Distributed Systems

What Is A Distributed System?

• A collection of independent computers that
appears to its users as a single coherent system.
• Features:
– No shared memory – message-based communication
– Each runs its own local OS
– Heterogeneity
• Ideal: to present a single-system image:
– The distributed system “looks like” a single
computer rather than a collection of separate
computers.
 Distributed System
Characteristics
• To present a single-system image:
– Hide internal organization, communication details
– Provide uniform interface
• Easily expandable
– Adding new computers is hidden from users
• Continuous availability
– Failures in one component can be covered by other
components
• Supported by middleware
 Definition of a Distributed System

Figure 1-1. A distributed system organized as middleware. The

middleware layer runs on all machines, and offers a uniform
interface to the system
 Role of Middleware (MW)
• In some early research systems: MW tried
to provide the illusion that a collection of
separate machines was a single computer.
– E.g. NOW project: GLUNIX middleware
• Today:
– clustering software allows independent
computers to work together closely
– MW also supports seamless access to remote
services, doesn’t try to look like a general-
purpose OS
 Middleware Examples
• CORBA (Common Object Request Broker
Architecture)
• DCOM (Distributed Component Object
Management) – being replaced by .net
• Sun’s ONC RPC (Remote Procedure Call)
• RMI (Remote Method Invocation)
• SOAP (Simple Object Access Protocol)
 Middleware Examples
• All of the previous examples support
communication across a network:
• They provide protocols that allow a
program running on one kind of computer,
using one kind of operating system, to call a
program running on another computer with
a different operating system
– The communicating programs must be running
the same middleware.
 Distributed System Goals
• Resource Accessibility
• Distribution Transparency
• Openness
• Scalability
 Goal 1 – Resource Availability
• Support user access to remote resources (printers,
data files, web pages, CPU cycles) and the fair
sharing of the resources
• Economics of sharing expensive resources
• Performance enhancement – due to multiple
processors; also due to ease of collaboration and
info exchange – access to remote services
– Groupware: tools to support collaboration
• Resource sharing introduces security problems.
 Goal 2 – Distribution Transparency
• Software hides some of the details of the
distribution of system resources.
– Makes the system more user friendly.
• A distributed system that appears to its users &
applications to be a single computer system is said
to be transparent.
– Users & apps should be able to access remote
resources in the same way they access local
resources.
• Transparency has several dimensions.
 Types of Transparency
Transparency Description
Access Hide differences in data representation &
resource access (enables interoperability)
Location Hide location of resource (can use resource
without knowing its location)
Migration Hide possibility that a system may change
location of resource (no effect on access)
Replication Hide the possibility that multiple copies of the
resource exist (for reliability and/or
availability)
Concurrency Hide the possibility that the resource may be
shared concurrently
Failure Hide failure and recovery of the resource. How
does one differentiate betw. slow and failed?
Relocation Hide that resource may be moved during use
Goal 2: Degrees of Transparency
• Trade-off: transparency versus other factors
– Reduced performance: multiple attempts to
contact a remote server can slow down the
system – should you report failure and let user
cancel request?
– Convenience: direct the print request to my
local printer, not one on the next floor
• Too much emphasis on transparency may prevent
the user from understanding system behavior.
 Goal 3 - Openness
• An open distributed system “…offers services according to
standard rules that describe the syntax and semantics of those
services.” In other words, the interfaces to the system are
clearly specified and freely available.
– Compare to network protocols
– Not proprietary
• Interface Definition/Description Languages (IDL): used to
describe the interfaces between software components, usually
in a distributed system
– Definitions are language & machine independent
– Support communication between systems using different
OS/programming languages; e.g. a C++ program running on Windows
communicates with a Java program running on UNIX
– Communication is usually RPC-based.
 Examples of IDLs
Goal 3-Openness
• IDL: Interface Description Language
– The original
• WSDL: Web Services Description Language
– Provides machine-readable descriptions of the
services
• OMG IDL: used for RPC in CORBA
– OMG – Object Management Group
• …
 Open Systems Support …
• Interoperability: the ability of two different
systems or applications to work together
– A process that needs a service should be able to
talk to any process that provides the service.
– Multiple implementations of the same service
may be provided, as long as the interface is
maintained
• Portability: an application designed to run
on one distributed system can run on another
system which implements the same interface.
• Extensibility: Easy to add new components,
features
 Goal 4 - Scalability
• Dimensions that may scale:
– With respect to size
– With respect to geographical distribution
– With respect to the number of administrative
organizations spanned
• A scalable system still performs well as it
scales up along any of the three dimensions.
 Size Scalability

