Medication Safety During Pregnancy: Improving Evidence-Based Practice
Medication Safety During Pregnancy: Improving Evidence-Based Practice
Medication Safety During Pregnancy: Improving Evidence-Based Practice
org
Review
Nearly 90% of women in the United States have taken medications during pregnancy. Medication exposures during pregnancy can result in adverse
pregnancy and neonatal outcomes including birth defects, fetal loss, intrauterine growth restriction, prematurity, and longer-term neurodevel-
opmental outcomes. Advising pregnant women about the safety of medication use during pregnancy is complicated by a lack of data necessary
to engage the woman in an informed discussion. Routinely, health care providers turn to the package insert, yet this information can be incom-
plete and can be based entirely on animal studies. Often, adequate safety data are not available. In a busy clinical setting, health care providers
need to be able to quickly locate the most up-to-date information in order to counsel pregnant women concerned about medication exposure.
Deciding where to locate the best available information is difficult, particularly when the needed information does not exist. Pregnancy registries
are initiated to obtain more data about the safety of specific medication exposures during pregnancy; however, these studies are slow to produce
meaningful information, and when they do, the information may not be readily available in a published form. Health care providers have valuable
data in their everyday practice that can expand the knowledge base about medication safety during pregnancy. This review aims to discuss the
limitations of the package insert regarding medication safety during pregnancy, highlight additional resources available to health care providers to
inform practice, and communicate the importance of pregnancy registries for expanding knowledge about medication safety during pregnancy.
J Midwifery Womens Health 2016;61:52–67 c 2016 by the American College of Nurse-Midwives.
Keywords: pregnancy, fetus, drug effects, prescription drugs, teratogenesis, patient safety, evidence-based health care
52 1526-9523/09/$36.00 doi:10.1111/jmwh.12358
c 2016 by the American College of Nurse-Midwives
✦ Information about the safety of medications during pregnancy is limited, and reliance on the package insert alone is
inadequate.
✦ In a busy clinical setting, health care providers need quick access to high-quality, reliable information about medication
safety during pregnancy.
✦ Health care providers can contribute client data to pregnancy registries to help build the collective information about
medication safety in pregnancy that is needed.
from oral contraceptives, amoxicillin (Amoxil), progesterone, more a legal document on behalf of the manufacturer rather
albuterol (Proventil), promethazine (Phenergan), and estro- than a useful clinical tool. Although the prescribing informa-
genic compounds.16 The most commonly used over-the-coun tion is updated regularly, it generally does not contain all of
ter medication components reported were acetaminophen the information available about the safety of the product, nor
(Tylenol), ibuprofen (Advil), docusate (Dulcolax), pseu- does it routinely include results of studies found in the peer-
doephedrine (Sudafed), aspirin, and naproxen (Aleve). reviewed scientific literature.
Included in this survey was an expert review panel that evalu-
ated safety data for the 54 most commonly used medications.
Food and Drug Administration Pregnancy Categories
Only 2 were determined to have sufficient evidence to assess
teratogenic risk.16 Within the package insert, is the assigned FDA Pregnancy
Category for each medication. Health care providers routinely
rely upon these categories as a simple, convenient measure
The Drug Development Process
of medication risk during pregnancy; however, the categori-
The vast majority of newly approved medications lack ade- cal designations are not as evidence-based or clearly defined
quate human pregnancy data to determine teratogenic risk. as one would hope. For example, one of 5 FDA pregnancy
In a study of 172 new medications approved by the Food and categories (A, B, C, D, and X) are assigned by the manufac-
Drug Administration (FDA) from 2000 to 2010, Adam et al17 turer and approved by the FDA at the time of drug approval
estimated that the teratogenic risk in human pregnancy was (Table 1).21 The alphabetical order of those categories sug-
undetermined for 168 (97.7%) of the new medications. For gest that medication safety during pregnancy is progressively
126 (73.3%) of the new medications, no data were available worse from A to X; however, a careful review of the defi-
regarding safety in pregnancy. nitions reveals that this assumption is incorrect. Categories
Pregnant women are typically excluded from clinical trials C, D, and X are structured differently from A and B; these
for new drug development. Therefore, most medications com- categories weigh risk against benefit and the quantity and
monly used in pregnancy are lacking sufficient data to char- quality of the relevant data and are not progressively riskier
acterize human fetal risk,16,18 which can explain in part why (Table 1).21,22 FDA Category X designation does not neces-
so few new medications designed specifically to treat preg- sarily mean the drug is a known teratogen; rather it increases
nancy complications have been developed or approved.18 In- the weight of the risk in the balance of risk relative to the ben-
frequent reports of pregnancies that inadvertently occurred efit. Another limitation of this system is that the pregnancy
during clinical trials provide some information but are usually categories do not always distinguish between risks based on
too few in number to draw conclusions.19 Biopharmaceutical human data versus risks based on animal data or between dif-
companies and regulators rely largely on animal studies, with ferences in frequency, severity, type of developmental toxici-
extrapolation to humans, when developing the drug’s package ties, and risks that are limited to specific gestational windows
