10 1002@sici1096-988819970132@171@@aid-Jms4523 0 Co2-9 PDF
10 1002@sici1096-988819970132@171@@aid-Jms4523 0 Co2-9 PDF
10 1002@sici1096-988819970132@171@@aid-Jms4523 0 Co2-9 PDF
Jaeman Byun,1 Michael L. Gross,1* Mathai George,2 David M. Parees,3 Ann Z. Kamzelski,3
Dennis F. H. Swijter3” and Dale A. Willcox3
1 Department of Chemistry, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, 63130 (USA)
2 Midwest Center for Mass Spectrometry, Department of Chemistry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588-0304
(USA)
3 Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., Allentown, PA 18195 (USA)
Two fragmentations of (CH ) SiO-CR -X-CR -OSi(CH ) , where X is a rigid group such as a triple bond or an
33 2 2 33
aromatic ring, are losses of a methyl or R group (where R is H or alkyl). The metastable-ion dissociations of
[ M Ô R ] ‘ and [ M Ô CH ] ‘ ions include the rearrangement of a trimethylsilyl (TMS) cation and a
3
(CH ) SixO neutral species through an ion–neutral complex. On the basis of tandem mass spectrometry
32
(MS/MS), exact mass measurement and isotopic labeling experiments, it has been established that the two tri-
methylsilyloxy groups in the TMS ethers interact across a wide range of distances via an ion–neutral complex. The
migration of a TMS cation occurs when the group that is bound to carbon is expelled as a radical by an oxygen-
directed cleavage to give a trimethylsilylated oxonium ion. If, on the other hand, a methyl radical is lost from the
silicon atom, then (CH ) SixO migrates. The mobilities of the TMS cation and the neutral (CH ) SixO are
32 32
governed by the capability of the rigid group to delocalize charge.
J. Mass Spectrom. 32, 71È80 (1997)
No. of Figures : 14 No. of Tables : 2 No. of Refs : 44
KEYWORDS : diols ; TMS ethers ; group migration ; fragmentation mechanisms ; ionÈneutral complexes ; tandem mass spec-
trometry
NMR spectroscopy
the C-3 and C-6), 0.96 (t, 6H, 2 CH of the C-1 and C-8) from the CH group or by the loss of a methyl radical
3 2
and 1.63 (q, 4H, 2 CH of the C-2 and C-7). that is bound to the silicon atom are more abundant
2 than are the molecular radical cations.
For aliphatic TMS ethers, the [M [ R]` ion, which
Instrumentation and procedures is generated by the loss of a hydrogen, methyl or ethyl
radical from the carbon backbone, is barely observable.
A Kratos MS-50 tandem mass spectrometer was used The ion [M [ CH ]`, produced by the loss of a methyl
to acquire the tandem mass spectra.34 The Ðrst-stage 3
group from the silicon atom, however, is of higher
mass spectrometer was a high-resolution, double- abundance. For the hexyne TMS ether V, one cannot
focusing instrument of normal geometry ; the second determine the origin of the expelled methyl group
stage was an electrostatic analyzer. An ion accelerating without isotopic labeling experiments, which will be
voltage of 8 kV and an electron energy of 70 eV were described later.
used for these experiments. All samples were introduced
into the source through a room temperature liquid inlet.