• Scalability is negatively affected when the system is

based on
– Centralized server: one for all users
– Centralized data: a single data base for all users
– Centralized algorithms: one site collects all information,
processes it, distributes the results to all sites.
• Complete knowledge: good
• Time and network traffic: bad
 Decentralized Algorithms

• No machine has complete information

about the system state
• Machines make decisions based only on
local information
• Failure of a single machine doesn’t ruin the
algorithm
• There is no assumption that a global clock
exists.
 Geographic Scalability
• Early distributed systems ran on LANs, relied on
synchronous communication.
– May be too slow for wide-area networks
– Wide-area communication is unreliable, point-to-point;
– Unpredictable time delays may even affect correctness
• LAN communication is based on broadcast.
– Consider how this affects an attempt to locate a
particular kind of service
• Centralized components + wide-area
communication: waste of network bandwidth
 Scalability - Administrative
• Different domains may have different
policies about resource usage, management,
security, etc.
• Trust often stops at administrative
boundaries
– Requires protection from malicious attacks
 Scaling Techniques
• Scalability affects performance more than
anything else.
• Three techniques to improve scalability:
– Hiding communication latencies
– Distribution
– Replication
 Hiding Communication Delays

• Structure applications to use asynchronous

communication (no blocking for replies)
– While waiting for one answer, do something else; e.g.,
create one thread to wait for the reply and let other
threads continue to process or schedule another task
• Download part of the computation to the
requesting platform to speed up processing
– Filling in forms to access a DB: send a separate
message for each field, or download form/code and
submit finished version.
– i.e., shorten the wait times
 Scaling Techniques

Figure 1-4. The difference between letting (a) a server

or (b) a client check forms as they are being filled.
 Distribution
• Instead of one centralized service, divide
into parts and distribute geographically
• Each part handles one aspect of the job
– Example: DNS namespace is organized as a
tree of domains; each domain is divided into
zones; names in each zone are handled by a
different name server
– WWW consists of many (millions?) of servers
 Scaling Techniques (2)

Figure 1-5. An example of dividing the DNS

name space into zones.
 Third Scaling Technique -
Replication
• Replication: multiple identical copies of
something
– Replicated objects may also be distributed, but
aren’t necessarily.
• Replication
– Increases availability
– Improves performance through load balancing
– May avoid latency by improving proximity of
resource
 Caching
• Caching is a form of replication
– Normally creates a (temporary) replica of
something closer to the user
• Replication is often more permanent
• User (client system) decides to cache,
server system decides to replicate
• Both lead to consistency problems
 Summary
Goals for Distribution
• Resource accessibility
– For sharing and enhanced performance
• Distribution transparency
– For easier use
• Openness
– To support interoperability, portability, extensibility
• Scalability
– With respect to size (number of users), geographic
distribution, administrative domains
 Issues/Pitfalls of Distribution
• Requirement for advanced software to realize the
potential benefits.
• Security and privacy concerns regarding network
communication
• Replication of data and services provides fault
tolerance and availability, but at a cost.
• Network reliability, security, heterogeneity,
topology
• Latency and bandwidth
• Administrative domains
 Distributed Systems
• Early distributed systems emphasized the
single system image – often tried to make a
networked set of computers look like an
ordinary general purpose computer
• Examples: Amoeba, Sprite, NOW, Condor
(distributed batch system), …
 Types of Distributed Systems
• Distributed Computing Systems
– Clusters
– Grids
– Clouds
• Distributed Information Systems
– Transaction Processing Systems
– Enterprise Application Integration
• Distributed Embedded Systems
– Home systems
– Health care systems
– Sensor networks
 Cluster Computing
• A collection of similar processors (PCs,
workstations) running the same operating
system, connected by a high-speed LAN.
• Parallel computing capabilities using
inexpensive PC hardware
• Replace big parallel computers (MPPs)
 Cluster Types & Uses
• High Performance Clusters (HPC)
– run large parallel programs
– Scientific, military, engineering apps; e.g., weather
modeling
• Load Balancing Clusters
– Front end processor distributes incoming requests
– server farms (e.g., at banks or popular web site)
• High Availability Clusters (HA)
– Provide redundancy – back up systems
– May be more fault tolerant than large mainframes
 Clusters – Beowulf model
• Linux-based
• Master-slave paradigm
– One processor is the master; allocates tasks to
other processors, maintains batch queue of
submitted jobs, handles interface to users
– Master has libraries to handle message-based
communication or other features (the
middleware).
 Cluster Computing Systems
• Figure 1-6. An example of a cluster
computing system.

