SBUX - 4M 2019-05-15 (KDR) - Revised
SBUX - 4M 2019-05-15 (KDR) - Revised
SBUX - 4M 2019-05-15 (KDR) - Revised
SBUX
MEANING
Definition: Is it understandable, well within your Circle of Competence?
Starbucks:
Starbucks is a vertically integrated premium coffee retailing company.
They source their premium coffee beans, roast them and serve brewed specialty coffee mixes through their company owne
I understand how this company does business.
They have about 30,000 stores as of 2019 world wide. It’s a solid business with clear demand for premium coffee.
Market share of Starbucks is 57% of the total café market. They dominate this space. Period.
Solid ROIC numbers of 35% and above. This is far above its retail food competition having between 7% to 15% ROIC.
This company will continue to gush cash even if growth might slow down.
MISSION:
Starbucks mission is to be the "third place" between home and the office. "the Starbucks Experience" Not just selling coffe
By and large this has succeeded. They are the market leader, having started the premium coffee outlets.
Before Starbucks, there were coffee shops. Then Starbucks came and redefined the "coffee experience" by creating
a reliable and consistent coffee ambiance, innovative coffee hot and cold drinks, where people can linger, talk and meet.
Every other coffee company benchmarks against Starbucks.
MOAT
Definition: Does the company have sustainable competitive advantage over its competitors?
Is it INTRINSIC (it is built-in, or is in the nature of the company, the advantage cannot be separated from the company; and
Is it DURABLE (expensive or difficult to overcome the intrinsic advantage)
MANAGEMENT
Definition: Is the company run by owner/shareholder-oriented CEO, who has integrity, talent, and honest
1. Starbucks is the café market industry benchmark and standard, and dominate leader with 57% of the market.
It will likely continue to dominate this space of coffee drinks category.
Even in a recession or downturn, demand will not disappear completely as shown in 2007-2009.
A recession will provide another stock buying opportunity after the stock market overreacts to short-term
lower demand from consumers who want to save money in a recession.
People will still want to socialize and meet friends, workmates, and clients.
2. The strong brand moat will continue to provide premium high margins, and they continue to look for premium
concepts like Starbucks Reserve Roastery, Teavana and others
The world is getting increasingly hooked on coffee for its morning pick-up, afternoon break, or evening after dinner drink.
REBUTTAL:
Growth globally is still very strong. With China and the rest of Asia continuing to be a p
Americas is only 68% of revnues, China and Asia is 18%, EMEA is 4% and Channels are
Americas is 17,454 stores, China and Asia is 8,530 stores. This means China and Asia c
What is the global potential projections?
Increasingly affluent Asian and Chinese middle class will want to drink Starbucks Coffee
Growth areas include licensed coffee drinks for supermarkets through Nestle. Starbuck
Revenues through licensing -- no capital required increase revenues. High ROIC!
REBUTTAL:
There is actually a growing trend towards coffee consumption.
China and India are just about to join this trend, so it will keep growing.
GCK NOTES:
1) do back testing of Margin of Safety for Starbucks going back to 2007,2008, 2009 10-K vs. Stock price declines
xperience" by creating
e can linger, talk and meet.
ated from the company; and is not typically characteristic of other competitors?)
SOURCE:
Brand survey Ranking #57 Globally ; Brand value in US$B=9.4 Billion (by Interbrand)
Market share of Leading Coffee Players in the Coffee/Café Industry (Forbes)
ake it hard to duplicate? How many users?
and honest
7% of the market.
o short-term
09/30/2015 09/30/2014
1,611,400,000.00 1,843,800,000.00
2,347,500,000.00 2,048,300,000.00
69% 90%
keep growing.
