
Governments, are complying with the need for redistribution
Wealth, and respect for the law, not only of workers, but
All humans. What is the main obsession of the industrialists? Not
Have an abundant labor force that they can suck, with
Work, marrow: threaten them no longer to reproduce you, proletarians,
Oppressed, insurgent, idealist, ecologist and alterglobalist of all
Countries, and you will soon see the bosses bend to all your demands
Wage increase, to all your demands for quality
Life, the environment and human dignity! Enough of logorrhea,
Slogans, posters, verbal protests, media gatherings
And demonstrations without tomorrow! Instead, use the absolute power
You control: the rejection of all fertility until the
Socio-economic structures are metamorphosed to the extent
Your aspirations! Now practice blackmail against those who
Enslave you by making your belly sing …

The Aristophanes Lysistratus had already opened the way

The Roman women will radicalize, they who refused to generate
Children with the intention of asserting one of their rights violated. Evidence of
The incomparable efficacy of such abstinence, the feast of Car-
Instituted to commemorate the victory over the prevaricators.
Let us note that the tutelary goddess of this revolt, Carmenta, is
The prophetic song lets once again glimpse the true liberation:
As prolific in the Word as parsimony in Uterus, certain traditions
Will hold this very oracular deity as a nulliver ...

Yes, Anti-Natalism can become an instrument, incredibly

Modern, political struggle!

Brand the highest threat: pledge, petitions, appeal

Launched solemnly to all the crushed of the Earth, not to make any more children
For a year, as a warning, and if at the end of the
Deliberate sterility has produced no change, if horror and inequity
Continue to proliferate, extend your
All the more so until the multinationals
Juveniles), and their obsequious accomplices, the governments, finally
The right decisions and gave all humans the conditions for access to
Happiness, serenity, safety, health, material well-being, in short,
Enjoyment of existence they deserve.

Do not say any more: "we can do nothing"; You can do everything: just do not
More begotten new victims, new slaves! In fact, if the
Misery has been perpetuated to the present day, it is because it has always
Cowards to perpetuate themselves in a world that hardly deserves
Perpetuate!

A Worldwide Procreation Strike ... Imagine the Scope

Symbolic of such a commitment, imagine its power of media impact,
Imagine the crisis, the scandal, the shock, the global debate that it would provoke,
finally ! Imagine, above all, the reforms which it could not fail to provoke,
For the benefit of all! Imagine …

Dare to say: we do not want such a world for our children and we
Will not give children to such a world! This is the ultimate Subversion.
What are you waiting for to walk in the sun of such Subversion?

Contrary to appearances, this idea of blackmailing fertility is not

Certainly not so ridiculous, so unrealistic, since Finnish students
In April 2002, decided not to do any more.
Children as long as a nuclear power plant project in their region is not
abandoned. 850 people signed a letter to the Finnish Parliament
Stipulating that "one should not have children in a world that is not safe"
(Sic) and specifying that this moratorium on procreation would continue during the
Less 4 years. If these admirable students have the courage to prolong,
In their extreme implications, their judicious reflection, they will renounce
No doubt, atomic reactor or not, to any uterine drive, knowing
That our world, by its very nature, is truly everything, except sure ...

"You should not have children

In a world that is not safe ".
Maxime to put on the lintel of any maternity.
And even more: of every athenaeum!

We reaffirm it: in its present state, the world being more and more
Unbearable, impossible to assume in the multiplication of the carcans that
Founded, there is no reason, for the authentic holders of the Ethics,
To throw creatures there that have no other status than that of machine tool
At the service of the Western economy …

Insubordinate, do not sacrifice your children,

Sacrifice your childish desire!

b. Disadvantages inherent in the Engenderment.

In my opinion, you should not have children,

Because I observe in having children
A lot of considerable risks and a lot of worries,
 For a low yield, and without consistency or value.
- Democritus, Fragments. Greece, F
Century. AD
The children console us with all the sorrows ...
Waiting for the appalling
Which they will not fail to give us.
- Jules Barbey of Aurevilly,
Thoughts detached. France, 19th century

By an unctuous irony, many, once become parents, having in

Appearance fulfilled their "dream", constantly complain about the heaviness
Of the task: they unfortunately come to discover that the Real Child is with the Child
Imaginary what the toad is to the swan ... An overwhelming disappointment.

It shouts, it shit, it wiggles, it screams again, it eats like a goret,

It wiggles its villainous head and salivous, it wants to play, it harasses, it
Questions, creeps, runs everywhere, it spills, it destroys, it stumbles,
It breaks the face, it cries, it falls ill, it repleases, it grows from
Through, it gets hurt, it fails at school, it does not want to study, it fights, it
Jealous, that joke-of-bad taste, it rebels in adolescence, that acne,
It's depressing, it goes out with anyone, it has bad connections, it
Talks about suicide, it goes to the act, it addiction, it runs away, it is found
Unemployment, it conforms, it decrochidiotemploit, it overmoulds, it
Accident-of-car, it gets married, it does not want to see you anymore, it's bothering
Family meal, it happens again, and then it dies of cancer
Before you have served as an old-age stick: was it really good
Business?

"Even with two we do not have time to do everything. And then, take care of
Of a child can be more tiring than going to work. "
- About Young Populators (reproduced in Victor,
Weekly supplement to the newspaper Le Soir, 30 May 2003).

Devil ! What a convict's activity! Child: promise less pleasure

Than vital exhaustion. An elegant philosopher has been able to
Note that the birth of the children signed the death of the parents …

It is impossible to list all the hassles, tensions and

The chores imposed by having to educate a juvenile creature,
To take charge of the infinite of its intrinsic deficiencies, to transmit to it
The gigantic luggage, the elephantous keychain, which will enable it to
- perhaps - to confront the atrocities of life without leaving it too quickly
The best irises of his conscience, but it is sufficient to
Focus on the child as a clandestine on the path to achieving the most
To discredit them in the eyes of all those for whom
Zarathustra, existence is primarily the place of personal heroism
And a radical surpassing of oneself!

To procreate is not only to alienate the child, it is to alienate one's own

Virtualities! It is ruining oneself in a flood of subordinate, petty tasks,
Trivial, exasperating, bestial even, since it's take charge of nothing
Less than a new body. As for the education of the young soul, what wound
Than to have to inculcate to him the alphabet of everything, depriving at the same time
Philosophical care which it deserves, which it claims, tenderly
Listen to it! When will we find time to "learn to die" if we
To learn to live (but is it only one's own ability to
A creature whose intellectual quotient borders on zero,
Adolescence at least? Drastic issue.

Many who thought they enjoyed their child realized that

Child is very often the very obstacle that prevents them from enjoying:
Freedom, careless massacre, temporary ogre, burden that must be everywhere
Luggage - or putting in consignment - a source of
One only departs in order to become again the exhausted servant. Dilemma :
This child who is hindering me, should I neglect him or
Vampirise the best of my youth? When weaned, I will almost
Old, harassed anyway; And if by chance he showed himself ungrateful? By
Aphrodite, may I have understood a little earlier that the child is finally
Less a voluptuousness than a constraint, a knot of dwindling obligations!

For apocryphal though it is, how not to cite in the cutting edge
Epistle of Diogenes to Zeno:

We must not marry or raise children, since our species is

And that the troubles caused by the marriage and the children
An additional burden of human weakness. That is why
Those who married and raised children for the assistance they
Hoped to find it, later realized that it still
More embarrassment and regret, when it was possible for them,
From the beginning, to avoid these errors. "
 - Pseudo-Diogenes, Letter to Zeno.
Greece, circa I century BC. AD

It can not be argued that philosophy did not

Put on alert. Democritus, from the
Century before our era, nailed the impulse
Parental to the gibbet of an alternative as depressing as without exit:

"Raising children is difficult: succeeding in this

Fighting and caring, failure to do so brings grief
equal. "

The heroin breeders, thugs, delinquents,

Psychotic, inadequate or anorexic know something …

Another major disqualification: procreation renders the woman unlawful, not

Only morally, but above all physically: the gravidity transforms
The juvenile and radiant fairy in dull and tired housewife. How much
Women who have become mothers did not grind their teeth under the nostalgia of
Their bodies, their sex, their thighs, their buttocks, their breasts of pre-fencing
? The child destroys the girl, without pity, almost without remedy, for
He always wrinkles it, he ages it, he tames it, under the scourge of his needs and the pestle
Of its reactivities, prematurely.

Even worse: getting pregnant is not just suicide

Cosmetic, but also, often, erotic decay. How many
Of broodstock will they not admit to you they attended, impotent, to the bankruptcy
Libidinal relationship of their couple as soon as the birth of the first child? How many
Did not they hate their child clandestinely because they
Had "torn", destroying in passing, immanent zorro, the vulva which
Expelled to hell? Besides sadism, is not there a furious masochism
To become a mother?