Figure 1-6. An example of a (Beowolf) cluster

computing system
 Clusters – MOSIX model
• Provides a symmetric, rather than
hierarchical paradigm
– High degree of distribution transparency (single
system image)
– Processes can migrate between nodes
dynamically and preemptively (more about this
later.) Migration is automatic
• Used to manage Linux clusters
 More About MOSIX
“The MOSIX Management System for Linux Clusters, Multi-clusters,
GPU Clusters and Clouds”, A. Barak and A. Shiloh”

• “Operating-system-like”; looks & feels like

a single computer with multiple processors
• Supports interactive and batch processes
• Provides resource discovery and workload
distribution among clusters
• Clusters can be partitioned for use by an
individual or a group
• Best for compute-intensive jobs
 Grid Computing Systems
• Modeled loosely on the electrical grid.
• Highly heterogeneous with respect to
hardware, software, networks, security
policies, etc.
• Grids support virtual organizations: a
collaboration of users who pool resources
(servers, storage, databases) and share them
• Grid software is concerned with managing
sharing across administrative domains.
 Grids
• Similar to clusters but processors are more loosely
coupled, tend to be heterogeneous, and are not all
in a central location.
• Can handle workloads similar to those on
supercomputers, but grid computers connect over
a network (Internet?) and supercomputers’ CPUs
connect to a high-speed internal bus/network
• Problems are broken up into parts and distributed
across multiple computers in the grid – less
communication betw parts than in clusters.
 A Proposed Architecture for Grid Systems*
• Fabric layer: interfaces to local
resources at a specific site
• Connectivity layer: protocols to
support usage of multiple resources
for a single application; e.g., access
a remote resource or transfer data
between resources; and protocols to
provide security
• Resource layer manages a single
resource, using functions supplied
by the connectivity layer
• Collective layer: resource
discovery, allocation, scheduling,
etc.
• Applications: use the grid
resources
• The collective, connectivity and Figure 1-7. A layered architecture
resource layers together form the
middleware layer for a grid for grid computing systems
OGSA – Another Grid Architecture*

• Open Grid Services Architecture (OGSA) is

a service-oriented architecture
– Sites that offer resources to share do so by
offering specific Web services.
• The architecture of the OGSA model is
more complex than the previous layered
model.
 Globus Toolkit*
• An example of grid middleware
• Supports the combination of heterogeneous
platforms into virtual organizations.
• Implements the OSGA standards, among
others.
 Cloud Computing
• Provides scalable services as a utility over
the Internet.
• Often built on a computer grid
• Users buy services from the cloud
– Grid users may develop and run their own
software
• Cluster/grid/cloud distinctions blur at the
edges!
 Types of Distributed Systems

• Distributed Computing Systems

– Clusters
– Grids
– Clouds
• Distributed Information Systems
• Distributed Embedded Systems
Distributed Information Systems
• Business-oriented
• Systems to make a number of separate
network applications interoperable and
build “enterprise-wide information
systems”.
• Two types discussed here:
– Transaction processing systems
– Enterprise application integration (EAI)
 Transaction Processing Systems
• Provide a highly structured client-server
approach for database applications
• Transactions are the communication model
• Obey the ACID properties:
– Atomic: all or nothing
– Consistent: invariants are preserved
– Isolated (serializable)
– Durable: committed operations can’t be undone
 Transaction Processing Systems
• Figure 1-8. Example primitives for
transactions.

Figure 1-8. Example primitives for transactions

 Transactions
• Transaction processing may be centralized
(traditional client/server system) or
distributed.
• A distributed database is one in which the
data storage is distributed – connected to
separate processors.
 Nested Transactions
• A nested transaction is a transaction within
another transaction (a sub-transaction)
– Example: a transaction may ask for two things
(e.g., airline reservation info + hotel info)
which would spawn two nested transactions
• Primary transaction waits for the results.
– While children are active parent may only
abort, commit, or spawn other children
Transaction Processing Systems

Figure 1-9. A nested transaction.

