IOSR Journal of Pharmacy and Biological Sciences (IOSR-JPBS)

e-ISSN: 2278-3008, p-ISSN:2319-7676. Volume 7, Issue 6 (Sep. – Oct. 2013), PP 49-54

www.iosrjournals.org

Determination of lethal dose (LD50) of Exotoxin A from

Pseudomonasaeruginosa26A in mice histopathology
Essam F, Al-Jumaily1Bushra H. Saleh2 andShalal M. Hussain3
1
Biotechnology Depart./ Institute of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology for postgraduate studies, Baghdad
University, IRAQ.
2
Medical Microbiology Department, Medical College, Al-Nahrain University, Baghdad, IRAQ.
3
Iraqi Center for Cancer and Medical Genetics Research, Al-Mustanseria University, IRAQ.

Abstract: This study was conducted for investigating to determination of lethal dose (LD50) of purified toxin A
produced frompseudomonas aeruginosa(26 A) strain in mice histopathology.
LD50 of purified toxin A produced from pseudomonas aeruginosa26A strainwas detected after
injection different concentration of purified toxin A (0.05 ,0.1, 0.2 ,0.25 ,1,2 and 4) μg/ ml in mice and lethality
were recorded for five days which reveal that LD50 of purified toxin was 1 μg /ml. On the other hand
histopathological examination of liver ,spleen and kidney in mice injected with high doses reveal significant
histopatholgical degeneration .
Key words: lethal dose, Exotoxin A, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, mice histopathology

I. Introduction
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is the leading etiology of gram negative bacteria at most medical centers and
its always listed as one of the top three most frequent Gram-negative pathogens that linked to the worst visual
diseases [1] .
P.aeruginosa is an opportunistic human pathogen. It is opportunistic because its seldom infects healthy
individuals. Instead, it often colonizes immunocompromised patients, like those with cystic fibrosis, cancer, or
AIDS [2]. Itsa potent pathogen that firstly attacks up two thirds of the critically ill hospitalized patients and
cause 40-60% mortality rate [3]. It also exhibits intrinsic resistance to a lot of different types of
chemotherapeutic agents and antibiotics, making it a very hard pathogen to eliminate [4].
Exotoxin A (ETA) is considered as the most toxic virulence factor secreted by P. aeruginosa. The toxin
was first discovered and purified by Liu who reported that P. aeruginosa PA103, a protease-deficient strain,
produces more toxin than P. aeruginosa strains which actively produce proteases [5].Exotoxin A appears to
mediate both local and systemic disease processes caused by P.aeruginosa. It has necrotizing activity at the site
of bacterial colonization and is thereby thought to contribute to the colonization process [6].
ETA is a heat-labile, single polypeptide chain consist of 613 amino-acid and four disulfide linkages
with a molecular weight of 66 kDa. X ray crystallographystudies and deletion mutation analysis of ETA
revealed the overall tertiary structure of the molecule which consists of three functional domains in order to be
toxic, namely binding to the receptor on the cell membrane, translocation across the membrane, and ADP
ribosylation activities [7, 8].

II. Materials and Methods

2.1.Preparation of exotoxin A
A toxigenic strain of P. aeruginosa(PA 26A) was used for exotoxin A preparation. Exotoxin A was
partially purified and purified according to the method described by Salehet al.[9].
Groups of Swiss albino BALB/c mice, which were obtained from theICCMGR, were used in this study
.mice were kept in cages in animal house with 23-25ºC temperature and were fed with suitable quantity of water
and complete diet.

2.2.Determination of exotoxin A toxicity A in mice

Groups consists of 20 mice (females). Their ages ranged between (8-12) weeks and weighting ( 20-25)
gram. They were divided into (4 ) groups and the last one was left as control . Each group was kept in a
separate plastic cage. Three toxin extract from three different protease negative strains were given in which
each group received one toxin. Mice in each group were treated with (0.5 ) ml of stage I toxin A that
administrated intraperitoneally ,while each mice in the control group administrated (0.5)ml of sterile PBS . The
animals were observed for five days, and record the result of death.

www.iosrjournals.org 49 | Page
 Determination of lethal dose (LD50) of Exotoxin A from Pseudomonasareuginosa26A in mice

2.3.Experimental burn infection [10]