Hence this question, which, not without violence, is now posed to women:
What is the point of freeing oneself from man if one consents to remain a slave to the child,
"This monster that adults make with their regrets"? The time is not right
Come from a second, from a definitive, emancipation from woman? Is it
No time to abandon to the less than human mammals the so-called
"The joys of mothering", patriarchal myth, if any? Or let the males
In need of moutards to fend for themselves with the insignificant posterity which
Sometimes results from our miserable sexuality of primates?

Existence, in its truly human dimension, aspires to the Magnitude,

To the Out-of-the-agreed Spark; That's why we hammer him: all
Woman deserves a thousand times better than a shrinking mother's destiny!

Incidentally (to the extent that the argument affects only one
Of the population), parental
The radical enemy of Dandyism, the antithesis of all aristocratic
The summits of his being, towards the excellence of the Self: how to remain vertical
Before a creature whose immense lit-
Bends and lowers to breastfeed his parasitism? Paradigm of everything
Degradation, procreation metamorphoses any disability benefit
More or less definitive. There is nothing in man but a descent
Will make …

In a hundred evils as in a thousand,

The child being a fall that tends to hinder
Any higher existential fulfillment,
Do not we, too,
To let it rest in the Nothingness?
How much for wanting to give life
Have missed out on their own lives?

c. Parents already dragged into Justice.

States Parties shall take all legislative, administrative and social measures
And educational measures to protect the child from all forms of violence,
Physical or mental abuse or neglect,
Abuse or exploitation, including sexual violence,
While in the custody of his parents.
- Convention on the Rights of the Child.
 (United Nations, 20 November 1989)
Maltreatment is also in words.

Not providing a child with everything he or she needs

To grow up, which he will need to have access to one day
To the condition of a free and responsible man, is a maltreatment.
- Pierre Lassus, Childhood sacrificed.
Child Maltreatment and the
Efforts to combat it. France, 20th century

We shall not mention here, of course, the condemnations of

The spawners whose harmfulness leaves no room for doubt in the judgment
(Rapist parents, rape parents, kidnapper parents, etc.), but
The accusations of negligent breeders or
Not very deficient, because there is a truly new fact, the index of a
A latent revolution in the way we understand homework - now
More emphasized than the rights - of parents to their children.
Let's see.

An Italian teenager with severe pulmonary

Decided to lodge a complaint against his father, an inveterate smoker. It requires,
In addition to damages, a measure of removal from the
family house.
- Source: Le Soir, 5 June 2001.

In Honduras, the authorities are considering allowing children

Bizarre or humiliating names to pursue their
Parents for making life impossible for them ...
- Source: Le Soir, 9 October 2000.

Bet that these first two examples alone will inspire many
Teenagers struggling with defective progenitors! An obvious tropism
Of the law develops in favor of the younger generations. Proof :

In the United Kingdom, according to recent legislation, parents

The children practice too much school absenteeism,
Or simply behave poorly in class, are now
Severe fines and prison sentences! Rationale for the
Minister of Education: "The idea is that parents
 Their responsibilities with regard to the conduct of
Their children ".
- Source: Le Soir, 2 April 2002 and 15 May 2002.

A British mother, incapable of preventing her two

Daughters to practice truant, was accordingly condemned
To two months' imprisonment. Commentary of the defendant
After his release: "I deserved what I got. Everyone has the right
Education and I deprived my daughters of their rights through my
Own stupidity ".
- Source: Le Soir, 30 May 2002.

Interesting testimony: it is therefore possible to tame the fauves

Parental measures by applying coercive measures.

Prison also for an unmarried English mother who failed

To hand over his 9-year-old son to the educational paths.
- Source: Le Soir, 2 May 2003.

Penitentiary always, but also works of general interest, for

A British father whose two children strove hard not to
to attend classes. As little docile as his descendants, the latter
Had ignored several warnings from the
Childhood and education.
- Source: Le Soir, June 18, 2003.

The Hexagon is no exception:

French Justice now sends some parents to delinquents

In "parental training" to fill their gaps in
know-educate.
- Source: Le Soir, 9 December 2002.

A 31-year-old American spent a week in prison for

Neglected to protect her two-year-old daughter and her ten-month-old twins
 Of the diurnal sun during an outdoor party,
Had given them all three a painful sunburn. The Sheriff
Justifies its decision by stating: "This sanction was not
Exaggerated: my concern is to protect children ".
- Source: Le Soir, 23 August 2002.

It would be wonderful for the judiciary to be

Intransigent with irresponsible parents: their number would undoubtedly
At a glance …

In the absence of an effective system of education or repression against

Inconsistent parents, it seems that young people are now
Redressing themselves what is twisted:

A 28-year-old Iranian, a judo virtuoso, went to her mother-in-law's house

To correct it: "I struck it so much that I broke it
arms. She deprived me of the best years of my youth
And should be punished, "said the avenger. Explanation: the
Shrug with the possessive tentacles was in fact opposed for twelve years
At the wedding of his son with the exemplar judokate ...
- Source: Le Soir, November 5, 2002.

Kafka would have appreciated, Rilke and Baudelaire no less ... More radical:

A 15-year-old German student was sentenced to five years in prison

For having killed her 69-year-old grandmother with 21 stab wounds.
He exclaims: "She irritated me with her annoying questions."
- Source: Le Soir, November 12, 2002.

Another infernal grandmother who pushes her grandson to the limit:

Did not the victim deserve the acquittal? Consolation: five years, this is
Not pay so dear his quietude. Moreover, to study in the bagno or the school,
Difference?

In the United States, two brothers, aged 13 and 14,

Their father with baseball bat (proverbial hygiene: sport
Forms youth), before burning the fire at the family home.
Sanction: 7 years imprisonment only; They had to be found
Extenuating circumstances ...
- Source: Le Soir, November 16, 2002
The reason for this patricide is unfortunately not mentioned in
The article that I have, but we can put forward the prudent assumption that
This surpollupopulator had not really succeeded in getting liked by his
offspring. Was this a tribute to Violette Nozieres? Or one
Black Humor?

In any event, the anti-parental challenge seems to

More and more springtime individuals:

Furious at being frustrated by a candy because he had committed

An error in a school exercise, a six-year-old English boy
Complained bitterly to his mother, who had the indecency to give
Reason to the teacher. Instantaneous reaction of the early justiciary: it
Grabbed the phone and trained the emergency number of the police
To demand the arrest of his mother and the teacher. "They
Were wicked. I wanted them to go to prison
What they give me the caramel ", argued the rebel of which
The subconscious probably felt, with a good sense, that
The simple fact of accomplishing the effort to exist deserves at all times a
Solid compensation!
- Source: Le Soir, 27 February 2000.

We recall our major offuscation, in posture VIII, as to

Laxity surrounding procreation.

Diplomas and licenses are required for all purposes, except for the
The most complex and the most valuable: to succeed in giving the child
Love, Care, Attention, Respect, Education and all
Good fortune to which he is entitled!

Well, it seems that this criminal paradox is on the way to finding its
Lysis:

The Parliament of Taiwan has just made mandatory for all

For marriage a family education course consisting of
Four hours of information on family management and counseling
On how to raise children.
- Source: Le Soir, January 13, 2003.
As far as civilization is concerned, it is well known that Asia often enjoys
A step ahead of the West. Four hours, however, it seems
Short: we advocate four years. Intensive.

It seems impossible to ignore the need for Agathogenic concerted. Everywhere, the Child
becomes a major concern and the Tribunals raise the tone:

The Supreme Court of Wisconsin has forbidden a man, already the father of
Nine children, to procreate more, unless the
That he could provide for the needs of all his descendants.
- Source: Le Soir, 29 November 2001.

In the same order of ideas :

An American judge prohibited pregnancy during a period of

A drug user whose addiction had
In danger the health of her baby.
- Source: Le Soir, 21 February 2000.

We are thus witnessing the gradual introduction of

"Legitimate parenting"! From year to year, legislation is hardening and
Ties of Maltreatment are tightened; All the works devoted to the
The following:

What is now perceived as psychological violence in

A child was lived, five or ten years ago,
Normal behavior of education.

Verbal assaults, systematic devaluations,

Humiliations of children, in particular regarding their level
Their physical appearance, their intellectual abilities,
In short, anything that calls into question their integrity is part of the violence
Psychological problems. They can seriously affect the state of
Health of a child or adolescent.

When the morality or health of a child is threatened, the judge

Of children can be seized.
- Pascal Vivet, Child Abuse. France, 20th century

Of course, it lies lying at the bottom of the septic tank the omnipotence of
Head of the family, once invested with the right of life or death on his offspring!
O as it approaches, the hour of accountability, that of Judgment
Ultimate…

Yes, because, as we run for the post VI,

One day to grant to any uncreated the right not to be born, or,
Fails to allow any person found injured by the existence of
Justice to those who inflicted it on her.

There is indeed no reason not to consider procreation as

A crime from the moment when a human person considers himself atrociously
Prejudiced by the simple fact of having been born on our calamitous planet.

If blind procreation remains legal,

Then all sadisms are allowed!