insert. More data in the form of human pregnancy exposures of exposure. Reliance on the pregnancy categories can result
and outcomes are needed to characterize risks and benefits. in poorly informed clinical decision making and could lead
Pregnancy registries and similar noninterventional, observa- to unnecessary induced abortion for potential embryonic or
tional studies are among the tools available to collect more fetal harm based on fear of developmental abnormalities that
data about medication safety during pregnancy. are not likely to be present.23–25
In 2014, a new regulation was approved in the United
Package Insert States that eliminates the 5 FDA pregnancy categories.26 The
intent of the new rule is to establish a consistent format for
In a busy clinical setting, health care providers need to have providing information about the effects of a drug in preg-
quick access to high-quality, reliable information about nancy and lactation and to make the content more compre-
medication safety during pregnancy, and many rely upon the hensive, current, and useful for decision making by women
Physician’s Desk Reference, which houses the package insert and their health care providers.26 Implementation of this
(also referred to as the product prescribing information) regulation was scheduled to begin in June of 2015. Newly
provided by the manufacturer.20 In the United States, every submitted products will require the new label format upon
prescription medication is required to have FDA-approved submission, and the new format will be phased in over a 5-year
prescribing information, which in the current form is much period for all pending submissions and for existing products
Source: U.S. DHHS. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Code of Federal Regulations, 21CRF201.57.21
previously approved after June 30, 2001.26 The FDA has issued scription is required to access this service. For more informa-
draft guidance for industry, which provides additional details tion, visit http://depts.washington.edu/terisweb/teris/.
about what is expected in the new label; this document is open Treating for Two: Safer Medication Use in Pregnancy
for public comment.27 Initiative31 is an initiative developed by the Centers for Dis-
ease Control and Prevention in partnership with the FDA
and others to improve the quality and availability of infor-
mation that can be used to inform clinical decision mak-
PREGNANCY MEDICATION INFORMATION FROM ing for pregnant women, women who could become preg-
ORGANIZATIONS AND DATABASES nant, and health care providers. Treating for Two focuses
To improve access to safety information, other organizations on expanding research about medication safety during preg-
have compiled and summarized available data, including nancy; evaluating evidence through an expert review process
results from pregnancy registries, to serve as a centralized to compare available treatment options for common health
portal for specific medication safety information. Examples conditions and to identify the safer option(s) for disease
of sites where providers can quickly find information about management during pregnancy; and educating women and
a particular medication exposure during pregnancy are health care providers with expert summaries of medication
MotherToBaby,28 REPROTOX,29 TERIS,30 and Treating For safety and disease management. For more information, visit
Two.31 http://www.cdc.gov/pregnancy/meds/treatingfortwo/.31
MotherToBaby,28 a service of the nonprofit Organiza- In the United States and Canada, teratology information
tion of Teratology Information Specialists, provides evidence- is provided to health care providers and the general pub-
based information to women, health care providers, and the lic through a network of professional organizations that are
general public about medications and other exposures during part of the Organization of Teratology Information Specialists
pregnancy and breastfeeding. MotherToBaby provides online (OTIS).28 In Europe, several organizations that provide ter-
fact sheets, available in English and Spanish, for individual atogen information services comprise the membership of the
medications and other exposures. In addition, MotherToBaby European Network of Teratology Information Services.33 The
has a toll-free number (866-626-6847), which can be called for primary mission of these organizations is to provide counsel-
expert consultation. Services are free of charge. For more in- ing regarding the safety of a medication or other agent dur-
formation, visit www.mothertobaby.org. ing pregnancy to women and heath care providers. In addition
REPROTOX29 is an online information system contain- to providing this service, these organizations have attempted
ing summaries on the effects of medications, chemicals, in- to expand available evidence by also conducting pregnancy
fections, and physical agents on pregnancy, reproduction, and registries.
development. The REPROTOX system was developed as a re-
source for clinicians, scientists, and government agencies. RE-
PREGNANCY REGISTRIES
PROTOX requires an annual subscription. For more informa-
tion, visit www.reprotox.org. In contrast to the package insert and its reliance on preap-
TERIS is an online database of summaries of agents and is proval studies, pregnancy registries are observational studies
used by health care providers to evaluate the risks of possible that accrue postmarketing data about the safety of specific
teratogenic exposures in pregnant women. TERIS agent sum- medications or conditions during pregnancy. Pregnancy reg-
maries contain a thorough review of published clinical and istries are designed to assess the safety of human pregnancy
experimental literature and includes a risk assessment devel- exposures for specific approved medications and vaccines,34
oped by an advisory board comprised of nationally recognized and often the impact of disease on pregnancy and pregnancy
authorities in clinical teratology. The database is searched by outcomes is evaluated.