Groups consists of 21 mice ( females). Their ages ranged between (8-12) weeks and weighting (20-25)
gram. They were divided into (3 ) groups . Each group was kept in a separate plastic cage and given food and
water .Anaesthised mice were shaved back involving approximately 30 % of the total body surface , then they
were given a 30-s burn with hot metal .
Group one Immediately after burning approximately 1x 108 live organisms in 0.5 ml of physiological saline
(PBS) were injected subcutaneously in the burned area in the first group .
Group Two : After burning received 1x 108 livebacterial cell then animal received 0.1ml of gentamicin
solution intraperitoneally and a similar volume subcutaneously in the infected burned area, the total dose per
kilogram bodyweight being 100 mg.
Group Three : burned but uninfected control animals received 0.5 ml of sterile PS instead of bacterial
suspension .The animal were observed for 5 day and the result were recorded daily.

2.4.Determination of LD50 of toxin A

The LD50 of toxin was determined according to the Reed and Muench [11], 40 mice were divided in
to 8 group ,the last one used as control, different concentration of purified toxin were prepared (0,05 ,0.1, 0.2
,0.25 ,1.0 ,2.0 and 4.0 μg/ ml by diluted the concentrate toxin with 0.01M Tris- OH. Each group was assigned to
one of dilution, then 0.5 ml of toxin was injected intraperitoneally in mice ,while in control group each mice
were received 0.5 ml of 0.01M Tris- OH. Mice were observed daily for 5 day, then LD50 were determined and
calculated.

III. Results And Discussion

For determination the LD50 of purified toxin A in mice . 40 mice were divided in to 8 group, the last
was used as control. Different concentration of purified toxin A 0,05 ,0.1, 0.2 ,0.25 ,1.0 ,2.0 and 4.0 μg/ ml
were used . Each group was assigned to one of dilution that 0.1 ml of purified toxin A was injected
intraperitoneallyin mice ,while control group were received 0.1 ml of 0.01M Tris- OH. Mice were observed
daily for mortalityfor 5 days.The LD50 of purified toxin A was expressed as micrograms of protein per 20 g of
body weight . Results of injection of purified toxin A have shown that the LD50 of purified toxin A that give
more than 50% lethality of mice was recorded and calculated to be 1μg/ ml in to laboratory mice .

3.1.Histopathological examinationLiver
Histopathological examination of liver in mice injected with higher doses of purified toxin A 1.5 and 2
μg /ml reveal that there is congestion of central vein , enlargement and vaculation of hepatocyte which lead to
stenosis of sinusoid with infilteration of inflamatory cells as shown in Figures(1 and 2) . In higher doses 3 and
4 μg /ml there is area of necrotizing hepatocyte with absence of sinusoid and presence of mitotic figure . Also
extensive mononuclear cell infilterationand presence of apoptotic hepatocyte is also seen in some part of liver
in higher doses as shown in figure (3). Liver in control group injected with 0.1ml of 0.01MTris-OH
intraperitoneally show normal tissue section as seen in Figure(4).

Spleen and kidney

Histopathological examination of spleen in mice injected with higher doses of toxin 1.5 and 2 μg/ml in
mice , reveal that there is depletion of lymphoid follicles in spleen with presence of large number
megakaryocyte as seen in figure(5). In higher doses 3 and 4 there is depletion of lymphoid follicles and
precipitation of amyloid like substances as shown in figure (6) . spleen in control group injected with 0.1 ml of
0.01M Tris-OH intraperitoneally revealed normal tissue structure as shown in figure (7).
In kidney, at doses 1.5 and 2 μg/ml there is necrotic area and infilteration of inflammatory cells in the
brankeyma as seen in figure (8). In higher doses 3 and 4 there is atrophy of glomululartafts , sloughing and
destruction of epithelial lining urinary tubules and enlargement of poman space lead to stenosis of lumen also
infilteration of inflamatory cells as shown in figure ( 9). Alsothere is formation of hyaline cast in some part of
kidney in higher doses as see in figure (10). kidney in control group injected with 0.1 ml of 0.01M Tris-OH
intraperitoneally revealed normal tissue structure as shown in figure (11).
Results of injection of purified toxin A in mice have shown that the LD50 of purified toxin A that give more
than 50% lethality of mice was calculated to be 1μg/ ml. Tzonget al [12] reported that subcutaneous
administration of truncated part of PE(576–613) at dose of 250 μg was still nontoxic to 5- and 9-week-old ICR
mice, while the native PE was lethal at a dose of 0.5 – 1μg respectively. Also[13,14] noted that native PE
inhibits protein synthesis both in vivo and in vitro by adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-ribosyltransferase activity
on elongation factor 2 and was lethal at a dose of 1μg when injected in to laboratory mice. While [15,8 ]
noted that the purified toxin had a mouse median lethal dose of 0.1- 0.15 μg /22g mouse when injected
intraperitoneally, also Michael and Barbara [16] reported that LD50 of toxin A was 0.2 μg/ ml when

