Vpvs Aplicatipons

ID Number: 2005026
Vp/Vs Analysis of Rohtas and Kaimur Formations, Son Valley,

Vindhyan Basin
Nancy Jain, Manoj Kumar, D K Srivastava and D N Singh

Frontier Basin, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
Email: nancy.jain123@gmail.com
Abstract
The presence of compressible fluid or gas in pore space of rock and fractures are known to have
considerable influence on parameters like acoustic velocities. The ratio of compressional wave velocity
to shear wave velocity (Vp/Vs) is a good tool in identifying fluid type, since the compressional wave
velocity decreases and shear wave velocity increases with the increase of light hydrocarbon saturation.
The analysis of Vp/Vs ratio, Poisson’s ratio and density within different units of Rohtas and Kaimur
formations were carried out in drilled wells Damoh#C, Nohta#A and Jabera#C in Son Valley, Vindhyan
Basin. Various cross plots including Vp/Vs versus density, Poisson’s ratio versus depth, density versus
depth, Poisson’s ratio versus density , Vp/Vs versus DTC were used to identify potential gas bearing
zones as well as presence of fractures. Fractures identified based on the present analysis has more or
less corroborated the results obtained from XRMI logs. The potential gas bearing reservoirs identified
in these wells have been validated through this study and additional interesting zones have been
identified.
Keywords: Vp/Vs ratio, Poisson’s ratio, fractures
Introduction
The Son Valley, Vindhyan Basin has come to the forefront of hydrocarbon exploration after the recent
significant discovery of gas within Proterozoic fractured reservoirs of Lower Vindhyan Rohtas Limestone
and Upper Vindhyan Kaimur Sandstone spread over a large area in the exploration acreage (Fig.1).
The reservoirs are unconventional with very low primary porosity and ultra-low permeability. Gas
accumulation and flow potential is largely dependent on the presence of fractures. Since, the presence
of compressible fluid or gas in pore space of rock and fractures are known to have considerable
influence on parameters like acoustic velocities, the ratio of compressional wave velocity to shear wave
velocity, Vp/Vs, is a good tool in identifying fluid type. The present paper brings out the results of the
study carried out to calibrate the known fractured gas reservoirs based on analysis of cross plots using
Vp/Vs ratio, Poisson’s Ratio, density and sonic logs and an attempt to trace out the similar gas pools in
other drilled wells.
Principle
In elastic and isotropic medium, the compressional and shear wave velocities are related to the dynamic
elastic moduli with the relations:
Vp=√ {(K+4μ /3)/ρ} 1 - equation 1
Vs=√ (μ /ρ) 2 - equation 2
where;
Vp and Vs are compressional and shear wave velocities expressed in Km/sec, K and μ are bulk modulus
and shear modulus expressed in GPa (Giga Pascals), ρ is the bulk density in g/cc (matrix, fluid and
porosity combined)
 Presence of low density gas in the pore space of a reservoir rock decreases the rock density
while there is no change in shear modulus (since fluids do not support shear). Gas, being very
compressional and has large bulk modulus thereby, reduces the contribution of pore fluid to the
overall bulk modulus of the formation, and therefore, Vp of the acoustic wave decreases (eq-
1). In the case of shear wave, due to low-density gas, its velocity increases slightly (eq-2). Thus
the net effect on Vp/Vs ratio, if gas is present in the pore space, it will decrease which, is around
1.58 to 1.6.It increases slightly beyond this value in unconsolidated sands and at low effective
stress regimes.
 Compressional waves (Vp) are primarily affected by oblique fractures—those with dip angles
between 15° and 85°—while (Vs) shear waves are primarily affected by horizontal or near-
horizontal fractures. Thus, variations in the Vp/Vs ratio can be seen.
Poisson's ratio (n) is the ratio between strain in the direction of principal stress and strain in either
transverse direction, and is defined in terms of P- and S-wave velocities by the following:
where;
n = Poisson's ratio, a = Vp/Vs, Vp = P-wave velocity, Vs = S-wave velocity
For gas, Poisson’s ratio lies between 0 and 0.25. However, some well log measurements, especially in
slow gas formations produce a Poisson’s ratio as large as 0.3.
Methodology
The analysis was carried out using the data from three exploratory wells, namely Damoh#C, Nohta#A
and Jabera#C. Initially, the Vp/Vs, density and Poisson’s ratio (obtained from wire line logs), for different
formations / units were plotted against the depth, which led to the identification of interesting zones. To
validate these interesting zones, Poisson’s ratio versus density, Vp/Vs versus density and Vp/Vs versus
DTC were plotted. The observed values indicated the presence of the gas as well as the fractures. The
results were calibrated with the open and partial fractures seen in XRMI log for the particular intervals.
Results and Conclusions

