CHEVALEYRE Aurelie Nothanger Abbey
CHEVALEYRE Aurelie Nothanger Abbey
CHEVALEYRE Aurelie Nothanger Abbey
In this dissertation I set out to explore the Gothic Novel from a new satirical point of
view and, more precisely, when it is turned into a parody. To achieve this goal, I have focused
In order to understand the parody, we have to look at the genre we are dealing with:
the Gothic novel. There is not one accurate definition of the Gothic novel since its purposes
are different according to the various authors. Contrary to what the modern reader may think,
the Gothic novel is not intended to terrorize the reader or at least it is not its main purpose. If
the reader believes so, it is essentially because the genre is usually associated with
supernatural elements which blur its genuine intentions. This quotation describes what any
reader might expect to find in a Gothic novel: “one of the powerful images conjured up by the
words 'Gothic novel' is that of a shadowy form rising from a mysterious place: Frankenstein's
monster rising from the laboratory table, Dracula creeping from his coffin, or more generally,
the slow opening of a crypt to reveal a dark and obscure figure.”1 The Gothic novel is
constantly misinterpreted by the modern reader who forgets the essential aim of this genre.
There are similarities which cannot be ignored and which contribute to this misunderstanding.
A great number of scholars and professors have identified and elaborated a list of generalities
related to the genre. One can recognize a Gothic novel thanks to these characteristics2 but it
takes more time to understand the underlying meaning: the very “essence” of the Gothic
novel. First Gothic novels were produced in the mid-eighteenth century. The Castle of
6
Otranto is considered to be the first one3. The eighteenth century is characterized by
numerous changes; The enlightenment and the scientific discoveries it produced transformed
the visions human beings used to have of themselves and of the external world. Philosophers
agreed on the issue that men were endowed with reason. The Gothic Novel is born in a world
which praised rationality and morality4. Those novels have similarities in their plots, narrative
techniques and characters, but they often differ as far as literary intentions are concerned. The
real purpose of the Gothic novel varies from an author to another but they do have a common
goal which is to make the reader aware of the superficiality and the darkness of his own
world. In her novels, Ann Radcliffe challenged the eighteenth century values to further
establish their legitimacy. Her novels condemn irrationality and dismiss vicious conducts and
behaviours. Kilgour suggests that Ann Radcliffe's Gothic stories tend to represent the world in
a manichean way5. She differentiated good from evil and that way, Radcliffe imposed herself
as a moralizing force.
What I will analyse is the way Jane Austen mocks Radcliffean Gothic literature by
Jane Austen was born in a family of seven children on 16 December 1775 in the
village of Steventon in Hampshire. Her parents ran an all boys' school. She was very close to
her sister Cassandra and wrote her numerous letters, thanks to which we now have an
overview of the customs of the time and her opinions about them. In 1797, she completed
Pride and Prejudice but did not manage to publish it, she started Sense and Sensibility and
Northanger Abbey (at the time, entitled Susan). The family moved to Bath in 1801 after Jane's
7
father retired, then she moved to Southampton where she stayed for three years. She moved
again to Hampshire where she completed her major novels and published the majority of
them. Pride and Prejudice was published in 1813, Mansfield Park in 1814 and Emma in 1815.
Although Northanger Abbey was the first chronologically to be written, it was published
posthumously in 1818 by her brother Henry and is well known as the parody of the Mysteries
of Udolpho.
In Northanger Abbey we find many known features of what characterizes her style: her
satirical tone, her mastery of language and her wit. She is recognized by many others as an
efficient observer of human nature and even considered as an Augustan by some. 6 She is often
referred to as a satirist, although the genres of her novels are diverse. Her great achievement is
that contrary to previous satirists like Pope or Swift, her goals are perfectly reachable and
achievable. She does not describe society according to a moral standard as they used to do.