www.iosrjournals.org 50 | Page
 Determination of lethal dose (LD50) of Exotoxin A from Pseudomonasareuginosa26A in mice

injected intrapertoneally to mice. Ali et al[10] show that purified toxin had a mouse median lethal dose of 300
ng /22g mouse when injected intraperitoneally.
Histopathological examination of liver in mice injected with higher doses of PE 1.5 and 2μg / ml reveal
that toxin A exerted a marked effect on the liver characterize by the presence of vaculated hepatocyte with
infilteration of inflamatory cells. [17, 18]study that the histopathology and serum enzyme levels in mice
inoculated with Pseudomonas aeruginosaexotoxin A intravenously in which toxin A exert their effect on the
liver. The microscopic lesions caused in the liver by a single injection of two 50% lethal doses (LD50) of toxin
2.3μg were characterized by cellular swelling, and fatty change within 4-8 hrs and near total hepatocellular
necrosis at 48 hr. Hepatic necrosis was accompanied by a parallel rise in serum levels of aspartate and alanine
aminotransferases and alkaline phosphatase. A single injection of 5 dose of (LD50) elicited similar but
somewhat more rapid degeneration. Also [19] noted that administration of the higher dose of PEA cause
lethality in mice within 16 hrs. The liver characterized by hepatocyte degeneration, also release of liverenzymes
was preceded by the appearance of cytosolic oligonucleosome-boundDNA within the liver that was significantly
enhanced 6.5 hrs after PEA administration. Internucleosomal DNA fragmentationas a measure of programmed
cell death was also demonstratedon an agarose gel.
Histopathological examination of liver in mice injected with higher doses of PE 3 and 4μg /ml reveal
degeneration of liver characterize by the presence of vacuolated hepatocyte and extensive infiltration of
inflammatory cells, in addition to the presence of apoptotic cells. The prevalence of apoptotic cell death in PEA-
induced liver injury could be explained by mechanisms of sensitization toward TNF. These include significant
inhibition of protein synthesis in the case of PEA-induced liver damage. Furthermore, cytotoxic lymphocytes
may contribute to the apoptotic morphology in PEA-induced liver injury, by producing perforin[20, 21].
Shafikhaniet al .[22] reveal that transmission electron micrographs of mouse livers excised12 h
following injection of higher doses of PEA show that the dying cells were hepatocytes. They diedby apoptosis
and necrosis whereasneither apoptosis nor necrosis was seen in livers of saline-treatedmice. Necrotic liver areas
contained infiltrated polymorphonuclear neutrophils . Jens et al.[19] noted that pretreatment mice with
Cl2MBP liposomes strongly attenuated liver injury induced by PEA. This pretreatment restricted liver damage to
some areas of focal confluent necrosis , which were not sufficient to cause significant release of transaminases
while the livers of PEA-treated mice contained foci of confluent necrosis and cells with apoptotic morphology.
Results of injection of purified toxin A in mice have shown that the LD50 of purified toxin A that give
more than 50% lethality of mice was calculated to be (1) μg/ ml. Tzonget al [12]reported that subcutaneous
administration of truncated part of PE(576–613) at dose of 250 μg was still nontoxic to 5- and 9-week-old ICR
mice, while the native PE was lethal at a dose of (0.5 – 1)μg respectively. Also [13,14] noted that native PE
inhibits protein synthesis both in vivo and in vitro by adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-ribosyltransferase activity
on elongation factor 2 and was lethal at a dose of (1)μg when injected in to laboratory mice. While [15, 8]
noted that the purified toxin had a mouse median lethal dose of 0.1- 0.15 μg /22g mouse when injected
intraperitoneally, also [16] reported that LD50 of toxin A was 0.2 μg/ ml when injected intrapertoneally to
mice. Ali et al .[10] show that purified toxin had a mouse median lethal dose of 300 ng /22g mouse when
injected intraperitoneally.