s. Stock price declines
take note that the roic
of FINBOX.IO and Ycharts
are different from one another
BIG FIVE NUMBERS: (must growing at 10% per year consistently for 10 years, compare them to 1-year, 3-year, 5-year if its s
Looking at the Growth Rates of these companies (percentages)
Source: MSN Money or Yahoo Finance
(source: FINBOX.com/SBUX/explorer)
* It is important to compare this against competitors in its market segment. E.g. Dell vs. Gateway; Walmart vs. Target vs. C
TEN-CAP METHOD:
= OWNER EARNINGS (SUM TOTAL) $9,156,500,000.00
Ten-Cap Price $91,565,000,000.00
Sample:
Year Free Cash Flow
0 $9,961,400,000.00
1 $11,057,154,000.00
2 $12,273,440,940.00
3 $13,623,519,443.40
4 $15,122,106,582.17
5 $16,785,538,306.21
6 $18,631,947,519.90
7 $20,681,461,747.09
8 $22,956,422,539.26
Step One:
EPS x (1+ Growth Rate) (repeated 10 times)
= Future 10-Year EPS
Future - EPS
Year 0 $3.24
Year 1 $3.60
Year 2 $3.99
Year 3 $4.43
Year 4 $4.92
Year 5 $5.46
Year 6 $6.06
Year 7 $6.73
Year 8 $7.47
Year 9 $8.29
Year 10 $9.20
Step Two:
Future 10-Year Earnings Per Share X PE $9.20
= Future 10-Year Share Price $220.79
ASSET METHOD:
What are the value of the assets? Cash, Land, etc., apart from its Profits or Earnings
for example
Number of Shares Outstanding: 1,382,700,000
D. Del Rosario
/SBUX/explorer)
g. Dell vs. Gateway; Walmart vs. Target vs. Costco vs. Amazon(?)
Source: SBUX 10-K Year 2018 (FY ending Sep 30, 2018)
2018 Cash Flow Statement Line 2; page 73 (find it in Cash Flow statemepage 73 of SBUX 10-K 2018.pdf
2018 Cash Flow Statement Line 4 (find it in Cash Flow statemepage 73 of SBUX 10-K 2018.pdf
2018 Cash Flow Statement Line 14 (find it in Cash Flow statemepage 73 of SBUX 10-K 2018.pdf
2018 Cash Flow Statement Line 15 (find it in Cash Flow statemepage 73 of SBUX 10-K 2018.pdf
2018 Income Statement Line 20 (find it in Income Statement)page 73 of SBUX 10-K 2018.pdf
2018 Cash Flow Statement Line "Property, Plant and (find it in Cash flows from Invpage 73 of SBUX 10-K 2018.pdf
(add them whether they are negative or positive numbers)
Note: Ten-Cap price does not take into account growth rates of the company. It only accounts for Owner Earnings in 2015
Company Valuation
FY 2018
MacroTrends.Net (Calculated Compounding) 3.21
62.94%
(if we want to change this %, it will increase the hurdle rate or lower it)
