DOCUMENT RESUME

ED 468 581 EC 309 172

AUTHOR Bremer, Christine D.; Vaughn, Sharon; Clapper, Ann T.; Kim,
Ae-Hwa
TITLE Collaborative Strategic Reading (CSR): Improving Secondary
Students' Reading Comprehension Skills. Research to Practice
Brief: Improving Secondary Education and Transition Services
through Research.
INSTITUTION National Center on Secondary Education and Transition,
Minneapolis, MN.
SPONS AGENCY Special Education Programs (ED/OSERS), Washington, DC.
PUB DATE 2002-07-00
NOTE 9p.; Volume 1, Issue 2. For Volume 1, Issue 1 see ED 466 913.
CONTRACT H326J000005
AVAILABLE FROM For full text: http://www.ncset.org.
PUB TYPE Guides Non-Classroom (055) Reports Descriptive (141)
EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF01/PC01 Plus Postage.
DESCRIPTORS Classroom Techniques; *Cooperative Learning; *Reading
Comprehension; *Reading Difficulties; *Reading Improvement;
Reading Instruction; *Reading Programs; Reading Skills;
*Reading Strategies; Secondary Education
IDENTIFIERS *Strategic Reading

ABSTRACT
This brief introduces a research-based practice,
Collaborative Strategic Reading (CSR). This reading comprehension practice,
designed to improve secondary students' reading comprehension skills,
combines two instructional elements: modified reciprocal teaching and
cooperative learning or student pairing. In reciprocal teaching, teachers and
students take turns leading a dialogue concerning key features of text
through summarizing, questioning, clarifying, and predicting. Reciprocal
teaching was developed with the intention of aiding students having
difficulty with reading comprehension. CSR is implemented in two phases:
teaching the strategies and cooperative learning group activity. During the
first phase, students learn four strategies: preview, click and clunk, get
the gist, and wrap up. Preview is used before reading the entire text for the
lesson and wrap up is used after reading the entire text for the lesson. The
other two strategies, click and clunk and get the gist, are used multiple
times, after each paragraph, while reading the text. During the second phase,
students engage in peer-led cooperative learning groups. Teachers first set
the stage for engaging cooperative groups and then select materials for CSR.
Procedures during this phase include whole class introduction, cooperative
group activities during CSR strategies, and whole class wrap up strategies.
(Contains 17 references.) (CR)

Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made

from the original document.
 Research Iso Practice
Improving Secondary Education and Transition Services through Research July 2002 Vol. 1 Issue 2

Collaborative Strategic
Reading (CSR): Improving
Secondary Students' Reading
Comprehension Skills
National Center on By Christine D. Bremer, Sharon Vaughn, Ann T Clapper, and Ae-Hwa Kim
Secondary Education
and Transition
Creating Opportunities for Youth The Problem
With Disabilities to Achieve Reading comprehension is a critical skill for secondary students with disabilities,
Successful Futures
as it facilitates participation in mainstream content-area classes. Unfortunately,
A partnership of many secondary educators are not adequately equipped to provide reading
Institute on Community Integration,
instruction. This Brief introduces a research-based practice, Collaborative
University of Minnesota, Strategic Reading (CSR), developed by Janette K. Klingner and Sharon Vaughn
Minneapolis, Minnesota
(1996, 1998).
National Center for the Study
of Postsecondary Education
Supports (RRTC), University Overview of CSR
of Hawai'i at Manoa CSR is a reading comprehension practice that combines two instructional
TransCen, Inc., elements: (a) modified reciprocal teaching (Palincsar & Brown, 1984), and (b)
Rockville, Maryland
cooperative learning (Johnson & Johnson, 1987) or student pairing. In recipro-
PACER Center, cal teaching, teachers and students take turns leading a dialogue concerning key
Minneapolis, Minnesota
features of text through summarizing, questioning, clarifying, and predicting.
Institute for Educational
Leadership, Center for Workforce
Reciprocal teaching was developed with the intention of aiding students having
Development, Washington, DC difficulty with reading comprehension. Palincsar and Brown found that seventh
National Association of State graders with poor reading comprehension skills achieved sizable gains through
Directors of Special Education, use of the reciprocal teaching method. More recent studies using reciprocal
Alexandria, Virginia
teaching have found it to be effective with struggling middle school and high
U.S. Department of Education, school readers (Alfassi, 1998; Lysynchuk, Pressley, & Vye, 1990). Klingner and
Office of Special Education
Programs, Washington, DC Vaughn (1996) originally designed CSR by combining modified reciprocal
teaching with cooperative learning. Through a number of research trials, CSR
has been refined and currently consists of four comprehension strategies that
students apply before, during, and after reading in small cooperative groups.
Watch for a coming
Research to Practice Brief
These reading strategies are: (a) preview (before reading), (b) click and clunk
offering information (during reading), (c) get the gist (during reading), and (d) wrap up (after
'hnilt Strategic Instruction reading).
Model (SIM). U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Office of Educational Research and Improvement
EDU ATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION
CENTER (ERIC)
This document has been reproduced as
received from the person or organization
originating it.
Minor changes have been made to
improve reproduction quality.
1)
Points of view or opinions stated in this
document do not necessarily represent
official OERI position or policy.
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
2 National Center on Secondary Education and Transition Research to Practice Brief