Most people believe

Competent to look after children.
It is urgent to put an end to this illusion.
- Pierre Lassus, Childhood sacrificed.
Child Maltreatment and the
Efforts to combat it. France, 20th century
 Ejaculation (under condoms)

I am for the extinction of the human race. [...]

This brings us back to this word of literary madness which I find admirable:
"If no one existed, everyone would be happy."
- André Blavier, Interview in Vu d'Ici
(No. 1, July 2000). Belgium, 20th century.

Conclude: an illusory task so stretched in every human reality the

Arborescences of the theme of the Procreation, nevertheless the least dissected of
All, but also, and this borders on the disturbing, the least subject to the blotoir,
Bumper, criticism …

One example among others: more probing the conflictual relationship

Man with his birth would make it possible to account for the
The almost universal taboo that weighs on nudity,
The public ostentation of the "genitories." Rationally, it seems absurd
To conceal the spontaneous fruits of our desire: breast-feeding breasts,
The penis that ejaculates, the vulva that conceives, even as war and blood,
Infinitely more obscene, spread out in the media. And yet
These organs of our enjoyment, our supreme consolation, the vast
The majority of cultures have condemned them to remain discreet, stifled
The shadow…

How to justify such a ban? On this point, the theory of

Sublimation elaborated by psychoanalysis (obliteration of the sexual to the profit
Of the cultural) seems very insufficient, for it is not at all necessary, in
To develop efficient and sustainable civilizational structures, to frustrate
More a creature whose immensity of needs and appetites constrains it,
Without visible loopholes, to generate transcendent activities, rules of
Socialization and spiritual patterns. On its own, the enormous pressure
Biological, coupled in man to an intellectual device adequately
Developed, is sufficient to produce society, culture, thought and
Spirituality: obvious adaptive advantages (thus the primitive function of
Religion was to maintain hope, the strength to live; Task now
Devoted to art, fiction, mass literature) …

In other words, even sexually satisfied - assuming that the

Unveiling of the reproductive organs leads to such satisfaction,
Which is by no means certain - even erotically sated, the human being does not
Would be led, willingly or by force, to sublimate, to transform
In culturally usable energies, his libidinal impulses always already
Unsatisfied since in essence impossible to satiate, the infinity of his desires
Forever repressed, frustrated, disappointed, by the rules themselves, by the
Rigorous limitations and insoluble requirements of life …

One suspects it, the concept of sublimation fails to explain

Fully understand the reasons for the systematic camouflage of bodily areas
To Reproduction, and above all to the incredible violence that is unleashed
Not only against the transgressors of the prohibition on nudity but
Also against the genital organs themselves, as the
Genital-traumatic practices such as circumcision, excision,
Infibulation, etc.

So why such banishment, such fierceness, such refusal

To offer to the day what, if we swear, makes us enjoy? From a point of
Anthropological view, it seems irrefragable that this need to conceal,
Censor, abolish, and visually destroy the genitalia of both sexes
Betrays nothing less than our panic anxiety, our subterranean hostility,
The instruments of the crime of which we are all the object
in the world !

If the "organs of our enjoyment" were not primarily the sources of

Our suffering, we would have no scruples to reveal them, to show them
In the face of our fellows, to use them even in public spaces. Risquons
This hypothesis: any complex, any inhibition, any neurosis, any
Psychopathology is found to have its roots the most
Deep in our detestation, as unconscious as vigorous, to have
In our genethyophobia.

If we call "parts shameful" the organs that generate

Because indeed there is enough to nourish an ineffaceable shame at the idea of committing
A mischief as hideous, as total and totalitarian, as that of begetting!

Thus, according to a process analogous to that which leads us to translate

In misogyny what actually proceeds from an unavowable metrophobia, we
Stigmatize the Sexual instead of condemning the Genital, we condemn
Libertinage and sleeping instead of suppressing fertilization and
Childbirth ... There is no need to look elsewhere for the ultimate cause of
Persecution (how to name it otherwise?) Universal of everything that
Touches on lust, orgy, debauchery, erotic frenzy, or
Pornography: all societies have been harassing themselves for millennia
To domesticate, to bridle, to chain sexuality for lack of conscious power
Understand that the real object of such a will to control is none other than the
Procreation itself!

In short, sex does not blame bad thing

Only because our existences result from it!

In this respect, it is not at all indifferent to note that the

The sexual liberation coincides exactly with the appearance and the diffusion
On large-scale contraceptive methods as reliable as the pill or
The latex condom, and that the emancipation of the woman was herself
Concomitant with this containment of involuntary fertility …

This is not without consequences, because it means that the more

Will admit, in perfect lucidity, that the real psychic stumbling to
Man is in no case sexuality but rather procreation (the taboo
Absolute, who is still pregnant demonstrates it to satiety), the more sexual repression
Erotic activities will become less guilty and will become
Serenely libertarian, which will contribute little to uncontrolling our
Presence in the world, quite painful as it is so that one does not deprive oneself of
No longer to "enjoy without hindrance", according to the injunction of a fabulous
Spring.

The progress of human well-being will be enormous when

Will embrace the idea that we must no longer repress the enjoyment, also outrageous
But the obstetric consequences of enjoyment! Any
Evidence, a swinger nulliver streaming sperm, cyprin and
Libertine lubricity is worth a thousand times better than the most chaste father of a family …

We guess, finally take into account our genethliophobia - our

Hatred of birth, our subconscious abomination of having to come to
World - and go so far as to construct it as a heuristic hypothesis,
Significant change in our view of a number of anthropological.

Thus we have been able to understand, in addition to the real

Misogyny, that the "enigma", which so intrigued Georges Devereux, of the cult
Universal of Virginity refers to nothing but a subterranean fantasy
Of generalized Nulliparity.

Compromising implication: the cult of chastity that structures the

Most religions has no other teleological ambition than to oppose
the natality !

Perpetual or temporary continuance, apology for celibacy or caging

Of woman, encratism or symbolic castration, an obsession haunts the
Spiritual and this obsession seems to hinder the Reproduction.

They say: God has children. Far be it from him that blasphemy!
(Sura 2)

They attribute daughters to God, far from his glory this blasphemy! [...]
Assimilate God to all that is highest. He is the Sage, the
powerful. (S.16)

Glory to God who has no children. (S.17)

They say: The Merciful has children. You have just pronounced
An impiety. [...] To the Merciful, it is not fitting to have a son.
(S 19)

Our Lord has neither wife nor child. (S. 72)

- Muhammad, Koran. Arabia, VIIth century.

From a genethiophobic point of view, these sentences

Islam (in that they distinctly distinguish it from Christianity) take
Suddenly an altogether decapitating sense: the Supreme Sage has no children, the
Paternity does not fit the soul capable of Mercy! Proclamâmes Us
Another thing in proportion as the present work was unwound?

To dig even more, one would come to even question the alleged
Fertility Muslim:

Children are the ornaments of worldly life; But the good

Works that have been given to your Lord a better
reward. (S.18)

It is not by your riches or by your children that you

 Place closer to God. Only those who believe and who
Practice good works which shall have the right to do so. (S 34)

Your children will be of no use to you at the day of judgment. God

Will put a barrier between you. (S 60)

Anyone who has preferred life here will have hell for dwelling.
(S. 79)
- Muhammad, Koran. Arabia, VIIth century.

Better: it would be possible, and we will do so in its own time, to

That the "Five Pillars" of Islam are structured around the Chastity-
Nulliparity …

As for Mohammedan optimism, it is sometimes found more accents

That "Cubanic"

If God wanted to punish men for their evil, he would not let
No living creature on earth. (S.16)

May the man perish! How ungrateful he is! (S 80)

I seek an asylum with God from the dawn of day against the
Wickedness of the beings he created. (S 113)
- Muhammad, Koran. Arabia, VIIth century.

Would there be a sub-text not yet dis-masked on the back of what we

Do we think we know about the religious phenomenon?

This is how we can surprise a reading grid centered on

Genobiophobia: it provides matter for metanoïa, conversion of
Interpretation, and it is perhaps not unlawful to consider
Some other important human phenomena in the light of such bias
epistemological.

Everyone will admit that there is something frightening and absurd

In the relentlessness shown by man to destroy Nature, but
Nobody asks what man is really looking for
To ravage behind Nature, our Mother ... Our Mother? This may be the
Key: if Nature were not, symbolically, our Mother, we would put
Much less eagerness to destroy it, drag it to torture,
Lead back to nothingness!

This being said in the half-pleasing, half-serious mode, the very obsession, confining
Sick, foreign to all rationality, that we have to seek to exterminate
Until the last whale, by hunting, sonars or pollution, exhale
Suspicious: would Captains Ahab be accountable to the
With their coming into the world? Would they suffer from a denial of metrophobia,
Or rather a poorly integrated genethliophobia? Almost all on the way
Extinction, elephants, rhinoceroses, hippos and turtles
Of sea, these interminable layers, would they exhibit, for their misfortune,
Forms too maternal? Thueris, in any case, the Egyptian goddess
Reserved for the parturientes, displayed an unfortunate head of hippopotamus, while
In China, the tortoise was the mythical foundation of this world where we
Only to struggle with the ten thousand pains ....