increasing this hurdle rate, will lower the Estimated Value of the company
which increases the effective Margin of Safety
1 + Growth Rate
111%
111%
111%
111%
111%
111%
111%
111%
111%
111%
111%
24
ESTIMATED VALUE OF COMPANY in 10 YEARS
shares
2018 Balance Sheet Statement Line 10; page 71 Debt went up from $3,932,600,000 in 2017. WHY?
Rule #1
Meaning Moat Mgmt Predictability
DONE Score
DONE 62 76 93 0 68
DONE
DONE Date Symbol Price Change Change% Sticker
05/15/2019 SBUX 77.06 0.38 0.50% 88.32
ROIC from
Sep-08 Sep-09 Sep-10
(ycharts)
ROIC % 8.62% 10.62% 24.13%
Revenue from
Sep-08 Sep-09 Sep-10
(ycharts)
Revenue % 9.57%
Compounded 9.06%
EPS diluted
from
Sep-08 Sep-09 Sep-10
(ycharts and
macrotrends)
Compounded 31.16%
FY 2017 FY 2016
1.97 1.92
2.60%
TTM Net
Date Stock Price EPS PE Ratio Year EPS
5/15/2019 77.76 33.66 2018 3.24
3/31/2019 74.34 $2.31 32.18 2017 1.97
12/31/2018 64.07 $2.25 28.47 2016 1.9
9/30/2018 56.24 $3.21 17.52 2015 1.82
6/30/2018 48 $3.19 15.05 2014 1.35
3/31/2018 56.59 $3.05 18.55 2013 0.01
12/31/2017 55.83 $3.03 18.43 2012 0.9
9/30/2017 51.94 $1.97 26.36 2011 0.81
6/30/2017 56.13 $1.97 28.49 2010 0.62
3/31/2017 55.98 $2.01 27.85 2009 0.26
12/31/2016 52.99 $1.95 27.17 2008 0.22
9/30/2016 51.43 $1.90 27.07 2007 0.44
6/30/2016 54.07 $1.79 30.21 2006 0.36
3/31/2016 56.32 $1.69 33.32 2005 0.31
12/31/2015 56.44 $1.63 34.63
9/30/2015 53.27 $1.82 29.27
6/30/2015 50.11 $1.78 28.23
3/31/2015 44.11 $1.70 25.95
12/31/2014 38.08 $1.65 23.08
9/30/2014 34.88 $1.36 25.74
6/30/2014 35.65 $1.29 27.74
3/31/2014 33.68 $1.23 27.49
12/31/2013 35.84 $1.20 29.87
9/30/2013 35.08 $1.13 31.05
6/30/2013 29.77 $1.05 28.49
3/31/2013 25.8 $0.99 26.19
12/31/2012 24.2 $0.93 26.02
9/30/2012 22.79 $0.90 25.46
6/30/2012 23.87 $0.90 26.52
3/31/2012 24.94 $0.87 28.83
12/31/2011 20.46 $0.84 24.5
9/30/2011 16.52 $0.81 20.39
6/30/2011 17.43 $0.76 22.93
3/31/2011 16.25 $0.72 22.72
12/31/2010 14.07 $0.69 20.54
9/30/2010 11.14 $0.62 17.97
6/30/2010 10.54 $0.54 19.7
3/31/2010 10.49 $0.50 20.97
12/31/2009 9.96 $0.38 26.57
9/30/2009 8.92 $0.26 34.31
217.77% 21.20%
Calculated
Compound Compounding
Growth ing %
64% 3.210595917 19.7%
4% 2.682202103
4% 2.240770345
35% 1.871988592
13400% 1.563900244
-99% 1.306516495
11% 1.091492477
31% 0.911856706
138% 0.761785051
18% 0.636411905
-50% 0.531672436
22% 0.44417079
16% 0.37107
0.31
Sep-18
45.17%
Sep-18
24.72
10.41%
10.41%
Sep-18
3.24
64%
64.47%
RULE #1 Valuation Methods
RESEARCHER/ANALYST: Kate D. Del Rosario
BIG FIVE NUMBERS: (must growing at 10% per year consistently for 10 years, compare them to 1-year, 3-year, 5-year if its s
Looking at the Growth Rates of these companies (percentages)
Source: MSN Money or Yahoo Finance
(source: FINBOX.com/SBUX/explorer)
* It is important to compare this against competitors in its market segment. E.g. Dell vs. Gateway; Walmart vs. Target vs. C
Sample:
Year Free Cash Flow
0 $360,403,000.00
1 $518,619,917.00
2 $746,294,060.56
3 $1,073,917,153.15
4 $1,545,366,783.38
5 $2,223,782,801.29
6 $3,200,023,451.05
7 $4,604,833,746.07
8 $6,626,355,760.59
Step One:
EPS x (1+ Growth Rate) (repeated 10 times)
= Future 10-Year EPS
Future - EPS
Year 0 $0.38
Year 1 $0.55
Year 2 $0.79
Year 3 $1.13
Year 4 $1.63
Year 5 $2.34
Year 6 $3.37
Year 7 $4.86
Year 8 $6.99
Year 9 $10.05
Year 10 $14.47
Step Two:
Future 10-Year Earnings Per Share X PE $14.47
= Future 10-Year Share Price $347.22
shares (source: SBUX 2006 10-K) 2006 Income Statement Line 30; page 39
/SBUX/explorer)
g. Dell vs. Gateway; Walmart vs. Target vs. Costco vs. Amazon(?)