Research on CSR amounts of time engaged in academic-related

The effects of CSR on reading comprehension for strategic discussion and assisted one another while
students with learning disabilities, including second- using CSR. CSR has also been implemented in
ary students with learning disabilities, have been conjunction with other research-based reading
examined in a series of intervention studies by strategies (writing process approach, classwide peer
Vaughn, Klingner, and their colleagues. Most tutoring, making words) for elementary students
intervention studies demonstrated that CSR was with learning disabilities (Klingner, Vaughn,
associated with improved reading comprehension for Hughes, Schumm, & Elbaum, 1998). In this study,
students with learning disabilities. The first study trained teachers implemented CSR with their
using CSR was conducted with 26 seventh- and students. The results also confirmed that use of CSR
eighth-graders with learning disabilities who used has resulted in improvement in reading comprehen-
English as a second language. In this study, students sion and vocabulary for elementary students with
learned to use modified reciprocal teaching methods learning disabilities.
in cooperative learning groups (i.e., brainstorm,
predict, clarify words and phrases, highlight the Implementation of CSR
main idea, summarize the main idea(s) and impor- CSR can be implemented in two phases: (a) teach-
tant detail, and ask and answer questions). CSR was ing the strategies, and (b) cooperative learning group
effective in improving reading comprehension for activity or student pairing. The implementation
most of students with learning disabilities (Klingner steps described below were developed through a
& Vaughn, 1996). series of research studies (Bryant et al., 2000;
CSR has also been combined with other ap- Klingner & Vaughn, 1998, 1999; Vaughn et al.,
proaches to address the range of skills needed for 2000; Vaughn, Klingner, & Bryant, 2001).
reading competence in middle school and high
school. In a study of 60 sixth-grade middle school Phase 1. Teaching the Strategies
students with varied reading levels in inclusive Students learn four strategies: preview, click and
classrooms, a multicomponent reading intervention clunk, get the gist, and wrap up. Preview is used
was used to address the range of reading needs before reading the entire text for the lesson, and
(Bryant et al., 2000). CSR was used in conjunction wrap up is used after reading the entire text for the
with two other research-based.strategies: Word lesson. The other two strategies, click and clunk and
Identification (Lenz, Schumaker, Deshler, & Beals, get the gist, are used multiple times while reading
1984), and Partner Reading (Mathes, Fuchs, Fuchs, the text, after each paragraph.
Henley, & Sanders, 1994). Results revealed that Preview. Preview is a strategy to activate students'
students with learning disabilities significantly prior knowledge, to facilitate their predictions about
improved their word identification and fluency, but what they will read, and to generate interest. Preview
not reading comprehension. consists of two activities: (a) brainstorming and (b)
The effectiveness of CSR with elementary stu- making predictions.
dents with learning disabilities has also been sup- A teacher introduces previewing to students by
ported. Klingner, Vaughn, and Schumm (1998) asking them to think about the previews they have
implemented CSR with fourth graders with a wide seen at the movies. The teacher prompts students
range of reading levels. Students in the CSR group to tell what they learn from previews by asking
significantly outperformed those in the control questions such as, "do you learn who is going to
group on comprehension. In a subsequent study, be in the movie?" or "do you learn in what historical
fifth-grade students were taught to apply CSR by period the movie will take place?" Then the teacher
trained classroom teachers during English as a asks them to skim information such as headings,
Second Language (ESL) science classes (Klingner & pictures, and words that are bolded or underlined
Vaughn, 2000). Students significantly increased to determine (a) what they know about the topic
their vocabulary from pre- to post-testing. Further- and (b) what they think they will learn by reading
more, students in CSR groups spent greater the text.