On the contrary, she claims that virtue is at hand, ideals are achievable. Consequently, her
novels are rather didactic. They show the reader what is superficial in people's attitude and
She wrote at a period when literature was starting to change. Scientific discoveries,
revolutions in France and England, and the renewal of philosophical theories established that
men were capable of reason. The Novel was a new genre. Contrary to the epic or the drama,
the Novel places the hero at the heart of its reflections. For the first time, we have access to
Parody is the device Jane Austen used in the accomplishment of her satire. And such is
6 Marylin Butler, Jane Austen and The War of Ideas, p. 1
8
our definition of the satire: “A literary attack through ridicule, irony and parody, in verse or
prose, and intended to arouse amused contempt for its target.”7 Sutherland defines the satire
in his English Satire as the depiction of “the follies and imperfections and faults of men and
women”8 . He says that the main difference between a comedy writer and a satirist lies in the
fact that the comedy writer's motive is not to give his personal opinion or judgement about the
story he tells. On the contrary, the concern of the satirist is the morality of the object which is
described, thus his novel is likely to be both partial and tendentious. He does not tell the story
for itself but to make the reader aware of his judgement. “For him the human shortcomings
are not matters for pure contemplation; they must be exposed, held up to derision or made to
something or someone not only to divert people but to make them aware of the author's
judgement. The satirist wants the reader to realize that something is wrong in the way society
acts and it is his first concern when he writes his satire. He wants to bring to light the
shortcomings of society. I suggested here the definition of the type of satire I am going to deal
with, taking into account the elements James Sutherland provides us with: satire is the critical
depiction of society or of any object of society made by an artist whose aim is to enlighten the
reader. In our case, Northanger Abbey is a satire in which Jane Austen portrays her society
and questions its conventions and values. She mocks eighteenth century literature and more
We will also study Northanger Abbey's parodic aspects: “An amusing or mocking
imitation of the style of a writer or speaker, usually requiring a basic parallelism of form and
style and sudden unexpected twists. Parody often emphasizes and exaggerates typical features
9
of the original text or performance in order to make a point and, whether friendly or hostile,
exploits any possible weakness.”10. Jane Austen imitates the style of Ann Radcliffe, by
creating similar characters, adopting the same tone in a plot which resembles the original. The
popularity of Northanger Abbey is in fact mainly due to the success of its parody. Austen
managed to incorporate humour in the Gothic Novel, using satirical irony abundantly and
transforming a virtuous and talented heroine into a mediocre and plain girl. Indeed, we will
see in this dissertation that Catherine Morland is an anti-heroine whose story is a good pretext
to mock Ann Radcliffe's heroine. Austen kills two birds with one stone as the protagonist also
This dissertation will therefore be centred on the idea that Jane Austen wrote her
parody in order to satirize the Gothic novel and introduce humour in the genre. To some
degree, she also intended to satirize the Novel, considered at the time as very fashionable but
The form of the novel will be first analysed as it is mainly through language and style that a
novel by Jane Austen has to be studied. The way narration works, the way the heroine is
depicted and the various genres of the novel help us to understand how the novel is
constructed. Northanger Abbey is indeed multi-faceted and its originality is part of what
makes Austen's novel humorous. I will also study the satire, through the study of genders and
genres, the importance given to literature and the Gothic affiliation of some characters.
Finally, I will examine the parody in a stricter way, linking Northanger Abbey to its model,
10
Part 1
-
Formal Mystery
11
Chapter 1 – The Art of Narration
Very often Northanger Abbey is studied as a parody and its other aspects are rather
neglected. It was long relegated at the end of the list of Jane Austen's best works:
“Northanger Abbey is in some respects the Cinderella among Jane Austen's novels”11. It is
true to say that Northanger Abbey is not the first novel to be mentioned when talking about
Jane Austen. As far as I am concerned, I had never heard about the novel until I became
interested in the Gothic genre. What I am willing to show is that this book does not deserve
this treatment, for it is on many aspects a brilliant novel. It is not possible to accurately say
what Jane Austen's first intention was when she wrote the book. This is why my first analysis
In Northanger Abbey, the narration is quite uncommon. Generally, when the reader is
confronted to a novel, he does not really expect the narrator to talk to him or confide in him.
When we are dealing with confessions or with a diary, the narrator may talk to his reader
directly, but it is not likely to happen in a novel. Jane Austen breaks the rules and makes her
narrator intervene in the diegesis more often than not. The narrator dispels the illusion of the
novel by intervening several times to comment, explain details and give clues as to the
ending. At first, we do not really know whether the narrator is a character of the story or not.