 Implementing Transactions
• Conceptually, private copy of all data
• Actually, usually based on logs
• Multiple sub-transactions – commit, abort
– Durability is a characteristic of top-level
transactions only
• Nested transactions are suitable for
distributed systems
– Transaction processing monitor may interface
between client and multiple data bases.
 Enterprise Application Integration
• Less structured than transaction-based systems
• EA components communicate directly
– Enterprise applications are things like HR data,
inventory programs, …
– May use different OSs, different DBs but need to
interoperate sometimes.
• Communication mechanisms to support this
include CORBA, Remote Procedure Call (RPC)
and Remote Method Invocation (RMI)
 Enterprise Application
Integration

Figure 1-11. Middleware as a communication facilitator in enterprise

application integration.
 Distributed Pervasive Systems
• The first two types of systems are characterized by
their stability: nodes and network connections are
more or less fixed
• This type of system is likely to incorporate small,
battery-powered, mobile devices
– Home systems
– Electronic health care systems – patient monitoring
– Sensor networks – data collection, surveillance
 Home System
• Built around one or more PCs, but can also
include other electronic devices:
– Automatic control of lighting, sprinkler
systems, alarm systems, etc.
– Network enabled appliances
– PDAs and smart phones, etc.
 Electronic Health Care Systems

Figure 1-12. Monitoring a person in a pervasive electronic health care

system, using (a) a local hub or (b) a continuous wireless connection.
 Sensor Networks
• A collection of geographically distributed nodes
consisting of a comm. device, a power source,
some kind of sensor, a small processor…
• Purpose: to collectively monitor sensory data
(temperature, sound, moisture etc.,) and
transmit the data to a base station
• “smart environment” – the nodes may do some
rudimentary processing of the data in addition
to their communication responsibilities.
 Sensor Networks

Figure 1-13. Organizing a sensor network database, while storing and

processing data (a) only at the operator’s site or …
 Sensor Networks

Figure 1-13. Organizing a sensor network database, while storing and

processing data … or (b) only at the sensors.
 Summary – Types of Systems
• Distributed computing systems – our main
emphasis
• Distributed information systems – we will
talk about some aspects of them
• Distributed pervasive systems – not so
much
****
Questions?
 Additional Slides
• Middleware: CORBA, ONC RPC, SOAP
• Distributed Systems – Historical
Perspective
• Grid Computing Sites
 CORBA
• “CORBA is the acronym for Common Object
Request Broker Architecture, OMG's open,
vendor-independent architecture and infrastructure
that computer applications use to work together
over networks. Using the standard protocol IIOP,
a CORBA-based program from any vendor, on
almost any computer, operating system,
programming language, and network, can
interoperate with a CORBA-based program from
the same or another vendor, on almost any other
computer, operating system, programming
language, and network.”
http://www.omg.org/gettingstarted/corbafaq.htm
 ONC RPC
• “ONC RPC, short for Open Network
Computing Remote Procedure Call, is a
widely deployed remote procedure call
system. ONC was originally developed by
Sun Microsystems as part of their Network
File System project, and is sometimes
referred to as Sun ONC or Sun RPC.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Network_Computing_Remote_Procedure_Call
 Simple Object Access Protocol
• SOAP is a lightweight protocol for exchange of
information in a decentralized, distributed environment. It
is an XML based protocol that consists of three parts: an
envelope that defines a framework for describing what is
in a message and how to process it, a set of encoding rules
for expressing instances of application-defined datatypes,
and a convention for representing remote procedure calls
and responses. SOAP can potentially be used in
combination with a variety of other protocols; however,
the only bindings defined in this document describe how to
use SOAP in combination with HTTP and HTTP
Extension Framework.
• http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/NOTE-SOAP-20000508/
 Historical Perspective - MPPs
• Compare clusters to the Massively Parallel
Processors of the 1990’s
• Many separate nodes, each with its own
private memory –hundreds or thousands of
nodes (e.g., Cray T3E, nCube)
– Manufactured as a single computer with a
proprietary OS, very fast communication
network.
– Designed to run large, compute-intensive
parallel applications
– Expensive, long time-to-market cycle
 Historical Perspective - NOWs
• Networks of Workstations
• Designed to harvest idle workstation cycles
to support compute-intensive applications.
• Advocates contended that if done properly,
you could get the power of an MPP at
minimal additional cost.
• Supported general-purpose processing and
parallel applications
 Other Grid Resources
• The Globus Alliance: “a community of organizations
and individuals developing fundamental technologies
behind the "Grid," which lets people share computing
power, databases, instruments, and other on-line tools
securely across corporate, institutional, and geographic
boundaries without sacrificing local autonomy”
• Grid Computing Info Center: “aims to promote the
development and advancement of technologies that
provide seamless and scalable access to wide-area
distributed resources”