... Editing Kim CONTINUE

KALINGA STATE UNIVERSITY 1
College of Public Administration and Indigenous Governance 1
CHAPTER 1
THE PROBLEM
Keywords: Punong Barangay, Profile, Performance, Development,
Barangay, Development of Barangay
Introduction
Punong Barangay also known as a barangay chairman, is the highest
elected official in a barangay ,the smallest level of administrative divisions of the
Philippines..
“islands for good practices to an archipelago of good governance through the
Barangay” Masangkay(2012)
Barangay, type of early Filipino settlement, the word is derived
from balangay, the name for the sailboats that originally brought settlers of Malay
stock to the Philippines from Borneo. Each boat carried a large family group, and
the master of the boat retained power as leader, or datu, of the village
established by his family. Barangay villages sometimes grew to include 30 to 100
families, but the barangays remained isolated from one another. Except
on Mindanao, the part of the Philippines where Islām first got a foothold, no
larger political grouping emerged. This fact greatly facilitated Spanish conquest
of the Philippines in the 16th century, since resistance remained uncoordinated

2
and sporadic. The Spaniards retained the barangay as their basic unit of local
administration in the islands.
Barangay is the smallest unit of Local Government Unit. The barangay
was the basic political unit existing in the Philippines before the arrival of the
Spaniards. When the Spaniards began their 1951 Philippine adventure, there
was no central Philippine Government. But Filipinos then already have a system
of government for they lived in group of about a hundred and thousand people in
villages that could support themselves and their beast of burden which called
Barangay. It was through the barangay that our forebears consulted on matters
of community interest. The revival of the Barangay under Presidential Decree no.
86 has contributed considerably in awakening the interest of our people and
broadening their participation in Government affairs, the conduct of their official
and other matters of public interest. Both the 1986 provision constitutional and
the 1987 constitution recognize the barangay as the basic local government unit
in the country. The barangay serves as the primary planning and implementing
government unit policies, plans, program, project and activities in the community,
and as a forum wherein the collective views of the people may be expressed,
crystallized and considered and where disputed may be amicably settled.
Public administration belongs to Government officials or Public Leader.
These leaders must be effective, dynamic and skilled. Leaders who are good
example to everyone, leaders who have ability to establish unity among people
College of Public Administration and Indigenous Governance 1 3
with different race, needs and beliefs and the most importantly, leaders are well
aware on how to passed laws, approve programs, promulgate policies and
implemented them for the benefits of the people and leaders who can perform
their duties and responsibilities regardless of their profile
Arris and Timminis (1989) as mention by Osinsao (2014) indicated the
education somewhat affect work performance. The lower the education is level of
the less likely people would like better performance
Kotur (2014) in his article, it said that Education is nothing but adjustment
to environment. It implies that a person upon education, will adjust or at least
capable of trying to adjust to the environment, education brings about a change
in the behavior of a person to environment. This concept applies equally well
even to a leader. Upon education the leader will try to adjust to his or her
followers and this brings about a change in the leadership behavior of the leader.
Similarly to idea of Ajinkya Taranekar (2016) in the debate site that
education is not necessary, she said that a good politicians must be a good
leader, who can make good decisions, sympathize with people, have a vision for
the future and of course must know the way to get there. It doesn’t really matter,
if the person owns some degree or not,” what matters is his love for the nation.
The person should be honest, patriot and devoted to the country. And
unfortunately, there is no such degree bestowed for exhibiting these qualities”.
But in contrary, in the study of Mascarenes(2016) as cited by Acharya(2010)
which stated that if the person is educated he/she is more positive towards
changes and they are more receptive to new ways as compared to those having
low level of education.
But the qualification for Punong Barangay never mention that they should
be a high level of education for the Punong barangay to be elected. They must
also be literate, have no criminal records, and be mentally fit and knowledge of
the Philippine law. All individuals who have been declared insane or have been
sentenced for corruption, rebellion or have received any sanction of more than
eighteen months will be automatically disqualified.
On the other hand, the Local Government Code of the Philippines stated
that in each Barangay, there shall be a Punong barangay ,seven (7)
Sangguniang barangay members, the Sangguniang Kabataan chairman, a
barangay secretary, and a barangay treasurer. There shall also be in every
barangay a Lupong Tagapamayapa. The Punong Barangay is the Executive
head of the smallest government. He\She was elected by most of the citizens in
the community. He\She has the power to lead one barangay. Punong Barangay
also are in charge of organizing community programs and promote the welfare of
the community. Leadership Styles have significant effect not only in small
government but also in the Local Government Unit.
Moreover, according to section 388 of Local Government Code of 1991, Person
in Authority, For purposes of the Revised Penal Code, the Punong Barangay,
Sangguniang barangay members, and members of the Lupong Tagapamayapa
in each barangay shall be deemed as persons in authority in their jurisdictions,
while other barangay officials and members who may be designated by law or
ordinance and charged with the maintenance of public order, protection and
security of life and property, or the maintenance of a desirable and balanced
environment, and any barangay member who comes to the aid of persons in
authority, shall be deemed agents of persons in authority.
Performance, according to Acosta And associates (1991) as cited by Cadorna
and Velasco (2008), is equated with the local government response to
community needs for basic and essential public service. High performance result
from rational decision-making, optimal use of resources such as funds,
personnel, equipment and the delivery of basic public services in a timely as
sustained manner.
In addition to this, they mentioned that local government performance is
measurable trough discernible improvement in the quality of life of individuals,
the society, and more importantly the poor. The authors recommend that
performance be assessed in terms of local government capability. They stressed

6
that “ since the level of the local government ‘s capability determines its level of
performance, the higher the level of capability, the higher is the performance”.
Additionally, Cadoma (2008) stated that performance equated with the local
government’s responses to the community’s needs, particularly the provision of
basic and essential public services. High performance is the result of rational
decision-making, optimal use of resources such as funds, personnel, equipment
and the delivery of basic public service in timely a sustained manner.
Performance can be assessed in terms of the local government’s capabilities to
respond to the community’s need for the basic essential services. Local
government performance is then measurable through discernible improvement in
the quality of life of individuals, the society, and more importantly the poor.
Researcher will help in IEC, of the function, Duties and responsibilities of Punong
Barangay.
SEC. 389. Chief Executive: Powers, Duties, and Functions. – Punong
Barangay
(a)The punong barangay, as the chief executive of the barangay
government, shall exercise such powers and perform such duties and
functions, as provided by this Code and other laws.

(b) For efficient, effective and economical governance, the purpose of
which is the general welfare of the barangay and its inhabitants pursuant
to Section 16 of this Code, the punong barangay shall: Chan robles virtual
law library
(1) Enforce all laws and ordinances which are applicable within the
barangay
(2) Negotiate, enter into, and sign contracts for and in behalf of the
barangay, upon authorization of the sangguniang barangay;
(3) Maintain public order in the barangay and, in pursuance thereof, assist
the city or municipal mayor and the sanggunian members in the
performance of their duties and functions;
(4) Call and preside over the sessions of the sangguniang barangay and
the barangay assembly, and vote only to break a tie;
(5) Upon approval by a majority of all the members of the sangguniang
barangay, appoint or replace the barangay treasurer, the barangay
secretary, and other appointive barangay officials;

8
(6) Organize and lead an emergency group whenever the same may be
necessary for the maintenance of peace and order or on occasions of
emergency or calamity within the barangay;
(7) In coordination with the barangay development council, prepare the
annual executive and supplemental budgets of the barangay;
(8) Approve vouchers relating to the disbursement of barangay funds;
(9) Enforce laws and regulations relating to pollution control and protection
of the environment;
(10) Administer the operation of the Katarungang Pambarangay in
accordance with the provisions of this Code;
(11) Exercise general supervision over the activities of the sangguniang
kabataan;
(12) Ensure the delivery of basic services as mandated under Section 17
of this Code;
(13) Conduct an annual palarong barangay which shall feature traditional
sports and disciplines included in national and international games, in
coordination with the Department of Education, Culture and Sports
(14) Promote the general welfare of the barangay;
(15) Exercise such other powers and perform such other duties and
functions as may be prescribed by law or ordinance.
In the performance of his peace and order functions, the punong
barangay shall be entitled to possess and carry the necessary firearm
within his territorial jurisdiction, subject to appropriate rules and
regulations.
“Influence of Age and Gender on the Performance” Bhargava Kotur (2014)
while ,people go with the notion older, adults are normally effective leaders
because of the many years of experience they have, yet results of studies in this
area have not been definitive.
However, Bhargava and Anbazhagan (2014) reported that the age of
leader does impact that leader’s leadership style. The authors suggested that
older leaders may behave differently from younger leaders given a similar
situation
According to Marx (2007) in their article entitled “ Effect of Gender,
education , and age upon leaders” use of Influence Tactics and Full Range
Leadership Behaviors” that the leader’s level of education produced a significant
main effect on the followers , perception of transactional and transformational
behaviors. Significant differences were found among educational level groups for
individuals consideration; those leaders who had earned an advanced degree
exhibited the highest rating level in this obstacle. Leaders educational level
showed no main effect on rating of influence tactics.
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
Barangay Governance Performance Management System (BGPMS) is an
assessment tool for barangays that measures the effective delivery of service
and accomplishments in the performance. BGPMS provides a clear picture of the
performance and productivity level of barangays in the area of Governance.

Dependent Variable Independent Variable
1. Profile of the Punong Barangay

in terms of:
a. Educational attainment
b. Sex
c. Age
d. Civil status
e. Length of service
f. Training Seminar Attended Impact of the Punong
Related to Punong Barangay
Functions and Responsibilities Barangay Profile and
→
2. Level of competencies of the performance on the
Punong Barangay in the
development of Barangays in
implementation of the barangay
programs. the municipality of Balbalan
3. Degree of seriousness of ,Kalinga

problems encountered by the
Punong Barangay in the
implementation of their programs.
4. Factors affecting the

performance of the Punong
Barangays in the implementation
of barangay programs.
Figure 1: Paradigm of the Study

12
Statement of the Problem
This study assessed the competencies of Punong Barangays and
performance and its impact on the development of the barangays in the
Municipality of Balbalan, Kalinga.
1. What is the profile of the Punong Barangays in terms of:
a. Educational Attainment
b .Sex
c. Age
d .Civil Status
e. Length of service
f. Training Seminar Attended Related to Punong Barangay Functions and
Responsibilities
2. What is the level of competence of the Punong Barangays in the
implementation of the barangay programs?
2.1 Are there significant differences in the level of competence of the
Punong Barangays in the implementation of the Barangay Programs
3. What is the degree of seriousness of the problems encountered by the
Punong Barangay in the implementation of barangay program.