The narrator addresses the reader quite naturally: “it may be stated, for the reader's more
certain information lest the following pages should otherwise fail of giving any idea of what
her character is meant to be; that her heat was affectionate […] and her mind about as
ignorant and uninformed as the female mind at seventeen usually is”12. The narrator here
mentions the reader as if it were quite natural to do so. The reader can infer that he is dealing
12
with an extradiegetic narrator, as he or she does not intervene or take part in the story as a
character. Yet, no information is given about this mysterious narrator who keeps telling his
opinion and giving advice to the reader. Whoever it is, he is nevertheless omnipresent in the
progression of the story. So we have here a mysterious narrator, who writes the story of
someone he does not seem to be related to. The effect it produces is the impression that there
is no barrier between the author and the narrator. They are one and the same person. I also
tend to believe that the author is a true Gothic storyteller. What I mean by true is an author
who does not want to mock the genre but, on the contrary, a narrator willing to tell a Gothic
story. It is as if Jane Austen were pretending to be another writer, asking us to trust her. She is
creating a close relationship between the narrator and the reader to make her narrator
Narration is all the more uncommon as some words which would normally not be
“allowed” in the diegesis are here said very naturally. For instance, the word “heroine” is
constantly employed, like in these two quotations: “But when a young lady is to be an
heroine, the perverseness of forty, surrounding families cannot prevent her. Something must
and will happen to throw a hero in her way”13; “here fortune was more favourable to our
heroine”14. A reader would not expect the narrator to tell him who the hero is and why he is a
hero. It is part of the literary contract linking the author and the reader. The reader has to
guess who the hero is on his own. I suppose it to be very rare that one would find the word
“hero” or “heroin” in a novel because it is not supposed to be that explicit. This is a device
Austen uses to create a distance between the reader and her heroine 15. She does not want the
reader to identify to Catherine Morland. On the contrary, she wants him to laugh at her and
13
feel superior to her. By telling “this person is my heroine” the irony is strong. She implies that
without this piece of information no one would believe Catherine is the heroine because the
Moreover, the evolution in the narration is very transparent. The narrator always
intervenes between each twists and turns of the plot to make the reader aware that something
new is happening. This device is as unusual in a novel as the previous elements we have just
seen. The frontiers between events are usually blurred by subtle transitions. Usually, the
narrator of the novel tells his story and the reader will notice where the action starts and where
it ends thanks to the clues given by the narrator. But it is implicitly made, through the use of
words, breaks in the rhythm and other devices. Sometimes a close analysis is required to
really see how the story is divided. Here there is no transition, the narrator says that
something will happen, and that this event needs our focus. For instance, as Catherine is about
to meet Henry Tilney, the narrator tells us: “and now was the time for an heroine”16, and later:
“every young lady may feel for my heroine in this critical moment”17. It is as if the narrator felt
the need to guide the reader in his reading. This device is aimed at fooling the reader. Because
the narrator announces that something is to happen, the reader expects something great but he
soon realizes that it is not that important. This is what happens after reading: “now was the
time for an heroine”. Catherine goes to her first ball, she is nicely dressed, we expect a man to
talk to her or compliment her, but all that happens is: “Not one, however, started with
rapturous wonder on beholding her, no whisper of eager inquiry ran round the room, nor was
she once called a divinity by anybody”. The expected event is missing from the page, it is as if
the narrator was playing with narration and with the reader. Another instance is the use of
14
negatives forms which emphasizes the fact that “nothing” happens. As a consequence, the
reader is toyed with. By the creation of these false announcements, the narration or meta-
narration announces a new prospect to him: “you're reading a Gothic novel, trust me”.
Therefore Austen's narration reinforces the character's naiveté and her blatant disabilities as a
heroine.