3
 Collaborative Strategic Reading (CSR): Improving Secondary Students' Reading Comprehension Skills 3

Click and Clunk. Click and clunk is Practitioner Perspectives

a strategy that teaches students to
monitor their understanding during Marty Hougen, Ph.D., is the supervisor of dyslexia services for the
reading, and to use fix-up strategies Austin Independent School District in Austin, TX. She agreed to be
when they realize their failure to under- interviewed on her experiences with CSR.
stand text. The teacher describes a click
as something that "you really get. You On getting started . . .
know it just clicks." After students We started with a team of sixth-grade teachers teaching English,
understand, the teacher explains a clunk: ESL, Special Education, Math, Social Studies, and Science. The
"A clunk is like when you run into a next year we trained the seventh-grade teachers so that students
brick wall. You just really don't under- would have the opportunity to use the same strategy again.
stand a word the author is using. That's a On the need for teacher support . . .
clunk." Then, the teacher reads a short We found that the teachers needed a great deal of support to
piece aloud and asks students to listen begin to use the strategy. We met with them weekly, at the
carefully for clunks. The teacher asks beginning, and then biweekly after that. We also modeled lessons
students to write down their clunks and in their classrooms and had problem-solving sessions with indi-
then teaches fix-up strategies to figure vidual teachers.
out the clunks. The teacher can use
"clunk cards" (see Materials for detailed On what works . . .
description) as reminders of fix-up Most of our content-area teachers have had very little training in
strategies. how to teach reading. So, they go to a workshop and get dozens
Get the gist. Get the gist is a strategy of prereading strategies, some during-reading strategies, and all
to help students identify main ideas these wonderful things to do after the students read. Then they
during reading. One way to identify the get back to their classrooms and they're so overwhelmed that they
main idea is to answer the following don't use any of the strategies or they use a different one every
questions: (a) "who or what is it about?" day and the students don't see any consistency. CSR gives teach-
and (b) "what is most important about ers just a couple of prereading strategies, a couple of during-
the who or what?" In addition, students reading strategies and a couple of after-reading strategies so that
are taught to limit their response to ten students use the same strategies every time they read. The stu-
words or less, so that their gist conveys dents use the same strategies over and over. They internalize the
the most important idea(s), but not strategies, generalize use of the strategies to other classes, and
unnecessary details. become more active, independent readers. That's what works.
Get the gist can be taught by focusing
on one paragraph at a time. While
On what administrators can do . . .
The principal has to actively support the teachers by seeing that
students read the paragraph, the teacher
they get the training and actually use the strategies. When I say
asks them to identify the most important
actively support, I mean publicly too at parent meetings,
person, place, or thing. Then the teacher
school board meetings, faculty meetings, and assemblies for
asks students to tell what is most impor-
students. Our administration kept saying: "This is what we're
tant about the person, place, or thing.
going to do and we're going to support you while you're learning
Finally, the teacher teaches students to
to do this."
put it all together in a sentence contain-
ing ten words or less. On what teachers say . . .
Wrap up. Wrap up is a strategy that At first one of our teachers said, "If these kids can't read by the
teaches students to generate questions time they're in seventh grade then forget it. I'm a science teacher
and to review important ideas in the text not a reading teacher." And now, after using CSR, he introduces
they have read. Wrap up consists of two himself as a reading teacher who also teaches science!
activities: (a) generating questions, and
(b) reviewing.