3.1 Are there significant differences in the degree of seriousness of
the problems encountered by the Punong Barangay in the implementation
of barangay programs.
4. What are the factors affecting the performance of the Punong Barangays in
the implementation of barangay program.
4.1 Are there significant differences in thefactors affecting the performance
of the Punong Barangays in the implementation of barangay
program.
Importance of the Study
This study assessed the competencies of Punong Barangay Profile and
performance its impact on the Development of Barangay in the Municipality of
Balbalan, Kalinga.
The findings of this study would be beneficial to the following:
Future researchers, This study may be used as reference research that is related
to this topic.
Local Government Unit. This may be used study as a basis to address the
problems drawn to this research.

Punong Barangay. The result of this study was provided them an additional
knowledge regardless of profile.
Sangguniang Barangay. The Barangay Kagawad was benefited this study and
they can have a good relationship as they served the people in their Barangay
Public Administration researches. The study encourages public administration
researchers to look further on the performance of the barangay captain of the
barangay of balbalan.
Definition of Terms
The following terms are defined in the context of its usage in the study
Barangay. This refers to the smallest political unit of the government
Development. This refers to a process that creates growth, progress,
positive change or the addition of physical, economic, environmental,
social and demographic components.
Impact . This refers to the strong effect or influence that something has on
a situation or person.
Municipality. This refers to a city or town that has its own government to
deal with local problems. The group of people who run such a
government.
Performance . This refers to the action or process of carrying out or
accomplishing an action, task or function.

Profile . This refers to the summary or collection of information, especially
about a personPunong Barangay . This refers to the highest elected
official in a barangay
CHAPTER II
METHODS AND PROCEDURE
The chapter presents the research design, population and locale of the
study, data gathering tools, data gathering procedure and statistical tools use to
analyse all data that were gathered to the study.
Research Design
This study made used of the Descriptive type of research in presenting the
data on the profile of the Punong Barangays in terms of: profile of the Punong
Barangays in terms of: Educational Attainment, sex, age,civil status,length of
service and training/Seminar related to Punong Barangay functions and
responsibilities, the level of competence of the Punong Barangays in the
implementation of the barangay programs, the degree of seriousness of the
problems encountered by the Punong Barangay in the implementation of
barangay program and the factors affecting the performance of the Punong
Barangays in the implementation of barangay program
Scope and delimitation of the study
The study focused on the Punong Barangays profile and performance
and its impact on the development of the barangays in the Municipality of

Balbalan, Kalinga, long three (3) barangays of Balbalan, Kalinga, namely,
Mabaca, Buaya and Tawang.
Locale and Population of the study
The respondents of the study composed of the (9) Barangay Council,
comprises of three (3) Barangay Council Officers in each Barangay, five (5)
Barangay Tanod in each Barangay with a total of (15) Barangay Tanod, and 76
community which comprises the (Barangay Health Workers, Women’s
Organization, Youth, People Organization, Religious and Elderly), and are
selected randomly.
The study was conducted at the Municipality of Balbalan, Kalinga.
Balbalan is politically subdivided into fourteen barangays and we had chosen (3 )
three barangays namely: Mabaca, Buaya and Tawang, Balbalan, Kalinga.
Municipality of Balbalan was chosen as locale of the study because
majority of the Punong Barangay in Municipality of Balbalan are High School
Graduate, also mostly of the Punong Barangay were male.

19
Table 1 Respondents of the study are shown in table1 as follows
Respondents NO.OFRESPONDENT
1. Barangay Council 9
2. Barangy Tanod 15
3. Community 76
Total 100
Table 1. Population of the study
Research Instrument
The questionnaire was the main data gathering instrument. The
questionnaire consisted of four parts: Part 1-To look the profile of the Punong
Barangays in terms of Educational Attainment, sex, age, civil status, length of
service and training seminar attended, Part II- To determine the level of
competence of the Punong Barangays in the implementation of the barangay
program , Part III- Determine the degree of seriousness of the problems
encountered by the Punong Barangay in the implementation of barangay
program and Part IV- To determine the factors affecting the performance of the
Punong Barangays in the implementation of barangay program.

Validity and Reliability of the Instrument
The content of the questionnaires were lifted from the study of Marx,
David B. (2007) and other questionnaire was adopted by Pielago (2015) and also
some contents were revised in order to suit the present study. The questionnaire
being lifted from a previous study is deemed valid and reliable.
Gathering Procedure
Upon the approval of the thesis proposal a letter request was sent to the
office of the Punong Barangay for his approval to conduct the study and to float
the questionnaire in his area of responsibility.
The researchers explained to the respondents the purpose of the
proposed questionnaire and assured them of their responses. After securing the
permission, the researchers floated the questionnaire after which they retrieved,
tabulated and analyzed with the help of a statistician.
Treatment of Data
From the retrieved questionnaire the information were collated and
tabulated for statistical treatment:

The Three-Point Likert Scale below was utilized with the descriptive
equivalent as follows:
I. To determine the level of competencies of the Punong Barangay on
the of the implementation of the barangay programs.
Numerical Scale Limits Descriptive Scale Symbol
3 2:61-3:60 Very Much (VMC
Competent
2 1:61-2:60 Competent (MOC)
1 1:00-1:60 Less Competent (LC)
II. Degree of seriousness of problems encountered by the Punong
Barangay in the implementation of their programs.
3 2:61-3:60 Much Serious (MS)
2 1:61-2:60 Moderately (MOS)
Serious
1 1:00-1:60 Less Action (LS)

III. Factors affecting the performance of the Punong Barangays is the
implementation of the barangay programs.
1 2:61-3:60 Very Much Action (VMA)
2 1:61-2:60 Much Action (MA)
3 1:00-1:60 Less Action (LA)
Statistical Tools
This study will make use of the statistical technique in analyzing the data
gathered.
The simple frequency and percentage count will be used to analyze the
profile of the respondents. The formula is:
P= F × 1100
Where:
P = percentage
F = Frequency
Weighted Mean. This will be used to qualify the response of the respondents
using the formula below.
Xw = WIFI
Fi
Where:
Xw – Weighted Mean
WIFI = Sum of Weighted Mean
FI = Number of Respondents / Cases
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA).This was used to test if there was a significance
difference on the responses when grouped according to variables of age, sex,
civil status, and educational attainment.

The procedures are as follows (Downie, 1983)
The null hypothesis was accepted if the computed F- ratio was lesser than the F-
tabular value at .05 level of significance . On the other hand, the null hypothesis
is rejected if the F-ratio is greater than the F-tabular value at .05 level of
significance
CHAPTER III
PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA
This chapter presents the salient findings, presentation and interpretation
of the study on the profile of the Punong barangays and performance.
Table 1.Profile of the Respondents
AGES Frequency Percentage Rank
21-30 24 24.00% 3
31-40 32 32.00% 1
41-50 25 25.00% 2
51-ABOVE 19 19.00% 4
TOTAL 100 100.00%
GENDER
MALE 47 47.00% 1
FEMALE 53 53.00% 2
TOTAL 100 100.00%
CIVIL STATUS
SINGLE 45 45.00% 2
MARRIED 48 48.00% 1
WIDOW 7 7.00% 3
TOTAL 100 100.00%
LENGTH OF SERVICE
1-3 YEARS 20 20.00% 2
4-6 YEARS 15 15.00% 4
7-8 YEARS 46 46.00% 1
9 TEARS ABOVE 19 19.00% 3
TOTAL 100 100.00%
EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
ELEMENTARY GRADUATE 2 2.00% 5
HIGH SCHOOL LEVEL 11 11.00% 3
HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATE 10 10.00% 4
COLLEGE LEVEL 24 24.00% 2
COLLEGE GRADUATE 53 53.00% 1
TOTAL 100 100.00%
TRAININGS/SEMINARS ATTENDED
1. Local Government 12 12.00% 5
2. Legislative orientation of Punong 4
Barangay 14 14.00%
3. Barangay development Program
formulation 26 26.00% 1
4. Strengthening of Barangay Anti-drug 3
abuse council 23 23.00%
5. Disaster risk reduction and management 25 25.00% 2
TOTAL 100 100.00%
As presented on the age grouping, 32% are from the 31-40 years old;
25% are from the 41-50 years old; 24% are from the 21-30 years old; and 19%
are from the 51 years old and above.
As presented on the gender grouping, the female group got the higher
percentage of 53% or 53 respondents while the male group got 47% or 47
respondents.
The civil status grouping revealed that there are 48% or 48 respondents
that are married; 45% or 45 respondents are single; and 7% 0r 7 respondents
are widows.
As gleaned on the table, 46% or 46 respondents are 7-8 years in service;
20% or 20 respondents are 1-3 years in service; 19% or 19 respondents are 9
year above in service; 15% or 15 respondents are 4-6 years in service.
The educational attainment grouping presented that 53% or 53
respondents are college graduate; 24% or 24 respondents are college

undergraduates; 11% or 11 respondents are high school graduate; 10% or 10
respondents are high school undergraduate; and 2% or 2 respondents are
elementary graduate.
The trainings/seminars attended grouping presented that 26% or 26
respondents attended the Barangay development program formulation; 25% or
25 respondents attended the Disaster risk reduction and management seminar;
23% or 23 respondents attended the strengthening of barangay anti-drug abuse
council seminar; 14% or 14 respondents attended the Legislative orientation of
Punong Barangay; and 12% or 12 respondents attended the local government
trainings/seminars.
Level of competencies of the Punong Barangays in the implementation of the
Barangay programs in the Municipality of Balbalan, Kalinga, as perceived by the
Barangay Council.
Table 2 Presents the analysed responses of respondents on the level of
competencies of the Punong Barangays in the implementation of the Barangay
programs in the Municipality of Balbalan, Kalinga, as perceived by the Barangay
Council.
Table 2. Level of competencies of the Punong Barangays in the implementation
of the Barangay programs in the Municipality of Balbalan, Kalinga, as perceived
by the Barangay Council (n=9)
INDICATORS MC MOC LC XW DE RANK
Barangay Legislation
1.Formulated sangguniang Internal 6 1 2

Rules of Procedure (18) (2) (2) 2.44 MOC 3
2.Implemented sangguniang Barangay 4 5 (0)

Internal Rules of Procedure (12) (10 0 2.44 MOC
6 3 0
3.Conduct of Regular Sessions (18) (6) (0) 2.67 MC 2
4.Enactment of General/ Regulatory 8 1 0
Ordinance in the preceding year (24) (2) (0) 2.89 MC 1
6 3 0
5. Adoption of resolution (18) (6) (0) 2.67 MC
Sub-area mean 2.62 MC
Transparency
6. Posted annual Summary of Income
and expenditures the preceding year in 7 2 0 1
conspicuous place (21) (4) (0) 2.78 MC
7. Posted barangay Ordinance and

resolution of preceding year in at least 6 2 1
three conspicuous place (18) (14) 1 2.56 MOC 2
Sub- area mean 2.67 MC
Citizens Participation
9 0 0
8. Conduct of barangay assembly (27) (0) (0) 3.00 MC
Development Planning
9. Conduct of barangay development
council meetings at least once every 7 2 0 1
six months (21) (4) (0) 2.78 MC
10. Implementation of barangay 5 4 0

development plan (15) (8) (0) 2.56 MOC 2
11. Formulation of Annual Investment 4 5 0