The heroine is a mystery, just like the narration and the genre of this novel are
mysteries. The narrator keeps repeating Catherine is a heroine, but she is what we can call an
disappointed. She believes herself to be educated and sensible because she reads books and
yet she is the one who is fooled by everybody. She is supposed to look like Emily St Aubert
from The Mysteries of Udolpho but they clearly have nothing in common. Emily St Aubert is
endowed with special gifts, for instance, poetry writing and drawing, whereas Catherine is not
able to draw anything and certainly cannot write. The irony of being called a heroine is that
she believes herself to be one. Because she reads Gothic novels, Catherine is transported in an
imaginary world where she is a heroine as well. But there is nothing heroic about her story:
she leaves her parents, visits Bath, visits Northanger Abbey, goes back to her parents' and gets
married. The narrator has a definition of “heroin” which is rather odd as it does not fit usual
standards. The traditional hero is someone who has a special gift to accomplish heroic
purposes: ingenuity, courage, brilliance. For the narrator, the hero is someone who has been
educated through books: “But from fifteen to seventeen she was in training for an heroine; she
read all such works as heroines must read to supply their memories with those quotations
15
which are so serviceable and so soothing in the vicissitudes of their eventful lives.”18 Such a
heroine is also supposed to have a special ability for the arts: “Her greatest deficiency was in
the pencil – she had no notion of drawing – not enough even to attempt a sketch of her lover's
profile, that she might be detected in the design. There she fell miserably short of the true
heroic height”. The definition given by the narrator is, of course, ironic - a definition Emily St
Aubert is the illustration of. The narrator needs to explain why Catherine is a “heroine” so he
justifies his claim by saying that although Catherine does not excel at drawing, she reads
enough books to be a literary heroine. Jane Austen is mocking two elements in just a few
lines: she mocks the heroine of The Mysteries of Udolpho and mocks the link between
heroism and literary education. Catherine herself believes the definition given by the narrator
since she is convinced that she reads enough books to be able to have the main role in one.
She thinks she knows what to expect and how to react in similar real situations she reads in
novels. For instance, the reader has access to Catherine's mind when she wants to explore the
The erection of the monument itself could not in the smallest degree affect her doubts
of Mrs Tilney's actual decease. Were she even to descend into the family vault where
her ashes were supposed to slumber […] Catherine had read too much not to be
perfectly aware of the ease with which a waxen figure might be introduced, and a
supposititious funeral carried on.19
Catherine expects to find horrid things in these apartments because it is precisely the kind of
details she notices in her novels.
The theme of the heroine is highly problematic in this novel because we cannot know
whether Catherine is an actual heroine or not. She is not endowed with traditional attributes.
16
She is an anti-heroine because she succeeds in spite of her disabilities and her shortcomings.
She is the main protagonist of the story and the story revolves around her. Moreover, even
though the appearances seem to be against her, she does accomplish heroic acts. Throughout
the novel, Catherine avoids traps: she does not become superficial like Mrs Allen, she defeats
the villains embodied by the Thorpes and the Tilneys and eventually gets married with the
man she loves. Marylin Butler argues that Northanger Abbey must be considered as a novel
first, before being read as a parody20. The story of Catherine leaving her native village and her
parents to go to Bath, her progression towards reason and awakening constitute a fictional
story on its own, which can exist beyond the humourous aspects: she “may not be a 'heroine'
in the idealized mode of sentimental fiction, but she is a very good heroine at the level which
matters”21.
What is implicit is that Catherine is supposed to represent the typical lady of the
eighteenth century. Jane Austen mocks the idea according to which young ladies have to read
Gothic novels for their education. She makes a clear criticism of Mrs Radcliffe's novels and
the effects it produces on girls at that time: “Charming as were all Mrs Radcliffe's works, and
charming even as were the works of all her imitators, it was not in them perhaps that human
nature, at least in the midland counties of England, was to be looked for.” 22 Society thought it
was fashionable to read Gothic novels because it was entertaining, well-written, moralizing
and showed the true face of human nature. Nevertheless, Jane Austen does not agree with that.
For her, the Gothic Novel does not provide a faithful representation of life. One of the goals
she probably had in mind when writing Northanger Abbey is to provide a true representation
of the human mind. It also foreshadows the importance of remembering that literature is not
17
real life. There is a reflection about literature itself and how it influences people, especially
young ladies.