4
4 National Center on Secondary Education and Transition Research to Practice Brief

A teacher initially teaches students to wrap up by about 80% of the words correctly, (b) reading
telling students to pretend they are teachers and to materials having themes and supporting details,
think of questions they would ask on a test. The (c) reading materials consisting of several para-
teacher suggests the following question starters: who, graphs, and (d) reading materials containing
what, when, where, why, and how. The teacher also clues/pictures for predicting (Texas Center for
encourages students to generate some questions that Reading and Language Arts, 2000).
require an answer involving higher-lever thinking 2. Clunk cards. Each of the four clunk cards con-
skills, rather than literal recall. Finally, the teacher tains one fix-up strategy. Fix-up strategies
asks students to write down the most important included in the clunk cards are: (a) reread the
ideas from the day's reading assignment. sentence with the clunk and look for key ideas
to help you figure out the word think about
Phase 2. Cooperative Learning Group or what makes sense, (b) reread the sentences
Student Pairing before and after the clunk looking for clues, (c)
Once students have learned the four strategies look for a prefix or suffix in the word that might
(preview, click and clunk, get the gist, and wrap up) help, and (d) break the word apart and look for
and have developed proficiency applying them in smaller words that you know.
teacher-led activities, they are ready to apply CSR in
3. Cue cards. Cue cards outline the procedures to
their peer-led cooperative learning groups. Some
be followed in a cooperative learning group.
teachers find it easier to have students work in pairs,
They remind students of each step of CSR for
and that has also proven to be a successful practice.
each role. Each role comes with a corresponding
Procedures for using these strategies with groups are
cue card that explains the steps to be followed to
outlined below.
fulfill that role (see Figure 1 for a sample cue
Set the stage. First, the teacher assigns students to
card for a CSR leader).
groups. Each group should include about four
students of varying ability. Then, the teacher assigns 4. Learning log. CSR learning logs serve two roles:
roles to students. Roles should rotate on a regular (a) written documentation of learning, assuring
basis so that students can experience a variety of the individual accountability that facilitates
roles. Possible roles include the following: cooperative learning, and (b) study guides for
1. Leader Tells the group what to read next and students (see Figure 2 for a sample CSR
what strategy to use next. learning log).
2. Clunk Expert Uses clunk cards to remind the 5. Timer (optional). Timers that students set by
group of the steps to follow when trying to themselves can help groups to remain on task.
figure out the meaning of their clunk(s). 6. Score card (optional). The scorekeeper in a group
3. Gist Expert Guides the group toward getting the follows a cue card to find out when to award
gist and determines that the gist contains the points, and records these points on a score card.
most important idea(s) but no unnecessary Process. The basic steps to apply CSR in a
details. cooperative learning group are as follows:
4. Announcer. Calls on group members to read a Step 1: Whole class introduction. The teacher intro-
passage or share an idea. duces the topic, teaches key vocabulary, and
provides instructions.
Materials. The following materials may be
helpful as a teacher assists students to use CSR and Step 2: Cooperative group activity during preview,
cooperative learning techniques (Klingner, Vaughn, click and clunk, get the gist, and wrap up. Each
Dimino, Schumm, & Bryant, 2001). group member plays an assigned role and fills
1. Reading materials. When selecting reading out a CSR learning log during the activity.
materials for CSR, the following factors are Step 3: Whole class wrap up strategy. A teacher
recommended for consideration: (a) reading discusses the day's reading passage, reviews
materials at students' instructional level, which clunks, answers questions, or shares some
generally refers to students being able to decode review ideas.

5
 Collaborative Strategic Reading (CSR): Improving Secondary Students' Reading Comprehension Skills 5

Figure 1: CSR Leader's Cue Card

Before Reading During Reading After Reading

Preview Read Wrap up
Today' s topic is Who would like to read the Now let' s generate some
next section? questions to check if we really
Let' s brainstorm everything we understood what we read.
already know about the topic Click and Clunk Remember to start your
and write it on your learning Did everyone understand what questions with who, when,
logs. we read? If you did not, write what, where, why, or how.
your clunks in your learning Everyone, write your questions
Who would like to share their logs. in your learning logs.
best ideas?
[If someone has a clunk] Clunk Who would like to share their
Now let' s predict. Look at the Expert, please help us out. best question?
title, pictures, and headings and
think about what you think we Get the Gist In your learning logs, let' s write
will learn today. Write your It' s time to Get the Gist. Gist down as much as we can about
ideas in your learning logs. Expert, please help us out. what we learned today.