Program of the preceding year (12) (10) (0) 2.44 MOC 3
Sub-area mean 2.59 MOC

Revenue Generation
12.Enacted barangay tax ordinance 7 1 1 2
with public hearing (21) (2) (1) 2.67 MC
13.Conducted barangay fund raising 3 2 5 4
activity (9) (1) (5) 1.78 MOC
14.General income from barangay 5 2 2 3
economic enterprises (15) (4) (1) 2.33 MOC
15. Updated the barangay revenue 9 0 0 3.00 MC 1
KALINGA STATE UNIVERSITY 1 31
code (0)
16. Implemented financial management
system following Commission on Audit 7 2 0
(COA) standards (21) (4) (0) 2.78 MC
Sub- area mean 2.51 MOC
Facilities and Customer Service
a. Presence of barangay hall with the
following administrative requirements
4 3 2
17. Barangay seal display (12) (6) (1) 2.22 MOC 1
18. Philippines flag in the barangay hall 4 2 3

premises (12) (4) (3) 2.11 MOC 2
19. Picture of incumbent president 3 2 4

displayed in the office (9) (4) (4) 1.89 MOC 3
20. Organizational chart displayed in 2 3 4

the barangay hall (6) (6) (4) 1.78 MOC 4
b. Presence of functional properties
and equipment in the barangay hall as
support to the operation of the
barangay
21. Office equipment such as 7 2 0

typewriter/ computer (21) (4) (0) 2.78 MC 2
22. Communication facilities (internet 5 2.00 MOC
connection, telephone and fax machine 2 (10) 2

(6) (2) 4
23. Transportation facilities (Patrol 6 0 3
vehicle/ service vehicle/ ambulance (18) (0) (3) 2.33 MOC 3
24. Emergency equipment such as 5 2 2

generators (15) (4) (2) 2.33 MOC
25. Established barangay public 9 0 0
information desk (27) (0) (0) 3.00 MC 1
c. Implemented the Citizens charter
2 4 3
26. Posted in conspicuous places (6) (8) (3) 1.89 MOC 2
3 4 2
27. Printed the citizens charter (9) (8) (2) 2.11 MOC 1
Social Services
a. Presence of the following health and
nutrition program implementers
9 0 0 1
28. Barangay Nutrition Scholar (27) (0) (0) 3.00 MC
9 0 0
29. Barangay Health Workers (27) (0) (0) 3.00 MC 2
b. Presence of health nutrition facilities
3 2 4
30. Botikang Bayan (9) (4) (4) 1.89 MOC 3
4 4 1
31. Public Comfort Room (12) (8) (1) 2.33 MOC
6 0 3
32. Communal Garden (18) (0) (3) 2.33 MOC 2
9 0 0
33. Barangay Health Station (27) (0) (0) 3.00 MC 1
c. Advocate on Health and Nutrition
Programs
9 0 0
34. Operation Timbang (27) (0) (0) 3.00 MC 1
7 2 0 2
35. Oplan Food Supplementation (21) (14) (0) 2.78 MC
6 3 0
36. 4s dengue prevention (18) (6) (0) 2.67 MC 3
9 0 0
37. Senior Citizen Program (27) (0) (0) 3.00 MC
Sub- area mean 2.70 MC
Education, Culture and Sports
a. Established Education / Information
Facilities
8 (2) 0
38. Daycare Center (24) 1(2) (0) 2.89 MC 1
39. Information, Learning and Reading 4 2 3
Center (12) (4) (3) 2.11 MOC 2

Economic Development
1.Agriculture and Fisheries 31
Development
41. Presence of Multi-purpose 6 2 1 1

pavement (18) (4) (1) 2.56 MOC
42. Presence of planting material 4 0 5 3

distribution system (12) (0) (5) 1.89 MOC
43. Presence of farm product collection 2 1 6
and buying station (6) (2) (6) 1.56 NC 4
Environmental Management
1.Natural resources management
a. Implementation of clean and green
activates
44. Conduct of clean and green 9 0 0
activates (27) (0) (0) 3.00 MC 1
b. Waste Management and pollution
control
45. Enact ordinance / resolution on 6 3 0
Solid Waste Management System (18) (6) (0) 2.67 MC 2
46. Presence of material recovery 2 6 1
facility in the barangay (6) (12) (1) 2.11 MOC 3
47. Maintained of sewage/ drainage 3 4
canal 2 (6) (4) 1.78 MOC
(6) 4

TAWM 2.47 MOC
As cited on the table, the barangay councils perceived that level of
programs in the Municipality of Balbalan, Kalinga is moderately competent based
from the obtained total average weighted mean of 2.47.
The first highest sub-area mean 3.00 was acquired by the “Citizens
Participation”. This implies that the punong barangays are much competent in
conducting barangay assemblies and that the community are highly supportive in
the assemblies as shown on the table.
Ranked second was acquired by the “Social Services” having a sub-area
mean of 2.70 which implies that the social services offered by the barangay
much competent with the presence of the different health and nutrition program
implementers. This also implies that they advocate Health and Nutrition
Programs much competently with the presence of the following programs
“Operation Timbang”; “Oplan Food Supplementation”; “4s dengue prevention”;
and
“Senior Citizen Program”. The barangay councils rated the aforementioned
programs as much competent with weighted mean of 3.00, 2.78, 2.67 and 3.00
respectively.
“Transparency” was ranked third having a sub-area mean of 2.67 which
implies that the punong barangays are much competent in implementing
programs that entails the value transparency.
“Economic Development” acquired the lowest sub-area mean of 2.03. This
manifests that the punong barangays were moderately competent on the
economic development of the barangay were the study was conducted. The
program under economic development which was “Presence of farm product
collection and buying station” was rated as never competent implying that there
is probably no farm product collection and buying station in the barangay.
Barangay Tanod.
Table 3. Presents the analyzed responses of respondents on the level of

programs in the Municipality of Balbalan, Kalinga, as perceived by the Barangay
Tanod.
Table 3. Level of competencies of the Punong Barangays in the
implementation of the Barangay programs in the Municipality of Balbalan,
Kalinga as perceived by the Barangay Tanod(n=15)
INDICATORS
MC MOC LC XW DE RANK
1.Formulated Sangguniang Internal 10 5 0

Rules of Procedure (30) (10) (0) 2.67 MC 1
2.Implemented sangguniang
Barangay Internal Rules of 7 7 1
Procedure (21) (14) (1) 2.40 MOC 4
10 5 0
3.Conduct of Regular Sessions (30) (10) (0) 2.67 MC
4.Enactment of General/ Regulatory 7 8 0
Ordinance in the preceding year (21) (16) (0) 2.47 MOC 3
10 4 1
5. Adoption of resolution (30) (8) (1) 2.60 MOC 2
2.56 MOC
Transparency
6. Posted annual Summary of 3 11 1 2.13 MOC 2
Income and expenditures the (9) (22) (1)

preceding year in conspicuous
place
7. Posted barangay Ordinance and
resolution of preceding year in at 6 8 1
least three conspicuous place (18) (16) (1) 2.33 MOC 1
Sub –area mean 2.23 MOC
13 2 0
8. Conduct of barangay assembly (39) (4) (0) 2.87 MC
9. Conduct of barangay
development council meetings at 11 3 1
least once every six months (33) (6) (1) 2.67 MC 1
development plan (30) (10) (0) 2.67 MC 1
11. Formulation of Annual
Investment Program of the 6 8 1
preceding year (18) (16) (1) 2.33 MOC 2
Revenue Generation
12.Enacted barangay tax ordinance 12 3 0
with public hearing (24) (6) (0) 2.80 MC 1
13.Conducted barangay fund 4 4 7
raising activity (12) (8) (7) 1.80 MOC 4
14.General income from barangay 3 10 2
economic enterprises (9) (20) (2) 2.07 MOC 3
15. Updated the barangay revenue 12 3 0 2.80 MC 1
code (24) (6) (0)

16. Implemented financial
management system following
Commission on Audit (COA) 11 4 0
standards (22) (8) (0) 2.73 MC 2
Facilities and Customer Service
a. Presence of barangay hall with
the following administrative
requirements
5 3 7
18. Philippines flag in the barangay 7 2 6
hall premises (21) (4) (6) 2.07 MOC 2
19. Picture of incumbent president 5 4 6
displayed in the office (15) (8) (6) 1.93 MOC 3
20. Organizational chart displayed 7 4 4
in the barangay hall (21) (8) (4) 2.20 MOC 1
b. Presence of functional properties
and equipment in the barangay hall
as support to the operation of the
barangay
typewriter/ computer (26) (2) (1) 2.80 MC 1
22. Communication facilities
(internet connection, telephone and 4 2 9
fax machine (12) (4) (9) 1.67 MOC 4
23. Transportation facilities (Patrol 3 1 11 1.47 MC 5
vehicle/ service vehicle/ ambulance (9) (2) (11)

24. Emergency equipment such as 5 7 3
generators (15) (14) (3) 2.13 MOC 3
information desk (27) (12) (0) 2.60 MOC 2
c. Implemented the Citizens charter
3 6 6
26. Posted in conspicuous places (9) 12) (6) 1.80 MOC 1
4 5 6
Social Services
a. Presence of the following health
and nutrition program implementers
14 1 0
28. Barangay Nutrition Scholar (42) (2) (0) 2.93 MC 1
7 5 3
29. Barangay Health Workers (21) (10) (3) 2.27 MOC 2
b. Presence of health nutrition
facilities
6 2 7
6 2 7
31. Public Comfort Room (18) (4) (7) 1.93 MOC 3
8 3 4
14 1 0
33. Barangay Health Station (42) (2) (0) 2.93 MC 1
41
c. Advocate on Health and Nutrition

Programs
14 1 0
10 4 1
35. Oplan Food Supplementation (30) (8) (1) 2.60 MOC 3
8 7 0
36. 4s dengue prevention (24) (14) (0) 2.53 MOC 1
10 5 0
37. Senior Citizen Program (30) (10) (0) 2.67 MC 2
Education, Culture and Sports
a. Established Education /
Information Facilities
14 1 0
38. DaycareCenter (42) (2) (0) 2.93 MC 1
39. Information, Learning and 5 3 7
Reading Center (15) (6) (7) 1.87 MOC 2
1.Agriculture and Fisheries
Development
40. Presence of tresher and other 6 7 2
post-harvest equipment (18) (14) (2) 2.27 MOC 2
41. Presence of Multi-purpose 7 6 2
pavement (21) (12) (2) 2.33 MOC 1
42. Presence of planting material 7 6

1.73 MOC 3
distribution system 2 (14) (6)
42
(6)
43. Presence of farm product 0 2 13
collection and buying station (0) (4) (13) 1.13 MC 4
a. Implementation of clean and
green activates

activates (15) (10) (5) 2.00 MOC 2
b. Waste Management and
pollution control
45. Enact ordinance / resolution on 5 5 5
Solid Waste Management System (15) (10) (5) 2.00 MOC 2
46. Presence of material recovery 4 11 0

facility in the barangay (12) (22) (0) 2.27 MOC 1
47. Maintained of sewage/ drainage 4 5 6
canal (12) (10) (6) 1.87 MOC 3
TAWM 2.31 MOC
As gleaned on the table, the barangay tanod perceived that level of
programs in the Municipality of Balbalan, Kalinga was moderately competent
based from the obtained total average weighted mean of 2.31.