Source: SBUX 10-K Year 2018 (FY ending Sep 30, 2018)
2006 Cash Flow Statement Line 2; page 41 (find it in Cash Flow statemepage 41 of SBUX 2006 10-K.pdf
2006 Cash Flow Statement Line 5; page 41 (find it in Cash Flow statemepage 41 of SBUX 2006 10-K.pdf
No accounts receivable on Cash Flow Statement, its reflected in the Explanation page 56 of SBUX 2006 10-K.pdf
2006 Cash Flow Statement Line 16; page 41 (find it in Cash Flow statemepage 41 of SBUX 2006 10-K.pdf
2006 Income Statement Line 18; page 39 (find it in Income Statement)page 23 of SBUX 2006 10-K.pdf
2006 Cash Flow Statement Line 28; page 41 (find it in Cash flows from Invpage 41 of SBUX 2006 10-K.pdf
(add them whether they are negative or positive numbers)
Note: Ten-Cap price does not take into account growth rates of the company. It only accounts for Owner Earnings in 2015
Company Valuation
Comment: this is not yet the correct PE; needs to check ycharts graph for the average
Rule #1 Toolbox (2006/12/31)
(if we want to change this %, it will increase the hurdle rate or lower it) DO NOT CHANGE THIS
increasing this hurdle rate, will lower the Estimated Value of the company
which increases the effective Margin of Safety
1 + Growth Rate
144%
144%
144%
144%
144%
144%
144%
144%
144%
144%
144%
24
ESTIMATED VALUE OF COMPANY in 10 YEARS
ROIC from
Sep-96 Sep-97
(ycharts)
ROIC % 8.24% 8.38%
Revenue from
Sep-96 Sep-97
(ycharts)
Revenue (in B) 0.70 0.98
Revenue % 39.76%
Compounded 27.28%
EPS diluted
Sep-96 Sep-97
from (ycharts)
EPS % 20%
Compounded 55.12%
5/15/2019 77.76
3/31/2019 74.34 $2.31
12/31/2018 64.07 $2.25
9/30/2018 56.24 $3.21
6/30/2018 48 $3.19
3/31/2018 56.59 $3.05
12/31/2017 55.83 $3.03
9/30/2017 51.94 $1.97
6/30/2017 56.13 $1.97
3/31/2017 55.98 $2.01
12/31/2016 52.99 $1.95
9/30/2016 51.43 $1.90
6/30/2016 54.07 $1.79
3/31/2016 56.32 $1.69
12/31/2015 56.44 $1.63
9/30/2015 53.27 $1.82
6/30/2015 50.11 $1.78
3/31/2015 44.11 $1.70
12/31/2014 38.08 $1.65
9/30/2014 34.88 $1.36
6/30/2014 35.65 $1.29
3/31/2014 33.68 $1.23
12/31/2013 35.84 $1.20
9/30/2013 35.08 $1.13
6/30/2013 29.77 $1.05
3/31/2013 25.8 $0.99
12/31/2012 24.2 $0.93
9/30/2012 22.79 $0.90
6/30/2012 23.87 $0.90
3/31/2012 24.94 $0.87
12/31/2011 20.46 $0.84
9/30/2011 16.52 $0.81
6/30/2011 17.43 $0.76
3/31/2011 16.25 $0.72
12/31/2010 14.07 $0.69
9/30/2010 11.14 $0.62
6/30/2010 10.54 $0.54
3/31/2010 10.49 $0.50
12/31/2009 9.96 $0.38
9/30/2009 8.92 $0.26
6/30/2009 6 $0.17
3/31/2009 4.8 $0.06
12/31/2008 4.09 $0.12
9/30/2008 6.42 $0.22