Who would like to share their Go back and repeat all of the Let' s go around the group and
best ideas? steps in this column over for each share something we
each section that is read. learned.

Compliments and
Suggestions
The Encourager has been
watching carefully and will now
tell us two things we did really
well as a group today.

Is there anything that would

help us do even better next
time?

Adapted from Texas Center for Reading and Language Arts. (2000). Professional development guide:
Enhancing reading comprehension for secondary students-part II. Austin, TX: Texas Center for Reading
and Language Arts.

BEST COPY AVAILABLE

6
6 National Center on Secondary Education and Transition Research to Practice Brief

Figure 2: CSR Learning Log

Name: Date:

Brainstorm: What do you already know about this Predict: What do you think you will learn by
topic? reading this passage?

Clunks: Please list your Clunks.

The Gist (main idea): Write the Gist of the section you read.

Make questions: Make questions about main ideas. Review: Write something important they learned.

Adapted from Texas Center for Reading and Language Arts. (2000). Professional development guide:
Enhancing reading comprehension for secondary students-part 11. Austin, TX: Texas Center for Reading
and Language Arts. For use in the classroom, this figure should be expanded to fill an entire page.

Role of the teacher. During the cooperative

group activity, the teacher's role is to circulate References
among the groups, clarifying clunks, modeling Alfassi, M. (1998). Reading for meaning: The
strategy usage, modeling cooperative learning efficacy of reciprocal teaching in fostering read-
techniques, redirecting students to remain on-task, ing comprehension in high school students in
and providing assistance. remedial reading classes. American Educational
Research Journal 35(2), 309-322.
Conclusion Bryant, D. P., Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S.,
Collaborative Strategic Reading is an approach that Ugel, N., Hamff, A., & Hougen, M. (2000).
works well in mixed-ability classrooms and helps Reading outcomes for students with and without
students improve their reading comprehension. CSR reading disabilities in general education middle-
can be implemented in a subject-area classroom, school content area classes. Learning Disability
such as science or social studies, to improve student Quarterly, 23(3), 24-38.
comprehension of expository text. It takes time to Johnson, D. W, & Johnson, R. T. (1987). Learning
teach the CSR strategies, but students benefit by together and alone (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs,
developing skills enabling them to better understand NJ: Prentice-Hall.
the material in their reading assignments. An addi- Klingner, J. K. & Vaughn, S. (1996). Reciprocal
tional benefit is the development of skills related to teaching of reading comprehension strategies for
working in groups. students with learning disabilities who use
 Collaborative Strategic Reading (CSR): Improving Secondary Students' Reading Comprehension Skills 7

English as a second language. The Elementary Instruction, 1(2), 117-175.