References
[1] M.R. Fogle. (2012).The role of exotoxin A in the pathogensis of pseudomonas aeruginosa burn wound infection .Texas Tech
university Electronic Teses and Dissertations. Taxes Library Web: www.handle.net/2346/17059.
[2] E.H. Karimi;P. Pourkashanifand H. Chanatpishe. Frequency of pseudomonasaeruginosa serotypes in burn wound infection and
their resistance to antibiotics. Burns.28, 2002. 340 – 348.
[3] P.V. Applgren;K. Bjornhagen; C.E. Bragderyd and U. Ransjo.A prospective study of infections in burn patients.Burn.28 ,2002. 3 4-
46.
[4] U.S.AltoParlak; M.N. Erol; F.C. Akcayand A. Kadanali.The time – related changes of anti Microbiol resistance patterns and
predominant bacterial profiles of burn wounds and body flora of burned patients. Burns. 30. 2004. 660 – 664.
[5] S. Guadarrama;E.D. Pulcini; S.C. Broadaway and B.H. Pyle. Pseudomonas aeruginosa growth and production of exotoxin A in
static and modeled microgravity environment Gravit& space. Biol. 18 (2), 2005. 85 – 86.
[6] M. Pollack . The role of exotoxin., A in pseudomonas disease and immunity. J. infect. Dis. 5 , 1983. 979 – 984.
[7] F. Danielle, F. Environmental parameters of growth of Microbiology Lab report 2, medical publishing division, New York, 2007.
[8] P.Y. Susan.; L.T. Patricia and M. Rod.Structure function analysis of the catalytic domain of exotoxin A from pseudomonas
aeruginosa. J. Biochem. 385. 2005. 667 – 675.
[9] B.H. Saleh,E.F.Al-Jumaily and S.M. Hussain. Production and Purification of Exotoxin Aextracted from social strains of
Pseudomonas aeruginosain Iraq.Trends in Biotechnology.1. 2012. 15-23.
[10] M. Ali; K. Jamshid;M. Davood; J. Aziz ; A. Masoud and K. Nazanin. Active immunization using exotoxin A confers protection
against pseudomonas aeruginosinfection in a mouse burn model BMC. Micrbiol. . 2009. 1-10.
[11] L. Reed L and H.A. Muench .Simple method for estimating 50% endpoint.Am J Hyg,25. 1938. 493-497.
[12] Y.C.Tzong ;P.L.Chia; C.L.Chien and F.H. Cho. A non toxic pseudomonas exotoxin A induce active immunity and passive
protective antibody against pseudomonas exotoxin A intoxication . J. Biomed. Sci. 6. 1999. 357-363.
[13] S. Armstrong and A.R. Merrill.Application of fluorometric assay for characterization of catalytic competency of domain III
fragment of pseudomonasaeruginosa exotoxin A. Biochm. 292. 2001. 26 – 33.