43
The first highest sub-area mean 2.87 was acquired by the “Citizens
Participation”. This implies that the punong barangays were much competent in
conducting barangay assemblies and that the community were highly supportive
in the assemblies as shown on the table.
Ranked second was acquired by the “Barangay Legislation”; and
“Development Planning” having a sub-area mean of 2.56. This implies that the
punong barangays were moderately competent in enacting or implementing the
barangay legislations. The development planning of the barangay or municipality
was also perceived as moderately competent although programs such as
“Conduct of barangay development council meetings at least once every six
months”; and “Implementation of barangay development plan” were rated as
much competent as revealed by their weighted mean of 2.67. However, the
“Formulation of Annual Investment Program of the preceding year” was not
effectively implemented as evidenced by the weighted mean of 2.33.
“Economic Development” acquired the lowest sub-area mean of 1.87. This
manifests that the punong barangays were moderately competent on the
economic development of the barangay were the study was conducted. The
program under economic development which is “Presence of farm product
collection and buying station” was rated as never competent implying that there
is probably no farm product collection and buying station in the barangay. Thus,
44
the programs under the economic development were not successfully
implemented by the punong barangays as perceived by the barangay tanod.
Community
Table 4. Presents the analyzed responses of respondents on the level of
programs in the Municipality of Balbalan, Kalinga, as perceived by the
Community
Table 4. Level of competencies of the Punong Barangays in the
Kalinga, as perceived by the Community (n=76)

INDICATORS MC MOC LC XW DE Rank
1.Formulated sangguniang 52 23 1
Internal Rules of Procedure (156) (46) (1) 2.67 MC 2
2.Implemented sangguniang
Barangay Internal Rules of 36 31 9
Procedure (108) (62) (9) 2.36 MOC 5
56 20 0
3.Conduct of Regular Sessions (168) (40) (0) 2.74 MC 1
4.Enactment of General/
Regulatory Ordinance in the 39 32 6
preceding year (117) (64) (6) 2.46 MOC 4
54 27 4
5. Adoption of resolution (135) (54) (4) 2.54 MOC 3
Transparency
6. Posted annual Summary of
Income and expenditures the
preceding year in conspicuous 42 23 11
place (126) (46) (11) 2.41 MOC 1

7. Posted barangay Ordinance
and resolution of preceding year
in at least three conspicuous 35 21 20
place (105) (42) (20) 2.20 MOC 2
8. Conduct of barangay 46 20 10
assembly (138) (40) (10) 2.47 MOC 3
9. Conduct of barangay
development council meetings 50 20 6
at least once every six months (150) (40) (6) 2.58 MOC 2
development plan (120) (38) (17) 2.30 MOC 4
11. Formulation of Annual
Investment Program of the 55 15 6
preceding year (165) (30) (6) 2.64 MC 1
Revenue Generation
12.Enacted barangay tax 60 15 1
ordinance with public hearing (180) (30) (1) 2.78 MC 1

13.Conducted barangay fund 62 9 5
raising activity (186) (18) (5) 2.75 MC 2
14.General income from 42 28 6
barangay economic enterprises (126) (56) (6) 2.47 MOC 4
15. Updated the barangay 35 (52) 15
revenue code (105) 26 (15) 2.26 MOC 5
16. Implemented financial
management system following
Commission on Audit (COA) 56 15 5
standards (168) (30) (5) 2.67 MC 3
Facilities and Customer
Service
a. Presence of barangay hall
with the following administrative
requirements
50 15 11
18. Philippines flag in the 60 10 8
barangay hall premises (180) (20) (8) 2.74 MC 2
19. Picture of incumbent 55 12 9 2.61 MC 3

president displayed in the office (165) (24) (9)
20. Organizational chart 62 9 5
displayed in the barangay hall (186) (18) (5) 2.75 MC 1
b. Presence of functional
properties and equipment in the
barangay hall as support to the
operation of the barangay
typewriter/ computer (138) (40) (10) 2.47 MOC 2
22. Communication facilities
(internet connection, telephone 26 35 15
and fax machine (78) (70) (15) 2.14 MOC 3
23. Transportation facilities
(Patrol vehicle/ service vehicle/
ambulance 15(45) 56(112) 5(5) 2.13 MOC 4
24. Emergency equipment such 569 59 15
as generators (168) (10) (15) 2.54 MOC 1
information desk (180) (30) (1) 2.78 MC 1
c. Implemented the Citizens
charter
49
26. Posted in conspicuous 20 46 10
places (60) (92) (10) 2.13 MOC 3
15 60 1
Social Services
a. Presence of the following
health and nutrition program
implementers
35 26 15
28. Barangay Nutrition Scholar (105) (52) (15) 2.26 MOC 2
60 15 1
29. Barangay Health Workers (180) (30) (1) 2.78 MC 1
b. Presence of health nutrition
facilities
15 60 1
62 9 5
31. Public Comfort Room (186) (18) (50 2.75 MC 1
20 46 10

15 56 5
33. Barangay Health Station (45 (112) (5) 2.13 MOC
c. Advocate on Health and
Nutrition Programs
55 12 9
35. Oplan Food 62 9 5
Supplementation (186) (18) (5) 2.75 MC 1
60 10 6
36. 4s dengue prevention (180) (20) (6) 2.71 MC 2
70 6 0
37. Senior Citizen Program (210) (12) (0) 2.92 MC
Education, Culture and
Sports
a. Established Education /
Information Facilities
67 7 2
38. Daycare Center (201) (14) (2) 2.86 MC 1
39. Information, Learning and 26 25 25
Reading Center (78) (50) (25) 2.01 MOC 2

1.Agriculture and Fisheries
Development
40. Presence of tresher and 40 30 6
other post-harvest equipment (120) (60) (6) 2.45 MOC 3
41. Presence of Multi-purpose 50 20 6
pavement (150) (40) (6) 2.58 MOC 2
42. Presence of planting 30 30 16
material distribution system (90) (60) (16) 2.18 MOC 4
43. Presence of farm product 40 36 10
collection and buying station (120) (72) (10) 2.66 MC 1
1.Natural resources
management
a. Implementation of clean and
green activates
activates (120) (60) (6) 2.45 MOC 2
b. Waste Management and

52
pollution control
45. Enact ordinance / resolution
on Solid Waste Management 50 20 6
System (150) (40) (6) 2.58 MOC 1
46. Presence of material 35 20 21
recovery facility in the barangay (105) (40) (21) 2.18 MOC 3
47. Maintained of sewage/ 30 20 26
drainage canal (90) (40) (26) 2.05 MOC 4
TAWM 2.40 MOC
As gleaned on the table, the community perceived that level of
programs in the Municipality of Balbalan, Kalinga was moderately competent
based from the obtained total average weighted mean of 2.40.
“Revenue Generation” was ranked first with a sub-area mean of 2.59
implying that the barangay or municipality was moderately competent in
conducting programs in the revenue generation. As revealed on the table the
punong barangays had successfully ennacted barangay tax ordinance with public
hearing; Conducted barangay fund raising activity; and Implemented financial
management system following Commission on Audit (COA) standards as

evidenced by the weighted mean of 2.78, 2.75 and 2.67 respectively. However,
they were not competent enough in updating the barangay revenue code, and in
generating income from barangay economic enterprises.
Ranked second was acquired by the “Barangay Legislation” having a sub-
area mean of 2.55. This implies that the punong barangays were moderately
competent in enacting or implementing the barangay legislations although they
were significantly competent in formulating the Sangguniang Internal Rules of
Procedure and in conducting regular sessions as evidenced by the weighted mean of 2.67
and 2.74 respectively.
“Transparency” was ranked as the lowest as evidenced by its sub-area
mean of 2.30 or moderately competent. This implies that the punong barangays
were not regularly posting the barangay annual summary of income and
expenditures the preceding year in conspicuous place and in posting barangay
ordinance and resolution of preceding year in at least three conspicuous place.
Comparison among the perceptions of the barangay council, barangay tanod,
and the community on the implementation of the Barangay programs in the
Municipality of Balbalan, Kalinga

Table 5. Presents the comparison among the perceptions perceptions of
the barangay council, barangay tanod, and the community on the implementation
of the Barangay programs in the Municipality of Balbalan, Kalinga
Table 5. Comparison among the perceptions of the barangay council,
barangay tanod, and the community on the implementation of the Barangay
programs in the Municipality of Balbalan, Kalinga
Barangay Barangay
INDICATORS Council Tanod Community XW DE Rank
Barangay
Legislation
1.Formulated
sangguniang
Internal Rules of
Procedure
2.67 2.67 2.59 MOC
2.Implemented
sangguniang
Barangay Internal
Rules of
2.44 2.40 2.36 2.40 MOC
Procedure
3.Conduct of
Regular Sessions
2.67 2.67 2.74 2.69 MC
4.Enactment of
General/
Regulatory
Ordinance in the
preceding year
2.89 2.47 2.46 2.61 MC
5. Adoption of
resolution
2.67 2.60 2.54 2.60 MOC
sub area mean
2.62 2.56 2.55 2.58 MOC 2
Transparency
6. Posted annual
Summary of
Income and
expenditures the
preceding year in
conspicuous place
2.78 2.13 2.41 2.44 MOC
7. Posted
barangay
Ordinance and
2.56 2.33 2.20 2.36 MOC
resolution of
preceding year in
at least three
conspicuous place
sub area mean

2.67 2.23 2.30 2.40 MOC 7
Citizens
Participation
8. Conduct of
barangay
assembly
3.00 2.87 2.47 2.78 MC 1
Development
Planning
9. Conduct of
barangay
development
council meetings
at least once every
six months
2.78 2.67 2.58 2.67 MC
10.
Implementation of
barangay
2.56 2.67 2.30 2.51 MOC
development plan
11. Formulation of
Annual Investment
Program of the
preceding year
2.44 2.33 2.64 2.47 MOC
sub area mean
2.59 2.56 2.50 2.55 MOC 4
Revenue
Generation
12.Enacted
barangay tax
ordinance with
public hearing
2.67 2.80 2.78 2.75 MC
13.Conducted
barangay fund
raising activity
1.78 1.80 2.75 2.11 MOC
14.General income
from barangay
economic
enterprises
2.33 2.07 2.47 2.29 MOC
15. Updated the
barangay revenue
3.00 2.80 2.26 2.69 MC
code
16. Implemented
financial
management
system following
Commission on
Audit (COA)
standards
2.78 2.73 2.67 2.73 MC
sub area mean
2.51 2.44 2.59 2.51 MOC 5
Facilities and
Customer
Service
a. Presence of
barangay hall with
the following
administrative
requirements
17. Barangay seal
display
2.22 1.87 2.51 2.20 M0C
18. Philippines flag
in the barangay
2.11 2.07 2.74 2.30 MOC
59
hall premises
19. Picture of
incumbent
president
displayed in the
office
1.89 1.93 2.61 2.14 MOC
20. Organizational
chart displayed in
the barangay hall