School Journal, 96(3), 275-293. Texas Center for Reading and Language Arts (2000).
Klingner, J. K. & Vaughn, S. (1998). Using Col- Professional development guide: Enhancing reading
laborative Strategic Reading. Teaching Exceptional comprehension for secondary students-part II
Children, 30(6), 32-37. Available: http:// Austin, TX: Texas Center for Reading and
www.ldonline.org/Id_indepth/ Language Arts.
teaching_techniques/collab_reading.html Vaughn, S., Chard, D., Bryant, D. P., Coleman, M.,
Klingner, J. K. & Vaughn, S. (1999). Promoting Tyler, B., Thompson, S., & Kouzekanani, K.
reading comprehension, content learning, and (2000). Fluency and comprehension interven-
English acquisition through Collaborative tions for third-grade students: Two paths to
Strategic Reading (CSR). The Reading Teacher, improved fluency. Remedial and Special Educa-
52(7), 738-747. tion, 21(6), 325-335.
Klingner, J. K., & Vaughn, S. (2000). The helping Vaughn, S., Klingner, J. K., & Bryant, D. P. (2001).
behaviors of fifth graders while using collabora- Collaborative strategic reading as a means to
tive strategic reading during ESL content classes. enhance peer-mediated instruction for reading
TESOL Quarterly, 34(1), 69-98. comprehension and content area learning.
Klingner, J. K., Vaughn, S., Dimino, J., Schumm, J. Remedial and Special Education, 22(2), 66-74.
S., & Bryant, D. (2001). From clunk to click:
Collaborative Strategic Reading. Longmont, CO: Resources
Sopris West.
Klingner, J. K., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M. T.,
Enhancing Reading Fluency and
Reading Comprehension for Secondary
Schumm, J. S., & Elbaum, B. (1998). Outcomes Students - Parts I & II
for students with and without learning disabili- http://www.texasreading. org/tcrla/publications/ second-
ties in inclusive classrooms, Learning Disabilities ary/secondary_fluency.htm
Research & Practice, 13(3), 153 -161. These CSR professional development manuals (in
Klingner J.K., Vaughn S., & Schumm, J.S. (1998). pdf format) explain CSR implementation in detail.
Collaborative strategic reading during social Part II addresses implementing CSR with students
studies in heterogeneous fourth-grade classrooms. in special education.
The Elementary School Journal, 99(1), 3-22.
Lenz, B. K., Schumaker, J. B., Deshler, D. D., &
From clunk to click: Collaborative
Strategic Reading
Beals, V. L. (1984). Learning strategies curricu-
Klingner, J. K, Vaughn, S., Dimino, J., Schumm, J.
lum: The word-identification strategy. Lawrence:
S., & Bryant, D. (2001). Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
University of Kansas.
This book includes lesson plans for the CSR strate-
Lysynchuk, L., Pressley, M. & Vye, N. (1990). gies, ideas for whole-class activities, and reproducible
Reciprocal teaching improves standardized materials. The final chapter focuses on using CSR
reading-comprehension performance in poor with secondary students.
comprehenders. The Elementary School Journal,
90(5), 469-484.
Mathes, PG., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Henley, A.
M., & Sanders, A. (1994). Increasing strategic
reading practice with Peabody classwide peer
tutoring. Learning Disabilities Research 6- Prac-
tice, 9, 44-48.
Palincsar, A.M., & Brown, A.L. (1984). Reciprocal BEST COPY AVAILABLE
teaching of comprehension-fostering and com-
prehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and
 -
N
0==> NCSET Web

http://vvww.ncsetorg
a National Resource Coordination Tool
National Center on Secondary
Education and Transition
Institute on Community Integration (UAP),
University of Minnesota, 6 Pattee Hall,
150 Pillsbury Dr. SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455

Tel: 612.624.2097; Fax: 612.624.9344;

Web: http://www.ncset.org;
Here's what you'll find E-mail: ncset@icimail.coled.umn.edu

This report was supported in whole or in part by the U.S.

> Topical Information Department of Education, Office of Special Education
Information on over 26 diverse topics in secondary education Programs, (Cooperative Agreement No. H326J000005).
and transition including an overview, answers to commonly asked The opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect
the policy or position of the U.S. Department of Education,
questions, research abstracts, emerging practices, and more! Office of Special Education Programs, and no official
O OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO endorsement by the Department should be inferred.
> E-News
The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator
NCSET's online newsletter loaded with information and links to and employer. This publication is available in alternate
publications, events, funding opportunities, Web sites, and other formats upon request. To request an alternate format or
useful national resources all searchable and at your fingertips! additional copies, contact NCSET at 612.624.2097.
O OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

> Publications
Full text of all NCSET publications available for quick and IDEAs
easy download! that WorI-
> Events U.S. Office of Special
Event registration, pre-event community circles, and online Education Programs
learning resources.
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 The College of Education
> And More! & Human Development
O 0 OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA

-011
1\1=> Non-profit Org.
(I
U.S. Postage

National Center on Secondary PAID

Education and Transition Mpls., MN
Institute on Community Integration (UAP) Permit No. 155
University of Minnesota
6 Pattee Hall, 150 Pillsbury Drive, SE
Minneapolis, MN 55455
 U.S. Department of Education
Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI)
Educational Renames Woman Calla
National Library of Education (NLE)
Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC)

NOTICE

Reproduction Basis

This document is covered by a signed "Reproduction Release (Blanket)"

form (on file within the ERIC system), encompassing all or classes of
documents from its source organization and, therefore, does not require a
"Specific Document" Release form.

This document is Federally-funded, or carries its own permission to

reproduce, or is otherwise in the public domain and, therefore, may be
reproduced by ERIC without a signed Reproduction Release form (either
"Specific Document" or "Blanket").

EFF-089 (1/2003)