Brexit and Student Accommodation
Brexit and Student Accommodation
Brexit and Student Accommodation
student
housing
A degree of uncertainty
May 2017
kpmg.com/uk
© 2017 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity.
Brexit and student housing 3
© 2017 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity.
4
Brexit and student housing
There are fears that a reclassification of EU nationals as A further increase in tuition fees for EU students to
‘international students’ (who made up 13.8% of total £14,500 – roughly the annual fee at top institutions for an
student numbers in 2014/15) would see their tuition fees rise ‘international student’ – could well result in student numbers
sharply. Higher fees are also being blamed for the drop in shrinking by a further 4.6% to 7.6%, we estimate.
English applicants.
And the competition may also become more appealing:
Worse, they may fall victim to tougher new net migration most European countries provide free access to higher
targets, effectively capping overseas student numbers. education for EU nationals. Nicola Dandridge, Chief
Home Secretary Amber Rudd told the Conservative Executive of Universities UK, told the Commons Education
Party conference in October that there had to be tougher Select Committee in January: “Our competitor countries,
regulations for foreign students. particularly in the EU, see this as a huge advantage for
them. They are redoubling their marketing efforts and see
“The current system treats every student and university
Brexit as posing a good opportunity for them to recruit
as equal,” she said. “We need to look at whether this one
internationally-mobile EU students.”
size fits all approach is right for the hundreds of different
universities, providing thousands of different courses across Will there be a flow of UK students returning from the EU
the country. This isn’t about pulling up the drawbridge. It’s to balance things out? Some 25,000 to 30,000 UK nationals
about making sure students that come here, come to study.” now study in EU universities, against 125,000 EU students
currently in the UK, according to Universities UK.
On the plus side, there’s the EU Erasmus Plus student
exchange scheme, launched in 1987. This allows students
to study in the EU free for a year, including living expenses.
Over 200,000 students have already benefited.
Secretary of State for Exiting the EU, David Davis, has
said the UK could continue to pay for access to particular
schemes – and Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson hinted that
Erasmus could be one of the few EU projects the UK may
support.
A question of money
Nevertheless, there is little guidance over how Brexit might
affect EU student fee structures. This could cement negative
sentiment on higher education in the UK.
At present, EU students are entitled to a reciprocal
agreement which allows them to pay identical fees to UK
students, including loans of up to £9,000 per year. (They pay
no fees at Scottish universities.)
EU students applying to study in the 2017/18 academic year
will still be eligible for student loans and grants for the full
duration of their courses – allowing some certainty over their
medium-term accommodation needs.
However, it is possible that as soon as the UK leaves the
EU – under whatever exit arrangements – these rights will
cease. Even reclassifying them as ‘international students’
would mean a 50% increase in fees – a clear deterrent for
students.
There is precedent. In 2012/13, UK tuition fees rose from
£3,000 to an average of £8,500 per year and EU student
numbers may have reduced by up 19.7% as a result, based
on actual applications against projected numbers and
historic rates of growth.
© 2017 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity.
Brexit and student housing 5
Home away from home The risk for real estate businesses is therefore a dramatic
reverse of the trend. In recent years, the rising number of
The switch from traditional university halls to privately built
EU students have been proportionately more attracted to
accommodation has been a boon for developers: demand
PBSA. Post-Brexit – and even before changes to migration
has risen steadily, both in numbers and the quality of living
and fee rules – their numbers, and therefore the need for
facilities. Any large drop in the number of overseas students
accommodation, are bound to decline.
will, however, disproportionately affect this sector.
Brexit is not all gloom, however. The depreciation of sterling
• Non-UK students are 65% more likely to live in PBSA than
makes UK living and fees more attractive and There remains
UK students.
the pull of a world-leading UK degree. Plus, there’s also
• In 2007/08, 2.9% of full-time, UK-domiciled students lived rising demand from an increasingly influential – and wealthy
in private PBSA, rising to 5.1% in 2013-14. – Asian and African middle class.
• The proportion living in university PBSA dropped from Those groups are not immune to the risk of the UK
18.9% to 17% over the same period. government cracking down on net migration. And Brexit
might still be sending the message that the UK is less
• The proportion of non-UK students living in private PBSA welcoming to foreigners. Nevertheless, they do still offer a
has grown from 4.3% to 10.8% over the same period. potential growth market for UK education – and the student
• University PBSA has dropped from 31% to 26.3%. accommodation that goes with it.
Feedback suggests that university PBSA remains the most
popular choice of accommodation for non-UK students.
But supply constraints have caused them to seek out other
forms of accommodation, particularly as they are obviously
unable to live at home during their studies.
Term time accommodation of full-time UK domiciled students Term time accommodation of full-time non-UK domiciled
2007-08 – 2013-14 students 2007-08 – 2013-14
100% 100%
14.4% 12.0% 11.8% 11.3% 9.9% 9.2% 2.9% (1.4%) 14.2% 12.7% 7.8% 1.5%
15.1% 18.4% 17.8% 15.8% 16.2% 15.9%
© 2017 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity.
6
Winners and losers London is also popular with EU students, who make up
10.3% of the full-time total. The numbers vary from 3% to
So where in the UK is the real estate sector most vulnerable
25% depending on the institutions, with arts universities
to a post-Brexit shift in student location choices?
accounting for the highest percentage.
Scottish cities are popular with young continentals because
There are 12 university cities where EU nationals make up
they don’t have to pay fee and are therefore particularly
more than 5% of full-time students. These cities – including
exposed. In Aberdeen, for example, 16.3% of full-time
Oxford (9.1%), Cambridge (9.2%), Coventry and Bath – are
students are EU nationals, while in Edinburgh, the
home to more than 50% of the UK’s EU student population.
proportion is 12.2%.
Note: The EU student proportion included in the table for All UK EU students includes both full and part
time students, other proportion values are based on full time students only.
Source: HESA
© 2017 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity.
Brexit and student housing 7
Oxford and Cambridge are likely outliers – their international Developers could also use Brexit as an opportunity to invest
reputation should enable them to turn EU student vacancies in accommodation in Ireland and other EU countries – or in
into UK or international places at the expense of other Tier 2 UK cities suffering from a limited supply of student
universities. Scottish universities may also be protected beds.
by their no-fee structure. London will be shielded to some
In this time of uncertainty, market analysis and investor
extent by its global appeal.
sentiment remain critical, especially given wider structural
Equally, cities with a low existing proportion of EU changes in cities, shifting work patterns, housing availability
students – Swansea, Plymouth and Liverpool – shouldn’t be and education policy.
significantly affected.
Developers need to cut through the Brexit noise to plan
Other cities – and their accommodation providers – aren’t their next steps. Risks are starting to crystallise. But there
so lucky. Six of the largest English university cities are are undoubtedly genuine new opportunities out there in
particularly exposed: Coventry, Canterbury, Southampton, the real estate sector as Europe realigns and the UK and its
Bath, Exeter and Manchester. businesses start to cast their sights further afield.
© 2017 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership, and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity.
Andy Pyle
Andy leads our Real Estate practice in the UK,
and is responsible for overseeing all of KPMG’s
services to Real Estate clients. Andy is a
Chartered Accountant, has been a partner for
eight years and is a Deal Advisory specialist.
E: andy.pyle@kpmg.co.uk
T: +44 (0)7968 987345
kpmg.com/uk
© 2017 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG
International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm third parties, nor does KPMG International have any
such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
The information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely
information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information
without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. CRT074230