www.iosrjournals.org 51 | Page
 Determination of lethal dose (LD50) of Exotoxin A from Pseudomonasareuginosa26A in mice
[14] M.D. Robert and S. Debell . Production of exotoxin A by pseudomonas aeruginosa in a chemically defined medium. Infect.
Immun. 24. 1. 1979. 132-138.
[15] E.O. Dennis ; C.S. Jerald and H.I. Barbara. Toxin A Deficient mutants of pseudomonas aeruginosa PA103: isolation and
characterization. Infect. Immun. 28, 3. 1980. 899 – 908.
[16] L.V. Michael and H.I. Barbara.Comparative toxicities of diphtheria toxin and pseudomonasaeruginosa exotoxin A: Evidence for
different cell receptors. J. Gen. Microbiol 108. 1978. 333-334.
[17] H. Papadaki; G. Dimitracopoulos ; D. Bonicos and E.D. Anastassion. Histological alteration in mice induced by pseudomonas
exotoxin A. 5.1. 1990. 7-18.
[18] R. Olgerts; A. Frank and H. Shackel ford. PseudomonasareuginosaExotoxin in mice histopathology and serum enzyme changes. J.
Med. Microbiol. 3. 1976. 253 – 255.
[19] S. Jens; A. Sabine; B. Renate; L. Michael. and T. Gisa.A cute hepatotoxicity of pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin A in mice
depend on T cells and TNF. J. Immun. : 161. 1998. 5745 – 5754.
[20] C.ChienChao,H. Hans; L. Hsiao; C. Tung – Chung and H. Ten-Te.Pseudomonasaeruginosaexotoxin A induced Hepatotoxicity: an
animal model in rats, J. vet. Med. Sci, 71. 1. 2002.1-8.
[21] V. Jendrossek; H. Grassme and I. Muller.Pseudomonas aeruginosainduces apoptosis involve mitochondria and stress activated
protein kinases. Infect. Immun. 69. 2001. 2675-2683.
[22] S.H. Shafikhani ; C. Morales and J. Engel. ThePseudomonas aeruginosatype III secreted toxin Exo T is necessary and sufficient to
induce apoptosis in epithelial cells. Cell.Microbiol.10. 2008. 994 – 1007.

Figure (1) :Histopathological section of liver Figure (2):Histopathological section of liver in

in mice injected with 0.1 ml of purified toxin mice injected with 0.1 ml of purified toxin at
at concentration 1.5μg/ml showed congestion concentration 2μg/ml showed presence of vaculated
hepatocyte (blue arrow) in addition to extensive
of blood vessel (blue arrow) with infilteration
mononuclear cell infilteration ( red arrow) .( x400)
of inflamatory cell( yellow arrow) and .H & E.
presence of vaculated hepatocyte(red
arrow).(x400) .H & E.

Figure (3) :Histopathological section of liver in mice injected Figure (4): Histopathological section of liver in control
with 0.1 ml of purified toxin at concentration 4μg/ml showed group injected with 0.1 ml of PBS showed normal
congestion of blood vessel( red arrow) and presence of tissue section contain central vein (red arrow) and
apoptotic hepatocyte(blue arrow) .(x400).H & E. hepatic cord( blue arrow) .(x100).H &E.

www.iosrjournals.org 52 | Page
 Determination of lethal dose (LD50) of Exotoxin A from Pseudomonasareuginosa26A in mice

Figure (5) :Histopathological section of spleen in mice Figure (6) :Histopathological section of spleen in
injected with 0.1 ml of purified toxin at concentration mice injected with 0.1 ml of purified toxin at
2μg/ml showed depletion of lymphoid follicule(blue arrow) concentration 3μg/ml showed precipitation of
and presence of megakaryocyte ( red arrow).( x400) .H & amyloid like substances ( red arrow).(x 400).H &E.
E.

Figure (7): Histopathological section of spleen in control Figure (8) :Histopathological section of Kidney in
group injected with 0.1 ml of Tris-oH showed normal mice injected with 0.1 ml of purified toxin at
tissue section consistof white pulp (green arrow) and red concentration 2μg/ml showed necrotic area
pulp ( blue arrow) .(x 100). infiltered with inflamatory cells(red arrow)also
H&E presence of inflamatory cells cuffing of the blood
vessels ( blue arrow).(x100).H & E.

Figure (9) : Histopathological section of Kidney in Figure (10) :Histopathological section of Kidney in
mice injected with 0.1 ml of purified toxin at mice injected with 0.1 ml of purified toxin at
concentration 4μg/ml showed atrophy of concentration 3μg/ml showed destruction and
glomerular tafts(blue arrow) and enlargement of
slouphing of epithelial lining urinary tubules with
epithelial lining urinary tubules lead to stenosis of
lumen(red arrow).(x400) .H & E. formation of hyaline cast blue arrow). (x200) .H & E

www.iosrjournals.org 53 | Page
Determination of lethal dose (LD50) of Exotoxin A from Pseudomonasareuginosa26A in mice

Figure (11): HistopathologicalsectionofKidney in control group injected

with 0.1 ml of Tris-oH showed normal tissue section consist of
glomeruli (red arrow) and urinary tubules ( blue arrow) . (x100).H &
E.

www.iosrjournals.org 54 | Page