6/30/2008 6.8 $0.32
3/31/2008 7.56 $0.43
12/31/2007 8.84 $0.45
9/30/2007 11.32 $0.44
6/30/2007 11.34 $0.41
3/31/2007 13.55 $0.39
12/31/2006 15.3 $0.38
Sticker MOS PBT
88.32 44.16 10
36.37
80
34.06
29.88
21.59
17.79
19.87
26.02
27.99
34.74
40.81
Sep-05 Sep-06
20.41% 21.28%
Sep-05 Sep-06
6.37 7.79
20.31% 22.26%
22.26%
Sep-05 Sep-06
0.1525 0.355
30% 133%
132.79%
RULE #1 Valuation Methods
RESEARCHER/ANALYST: Kate D. Del Rosario
BIG FIVE NUMBERS: (must growing at 10% per year consistently for 10 years, compare them to 1-year, 3-year, 5-year if its s
Looking at the Growth Rates of these companies (percentages)
Source: MSN Money or Yahoo Finance
(source: ycharts.com)
* It is important to compare this against competitors in its market segment. E.g. Dell vs. Gateway; Walmart vs. Target vs. C
TEN-CAP METHOD:
= OWNER EARNINGS (SUM TOTAL) $533,922,000.00
Ten-Cap Price $5,339,220,000.00
Sample:
Year Free Cash Flow
0 $250,873,000.00
1 $278,469,030.00
2 $309,100,623.30
3 $343,101,691.86
4 $380,842,877.97
5 $422,735,594.54
6 $469,236,509.94
7 $520,852,526.04
8 $578,146,303.90
Step One:
EPS x (1+ Growth Rate) (repeated 10 times)
= Future 10-Year EPS
Future - EPS
Year 0 $0.45
Year 1 $0.66
Year 2 $0.96
Year 3 $1.41
Year 4 $2.06
Year 5 $3.01
Year 6 $4.39
Year 7 $6.42
Year 8 $9.39
Year 9 $13.73
Year 10 $20.08
Step Two:
Future 10-Year Earnings Per Share X PE $20.08
= Future 10-Year Share Price $481.83
shares (source: SBUX 2007 10-K) 2007 Income Statement Line 30; page 42
g. Dell vs. Gateway; Walmart vs. Target vs. Costco vs. Amazon(?)
Source: SBUX 10-K Year 2018 (FY ending Sep 30, 2018)
2007 Cash Flow Statement Line 2; page 44 (find it in Cash Flow stateme
2007 Cash Flow Statement Line 5; page 44 (find it in Cash Flow stateme
No accounts receivable on Cash Flow Statement (find it in Cash Flow stateme
2007 Cash Flow Statement Line 16; page 44 (find it in Cash Flow stateme
2007 Income Statement Line 18; page 42 (find it in Income Statement)
2007 Cash Flow Statement Line 28; page 44 (find it in Cash flows from Inv
(add them whether they are negative or positive numbers)
Note: Ten-Cap price does not take into account growth rates of the company. It only accounts for Owner Earnings in 2015
Company Valuation
(if we want to change this %, it will increase the hurdle rate or lower it)
increasing this hurdle rate, will lower the Estimated Value of the company
which increases the effective Margin of Safety
1 + Growth Rate
146%
146%
146%
146%
146%
146%
146%
146%
146%
146%
146%
24