using either generic names or domestic or foreign proprietary Pregnancy registries are not analogous with disease reg-
names. An updated, automated version of Shepard’s Catalog istries and other types of registries designed for surveil-
of Teratogenic Agents 32 is distributed with TERIS. A sub- lance purposes (eg, cancer registries). Pregnancy registries are
National Examine risks associated Pregnant women with a 1-page questionnaire Enrolled ⬎ 2200 transplant
Transplantation with numerous and history of solid organ about posttransplant recipients (3300 pregnancies)
Pregnancy evolving medical transplantation or pregnancies, since 1991.
Registry37,38 products and whose pregnancy is completed by Includes male exposures.
Disease registry procedures related to fathered by male transplant Contributed to identification of
University-based transplantation transplant recipients coordinator, HCP, or the association between
transplant recipient mycophenolate mofetil
(CellCept) and increased
incidences of spontaneous
abortions and congenital
malformations, resulted in
change from Pregnancy
Category C to D in 2007.
North American Determine frequency of Pregnant women with or 3 brief telephone More than 9,300 women have
Antiepileptic Drug major malformations without AED interviews with been enrolled since this
(AED) Pregnancy in infants exposed to exposure during woman at enrollment, registry was initiated in 1997.
39 AED drugs during pregnancy 7 months’ gestation,
Registry Includes both internal and
Multiple product pregnancy and 8 to 12 weeks external control groups; an
registry after expected date of internal, unexposed control
University-based birth group is a major strength and
Cosponsored by several infrequently seen in
AED manufacturers industry-sponsored registries.
2125 women enrolled since
1999.
OTIS Autoimmune Monitor planned and Pregnant women with Maternal telephone Found no significant difference
Diseases in Pregnancy unplanned RA, psoriasis, interviews: 3 during in major defects and no
Study40,41 pregnancies exposed psoriatic arthritis, pregnancy; at pattern of minor defects
Multiple product to certain Crohn’s disease, outcome; 1 year infant among 64 women with RA
registry medications, to ankylosing follow-up exposed to leflunomide
University- and evaluate the possible spondylitis, and Outcome confirmed by (Arava) during pregnancy
teratogen information teratogenic effect, and multiple sclerosis medical records; compared to 108 unexposed
services-based to follow live-born with or without includes specialized, women with RA and 78
neanates for one year medication exposure blinded infant physical unexposed women without
after birth for these indications examination by RA.
dysmorphologists/ Although based on small
geneticists for major numbers, provides first
and minor defects
(Continued)
Ribavirin Pregnancy Monitor pregnancy Pregnant women with 5 data collection time Enrolled 263 pregnancies since
Registry24,25 exposures to ribavirin ribavirin exposure points: early 2004.
Multiple product and evaluate the during pregnancy or pregnancy; Category X product.
registry potential human 6-month period midpregnancy; end of Includes male exposures.
Industry-based teratogenicity of before pregnancy; or pregnancy; infant 6 Long exposure window (6
Cosponsored by all 7 prenatal exposure if similarly exposed and 12 months, from months prior to conception)
manufacturers of through male sexual prescriber, maternity due to the long half-life of
ribavirin in the United partner taking HCP, pediatric HCP ribavirin (Copegus, Rebetol)
States ribavirin Uses population-based data as
control group.
Abbreviations: AED, antiepileptic drug; ARV, antiretroviral; HCP, health care provider; RA, rheumatoid arthritis.
Antiretroviral Pregnancy Registry, which has been operating cific information on the timing and dose of drug exposures
since 1989, uploads their interim report36 twice yearly provid- from pregnancy registries to improve the estimation of risk
ing the most up-to-date results from the registry to health care for developmental toxicity, thereby increasing the usefulness
providers. Most registries publish their data in the scientific of the data in assessing outcomes such as growth alteration,
literature and many publish interim findings, although unfor- structural anomalies, functional/neurobehavioral deficits, or
tunately some wait until the study has ended, which decreases death.
the clinical usefulness of the data.