Clearly, in the same way, again, that misogyny, according to the eternal
The return of the repressed, the massacre of the environment is
Its marrow as the expression of our latent mettrophobia, an anti-natalism
Who, failing to understand himself and to admit himself in full lucidity,
Deceptively misleading.

There is a good chance that if we become aware of what

Last resort our "ecoclastomania", if we accepted to probe
Authentically our ever-problematic relationship to maternity,
We would adopt an entirely different mode of relation to this Nature which does not appear
Our enemy only because we unknowingly identify it with our mother
Biological…

In short, true ecology begins where

The foreclosure of our hatred of having been born.

And perhaps it is the same for Peace.

Who would dare to affirm that war in its tedious endemicity, in its
A crying irrationality, in its morbid compulsiveness, does not betray, too,
A metrophobia that refuses to decline its name? This flesh against which
The warriors will fight, carnage after carnage, cruelty after cruelty,
Shot after amputation, amputation after amputation (castration
After castration), eradication after eradication, perforation after perforation,
Is she not a legally murderous substitute for the Flesh-Mother? Which is
That tacit voluptuousness which seizes the man of war at the height of his fury if not
To realize on his legally exterminable enemy his infantile fantasies of
Devouring-tearing-destruction of the original flesh? No
Sadistic, in the most intimate of his impulses, does not ignore it: all Sarcophobia is
A Metrorophobia, every splinter is vengeance against the matrix, against
The very source of our gall. Like the ascetic, like the anorexic, the
Military attacks the carnal only to free oneself from the maternal.

But it is also the genethliophobia that is emerging in our passion for

Armed conflicts and their scandalous butcheries: all the battles
Whole populations squabble our occult
Fantasies of annihilation; That so many men, on the slightest pretext,
To rivet and tear each other in an iron Ragnarok
Blood sums up our hopes for collective suicide, our desire to
To deny ourselves without carrying the cross to kill ourselves: in its
War is a pact of despair in which each belligerent promises his
Similar to his providential enemy, to trick him in exchange for having
Luck, too, to lose his life …

In short, one never fights for the native soil,

We are actually fighting against the birth rate itself!

(Is it necessary to specify, for the use of the hymns of perpetual peace, that
A matter of absolute pacifism, perfect conscientious objection, anti-natalism
Does not defend badly at all? No peace deeper than that of nothingness.)

In the end, the concept of "death instinct" means nothing if one does not
Postulates as a principle and foundation a genethliophobia common to
All sentient creatures, which amounts to saying: suffering ... Wanting
To die is above all to wish never to be born. Thus, the will-to-die
Is it never a project, but always a nostalgia.

Some will prefer to see in these cogitations only a picturesque

Intellectual entertainment: they will be wrong, because to neglect to undertake
Psychoanalysis of our social behaviors (and we know if Freud
And Jung, by themselves, gave us all the means), it is to be feared
That we continue to shift our resentment toward victims who
But ... We believe it is relevant to say that the re-examination
Of our relationship to childbirth, there is no salvation for the human species:
They will continue to multiply the problems it suffers for lack of daring
Face, and worked to solve, the only problem that makes
Suffering rather than nothing …

Humanity is doing everything it can (and more) to bring

As soon as possible, its self-destruction.
- Hubert Reeves, The Hour to get drunk. Quebec, Twentieth century.

Perhaps she thinks herself badly born? Perhaps it does not have the
Choice between peaceful extinction, freely consented, and extermination
By thermonuclear bombs interposed, if not by legions of robots
Triumphant ... Unless you start procreating according to Wisdom?

It did not seem to us entirely superfluous to open up such

Reflection before taking leave of our reader. Impossible for the hour
To venture into other auscultations, but at the end of this tickling
Rosary of philosophers, we nevertheless maintain the hope of having
Established the validity of the following points:

1. The fundamental identity between existence and suffering.

2. The ethical illegitimacy of the procreative will.

3. Absolute absence of virtues behind the mask of childish desire, all baby
Born only to fill the existential gaps of its parents.

4. The impossibility of philosophically or metaphysically justifying this

desire.

5. The facticity of the affection we bear to our parents, only the interest and
The need attaching us to them.

6. The Importance of Allowing a Human Being Unhappy

To claim compensation, at least symbolic, from those who propelled it
In the brambles of our world.

7. The duty to work without delay to improve the candidates for parenthood
If we wish to put an end to it once and for all with the alienation of the Child.

8. The need to promote adoption at the expense of Reproduction,

Financial incentives.

9. No denaturing is conceivable without an absolute victory of feminism;

So the future will see rising generations of women much more creative
Than procreative.

10. True fecundity is spiritual and not carnal;

Only by the psychic fertility that man is distinguished from the animal.

11. Brand the threat of a "Worldwide Procreation Strike" is the

More alterglobalists available. To make use of it would
Like a thunderbolt without equal in human history!

12. Last but not least, the unstoppable necessity of muzzling the Surpollupopulation
By proactive, pro-natalist policies, if not coercive. If humanity tomorrow dies out, it will be
rather for having engendered In an uncontrolled way that for having listened to the voice of the
anti-natalists ... None The protection of the environment can no longer be envisaged without An
intensive fight against fertility! Let us recall it bluntly: on our
The overpopulated population, procreation is now a crime
Against humanity!

The exceptional polythelism of the refusal to engender is welcomed in passing:

Not a problem to which, in spite of all means, it does not
Solution as consoling as definitive. Panacea? Philosophical Stone ?
Graal? Yes: anti-natalism contains the mischievous trinity.

Certainly, many will hold the improcreationism for a philosophy

Of idealists, having no chance of ever making a strain in the psyche
Collectively or significantly alter human behavior; In short, one
A stillborn thought, reserved for an aristocracy of disillusioned or lunatic,
In perpetuity devoid of any concrete application. And however…

Let us not forget that Slavery was officially abolished in France,

The country par excellence of Human Rights (!), That in 1848 and before that
Abolition, made thinkable by the assaults of the philosophers of the Enlightenment, a
Such barbarity imposed itself on all as a Economic "or as a" law of nature "or as a
"Expression of the divine will". There is reason to hope that a
Day, perhaps more distant, the Procreation, which rests exactly,
Let us remark, on the same arguments (Profit, Nature or God),
Will provoke a disgust equal to that caused in our time by slavery
And will suffer the same fate as the latter: a ranking at the level of attitudes
Excremental, and prohibited ... Unbelievers should remember that
Today's utopia often becomes the rule of tomorrow.

If it were now a matter of putting into perspective the

Manifest, we would argue that beyond its exaggerations, necessary as
Electroshock in severe cases, its practical objective remains
Only to arouse a salutary polemic as to the ethical legitimacy
Inflicting all the cruelties of existence on innocent people, but even more so
To achieve a radical awareness-empowerment of candidates
To procreation: it is now important to demystify the parental function
If it is desired to render it compatible with the performance of all its duties
Towards the Child; Nothing is more criminal than to divinize the
Incompetence does not expect so much to act without the slightest notion of
Guilt, or the slightest desire to remedy its own shortcomings,
Assassines failures ...

Hence the double question that this book promotes:

1. Do we have the right to bring children into the world?

2. And if so, under what conditions?

The answers here promulgated may not be the most appropriate, nor
More complaisant, free therefore to each one to suggest better, knowing
That Childhood was sufficiently patient and urgently required
Whose verbosity will finally prove inferior to efficiency!

We are convinced that this would be a masterful

The welfare of mankind if parents would only be endowed in the future with
Skills and maturity to offer all the keys to
Life as well as the best assets to protect it from
Which he will inevitably encounter. It is a long way from that,
Each year, 14 million girls aged 15 to 19 become
Mothers, thus passing, almost without transition, from the age of the toy to
Marmouset ... Making training in Agathogenesis mandatory, would it be
So expensive to pay the comfort of future generations?

If there was any proof that our century is ripe for a severe
Question of procreation, the following confession, published by one of the most famous
Contemporary ethologists, would deliver it to us:

We heard: "Poor child ... he smiles ... he does not know

What awaits him: I should never have brought him into the world. »30 to
40% of young mothers give this anxious interpretation.
- Boris Cyrulnik, Under the Sign of the Link. France, 20th century

Without respite, in fact, unanimously, we hear them complaining that

"Our world is horrible" and "life is hard," but then why
Do they present them to creatures who will complain of them no less than they?

It is urged: when the respect of the Child has reached its point
Culminating, we will simply cease giving it birth! In
Expectation, any other attitude towards him, any deplorable
Reach it, is only worth what is tear of gavial.

