Section 188 IPC-Disobedience To Order Duly Promulgated by Public Servant
Section 188 IPC-Disobedience To Order Duly Promulgated by Public Servant
Section 188 IPC-Disobedience To Order Duly Promulgated by Public Servant
One should always keep in mind that it is a moral responsibility of every citizen to obey the laws
ordained. When a person commits an offence by disobeying any order promulgated, Indian Penal
Code gives strict provisions regarding the punishments for such offences.
Whenever an order is announced publically by a public servant, who is legally authorized to put such
order into effect by an official proclamation, if any person having the knowledge that the order
passed abstains him/her from certain act, or to take certain order with certain property in his
possession or under his management, disobeys the order which causes hindrance, annoyance or
injury, or possibility of obstruction, to the person who was legally employed to pass such order will
be held responsible for disobedience to order duly promulgated by the public servant. Also if the
disobedience leads to a riot of affray or puts human life at risk then the person will be held liable
under section 188 of Indian Penal Code. However, it is not essential for disobedience to cause harm.
Mere knowledge of disobeying and knowledge that such disobedience may cause harm is sufficient
to commit an offence under this section.
If a person commits an offence under section 188 of IPC, certain conditions must be fulfilled for
application of the section.
Madras High Court in one of its judgement specified that, a person may be legally justified, though
not lawfully empowered. For example, a Police Inspector may stop the playing of music or speech
made by someone, if he apprehends breach of peace, but he is not lawfully empowered to do so
within the meaning of this Section. Also, Promulgation of an order would mean “to make known by
public declaration, to publish, to disseminate or to proclaim". The normal practice that is followed is,
by way of a publication in Gazette and by announcing the same in newspapers with wide circulation.
Madras High Court in one of its judgement said, if in a town where no order was passed for chaining
up of dogs, A suffers his dog to run about loose, A will not be liable to punishment for any mischief
which the animal may do, unless it can be shown that A knew the animal to be dangerous. But if an
order for confining dogs has been issued, and if A knew of that order, it will not be a defence for him
to allege, and even to prove, that he believed his dog to be perfectly harmless. If the Court thinks
that A's disobedience has caused harm, or risk of harm, A will be liable to punishment. On the other
hand, if the Court thinks that there was no danger, and that the local order was a foolish one, A will
not be liable to punishment.
Illustration
An order is promulgated by a public servant lawfully empowered to promulgate such order, directing
that a religious procession shall not pass down a certain street. A, knowingly disobeys the order, and
thereby causes danger of riot. A has committed the offence defined in this section.
For example, in a landmark decision, the magistrate issued an order attaching certain standing crop.
Even though the accused knew about this attachment order he reaped and removed the crop. It was
said by the Orissa High Court that since the disobedience of the order by the accused had a
tendency to cause riot or affray, the accused will be held liable under section 188 of Indian Penal
Code.
Under section 188 of Indian Penal Code when an offence of disobedience of an order duly
promulgated by a public servant has been committed which causes obstruction, annoyance or injury
to the legal authority passing the order, then the offender will be punished with simple imprisonment
for one month or fine up to 200 rupees. However, if any disobedience of the order causes risk to
human life or leads to a riot or affray the person will be punished with imprisonment of 6 months or
with fine up to 1000 rupees. The term of punishment depends upon the gravity of the offence
committed.
The offence punishable under section 188 of IPC is a cognizable offence, meaning thereby, if a
person has committed an offence under this section the police can arrest such person without a
warrant. An offence under this section is bailable in nature and is liable to be investigated and
decided by the Magistrate who is having the authority over the area where such offence has been
committed.