Commonly, registries conducted by organizations pro- CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
viding teratogen information services obtain enrollees from
individuals who call the organization seeking counseling re- A health care provider may make a connection between a
garding the safety of a medication or other agent to which the number of women with a specific problem and their com-
woman has already been exposed or might be exposed. For se- mon prenatal medication exposure. For example, Herbst48
lected target exposures, exposed and unexposed comparison first noted the link between in utero exposure to diethyl-
women are enrolled in a registry; the unexposed women form stilbestrol (DES) and clear cell adenocarcinoma in females.
the internal control group. The OTIS Autoimmune Diseases Due in part to Herbst’s observations, DES was withdrawn
in Pregnancy Study40,41 is an example of a registry based in an from the market, and health care providers and women are
organization whose primary function is to deliver teratogen now well aware of this association. An individual health care
information services (Table 2). provider may never encounter a phenomenon such as was
Pregnancy registries are often slow to enroll, and results seen by Herbst,48 particularly if the exposures are rare, the
may not be available for years after the product enters the mar- strength of the exposure-disease relationship is weak, or the
ket. The pace of enrollment may be related to a low prevalence outcome is less striking. However, all health care providers
of eligible women (rare exposures during pregnancy) or may are given the opportunity to study these issues prospectively
reflect a lack of awareness about the registry, including meth- by participating in pregnancy registries. This research activ-
ods for reporting, or both. This lack of information inhibits ity is not limited to the midwife, nurse practitioner, pedia-
the ability of the health care provider to provide evidence- trician, obstetrician-gynecologist, oncologist, or pathologist;
based care to pregnant women. every pregnant woman and health care provider possesses po-
There is much room for improvement in the conduct of tentially valuable data needed by pregnancy registries.
pregnancy registries. In 2009, the OTIS Research Commit- There are several actions that may be taken by health
tee published a position article calling for better data from care providers to address the overall lack of information
pregnancy registries.47 The committee called for more spe- about medication safety during pregnancy. Keeping the
(Continued)
(Continued)
(Continued)
(Continued)
(Continued)
62 Volume 61, No. 1, January/February 2016
Table 3. Pregnancy Exposure Registries from Internet Searches and the List of Pregnancy Exposure Registries on the FDA Web Site43
Medicine
or Disease
Drug System Medical Condition Registry Focus Registry Contact Information
Psychiatric Psychiatric conditions Paliperidone (Invega) National Pregnancy Registry for Atypical Antipsychotics
Center for Women’s Mental Health, Mass. General Hospital
Phone: 866-961-2388
E-mail: registry@womensmentalhealth.org
Web site: www.womensmentalhealth.org/clinical-and-research-
programs/pregnancyregistry
Psychiatric Psychiatric conditions Lurasidone (Latuda) National Pregnancy Registry for Atypical Antipsychotics
Center for Women’s Mental Health, Mass. General Hospital
Phone: 866-961-2388
E-mail: registry@womensmentalhealth.org
Web site: www.womensmentalhealth.org/clinical-and-research-
programs/pregnancyregistry
Psychiatric Psychiatric conditions Risperidone (Risperdal) National Pregnancy Registry for Atypical Antipsychotics
Center for Women’s Mental Health, Mass. General Hospital
Phone: 866-961-2388
E-mail: registry@womensmentalhealth.org
Web site: www.womensmentalhealth.org/clinical-and-research-
programs/pregnancyregistry
Psychiatric Psychiatric conditions Asenapine (Saphris) National Pregnancy Registry for Atypical Antipsychotics
Center for Women’s Mental Health, Mass. General Hospital
Phone: 866-961-2388
E-mail: registry@womensmentalhealth.org
Web site: www.womensmentalhealth.org/clinical-and-research-
programs/pregnancyregistry
Psychiatric Psychiatric conditions Quetiapine (Seroquel) National Pregnancy Registry for Atypical Antipsychotics
Center for Women’s Mental Health, Mass. General Hospital
Phone: 866-961-2388
E-mail: registry@womensmentalhealth.org
Web site: www.womensmentalhealth.org/clinical-and-research-
programs/pregnancyregistry
Psychiatric Psychiatric conditions OLanzapine (Zyprexa) National Pregnancy Registry for Atypical Antipsychotics
Center for Women’s Mental Health, Mass. General Hospital
Phone: 866-961-2388
E-mail: registry@womensmentalhealth.org
Web site: www.womensmentalhealth.org/clinical-and-research-
programs/pregnancyregistry
Respiratory Asthma Long-acting beta agonist MotherToBaby Pregnancy Studies conducted by OTIS
and short-acting beta Phone: 877-311-8972
agonist products Web site:
http://www.pregnancystudies.org/ongoing-pregnancy-
studies/asthma-study/asthma-treatments-pregnancy/
(Continued)
(Continued)
Abbreviations: GAA, acid alpha-glucosidase; ITP, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura; MPSI, mucopolysaccharidosis type I; MPS VI, mucopolysaccharidosis VI; OTIS,
Organization of Teratology Information Specialists; VAMPSS, Vaccines and Medications in Pregnancy Surveillance Study; VZV, varicella zoster virus.
Source: Internet searches and U.S. DHHS. Food and Drug Administration. Women’s Health Research. List of Pregnancy Exposure Registries.42