Multi-Rate Well Testing: Rate-After-Rate Test
Multi-Rate Well Testing: Rate-After-Rate Test
Multi-Rate Well Testing: Rate-After-Rate Test
This article describes different types of multi-rate tests, as well as addressing which type of well test
should be performed to meet a given objective. Different types of multi-rate tests are performed to meet
the following objectives:
One of the difficulties in a rate-after-rate test is that some of the rate changes may not be large enough to
create a new transient in the reservoir. To ensure a new transient is created each time the rate is
changed, the new rate should be double the previous rate. If this is not the case, boundaries may affect
the pressure decline differently for different rates, which often leads to an underestimation of the well's PI.
To mitigate this problem, isochronal tests may be performed.
Isochronal (Modified) Tests
Isochronal tests (and Modified Isochronal tests) provide more accurate deliverabilities than those
provided by a rate-after-rate test and also permit evaluation of rate-dependent skin. After a stabilized
SIBHP is achieved, the well is produced in the same sequence as a rate-after-rate test, except that at the
end of each rate, the well is shut-in. In an Isochronal test, the well is shut-in until the SIBHP stabilizes; in
a Modified Isochronal test, the well is shut-in for the length of time of the previous flow period. The last
flow period is generally 4-6 times the length of the other flow periods. After the final flow period, the well
may be shut-in again, especially if the initial shut-in data were not gathered. In practice, modified
isochronal tests are performed much more often than regular isochronal tests, since they are less open-
ended (fixed shut-in times), take less time and provide equivalent results. Deliverabilities are determined
in a similar fashion to rate-after-rate tests, except that the final shut-in pressure prior to the rates is used
to calculate the effective DeltaP across the reservoir, instead of a fixed P*.
In general, the only drawback to a multi-rate test is that it has to be executed properly to get meaningful
results. All flow periods must be the same length of time except the final "stabilized flow" period which
should be 2-3 times the length of the previous flow periods for a rate-after-rate or 4-6 times the flow
period for Isochronal tests. Rate-after-rate tests should have at least 3 rates and Isochronal tests should
at least 4. Most importantly, each successive flow rate should be HIGHER than the previous rate.
Summary
Multi-rates are useful for completion and reservoir evaluation, regulatory testing and AOF or
deliverability of the well.
A "rule of thumb" for drawdown testing (after shut-in) is that it is usually believable up to 2 TIMES
the length of the previous shut-in. Therefore if the well has been shut-in for 2 days prior to the
drawdown the first 4 days of the drawdown are typically reliable information.
Constant Choke, not constant rate
Simultaneously test while selling gas
Multi-rate or flowing tests are typically not well-suited for type-curve analysis methods.