For MS/MS experiments, precursor ions were selected [ M Ô H ] ‘ ions from aromatic TMS ethers
at a resolving power of 1500 with MS-1 and product-
ion mass spectra were obtained by scanning the electric The signiÐcant fragment ions produced from the
Ðeld of the second electrostatic analyzer (ESA). Helium [M [ H]` species and their relative abundances in the
was employed as a collision gas for activating ions for EI-induced metastable-ion mass spectra are sum-
collisionally activated decomposition (CAD), and its marized in Table 1. The three principal fragments are of
pressure was increased until the intensity of the selected m/z 147, 119 and 73. The formation of the ion of m/z
ion beam was reduced by 50%. For metastable-ion 119 from the [M [ H]` ion is the major metastable-ion
experiments, the same procedure was employed in decomposition process and may occur via an ionÈ
acquiring tandem mass spectra except that no collision neutral complex. Details of the fragmentation pathways
gas was used. In MS/MS/MS experiments, the ions pro- will be presented later. The relative abundances of the
duced in the source were activated in the Ðrst collision ion of m/z 73 vary depending on substitution positions
cell, which is located between the source and the Ðrst between the two trimethylsilyloxy groups. A possible
ESA. A speciÐc fragment ion was chosen by adjusting explanation of this dependence is that major fragments
the Ðrst ESA and the magnetic sector to the appropriate from the ion of I and II are produced via an ionÈneutral
values, and the ion of interest was transmitted at a complex as an intermediate. Substitution at the ortho
resolving power that was sufficient to separate ions that position (III), however, allows the two TMS groups to
are one mass unit apart to the second collision cell ; the interact directly en route to producing fragments.
CAD spectrum was then obtained by scanning the The decompositions of metastable [M [ H]` ions
second ESA. A more detailed explanation of the tandem from 1,4-bis(trimethylsilyloxymethyl)benzene, I, produce
mass spectrometric experimental procedures was a number of fragment ions (see Fig. 1). The ion of m/z
published previously.35 251 is generated by the loss of CH O. The ions of m/z
2
207 and 193 are produced by a hydride and methide
group abstraction by a TMS cation, leading to the
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION losses of HSi(CH ) and Si(CH ) , respectively. A TMS
3 3 by simple 3 4cleavage of the SiwC
cation is also formed
bond. The dissociation of metastable [M [ H]` ions
The molecular ions of aliphatic and aromatic com- from the meta, II and ortho, III, isomers also produces
pounds I [ VI are of low abundance or are not detect- an ion of m/z 119 as the major fragment. The formation
able. For the aromatic TMS ethers, I [ III, the ions of the fragment ions of m/z 119 and 147, which occur in
that are generated by the loss of a hydrogen radical the mass spectra of the aromatic ethers, I, II and III,
Scheme 1.
Scheme 2.
Scheme 3.
of a tropylium ion, 9, which decomposes to ions of m/z
221, 147 and 133. The ion of m/z 147, 10, which is a
di†erent species that is produced directly from the ion A fragmentation mechanism for the formation of the
ion of m/z 147, 16, from the [M [ CH ]` ion (m/z 267)
of m/z 267, contains only one silicon atom (see Scheme
of the para isomer (see Scheme 3) begins 3 with stretching
2).
the bond between neutral (CH ) SixO and the incipi-
ent cation. Resonance charge3 2delocalization in the
cation allows the (CH ) SixO species to interact at
various positions of the3 aromatic
2
ring, opening a reac-
tion channel for the migration of (CH ) SixO and for-
32
mation of the m/z 147 ion. The rearrangement of
(CH ) SixO across the rigid group may occur via an
32
ionÈneutral complex and ultimately a Ðve-membered
ring intermediate is formed. For the case of the meta
isomer, a six-membered ring intermediate would be
formed to accommodate the di†erent charge delocal-
ization of the benzene ring.
The principal fragment ions generated from the [M
[ CH ]` ions from the three isomers and their relative
3
abundances in the metastable-ion spectra are sum-
marized in Table 1. The formation of the ion of m/z 119
from the [M [ CH ]` ion is the most favorable meta-
3 process for II and III, whereas the
stable decomposition
formation of this ion is less favored for I. This m/z 119
ion has a di†erent elemental composition from an iso-
baric fragment that is produced from the [M [ H]`
ion. The formation of the ion of m/z 147 is less favorable
than formation of the m/z 237 of I (Fig. 3(A)) or of the
ion of m/z 119 of II and III isomers (Fig. 3(B) and (C)).
