ISSN 1822-6515 ISSN 1822-6515 Ekonomika Ir Vadyba: 2011. 16 Economics and Management: 2011. 16
ISSN 1822-6515 ISSN 1822-6515 Ekonomika Ir Vadyba: 2011. 16 Economics and Management: 2011. 16
ISSN 1822-6515 ISSN 1822-6515 Ekonomika Ir Vadyba: 2011. 16 Economics and Management: 2011. 16
Among organizations employees normative commitment level is the poorest of the three dimensions
of commitment (mean 2,18). 50,0 per cent of respondents state that they were not taught to believe in the
value of remaining loyal to one organization, 45,2 per cent agree that these days people move from company
to company too often. Only 27,4 percent of respondents state that they wouldn’t feel that it was wrong to
leave the organization if something better came along. Whereas normative commitment refers to the
employee‘s feelings of obligation and need to work (Buciuniene & Skudiene, 2008), it could be drawn the
conclusion that employee do not feel indebted to this organization.
The analysis of three dimensions of commitment reveals that affective commitment is dominant (mean
2,7). The employee feel identification with organization and an emotional involvement with an organization:
85,5 per cent of respondents feel a strong sense of belonging to the organization, 79,0 per cent – feel like
“part of the family”, 71,0 per cent - would be very happy to spend the rest of career with this organization.
However, from another side the employee do not treat organizations problems as their own (61,3 per cent
separate problems).
In relation to continuance commitment (mean 2,47), 83,9 per cent of respondents are afraid of what
might happen if they quit job right now without having another one lined up; 48,4 per cent do not see career
possibilities (one of the few negative consequences of leaving this organization would be the scarcity of
available alternatives). The findings reflect the socioeconomic situation in Lithuania and reveal that
employee are compelled to commit to the organization because the cost associated with leaving are too high.
Under such circumstances employee make the decision to stay in organization and save the position.
Job satisfaction level. The level of job satisfaction is quite high (mean 2,73), however intrinsic
satisfaction (mean 2,71) is higher than an extrinsic job satisfaction (mean 2,65).
In relation to intrinsic satisfaction, on the top of the rating are statements which are outcomes of skill-
enhancing HRM practices (93,5 per cent are satisfied with the chance to work alone, 80,6 per cent are
content with chances to do different things from time to time) or which are outcomes of engagement-
enhancing HRM practices (90,3 per cent are satisfied with changes to do something that makes use of the
abilities). At the least (only 38,7 per cent) the respondents are satisfied with the chance to be “somebody” in
the community. The research reveals differencies concerning intrinsic satisfaction in separate employees age
groups: employees up to 30 years old feel the minimal intrinsic satisfaction (mean 2,37), the most intrinsic
satisfied (mean 2,80) are workers over the age 50.
As regard to extrinsic job satisfaction, the satisfaction concerning line managers are identified: 93,5
per cent of respondents are satisfied the way the line managers are handling worker; 90,3 per cent – with
competence of line managers in making decisions. These findings let to conclude that line managers do not
act as “robot conformist” in enacting HRM policies (Harney & Jordan, 2008) and that the employees in the
organization are content with the way how line managers undertake people management activities. It
worthwhile to mention, that the same trend concerning extrinsic satisfaction in separate employees age
groups shows up: the most extrinsic satisfied (mean 2,94) are workers over the age 50.
The results of correlation analysis. The results of correlations between HRM practices and affective
human resource reactions are shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Correlation between HRM practices and affective human resource reactions
1 2 3 4 5
1 Skill-enhancing HRM practices 1,00 0,321* 0,405** 0,483** 0,411**
2 Motivation-enhancing HRM practices 1,00 0.606** 0,314* 0,533**
3 Engagement-enhancing HRM practices 1,00 0,293* 0,551**
4 Organizational commitment 1,00 0,634**
5 Job satisfaction 1,00
Notes: *mutual correlation is significant at p<0,05; **mutual correlation is significant at p<0,01
The correlations in Table 1 show that meaningful statistical relationships are between HRM practices:
skill-enhancing HRM practices weak correlate with motivation-enhancing HRM practices (r=0,321, p<0,05)
and with engagement-enhancing HRM practices (r=0,405, p<0,01); meanwhile, motivation-enhancing HRM
practices medium significantly correlate with engagement-enhancing HRM practices (r=0,606, p<0,01).
These results allow to draw the conclusion that investment in one HRM practices kind (for example in skill-
enhancing HRM practice, like training) stimulates the level of other HRM practices.
925