Many beautiful plumages regret that "our age lacks

Strong, committed, corrosive, revolutionary texts ": we shall see
Singers of writing to the flamethrower will reserve this modest attempt ...
But perhaps it will be too revolutionary. Or too sulphurous? Or
Perhaps she will die of prematurity? Who else will have the strength
To meditate on it? No doubt we feel the Hollywood need of works
More reassuring, so true it is that life is anything but reassuring …

To be convinced of this, let us end with a modest assortment of

It is possible to read, almost every day, in the
Any major newspaper:
With the passive complicity of his wife, condemned for nonassistance
To a person in danger, a father of a family practiced,
For more than ten years, serial rape on his four children.
One of the girls explained that he forced her to offer him blowjobs
While the mother was absent for shopping. His brother
Was placed in foster care after having also been the subject of
Sexual perversions of its genitor. In addition to these repeated rapes,
Children had to endure deprivation of food as well as stays
Punitive in the cellar.
 - Source: Le Soir, 31 May 2003.

A mother has transformed cribs into cages using

Barbed wire: she enclosed her four shoots, aged from one to
Seven, when she had to leave home. Children suffered
Malnutrition.
- Source: Le Soir, 30 August 2003.

An 18-month-old baby was deliberately smothered by her mother: she

Knew that the child was suffering from swallowing problems and forced him,
In order to kill him, to ingest two slices of dry bread. The
On the other hand suffered a calvary during the months preceding
His assassination: he was struck several times, as in
Fractures in the head and ankle, as well as
Hematoma covering his face. The parent explained that she
Wanted this second child, although she is pregnant with a
third.
- Source: Le Soir, 19 September 2003.

For a frivolous reason, a torturer father began by striking

His five-year-old son, then took him to a wood where,
Having stripped it, he flogged it with nettles. Back at home,
He forced the child to drink boiling water before he
Pour on the back. The father closed the session of torture by beating
His child, up to the blood, with a cable. The young victim will remain
Traumatized for life.
- Source: Le Soir, 7 October 2003.

What do you do (except standing still)?

On reflection, the title of this book wandered a little: we can

To dispense with the guillotining of procreators, the electric chair will also
seal the deal, or tsunami drowning if electricity is cut off.

REDUCTION

The abusive families say: "We sacrifice ourselves

To raise our children so that they become free
"We use our
 Meet our material, emotional, sexual needs ".
- Pierre Lassus, Childhood sacrificed.
Child Maltreatment and Little Effort
To fight it. France, 20th century

I sometimes wonder if it would not have been better

The evolution stops at the level of the butterflies ...
- Hubert Reeves, The Hour to get drunk.
Quebec, Twentieth century.

From the Buddhist point of view, all traditions and their teachings
Agree on the same goal to be achieved: alleviating the misery of life
Human life and to interrupt the cycle of existences. In this they are
All worthy of interest, even if their methods differ.
- Tenzin Gyatso, 14th and current Dalai Lama
(Quoted by Gilles van Grasdorff in Words of the Dalai Lamas).
Tibet, 20th Century
 Appendix i

In order to indicate how the refusal to exist constitutes a real invariant

Anthropological, we offer to lovers of despair this brief anthology of the mal-
Being and improcreationism, not without nourishing the utopia that the amateurs of babies
there Will breastfeed with long features.

Succincts Analects of Pessimism

Of all that on earth has breath and movement, no being is no longer

Miserable than man.

Such is the fate which the gods have wrought for the unfortunate mortals: to live in
Pain.
Homer, Iliad. Greece, 8th Century. AD

A thousand different plagues traverse the dwelling of mortals; The land is full
Of ills.
Hesiod, Works and Days. Greece, VII Century. AD

It is better for man to be dead than alive.

Solon (one of the Seven Sages). Greece, VIth Century. AD

Honestly, I would like to be dead.

I derive no pleasure from my life on earth; I want to die.
Sappho, Fragments. Greece, VIth Century. AD

The most desirable of all goods

For men, it is not to be born,
Theognis, Elegies. Greece, VIth Century. J.-C

The goods sought are difficult to obtain; But misfortunes

Even without seeking them.
We must realize that human life is fragile, ephemeral and mingled
Many worries and troubles.
Democritus, Fragments. Greece, Fifth Century. AD

Better a hundred times not be born;

But if we must see the light,
The least harm is still to return
Where you come from, and the sooner the better!
Sophocles, Oedipus at Colonus. Greece, Fifth Century. AD

We should be lamenting during our family celebrations, occasionally

From the birth of a child, to the thought of all the evils of existence,
And when death has put an end to our heavy hardships, we
Joyfully accompany by all our friends.
Euripides, Cresphonte. Greece, Fifh Century. AD

Human life is nothing but suffering, and there is no truce to its sorrows.
Euripides, Hippolytus. Greece, Fifth Century. AD

If death is the extinction of all feeling and resembles one of these

Sleep in which nothing is seen, even in a dream, it is a marvelous gain
Than to die.
Socrates, [Last words]. Greece, IVth Century. AD

Those who wish to perpetuate their lives and prevent their death are mistaken
In the understanding of things.
Lie-tseu, The Real Classic of the Perfect Vide. China, IVth Century.

Many events take place, capable of making us give up life:

For example, diseases, pains of birth, storms.
Thus, it is obvious that if we had been given the choice, these reasons
Would have, from the beginning, made choose not to be born. Let us add life
That we are leading in our childhood: no sensible man would accept
To return. Moreover, many circumstances do not offer us pleasure
Nor pain, others, a pleasure, certainly, but without beauty - circumstances
Capable of making us prefer the nothingness to life.
Aristotle, Ethics in Eudemus. Greece, IVth Century.

The life of a man is accompanied as soon as the birth of worries of any

Species. Life is nothing but dust and filth.
Tchouang-Tseu, Work. China, IVth Century. AD

Only, indeed, pain exists; This is why we do not get the happiness.
Mahabharata. India, circa IIIe Century. AD

I weep to be born at the wrong time,

And to have fallen in this horrible and insane period.
I am plunged into the darkest melancholy,
Strangled with sadness.
Song Yu, The nine Admonitions. China, Third Century. AD

For who really knows the world, everything is suffering.

Patanjali, Yoga-Sutra. India, 2nd Century. AD
As thou hast fallen asleep in death, such thou shalt remain eternally,
Free from all pain.[The newborn] fills the space with its plaintive wailings, as it is
Natural to the being which still has so many evils to cross.
Lucretia, Of Nature. Rome, Italy Century. AD

Death, to tell the truth, detaches us from evils and not from goods.
In reality, death puts an end to a life of misery.
Cicero, Tusculanes. Rome, 1st century BC. AD

Is it then so great a misfortune to die?

Virgil, Aeneid. Rome, 1st century BC. AD

The whole world lies in the power of the evil one.

Saint John, First Epistle. Israel, 1st century BC. AD

There is nothing so misleading, as perfidious as human life; no one,

Great gods! Would not want it, if we did not receive it without our knowledge. If, therefore,
The supreme felicity is not to be born, the one nearest to it is, I imagine, disappear as soon as
possible and quickly return to nothingness original.
Seneca, Consolation in Marcia. Rome 1st century.

Many people stood up to say that it would have been better not to
Or disappear as quickly as possible.
Pliny the Elder, Natural History. Rome, 1st century.

Aging and death, grief,

Lamentation, pain,
Sadness and torment
Are born from birth.
Nâgârjuna, Treaty of the Middle. India, 2nd century.

That the pain presents ceases, that no other is born: this is the goal of
Our exit from the world. Absolute Extinction: this is our last end.
 The Questions of Milinda. India, 2nd century.

Evil is Matter.
The body is the cause of evil.
Plotinus, Enneads. Greece, 3rd century.

Who is not sick in this life? Who drags on a life of languor?

To be born in a mortal body is to start an illness.
Saint Augustine, Discourse on the Psalms. Rome, 5th century.

May I see the most precious light that allows us to flee the misery of the world
Of birth as dark as the sea.
Proclus, Hymn to Hecate and Janus. Greece, 5th century.

The power of good is always weak, while the power of evil Is vast and terrible.
Something that causes suffering also causes fear, but the nothingness
Dispels suffering! Hence why does he cause fear?
Santideva, Introduction to the Path of Awakening. India, 8th century.

In this world none living has succeeded

To harvest better than torture and trouble.
Abu al-'Atahiyah, Divan. Arabia, 8th century.
Better to learn not to be born,
Not to be born is also not to disappear.
Po Kiu-yi. China, ninth century.

The abolition of my being is the noblest gift to be made to me, and my survival as
That I am the worst of wrongs. My life has disgusted my soul, among these ruins
Crush me, kill me, and burn me.
Husayn Mansur Hallaj, Kill me, my faithful comrades.
Persia, tenth century.

The living being, when he is alive, plunged and immersed in suffering; and
The situation in which there is no suffering is more salutary than the
Situation. Death is therefore more salutary to man
Than life.
Razi (Rhazes), The Spiritual Medicine. Arabia, tenth century.

Since his birth, man has been suffering unceasingly.

Such is the world of man. We must renounce with disgust this world
wretched.
Urabe Genshin, Ojôyôshû. Japan, tenth century.

The idea of the inconstancy of the world despairs me.

To escape the decadent spectacle of the ephemeral, is it not more
Rush to the bottom of a river?
Murasaki Shikibu, The History of Genji. Japan, eleventh century.