The relative abundances of fragment ions of m/z 119
and 147 indicate that the ion of m/z 147 from I is more
favored than the ion of m/z 119, whereas the ion of m/z
147 from II or III is less favored. The proposed mecha-
nism for decomposition of I (Scheme 3) shows that
Figure 4. Metastable-ion (A) and CAD (B) mass spectra of the CwO and SiwO bond cleavages followed by CwO
ion of m /z 237 for 1,4-bis (trimethylsilyloxymethyl)benzene. and SiwO bond formations are required to generate the
FRAGMENTATION OF TMS ETHERS OF DIOLS 77
m/z 147 ion. The production of the ion of m/z 119 also
requires CwO and SiwC bond cleavages, CwC and
SiwO bond formations, as well as SiwO bond break-
ing.
The CAD mass spectrum for the ortho isomer was
examined to determine whether the two tri-
methylsilyloxy groups interact with each other to
produce the ions of m/z 119 and 147. The metastable-ion
[Fig. 3(C)] and the CAD (Fig. 5) mass spectra show
that the reactions to form these two ions are competi-
tive. The generation of ion of m/z 147 by an SiwO bond
cleavage in the Ðve-membered ring intermediate, 19 in
Scheme 4, is a kinetically favored simple cleavage
process. Direct interaction of the two trimethylsilyloxy
groups, which is not possible for the meta and para
isomers, allows transfer of a trimethylsilyloxy group to
an oxygen of the neighboring TMS group. An alterna-
tive explanation is that this isomer also fragments via
an ionÈneutral complex ; this explanation is consistent
with the similar fragmentation chemistry that occurs for
the three isomers.
The metastable-ion mass spectra of [M [ CH ]` ion
3 ion is
from isomeric TMS ethers shows that the m/z 119
Aliphatic ethers
process, indicating that this predominant ion is formed stand the fragmentation pathways of the di†erent [M
by a low-energy reaction. The m/z 147 ion is also pro- [ CH ]` ions, the metastable-ion mass spectra of the
duced readily in the ion source. Exact mass measure- 3
d -labeled analog was examined [Fig. 8(B) and (C)].
18
ment for the source-produced m/z 147 ion showed that The fragments from the [M [ CH ]` ion generated by
its formula is C H Si O. The relative abundances of A, the loss of methyl radical bound 3to the carbon atom
A ] 1 and A ]52 15 2 147, 148 149, respectively, are
at m/z between the triple bond and oxygen are of m/z 190 and
also consistent with the formula. The structure of the 162 [see Fig. 8(B)]. The ion of m/z 190, [M [ CH
m/z 147 ion was conÐrmed by its CAD spectrum, which [ (CD ) SiOH], is formed by the major metastable3
is nearly identical with that of the [M [ CH ]` frag- 33
decomposition. The ion of m/z 147 now shifts to m/z
ment of hexamethyldisiloxane (see Fig. 7). Upon 3 col- 162.
lisional activation, the two ions of m/z 147, which have
two di†erent sources, produce abundant common frag-
ments at m/z 131, 117, and 73.
The abundances of [M [ R]` ions that are formed in
the ion source from aliphatic TMS ethers are greater for
losses of the large alkyl than the small alkyl radicals.
The [M [ H]` ion from 1,4-bis(trimethylsilyloxy)-but-
2-yne is of low abundance and decomposes to produce
the ions of m/z 201, 147 and 73. The metastable-ion
decompositions of the ions formed by the losses of
either methyl from the molecular ion of V or ethyl from
the molecular ion of VI produce the m/z 147 ion and the
[M [ R [ 90]` ion. The neutral of mass 90 is
(CH ) SiwOH, which may be expelled from the
3 3R]` ion by means of a charge-remote process.
[M [
The formation of this ion is a dominant metastable-ion
decomposition of the [M [ R]`.