ESTIMATED VALUE OF COMPANY in 10 YEARS
2007 Balance Sheet Statement Line 11; page 43 Debt is higher than the previous year. Find out why
Price per Share
Meaning Moat Mgmt
$7.12 DONE
$4.40 DONE 0 0 0
$119.10 DONE
$59.55 DONE Date Symbol Price
05/15/2019 SBUX 77.06
ROIC from
(ycharts)
ROIC %
Revenue from
(ycharts)
Revenue (in B)
Revenue %
Compounded
me Buy Price
FY 2018
3.21
63%
Source: MacroTrends.net
Starbucks PE Ratio Historical
Date
5/15/2019
3/31/2019
12/31/2018
9/30/2018
6/30/2018
3/31/2018
DO NOT CHANGE THIS 12/31/2017
9/30/2017
6/30/2017
3/31/2017
12/31/2016
9/30/2016
6/30/2016
3/31/2016
12/31/2015
9/30/2015
6/30/2015
3/31/2015
12/31/2014
9/30/2014
6/30/2014
3/31/2014
12/31/2013
9/30/2013
6/30/2013
3/31/2013
12/31/2012
9/30/2012
6/30/2012
3/31/2012
12/31/2011
9/30/2011
6/30/2011
3/31/2011
12/31/2010
9/30/2010
6/30/2010
3/31/2010
12/31/2009
9/30/2009
6/30/2009
3/31/2009
12/31/2008
9/30/2008
6/30/2008
3/31/2008
12/31/2007
9/30/2007
6/30/2007
3/31/2007
12/31/2006
Change
Change Sticker MOS PBT
%
0.38 0.50% 88.32 44.16 10
6 $0.17 36.37
4.8 $0.06 80
4.09 $0.12 34.06
6.42 $0.22 29.88
6.8 $0.32 21.59
7.56 $0.43 17.79
8.84 $0.45 19.87
11.32 $0.44 26.02
11.34 $0.41 27.99
13.55 $0.39 34.74
15.3 $0.38 40.81
Sep-04 Sep-05 Sep-06 Sep-07
0.4341604111 46.2%
0.2969633455
0.2031213033
0.13893386
0.09503
0.065
RULE #1 Valuation Methods
RESEARCHER/ANALYST: Kate D. Del Rosario
BIG FIVE NUMBERS: (must growing at 10% per year consistently for 10 years, compare them to 1-year, 3-year, 5-year if its s
Looking at the Growth Rates of these companies (percentages)
Source: MSN Money or Yahoo Finance
(source: ycharts.com)
* It is important to compare this against competitors in its market segment. E.g. Dell vs. Gateway; Walmart vs. Target vs. C
TEN-CAP METHOD:
= OWNER EARNINGS (SUM TOTAL) $56,200,000.00
Ten-Cap Price $562,000,000.00
Sample:
Year Free Cash Flow
0 $274,200,000.00
1 $288,184,200.00
2 $302,881,594.20
3 $318,328,555.50
4 $334,563,311.83
5 $351,626,040.74
6 $369,558,968.82
7 $388,406,476.23
8 $408,215,206.51
Step One:
EPS x (1+ Growth Rate) (repeated 10 times)
= Future 10-Year EPS
Future - EPS
Year 0 $0.12
Year 1 $0.13
Year 2 $0.13
Year 3 $0.14
Year 4 $0.15
Year 5 $0.15
Year 6 $0.16
Year 7 $0.17
Year 8 $0.18
Year 9 $0.19
Year 10 $0.20
Step Two:
Future 10-Year Earnings Per Share X PE $0.20
= Future 10-Year Share Price $5.54
shares (source: SBUX 2008 10-K) 2008 Income Statement Line 32; page 45
g. Dell vs. Gateway; Walmart vs. Target vs. Costco vs. Amazon(?)