If the wise man had not come into this world,

He would not know cold and hot here below;
But he was born; He lives hard, and disappointed;
He must deplore this miserable life.
Firdousi, Book of Kings. Persia, XIth century.

To the gods absolute happiness, to men uninterrupted misfortune.

Somadeva, Ocean of the Rivers of Tales. India, eleventh century.

Since my coming into the world was not my choice [...] I want with
Wine destroy the sadness of the universe!
All is ruin, despair.
This land is not the place
The celestial sphere: a belt
For our life of torment!
O Heaven, our ruin comes from your hatred;
Injustice is your sovereign habit.
Omar Khayam, Rubayat. Persia, twelfth century.

My only desire:
Find a place to lie down and die.
Sad, really, is my destiny.
Saigyô, Evanescence. Japan, twelfth century.

All the way through the earth, you will not find
A single happy heart or a satisfied mind.
God of Justice, destroy me on the spot;
I would gladly give up my soul to death;
I no longer have any will to live.
Farîd al-Dîn 'Attâr, The Language of the Birds. Persia, twelfth century.
The soul desires dwelling, and dwelling is death.
I rejoice so much in annihilation.
We are ready to leave existence for nothingness.
Djalâl-od-Dîn Rûmî, Rubâi'yât. Persia, thirteenth century.

I call Death,
My tender and gentle rest,
I said to him, "Come to me", of such love
Let those who die die envy me.
Dante Alighieri, Vita Nuova. Italy, 13th century.

Staying in the earthly prison causes me, alas, an infinity of evils!

To live with me is so painful and so long that I invoke death.
François Pétrarque, Canzoniere. Italy, 14th century.

The great pain I bear

Is so harsh and so very strong
That [...] I would like to be dead.
Christine of Pisan, Virelai. France, XIVth century.

There is not a moment when this world afflicts me,

Always this world afflicts me!
Ah why is this wretched body
Is he alive for my spite?
Zeami, Tenko. Japan, fifteenth century.

How can one love a life filled with so much bitterness, prone to
So many evils and calamities? How can we even call life what
Engenders so many pains and so many dead?
Thomas A Kempis, The Imitation of Jesus Christ. Netherlands, 15th century.

One thing is certain,

We are all born in pain,
We are all in anxiety
And sadness, here among men.
On earth the torments are our lot.
Nezahualcoyotl, Song of the Flight. Mexico, fifteenth century.
I complain about the world because he created me.
Fernando de Rojas, The Celestine. Spain, fifteenth century.

Among the living I have not found any happy,

I have never seen anything but afflicted!
In vain we have obtained a human birth:
Many are entitled to this body!
The father and mother say, "He is our child,”
It was for their own benefit that they fed it.
Kabir. India, fifteenth century.

Happy the creature

Who made his burial
In the maternal womb!
Happy is the one whose life
Getting out was delighted
By an eternal sleep!
He did not feel on his head
The inevitable storm
We are agitated.
Joachim Du Bellay, The Complaint of the Desperate. France, 16th century

Ha! Death, common port, men's comfort,

Come bury my sorrows, I pray you with hands joined!
Happy who never was.
Pierre of Ronsard, Sonnets. France, 16th century.

My cradle.
What did I not find there, at once, my grave?
Torquato Tasso, Metz Canzone. Italy, 16th century.
Death is the remedy for all evils. It is a very secure port,
Never to be feared, and often to seek.
Michel de Montaigne, Essays. France, 16th century.
Sleep after work, the haven after the storm,
Rest after the war, death after life,
It is a great pleasure.
Death is the end of misfortunes.
Edmund Spenser, The Queen of the Fairies. England, sixteenth century.

Well-being is in heaven; But we are on earth,

Where all is but annoyance, worry, and grief.
William Shakespeare, Richard II. England, sixteenth century.

When we are born, we cry for coming on this vast scene of

crazy.
William Shakespeare, King Lear. England, seventeenth century.

Who will improve my fate? The death.

Let us recommend it to God, who knows the things that must
To arrive in this valley of tears, in this wicked world where we live,
And where scarcely can anything be seen which is not mingled with malice, treason, and
roguery.
Miguel de Cervantes, Don Quixote. Spain, seventeenth century.

What death worse than death is this life that so many good men
Would so often exchange for death!
John Donne, Death's Duel. England, seventeenth century.

I do not know by what adventure my mother gave me the day,

In this, however, Nature did play a nasty trick.
Francisco de Quevedo, Malchance. Spain, seventeenth century.

In this world, all beings are deprived of happiness and do not know
Than pain.
Shôsan, Ninin-Bikuni. Japan, seventeenth century.

The major offense of man,

It is to be born.
Calderon de la Barca, Life is a Dream. Spain, seventeenth century.
How many sufferings during the cycle of my life!
What have I gained to be born? I still wonder.
Tukârâm, Psalms of the Pilgrim. India, seventeenth century.

Let him who does not know thee esteem thee, O life! But the undeceived man would prefer
To have passed from the cradle to the coffin, from the natal bed to the tomb. A Common Omen
Of the miseries which await him, is that man weeps when he is born.
What can be a life that begins between the cries of the mother who gives it,
And the tears of the child who receives it?
Baltasar Gracian, The Undeceived Man. Spain, seventeenth century.

Condition of man: inconstancy, boredom, anxiety.

We seek happiness, and find only misery and death.
One must not have a very high soul to understand that there is no here
Of true and solid satisfaction, that all our pleasures are vanity,
That our evils are infinite.
Blaise Pascal, Thoughts. France, 17th century.

O wretched humanity, to what a lowered degradation,

What a lamentable condition!
Better to end here, unborn.
If we knew what we were getting,
Who would accept the life offered,
Or would soon beg to be dismissed
Happy to be thus dismissed in peace?
John Milton, The Lost Paradise. England, 17th century

Men must weep at their birth, and not at their death.

Montesquieu, Persian Letters. France, 18th century.

Elements, animals, humans, everything is at war.

It must be confessed, evil is on earth.
Death is a good that ends our miseries.
No one would want to be reborn.
Voltaire, Poem on the Lisbon Disaster. France, 18th century.

I wish to be dead is a frequent wish that proves, at least

Sometimes, that there are things more precious than life.
Denis Diderot, Interview on the Natural Son. France, 18th century.

Dissatisfied with life, fearing death. This, I say, is the secret

Retains us. We are driven by terror, not by seduction,
To continue our existence.
Neither man nor any other animal is happy.
David Hume, Dialogues on Natural Religion. Scotland, 18th century.

My birth was the first of my misfortunes.

J.-J. Rousseau, The Confessions. France, 18th century.

To be born, yes, to be born, I reprehend an unfortunate misfortune,

What is not to die, since from so much anguish
I feel free.
Vittorio Alfieri, Sonnet. Italy, 18th century.

Sweet is your sleep, calm will be your rest in the sepulcher. There, grief
Also expires with joy; There cease the torments of man.
Friedrich von Schiller, Elegy on the Death of a Young Man. Germany, 18th century.

Living is a disease whose sleep relieves us every sixteen

hours. It is a palliative. Death is the remedy.
Chamfort, Maximes and Thoughts. France, 18th century.

"We have suffered, we have hoped; But we are annihilated! - O

All powerful ! Stop creating! "
Jean-Paul Richter, The Annihilation. Germany, 18th century.

A tomb remains the best fortification against the storms of the

destiny.
Georg Christoph Lichtenberg, Aphorisms. Germany, 18th century.
To sleep for a long time and much [...], it is certainly to spare
The annoyances which life in general infallibly brings to the waking state.
Emmanuel Kant, The Conflict of the Faculties. Germany, 18th century.

The certain end of all pain and all predisposition to pain,

it's death ; And of all the accidents which the ordinary man has in common
To call misfortunes, death is to me the least.
J. G. Fichte, The Destiny of Man. Germany, 19th century.

Life is a burden to me, I desire death and I abhor existence.

Oh ! That I am never born!
J. W. von Goethe, Faust. Germany, 19th century.

The Days harass and disconcert us;

And yet we live,
Abominating our lives, and terrifying us to die.
G. G. Lord Byron, Manfred. England, 19th century.

I was not born: I did not seek to be born, and does not like the situation
In which this birth has thrown me. [...] I wish I had never
Lived!
Giving birth to those who can only suffer for many
Years, then to die, it seems to me that it is simply propagating death, and
Multiply the murder.
G. G. Lord Byron, Cain. England, 19th century.

What crime have we done to deserve to be born?

Did the insensible nothing ask you to be,
Or did he accept it?
Are we, by chance, the work of your caprices?
Or rather, God cruel, was our tortures
For your felicity?
Alphonse de Lamartine, The Despair. France, 19th century

What was your life? Exile, boredom, suffering.

 Alphonse de Lamartine, Hymn of Death. France, 19th century.

Life, a sterile and fortuitous gift, [...]

Who, in a hostile design,
Has pulled me out of nothingness,
Bonding to my fiery soul
A mind gnawed with doubts?
Alexander Pushkin, [Untitled]. Russia, nineteenth century.