1.78 2.20 2.75 2.24 MOC
b. Presence of
functional
properties and
equipment in the
barangay hall as
support to the
operation of the
barangay
21. Office
equipment such as
typewriter/
computer
2.78 2.80 2.47 2.68 MC
22.
Communication
facilities (internet
connection,
telephone and fax
machine
2.00 1.67 2. 14 1.94 MOC
23. Transportation
facilities (Patrol
vehicle/ service
vehicle/
ambulance
2.33 1.47 2.13 1.98 MOC
24. Emergency
equipment such as
generators
2.33 2.13 2.54 2.34 MOC
25. Established
barangay public
information desk
3.00 2.60 2.78 2.79 MC
c. Implemented
the Citizens
charter
26. Posted in
1.89 1.80 2.13 1.94 MOC
conspicuous
places
27. Printed the
citizens charter
2.11 1.87 2.18 2.05 MOC
sub area mean
2.22 2.04 2.45 2.24 MOC 8
Social Services
a. Presence of the
following health
and nutrition
program
implementers
28. Barangay
Nutrition Scholar
3.00 2.93 2.26 2.73 MC
29. Barangay
Health Workers
3.00 2.27 2.78 2.68 MC
b. Presence of
health nutrition
facilities
30. Botikang
Bayan
1.89 1.93 2.18 2.00 MOC
31. Public Comfort
2.33 1.93 2.75 2.34 MOC
Room
32. Communal
Garden
2.33 2.27 2.13 2.24 MOC
33. Barangay
Health Station
3.00 2.93 2.13 2.69 MC
c. Advocate on
Health and
Nutrition Programs
34. Operation
Timbang
3.00 2.93 2.61 2.85 MC
35. Oplan Food
Supplementation
2.78 2.60 2.75 2.71 MC
36. 4s dengue
prevention
2.67 2.53 2.71 2.64 MC
37. Senior Citizen
Program
3.00 2.67 2.92 2.86 MC
sub area mean
2.70 2.50 2.52 2.57 MOC 3
Education,
Culture and
Sports
a. Established
Education /
Information
Facilities
38. DaycareCenter
2.89 2.93 2.86 2.89 MC
39. Information,
Learning and
Reading Center
2.11 1.87 2.01 2.00 MOC
sub area mean
2.50 2.40 2.43 2.44 MOC 6
Economic
Development
1.Agriculture and
Fisheries
Development
40. Presence of
tresher and other
post-harvest
equipment
2.11 2.27 2.45 2.28 MOC
41. Presence of
Multi-purpose
pavement
2.56 2.33 2.58 2.49 MOC
42. Presence of
1.89 1.73 2.18 1.94 MOC
planting material
distribution system
43. Presence of
farm product
collection and
buying station
1.56 1.13 2.66 1.78 MOC
sub area mean
2.03 1.87 2.47 2.12 MOC 10
Environmental
Management
1.Natural
resources
management
a. Implementation
of clean and green
activates
44. Conduct of
clean and green
activates
3.00 2.00 2.45 2.48 MOC
b. Waste
Management and
pollution control
45. Enact
ordinance /
resolution on Solid
Waste
Management
System
2.67 2.00 2.58 2.42 MOC
46. Presence of
material recovery
facility in the
barangay
2.11 2.27 2.18 2.19 MOC
47. Maintained of
sewage/ drainage
canal
1.78 1.87 2.05 1.90 MOC
sub area mean
2.39 2.03 2.32 2.25 MOC 9
TAWM
2.47 2.31 2.40 2.39 MOC
As gleaned on the table, the three respondent respondents perceived that
the level of competencies of the Punong Barangays in the implementation of the
Barangay programs in the Municipality of Balbalan, Kalinga is moderately
competent based from the obtained total average weighted mean of 2.39.
The table further showed that the three respondents first ranked the
citizens participation as much competent with an average weighted mean of 2.78
implying that barangay assemblies were highly executed by the implementers
and were remarkably supported by the community.
The table showed that the three respondents second ranked the Barangay
Legislation as Moderately Competent with an average weighted mean of 2.58
implying that the barangay internal rules and regulation and Adoption of
resolution were good executed by the implementers.
The table showed that the three respondents third ranked the Social services
have an average weighted mean of 2.57 which implies that the social services
offered by the barangays is Moderately Competent with the presence of the
different Health and Nutrition Programs Implementers.
‘’Environmental Management’’ was ranked as the lowest having an average
weighted mean of 2.25. This implies that Punong Barangays are Moderately
Competent on the Environmental Management of the barangay were the study
conducted. The Program under Environmental Management which is
‘’Implementation of Clean and Green activities’’ was rated as never competent
implying that there is probably no maintaining of Sewage / Drainage Canal in the

barangay. Thus the programs under Environmental Management were not
successfully implemented.
“Economic Development” was ranked as the lowest having an average weighted
mean of 2.12. This implies that competencies under economic development are
not fully or successfully implemented.
Based on the table, the comparison of perception of the 3 groups of
Respondents on the Competencies of the Punong Barangay on the
implementation of the barangay programs got rating varying degrees. Of the
three Respondents, Barangay Council, Barangay Tanod and Community
answered ‘’Moderately Competent’’.
Table.6 Summary of the Single Factor ANOVA on the level of awareness of
the respondents on the implementation of the Barangay programs in the
SUMMARY
Groups Count Sum Average Variance

Barangay
Council 47 115.89 2.4657 0. 17855
Barangay
Tanod 47 108.33 2.305 0.20981
TOTAL 47 116.51 2.479 0.06203
ANOVA
Source of P-
Variation SS DF MS F value F crit
Between
Groups 0.882 2 0.4411 2.93804 0.056 3.062
Within Groups 20.72 138 0.1501
Total 21.6 140
Decision: Not Significant/ Ho Accepted
The table shows that the f-computed ANNOVA which is 2.93804 is less
than the F-critical which is 3.062 at 0.05 level of significance. Hence, the null
hypothesis that there is no significant difference on the perceptions of the
respondents on the implementation of the Barangay programs in the Municipality
of Balbalan, Kalinga is accepted.

In other words, there is no significant difference on the perception of the
respondents.
Degree of seriousness of problems encountered by the Punong barangay in the
implementation of their program in the Municipality of Balbalan, Kalinga, as
perceived by theBarangay Council
Table 7. Presents the analyzed responses of respondents on the degree
of seriousness of problems encountered by the Punong barangay in the
implementation of their program in the municipality of Balbalan, Kalinga ,as
perceived by the Barangay Council.
Table 7. The degree of seriousness of problems encountered by the Punong
barangay in the implementation of their program in the municipality of Balbalan,
Kalinga ,as perceived by the Barangay Council (N-9)
INDICATORS MS MOS LS XW DE RANK
4 4 1
1.Lack of funds (12) (8) (1) 2.60 MOS 1
4 3 3
2.Lack of trainings and seminars (12) (6) (3) 2.07 MOS 3

70
3.Poor participation of 3 4 2
constituents (9) (8) (2) 2.07 MOS 3
4 3 3
4.Educational attainment (12) (6) (3) 2.07 MOS 3
5. Poor delivery of services/Public

4 3 1
services in promoting of general
(12) (6) (1)
welfare of the barangay 2.20 MOS 2
6.Lack of maintaining peace and 5 4 0
order of the barangay (15) (8) (0) 2.00 MOS 4
7.Lack of enforcing all laws and
ordinance which are applicable 6 6
with the barangay (16) (3) 2.07 MOS 3
8.Lack of coordination with in the
barangay development council
preparing the annual executive
and supplemental budgets of the

2 3 4
barangay (6) (18) (4) 1.87 MOS 5
TAWM 2.12 MOS

71
As gleaned on the table, the barangay councils perceived that the degree
implementation of their program in the municipality of Balbalan, Kalinga is
moderately serious based from the obtained total average weighted mean of
2.12.
“Lack of funds” acquired the highest weighted mean of 2.60 or moderately
serious. Lack of fund was the number one problem as perceived by the barangay
councils which impede the successful implementation of the different programs of
the barangay.
“Poor delivery of services/Public services in promoting of general welfare
of the barangay” ranked second having a weighted mean of 2.20 or Moderately
Serious. This implies that the implementer of programs delivers poorly the
services in promoting of general welfare of the barangay.
perceived by the Barangay Tanod

Table 8 . Presents the analysed responses of respondents on the degree
perceived by the Barangay Tanod.
Table 8 . The degree of seriousness of problems encountered by the Punong
Kalinga ,as perceived by the Barangay Tanod (N-15)
RA
INDICATORS MS MOS LA XW DE NK
11 2 2
1.Lack of funds (33) (4) (2) 2.60 MOS 1
3 9 3
2 11 2
3.Poor participation of constituents (6) (22) (2) 2.00 MOS 3
2 8 5
5. Poor delivery of services/Public 2.13 MOS 2

73
services in promoting of general 4 9 2
welfare of the barangay (12) (18) (2)
6.Lack of maintaining peace and order 3 11 1
of the barangay (9) (22) (1) 2.13 MOS 2

ordinance which are applicable with the 4 8 3
barangay (12) (16) (3) 2.07 MOS

preparing the annual executive and 4 9 2
supplemental budgets of the barangay (12) (18) (2) 2.13 MOS
TAWM 2.11 MOS
As gleaned on the table, the barangay tanod perceived that the degree of
seriousness of problems encountered by the Punong barangay in the
2.11.
“Lack of funds” acquired the highest weighted mean of 2.60 or moderately
serious. Lack of fund was the number one problem as perceived by the barangay
councils which impede the successful implementation of the different programs of
the barangay.
“Lack of maintaining peace and order of the barangay”;
“Lack of coordination with in the barangay development council”; and “preparing
the annual executive and supplemental budgets of the barangay” ranked second
having a weighted mean of 2.13 or moderately serious. This implies that the
people of the barangay are not living harmoniously among themselves that
disturb peace and harmony of the barangay. It also implies that the community
lack coordination that could highly impede the success of the implementation of
the barangay programs. The annual executive and supplemental budgets of the
barangay were not regularly prepared as shown by the table.
perceived by the community
Table 9. Presents the analyzed responses of respondents on the degree
perceived by the community