The [M [ CH ]` ion from 2,5-dimethyl-2,5-bis(tri-
3
methylsilyloxy)-hex-3-yne dissociates by a metastable-
ion process to produce major fragment ions of m/z 197
and 181 in addition to that of 147 [see Fig. 8(A)]. The
ion of m/z 197 is produced by the migration across the
triple bond of the trimethylsilyl ion, which then
abstracts a hydride from a methyl group linked to the
carbon. The ion of m/z 181 from the two di†erent [M
[ CH ]` precursors is formed by the loss of
(CH ) 3SiwOH, possibly by means of a charge-remote
33
fragmentation. Figure 7. CAD spectra of (A) m /z 147 ion produced from hexa-
There are two possible sites in the hexyne compound methyldisiloxane and (B) m /z 147 ion generated in the source
(V) for the elimination of the methyl radical. To under- from 2,5-dimethyl-2,5-bis (trimethylsilyloxy)hex-3-yne.
FRAGMENTATION OF TMS ETHERS OF DIOLS 79
and the Si(CH )` ion migrates to the trimethylsilyloxy For the aromatic compounds, the metastable-ion
33 spectra of the [M [ H]` ion strongly support a TMS
group through either an ionÈneutral or p complex
(Scheme 6). If the latter were involved, positive charge cation migration by means of an intermediate ionÈ
moves on to the carbon skeleton to give a vinyl carbo- neutral complex. Futhermore, spectra of metastable [M
cation, a p complex that is less favored than that in an [ CH ]` ions show that the (CH ) SixO group
3 32
aromatic system. In the n complex, however, the posi- migrates, possibly through an ionÈneutral complex, en
tive charge remains principally on silicon, which should route to fragment ions of m/z 119 and 147.
be even more favored for these systems than those with For aliphatic TMS ethers, the ions generated by the
aromatic systems. The Ðnal product is then favored by loss of hydrogen, methyl and ethyl radicals from the
transfer of a methyl group to one of the carbons of the carbon backbones of various butyne, hexyne and octyne
triple bond, 29. This transfer should be facile because TMS diethers, respectively, also undergo the TMS
the siliconÈmethyl carbon bond is unusually long and cation rearrangement whereas the [M [ CH ]` ion
3
weak. that is produced by the loss of a methyl group linked to
the silicon atom undergoes (CH ) SixO migration.
32
These migration/rearrangements are likely to occur via
CONCLUSION ionÈneutral complexes.
REFERENCES
1. A. G. Sharkey, R. A. Friedel, Jr, and S. H. Langer, Anal . Chem . 21. W. J. Richter and J. A. McCloskey, Chem . Commun . 1158
29, 770 (1957). (1968).
2. H. Budzikiewicz,. C. Djerassi and D. H. Williams, Mass Spec- 22. R. D. Bowen and D. H. Williams, J . Am . Chem . Soc . 100,
trometry of Organic Compounds , pp. 471–476. Holden-Day, 7454 (1978).
San Francisco (1967). 23. R. D. Bowen, B. J. Stapleton and D. H. Williams, J . Chem .
3. J. A. McCloskey, R. N Stillwell and A. M. Lawson, Anal . Soc ., Chem . Commun . 25 (1978).
Chem . 40, 233 (1968). 24. T. H. Morton, Tetrahedron 38, 3195 (1982).
4. J. Diekman, J. B. Thomson and C. J. Djerassi, J . Org . Chem . 25. D. J. McAdoo, Mass Spectrom . Rev . 7, 363 (1988).
33, 2271 (1968). 26. P. Longevialle, Mass Spectrom . Rev . 11, 157 (1992).
5. M. Annan, P. W. LeQuesne and P. Vouros, J . Am . Soc . Mass 27. G. H. Draffan, R. N. Stillwell and J. A. McCloskey, Org . Mass
Spectrom . 4, 327 (1993). Spectrom . 1, 669 (1968).