The details of observations and analysis are placed as Fig. 1 to 10. The major findings are enumerated
below
In well Nohta#A: The interval 1520-1667m flowed gas on barefoot testing. The present analysis
suggests that the interval 1541-1574m seems to be principal gas contributing zone with the lowering of
PR: 0.23-0.25, Vp/Vs: 1.61-1.62,density: 2.625-2.675g/cc.
The gas bearing layers of wells Nohta#A and Damoh#C may comprise Vp/Vs around 1.6 and PR: 0.2-
0.3.
In well Damoh#C:
Higher values of Vp/Vs (1.79-1.95) and PR (0.27-0.32) were observed in the gas bearing interval of
Upper Rohtas (1330-1347m).Relatively low values of Vp/Vs (1.65-1.9) and PR (0.225-0.32) were
observed in the zone 1374-1400m. Although, the zone showed no activity during testing, the analysis
suggests that thin layer within tested zones may be gas bearing, having lower Vp/Vs values.
Interval 1700-1725m (Middle Rohtas unit), seems to be interesting having Vp/Vs: 1.59.1.62, PR: 0.172-
0.25 with appreciable partially open fractures
Interval 1205-1240m within Basal Kaimur Sandstone, having Vp/Vs: 1.5-1.62, PR: 0.03-0.25 and few
partially open fractures appear as the most promising zone.
In well Jabera#C:
Interval 2088-2110m shows Vp/Vs: 1.61 -1.9 with scattered partially open fractures, appear to have thin
gas bearing layers. This is corroborated by the continuous feeble flow of gas observed during initial
testing. Intervals 1580-1610m (Basal Kaimur) seems to be most promising with Vp/Vs: 1.5-1.6 and PR:
0.03-0.23 with appreciable partially open fractures. Interval 1500-1530 m (Vp/Vs: 1.61-1.62, PR: 0.18-
0.225 with appreciable partially open and open fractures) within lower Kaimur section also seems to be
interesting. Both these zones yielded continuous feeble flow of gas during combined testing. Based on
the above analysis, an additional untested zone has been identified in the interval 1540-1550m (Vp/Vs:
1.55-1.6, PR: 0.15-0.25 with appreciable partially open and open fractures.
The fractures identified on basis of Vp/Vs and density plots corroborate with the fractures seen on XRMI
logs to a considerable extent.
These evaluated parameters can also be used for identification of interesting layers for testing, if shear
wave is recorded along with other logs.
Acknowlegements
The authors are grateful to Director (E) ONGC for his kind permission to publish this paper. The authors
also express their gratitude to Basin Manager, Frontier Basin, ONGC, for his guidance and continued
motivation for the study. The views expressed in the paper are of the authors only and not necessarily
of the organization they represent.
References
1. P.K.Jain, C.V.Jambhekar, P.B.Pandey, 2012 9th Biennial International Conference and
Exposition on Petroleum Geophysics, Identification of gas using Vp/Vs vis-à-vis Poisson’s ratio
2. Susan L.M.Miller, 1992 CREWES Research Report Volume 4, Well log analysis of Vp and Vs
in carbonates
3. Rao R.V., 2004 5th Conference and Exposition on Petroleum Geophysics, Hyderabad, India PP
167-169, Dependence of Vp/Vs vs. DTC Crossplot Technique for Gas-Water Identification on
Degree of Compaction and Effective Stress
4. Yexin Liu, SoftMirrors Ltd., Calgary, Canada ,2012 Geoconvention 2012: Vision, Shear velocity
prediction and its rock mechanic implications
Fig.1 Geological
map of Vindhyan Basin showing location of wells in Son Valley
Fig 2: Crossplot of Vp/Vs ratio and density depth for Rohtas Formation-Upper Unit (1514-
1885m), Nohta#A well
Fig 3: Crossplot of Poisson’s Ratio and Vp/Vs ratio versus depth for Rohtas Formation-Upper Unit
(1514-1885m), Nohta#A well
Fig 4: Crossplots for Zone (1541-1574m) of Rohtas Formation-Upper Unit, Nohta#A well
Fig 5: XRMI log for interval (1547-1551m) of Rohtas Formation-Upper Unit, Nohta#A well
Fig 6: Crossplot of Vp/Vs ratio and density versus depth for Kaimur Formation (1130-1250m),
Damoh#C well
Fig 7: Crossplot of Poisson’s ratio and Vp/Vs ratio versus depth for Kaimur Formation (1130-1250m),
Damoh#C well
Fig 8: Crossplots for Zone (1205-1240m) of Kaimur Formation, Damoh#C well

Fig 8: Crossplot of Vp/Vs ratio and density versus depth for Kaimur Formation (1435-1610m),
Jabera#C well
Fig 9: Crossplot of Poisson’s Ratio and Vp/Vs ratio versus depth for Kaimur Formation (1435-1610m),
Jabera#C well
Fig10: Crossplots for Zone (1580-1610m) of Kaimur Formation, Jabera#C well

Vpvs Aplicatipons

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Vpvs Aplicatipons

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Vpvs Aplicatipons

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

ID Number: 2005026

Vp/Vs Analysis of Rohtas and Kaimur Formations, Son Valley,

Nancy Jain, Manoj Kumar, D K Srivastava and D N Singh

Keywords: Vp/Vs ratio, Poisson’s ratio, fractures

Vp=√ {(K+4μ /3)/ρ} 1 - equation 1

Vs=√ (μ /ρ) 2 - equation 2

n = Poisson's ratio, a = Vp/Vs, Vp = P-wave velocity, Vs = S-wave velocity

Results and Conclusions

Fig 8: Crossplots for Zone (1205-1240m) of Kaimur Formation, Damoh#C well

Fig10: Crossplots for Zone (1580-1610m) of Kaimur Formation, Jabera#C well

You might also like