Table 9. The degree of seriousness of problems encountered by the
Punong barangay in the implementation of their program in the municipality of
Balbalan, Kalinga ,as perceived by the community (N-76)
INDICATORS MS MOS LS XW DE RANK
50 20 6
1.Lack of funds (150) (40) (6) 2.58 MOS 1
30 35 11
20 55 1
3.Poor participation of constituents (60) (110) (1) 2.25 MOS 4
40 20 10
welfare of the barangay (90) (80) (6) 2.32 MOS 3
order of the barangay (135) (42) (10) 2.46 MOS 2

2.58 MOS 1
ordinance which are applicable 50 20 6
with the barangay (150) (40) (6)

20 40 10
preparing the annual executive
(60) (80) (10)
and supplemental budgets of the
barangay 1.97 MOS 6
TAWM 2.33 MOS
As gleaned on the table, the community perceived that the degree of
2.33.
“Lack of funds”; and “Lack of enforcing all laws and ordinance which are
applicable with the barangay” acquired the highest weighted mean of 2.58 or
moderately serious. Lack of fund was the number one problem as perceived by
the barangay councils which impede the successful implementation of the
different programs of the barangay.
The problem “Lack of maintaining peace and order of the barangay”
ranked second having a weighted mean of 2.46 or moderately serious. This

implies that the people of the barangay are not living harmoniously among
themselves that disturb peace and harmony of the barangay which leads to the
unsuccessful implementation of the programs in the barangay.
and the community on the degree of seriousness of problems encountered by the
Balbalan, Kalinga
Table 10. Presents the comparison among the perceptions of the
barangay council, barangay tanod, and the community on the degree of
implementation of their program in the municipality of Balbalan, Kalinga
Barangay Tanod, and the Community on the degree of seriousness of problems
encountered by the Punong barangay in the implementation of their program in
the Municipality of Balbalan, Kalinga

Barangay Barangay
INDICATORS Council Tanod Community XW DE Rank
1.Lack of funds 2.60 2.60 2.58 2.59 MOS 1
2.Lack of trainings
and seminars 2.07 2.00 2.25 2.11 MOS 4.5
3.Poor participation of
constituents 2.07 2.00 2.25 2.11 MOS 4.5
4.Educational
attainment 2.07 1.80 2.24 2.03 MOS 7
5. Poor delivery of
services/Public
services in promoting
of general welfare of
the barangay 2.20 2.13 2.32 2.22 MOS 3
6.Lack of maintaining
peace and order of
the barangay 2.00 2.13 2.46 2.20 MOS 4
7.Lack of enforcing all
laws and ordinance
which are applicable
with the barangay 2.07 2.07 2.58 2.24 MOS 2

8.Lack of coordination
with in the barangay
development council
preparing the annual
executive and
supplemental budgets
of the barangay 1.87 2.13 1.97 1.99 MOS 8
TAWM 2.12 2.11 2.33 2.19 MOS
As gleaned on the table, the three respondent responden ts perceived that the
degree of seriousness of problems encountered by the Punong barangay in the
2.19.
The table further showed that “Lack of Fund” acquired the highest average
weighted mean of 2.59 or moderately serious. This implies that the barangay
cannot successfully implement their programs due to lack of funding.
“Lack of enforcing all laws and ordinance which were applicable with the
barangay” ranked second with an average weighted mean 2.44. This implies
80
that the laws and ordinance in the barangay must be strictly imposed so that not
to impede in the successful implementation of the programs.
‘’Poor delivery of services/Public services in promoting of general welfare of the
barangay’’ third ranked with an average weighted mean of 2.22 This implies that
This implies that the implementers of programs delivers poorly the services in
promoting of general welfare of the barangay.
‘’Educational Attainment’’ lowest ranked with an average weighted mean 2.03
.This implies that the Educational Attainment of the implementers and the
Community not fully influence the success of the implementation of the
programs in the barangay.
‘’Lack of coordination with in the barangay development council preparing the
annual executive and supplemental budgets of the barangay ‘’got the least
weighted mean 1.99 .This implies that the people of the barangay are not living
harmoniously among that disturb peace and harmony of the barangay. The
barangay development council annual executive and supplemental budgets of
the barangay were not regularly prepared.

Table 10. Summary of the Single Factor ANOVA on the level of awareness of
the respondents on the implementation of the Barangay programs in the
SUMMARY
barangay
council 8 16.93333 2.1167 0.0467
barangay
tanod 8 16.86667 2.1083 0.052
Community 8 18.64474 2.3306 0.0414
ANOVA
Source of P-
Variation SS Df MS F value F crit
Between
Groups 0.2539533 2 0.127 2.7204 0.089 3.4668
Within Groups 0.9801807 21 0.0467
Total 1.2341341 23

respondents on the degree of seriousness of problems encountered by the
Balbalan, Kalinga is accepted.
respondents.
Factors affecting the performance of the punong barangay in the implementation
of the barangay program in the Municipality of Balbalan, Kalinga, as perceived by
the Barangay Council
Table 11. Presents the analyzed responses of respondents on the factors
affecting the performance barangays in the implementation of the punong
barangay program in the municipality of Balbalan, Kalinga as perceived by the
Barangay Councils.
83
Table 11. The factors affecting the performance of the Punong barangays in
the implementation of the barangay program in the municipality of Balbalan,
Kalinga ,as perceived by the Barangay councils (N-9)
INDICATORS VMA MA LA XW DE RANK
4 3 2
1.Lack of funds (12) (6) (2) 2.22 MA 4
2.Lack of trainings and 3 6 0
seminars (9) (12) (0) 2.33 MA 3
3.Poor participation of
5(15) 3(6) 1(1)
constituents 2.44 MA 2
9 0 0
4.Educational attainment (27) (0) (0) 3.00 VMA 1
5. Poor delivery of
services/Public services in
3 4 2
promoting of general welfare
(9) (8) (2)
of the barangay 2.11 MA 4
6.Lack of maintaining peace 3 4 2
and order of the barangay (9) (8) (2) 2.11 MA 4
7.Lack of enforcing all laws 2.11 MA 4

84
and ordinance which are 3 4 (2)
applicable with the barangay (9) (8) 2
8.Lack of coordination with in
the barangay development
council preparing the annual
executive and supplemental 2 5 2
budgets of the barangay (6) (10) (2) 2.00 MA 6
TAWM 2.29 MA
As gleaned on the table, the barangay councils perceived that the factors
affecting the performance barangays in the implementation of the barangay
program in the municipality of Balbalan, Kalinga is much affecting based from the
obtained total average weighted mean of 2.29.
“Educational attainment” acquired the highest weighted mean of 3.00 or
very much affecting. This implies that the educational attainment of the
implementers and the community highly influence the success of the
implementation of the programs in the barangay.
“Poor participation of constituents” acquired the second highest mean of
2.44 or moderately affecting. This implies that the constituents of the barangay
seldom participate in the programs being implemented that led to the failure of
the programs of the barangay.

85
“Lack of trainings and seminars” acquired the third highest mean of 2.33
or moderately affecting. This implies that the punong barangays lack proper
trainings and seminars. They must have undergone proper and sufficient
trainings and seminars in order to effectively and efficiently implement the
programs.
“Lack of coordination with in the barangay development council preparing
the annual executive and supplemental budgets of the barangay” got the least
weighted mean of 2.00 or much affecting.
the Barangay Tanod
Table 12. Presents the analysed responses of respondents on the factors
program in the municipality of Balbalan, Kalinga ,as perceived by the Barangay
TANOD
Table 12. The factors affecting the performance barangays in the
implementation of the barangay program in the municipality of Balbalan, Kalinga
,as perceived by the Barangay Tanod (N-15)

86
4 5 6
1.Lack of funds (12) (10) (6) 2.45 MA 4
10 5 0
2.Lack of trainings and seminars (30) (10) (0) 2.18 MA 7
3.Poor participation of 9 4 2
constituents (18) (8) (2) 2.13 MA 8
5 7 3
4.Educational attainment (15) (14) (3) 2.58 MA 2
5. Poor delivery of
services/Public services in
6 5 4
promoting of general welfare of
(18) (10) (4)
the barangay 2.25 MA 6
order of the barangay (15) (10) (5) 2.38 MA 5
ordinance which are applicable 4 5 6
with the barangay (12) (10) (6) 2.51 MA 3
8.Lack of coordination with in
the barangay development 2.71 VMA 1

87
council preparing the annual
executive and supplemental 6 6 3
budgets of the barangay (18) (12) (3)
TAWM 2.40 MA
As gleaned on the table, the barangay Tanod perceived that the factors
“Lack of coordination within the barangay development council preparing
the annual executive and supplemental budgets of the barangay” acquired the
highest weighted mean of 2.71 or much affecting. This implies that barangay
council do not fully coordinate with their colleagues in the preparation of the
annual executive and supplemental budgets of the barangay that led to the
failure of their programs.
“Educational attainment” acquired the second highest mean of 2.58 or
much affecting. This implies that the educational attainment of the punong
barangay significantly affects its performance thus affecting the implementation
of the barangay programs.

“Lack of enforcing all laws and ordinance which applicable with the
barangay” acquired the third highest mean of 2.51 or much affecting. This implies
that laws and ordinances in the barangay are not strictly imposed.
“Lack of trainings and seminars” got the least weighted mean of 2.18 or
much affecting.
the community
Table 13. Presents the analyzed responses of respondents on the factors
affecting the performance of the Punong barangays in the implementation of the
barangay program in the municipality of Balbalan, Kalinga ,as perceived by the
community
Table13. The factors affecting the performance of the punong barangays
in the implementation of the barangay program inthe municipality of Balbalan,
Kalinga as perceived by the Community (N=76)

89
40 30 6
1.Lack of funds (120) (60) (6) 2.45 MA 4
30 30 16
2.Lack of trainings and seminars (90) (60) (16) 2.18 MA 7
40 6 30 8
3.Poor participation of constituents (120) (12) (30) 2.13 MA
5 20 6 2
4.Educational attainment (150) (40) (6) 2.58 MA
welfare of the barangay (90) (70) (11) 2.25 MA 6
order of the barangay (135) (30) (16) 2.38 MA 5
preparing the annual executive and 55 10 21
supplemental budgets of the (165) (20) (21) 2.71 VMA 1

preparing the annual executive and
supplemental budgets of the 55 10 21
barangay (165) (20) (21) 2.71 VMA 1
TAWM 2.40 MA
As gleaned on the table, the community perceived that the factors
“Educational attainment” acquired the highest mean of 2.58 or much
affecting. This implies that the educational attainment of the punong barangay
significantly affects its performance thus affecting the implementation of the
barangay programs.
“Lack of enforcing all laws and ordinance which are applicable with the
barangay” acquired the second highest mean of 2.51 or much affecting. This
implies that laws and ordinances in the barangay are not strictly imposed.
“Lack of funds” got the least weighted mean of 2.18 or much affecting .
91
and the community on the factors affecting the performance of the punong
barangays in the implementation of the barangay program inthe municipality of
Balbalan, Kalinga
Table 14. Presents the comparison among the perceptions perceptions of
the barangay council, Barangay Tanod, and the community on the factors
affecting the performance of the Punong barangays in the implementation of the
barangay program in the municipality of Balbalan, Kalinga
barangay tanod, and the community on the factors affecting the performance of
the punong barangays in the implementation of the barangay program inthe
municipality of Balbalan, Kalinga
Barangay Barangay
INDICATORS Council Tanod Community XW DE RANK
1.Lack of funds 2.22 2.80 2.45 2.49 MA 2
2.Lack of trainings
and seminars 2.33 2.67 2.18 2.39 MA 4