6. G. Peterson, Org . Mass Spectrom . 6. 565 (1972). 28. G. Petersson, Org . Mass Spectrom . 6, 577 (1972).
7. W. P. Weber, R. A. Felix and A. K. Willard, J . Am . Chem . Soc . 29. P. Longevialle, Spectrosc . Int . J . 5, 43 (1987).
92 : 5, 1420 (1970). 30. L. Pauling, Science 263, 983 (1994).
8. S. Sloan, D. J. Harvey and P. Vouros, Org . Mass Spectrom . 5, 31. G. A. Olah, G. Rasul, X. Li, H. A. Buchholz and G. K. S.
789 (1971). Prakash, Science 263, 983 (1994).
9. C. J. W. Brooks, D. J. Harvey, B. S. Middledich and P. 32. J. B. Lambert and S, Zhang, Science 263, 984 (1994).
Vouros, Org . Mass Spectrom . 7, 925 (1973). 33. C. A. Reed and Z. Xie, Science 263, 985 (1994).
10. I. Bjo rkhen, J. Gustafsson and L. Sjo vall, Org . Mass Spectrom . 34. M. L. Gross, E. K. Chess, P. A. Lyon, F. W. Crow and H. Tudge
7, 277 (1973). Int . J . Mass Spectrom . Ion Phys . 42, 243 (1982).
11. C. J. W. Brooks, D. J. Harvey and B. S. Middleditch, J . Org . 35. D. J. Burinsky, R. C. Cooks, E. K. Chess and M. L. Gross, Anal .
Chem . 37, 3365 (1972). Chem . 54, 295 (1982).
12. T. J. Odiorne, D. J. Harvey and P. Vouros, J . Phys . Chem . 76, 36. U. Filges and H.-F. Gru tzmacher, Org . Mass Spectrom . 21,
3217 (1972). 673 (1986).
13. M. R. Ellenburger, M. L. Henderwerk, D. A. Well, W. E. 37. H.-F Gru tzmacher and U. Zalfen, Org . Mass Spectrom . 25,
Forneth and D. A. Dixon, Anal . Chem . 54, 1309 (1982). 323 (1990).
14. R. N. Still, D. I. Carroll, J. G. Nowlin and E. C. Horning, Anal . 38. S. Fornarini, J . Org . Chem . 53, 1314 (1988).
Chem . 55, 1313 (1983). 39. F. Cacace, E. Crestoni, S. Fornarini and R. Garbrielli, Int . J .
15. I. A. Blair and J. H. Bowie, Aust . J . Chem . 32, 1389 (1979). Mass Spectrom . Ion Processes 84, 17 (1988).
16. D. Clemens and B. Munson, Org . Mass Spectrom . 20, 368 40. X. Li and J. A. Stone, Int . J . Mass Spectrom . Ion Processes
(1985). 87, 17 (1990).
17. R. Orlando, F. Strobel, D. P. Ridge and B. Munson, Org . Mass 41. A. C. M. Wojtyniak and J. A. Stone, Int . J . Mass Spectrom .
Spectrom . 22, 597 (1987). Ion Processes 74, 59 (1986).
18. R. Orlando, D. P. Ridge and B. Munson, Org . Mass Spectrom . 42. J. B. Lambert, S. Zhang, C. L. Stern and J. C. Huffman,
23, 527 (1988). Science 260, 1917 (1993).
19. C. G. Pitt, M. M. Bursey, D. A. Chatfield and R. S. Greenberg, 43. P. v. R. Schleyer, P. Buzek, T. Muller, Y. Apeloig and H. U.
J . Organomet . Chem . 9, 269 (1975). Siehl, Angew . Chem . 105, 1558 (1993).
20. S. Gaskell, A. G. Smith and C. J. W. Brooks, Biomed . Environ . 44. C. A. Reed, Z. Xie, R. Bau and R. Benesi, Science 262, 402
Mass Spectrom . 2, 148 (1975). (1993).