Like many Gothic Novels, Northanger Abbey is not characterized by only one genre, it
is multi-faceted. The various genres we are going to examine are very efficient in making the
novel amusing.
The first genre we can associate Northanger Abbey with is, first and foremost, the
Gothic Novel and this for several reasons. First, the title tells us something about the
atmosphere of the novel. Like many Gothic stories, the title mentions a location. In such
novels, the main location is never a mere house or a random construction, it is meant to be
gloomy and mournful. That is why the characters often visit places like castles, abbeys,
churches or monasteries. Here we are presented with an abbey, which soon becomes a cold
and dark place where any creaking sound becomes the cry of the worst creature in the
Catherine about her mental representation of his home: “And are you prepared to encounter
all the horrors that a building such as “what one reads about” may produce?”23 It is even
more explicit in this quotation: “Will not your mind misgive you, when you find yourself in
this gloomy chamber – too lofty and extensive for you,[...]its walls hung with tapestry
exhibiting figures as large as life, and the bed, of dark green stuff or purple velvet, presenting
even a funeral appearance. Will not your heart sink within you?”24 The name of the place
inevitably conveys mystery and darkness, especially because these locations are usually
18
where the murders and the horrid events take place.
In the story, Northanger Abbey is also a mystery for Catherine because it is where
Henry's mother died in mysterious circumstances. The place is made even more mysterious
because of this tragic event. The plot in itself can be interpreted as Gothic. They are several
tendencies one can notice in the majority of the Gothic novels and it is precisely what Jane
Austen is mocking. The young heroin is naïve and from a modest family and the villain is a
Abbey, Catherine is the archetype of the Gothic heroin in the sense that she represents the
perfect victim. She is a young, naïve girl from a family of ten children, the daughter of a
clergyman from the countryside. She meets greedy villain, thirsty for her fantacized fortune
such as the Thorpes and ends up trapped in the abbey by the ultimate villain. General Tilney
represents the archetypical Gothic villain, a predator who reminds us of a powerful, proud and
violent Montoni in Ann Radcliffe's fiction, or even a Dracula – although Dracula was written
The plot is also undoubtedly Gothic in the sense that the order established by society
and by the family sphere is no longer real and the hero has nothing to rely upon. In
Northanger Abbey Catherine is confronted with sinful characters, vices and selfishness. She
comes from a peaceful atmosphere and arrives in Bath, where people never act innocently, for
they always have some kind of motivation. When she eventually leaves Bath and arrives in
Northanger, she realizes how dark the human mind can be. She discovers in one of her
brother's letters how her friend Isabella broke her brother's heart by deceiving him with
Captain Tilney. She also finds out that General Tilney, after he graciously invited her, chased
her away from his abbey, because she had no money and no title. At the end, order is restored
and the words of moral wisdom from the author inevitably follow:“I leave it to be settled by
19
whomsoever it may concern, whether the tendency of his work be altogether to recommend
parental tyranny, or reward filial disobedience.”25 Here Austen's recommendations echo Ann
Radcliffe's in The Mysteries of Udolpho: “O! useful may it be to have shewn, that, though the
vicious can sometimes pour affliction upon the good, [...] and that innocence [...] finally
rewarded at the end of the novel after she resisted her master. Ann Radcliffe and Richardson
have the same intention, that is to encourage their readers to always be virtuous as villainy is
in the end always punished and virtue rewarded. Jane Austen's fiction also resembles a Gothic
novel in that way. Like in Radcliffe's novels, virtue triumphs over villainy. Isabella Thorpe for
instance, plays with James Morland's feelings and her crime is punished when Captain Tilney
But the novel is multi-faceted and thus it is not a purely Gothic. The reader will not be
because it is a parody. All the elements are chosen to resemble Gothic Fiction but they are
actually meant to mock The Mysteries of Udolpho and other novels written by Ann Radcliffe.