92
3.Poor participation
of constituents 2.44 2.67 2.13 2.41 MA 3
4.Educational
attainment 3.00 2.67 2.58 2.75 VMA 1
5. Poor delivery of
services/Public
services in
promoting of
general welfare of
the barangay 2.11 2.13 2.25 2.16 MA 7
6.Lack of
maintaining peace
and order of the
barangay 2.11 2.47 2.38 2.32 MA 5
7.Lack of enforcing
all laws and
ordinance which
are applicable with
the barangay 2.11 1.47 2.51 2.03 MA 8
8.Lack of
coordination with in 2.00 2.20 2.71 2.30 MA 6

the barangay
development
council preparing
the annual
executive and
supplemental
budgets of the
barangay
TAWM 2.29 2.38 2.40 2.36 MA
As gleaned on the table, the three respondents perceived that the factors
affecting the performance of the punong barangays in the implementation of the
barangay program in the municipality of Balbalan, Kalinga as perceived by the
community is much based from the obtained total average weighted mean of
2.36.
The table further showed that “Educational attainment” acquired the
highest average weighted mean of 2.75 or very much affecting. This implies that
the educational attainment of the punong barangay is significant in implementing
the barangay programs effectively and efficiently.

“Lack of funds” ranked second with an average weighted mean of 2.49.
This implies that the programs of the barangay were not fully funded thus led to
the failure of the implementation of the program.
‘’Poor Participation of constituents’’ ranked third with an average weighted
mean of 2.4. This implies that the programs of the barangay poorly participation
to the community.
‘’Poor delivery of services /Public services in promoting of general welfare of the
barangay the lowest ranked with an average weighted mean of 2.16. This implies
that the services poorly of knowledge and skills to performed responsibilities in
promoting of general welfare of the barangay
‘’ .Lack of enforcing all laws and ordinance which are applicable with the
barangay an average weighted mean of 2.03 .This implies that the barangay
ordinance or laws are not strictly imposed.
Based on the table , the comparison of perceptions of the three groups of
Respondents on the Factors affecting the performance of the Punong
Barangays in the implementation of the barangay programs got a varying
degrees. Of the three groups of Respondents ,Barangay Council, Barangay
Tanod, and Community ,answered much action.

95
Table 15.Summary of the Single Factor ANOVA on the level of awareness of the
respondents on the implementation of the Barangay programs in the Municipality
of Balbalan, Kalinga
SUMMARY
barangay
council 8 18.333333 2.2917 0.1020723
barangay
tanod 8 19.066667 2.3833 0.1939683
community 8 19.197368 2.3997 0.0407072
ANOVA
Source of
Variation SS DF MS F P-value F crit
Between
Groups 0.0542 2 0.0271 0.2415415 0.787568 3.4668
Within Groups 2.3572 21 0.1122
Total 2.4115 23

respondents on the the factors affecting the performance of the punong
barangays in the implementation of the barangay program in the municipality of
Balbalan, Kalinga is accepted.
respondents.
CHAPTER 5
SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This chapter presents the summary of findings, conclusions and
recommendations suggested to improve the performance of the punong
barangay in the municipality of Balbalan, Kalinga.
This study looked into the performance of the punong barangays in the
municipality of Balbalan, Kalinga for the year 2018.
Specifically, the level of competencies of the Punong Barangays in the
Kalinga; the degree of seriousness of problems encountered by the Punong
Kalinga; and the factors affecting the performance of the punong barangays in
the implementation of the barangay program inthe municipality of Balbalan,
Kalinga.
The null hypotheses tested in this study were:
1. The level of competencies of the Punong Barangays in the implementation of
the Barangay programs in the Municipality of Balbalan, Kalinga is moderately
competent.
1.1. There is no significant difference among the perceptions of the
respondents on the level of competencies of the Punong Barangays in

the implementation of the Barangay programs in the Municipality of
Balbalan, Kalinga.
2. The degree of seriousness of problems encountered by the Punong barangay
in the implementation of their program in the municipality of Balbalan, Kalinga
is moderately serious.
2.1. There is no significant difference on the perception of the respondents
among the respondents on the degree of seriousness of problems
encountered by the Punong barangay in the implementation of their
program in the municipality of Balbalan, Kalinga.
3. The factors affecting the performance of the punong barangay in the
moderately serious.
3.1. There is no significant difference among the perceptions of the
respondents on the factors affecting the performance of the punong
barangay in the implementation of their program in the municipality of
Balbalan, Kalinga.
A total of 100 respondents were involved in the study, 9 Barangay
Council, 15 barangay tanods, and 76 from the community.

The study made use of the descriptive method. A questionnaire was used
as the main instrument in gathering the needed data.
Weighted mean was used to determine the level of awareness of the
respondents on the level of competencies of the Punong Barangays in the
Kalinga; the degree of seriousness of problems encountered by the Punong
Kalinga; and the factors affecting the performance of the punong barangays in
the implementation of the barangay program inthe municipality of Balbalan,
Kalinga.
To determine the significant difference among the perceptions of the three
groups of respondents, the single factor ANNOVA with significance at .05 alpha
level was used.
FINDINGS
The following were the significant findings:
Profile of the Respondents
Age. Respondents having ages from 31-40 years old had dominated the group.
Gender. The female group dominated the male respondents.

100
Civil Status. The study found the majority of the respondents are married.
Length of Service. The study found that majority from the respondents is on their
7-8 years in service.
Educational Attainment. The college graduate group had dominated all the other
respondents.
Trainings/Seminars attended. Majority from the respondents are had attended
Barangay development Program formulation trainings/seminars.
Barangay programs in the Municipality of Balbalan, Kalinga
a. The barangay councils perceived that the level of competencies of the
Punong Barangays in the implementation of the Barangay programs in the
Municipality of Balbalan, Kalinga is moderately competent based from the
b. The barangay tanod perceived that level of competencies of the Punong
Barangays in the implementation of the Barangay programs in the
obtained total average weighted mean of 2.31

101
c. The community perceived that level of competencies of the Punong
Barangays in the implementation of the Barangay programs in the
d. The null hypothesis is accepted.
implementation of their program in the Municipality of Balbalan, Kalinga
a. The barangay councils perceived that the degree of seriousness of problems
encountered by the Punong barangay in the implementation of their program
in the municipality of Balbalan, Kalinga is moderately serious based from the
b. the barangay tanod perceived that the degree of seriousness of problems
c. The community perceived that the degree of seriousness of problems

of the barangay program in the Municipality of Balbalan, Kalinga
a. The barangay councils perceived that the factors affecting the performance
barangays in the implementation of the barangay program in the municipality
of Balbalan, Kalinga is much affecting based from the obtained total average
weighted mean of 2.29.
b. The barangay tanods perceived that the factors affecting the performance
c. The community perceived that the factors affecting the performance

103

104
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the foregoing findings, the following conclusions were drawn:
1. There is no significant difference among the perceptions of the respondents
on the level of competencies of the Punong Barangays in the implementation
of the Barangay programs in the Municipality of Balbalan, Kalinga.
2. There is no significant difference on the perception of the respondents among
the respondents on the degree of seriousness of problems encountered by
the Punong barangay in the implementation of their program in the
municipality of Balbalan, Kalinga.
3. There is no significant difference among the perceptions of the respondents
on the factors affecting the performance of the punong barangay in the
implementation of their program in the municipality of Balbalan, Kalinga.

RECOMMENDATIONS
The following recommendations are offered to effectively improve the
performance of the punong barangay and the implementation o f the barangay
programs.
1. They should do their duties and responsibilities as a barangay officials in
their community and implements more programs to improve the
barangay
2. As the Economic Development the barangay should add Income
Generating Projects in order to sufficiently fund all their programs.
3. The community shall consider the Educational background of the person
they will elect as the Punong barangay.
4. The barangay Council, Barangay Tanod and the Community should
observe the coordination of the programs implemented.
5. The barangay council shall add ordinances subject to the current
problems and/or needs of the barangay.
6. Regular meeting shall be conducted. If need be, they shall call for special
meetings with the initiative of the barangay Captain. Through that,
coordination will be developed among the Barangay Council

REFERENCES
Marx, David B. (2007)
Effect of gender , education and age upon leaders use of influence tactics and
full range leadership behaviors.
http://www academia.edu/315275/ educational attainment
Pielago (2015)
Et. Al – factors affecting the job performance of the Sangguniang Bayan
Members.
Mogpog Marinduque
Educational attainment profile and performance of punong barangays that
implication to good governance
http:// www chanrobles.com/localgov hm.
Menguin (2016)
Educate Barangay Leaders.
Rey, Joel P. (2003)
The profile, factors and effect on the performances

LETTER TO THE BARANGAY CAPTAIN
01 April 2019
Hon. BADING BARCELON

Punong Barangay
Barangay Mabaca, Balbalan Kalinga
SIR:
The undersigned are students of the Bachelor of Public Administration this

2nd Semester, 2018-2019. Part of our curriculum is to undergo a research, thus,
we embarked on a research entitled, “The Punong Barangay Profile and
Performance: Its Impact on the Development of the Barangays In the Municipality
of Balbalan, Kalinga”. With this, may we ask permission to conduct our said
research in your area of responsibility. Rest assured the data you will provide will
be used academically only.
Thank you and looking forward to your positive response..
Truly yours,
YESAMINE M. DAO-WAN
KIMBERLY S.GONAYON
MICHEAL A. LAWAGAN
PRITCHIE A. OPAL
Researchers
Approved:
GRACE ESMERALDA L. LOPEZ, MPA JUAN MOSHE M. DUYAN, MPBM

Thesis Adviser Program Chairperson
JOHN JOHN C. VENUS, MPA

OIC Dean, CPAIG
LETTER OF THE RESPONDENTS

01 April 201
Dear Respondent,
We are students of the Kalinga State University taking up Bachelor of Public

Administration this 2nd Semester, 2018-2019. As part of our curriculum, we are
required to undergo a research, thus, we embarked on a research entitled, “The
Punong Barangay Profile and Performance. It’s on the Development of the
Barangays in the Municipality of Balbalan, Kalinga with this, may we solicit your
help by answering our survey questionnaire as honestly as you can. Rest
assured your answers will be used academically only.
Thank you.
Truly yours,
YESAMIN M. DAOWAN
KIMBERLY S. GONAYON
MICHAEL A. LAWAGAN
PRITCHIE A. OPAL
Researchers
Approved:
GRACE ESMERALDA L. LOPEZ, MPA JUAN MOSHE M. DUYAN