In all conditions, in the cradle as in the den, the day of

Birth is for him who is born a fatal day.
Giacomo Leopardi, Nocturnal Song of a Wandering Shepherd from Asia. Italy, 19th century.

Here below nothing is complete than misfortune.

Honore de Balzac, The Skin of Sorrow. France, 19th century.

How terrible it is to be born!

Ah! What a burden life has!
It is death that I pursue.
Angel de Saavedra, Duke of Rivas, Don Alvaro or the Force of Fate. Spain, 19th century.

Our life is to be murdered by work.

A fault was committed the day we were created.
Life is not worth the fatigue that is given to preserve it.
Georg Büchner, The Death of Danton. Germany, 19th century.

What is misfortune? Life.

Oh God be cursed by his creatures!
Gustave Flaubert, Agonies. France, 19th century.

Oh ! Yes ! Yes, alas! Despair reigns and suffering and complaint

Emanate from all the pores of creation.
George Sand, Lelia. France, 19th century.

The whole world is sadness and despair.

Nicolas Lenau, Solitude. Austria, nineteenth century.
A certain detestable evening I had the misfortune to be born.
Lermontov, A Hero of our Time. Russia, nineteenth century.

Why was man created? He torments, he kills, he devours; he suffers,

Dies, is devoured - you have there its whole history.
Emily Brontë, The Butterfly. England, 19th century.

By nature, life does not admit true felicity, it is fundamentally a

Suffering to the various aspects, a state of radical misfortune.
Our state is so unhappy that an absolute non-being would be much preferable.
Arthur Schopenhauer, The World as Will and as Representation. Germany, 19th century.

The only happiness is not to be born.

The end of the world is salvation; To prepare this end is the work of the sage.
Arthur Schopenhauer, Interview with Challemel-Lacour. Germany, 19th century.

After the misfortune of being born, I know of no greater than that of

Give birth to a man.
Chateaubriand, Memoires d'Outre-Tombe. France, 19th century.

O men! A race really worthy of contempt and pity!

I played my little comedy to the end. The curtain falls down. I stop being
Too much by returning to nothingness.
Ivan Turgenev, The Journal of a Man of Too. Russia, nineteenth century.

Sleep is good, death is better, but it would be better

Yet never be born.
Heinrich Heine, The Book of Lazarus. Germany, 19th century.

My misfortune is to be born.
Victor Hugo, To the veiled one. France, 19th century.

That this world is a shit, deep down is what everyone knows

Little experience. That this existence is a great good, and that a suicide is consequently to be
blamed Because gesture of ingratitude: it is naturally lies and stupidity.
 Søren Kierkegaard, Journal. Denmark, nineteenth century.

He regarded reproduction as a vice of love, pregnancy

As a spider disease. He wrote somewhere: Angels are
Hermaphroditic and sterile.
Charles Baudelaire, La Fanfarlo. France, 19th century.

The world, monotonous and small, today,

Yesterday, tomorrow, always, makes us see our image:
An oasis of horror in a desert of boredom.
Charles Baudelaire, The Voyage. France, 19th century.

Life is not good. One day it will be good to die.

Christina Rossetti, Life and Death. England, 19th century.

I received life as an injury, and I forbade suicide to heal

the scar. I want the Creator to contemplate, every hour of his
Eternity, the gaping crevice. This is the punishment I inflict on him.
Lautreamont, The Songs of Maldoror. France, 19th century.

It is clear that suicide, once the idea of immortality has been lost,
An absolute and even inevitable necessity for every man who has so little
Whether intellectually elevated above the beast.
Fyodor Dostoevsky, Journal of a Writer. Russia, nineteenth century.

It would be better, indeed, not to be born.

To flee life is the first point, [...] to wish for death and to seek it is
the second.
Leopold von Sacher-Masoch, The Wanderer. Austria, nineteenth century.

Though I hate life, I do not have enough strength in my body to

To take death and to put an end to it.
R. L. Stevenson, The Suicide Club. Scotland, 19th century.

I said I existed, I asked why,

I screamed that the heavens made me accountable!
O Law, serene Law, I wanted you to subdue
The will, to return to the old void left!
Jules Laforgue, Am I ?. France, 19th century.
I am afraid of life, not of death.
Lord Alfred Tennyson, Despair. England, 19th century

Delighted with this knot of strangulation called life,

Sweet, peaceful, welcome: Death.
Walt Whitman, The Valley of Death. United States, 19th century.

What a mass of misery there is in the world!

We all struggle to seize happiness, and as soon as we get one
Little on one side, misfortune happens on the other side.
Swami Vivekananda, Jnana-Yoga. India, nineteenth century.

I went through all the possible modes of suffering. Better than

Wordsworth himself I know what Wordsworth meant when he said:
The suffering is permanent, obscure, and dark.
Nature of Infinity.
Oscar Wilde, De Profundis. Ireland, 19th century.

Sad to die, lugubrious is life.

Hell exists, but here, on earth.
Let us suffer, then, brothers, without hoping for life a single solid joy,
Because we are in hell.
Auguste Strindberg, Inferno. Sweden, nineteenth century.

Life is an evil.
Auguste Strindberg, Coram Populo. Sweden, 19th century.

It would be better if I had not come into the world.

Albert Einstein, Letter to his Sister (1898). Germany, 19th century.

In a thousand years, the man will sigh as now: "Ah! That life
is hard ! And as now he will be afraid of death and will not
Not die.
We are not happy and happiness does not exist, we can not
Than desire it.
Oh ! If we could not exist!
Anton Chekhov, The Three Sisters. Russia, nineteenth century.

The dead seem to me the only human being really well off.
Mark Twain, Of Religion. United States, 20th century
Everything moves towards death, for it is the law, and if it does not serve much
To live, the wisest is perhaps to die as soon as possible.
The fate of man is reduced to suicide.
Peace is obtained in death. We must die to enter the Peace.
Natsume Sôseki, I'm a Cat. Japan, 20th century.

By listening to the moaning of the unfortunate land

I feel too much towards the evening, the horror of being born.
Renee Vivien, Dura Lex, sed Lex. France, 20th century.

Life is tragedy and perpetual struggle without victory and without hope of
victory.
Miguel de Unamuno, The Tragic Sentiment of Life. Spain, 20th century.

I'll end up killing myself, it's obvious.

It would be better for me to be dead, really.
There is no limit to human suffering.
Katherine Mansfield, Journal. New Zealand, 20th century.

The universe is only a defect

In the purity of Non-being!
Paul Valery, Draft of a Serpent. France, 20th century.

I suffer terribly from life.

I feel the appetite of not being.
Antonin Artaud, Is Suicide a Solution? France, 20th century.

The dream, the only dream is not to be born.

André Breton, The Immaculate Conception. France, 20th century.

It is my sad, sad life that continues. Those who gave birth to me, they
Will pay for it.
Henri Michaux, Cursed. Belgium, 20th century

Life as it is imposed on us is too hard for us, it

Brings too many pains, disappointments, insoluble tasks.
Our possibilities of happiness are already limited by our constitution. There is
Much less difficulty in experiencing unhappiness.
Sigmund Freud, Malaise in the Civilization. Austria, 20th century.

Mother I blame
Of which the crime in love
Façonna my form
In his matrix
Who gave me life and then the grave
Mother I blame
Dylan Thomas, Written for an Epitaph. Wales, 20th century.

If I were God, at the sight of the physical sufferings

The universe and especially among animals and men, I would be
Of such horror that I would instantly annihilate all my creation and
Myself with her.
Maurice Maeterlinck, Before God. Belgium, 20th century.

I have had enough of humanity, beyond all measure. Delete it.

This stupid, greedy, stinking, murderous, murderous, obsequious,
Piaillant, and undernourished! Get rid of the earth.
H. G. Wells, Children of the Stars. England, twentieth century.

They marry, they have the extreme folly of making children.

Jean-Paul Sartre, The Nausea. France, 20th century.

Not to be so hateful that he deserves to be pitied for his enlistment

Forced into existence
The highest of minds may not be qualified to understand the universe;
But the last of the suffering hearts has the right to incriminate him.
Jean Rostand, Thoughts of a Biologist. France, 20th century.

How black and tall is the crowd of misfortunes!

To this demented world I oppose my refusal!
Marina Zvetaeva, [Untitled]. Russia, 20th century.

One can not contemplate without terror the extent of the evil that man can
Do and suffer.
Death is that which has been given most precious to man.
Relation of evil with strength, with being, and good with weakness,
nothingness.
Simone Weil, Gravity and Grace. France, 20th century.

Will it ever occur to one of these innocent sluts to drag themselves

Barefooted in the ages for the forgiveness of this crime: to have borne us?
Michel Leiris, The Mother. France, 20th century.

Mirrors and copulation are abominable, because they multiply the

Number of men.
Jorge Luis Borges, Fictions. Argentina, twentieth century.