In Gothic novels, characters are usually expected to make a morbid discovery. I have in mind
late Gothic novels: Egaeus26 discovering Berenice's teeth in a box, Basil27 unveiling Dorian's
hideous portrait in the attic or Clara Wieland 28 finding someone in her closet. When Catherine
Morland gets up in the middle of the night awakened by a storm, she seems to be driven by
strange forces to open the wardrobe, such suspense is unsettling. In The Romance of the
Forest29, Adeline finds a strange manuscript recounting the story of a former captive of the
20
Abbey in which she is herself held prisoner 30. Jane Austen makes her own passage hilarious
Her quick eyes directly fell on a roll of paper pushed back into the further part of the
cavity, apparently for concealment, and her feelings at that moment were
indescribable. Her heart fluttered, her knees trembled, and her cheeks grew pale. She
seized, with an unsteady hand, the precious manuscript […] Her greedy eye glanced
rapidly over a page. She started as its import. Could it be possible, or did not her
senses play her false? - An inventory of linen, in coarse and modern characters
seemed all that was before her!31
Like many novels of the eighteenth century, Austen's work mocks the sentimental
novel. Jane Austen teases Ann Radcliffe's style from beginning to end. Yet she does not totally
reject the model she is mocking. Indeed, by mocking Ann Radcliffe's moral substance, one
cannot be sure whether she praises virtue or villainy. This issue is actually what is put into
question in her own work. Throughout the novel, Catherine is not always virtuous and Austen
tends to “reward filial disobedience”. Nevertheless, Catherine Morland does triumph over
villainy. She may not have been so virtuous in the beginning, because she was mistaken, naïve
and ignorant, but at the end, she has an epiphany and she becomes enlightened and capable of
reason. She may not have performed any noble or heroic deed or sacrificed herself but she did
Another genre could characterize Northanger Abbey and it is as such compatible with
the Gothic novel: the Bildungsroman. Indeed, the novel recounts a girl's journey from
childhood to womanhood. By meeting different people and going to different places like
Bath's Upper rooms, Pump Room and Northanger Abbey, Catherine learns about life. It is part
of her training as a lady and as a heroine. Henry Tilney is like a mentor to Catherine, she
30 J.M.S Tompkins, Ann Radcliffe and Her Influence on Later Writers, p. 146
31 Jane Austen, Northanger Abbey, Chapter 22
21
admires him and wants to impress him. Isabella is a kind of inspiration as well. It is her who
tells Catherine what she should read and how she should behave with men. Catherine
discovers what friendship really is, Isabella is like a sister to her, showing her how to act in
society and teaching her how to become a lady. She also discovers that sometimes people are
not what they seem to be and that they act out of pure spite. Her most important achievement
is when she understands that reality does not necessarily resemble the reality she read in
books. Isabella Thorpe makes Catherine read Gothic novels as they are very popular amongst
young ladies. This kind of books is very appealing to Catherine because it is scary and erotic:
villains try to seduce young ladies and young ladies manage to resist them. It is a kind of
fantasy for her to become the heroin of a Gothic novel and get trapped in a castle.
Unfortunately, she is so absorbed in her reading that she cannot distinguish what she reads
from reality. When she eventually realizes it, she experiences a kind of epiphany as all the
pieces seem to come together like a jigsaw puzzle. She understands why everybody was
suddenly showing interest in her. Catherine also discovers love and the story ends with her
Finally, the aspect of the genre that interested most people when they read and studied
Northanger Abbey was the satire. It was meant to satirize behaviours, conventions and
literature as we will see in our second part. We can call it a satire because it is a distorted
portrait of society, whose aim is to enlighten the reader by showing its defects. Jane Austen
denounces superficiality, through the portrait of Mrs Allen, greed and avidity through the
portraits of the Thorpes and naiveté through the portrait of Catherine. In her novels, Jane
Austen often deals with specific behavioural features like pride in Pride and Prejudice and
Emma, or cupidity, hypocrisy and jealousy in Northanger Abbey and Sense and Sensibility. It
22
is also a satire criticizing literature. As I said before, this novel is a reflection on literature.
Catherine Morland is the archetype of the dreamy lady who wants real life to resemble the
novels she reads and who wants to model her attitudes and thoughts on the characters she
reads about. It is not just a Gothic novel or a parody. Northanger Abbey is an essay on
literature.
23