Thesis Adviser Program Chairperson
JOHN JOHN C. VENUS, MPA

OIC Dean
Survey Questionnaire
Name: (Optional) ___________________________
Part I. PERSONAL INFORMATION
1. Age
21-30 ( )
31-40 ( )
41-50 ( )
51 above ( )
2. Sex
Male ( )
Female ( )
3. Civil Status
Single ( )
Married ( )
Widow ( )
4. Length of Service
1-3years ( )
4-6years ( )
7-8years ( )
9years above ( )
5. Educational Attainment
Elementary Graduates ( )
High School Level ( )
High School Graduates ( )
College Level ( )
College Graduates ( )
6. Training Seminar Attended Related to Punong Barangay Functions and
Responsibilities
1. Local Government ( )
2. Legislative Orientation of Punong Barangay ( )
3. Barangay Development Program Formulation ( )
4. Strengthening of Barangay Anti-drug abuse council ( )
5. Disaster Risk Reduction and Management ( )
6. Others. Please specify:
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
Part II. Level of competencies of the Punong Barangays
On the implementation of the barangay programs in the
Municipality of Balbalan, Kalinga.
Note: Please put a check (√ ) on the box that check describe your
answer.
I. To determine the level of competencies of the Punong Barangay
on the implementation of the barangays programs.
Legend:
Numerical Scale Descriptive Scale Symbol
3 Very Much Competent VMC
2 Moderately Competent MOC
1 Less Competent LC
INDICATORS MC MOC LC
3 2 1
1.Barangay Legislation
a. Formulated sangguniang Internal Rules of
Procedure
b. Implemented sangguniang Barangay Internal Rules
of Procedure
c. Conduct of Regular Sessions
d. Enactment of General/ Regulatory Ordinance in the
preceding year
e. Adoption of resolution
2. Transparency
a. Posted annual Summary of Income and
expenditures the preceding year in conspicuous
place
b. Posted barangay Ordinance and resolution of
preceding year in at least three conspicuous place
3. Citizens Participation
a. Conduct of barangay assembly
4.Development Planning
a. Conduct of barangay development council meetings

at least once every six months
b. Implementation of barangay development plan
c. Formulation of Annual Investment Program of the
preceding year
5.Revenue Generation
a. Enacted barangay tax ordinance with public hearing
b. Conducted barangay fund raising activity
c. General income from barangay economic
enterprises
d. Updated the barangay revenue code
e. Implemented financial management system
following Commission on Audit (COA) standards
6.Facilities and Customer Service
a. Presence of barangay hall with the following
administrative requirements
 Barangay seal display
 Philippines flag in the barangay hall premises
 Picture of incumbent president displayed in
the office
 Organizational chart displayed in the
barangay hall
b. Presence of functional properties and equipment in
the barangay hall as support to the operation of the
barangay
 Office equipment such as typewriter/
computer
 Communication facilities (internet
connection, telephone and fax machine
 Transportation facilities (Patrol vehicle/
service vehicle/ ambulance
 Emergency equipment such as generators
c. Established barangay public information desk
d. Implemented the Citizens charter
 Posted in conspicuous places
 Printed the citizens charter
Social Services
a. Presence of the following health and nutrition program
implementers
 Barangay Nutrition Scholar
 Barangay Health Workers
b. Presence of health nutrition facilities
 Botikang Bayan
115
 Public Comfort Room
 Communal Garden
 Barangay Health Station
c. Advocate on Health and Nutrition Programs
 Operation Timbang
 Oplan Food Supplementation
 4s dengue prevention
 Senior Citizen Program
2. Education, Culture and Sports
a. Established Education / Information Facilities
 Daycare Center
 Information, Learning and Reading Center
b. Conduct of cultural and sport activities
1.Agriculture and Fisheries Development
a. Presence of barangay Agriculture service
 Tresher and other post-harvest equipment
 Multi-purpose pavement
 Planting material distribution system
 Farm product collection and buying station
116
a. Implementation of clean and green activates
 Conduct of clean and green activates
2.Waste Management and pollution control
 Enact ordinance / resolution on Solid Waste
Management System
 Presence of material recovery facility in the
barangay
 Maintained of sewage/ drainage canal
II. Degree of seriousness of problems encountered by the Punong
Barangay in the implementation of their programs.
Legend:
3 Much Serious MS
2 Moderately Serious MOS
1 Less Serious LS
Indicators MS MOS LS
3 2 1
1.Lack of fund / availability of fund
2.Lack of trainings and seminars
3.Poor participation of constituents
4.Educational attainment
5.Poor delivery of services /public services in promoting of
general welfare of the barangay
6.Lack of maintaining peace and order of the barangay
7.Lack of enforcing all laws and ordinances which are
applicable with in the barangay
8.Lack of coordination with in the barangay development canal
preparing the annual executive and supplemental budgets of
the barangay
III. Factors affecting the performance of the Punong Barangays is the
implementation of the barangay programs

118
Legend:
3 Very Much Action VMA
2 Much Action MA
1 Less Action LA
Indicators VMA MA LA
3 2 1
1.Lack of fund / availability of fund
2.Lack of trainings and seminars
3.Poor participation of constituents
4.Educational attainment
5.Poor delivery of services /public services in promoting of
general welfare of the barangay
6.Lack of maintaining peace and order of the barangay
7.Lack of enforcing all laws and ordinances which are
applicable with in the barangay
8.Lack of coordination with in the barangay development
canal preparing the annual executive and supplemental
budgets of the barangay

CURRICULUM VITAE
NAME : YESAMIN M. DAO-WAN
BIRTHDATE : OCTOBER 24,1998
BIRTHPLACE : CASIGAYAN TABUK CITY
RELIGIOUS : ROMAN CATHOLIC
PARENTS
FATHER : DANILO L. DAO-WAN
MOTHER : CECILY M. DAO-WAN
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND:
ELEMENTARY : TABUK CENTRAL SCHOOL
HIGHSCHOOL : SAINT THERESITA’S SCHOOL
COLLEGE : KALINGA STATE UNIVERSITY

CURRICULUM VITAE
NAME : KIMBERLY S. GONAYON
BIRTHDATE : MARCH 21,1998
BIRTHPLACE : MABACA BALBALAN KALINGA
PARENTS
FATHER : EFREN B. GONAYON
MOTHER : MARYJANE S. GONAYON
ELEMENTARY : MABACA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
HIGHSCHOOL : AGBANNAWAG NATIONAL SCHOOL

121
CURRICULUM VITAE
NAME : MICHAEL A. LAWAGAN
BIRTHDATE : DECEMBER 21, 1988
BIRTHPLACE : MABACA BALBALAN KALINGA
PARENTS
FATHER : FERNANDO LAWAGAN
MOTHER : EMIRITA LAWAGAN
ELEMENTARY : MABACA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
HIGHSCHOOL : WESTERN KALINGA SCHOOL
COLLEGE : KALINGA STATEUNIVERSITY

CURRICULUM VITAE
NAME : PRITCHIE A. OPAL
BIRTHDATE : SEPTEMBER 19,1998
BIRTHPLACE : MALLONG, CUDAL, TABUK CITY
PARENTS
FATHER : URBANO OPAL
MOTHER : ELIZABETH OPAL
ELEMENTARY : CUDAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
HIGHSCHOOL : TABUK NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL

... Editing Kim CONTINUE

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

... Editing Kim CONTINUE

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

... Editing Kim CONTINUE

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

KALINGA STATE UNIVERSITY 1

College of Public Administration and Indigenous Governance 1

Keywords: Punong Barangay, Profile, Performance, Development,

Barangay, Development of Barangay

Punong Barangay also known as a barangay chairman, is the highest

elected official in a barangay ,the smallest level of administrative divisions of the

“islands for good practices to an archipelago of good governance through the

Barangay, type of early Filipino settlement, the word is derived

established by his family. Barangay villages sometimes grew to include 30 to 100

of the Philippines in the 16th century, since resistance remained uncoordinated

administration in the islands.

Barangay is the smallest unit of Local Government Unit. The barangay

86 has contributed considerably in awakening the interest of our people and

broadening their participation in Government affairs, the conduct of their official

crystallized and considered and where disputed may be amicably settled.

Public administration belongs to Government officials or Public Leader.

aware on how to passed laws, approve programs, promulgate policies and

their duties and responsibilities regardless of their profile

Arris and Timminis (1989) as mention by Osinsao (2014) indicated the

the less likely people would like better performance

to environment. It implies that a person upon education, will adjust or at least

capable of trying to adjust to the environment, education brings about a change

in the behavior of a person to environment. This concept applies equally well

Similarly to idea of Ajinkya Taranekar (2016) in the debate site that

unfortunately, there is no such degree bestowed for exhibiting these qualities”.

But in contrary, in the study of Mascarenes(2016) as cited by Acharya(2010)

low level of education.

eighteen months will be automatically disqualified.

that in each Barangay, there shall be a Punong barangay ,seven (7)

Sangguniang barangay members, the Sangguniang Kabataan chairman, a

barangay secretary, and a barangay treasurer. There shall also be in every

barangay a Lupong Tagapamayapa. The Punong Barangay is the Executive

government but also in the Local Government Unit.

Moreover, according to section 388 of Local Government Code of 1991, Person

Sangguniang barangay members, and members of the Lupong Tagapamayapa

in each barangay shall be deemed as persons in authority in their jurisdictions,

security of life and property, or the maintenance of a desirable and balanced

authority, shall be deemed agents of persons in authority.

Performance, according to Acosta And associates (1991) as cited by Cadorna

and Velasco (2008), is equated with the local government response to

from rational decision-making, optimal use of resources such as funds,

personnel, equipment and the delivery of basic public services in a timely as

In addition to this, they mentioned that local government performance is

measurable trough discernible improvement in the quality of life of individuals,

performance be assessed in terms of local government capability. They stressed

government’s responses to the community’s needs, particularly the provision of

decision-making, optimal use of resources such as funds, personnel, equipment

and the delivery of basic public service in timely a sustained manner.

Performance can be assessed in terms of the local government’s capabilities to

government performance is then measurable through discernible improvement in

SEC. 389. Chief Executive: Powers, Duties, and Functions. – Punong

(a)The punong barangay, as the chief executive of the barangay

functions, as provided by this Code and other laws.

(b) For efficient, effective and economical governance, the purpose of

barangay, upon authorization of the sangguniang barangay;

the city or municipal mayor and the sanggunian members in the

performance of their duties and functions;

the barangay assembly, and vote only to break a tie;