Source: SBUX 10-K Year 2018 (FY ending Sep 30, 2018)
2008 Cash Flow Statement Line 2; page 47 (find it in Cash Flow stateme
2008 Cash Flow Statement Line 5; page 47 (find it in Cash Flow stateme
No accounts receivable on Cash Flow Statement (find it in Cash Flow stateme
2008 Cash Flow Statement Line 16; page 47 (find it in Cash Flow stateme
2008 Income Statement Line 20; page 45 (find it in Income Statement)
2008 Cash Flow Statement Line 27; page 47 (find it in Cash flows from Inv
(add them whether they are negative or positive numbers)
Note: Ten-Cap price does not take into account growth rates of the company. It only accounts for Owner Earnings in 2015
Company Valuation
(if we want to change this %, it will increase the hurdle rate or lower it)
increasing this hurdle rate, will lower the Estimated Value of the company
which increases the effective Margin of Safety
1 + Growth Rate
105%
105%
105%
105%
105%
105%
105%
105%
105%
105%
105%
28.0833333333
ESTIMATED VALUE OF COMPANY in 10 YEARS
2008 Balance Sheet Statement Line 12; page 46 Debt is slightly lesser than the previous year
Price per Share
Meaning Moat Mgmt
$0.77 DONE
$3.78 DONE 0 0 0
$1.37 DONE
$0.68 DONE Date Symbol Price
05/15/2019 SBUX 77.06
2009-2017
ROIC from
(ycharts)
ROIC %
Revenue from
(ycharts)
Revenue (in B)
Revenue %
Compounded
me Buy Price
FY 2018
3.21
63%
Source: MacroTrends.net
Starbucks PE Ratio Historical
Date
5/15/2019
3/31/2019
12/31/2018
9/30/2018
6/30/2018
3/31/2018
DO NOT CHANGE THIS 12/31/2017
9/30/2017
6/30/2017
3/31/2017
12/31/2016
9/30/2016
6/30/2016
3/31/2016
12/31/2015
9/30/2015
6/30/2015
3/31/2015
12/31/2014
9/30/2014
6/30/2014
3/31/2014
12/31/2013
9/30/2013
6/30/2013
3/31/2013
12/31/2012
9/30/2012
6/30/2012
3/31/2012
12/31/2011
9/30/2011
6/30/2011
3/31/2011
12/31/2010
9/30/2010
6/30/2010
3/31/2010
12/31/2009
9/30/2009
6/30/2009
3/31/2009
12/31/2008
9/30/2008
6/30/2008
3/31/2008
12/31/2007
9/30/2007
6/30/2007
3/31/2007
12/31/2006
Change
Change Sticker MOS PBT
%
0.38 0.50% 88.32 44.16 10
6 $0.17 36.37
4.8 $0.06 80
4.09 $0.12 34.06
6.42 $0.22 29.88
6.8 $0.32 21.59
7.56 $0.43 17.79
8.84 $0.45 19.87
11.32 $0.44 26.02
11.34 $0.41 27.99
13.55 $0.39 34.74
15.3 $0.38 40.81
28.083333333
Sep-04 Sep-05 Sep-06 Sep-07 Sep-08
Ticker Name
Return on
Invested Capital
5.10%
5.90%
8.60%
10.20%
12.20%
12.60%
19.70%
20.10%
20.60%
35.80% Very high ROIC
46.10%
EXPENSIVE ERRORS CHECKLIST
MOAT
1. Moat is not instrinsic
2. Moat is not durable
3. Moat is not being widened
4. Big Four Numbers are not Growing
5. Book value (plus dividends), in particular, is not growing
6. Owner Earnings and free cash flow are not predictable
7. Cheap foreign competition getting stronger but hasn't reached U.S. industry yet.
MANAGEMENT
1. ROE and ROIC are going down
2. CEO does not act like an owner
3. CEO puts self first
4. CEO selling too much stock
5. Company buying back stock well above value
6. CEO recently replaced
7. Debt more than two years free cash flow
8. Debt increasing
9. Loan to expire soon
10. Loan covenants close to being breached by company
PRICING
1. Can't confidently calculate Owner Earnings
2. Pay more than the Ten Cap price, or
3. Pay more than the Eight-Year Payback Time price, or
4. Pay more than the Margin of Safety price
5. Temporary issues making earnings and/or free cash growth/losses abnormal
6. Earnings-Per-Share growth engineered via buybacks
7. Future growth rate and future P/E estimates not realistic
8. There is no Event, and no price drop
9. Price dropped but not enough of an Event to go on sale
10. Event produces significant fear but may not resolve itself in one to three years
11. Event may permanently damage the business
12. Can't understand the Event -- too complex.