Engendering is infamous.
Life is hell.
The human adventure is nine hundred billion times more appalling than
Imagined him the most sorrowful mind.
Louis Scutenaire, My Listings. Belgium, 20th century.

Because he hates gratuitousness and death, man has a horror

Of having been begotten.
Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex. France, 20th century.

In front of us stands the terrible question of evil and we do not

Not even mention the answer that it would
To oppose it.
The world into which we are entering at birth is brutal and cruel.
Carl Gustav Jung, My Life. Switzerland, 20th century.

Life is evil, suffering, despair.

Do not be better than being, supreme curse.
Julien Teppe, Manuel of Despair. France, 20th century.

I'm looking for my mother, to kill her, you had to think about it earlier, before
born.
Samuel Beckett, The Unnamable. Ireland, 20th century.

Life is infernal, inadmissible.

At no time could I feel at ease in this world of misfortunes
And death.
 Eugene Ionesco, Journal in Miettes. France, 20th century.

The human species, the most abject of all creation.

The Terran's daily life is only a hell and work an easement
At all times.
Jacques Sternberg, Open Letter to the Terrans. Belgium, 20th century.

No death for children. They were brought into the world without asking them
Their opinion ... Do not tell them too early about death, they risk experiencing
A filial love less pure towards the authors of their days.
Roland Topor, in Topor, the Elegant Man. France, 20th century.

To attain wisdom is no longer to aspire to being the zero figure that is erased
Of the blackboard.
What is more obscene than a woman wearing proudly in her belly
A future corpse?
Roland Jaccard, Topology of Pessimism. France, 20th century.

To bring forth to Being what, outside of a will, would come from it otherwise
Never must assume reasons, and more specifically good reasons.
Which ones? I do not see any. Thinking hard, I see even more reason
Not to procreate that the reverse.
Michel Onfray, The Virtues of Lightning. France, 20th century.

Every minute, 100 people die, 240 are born. The reverse would have been
Better. Not being and not being born, there is tranquility.
André Stas, Artificial Radishes. Belgium, 21st century.
 Appendix ii
Florilège of Anti-Natalism in the feminine

Who, then, in meditating the Scriptures or the problems of philosophy,

Would bear the wails of a newborn child, [...] uncleanliness
Childhood?
Heloise (cited by Abelard in Histoire de mes Malheurs). France, 12th century.

Parental love is, perhaps, the most blind modification of love for self
perverse.
Parental love is, in many minds, only a pretext for
Tyrannise where this can be done with impunity.
Mary Wollstonecraft, Defense of Women's Rights. England, 18th century.

Ah! What immense joy after so much suffering!

Through the debris, over the mass graves,
To be able finally to throw this cry of deliverance:
"More men under the sky, we are the last! "
Louise Ackermann, Pascal. Last word. France, 19th century.

We hate the rut that defiles desire.

We throw the anathema to the foul sigh
Hence the pains of the beings to come.
Renee Vivien, Litany of Hate. France, 20th century.

My little child mine, who never existed [...]

If he is cruel to me, he is happy for you
That never cradle received under my roof
Your sensitive and lively form!
My little child mine, stone and thistle,
The desert and the thirst, the night and the abandonment:
Here is the life and its domain ...
And should not I have asked you for forgiveness
Seeing you fall under this terrible gift
What is a human destiny?
I frustrate the future, sterile without remorse,
Of all the pains and all the dead
What I have not brought forth in thee!
Amélie Murat, For the Child that does not exist. France, 20th century.
Abortion. [...] I told my child that he should rejoice not to
Be released in this world where even the greatest joys are tainted with
Suffering, where we are the slaves of material forces. […] My
Child, my half-created child that I am going to return to nothingness. return
Darkness, unconsciousness, and the paradise of non-being. […] All of us,
Forever condemned to seek this warmth and darkness, this life
Without suffering, this life without anguish, without fear and without solitude. […] He
It would be better for you to die, my unborn child. […] It would
Better than you die in my belly, very slowly, in the heat and
in darkness. [...] Renunciation of a form of maternity for love
Of another, higher creation. [...] Nature became my accomplice,
So that I may remain Bilitis, that I may remain the Virgin. [...] I did not
Offered to the land, I refused to take care of a child's life.
Anaïs Nin, Journal. United States, 20th century.

I consider life as a long way of the cross and men as

Be miserable, and feel unable to take on the responsibility of increasing
The humanity of an unfortunate creature more.
To save the life of a being by barring the path of this life at all times! I
Want him to avoid entering this valley of tears. [...] I will have the feeling
To have done a good deed, to be responsible.
Etty Hillesum, A Shattered Life. Netherlands, 20th century.

Every little child who played on the sand, I was

Woman [...] Women with their soft bodies always ready to bud
New little ones, men watching all that pulp of women
And children to them, with a satisfied air.
Colette Audry, We play loser. The Child. France, 20th century.

Alongside frankly sadistic mothers, there are many who are above all
Capricious; What enchants them is to dominate; Very small, the baby is
A toy: if it is a boy they amuse themselves without scruple of his sex; if
It is a girl they make a doll; Later, they want a small
Slave blindly obey them: vain, they show the child as
A learned animal; Jealous and exclusive, they isolate it from the rest of the world.
Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex. France, 20th century.
Boulot, Omo, Marmots: Y'EN A MARRE / Contraception for all and
All / Abortion free and free.
Placard worn by MLF activists in the 1970s (Reproduced in Naître and après? From Baby to Child
By Drina Candilis-Huisman). France, 20th century.

Supporting the sacralization of maternal function in such

Circumstances [overcrowding of the planet] becomes the most
Hideous of jokes: it is hardly found any more elsewhere than in
The speeches of the Vatican or the Pussycats, the last ramparts of the
Patriarchal sexism.
Françoise d'Eaubonne, History and Actuality of Feminism. La France, 20th century.

Women dare to declare their disgust with the maternal condition. They
Do not ask for it, they denounce it, they refuse it,
In word and deed. Marriage and Maternity, far from accomplishing the
Femininity, only adds to what will soon be called "femininity"
And break the rise of a personality.
Yvonne Knibielher and Catherine Fouquet, History of Mothers from the Middle Ages to our Days.
France, 20th century.

I would leave, leave everything, no longer exist. I want nothing.

I did not ask for life, I do not want any more. Now I have the right to
to choose. I can not help it if my mother did not use contraceptives.
I do not understand how one can decide to "give birth"
a child ".
You who did it you will traumatize it, raise it badly, your way
Will make him unhappy later ... Besides what do you expect?
That he will succeed in being happy in a world where you could not be?
But look, look! He has no chance of passing the test!
No, it's not pessimism. Look at the misfortune of others,
Will relieve you. Do them anyway, but at least have decency
To kill them once born. You will have had your dream, ridiculous, unhealthy,
dishonest.
The parents should not exist.
"Family", this word flayed my lips like a razor blade.
I prefer the backstage of the theaters to the mothers of the mothers ... First
"Mother", it should not exist.
Valérie Valère, The Pavilion of the Crazy Children. France, 20th century
Being a woman is not, or not necessarily, a mother. Being a
Mother can even prevent a woman from being oneself.
Men recover as badly as women have had a mother.
But they have the advantage of being able to bring their problem to
women. How do we free ourselves from mothers?
Being a mother does not offset the power of the father or society
But reinforce it.
Françoise Collin (founder and director of the Cahiers du Grif), in The Children of Women.
Belgium, 20th century.

A child in the stomach. Then in the arms. Where to put it? He's there. I
Would not want to be there. After blistering, swelling, invasion
Now he took my body. He devours my time.
Yogurt flavor when I kiss her. Softness of the stool. Liquids one
Little white. Good to breathe. A disgust of enjoyment. Good caca
Warm, well-flowing smooth. Pleasure of sweet fetidity. I found
My body, but I lost my life. More night, more day. I'm at
Service of. Laundries, feedings, baby bottles, shopping very quickly, so that nothing happens to
him. I does not exist anymore. I do. I torch. I wash. I torch. I'm talking.
Jacqueline Aubenas, in The Children of Women. Belgium, 20th century.

Sometimes the woman is not satisfied with these defects that weigh on her existence:
Husband and son.
Elfriede Jelinek, Lust. Austria, 20th century.

The tidal wave of famine overpopulation threatens our planet

burst. Children, for what?
Gisèle Halimi (quoted by Xaviere Gauthier In Birth of a Freedom). France, 20th century.
In countries where there is no pension, children
Pension Insurance. Parents rely on them to provide for their
When they can no longer work. And even when they are
Young people, children are seen less as mouths to feed than
Like arms to work.
Most of the time, laws are made by men. It is necessary
Of the children so that there will be no decline in the birth rate, they say.
They need children to make an army, they get upset. It takes children
To ensure the old days of the parents, they rave. It takes children
To please God, who blesses them, preach. And women, what is
What do they need?
The natalists who have so demanded future soldiers and future
Taxpayers are (or should be) obliged now to rest
Global problem and to realize the serious problem
Of overpopulation which leads to famines.
Xaviere Gauthier, Birth of a Freedom. France, 21st century.